Heritage Proceedings Distribution PDF

1
Presented by the
Kitchener-Waterloo
Association of
REALTORS®
(KWAR),
in co-operation with
Architectural
Conservancy Ontario
North Waterloo
Region, and
sponsored by the
Regional Municipality
of Waterloo on
February 3, 2016 at
the Registry Theatre
in Kitchener, ON.
The Economics of
HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT

2
The “Economics of Heritage Development” event was presented by the Kitchener-Waterloo
Association of REALTORS®
(KWAR), in co-operation with the Architectural Conservancy of
Ontario North Waterloo Region, and sponsored by the Regional Municipality of Waterloo on
February 3, 2016 at the Registry Theatre in Kitchener, ON.
Dr. Robert Shipley, an internationally recognized expert in built and cultural heritage, made a
presentation on the economics of heritage development in Ontario. Shipley is the author of a
number of studies related to the topic, most notably “The Lazarus Effect: An exploration of
the economics of heritage development in Ontario.”1
Dr. Robert Shipley began his remarks by recognizing that the majority of built and cultural
heritage in Canada is largely of colonial origin, and we should recognize the importance of
Aboriginal heritage. In addition, we must remember that preservation is not the priority for
heritage development, but that conservation is critical to our future success.
Panellists (from left to right): Peter Smith, President of Andrin Homes; Shawky Fahel, President of
JG Group of Companies; Dr. Robert Shipley; Jeff Zavitz, co-owner of Tavis-Roland Development
Inc.; Craig Beattie, co-founder of Perimeter Development Corporation.

3
Heritage should be considered an asset, which requires
political will, developer support and a desire to conserve
in order to retain structures for future redevelopment and
expansion.

4
Shipley elaborated that preservation implies that we seek to limit change, while conservation
acknowledges the importance of change balanced with retaining identity, character and key
features. We must conserve the value of heritage.
In 1880, the United Kingdom Society for the Preservation of Ancient Buildings was formed,
becoming the first official organization to acknowledge the importance of heritage. Later in
1964, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization published the
Venice Charter, laying the foundation for an international treaty on heritage conservation in
1974. The following year, the Ontario Heritage Act gave municipalities power to regulate
heritage conservation, and formed the basis for our present-day system. It put into place a
common review process for designation and changes to structures, and is now supported by
the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) and Planning Act, which require the consideration of
heritage.
Dr. Shipley said that it is important to not only conserve grand architecture but also smaller
structures or groups of structures that contribute to the heritage fabric. This goal can be
achieved through individual designation, the creation of special planning districts or the
implementation of general by-laws. He noted that it is also important to clarify that heritage
designation allows for the management of change to a property, but does not prevent the
sale of land, change of use, or limits to public access. It simply allows for a consultation
process to occur, ensuring the conservation of identified resources.
Heritage designation is achieved through the application of nine criteria, the main
components of which are related to the design value of the structure, the historical value of
the structure, and the contextual value to the community.

5
Age is not the sole determining factor in designating heritage structures or areas. For
example, an older residence that was once home to a significant person, may not have high
design or contextual value, but would have significant historical value. Alternatively, a large
mid-20th
century civic building designed with a rare architectural style would be valued for its
design and contextual value, but not for its historical value.
The Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO) and University of Waterloo’s Heritage
Resources Centre undertook research to examine 64 Heritage Conservation Districts (HCD)2
in Ontario. They found that designated heritage property values rose at a higher rate than
comparable non-designated ones, and also sold faster. Changes in the Heritage Conservation
area was stabilized, and overall, the majority of residents were satisfied and supportive of the
policies implemented.

6
There is a significant focus on heritage resources that have been officially recognized,
however the majority of heritage resources are not designated or formally recognized in any
way. These resources still contribute to the character of a community, and provide an area
with an intangible visual style. These buildings are more likely to be incorporated into new
developments, while still working to conserve the heritage of an area. For example, the use of
a building may change or be physically expanded, but often certain key features are
preserved. It is about giving new life to older buildings to conserve the character of an area.
The largest problem for heritage conservation in Ontario is the default response to demolish
existing structures when redeveloping a site. We should be changing the conversation to ask
if demolition is truly needed and focus instead on conserving already built forms. There is an
intangible value created by heritage. The context of the past provides the identity of the
present. Heritage should be considered an asset, which requires political will, developer
support and a desire to conserve in order to retain structures for future redevelopment and
expansion. The economic benefit and cost of adaptive reuse is comparable to new
development, but the return on investment and consumer demand is significantly higher
for redevelopment projects that involve historic properties.
Other barriers to implementing a successful heritage conservation market are an uncertainty
in financing options, and a lack of support from banks and lenders. The majority of projects
must be either self-financed or privately financed to secure funds. The pursuit of long-term
tenants can ensure financial viability in the future. Furthermore, a lack of communication and
contradiction between different regulators and government departments results in project
delays, lack of guidance and confusion for proponents. In addition, the shortage of skilled
labour in the industry and lack of appreciation for practical building techniques limits
potential redevelopment. Finally, better provincial and federal granting programs combined
with tax relief at all levels would provide a larger incentive for developers to undertake
adaptive reuse projects.
In conclusion, the formal heritage conservation process should be improved to provide
certainty and incentives to drive developers, while heritage advocates should recognize and
work with their allies in the development industry to deliver high-quality outcomes.

7
Heritage Developers
Panel Q&A

8
The panel was moderated by Dr. Robert Shipley and consisted of Craig Beattie, co-founder of
the Perimeter Development Corporation; Peter Smith, president of Andrin Homes; Shawky
Fahel, president of the JG Group; and, Jeff Zavitz, co-owner of Tavis-Roland Developments.
The main themes discussed during the Q&A panel focused on the value of heritage, taxation
and incentives, regulatory challenges, and project risk management.
What are the conditions that make adaptive reuse
successful? What are the biggest challenges?
Just as with any other real estate transaction, the key factors are location and market demand.
Market drives the determination of after uses. You need to be in the right place and have the
demand to support the development. Projects viable for adaptive reuse are often located in
urban centres. Structures are sought that have “good bones”; developers need be flexible and
willing to adapt their vision of the project to suit the particular structure. Structurally sound
buildings allow for the largest potential of adaptive reuse. A collaborative relationship with
local municipalities is also needed. Older structures are part of our heritage and part of our
history. It is important to revitalize older structures and create new uses while retaining our
heritage.
The biggest challenge to adaptive reuse can be the “hidden surprises” in a project, and so it is
wise to have a strong contingency fund. For example, many industrial buildings have poor
insulation and their existing structure may not have been designed to support the loads
required of new uses. Contaminated sites are also often a factor in adaptively reused
structures, and can limit the potential uses if remediation is not done correctly. Lack of
cooperation between agencies is another significant barrier to developers taking risks on
executing stellar projects.

9
Is heritage designation an issue for adaptive reuse
projects? Are the heritage related challenges more or
less risky, and is the reward worth the risk?
Designated buildings often have the most character, are often located in urban centres and
provide benefits to return on investment (ROI). We are also witnessing an urban renaissance
that drives renewal and development within the urban core. Layering the character of
designated structures with newer development results in a unique product that stands out in
the marketplace.
Having a personal interest in the structure can be a motivation and help in solving any
heritage related issues. It is important to take a long-term perspective on these properties,
and not view them as quick turnover projects.
Buildings of interest and designated buildings provide for unique opportunities. It is a myth
that adaptive reuse reduces ROI, older buildings are often cheaper as they are already
constructed, and often with materials and practices that far exceed todays standards.
Every situation and development is unique so a guaranteed ROI or lower costs on adaptive
reuse structures can vary greatly. Remediation costs on The Kaufman Lofts were higher but
surface parking was provided instead of an underground parking lot, which reduced costs per
unit. Renovation costs on heritage buildings can often exceed estimates, but if there is a
sound structure with little contamination, projects can have significantly reduced costs. Sites
are unique and should be treated as such.
Is heritage a selling feature?
You cannot reproduce history, story and context in new buildings, lending the advantage to
older structures. In addition, the building styles and techniques are often more detailed than
modern structures. People will often pay a premium to live within a heritage structure, but it
is important to recognize there are trade-offs that occur, such as parking, windows, space and
unit customization. In addition, site constraints often play into decisions, as well as local
community concerns and competition with other options in the area.

10
It is important to take a long-term
perspective on these properties, and
not view them as quick-turnover
projects.

11
Do you actively seek properties with cultural heritage
value, and if so why?
Developers look for opportunities, and heritage buildings tend to provide more of an
opportunity to complete good projects. Heritage properties are never looked at as a
detractor to the project, but the business case accounts for the decision to purchase a
property, like any other project.
Unique well-located buildings often have a heritage designation, and tend to have strong
design and community character. However, for most developers, finding heritage designated
properties is not an active part of the site selection process. In the end, developers all want to
showcase good architecture and we are learning as we go. Diversity is needed in the core,
with active thought given to not homogenizing everything that is developed. Sometimes sites
are purchased defensively to avoid a development completely ruining the character of the
area. It is always about good design that complements, but does not completely mimic, the
existing structures.
At what stage and in what capacity do you bring
heritage professionals onto projects? How can a
heritage committee assist developers in project
success?
Developers often invite stakeholders to the process early to share the project vision with
them in an informal setting. It is important to establish professionalism at meetings with
heritage consultants to reduce the lack of trust between groups. More education needs to be
provided related to inspecting heritage projects, and it is important to build consensus
between developers and heritage advocates.

12
In the United States, there are significant tax credits provided and
heritage preservation is a business that requires professionals from
day one. Canada, with a conservation-style model, is more
collaborative and negotiable, but all levels of government need to
work together to create a better heritage business.

13
Green technology, LEED and local material reuse can be a good way to reintegrate the
heritage structure into a new project. Developers often hire external consultants to assist in
working out the details, benefiting both the proponent and municipality.
In the United States, there are significant tax credits provided and heritage preservation is a
business that requires professionals from day one. Canada, with a conservation-style model, is
more collaborative and negotiable, but all levels of government need to work together to
create a better heritage business.
What can heritage activists do to better support
developers?
The National Trust for Canada has provided support, but we need to look at it from a public
policy perspective, and have activists support the issue. In the United States, the federal
heritage tax credit has leveraged a significant amount of investment, and driven businesses in
the heritage redevelopment industry. A cap and trade style model needs to be adopted for
heritage tax credits in which they are sold on the open market.
How do we recognize local residents as stakeholders?
Better education and partnership opportunities need to be formed between the developer
and municipalities and shared with residents. Each group needs to trust each other in
delivering high-quality urban spaces. Heritage planning is starting to become more dominant
in the industry, and students are interested in it as a field.
Developers need to meet with the community, and local councillors can act as a mediator in
these discussions with local neighbourhoods.

14
Developers feel that there
should be better incentives
within heritage districts to
promote sustainable
development and conserve
existing structures.

15
Some communities are characterized by smaller
structures that are not conducive to high-density
redevelopment? How do municipalities use and
conserve these vernacular style structures?
It is important to preserve smaller buildings, and retain the character of neighbourhoods.
Planners currently do a good job of managing intensification and changes to an area, but
there is a struggle to create effective and clear processes to manage change.
Older single-family residential structures can work with high-density projects, but developers
have to be smart about form and design. Urban design guidelines need to be followed, views
need to be protected and shading reviewed, and it needs to be recognized that sometimes
the required density forces higher densities. The fear of density can be turned into a
productive tool to retain and rehabilitate older structures. The inflation of property values
makes the economics work.
Heritage development grants can often alleviate the constraints of these projects. The largest
impediment is the capital gains tax that forces current owners to retain large properties, not
allowing developers to purchase properties to renovate or reuse. Developers feel that there
should be better incentives within heritage districts to promote sustainable development and
conserve existing structures. They also suggest that development charges should be tied to
the efficient use of resources, and that heritage reuse projects should be treated differently
than other development projects.
Heritage advocates should provide more support for developers by promoting tax incentives
and placing pressure on local governments to help in conserving buildings. In addition,
smaller buildings provide the life of a city and differentiate communities from one another. It
is important that agencies work together to deliver excellent projects.

16
What are the future developments in heritage in the
Region of Waterloo given the variety of conditions
coming into effect?
Light rail transit, all-day two-way GO Transit, high speed rail and a confluence of successful
redevelopment projects provide ideal market conditions. However, for conservation to
become attractive there needs to be incentives, such as development charges exemptions. In
addition, developers are not looking for relaxed building codes or exemptions from
regulations; they just want a coordinated answer from all regulatory bodies to address the
problems they are facing. The decision-making process needs to be made more efficient to
reduce delays for projects and the tax disincentives on heritage conservation and
preservation need to be removed. The current property tax model encourages developers to
knock down underused buildings and build parking lots for the benefit of reduced taxes.
Taxes tend to reward owners that do not maintain their properties, while owners that invest
and improve get punished with higher taxes as their property value increases. Therefore,
many heritage structures are locked up in a low tax cycle to avoid the inefficiencies in the
current system.
Tax-increment grants are what developers are seeking. There should be a focus on agencies
working together and forming partnerships, potentially having a P4 (public-private-
professional-partnership) on specific sites. Taxes owed on structures are a huge deterrent to
developers, and the provincial setup causes those structures to sit empty.
A lot of good things are happening, but the goal of heritage retention is defeated if buildings
remain empty or poorly maintained. The tax structure needs to be changed, and it’s not just a
local issue, it is a national issue embedded in the tax structure.

17
How do we build new structures that are worth
keeping in the future? What can we do to encourage
good design?
It is important to have good-quality designers and developers that are less focused on profit
and more on building great developments. The job of developers is to force each other to
build excellent structures, but also have the public and advocates voice their opinions and
point to those that have done a poor job, or recognize those that do good work.
Great cities around the world have developed over centuries, and have retained the best
examples from generations of architecture styles. More diversity is needed in the
development industry to bring fresh ideas and new perspectives.
How do we avoid displacement in heritage areas?
Rental replacement programs are an excellent tool in ensuring people can still have access in
perpetuity to redeveloped areas. We must have a mix of unit types and rental/owner
properties, and should avoid just building cheap rental structures.
Heritage conservation is more than providing a token example of a particular period of
architecture. It is about finding the balance between retaining examples of buildings and
community character for future generations, while allowing for intensification and
responsible new development to provide a mix of unit and income types. Communities can
change over centuries, and proper heritage conservation can provide for character and form
a component of a complete community.

18
Panelist Shawky Fahel (President of JG Group of Companies)
presents Dr. Robert Shipley with a plaque recognizing his
years of involvement and dedication to heritage conservation

19
References
1. Shipley, Robert et al. The Lazarus Effect: an exploration of the economics of heritage development in On-
tario. Toronto: Architectural Conservancy of Ontario: Heritage Resources Centre, 2006. uwaterloo.ca/
heritage-resources-centre/sites/ca.heritage-resources-centre/files/uploads/files/lazarus-jan20-
verA_0.pdf
2. Architectural Conservancy of Ontario. Heritage Districts Work! Heritage Conservation District Study Sum-
mary Report. Heritage Resource Centre, 2009 uwaterloo.ca/heritage-resources-centre/sites/ca.heritage
-resources-centre/files/uploads/files/HCDStudySUMMARYREPORT.pdf
3. Heritage Resources Centre and Kayla Jonas Galvin. Heritage Districts Work—More Stories of Success.
Heritage Conservation District Study Phase 2 Summary Report. Waterloo: Heritage Resources Centre,
2012.
Acknowledgements
The KWAR would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their expertise and guidance in preparation
for this event:
Lindsay Benjamin, Region of Waterloo
Leon Bensason, City of Kitchener
Kae Elgie, ACO North Waterloo
These proceedings have been transcribed by Alexander Wray.

20
Photo Credits
“Public Utilities Commission Building at Kitchener, Ontario”
Cover photo, taken by Dmitry Pyryeskin, the photo was cropped from the original format
(commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Public_Utilities_Commission_Building_at_Kitchener,_Ontario.jpg)
“Old Post Office Galt Cambridge Ontario”
Page 3, taken by Balcer, the photo was cropped from the original format
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Old_Post_Office_Galt_Cambridge_Ontario.jpg)
“Tannery Building Kitchener Ontario 1”
Page 7, taken by JustSomePics, the phot was cropped from the original format
(commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tannery_building_Kitchener_Ontario_1.jpg)
“Coffee Culture, and other storefronts, in Kitchener’s lovely old Walper Hotel”
Page 10, taken by Kevin Hansen, the photo was cropped from the original format
(https://www.flickr.com/photos/76342544@N00/4391541913)
“Southside on Lamar”
Page 10, taken by Dave Hensley, the photo was not altered
(flickr.com/photos/davehensley/4414022406)
“Tannery Building Kitchener Ontario 2014”
Page 15, taken by JustSomePics, the photo was cropped from the original format
(commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tannery_building_Kitchener_Ontario_2014.jpg)
“Galt Public Library Cambridge Ontario 2012”
Page 17, taken by JustSomePics, the photo was cropped from the original format
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Galt_Public_Library_Cambridge_Ontario_2012.jpg)

Heritage Proceedings Distribution PDF

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Similar to Heritage Proceedings Distribution PDF

Heritage Proceedings Distribution PDF