Becoming Leeds Beckett
University: Fostering a
community of change
Victoria Sanderson, Head of the Strategic
Planning Support Service &
Clare Jackson, Planning & Projects Manager
Strategic Planning Support Service
Name change quiz
Test your brand knowledge - Can
you fill in the blanks in our name
change and brand quiz?
Name change & brand quiz answers
1. Lloyds pharmacy
2. John Lewis
Name change & brand quiz answers
3. Snickers
4. Starburst
5. Pepsi
6. Google
Name change & brand quiz answers
Other institutions have braved this before us…
7a. University of Central England (changed to
Birmingham City University in 2007)
7b. Thames Valley University (changed to University of
West London in 2010)
Name change & brand quiz answers
Brand confusion…
8. Ferrari
9. Costa Coffee
10. Lego
PART B: Discussion point
(5mins)
How do brand changes make us feel?
What behaviour or concerns might
this spark in customers/stakeholders?
Community
Who are we to our
stakeholders?
Business
Social commentators
Charity
Enterprise hub
Knowledge
generator
Voluntary support
Personal support
Advisor
Service
user
Publisher
Creator/producer
HomePeer
Sponsor
Professional
practitioners Experts
Service provider
Research
institute
Competitor
Customer
Employer
Trainer
Partner
Sports
Centre
Economic contributor
Support
network
Experience provider
Social enterprise
Dependent
Funder
Proprietor
Tennant Consumer
Friend
Client
Neighbour
Educator
Social hub
What concerns may our stakeholders
have?
Will employers
recognise our
awards?
Will our business
processes remain the
same?
Will quality change?
Will we still be the
same organisation?
Will they have a say in
the choice of name?
Will contractual
arrangements remain
the same?
Becoming Leeds Beckett
University: Fostering a
community of change
How we engaged all of our
stakeholders in our name change
journey…
Becoming Leeds Beckett
University: Fostering a
community of change
• Why change our name?
• Stakeholder consultation
• Taking our stakeholders with us
• What difference has it made?
• What next?
Why now?
Institutional reasons
 Strong progress against our Strategic
Plan and KPIs
 Out grown our current name
 Completed curriculum reviews and
rationalised our portfolio
 Embedded graduate attributes
 Increased international applicants
 Increased our tariff
 One of three Leeds Universities
 Seeking Customer Service
Excellence & Investors in People
Gold accreditations
Why now?
External environment
 New fee regime
 ‘Market competition’ and need for
distinction
 Distinctive names have been used by
other post-92 Universities e.g. Sheffield
Hallam, Nottingham Trent and Oxford
Brookes amongst others
Why?
The rationale for the name change
The message we shared with our stakeholders
during and after our the name transition:
We are one of the most popular universities in the
UK and we would like a name which is distinctive
(i.e. there are four other metropolitans) and reflects
our ambition in a competitive global market.
Stakeholder consultation
Why did we engage stakeholders in the
choice of name?
 To develop our relationships with them
 To support our application
 To capture & listen to both positive
and negative feedback
 Answer questions & minimise
confusion
 To start a significant
journey of change
– & bring everyone
with us!
Stakeholder consultation
Name suggestions from our stakeholders
100Potential names
Geographic Northern People
Shortlist
Leeds Headingley University
Leeds Beckett University
Leeds Ridings University
Lowest risk and highest
opportunity combinations.
Title Risk Opportunity level
Aire High Very low
Beckett Mid High
Headingley Low High
Ridings Mid High
Rose Very High High
Students
Staff
Applicants
Alumni
Honorary Graduates
Funding Bodies
Charities Commission
HE & FE Institutions
Partners, schools, colleges & organisations
Professional, statutory & regulatory bodies
Local MPs
Leeds City Council
Other affected by name change
Stakeholder consultation
Reviewing our shortlist
3.2%
Response
rate
Formal consultation
28 May – 28 June 201345450 Stakeholders
contacted
Stakeholder consultation
The favoured choice
Board approval
19 July 2013
Mostpositive & leastnegative
comments
Stakeholder consultation
Getting the green light!
Privy Council approval granted November 2013
Leeds Metropolitan University
to become
Leeds Beckett University
on 22 September 2014
Key successes in our
consultation process
 Visible leadership from our Vice Chancellor
and senior management;
 staff & student focus groups;
 fluent staff and student communications on
progress;
 a long lead time helped to decrease costs;
 logging stakeholder concerns to address in
name migration project;
 gaining Privy council approval to provide
awards that reference both names during the
transition phase – in response to student
feedback!
Taking our stakeholders
with us:
Our Name Migration
project
Project aims:
 To ensure a seamless transition to the new
University name;
 to minimise disruption to our business
processes and interactions;
 to ensure all of our stakeholders are
appropriately informed and engaged.
Taking our stakeholders with us:
Name Migration timelineproject
Nov
2013
Dec
2013
Jan
2014
Feb
2014
Mar
2014
Apr
2014
May
2014
Jun
2014
Jul
2014
Aug
2014
Sep
2014
Oct
2014
20 November 2013 - 29 October 2014
Taking our stakeholders with us
Project Governance
 Group established ahead of formal
approval to undertake scoping.
 Vice Chancellor’s Group
representation and Project Sponsor.
 Representation from Corporate
Management Team, departmental
heads and middle management.
 Monthly meetings – swift decision
making, horizon scanning & close
scrutiny of risks and issues.
 Standing item on Corporate
Management Team meeting
agenda.
Highly visible leadership
Swift decision making
Immediate staff updates
Strong customer focus
Foresight
Taking our stakeholders with us
Project focus
To do
To
inform
Current students
Alumni
Applicants
Prospects
Contractual partn
Customers
Suppliers
Media
Other
stakeholders
Educational
partners
International recruiters
External
systems &
websites
External
dependents
Staff & student cards
Trademarks/Ltd
companies
Regulatory
framework
Awards
Branded goods
Disposal
Signage
Financial arrangements
Systems
Legal
Hoodies
Staff & prospective
staff
What wasn’t included
 Name change consultation
 Brand distinctiveness
 Evaluation of the impact of
the name change
Decision
20 Nov
Staff
20 Nov
Students
21 Nov
Media
21 Nov
Student
FAQs
22 Nov
Staff
bulletin
25 Nov
Alumni
Mag
29 Nov
VC Staff
email
9 Dec
Initial comms timeline:
Taking our stakeholders with us
Current students
Name change post
exam boards and at
start of new
academic year
Consultation
with SU on
certificate
wording
Awards to
reference both
names during
transition period
New student cards
for all with SU logo
Financial support
for SU and
Athletic Union
re-branding
Signage
updated after
Graduation
Student facing
systems prioritised
for updating
Free Leeds Beckett
hoodie for all campus
students
Taking our stakeholders with us
Current students
Open forum with
VC and Secretary
& Registrar
www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk
Regular
communications via
multiple channels
Postcard provided
for students studying
with an educational
partner
Bespoke
communications for
placement, Erasmus
and study abroad
students.
Website pop-up
including name
change rationale
Student FAQs
Taking our stakeholders with us
Applicants & prospects
Applicant letter
to explain the
rationale
73%
read rate
On email to home
and EU students &
all comms over 50%
Stand to reference both
names and system to
acknowledge planned
change
Leeds Beckett
prospectus launched
March 2014
Bespoke comms to
international
students
New Be Beckett
TV ad launched
Agents conference
briefing April 2014
Taking our stakeholders with us
Staff
Corporate
Leadership team
review of project
highlight report
All staff to get a
new campus
card and hoodie
Practical guidelines
supplied on a
designated staff
intranet pageRegular staff
communications
IT services led audit
of systems requiring
updates
Mail out to 9,000
stakeholders
Mail out to:
3208+ suppliers
3416+ customers
2500+ other contacts
407 schools
Taking our stakeholders with us
Other stakeholders
Externally facing
systems
prioritised
Legal
consultation
Name change
email contact
point
External
signage
Press
interviews
Opportunistic
promotions
29 pieces of
coverage on
launch day
What difference has it
made?
Some intended outcomes:
 A sea of Leeds Beckett hoodies;
 A continued sense of community;
 Coordination with our brand identity;
 Improved aesthetic of our estate and signage;
 Positive feedback from international students
What difference has it
made
Some unintended outcomes:
 Increased confidence in our management
structures to deliver significant change;
 Engagement in our Project Management
Framework;
 Better engagement in staff communications;
 Greater understanding of our IT infrastructure;
 Sense of spring cleaning.
What next?
Starting position
 New name
 Successful QAA review
 Relatively stable financial position
 Increased REF profile
 Only University to hold Customer Service Excellence and
Investors in People Gold accreditations
 New DVC Academic & 2 new Deans
 New Chair of our Board of Governors
 Strong brand identity
What next?
On the horizon…
 New VC starting September 2015
 New Strategic Plan
 Really owning our name
 Building upon our distinctiveness
and reputation
 Maintaining our strong ‘people-
focussed’ workforce and
customer ethos

Becoming Leeds Beckett University - Victoria Sanderson * Clare Jackson

  • 1.
    Becoming Leeds Beckett University:Fostering a community of change Victoria Sanderson, Head of the Strategic Planning Support Service & Clare Jackson, Planning & Projects Manager Strategic Planning Support Service
  • 2.
    Name change quiz Testyour brand knowledge - Can you fill in the blanks in our name change and brand quiz?
  • 3.
    Name change &brand quiz answers 1. Lloyds pharmacy 2. John Lewis
  • 4.
    Name change &brand quiz answers 3. Snickers 4. Starburst 5. Pepsi 6. Google
  • 5.
    Name change &brand quiz answers Other institutions have braved this before us… 7a. University of Central England (changed to Birmingham City University in 2007) 7b. Thames Valley University (changed to University of West London in 2010)
  • 6.
    Name change &brand quiz answers Brand confusion… 8. Ferrari 9. Costa Coffee 10. Lego
  • 7.
    PART B: Discussionpoint (5mins) How do brand changes make us feel? What behaviour or concerns might this spark in customers/stakeholders?
  • 8.
    Community Who are weto our stakeholders? Business Social commentators Charity Enterprise hub Knowledge generator Voluntary support Personal support Advisor Service user Publisher Creator/producer HomePeer Sponsor Professional practitioners Experts Service provider Research institute Competitor Customer Employer Trainer Partner Sports Centre Economic contributor Support network Experience provider Social enterprise Dependent Funder Proprietor Tennant Consumer Friend Client Neighbour Educator Social hub
  • 9.
    What concerns mayour stakeholders have? Will employers recognise our awards? Will our business processes remain the same? Will quality change? Will we still be the same organisation? Will they have a say in the choice of name? Will contractual arrangements remain the same?
  • 10.
    Becoming Leeds Beckett University:Fostering a community of change How we engaged all of our stakeholders in our name change journey…
  • 11.
    Becoming Leeds Beckett University:Fostering a community of change • Why change our name? • Stakeholder consultation • Taking our stakeholders with us • What difference has it made? • What next?
  • 12.
    Why now? Institutional reasons Strong progress against our Strategic Plan and KPIs  Out grown our current name  Completed curriculum reviews and rationalised our portfolio  Embedded graduate attributes  Increased international applicants  Increased our tariff  One of three Leeds Universities  Seeking Customer Service Excellence & Investors in People Gold accreditations
  • 13.
    Why now? External environment New fee regime  ‘Market competition’ and need for distinction  Distinctive names have been used by other post-92 Universities e.g. Sheffield Hallam, Nottingham Trent and Oxford Brookes amongst others
  • 14.
    Why? The rationale forthe name change The message we shared with our stakeholders during and after our the name transition: We are one of the most popular universities in the UK and we would like a name which is distinctive (i.e. there are four other metropolitans) and reflects our ambition in a competitive global market.
  • 15.
    Stakeholder consultation Why didwe engage stakeholders in the choice of name?  To develop our relationships with them  To support our application  To capture & listen to both positive and negative feedback  Answer questions & minimise confusion  To start a significant journey of change – & bring everyone with us!
  • 16.
    Stakeholder consultation Name suggestionsfrom our stakeholders 100Potential names Geographic Northern People Shortlist Leeds Headingley University Leeds Beckett University Leeds Ridings University Lowest risk and highest opportunity combinations. Title Risk Opportunity level Aire High Very low Beckett Mid High Headingley Low High Ridings Mid High Rose Very High High
  • 17.
    Students Staff Applicants Alumni Honorary Graduates Funding Bodies CharitiesCommission HE & FE Institutions Partners, schools, colleges & organisations Professional, statutory & regulatory bodies Local MPs Leeds City Council Other affected by name change Stakeholder consultation Reviewing our shortlist 3.2% Response rate Formal consultation 28 May – 28 June 201345450 Stakeholders contacted
  • 18.
    Stakeholder consultation The favouredchoice Board approval 19 July 2013 Mostpositive & leastnegative comments
  • 19.
    Stakeholder consultation Getting thegreen light! Privy Council approval granted November 2013 Leeds Metropolitan University to become Leeds Beckett University on 22 September 2014
  • 20.
    Key successes inour consultation process  Visible leadership from our Vice Chancellor and senior management;  staff & student focus groups;  fluent staff and student communications on progress;  a long lead time helped to decrease costs;  logging stakeholder concerns to address in name migration project;  gaining Privy council approval to provide awards that reference both names during the transition phase – in response to student feedback!
  • 21.
    Taking our stakeholders withus: Our Name Migration project Project aims:  To ensure a seamless transition to the new University name;  to minimise disruption to our business processes and interactions;  to ensure all of our stakeholders are appropriately informed and engaged.
  • 22.
    Taking our stakeholderswith us: Name Migration timelineproject Nov 2013 Dec 2013 Jan 2014 Feb 2014 Mar 2014 Apr 2014 May 2014 Jun 2014 Jul 2014 Aug 2014 Sep 2014 Oct 2014 20 November 2013 - 29 October 2014
  • 23.
    Taking our stakeholderswith us Project Governance  Group established ahead of formal approval to undertake scoping.  Vice Chancellor’s Group representation and Project Sponsor.  Representation from Corporate Management Team, departmental heads and middle management.  Monthly meetings – swift decision making, horizon scanning & close scrutiny of risks and issues.  Standing item on Corporate Management Team meeting agenda. Highly visible leadership Swift decision making Immediate staff updates Strong customer focus Foresight
  • 24.
    Taking our stakeholderswith us Project focus To do To inform Current students Alumni Applicants Prospects Contractual partn Customers Suppliers Media Other stakeholders Educational partners International recruiters External systems & websites External dependents Staff & student cards Trademarks/Ltd companies Regulatory framework Awards Branded goods Disposal Signage Financial arrangements Systems Legal Hoodies Staff & prospective staff
  • 25.
    What wasn’t included Name change consultation  Brand distinctiveness  Evaluation of the impact of the name change Decision 20 Nov Staff 20 Nov Students 21 Nov Media 21 Nov Student FAQs 22 Nov Staff bulletin 25 Nov Alumni Mag 29 Nov VC Staff email 9 Dec Initial comms timeline:
  • 26.
    Taking our stakeholderswith us Current students Name change post exam boards and at start of new academic year Consultation with SU on certificate wording Awards to reference both names during transition period New student cards for all with SU logo Financial support for SU and Athletic Union re-branding Signage updated after Graduation Student facing systems prioritised for updating Free Leeds Beckett hoodie for all campus students
  • 27.
    Taking our stakeholderswith us Current students Open forum with VC and Secretary & Registrar www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk Regular communications via multiple channels Postcard provided for students studying with an educational partner Bespoke communications for placement, Erasmus and study abroad students. Website pop-up including name change rationale Student FAQs
  • 28.
    Taking our stakeholderswith us Applicants & prospects Applicant letter to explain the rationale 73% read rate On email to home and EU students & all comms over 50% Stand to reference both names and system to acknowledge planned change Leeds Beckett prospectus launched March 2014 Bespoke comms to international students New Be Beckett TV ad launched Agents conference briefing April 2014
  • 29.
    Taking our stakeholderswith us Staff Corporate Leadership team review of project highlight report All staff to get a new campus card and hoodie Practical guidelines supplied on a designated staff intranet pageRegular staff communications IT services led audit of systems requiring updates Mail out to 9,000 stakeholders
  • 30.
    Mail out to: 3208+suppliers 3416+ customers 2500+ other contacts 407 schools Taking our stakeholders with us Other stakeholders Externally facing systems prioritised Legal consultation Name change email contact point External signage Press interviews Opportunistic promotions 29 pieces of coverage on launch day
  • 31.
    What difference hasit made? Some intended outcomes:  A sea of Leeds Beckett hoodies;  A continued sense of community;  Coordination with our brand identity;  Improved aesthetic of our estate and signage;  Positive feedback from international students
  • 32.
    What difference hasit made Some unintended outcomes:  Increased confidence in our management structures to deliver significant change;  Engagement in our Project Management Framework;  Better engagement in staff communications;  Greater understanding of our IT infrastructure;  Sense of spring cleaning.
  • 33.
    What next? Starting position New name  Successful QAA review  Relatively stable financial position  Increased REF profile  Only University to hold Customer Service Excellence and Investors in People Gold accreditations  New DVC Academic & 2 new Deans  New Chair of our Board of Governors  Strong brand identity
  • 34.
    What next? On thehorizon…  New VC starting September 2015  New Strategic Plan  Really owning our name  Building upon our distinctiveness and reputation  Maintaining our strong ‘people- focussed’ workforce and customer ethos