Hcr Ffg Presentation
- 1. Presented by: 1
- 2. The following describes key elements of the health care reform legislation that affect employers The legislation includes the following bills: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA, HR 3590), passed March 21 by Congress (and signed into law by President Obama March 23; and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (HR 4872), passed by the House on March 21 and sent to the Senate. As noted above, PPACA became law on March 23 but only when HR 4872 was enacted. 2
- 3. Group Market Reforms Preserving and Expanding Coverage Health Insurance Market Reforms Grandfathered Plan Rules Collectively Bargained Plans Employer Mandates Other Provisions 3
- 4. The following provisions are effective for plan years beginning on or after September 23, 2010, unless otherwise indicated. No Lifetime Limits A plan may not apply lifetime dollar limits on what are known as “essential health benefits.” Essential health benefits are the types of benefits that must be included in health plans offered under the state insurance clearinghouses referred to in the new law as “exchanges. Health and Human Services (“HHS”) will define what constitutes an essential health benefit. 4
- 5. No Annual Limits A plan may not apply any annual dollar limits on essential health benefits for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2014. For plan years beginning prior to January 2014, some restricted annual limits may apply to essential health benefits, if those limits would not violate other federal or state laws. 5
- 6. Prohibition on Rescissions of Coverage A plan must not rescind coverage once a participant has become covered, unless the individual has performed an act or practice that constitutes fraud, or has made an intentional misrepresentation of material fact, “as prohibited by the terms of the plan.” In addition, it appears that a plan, or a participant’s coverage under a plan may not be cancelled except with prior notice to the participant. Even where a participant has engaged in fraud – such as by lying about a claim, or trying to gain coverage for an individual by wrongly asserting that she or he is the employee’s spouse or dependent – the participant may be retroactively removed as a participant only if the plan language so provides. 6
- 7. Preventive Services A plan must provide coverage for, and may not impose any cost-sharing requirements with respect to, certain preventative care, including recommended immunizations. The statute refers to particular lists of recommendations and guidelines for determining which preventative services are subject to this prohibition on cost-sharing. 7
- 8. Dependent Coverage for Older Children A plan that provides dependent coverage of children must continue to make that coverage available for an adult child until the child turns 26 years of age. This requirement applies even to married children. Plans are not required to make coverage available for a child of a child receiving dependent coverage (that is, for example, for a grandchild of a participant). 8
- 9. Uniform Explanation of Coverage HHS is required to develop standards for plans to use in summarizing plan benefits and coverage for participants. These standards are supposed to be developed by March 23, 2011. The required summaries will be a short “highlights” description of the plan. It must not exceed 4 pages in length and must not include print smaller than 12-point font. The statute describes the information that must be covered by the summary. Plans will have until March 23, 2012, to begin using these new summaries. 9
- 10. Deadline for Summaries of Material Modification A notice of any material modification be given to participants at least 60 days prior to the date the plan modification is to become effective. This provision is generally effective for plan years beginning on or after September 23, 2010. 10
- 11. Penalty for Failure to Provide New Summary or SMM A penalty of not more than $1,000 may apply for each willful failure to provide the required plan summary or advance summary of a material modification. Each participant who fails to receive a required summary (or summary of material modification) is counted separately in determining the amount of the penalty, so it appears that a willful failure to timely provide 5 participants with a summary could result in a fine of up to $5,000. 11
- 12. Standardized Definitions The new law requires HHS to promulgate regulations providing for the development of standardized definitions of terms used in insured plans. The required four-page plan summary previously must include these definitions, to enable participants to better understand and compare coverage. The terms for which standardized definitions are to be developed include the following. 12
- 13. Prohibition on Insured Plans Discriminating in Favor of Highly Compensated Individuals Self-insured health plans have long been subject to nondiscrimination rules prohibiting them from favoring highly compensated individuals. Those rules are set forth in Code § 105(h). The consequence of a self-insured plan failing to meet those requirements is that reimbursements are included into income of the highly compensated individuals. There will be no adverse tax consequence for highly compensated individuals, of insured plans though there may be for the employer. These provisions are subject to the grandfather rules. 13
- 14. Additional Reporting Requirement: Quality of Care By March 23, 2012, HHS will develop requirements for plans to report on a variety of issues. This reporting is to include information relating to: ▪ improving health outcomes through “quality reporting,” effective case management, care coordination, chronic disease management, and medication and care compliance initiatives, ▪ activities to prevent hospital readmissions (including through education and counseling), ▪ activities to improve patient safety and reduce medical errors through use of best clinical practices, evidence based medicine, and health information technology, and ▪ wellness and health promotion activities. 14
- 15. Cost Reporting and Limit on Insurers’ Profits Insurers (not plans) will, with respect to each plan year, be required to submit to HHS a report concerning loss ratios and expenses, including the percentage of total premium revenue expended on reimbursement for clinical services, activities that improve health care quality, and non-claims costs other than taxes, licensing, or regulatory fees. In addition, the new law effectively caps insurers’ profit margins on health insurance, beginning no later than January 1, 2011. It does so by requiring that insurers provide rebates to participants if the insurers’ premium revenues spent on reimbursement for clinical services and activities that improve health care quality are less than 85 % in the large group market, or 80% in the small group market, of the total amount of premium revenue (excluding taxes, licensing, and regulatory fees, as well as certain other payments). States may, by regulation, set a higher percentage than the 85 or 80% figures above. 15
- 16. Appeals Process. A new claims appeals process has been added. Plans will be required to have an external review process. Plans must provide participants with notice, in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner, of the available internal and external appeals processes. A plan must allow a participant to review his or her file, present evidence and testimony as part of the appeals process, and, very importantly, receive continued coverage pending outcome of the appeals process. 16
- 17. Choice of Health Care Professional If a plan provides for designation by a participant or beneficiary of a participating primary care provider, the plan must permit a participant or beneficiary to designate any participating primary care provider who is available to accept that individual. 17
- 18. Emergency Services If a plan provides or covers any benefits with respect to services in an emergency department of a hospital, the plan must cover emergency services without requiring prior authorization and must provide coverage whether or not the health care provider is a participating provider under the plan with respect to those services. A plan must provide for such coverage by a nonparticipating provider without imposing limitations on coverage more restrictive than those applicable to emergency department services from providers who have a contractual relationship with the plan. If emergency services are provided out-of-network, the cost- sharing requirement (expressed as co-payment amount or co- insurance rate) must be the same as if the services were provided in-network. 18
- 19. Pediatric Care If a plan requires, or provides for, the designation of a participating primary care provider for the child of a participant or beneficiary, the plan must permit the designation of a physician (allopathic or osteopathic) who specializes in pediatrics as the child’s primary care provider, if the provider participates in the plan’s network. This does not, however, require a plan to waive any coverage exclusions under the terms of the plan relating to the coverage of pediatric care. 19
- 20. Obstetrical and Gynecological Care A plan that provides coverage for obstetric or gynecology care and requires the designation of a participating primary care provider may not require authorization or referral by the plan or any person (including a primary care provider) in the case of a female participant or beneficiary who seeks coverage for obstetrical or gynecological care provided by a participating health care professional who specializes in obstetrics or gynecology. 20
- 21. Monitoring Insurers’ Premium Increases HHS, in conjunction with the states, is required to establish an annual review process, beginning with the 2010 plan year, for “unreasonable” increases in premiums for insured plans. Under this process, an insurer is to be required to submit a justification for any unreasonable premium increase prior to implementation of that increase. Starting with plan years beginning in 2014, the Secretary of HHS, in conjunction with the states, is to monitor premium increases, whether reasonable or unreasonable. 21
- 22. The following provisions became effective on March 23, 2010. No “Dumping” of Participants ▪ HHS to establish a temporary high risk health insurance pool program for persons with pre-existing conditions who have not had creditable coverage for at least six months. ▪ This pool is to be established no later than June 21, 2010. ▪ The pool is temporary because it will, for the most part, cease operation on January 1, 2014, when eligibility for coverage should be better available under other of the legislation’s reforms. 22
- 23. Reinsurance for Early Retirees HHS is to establish a temporary reinsurance program to reimburse employer health plans for a portion of their cost of providing health coverage to early retirees (ages 55 to 64 and their dependents. This program is to be established no later than June 21,2010. Participating plans to submit reimbursement claims and receive 80% reimbursement of costs between $15,000 and $90,000 for a covered individual, Reimbursements can only be used to reduce plan and retiree direct costs, and Program capped at $5 billion. 23
- 24. The following provisions are effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2014. Pre-existing Conditions A plan may not impose any pre-existing condition exclusion. This will be the case whether or not an individual has prior creditable coverage and whether or not the individual is a late enrollee. Although this rule is generally not effective until plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, it is effective earlier for participants (and apparently dependents) who are under age 19. For those individuals the rule is effective for plan years beginning on or after September 23, 2010. This presumably means the rules apply early to an individual who is under age 19 on the first day of the first plan year beginning on or after September 23, 2010. 24
- 25. Guaranteed Availability of Coverage In general, insurers offering coverage in a group market in a state must accept every employer in that state that applies for coverage. The insurer may, though, restrict enrollment to open or special enrollment periods, so long as it establishes special enrollment periods for COBRA qualifying events. 25
- 26. Guaranteed Renewability of Coverage Insurers offering coverage in the group market must renew or continue in force coverage at the option of the plan sponsor. 26
- 27. Wellness A new set of rules governing wellness programs. Rules are similar to those set forth in current HIPAA current regulations (Participation and standard based programs), but with refinements. HIPAA wellness program incentive limit will increase from 20% to 30% of total cost of coverage. The reward limit may be increased to 50% of the cost of coverage if deemed appropriate. 27
- 28. Cost-Sharing Insurers will be limited in the annual cost-sharing they may impose under a group health plan. For plan years beginning in 2014, a plan must not impose cost-sharing in excess of the maximum out-of pocket amount in effect for high deductible health plans for 2014. For 2015 and later years, the maximum is subject to increase. “Cost-sharing” includes (1) deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, or similar charges, and (2) any other expenditure required by a participant for a qualified medical expense with respect to essential health benefits covered under the plan. 28
- 29. Waiting Periods A plan must not apply a waiting period that exceeds 90 days. 29
- 30. Certain rules do not apply to “grandfathered plans,” or at least do not apply to certain participants in those plans. The general rule for grandfathered plans is that the requirements grouped together above under the headings “Group Health Reforms” and “Health Insurance Market Reforms” do not apply to a plan’s coverage of an individual if that individual was enrolled in the plan on March 23, 2010. In addition, the rules do not apply to family members of such a grandfathered individual who are permitted to enroll after March 23, 2010, if the enrollment of those family members was permitted under the terms of the plan as in effect on March 23, 2010, and the plan is “renewed” after March 23, 2010. 30
- 31. Further, a plan that provided coverage on March 23, 2010, may permit “new” employees (and their family members) to enroll in the plan without having the provisions of the law described to this point in the newsletter apply to those new employees (and their families). There are a number of exceptions to the general rule that the provisions grouped together above under the headings “Group Health Reforms” and “Health Insurance Market Reforms” do not apply to grandfathered plans. 31
- 32. The following rules apply to grandfather plans: The rules requiring insured plans to issue a standard plan summary (the four page “highlights” description) and use standardized definitions in that summary, and The rules requiring insured and self-insured plans to distribute summaries of material modifications 60 days in advance of any material change, apply to grandfathered plans for plan years beginning on or after March 23, 2010. 32
- 33. The following provisions also apply to grandfathered plans, and will do so at the same time they would apply to non-grandfathered plans: The waiting period rules, The restrictions on lifetime and annual limits, The rules on rescission, The pre-existing condition prohibition, and The rules on covering adult children (up to age 26) as dependents, although for plan years beginning before January 1, 2014, the rules will apply only to an adult child who is not eligible to enroll in an “eligible employer-sponsored health plan” other than the grandfathered plan. 33
- 34. ▪ For coverage maintained under a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) ratified before March 23, 2010, all new coverage and cost- sharing rules apply on the termination date of the last CBA relating to the coverage. ▪ Any coverage amendment to a CBA to comply with these rules will not be treated as terminating the CBA. 34
- 35. Large employers must provide coverage to their full-time employees or pay a financial penalty. This mandate applies beginning January 1, 2014 (technically, it applies for months beginning after December 31, 2013). 35
- 36. An employer is large if it employed an average of at least 50 full-time employees on business days during the preceding calendar year. There is, however, an exception where (1) the employer’s workforce exceeds 50 full-time employees for 120 days or fewer during the calendar year, and (2) the employees in excess of 50 employed during the 120 day period were seasonal workers. An employer must count not only its full-time employees for a month, but must add to that a number of full-time employees determined by dividing the aggregate number of hours of service of employees who are not full-time employees for the month by 120. 36
- 37. In determining an employer’s size, companies will be aggregated as a single employer under the Tax Code’s control group and similar aggregation rules. A full-time employee for this purpose is one who is employed on average at least 30 hours of service per week. HHS, in consultation with DOL, is to prescribe guidance for determining an employee’s number of hours of service, including rules for employees not compensated on an hourly basis. 37
- 38. There are two scenarios in which a large employer may be required to pay a penalty (in the form of a nondeductible excise tax). First, it will be liable for a penalty if: it fails to offer its full-time employees (and their dependents) the opportunity to enroll in “minimum essential coverage” under an “eligible employer-sponsored plan” for any month, and at least one full-time employee has been certified to the employer as having enrolled for that month in a qualified health plan with respect to which the employee is entitled to a premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction. 38
- 39. In this event, the employer must pay an amount for the month equal to the product of: the “applicable payment amount,” and the number of full-time employees employed by the employer during the month, reduced by 30 employees. The “applicable payment amount” means, with respect to any month, 1/12th of $2,000 (or $166.67). For calendar years after 2014, this dollar amount, and the other employer penalties described below, will be increased to the extent appropriate under an indexing scheme described in the new law. 39
- 40. The second way in which a large employer may be assessed a payment is where: it offers its full-time employees (and their dependents) the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage under an eligible employer-sponsored plan for a month, but (b) one or more full-time employees has been certified to the employer as having enrolled for that month in a qualified health plan with respect to which the individual is entitled to a premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction. In that event, the employer must pay an amount, but only for those full-time employees enrolled in a qualified health plan who were allowed a premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction. 40
- 41. The penalty for the month will equal the product of: the number of the employer’s full-time employees in a qualified health plan who are entitled to a premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction, and 1/12th of $3,000 (or $250). There is an overall limit on the aggregate amount of tax for any month for which the employer offers the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage. That overall limit is the product of (a) the “applicable payment amount” (1/12th of $2,000), and (b) the number of individuals employed by the employer as full-time employees during the month, reduced by 30 employees. 41
- 42. A large employer to avoid an excise tax under the employer mandate, it must offer full-time employees (and their dependents) the opportunity to enroll in “minimum essential coverage” (and it cannot have any full-time employees purchasing qualified health plans who receive a premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction). An employer must offer “affordable” health coverage to all its full-time employees (and their dependents), and the plan must be structured so participants do not pay more than 40 percent of covered claims costs. For this purpose, coverage will be considered affordable only if an employee’s premium is no more than 9.5% of the employee’s household income. 42
- 43. If a large employer fails to offer all its full-time employees affordable coverage under a plan bearing at least 60% of the cost of covered claims, the employer will likely need to pay an excise tax. An employer must pay an excise tax if any of its full-time employees purchases health insurance through the new insurance clearinghouses to be set up by the states (that is, the “exchanges”) and the employee receives a premium tax credit or cost-sharing credit from the government in that connection. 43
- 44. An employer with more than 200 full-time employees that offers employees enrollment in one or more health benefit plans must automatically enroll new full-time employees in one of those plans (subject to any permissible waiting period) and continue the enrollment of current employees. Employees must be provided with adequate notice of this automatic enrollment program and of the employees’ opportunity to opt out of coverage in which they were automatically enrolled. The effective date of this requirement is unclear. 44
- 45. New employer notice requirements informing employees of the following: Information about the state Exchanges, If plan’s share of total allowed costs of benefits is less than 60%. Availability of a tax credit. Availability of free choice vouchers, and Notice must be provided March 1, 2013 or upon subsequent hire. 45
- 46. Employer reporting to enforce individual mandate Must report whether employees were offered coverage, length of waiting period, lowest cost option, actuarial value, etc. Secretary has the authority to review for accuracy, particularly the amount of the large employer’s share of the total allowed costs under the plan (presumably for purpose of determining whether the plan had an actuarial value of more or less than 60%). Effective beginning January 1, 2014. 46
- 47. Reporting Cost of Health Coverage on W-2 Effective for years beginning after December 31, 2010, an employer must report on an employee’s W-2 the aggregate cost of the employee’s health insurance coverage sponsored by the employer, excluding the amount of any salary reduction contribution to a flexible spending arrangement. 47
- 48. Free-choice voucher Employers must offer vouchers to employees with household incomes at or below 400% of the federal poverty level (FPL) if their contribution for employer-sponsored coverage would be 8% to 9.5% of household income: Voucher amount equal to highest (percentage) employer contribution to any of its own plans. Vouchers provided for purchasing exchange-based coverage but employees could keep any excess amounts. 48
- 49. Excise tax on high-cost coverage Starting in 2018, 40% excise tax applies to value of coverage exceeding $10,200/single, $27,500/family: Stand-alone dental and vision plan coverage is not subject to the excise tax. Higher thresholds for retirees and workers in high-risk professions ($11,850 and $30,950) and for multiemployer plans ($30,950). Thresholds adjusted for age and gender. Thresholds indexed to: CPI plus 1% in 2018 - 2019. CPI in 2020 and later years. 49
- 50. Medicare Part D Discounts on brand-name drugs, Means-test for Part D premiums, and Phases in competitive bidding to base Medicare Advantage benchmarks on actual plan costs. Medicare Part D tax change starting in 2013, and Eliminates Medicare Part D donut hole, beginning with $250 rebate in 2010. 50
- 51. New Taxes Starting in 2013, Medicare payroll tax of 2.35% on employees whose annual earnings exceed $200,000 (individual) or $250,000 (couple); no change in 1.45% Medicare tax for others. Group health plan fees for federal comparative effectiveness research trust fund. Excise tax on indoor tanning services. Fees on health insurers, pharmaceutical manufacturers and medical device manufacturers. 51
- 52. Other tax increases Starting in 2013, 3.8% tax on capital gains, interest, dividends and other net investment income for taxpayers with adjusted gross income exceeding $200,000 (individual) or $250,000 (couple). 52
- 53. HSAs, Health FSAs and Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs) Starting in 2011, tougher coverage/contribution limits and penalties apply: No tax-free coverage for nonprescribed items, and Higher penalty for nonqualified HSA distributions, from 10% to 20% . Starting in 2013 Health FSA contribution $2,500. 53
- 54. Tax-free employer coverage for children who are not otherwise tax dependents Tax-free treatment for adult children who have not turned age 27 as of end of year. This change is also intended to apply to the exclusion for employer-provided coverage (that is, the value of coverage) under an accident or health plan for injuries or sickness for such a child. 54
- 55. Individual mandate Penalty calculated as lesser of these amounts: National average premium for the year, or Greater of: A percentage of income (up to 2.5% in 2016), or $325 in 2015, $695 in 2016 and indexed thereafter. 55
- 56. 56
- 57. For a COMPLIMENTARY/NO OBLIGATION analysis of your organizations employee benefits plan, please contact: George Gountanis Benefits Consultant Forest Financial Group, Inc. 1650 W. 45th Ave, Suite B Munster, IN 46321 (219) 924-4800 Or by email: [email protected] 57
- 58. Information provided by: Larry Grudzien Attorney at Law Email: [email protected] Website: larrygrudzien.com 58