H
ow many women do you know who count their bless-
ings to have men who are willing to do any of these
tasks in even the smallest proportion? How do we as
a society judge women who give custody of the chil-
dren to the father? What do these attitudes and per-
ceptions mean? Have you ever wondered if this is okay for today?
Public policy dictates that a female should be given four months’
(unpaid) maternity leave. Public policy has to be adopted by the
private sector, and so it is that most companies give between four
and six months’ (paid) maternity leave. The corporates that give six
months want to be above average in their pull factors in order to
retain female employees – especially considering their weighting on
the Department of Trade and Industry (dti) scorecard. Doesn’t that
give you a warm, cosy feeling?
So, I’ll bet that you are thinking one of the following three things,
or some variation thereof:
1)	 Which companies are these, and where do I apply?
2)	 Why doesn’t my company give six months, and what will moti-
vate it to change this?
3)	 Why did this policy not apply when I had my children? The
younger generation is so lucky!
Now: Did you know that public policy does not allow any pa-
ternity leave? In fact, according to public policy, a man can take the
three days of family responsibility leave for paternity leave. Again,
public policy has to be adopted by the private sector, and so it is that
most companies give between two and five days’ paternity leave.
Doesn’t that give you a warm, cosy feeling?
How many times have you heard women say “I have such an amazing husband – he changes nappies!” or “He
wakes up for the baby too” or “He cooks!” or “Ag shame! He helps me clean the house”?
by Anisa Visser
and Sticky Floors
These are facts that we know – but what does the confluence
of public- and private-sector policy actually tell us? The question
is: What does that actually mean? To me, it means that, in South
Africa, we believe that raising children is a woman’s job.
I want you to take a minute and take a deep breath before you
continue. I want you to understand that I am about to say some-
thing that is going to move you! Whether positively or negatively – I
cannot tell you. What I can tell you are two things:
1)	 Once you have read it, you cannot unread it.
2)	 The concept will stay with you, and you will talk about it to at
least one other person.
So here it is: Until companies are saying, “When that baby
comes, he is so out of here”, nothing of major importance will shift
in the trajectory of a woman’s career. And until public and private
sector understand that gender is a business issue and not a female
issue, not much real progress will be made.
Research shows us that economically active men in general have
linear curves in their careers, while economically active women in
general have M-curves in their careers. What does this mean? This
means that men progress steadily (albeit sometimes slowly) through-
out their careers, while women’s careers start off as strongly as men’s,
dip when they have children, and start to rise again when the children
are grown up. I am not just talking about maternity leave here; I am
talking about who leaves early to take a child to the doctor, about who
stays at home with the sick children, about who gets home in time for
cooking and homework, and about who picks up and drops off the
children. All this impedes a woman’s ability to stay late, develop the
GlassCeilings
amount of parental leave for both parents on a child’s birth. This can
be taken in any combination. So, with six months’ leave, the parents
will decide how they split this up between the two of them. Four-
day work weeks are common in these countries for both parents.
And fathers play active roles in their children’s and wives’ lives.
Imagine how different our lives would be if we stopped talk-
ing about equality at work and started understanding that, when it
comes to children, we in South Africa have a long way to go before
having equality for both parents.
South Africa has one of the highest rates of children brought
up by single mothers. Most have battled our systems to get meagre
maintenance, and a great many more get nothing. The presence of
a father has been much talked about, and, yet, we as a society can-
not afford them the opportunity to be fathers. What is five days
when compared with four months? What if the woman’s career is
on an upward trajectory or she is the major earner? These months
have a compound effect on her career. What about how this sets the
role of the father as a disciplinarian – “I am going to tell Dad when
he gets home about your bad behaviour” – or as the holder of the
purse strings – “Ask your father for the money”? What messages do
we really want our children to grow up with?
I have a foundation to lay for the women who come after me.
My beautiful, 19-year-old daughter should have the opportunity to
have a father for her children, and also have a career. After all, I have
invested as much in her education as in her brother’s. I want my son
to be able to have three months’ parental leave to bond with his
children, to know what their different cries mean, to be present in
their lives, to leave work to get them to the orthodontist, to ask for a
half day off to buy a matric-dance dress. I want him to have the right
to be a parent as a matter of policy.
I strongly believe that we cannot advance female careers and
quality of life in South Africa if public and private sector do not
jointly come up with policy that advances parental rights. We need
to rethink paternal leave, we need to rethink working hours for both
parents, we need to get our schools’ hours to change and to include
extracurricular activities and sports that do not cost an arm and a
leg. Government will then not need to look anxiously for the solu-
tions to why women’s skills
are being undervalued. We
would not have to see head-
lines saying: ‘50% of Top Jobs
to Women’. After all, which
woman can get there when
the hours are relentless, the
pace exhausting, and there is
no support in policy. It used
to be said: “Behind every
great man is a great woman”.
Now it also applies that, “Be-
hind every great woman is a
great man.” We just need to
give them the chance.
Anisa Visser is Managing Director of Living your Dream, a 100%
black-owned transformation and leadership consultancy. Anisa can
be contacted on 082-788-0857.
informal networks, go out for a drink, interact during the friendly, in-
terdepartmental action cricket events, and, most importantly, be con-
nected to the undertones, the movers, the shakers, the new projects,
the expansions, the mergers and the acquisitions.
In countries like Germany, where government is desperate
to raise the birth rate, and with current fertility rates of 1:3 being
nowhere near the required rate of 2:1, the government has im-
plemented many initiatives to encourage women to stay at home.
These include child benefit allowances and parent’s salary called El-
terngeld, which pays between €300 and €1 800 a month to stay at
home (father’s can have some of this leave – a small portion). This
has surprisingly not pushed up the birth rate, because, for women,
the choice is between career and family, and many choose career.
Infrastructure like daycare is completely lacking, societal pressure
pushes women to stay at home after they have had children, and
school hours are complicated, varied and short.
In contrast, in France, half of the graduates of business schools
are women, who actually have more than the national average 2.2
children, and where 80% of them work full-time throughout their
career because of the French government’s proactive policies on
gender balance. Public-sector policy allows a 35-hour work week
and equal parental rights for both parents. In France, societal pres-
sure is for women to work. France’s school systems keep children
in schools (which are state-funded) till 18:00, with state-subsidised,
extracurricular activities from the age of three, and subsidised train-
ing for baby-sitters. Not surprising, then, that France leads Europe
with powerful women and has a robust pipeline of women ready to
take over the reins.
In the United States of America, most of the strides made by
women have come about as a result of private-sector policy. Pub-
lic policy is woefully lacking. The Nordic countries allow a certain
Anisa Visser

Glass ceilings and sticky floors

  • 1.
    H ow many womendo you know who count their bless- ings to have men who are willing to do any of these tasks in even the smallest proportion? How do we as a society judge women who give custody of the chil- dren to the father? What do these attitudes and per- ceptions mean? Have you ever wondered if this is okay for today? Public policy dictates that a female should be given four months’ (unpaid) maternity leave. Public policy has to be adopted by the private sector, and so it is that most companies give between four and six months’ (paid) maternity leave. The corporates that give six months want to be above average in their pull factors in order to retain female employees – especially considering their weighting on the Department of Trade and Industry (dti) scorecard. Doesn’t that give you a warm, cosy feeling? So, I’ll bet that you are thinking one of the following three things, or some variation thereof: 1) Which companies are these, and where do I apply? 2) Why doesn’t my company give six months, and what will moti- vate it to change this? 3) Why did this policy not apply when I had my children? The younger generation is so lucky! Now: Did you know that public policy does not allow any pa- ternity leave? In fact, according to public policy, a man can take the three days of family responsibility leave for paternity leave. Again, public policy has to be adopted by the private sector, and so it is that most companies give between two and five days’ paternity leave. Doesn’t that give you a warm, cosy feeling? How many times have you heard women say “I have such an amazing husband – he changes nappies!” or “He wakes up for the baby too” or “He cooks!” or “Ag shame! He helps me clean the house”? by Anisa Visser and Sticky Floors These are facts that we know – but what does the confluence of public- and private-sector policy actually tell us? The question is: What does that actually mean? To me, it means that, in South Africa, we believe that raising children is a woman’s job. I want you to take a minute and take a deep breath before you continue. I want you to understand that I am about to say some- thing that is going to move you! Whether positively or negatively – I cannot tell you. What I can tell you are two things: 1) Once you have read it, you cannot unread it. 2) The concept will stay with you, and you will talk about it to at least one other person. So here it is: Until companies are saying, “When that baby comes, he is so out of here”, nothing of major importance will shift in the trajectory of a woman’s career. And until public and private sector understand that gender is a business issue and not a female issue, not much real progress will be made. Research shows us that economically active men in general have linear curves in their careers, while economically active women in general have M-curves in their careers. What does this mean? This means that men progress steadily (albeit sometimes slowly) through- out their careers, while women’s careers start off as strongly as men’s, dip when they have children, and start to rise again when the children are grown up. I am not just talking about maternity leave here; I am talking about who leaves early to take a child to the doctor, about who stays at home with the sick children, about who gets home in time for cooking and homework, and about who picks up and drops off the children. All this impedes a woman’s ability to stay late, develop the GlassCeilings
  • 2.
    amount of parentalleave for both parents on a child’s birth. This can be taken in any combination. So, with six months’ leave, the parents will decide how they split this up between the two of them. Four- day work weeks are common in these countries for both parents. And fathers play active roles in their children’s and wives’ lives. Imagine how different our lives would be if we stopped talk- ing about equality at work and started understanding that, when it comes to children, we in South Africa have a long way to go before having equality for both parents. South Africa has one of the highest rates of children brought up by single mothers. Most have battled our systems to get meagre maintenance, and a great many more get nothing. The presence of a father has been much talked about, and, yet, we as a society can- not afford them the opportunity to be fathers. What is five days when compared with four months? What if the woman’s career is on an upward trajectory or she is the major earner? These months have a compound effect on her career. What about how this sets the role of the father as a disciplinarian – “I am going to tell Dad when he gets home about your bad behaviour” – or as the holder of the purse strings – “Ask your father for the money”? What messages do we really want our children to grow up with? I have a foundation to lay for the women who come after me. My beautiful, 19-year-old daughter should have the opportunity to have a father for her children, and also have a career. After all, I have invested as much in her education as in her brother’s. I want my son to be able to have three months’ parental leave to bond with his children, to know what their different cries mean, to be present in their lives, to leave work to get them to the orthodontist, to ask for a half day off to buy a matric-dance dress. I want him to have the right to be a parent as a matter of policy. I strongly believe that we cannot advance female careers and quality of life in South Africa if public and private sector do not jointly come up with policy that advances parental rights. We need to rethink paternal leave, we need to rethink working hours for both parents, we need to get our schools’ hours to change and to include extracurricular activities and sports that do not cost an arm and a leg. Government will then not need to look anxiously for the solu- tions to why women’s skills are being undervalued. We would not have to see head- lines saying: ‘50% of Top Jobs to Women’. After all, which woman can get there when the hours are relentless, the pace exhausting, and there is no support in policy. It used to be said: “Behind every great man is a great woman”. Now it also applies that, “Be- hind every great woman is a great man.” We just need to give them the chance. Anisa Visser is Managing Director of Living your Dream, a 100% black-owned transformation and leadership consultancy. Anisa can be contacted on 082-788-0857. informal networks, go out for a drink, interact during the friendly, in- terdepartmental action cricket events, and, most importantly, be con- nected to the undertones, the movers, the shakers, the new projects, the expansions, the mergers and the acquisitions. In countries like Germany, where government is desperate to raise the birth rate, and with current fertility rates of 1:3 being nowhere near the required rate of 2:1, the government has im- plemented many initiatives to encourage women to stay at home. These include child benefit allowances and parent’s salary called El- terngeld, which pays between €300 and €1 800 a month to stay at home (father’s can have some of this leave – a small portion). This has surprisingly not pushed up the birth rate, because, for women, the choice is between career and family, and many choose career. Infrastructure like daycare is completely lacking, societal pressure pushes women to stay at home after they have had children, and school hours are complicated, varied and short. In contrast, in France, half of the graduates of business schools are women, who actually have more than the national average 2.2 children, and where 80% of them work full-time throughout their career because of the French government’s proactive policies on gender balance. Public-sector policy allows a 35-hour work week and equal parental rights for both parents. In France, societal pres- sure is for women to work. France’s school systems keep children in schools (which are state-funded) till 18:00, with state-subsidised, extracurricular activities from the age of three, and subsidised train- ing for baby-sitters. Not surprising, then, that France leads Europe with powerful women and has a robust pipeline of women ready to take over the reins. In the United States of America, most of the strides made by women have come about as a result of private-sector policy. Pub- lic policy is woefully lacking. The Nordic countries allow a certain Anisa Visser