Grant management  sample of a grant management flow chart  used by charity organisations Archiving registration Online data import appraisal advising decision making rejection payment progress monitoring measuring & evaluation Document mgt.; communication mgt. Progress report/ Financial report Narrative report co-financing/ fundraising Publicity, PR Authorisation registration appraisal advising decision making rejection payment Progress monitoring measuring & evaluation Archiving Process monitoring and workload management
Requirements that grant management software should meet Transparant, easy to use (self-explanatory) ‘ Safe’, should protect users from making administrative mistakes Flexible: license holders draw their own lines and safeguards Compatible: easy integration with other  software applications (financial administration / document management / fundraising, etc.)
Problem areas in current grant management software Accessibility, procedures are not self-explanatory; Protection against administrative errors; Document management; Measuring results and evaluation; Description of the connection to financial administration.
consider this… Did you visit license holders of both providers? Did you ask about the service level agreements (break downs, response time, hospitality, etc)? How much (time, money, HR) did license holders spend on introduction of the new software application?
Disclaimer (Please inform me if you share this slide show with anyone!) Slide show by Jan Riemersma, Consultancy for Civil Society [email_address] Neuweg 173 1214GP Hilversum +31 622 196 180 http://www.linkedin.com/in/janriemersma   Netherlands Chamber of Commerce reg. no. 32140439

Grant Application Management For Charities Flow Chart En

  • 1.
    Grant management sample of a grant management flow chart used by charity organisations Archiving registration Online data import appraisal advising decision making rejection payment progress monitoring measuring & evaluation Document mgt.; communication mgt. Progress report/ Financial report Narrative report co-financing/ fundraising Publicity, PR Authorisation registration appraisal advising decision making rejection payment Progress monitoring measuring & evaluation Archiving Process monitoring and workload management
  • 2.
    Requirements that grantmanagement software should meet Transparant, easy to use (self-explanatory) ‘ Safe’, should protect users from making administrative mistakes Flexible: license holders draw their own lines and safeguards Compatible: easy integration with other software applications (financial administration / document management / fundraising, etc.)
  • 3.
    Problem areas incurrent grant management software Accessibility, procedures are not self-explanatory; Protection against administrative errors; Document management; Measuring results and evaluation; Description of the connection to financial administration.
  • 4.
    consider this… Didyou visit license holders of both providers? Did you ask about the service level agreements (break downs, response time, hospitality, etc)? How much (time, money, HR) did license holders spend on introduction of the new software application?
  • 5.
    Disclaimer (Please informme if you share this slide show with anyone!) Slide show by Jan Riemersma, Consultancy for Civil Society [email_address] Neuweg 173 1214GP Hilversum +31 622 196 180 http://www.linkedin.com/in/janriemersma   Netherlands Chamber of Commerce reg. no. 32140439