GO in Heterogeneous Language Environments
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes248 views
The document discusses different communication channels for heterogeneous environments including databases, webhooks, publish/subscribe, and RPC. It then evaluates several queue systems like ActiveMQ, RabbitMQ, and Faktory. Faktory is recommended for simple interconnections due to its easy setup costs, support for most languages, and ability to handle around 1,000 requests per second. For more requests, considerations include required speed, available resources, whether an MQ server is acceptable, and language support requirements.
GO in Heterogeneous Language Environments
- 2. ABOUT ME 17 years in IT Addict of Programming Languages Polyglot OpenSource contributor
- 4. USING HARDWARE AND SYSTEM SOFTWARE FROM DIFFERENT VENDORS
- 9. COMMUNICATION CHANNELS • Database • WebHook • Pub/Sub • RPC
- 11. DATABASE • Easy to use • Transactions • Slow • Hard to maintain
- 13. WEBHOOK • Fast • Flexible • Secure • Hard fallback logic • Connection issues • No retries
- 15. PUB/SUB • Message Oriented • Channel based • No persistance • Oriented on real-time messages
- 17. RPC • Many Implementations • Binary protocols • Secure • Need to wait on response • No persistance
- 21. QUEUES SYSTEMS • ActiveMQ • RabbitMQ • Faktory • NSQ
- 23. HOW TO CHOOSE? • Setup costs • Support costs • Implementation costs • Hardware costs • Benchmark
- 24. SETUP COSTS • How much time required to run it locally? • How must time to run in production? • Multi-Nodes support?
- 25. SUPPORT COSTS • How stable is it? • How to catch errors? • Fault-Tolerance?
- 26. IMPLEMENTATION COSTS • Does API is easy to use? • How clients documented? • Supported platforms and languages?
- 27. HARDWARE COSTS • Does it required a lot of resources? • How it deal with big amount of requests? • Data recovery? Backups?
- 28. BENCHMARK • Run a stress testing with limited resources • Run a stress testing with ultra power resources • 99% percentile of overload test
- 29. FAKTORY • Sidekiq like behavior • Easy to start • Best option for simple interconnection • Clients for most usable languages
- 30. FAKTORY • Used in 3 projects which related to marketing/advertising automation • We have connected Ruby, Go, PHP in one ecosystem • Nice UI to check what is going • ~1000 req/second
- 31. HAVE MORE REQUESTS? • How fast you need to proceed them? • How much resources you will have for them? • MQ Server is ok for you? • Can you say bye for other languages?
- 32. QUESTIONS?