HEPATITIS B INFECTION IN CKD 
PATIENTS 
Dr AJISH JOHN
Introduction 
HBV infection in CKD patients presents a distinct 
clinical problem. 
immunosuppressive effect of renal failure 
Susceptibility for de novo infection and nosocomial 
transmission 
long-term implications on morbidity and mortality 
change in clinical course after kidney transplantation.
Natural history vary according to the timing of 
infection, genotype, and locality. 
Endemic areas – mostly carriers who acquired 
infection during childhood 
Non-endemic areas – acquired during adulthood.
HEMODIALYSIS & CAPD IN HEPATITIS B 
INFECTION
Peculiarities of HBV in dialysis patients 
more prone to become chronic carriers due to their 
immunosuppressed state. 
Relatively mild clinical course. 
Infection often asymptomatic 
Normal or only slight elevation of transaminase.
Incidence & Prevalence 
Factors causing decreasing prevelance of HBV 
infection in dialysis patients – 
Screening of blood products for HBsAg and anti-HBc 
Implementation of infection control measures 
Reduced need for transfusion after the advent of 
erythropoietin 
Hepatitis B vaccination
HBsAg positivity rates in dialysis patients 
correlate with endemicity in the general 
population. 
1% in United States 
5.9% in Italy 
12% in Brazil 
1.3-14.6% in Asian Pacific countries
RISK FACTORS FOR HBV INFECTION IN 
DIALYSIS UNITS 
Presence of HBsAg positive patients within the same 
dialysis unit 
Nonsegregation with dedicated hemodialysis 
machines for HBsAg positive patients 
Lower prevalence rate of hepatitis B vaccination 
among dialysis patients in the same unit
Even in HBsAg-negative dialysis patients with a 
history of resolved HBV infection, minute amounts of 
transcriptionally active HBV DNA could be detected 
by PCR 
This phenomenon is associated with deletions in the 
pre-S1 region of the viral genome, which affected the 
S promoter, thereby reducing the production of 
HBsAg.
Although HBV DNA traverses the dialyzer membrane 
during high flux dialysis, the degree of infectivity of 
dialysate and ultrafiltrate remains controversial. 
Patients on peritoneal dialysis have a lower risk of 
acquiring HBV infection compared to those on long-term 
hemodialysis.
DIAGNOSIS OF HBV INFECTION 
HBsAg is sufficient for the diagnosis of HBV 
infection 
Quantitative real-time PCR assays for HBV DNA 
offer increased sensitivity with detection threshold 
down to 20 IU or 102 copies/mL. 
Occult HBV infection – neg HBsAg
Occult HBV infection – 
positivity in nested PCR assays for the pre-S/S, pre- 
Core/Core, and X viral regions with sensitivity down 
to 10 copies/mL.
Recommended HBV testing in MHD
PREVENTION MEASURES 
Universal precautionary measures 
Hemodialysis unit procedures for the prevention 
of blood borne infections 
Hepatitis B vaccination
Barrier procedures to prevent exposure to blood 
borne microorganisms :- 
Washing hands after contact with potentially 
infectious surface or material 
Wearing gloves when contacting potentially 
infectious surface or material 
Wearing a face mask and gown when exposure to 
blood or body fluids is expected
Segregation and reuse of dialyzers 
Machine segregation & separate HD room is now 
standard practice. 
Dialyzer reuse was also not associated with a higher 
risk of HBV infection both in patients and in staff. 
CDC recommendation - dialyzers from HBsAg-positive 
patients be excluded from reuse programs
Hepatitis B vaccination 
Risk of HBV infection reduced by 70% with 
vaccination. 
CDC recommend routine vaccination in all dialysis 
patients.
Arguments against vaccination – 
Reduced efficacy of vaccine in ESRD – 
Seroconversion – only 50-60% 
Immune response correlate with degree of renal 
failure 
Low rate of HBV infection (0.12% among HD pts)
Vaccination failure – 
Anti HBsAg titer ≤ 10 IU/L 
(1-2 months after completion of vaccination 
schedule)
Measures to enhance immune response – 
Double vaccine dose (40mcg/dose) 
Administer in deltoid 
Additional doses (0,1,2,6 months) 
Administer early before GFR declines
Administer additional three dose series to dialysis 
patients with vaccination failure 
Administer single booster dose of 40mcg if antibody 
titer fall to ≤ 10 IU/L after initial response. 
Intradermal vs intramuscular 
Role of adjuvants
An accelerated schedule of 0, 7, 21 days and 12 
months may be used. 
Post vaccination serological testing - 3 months 
after the third dose of hepatitis B vaccine. 
Anti-HBs levels >10mIU/ml are considered to be 
protective.
Due to chance of spurious seropositivity for HBsAg, 
testing of serum for HBsAg should be avoided within 
3 weeks of vaccination. 
No role for repeated boosters in those whose 
antibody titers remain ≤ 10 IU/L. 
Despite vaccination the most important factor in 
preventing spread of HBV is - Maintenance of 
universal precautions.
CAPD in Hepatitis B patients 
Preferred modality of RRT in HBV infected CKD patients. 
Avoids risk to health personnel 
Economic, avoids segregation, no risk to other patients 
Easy to dispose PD fluid effluent 
Minimal risk to household members.
CAPD in Cirrhotic patients – 
No increased risk of CAPD peritonitis 
Avoids risk of heparinisation 
Provides added calorie 
Increased protein loss
Method of disinfection of CAPD bags & effluent - 
A cupful of household bleach should be poured into 
the toilet and the bag drained into this. 
The toilet should be flushed after 5 min. 
The emptied CAPD bags should be placed in a 
plastic bag to which a small quantity of bleach has 
been added.
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS 
Upper limit of transaminases in dialysis pts – 
SGOT < 24 IU/L 
SGPT < 17 IU/L
Acute infection 
Extremely variable manifestations 
Majority – 
Asymptomatic 
Mild symptoms 
Only mild elevation of transaminases
Serotype may affect severity 
Precore mutants have severe presentation 
Majority become chronic carriers (80%)
Chronic infection 
Manifestation of chronic infection or cirrhosis in 
dialysis pts identical to those without renal failure. 
Aminotransferase level should to interpreted 
accordingly. 
Screen for Hepatitis D virus coinfection. 
Histological evidence of chronic hepatitis in 30% of 
dialysis pts with HBV infection.
Prior to availability of nucleoside analogues clinical 
outcome in dialysis patients were inferior. 
Only less than 5% of dialysis pts with chronic HBV 
die of liver disease. 
Majority of death is due to CVDs.
Cirrhosis associated with 35% increase in mortality 
rate among dialysis pts. 
Whether HBV infection has adverse effect on patient 
survival is controversial.
MANAGEMENT OF HBV IN CKD
Periodic monitering - 
ALT/AST, Albumin every six to eight week intervals. 
USG abdomen to assess liver & αFP annually.
Elastography to assess liver stiffness – role not 
established. 
Role of Liver Biopsy – 
Best assess activity, extent of cirrhotic changes 
Recommended prior to antiviral treatment 
Preferred prior to renal transplantation
Decision to treat HBV – 
Abnormal AST & ALT 
HBV DNA 
> 105 copies/ml or 20,000 IU/ml ( if HBeAg +ve) 
> 104 copies/ml or 2,000 IU/ml (if HBeAg –ve) 
Based on liver biopsy – if cirrhosis or not
Based on – 
AASLD Guideline (2009) 
EASL Guideline (2009)
AASLD GUIDELINE
Interferon α – 10 MU s/c thrice weekly 
Pegylated Interferon α 
Peg IFN α 2a – 180μg s/c weekly 
Peg IFN α 2b – 1 μg/kg s/c weekly 
Nucleoside/nucleotide analogues 
Lamivudine – 100mg/d 
Adefovir – 10mg/d 
Tenofovir – 300mg/d 
Entecavir – 0.5mg/d 
Telbivudine – 600mg/d
Duration of treatment 
Drug HBeAg +ve HBeAg -ve 
Interferon α 16 wks 1 yr 
Lamivudine 1 yr > 1yr
Interferon α 
Little data among dialysis patients. 
3 MU thrice weekly 
Due to decreased clearance in ESRD pts – longer 
t1/2 
Side effects are more pronounced in dialysis pts. 
Exacerbation of anemia and protein malnutrition.
Pegylated IFN 
Efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon in ESRD 
and dialysis patients not defined. 
HD has only negligible effects on clearance of 
pegylated IFN. 
Pegylated IFN not tolerated by majority of HD pts in 
small trials. 
is best avoided in HD pts.
Nucleoside/nucleotide analogues 
Lamivudine 
Useful in dialysis pts & post Tx 
Normalise AST&ALT - >80% 
HBeAg clearance – 20% 
Suppress HBV DNA to undetectable level – 50-90%
Selection of drug resistant variants - YMDD 
15% of pts after 12 months of Rx. 
No longer regarded as preferred first line therapy. 
Dose in ESRD – 25mg/day
Entecavir 
Recommended first line oral therapy in pts with renal 
disease. 
Dose in ESRD on dialysis – 
0.05mg/d or 0.5mg/wk 
0.1mg/d or 1mg/wk (lamivudine resistant HBV)
Adefovir & Tenofovir – 
Nephrotoxic 
Lead to renal tubular dysfunction 
Preferably avoided in dialysis pts with residual renal 
function.
Rx in Lamivudine resistant HBV – 
Adefovir add on therapy 
Tenofovir – more effective than adefovir 
Entecavir – recommended therapy in ESRD pts 
Preferably avoid adefovir & tenofovir due to their 
nephrotoxic potential.
Start effective treatment early after emergence of 
lamivudine resistance. 
Helps to prevent hepatitic flares 
Reduce risk of subsequent development of multiple 
drug resistance.
HBV infection in Renal transplant 
recipients
Prevelance in endemic areas – 15% 
Declining trend due to HBV vaccination 
All patients undergoing renal transplantation should 
be tested for HBV DNA & HBeAg prior to Tx.
HBsAg positivity is associated with increased risk of 
death and allograft loss. 
Liver disease is a leading cause of death among 
renal transplant recipients with c/c HBV. 
With advent of antiviral therapy overall prognosis has 
improved.
HBV infection with ESRD can be recommended for 
Renal Tx only if they do not have cirrhosis. 
If Cirrhosis present – Combined liver & kidney 
Tx required.
All HBsAg +ve candidates for solid-organ Tx should 
be treated with NAs before Tx. 
to maintain undetectable HBV DNA, reduce liver 
fibrosis & prevent hepatic decompensation after Tx. 
( EASL clinical practice Guidelines )
Risk factors for reactivation 
Due to immunosuppressive therapy 
Status of recipient – serologic & virologic markers 
Serologic & virologic status of donor – risk factor for 
de novo HBV infection.
Donor Recepient Risk 
HBsAg +ve HBsAg –ve +++ 
HBsAg –ve 
Anti HBc +ve 
HBsAg –ve ++ 
HBsAg +ve Anti HBc +ve +
Increase in HBV DNA precede transaminitis. 
Result in hepatitis flares 
Decreased allograft & patient survival 
Risk of hepatic failure & death
Preventive therapy 
Recommended for all patients with HBV infection 
undergoing renal Tx. 
2 approaches to prevent post Tx HBV reactivation – 
1. Prophylactic strategy 
2. Preemptive strategy
Preemptive strategy 
Periodic monitoring for viremia after Tx 
Prompt Rx after detection or marked rise of HBV 
DNA in PCR. 
Require close monitoring which may not always be 
clinically feasible.
Prophylactic strategy 
Administration of antiviral agents to patients at increased 
risk of reactivation. 
Given either prior to or immediately after Tx. 
Whom to give ? 
Those pior to TX – 
+ve HBeAg 
detectable HBV DNA
Duration of antiviral prophylaxis – 
No definite consensus 
Atleast first 2 years (KDIGO) 
continue for as long as immunosuppressive therapy 
lasts. (Shibolet et al)
Either preemptive or prophylactic strategy provides 
superior outcomes compared with treatment only 
after clinically significant reactivation of HBV. 
Hence preventive therapy is recommended to renal 
Tx recepients infected with HBV.
Rx after hepatic dysfunction or transaminitis is 
detected - 
less effective in preventing hepatic flares or 
decompensation 
than either preventive strategy.
Antiviral agent – 
Entecavir – agent of choice 
Lamivudine 
Interferon therapy is contraindicated due to risk of 
acute rejection and low antiviral potency.
Effective NA therapy increased patient (81–89%) 
and graft survival (86%) at 10 years. 
Due to inhibition of viral replication, retardation of 
liver disease progression & lower incidence of 
hepatocellular carcinoma.
Pts with detectable HBV DNA prior to Tx 
PROPHYLACTIC THERAPY 
Prior to or at time of Tx. 
Preferred agent - ENTECAVIR
Pts infected with HBV but without detectable HBV 
DNA prior to Tx 
PREEMPTIVE STRATEGY 
Moniter HBV DNA every 3 months for 1st year and 
then every 6 months 
Entecavir is initiated when HBV DNA become 
detectable or increase progressively.
Pts with anti HBcAg +ve but HBsAg neg 
PREEMPTIVE STRATEGY 
Monitor ALT if transaminitis 
Check HBV DNA
All patients with e/o HBV infection pre Tx should 
be closely monitered for viral relapse, hepatitis 
flare. 
Liver biopsy can guide decision regarding 
antiviral treatment in post Tx patients.
HBV-positive renal transplant donors 
Kidneys from HBsAg +ve, but even from HBsAg-neg, 
anti-HBc +ve donors are not promoted. 
Due to potential to transmit HBV to recipient
HBsAg-negative recipients receiving grafts from anti- 
HBc +ve donors – 
Lamivudine prophylaxis 
Anti-HBsAg +ve recipients receiving grafts from 
HBsAg +ve donors – 
Lamivudine combined with immunoglobulin
Hepatitis B infection in Chronic Kidneydisease

Hepatitis B infection in Chronic Kidneydisease

  • 1.
    HEPATITIS B INFECTIONIN CKD PATIENTS Dr AJISH JOHN
  • 2.
    Introduction HBV infectionin CKD patients presents a distinct clinical problem. immunosuppressive effect of renal failure Susceptibility for de novo infection and nosocomial transmission long-term implications on morbidity and mortality change in clinical course after kidney transplantation.
  • 3.
    Natural history varyaccording to the timing of infection, genotype, and locality. Endemic areas – mostly carriers who acquired infection during childhood Non-endemic areas – acquired during adulthood.
  • 4.
    HEMODIALYSIS & CAPDIN HEPATITIS B INFECTION
  • 5.
    Peculiarities of HBVin dialysis patients more prone to become chronic carriers due to their immunosuppressed state. Relatively mild clinical course. Infection often asymptomatic Normal or only slight elevation of transaminase.
  • 6.
    Incidence & Prevalence Factors causing decreasing prevelance of HBV infection in dialysis patients – Screening of blood products for HBsAg and anti-HBc Implementation of infection control measures Reduced need for transfusion after the advent of erythropoietin Hepatitis B vaccination
  • 7.
    HBsAg positivity ratesin dialysis patients correlate with endemicity in the general population. 1% in United States 5.9% in Italy 12% in Brazil 1.3-14.6% in Asian Pacific countries
  • 8.
    RISK FACTORS FORHBV INFECTION IN DIALYSIS UNITS Presence of HBsAg positive patients within the same dialysis unit Nonsegregation with dedicated hemodialysis machines for HBsAg positive patients Lower prevalence rate of hepatitis B vaccination among dialysis patients in the same unit
  • 9.
    Even in HBsAg-negativedialysis patients with a history of resolved HBV infection, minute amounts of transcriptionally active HBV DNA could be detected by PCR This phenomenon is associated with deletions in the pre-S1 region of the viral genome, which affected the S promoter, thereby reducing the production of HBsAg.
  • 10.
    Although HBV DNAtraverses the dialyzer membrane during high flux dialysis, the degree of infectivity of dialysate and ultrafiltrate remains controversial. Patients on peritoneal dialysis have a lower risk of acquiring HBV infection compared to those on long-term hemodialysis.
  • 11.
    DIAGNOSIS OF HBVINFECTION HBsAg is sufficient for the diagnosis of HBV infection Quantitative real-time PCR assays for HBV DNA offer increased sensitivity with detection threshold down to 20 IU or 102 copies/mL. Occult HBV infection – neg HBsAg
  • 12.
    Occult HBV infection– positivity in nested PCR assays for the pre-S/S, pre- Core/Core, and X viral regions with sensitivity down to 10 copies/mL.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    PREVENTION MEASURES Universalprecautionary measures Hemodialysis unit procedures for the prevention of blood borne infections Hepatitis B vaccination
  • 15.
    Barrier procedures toprevent exposure to blood borne microorganisms :- Washing hands after contact with potentially infectious surface or material Wearing gloves when contacting potentially infectious surface or material Wearing a face mask and gown when exposure to blood or body fluids is expected
  • 16.
    Segregation and reuseof dialyzers Machine segregation & separate HD room is now standard practice. Dialyzer reuse was also not associated with a higher risk of HBV infection both in patients and in staff. CDC recommendation - dialyzers from HBsAg-positive patients be excluded from reuse programs
  • 17.
    Hepatitis B vaccination Risk of HBV infection reduced by 70% with vaccination. CDC recommend routine vaccination in all dialysis patients.
  • 18.
    Arguments against vaccination– Reduced efficacy of vaccine in ESRD – Seroconversion – only 50-60% Immune response correlate with degree of renal failure Low rate of HBV infection (0.12% among HD pts)
  • 19.
    Vaccination failure – Anti HBsAg titer ≤ 10 IU/L (1-2 months after completion of vaccination schedule)
  • 20.
    Measures to enhanceimmune response – Double vaccine dose (40mcg/dose) Administer in deltoid Additional doses (0,1,2,6 months) Administer early before GFR declines
  • 21.
    Administer additional threedose series to dialysis patients with vaccination failure Administer single booster dose of 40mcg if antibody titer fall to ≤ 10 IU/L after initial response. Intradermal vs intramuscular Role of adjuvants
  • 22.
    An accelerated scheduleof 0, 7, 21 days and 12 months may be used. Post vaccination serological testing - 3 months after the third dose of hepatitis B vaccine. Anti-HBs levels >10mIU/ml are considered to be protective.
  • 23.
    Due to chanceof spurious seropositivity for HBsAg, testing of serum for HBsAg should be avoided within 3 weeks of vaccination. No role for repeated boosters in those whose antibody titers remain ≤ 10 IU/L. Despite vaccination the most important factor in preventing spread of HBV is - Maintenance of universal precautions.
  • 24.
    CAPD in HepatitisB patients Preferred modality of RRT in HBV infected CKD patients. Avoids risk to health personnel Economic, avoids segregation, no risk to other patients Easy to dispose PD fluid effluent Minimal risk to household members.
  • 25.
    CAPD in Cirrhoticpatients – No increased risk of CAPD peritonitis Avoids risk of heparinisation Provides added calorie Increased protein loss
  • 26.
    Method of disinfectionof CAPD bags & effluent - A cupful of household bleach should be poured into the toilet and the bag drained into this. The toilet should be flushed after 5 min. The emptied CAPD bags should be placed in a plastic bag to which a small quantity of bleach has been added.
  • 27.
    CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS Upperlimit of transaminases in dialysis pts – SGOT < 24 IU/L SGPT < 17 IU/L
  • 28.
    Acute infection Extremelyvariable manifestations Majority – Asymptomatic Mild symptoms Only mild elevation of transaminases
  • 29.
    Serotype may affectseverity Precore mutants have severe presentation Majority become chronic carriers (80%)
  • 30.
    Chronic infection Manifestationof chronic infection or cirrhosis in dialysis pts identical to those without renal failure. Aminotransferase level should to interpreted accordingly. Screen for Hepatitis D virus coinfection. Histological evidence of chronic hepatitis in 30% of dialysis pts with HBV infection.
  • 31.
    Prior to availabilityof nucleoside analogues clinical outcome in dialysis patients were inferior. Only less than 5% of dialysis pts with chronic HBV die of liver disease. Majority of death is due to CVDs.
  • 32.
    Cirrhosis associated with35% increase in mortality rate among dialysis pts. Whether HBV infection has adverse effect on patient survival is controversial.
  • 33.
  • 34.
    Periodic monitering - ALT/AST, Albumin every six to eight week intervals. USG abdomen to assess liver & αFP annually.
  • 35.
    Elastography to assessliver stiffness – role not established. Role of Liver Biopsy – Best assess activity, extent of cirrhotic changes Recommended prior to antiviral treatment Preferred prior to renal transplantation
  • 36.
    Decision to treatHBV – Abnormal AST & ALT HBV DNA > 105 copies/ml or 20,000 IU/ml ( if HBeAg +ve) > 104 copies/ml or 2,000 IU/ml (if HBeAg –ve) Based on liver biopsy – if cirrhosis or not
  • 37.
    Based on – AASLD Guideline (2009) EASL Guideline (2009)
  • 38.
  • 40.
    Interferon α –10 MU s/c thrice weekly Pegylated Interferon α Peg IFN α 2a – 180μg s/c weekly Peg IFN α 2b – 1 μg/kg s/c weekly Nucleoside/nucleotide analogues Lamivudine – 100mg/d Adefovir – 10mg/d Tenofovir – 300mg/d Entecavir – 0.5mg/d Telbivudine – 600mg/d
  • 41.
    Duration of treatment Drug HBeAg +ve HBeAg -ve Interferon α 16 wks 1 yr Lamivudine 1 yr > 1yr
  • 45.
    Interferon α Littledata among dialysis patients. 3 MU thrice weekly Due to decreased clearance in ESRD pts – longer t1/2 Side effects are more pronounced in dialysis pts. Exacerbation of anemia and protein malnutrition.
  • 46.
    Pegylated IFN Efficacyand safety of pegylated interferon in ESRD and dialysis patients not defined. HD has only negligible effects on clearance of pegylated IFN. Pegylated IFN not tolerated by majority of HD pts in small trials. is best avoided in HD pts.
  • 47.
    Nucleoside/nucleotide analogues Lamivudine Useful in dialysis pts & post Tx Normalise AST&ALT - >80% HBeAg clearance – 20% Suppress HBV DNA to undetectable level – 50-90%
  • 48.
    Selection of drugresistant variants - YMDD 15% of pts after 12 months of Rx. No longer regarded as preferred first line therapy. Dose in ESRD – 25mg/day
  • 49.
    Entecavir Recommended firstline oral therapy in pts with renal disease. Dose in ESRD on dialysis – 0.05mg/d or 0.5mg/wk 0.1mg/d or 1mg/wk (lamivudine resistant HBV)
  • 50.
    Adefovir & Tenofovir– Nephrotoxic Lead to renal tubular dysfunction Preferably avoided in dialysis pts with residual renal function.
  • 51.
    Rx in Lamivudineresistant HBV – Adefovir add on therapy Tenofovir – more effective than adefovir Entecavir – recommended therapy in ESRD pts Preferably avoid adefovir & tenofovir due to their nephrotoxic potential.
  • 52.
    Start effective treatmentearly after emergence of lamivudine resistance. Helps to prevent hepatitic flares Reduce risk of subsequent development of multiple drug resistance.
  • 53.
    HBV infection inRenal transplant recipients
  • 54.
    Prevelance in endemicareas – 15% Declining trend due to HBV vaccination All patients undergoing renal transplantation should be tested for HBV DNA & HBeAg prior to Tx.
  • 55.
    HBsAg positivity isassociated with increased risk of death and allograft loss. Liver disease is a leading cause of death among renal transplant recipients with c/c HBV. With advent of antiviral therapy overall prognosis has improved.
  • 56.
    HBV infection withESRD can be recommended for Renal Tx only if they do not have cirrhosis. If Cirrhosis present – Combined liver & kidney Tx required.
  • 57.
    All HBsAg +vecandidates for solid-organ Tx should be treated with NAs before Tx. to maintain undetectable HBV DNA, reduce liver fibrosis & prevent hepatic decompensation after Tx. ( EASL clinical practice Guidelines )
  • 58.
    Risk factors forreactivation Due to immunosuppressive therapy Status of recipient – serologic & virologic markers Serologic & virologic status of donor – risk factor for de novo HBV infection.
  • 59.
    Donor Recepient Risk HBsAg +ve HBsAg –ve +++ HBsAg –ve Anti HBc +ve HBsAg –ve ++ HBsAg +ve Anti HBc +ve +
  • 60.
    Increase in HBVDNA precede transaminitis. Result in hepatitis flares Decreased allograft & patient survival Risk of hepatic failure & death
  • 61.
    Preventive therapy Recommendedfor all patients with HBV infection undergoing renal Tx. 2 approaches to prevent post Tx HBV reactivation – 1. Prophylactic strategy 2. Preemptive strategy
  • 62.
    Preemptive strategy Periodicmonitoring for viremia after Tx Prompt Rx after detection or marked rise of HBV DNA in PCR. Require close monitoring which may not always be clinically feasible.
  • 63.
    Prophylactic strategy Administrationof antiviral agents to patients at increased risk of reactivation. Given either prior to or immediately after Tx. Whom to give ? Those pior to TX – +ve HBeAg detectable HBV DNA
  • 64.
    Duration of antiviralprophylaxis – No definite consensus Atleast first 2 years (KDIGO) continue for as long as immunosuppressive therapy lasts. (Shibolet et al)
  • 65.
    Either preemptive orprophylactic strategy provides superior outcomes compared with treatment only after clinically significant reactivation of HBV. Hence preventive therapy is recommended to renal Tx recepients infected with HBV.
  • 66.
    Rx after hepaticdysfunction or transaminitis is detected - less effective in preventing hepatic flares or decompensation than either preventive strategy.
  • 67.
    Antiviral agent – Entecavir – agent of choice Lamivudine Interferon therapy is contraindicated due to risk of acute rejection and low antiviral potency.
  • 68.
    Effective NA therapyincreased patient (81–89%) and graft survival (86%) at 10 years. Due to inhibition of viral replication, retardation of liver disease progression & lower incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma.
  • 69.
    Pts with detectableHBV DNA prior to Tx PROPHYLACTIC THERAPY Prior to or at time of Tx. Preferred agent - ENTECAVIR
  • 70.
    Pts infected withHBV but without detectable HBV DNA prior to Tx PREEMPTIVE STRATEGY Moniter HBV DNA every 3 months for 1st year and then every 6 months Entecavir is initiated when HBV DNA become detectable or increase progressively.
  • 71.
    Pts with antiHBcAg +ve but HBsAg neg PREEMPTIVE STRATEGY Monitor ALT if transaminitis Check HBV DNA
  • 72.
    All patients withe/o HBV infection pre Tx should be closely monitered for viral relapse, hepatitis flare. Liver biopsy can guide decision regarding antiviral treatment in post Tx patients.
  • 73.
    HBV-positive renal transplantdonors Kidneys from HBsAg +ve, but even from HBsAg-neg, anti-HBc +ve donors are not promoted. Due to potential to transmit HBV to recipient
  • 74.
    HBsAg-negative recipients receivinggrafts from anti- HBc +ve donors – Lamivudine prophylaxis Anti-HBsAg +ve recipients receiving grafts from HBsAg +ve donors – Lamivudine combined with immunoglobulin