Ias and ifrs

International Financial
Reporting Standards
Presentation and disclosure
checklist 2010

Contacts
Deloitte’s www.iasplus.com website provides comprehensive information about international financial reporting in general and IASB activities in
particular. Unique features include:
• daily news about financial reporting globally.
• summaries of all Standards, Interpretations and proposals.
• many IFRS-related publications available for download.
• model IFRS financial statements and checklists.
• an electronic library of several hundred IFRS resources.
• all Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu comment letters to the IASB.
• links to several hundred international accounting websites.
• e-learning modules for each IAS and IFRS – at no charge.
• information about adoptions of IFRSs around the world.
• updates on developments in national accounting standards.
IFRS global office
Global Managing Director, IFRS Clients and Markets
Joel Osnoss
ifrsglobalofficeuk@deloitte.co.uk
Global Managing Director, IFRS Technical
Veronica Poole
Global IFRS Communications
Randall Sogoloff
IFRS centres of excellence
Americas
Canada Robert Lefrancois iasplus@deloitte.ca
LATCO Fermin del Valle iasplus-LATCO@deloitte.com
United States Robert Uhl iasplusamericas@deloitte.com
Asia-Pacific
Australia Bruce Porter iasplus@deloitte.com.au
China Stephen Taylor iasplus@deloitte.com.hk
Japan Shinya Iwasaki iasplus-tokyo@tohmatsu.co.jp
Singapore Shariq Barmaky iasplus-sg@deloitte.com
Europe-Africa
Belgium Laurent Boxus BEIFRSBelgium@deloitte.com
Denmark Jan Peter Larsen dk_iasplus@deloitte.dk
France Laurence Rivat iasplus@deloitte.fr
Germany Andreas Barckow iasplus@deloitte.de
Luxembourg Eddy Termaten luiasplus@deloitte.lu
Netherlands Ralph ter Hoeven iasplus@deloitte.nl
Russia Michael Raikhman iasplus@deloitte.ru
South Africa Graeme Berry iasplus@deloitte.co.za
Spain Cleber Custodio iasplus@deloitte.es
United Kingdom Elizabeth Chrispin iasplus@deloitte.co.uk

International Financial Reporting Standards
Presentation and disclosure checklist 2010
This checklist is intended to aid the user in determining if the presentation and disclosure requirements of International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRSs) have been met. It does not address the requirements of IFRSs as regards recognition and measurement.
The checklist covers the presentation and disclosure requirements of Standards and Interpretations in issue at 30 September 2010 (see contents
pages for listing). Note that:
• this checklist is suitable for use in assessing presentation and disclosure in financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRSs for periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2010. It is not generally appropriate for use for earlier accounting periods (please refer to
www.iasplus.com for earlier versions of this checklist);
• not all IFRSs include presentation or disclosure requirements. Therefore, the listing on the contents pages is not a complete listing of Standards
and Interpretations in issue at 30 September 2010;
• certain Standards and Interpretations in issue at 30 September 2010 are not effective for periods beginning on 1 January 2010. These are
indicated in the checklist by grey shaded text. Earlier application of these requirements is generally permitted (refer to specific Standards/
Interpretations). When those Standards and Interpretations are applied for periods beginning before their effective dates, that fact is generally
required to be disclosed (refer to specific Standards/Interpretations for details); and
• as part of their ongoing work programmes, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the IFRS Interpretations Committee
(formerly known as the ‘IFRIC’) continue to issue Standards and Interpretations. When those Standards and Interpretations are released prior to
the issue of the entity’s financial statements, and they have not been adopted because they are not yet effective, IAS 8 Accounting Policies,
Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors requires entities to disclose that fact and, if estimable, the expected impact in the period of initial
application (see detailed requirements in the IAS 8 section of this checklist).

Abbreviations
AG Application guidance issued as an integral part of IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and IAS 39 Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement
CGU(s) Cash-generating unit(s)
EPS Earnings per Share
IAS(s) International Accounting Standard(s)
IASB International Accounting Standards Board
IE Illustrative Examples accompanying IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation
IFRIC The former International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee of the IASB, now renamed the IFRS Interpretations Committee
(also refers to individual interpretations issued by that Committee)
IFRS(s) International Financial Reporting Standard(s)
SIC Standing Interpretations Committee of the IASB’s predecessor body, the International Accounting Standards Committee, and title of
Interpretations issued by that committee
Throughout this checklist, references are made by IFRS number followed by the paragraph number, (e.g. IAS 18.35 refers to paragraph 35 of
IAS 18). When the checklist covers the requirements of two versions of a recently-revised Standard, the year of revision is noted to distinguish the
requirements. For example, IAS 24.17 refers to paragraph 17 of the 2003 release of IAS 24, whereas IAS 24(2009).18 refers to paragraph 18 of
IAS 24 as revised in 2009.

Contents
Standards
IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards 1
IFRS 2 Share-based Payment 6
IFRS 3 Business Combinations 9
IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts 14
IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations 17
IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources 21
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures (entity has not yet adopted IFRS 9) 22
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures (entity has adopted IFRS 9) 36
IFRS 8 Operating Segments 52
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments 59
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements 60
IAS 2 Inventories 78
IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows 80
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors 85
IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period 88
IAS 11 Construction Contracts 90
IAS 12 Income Taxes 92
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment 96
IAS 17 Leases 98
IAS 18 Revenue 101
IAS 19 Employee Benefits 102
IAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance 107
IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates 109
IAS 23 Borrowing Costs 111
IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures 112
IAS 24(2009) Related Party Disclosures 116
IAS 26 Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans 121
IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements 125
IAS 28 Investments in Associates 127
IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies 129
IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures 130
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation 132
IAS 33 Earnings Per Share 139
IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting 142

Standards
IAS 36 Impairment of Assets 149
IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets 153
IAS 38 Intangible Assets 155
IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement 158
IAS 40 Investment Property 160
IAS 41 Agriculture 163
Interpretations
IFRIC 1 Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities 166
IFRIC 2 Members’ Shares in Co-operative Entities and Similar Instruments 167
IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease 168
IFRIC 5 Rights to Interests arising from Decommissioning, Restoration and Environmental Rehabilitation Funds 169
IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes 170
IFRIC 14 IAS 19 – The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction 171
IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate 172
IFRIC 17 Distributions of Non-Cash Assets to Owners 173
IFRIC 19 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments 174
SIC-27 Evaluating the Substance of Transactions Involving the Legal Form of a Lease 175
SIC-29 Service Concession Arrangements: Disclosures 176

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRS 1, as revised in November
2008, which applies when an entity adopts IFRSs for the first time by an explicit and unreserved statement of
compliance with IFRSs.
New or amended presentation/disclosure requirements effective for the first time
In November 2008, IFRS 1 was substantially rewritten (without altering the technical content) with the objective of
making the Standard clearer and easier to follow. This section of the checklist sets out the requirements of the revised
Standard, which is effective for entities preparing their first IFRS financial statements for a period beginning on or after
1 July 2009.
The following new or amended paragraphs of IFRS 1 are effective for the first time for the period covered by this
checklist:
• new paragraphs 31A and 39A (added by Additional Exemptions for First-time Adopters (Amendments to IFRS 1),
issued in July 2009 and effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2010).
New or amended paragraphs not yet effective
At 30 September 2010, the following new or revised Standards (issued but not yet effective) add new paragraphs to
IFRS 1 or amend existing paragraphs in IFRS 1:
• IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (issued November 2009) makes a number of consequential amendments to IFRS 1.
IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, with earlier application permitted.
The consequential amendments to IFRS 1 should be applied when the entity applies IFRS 9; and
• Improvements to IFRSs (issued May 2010) makes amendments to IFRS 1. The amendments are effective for annual
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011, with earlier application permitted.
Opening IFRS statement of financial position
IFRS 1:6 An entity shall prepare and present an opening IFRS statement of financial position at the date of transition to IFRSs.
Employee benefits
IFRS 1:D11 An entity may disclose the amounts required by paragraph 120A(p) of IAS 19 Employee Benefits as the amounts are
determined for each accounting period prospectively from the date of transition to IFRSs.
Note: Paragraph 120A(p) of IAS 19 requires disclosure of a five year history of defined benefit obligations and plan
assets, and of experience adjustments (see IAS 19 section of this checklist for details). The exemption in IFRS 1:D11
(see above) allows first-time adopters to disclose these amounts only from the transition date to IFRSs.
Share-based payment transactions
IFRS 1:D2 For all grants of equity instruments to which IFRS 2 has not been applied (e.g. equity instruments granted on or before
7 November 2002 – see below), the first-time adopter shall nevertheless disclose the information required by paragraphs 44
and 45 of IFRS 2.
IFRS 1:D2 Notes: First-time adopters are encouraged, but not required, to apply IFRS 2 to equity instruments that were granted
on or before 7 November 2002. First-time adopters are also encouraged, but not required, to apply IFRS 2 to
equity instruments that were granted after 7 November 2002 that vested before the later of (a) the date of
transition to IFRSs and (b) 1 January 2005. However, if a first-time adopter elects to apply IFRS 2 to such equity
instruments, it may do so only if the entity has disclosed publicly the fair value of those equity instruments
determined at the measurement date, as defined in IFRS 2.
See IFRS 2 section of this checklist for the disclosures required by paragraphs 44 and 45 of IFRS 2.
IFRS 1:D3 For liabilities to which IFRS 2 is applied, a first-time adopter is not required to restate comparative information to the
extent that the information relates to a period or date that is earlier than 7 November 2002.
IFRS 1:D3 Note: A first-time adopter is encouraged, but not required, to apply IFRS 2 to liabilities arising from share-based
payment transactions that were settled before the date of transition to IFRSs. A first-time adopter is also
encouraged, but not required, to apply IFRS 2 to liabilities that were settled before 1 January 2005.
IFRS presentation and disclosure checklist 2010
IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards
Reference Presentation/disclosure requirement
1

Insurance contracts
IFRS 1:D4 Note: A first-time adopter may apply the transitional provisions of IFRS 4 (paragraphs 42 to 44 of IFRS 4).
IFRS 4:44 In applying paragraph 39(c)(iii) of IFRS 4 (see relevant section of this checklist), a first-time adopter need not disclose
information about claims development that occurred earlier than five years before the end of the first financial year in
which it applies IFRS 4.
IFRS 4:44 In applying paragraph 39(c)(iii) of IFRS 4 (see relevant section of this checklist), if it is impracticable for the first-time
adopter to prepare information about claims development that occurred before the beginning of the earliest period for
which the entity presents full comparative information that complies with IFRS 4, the entity shall disclose that fact.
Comparative information
IFRS 1:21 The entity’s first IFRS financial statements shall include at least three statements of financial position, two statements of
comprehensive income, two separate income statements (if presented), two statements of cash flows and two
statements of changes in equity and related notes, including comparative information.
Non-IFRS comparative information and historical summaries
Where the entity presents either (i) historical summaries of selected data that do not comply with the recognition or
measurement requirements of IFRSs for periods before the first period for which it presents full comparative information
under IFRSs, or (ii) comparative information under previous GAAP in addition to the comparative information required by
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements:
IFRS 1:22(a) a) the previous GAAP information shall be prominently labelled as not being prepared in accordance with IFRSs; and
IFRS 1:22(b) b) the entity shall disclose the nature of the main adjustments that would make the previous GAAP information comply
with IFRSs.
Notes:
IFRS 1:22 1) Where the entity presents historical summaries of selected data for periods before the first period for which it
presents full comparative information under IFRSs, IFRS 1 does not require such summaries to comply with the
recognition and measurement requirements of IFRSs.
IFRS 1:22(b) 2) When disclosing the nature of the adjustments that would make the information comply with IFRSs, the entity need
not quantify those adjustments.
Explanation of transition to IFRSs
Reconciliations
IFRS 1:23 The entity shall explain how the transition from previous GAAP to IFRSs affected its reported financial position, financial
performance and cash flows.
Note: Paragraphs 24 to 33 of IFRS 1, set out below, specify the detailed disclosures required to comply with IFRS 1:23.
Example 11 included in the Implementation Guidance accompanying IFRS 1 illustrates one way of satisfying the
requirements of paragraphs 24(a) and 24(b) and 25.
IFRS 1:24(a) The entity’s first IFRS financial statements shall include reconciliations of its equity reported under previous GAAP to its
equity under IFRSs for both of the following dates:
a) the date of transition to IFRSs; and
b) the end of the latest period presented in the entity’s most recent annual financial statements in accordance with
previous GAAP.
IFRS 1:24(b) The entity’s first IFRS financial statements shall include reconciliation to its total comprehensive income under IFRSs for
the latest period in the entity’s most recent annual financial statements. The starting point for that reconciliation shall be
total comprehensive income under previous GAAP for the same period or, if an entity did not report such a total, profit
or loss under previous GAAP.
2

IFRS 1:25 Note: The reconciliations required by paragraphs 24(a) and 24(b) of IFRS 1 (as outlined above) are required to give
sufficient detail to enable users to understand the material adjustments to the statement of financial position
and statement of comprehensive income.
IFRS 1:24(c) If the entity recognised or reversed any impairment losses for the first time in preparing its opening IFRS statement of
financial position, its first IFRS financial statements shall include the disclosures that IAS 36 Impairment of Assets would
have required if the entity had recognised those impairment losses or reversals in the period beginning with the date of
transition to IFRSs.
IFRS 1:25 If the entity presented a statement of cash flows under its previous GAAP, it shall explain the material adjustments to the
statement of cash flows.
IFRS 1:26 If the entity has become aware of errors made under previous GAAP, the reconciliations required by paragraphs 24(a)
and 24(b) of IFRS 1 (as outlined above) shall distinguish the correction of those errors from changes in accounting
policies.
IFRS 1:27 Note: IAS 8 does not deal with changes in accounting policies when an entity first adopts IFRSs. Therefore, IAS 8’s
requirements for disclosures about changes in accounting policies do not apply in an entity’s first IFRS financial
statements.
IFRS 1:27 Note: IAS 8 does not apply to the changes in accounting policies an entity makes when it adopts IFRSs or to changes
in those policies until after it presents its first IFRS financial statements. Therefore, IAS 8’s requirements about
changes in accounting policies do not apply in an entity’s first IFRS financial statements.
IFRS 1:27A If during the period covered by its first IFRS financial statements an entity changes its accounting policies or its use of the
exemptions contained in IFRS 1, it shall explain the changes between its first IFRS interim financial report and its first IFRS
financial statements, in accordance with paragraph 23 of IFRS 1, and it shall update the reconciliations required by
paragraph 24(a) and (b) of IFRS 1.
Note: Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010 amended paragraph 27 and added paragraph 27A.
These amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011, with earlier
application permitted.
IFRS 1:28 If the entity did not present financial statements for previous periods, its first IFRS financial statements shall disclose that
fact.
Designation of financial assets or financial liabilities
IFRS 1:29 If the entity has designated any previously recognised financial assets or financial liabilities as ‘at fair value through profit
or loss’ or as ‘available-for-sale’ (as permitted by paragraph D19 of IFRS 1), the following shall be disclosed:
a) the fair value of any financial assets or financial liabilities designated into each category at the date of designation;
and
b) the classification and carrying amount in the previous financial statements.
IFRS 1:29 If the entity has designated any previously recognised financial asset as a financial asset measured at fair value through
profit or loss (as permitted by paragraph D19A of IFRS 1), the following shall be disclosed:
a) the fair value of financial assets so designated at the date of designation; and
IFRS 1:29A If the entity has designated any previously recognised financial liability as a financial liability at fair value through profit or
loss (as permitted by paragraph D19 of IFRS 1), the following shall be disclosed:
a) the fair value of financial liabilities so designated at the date of designation; and
Note: IFRS 9 Financial Instruments amended paragraph 29 and added paragraph 29A. These amendments should be
applied when the entity applies IFRS 9.
IFRS presentation and disclosure checklist 2010 3

Use of fair value as deemed cost
If the entity has used fair value in its opening IFRS statement of financial position as deemed cost for an item of property,
plant and equipment, an investment property or an intangible asset (as permitted by paragraphs D5 and D7 of IFRS 1),
the entity’s first IFRS financial statements shall disclose, for each line item in the opening IFRS statement of financial
position:
IFRS 1:30(a) a) the aggregate of those fair values; and
IFRS 1:30(b) b) the aggregate adjustment to the carrying amounts reported under previous GAAP.
Use of deemed cost for investments in subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates
If an entity uses a deemed cost in its opening IFRS statement of financial position for an investment in a subsidiary,
jointly controlled entity or associate in its separate financial statements (see paragraph D15 of IFRS 1), the entity’s first
IFRS separate financial statements shall disclose:
IFRS 1:31(a) a) the aggregate deemed cost of those investments for which deemed cost is their previous GAAP carrying amount;
IFRS 1:31(b) b) the aggregate deemed cost of those investments for which deemed cost is fair value; and
IFRS 1:31(c) c) the aggregate adjustment to the carrying amounts reported under previous GAAP.
IFRS 1:31A If an entity uses the exemption in paragraph D8A(b) for oil and gas assets, it shall disclose that fact and the basis on
which carrying amounts determined under previous GAAP were allocated.
IFRS 1:31B If an entity uses the exemption in paragraph D8B for operations subject to rate regulation, it shall disclose that fact and
the basis on which carrying amounts were determined under previous GAAP.
Note: Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010 added paragraph 31B. These amendments are effective for annual
Interim financial reports
IFRS 1:32 Note: The requirements below refer to interim reports prepared under IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting for interim
periods covered by the entity’s first IFRS financial statements. They supplement the requirements of IAS 34
(which are set out in a separate section of this checklist) for such interim periods.
IFRS 1:32(a) Where an entity presents an interim financial report under IAS 34 for part of the period covered by its first IFRS financial
statements, and it presented an interim financial report for the comparable interim period of the immediately preceding
financial year, each such interim financial report shall include reconciliations of:
i) its equity under previous GAAP at the end of that comparable interim period to its equity under IFRSs at that date;
and
ii) its total comprehensive income under IFRSs for that comparable interim period (current and year-to-date).
The starting point for that reconciliation shall be total comprehensive income in accordance with previous GAAP for
that period or, if an entity did not report such a total, profit or loss under previous GAAP.
IFRS 1:32(b) In addition to the reconciliations required by paragraph 32(a) of IFRS 1 (as outlined above), the entity’s first interim
financial report in accordance with IAS 34 for part of the period covered by its first IFRS financial statements shall include
the reconciliations described in paragraphs 24(a) and (b) of IFRS 1 (supplemented by the details required by paragraphs
25 and 26 of IFRS 1) (see section headed ‘reconciliations’ above) or a cross-reference to another published document
that includes those reconciliations.
IFRS 1:32(c) If an entity changes its accounting policies or its use of the exemptions contained in IFRS 1, it shall explain the changes
in each such interim financial report in accordance with paragraph 23 of IFRS 1 and update the reconciliations required
by IFRS 1:32(a) and IFRS 1:32(b) above.
Note: Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010 added paragraph 32(c). These amendments are effective for annual
4

IFRS 1:33 If a first-time adopter did not, in its most recent annual financial statements under previous GAAP, disclose information
material to an understanding of the current interim period, its interim financial report shall disclose that information or
include a cross-reference to another published document that includes it.
IFRS 1:33 Note: IAS 34 requires minimum disclosures, which are based on the assumption that users of the interim financial
report also have access to the most recent annual financial statements. However, IAS 34 also requires an entity
to disclose ‘any events or transactions that are material to an understanding of the current interim period’.
Exemption from the requirement to restate comparative information for IFRS 9
IFRS 1:E2 An entity that chooses to present comparative information that does not comply with IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 in its first year of
transition shall:
a) apply the recognition and measurement requirements of its previous GAAP in place of the requirements of IAS 39
and IFRS 9 to comparative information about assets within the scope of IFRS 9;
b) disclose this fact together with the basis used to prepare this information;
c) treat any adjustment between the statement of financial position at the comparative period’s reporting date (i.e. the
statement of financial position that includes comparative information under previous GAAP) and the statement of
financial position at the start of the first IFRS reporting period (i.e. the first period that includes information that
complies with IFRS 9 and IFRS 7) as arising from a change in accounting policy and give the disclosures required by
paragraph 28(a)-(e) and (f)(i) of IAS 8. Paragraph 28 (f)(i) applies only to amounts presented in the statement of
financial position at the comparative period’s reporting date; and
d) apply paragraph 17(c) of IAS 1 to provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in
IFRSs is insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions
on the entity’s financial position and financial performance.
IFRS 1:E1 Note: In its first IFRS financial statements, an entity that (a) adopts IFRSs for annual periods beginning before
1 January 2012 and (b) applies IFRS 9 is required to present at least one year of comparative information.
However, this comparative information need not comply with IFRS 9 or IFRS 7 to the extent that the disclosures
required by IFRS 7 relate to assets within the scope of IFRS 9. For such entities, references to the ‘date of
transition to IFRSs’ should be taken to mean, in the case of IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 only, the beginning of the first IFRS
reporting period.
Disclosures about financial instruments
IFRS 1:E3 Note: Improving Disclosures about Financial Instruments (Amendments to IFRS 7), issued in March 2009, introduces
enhanced disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements and liquidity risk. These amendments are
effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. A first-time adopter may apply the
transitional provisions of IFRS 7:44G (see below) for these disclosures.
IFRS 7:44G An entity need not provide the disclosures required by the amendments arising from Improving Disclosures about
Financial Instruments (Amendments to IFRS 7) for:
a) any annual or interim period, including any statement of financial position, presented within an annual comparative
period ending before 31 December 2009; or
b) any statement of financial position as at the beginning of the earliest comparative period as at a date before
31 December 2009.
Adoption of amendments to Standard in advance of effective date
IFRS 1:39C If the entity has applied paragraph E3 of IFRS 1 arising from Limited Exemption from Comparative IFRS 7 Disclosures for
First-time Adopters (Amendments to IFRS 1), issued in January 2010, for a period beginning before 1 July 2010, it shall
disclose that fact.
IFRS 1:39E If the entity has applied the amendments to IFRS 1 arising from Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010 for a period
beginning before 1 January 2011, it shall disclose that fact.
IFRS 1:39E If the entity adopted IFRSs in a period beginning before the effective date of IFRS 1 or applied IFRS 1 in a previous
period, and applies the amendment to paragraph D8 arising from Improvements to IFRSs retrospectively in the first
annual period after the amendment is effective, it shall disclose that fact.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRS 2, which prescribes the
accounting for transactions in which the consideration paid by the entity for goods or services is linked, either directly
or indirectly, to the entity’s equity securities or to equity instruments of another entity in the same group. The principal
issues relate to the measurement of the share-based payment transaction and the subsequent expensing thereof.
The Implementation Guidance accompanying IFRS 2 provides an illustration of one way of satisfying the disclosure
requirements of paragraphs 44 to 52 of IFRS 2. Note that the illustrative example is not exhaustive and, in particular, it
does not illustrate the disclosure requirements in paragraphs 47(c), 48 and 49 of IFRS 2.
None
None
The nature and extent of share-based payment arrangements that existed in the period
IFRS 2:44 The entity shall disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand the nature and extent
of share-based payment arrangements that existed during the period.
Note: Paragraph 45 of IFRS 2, set out below, specifies the minimum disclosures required to satisfy this requirement.
The entity shall disclose the following (at a minimum):
IFRS 2:45(a) a) a description of each type of share-based payment arrangement that existed at any time during the period, including
the general terms and conditions of each arrangement;
Notes:
IFRS 2:45(a) 1) The general terms and conditions of share-based payment arrangements will include items such as vesting
requirements, the maximum term of the options granted, and the method of settlement (cash or equity or both).
IFRS 2:45(a) 2) An entity with substantially similar types of share-based payment arrangements may aggregate this information,
unless separate disclosure of each arrangement is necessary to satisfy the principle in paragraph 44 of IFRS 2
(see above).
IFRS 2:45(b) b) the number and weighted average exercise prices of share options for each of the following groups of options:
i) outstanding at the beginning of the period;
ii) granted during the period;
iii) forfeited during the period;
iv) exercised during the period;
v) expired during the period;
vi) outstanding at the end of the period; and
vii) exercisable at the end of the period;
IFRS 2:45(c) c) for share options exercised during the period, the weighted average share price at the date of exercise; and
IFRS 2:45(c) Note: If options were exercised on a regular basis throughout the period, the entity may instead disclose the
weighted average share price during the period.
IFRS 2:45(d) d) for share options outstanding at the end of the period, the range of exercise prices and weighted average remaining
contractual life.
IFRS 2 Share-based Payment
6

IFRS 2:45(d) Note: If the range of exercise prices is wide, the outstanding options shall be divided into ranges that are meaningful
for assessing the number and timing of additional shares that may be issued and the cash that may be received
upon exercise of those options.
The basis for determination of the fair value of the goods or services received, or the fair value of the equity
instruments granted, during the period
IFRS 2:46 The entity shall disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand how the fair value of
the goods or services received, or the fair value of the equity instruments granted, during the period was determined.
Note: Paragraphs 47 to 49 of IFRS 2, set out below, specify the minimum disclosures required to satisfy this
requirement.
IFRS 2:47(a) If the entity has measured the fair value of goods or services received as consideration for equity instruments of the
entity indirectly, by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments granted, the entity shall disclose the following for
share options granted during the period (at a minimum):
a) the weighted average fair value of those share options at the measurement date; and
b) information on how the fair value of the share options was measured, including:
i) the option pricing model used;
ii) the inputs to that model, including the weighted average share price, the exercise price, expected volatility,
option life, expected dividends, the risk-free interest rate and any other inputs to the model, including the
method used and the assumptions made to incorporate the effects of expected early exercise;
iii) how the expected volatility was determined, including an explanation of the extent to which expected volatility
was based on historical volatility; and
iv) whether and how any other features of the option grant were incorporated into the measurement of fair value,
such as a market condition.
IFRS 2:47(b) If the entity has measured the fair value of goods or services received as consideration for equity instruments of the
equity instruments other than share options granted during the period (at a minimum):
a) the number and weighted average fair value of those equity instruments, determined at the measurement date; and
b) information on how the fair value of the equity instruments was measured, including:
i) if fair value was not measured on the basis of an observable market price, how it was determined;
ii) whether and how expected dividends were incorporated into the measurement of fair value; and
iii) whether and how any other features of the equity instruments granted were incorporated into the
measurement of fair value.
IFRS 2:47(c) If the entity has measured the fair value of goods or services received as consideration for equity instruments of the
share-based payment arrangements that were modified during the period (at a minimum):
a) an explanation of those modifications;
b) the incremental fair value granted (as a result of those modifications); and
c) information on how the incremental fair value granted was measured, consistently with the requirements set out in
paragraphs 47(a) and 47(b) of IFRS 2 (see above), where applicable.
IFRS 2:48 If the entity has measured directly the fair value of goods or services received during the period, the entity shall disclose
how that fair value was determined (e.g. whether fair value was measured at a market price for those goods and services).
IFRS 2:49 If the entity has rebutted the presumption in paragraph 13 of IFRS 2 that the fair value of the goods or services received
from parties other than employees can be measured reliably (and, consequently, the entity has measured the fair value of
goods and services received from such parties by reference to the equity instruments granted), the entity shall disclose:
a) that fact; and
b) an explanation of why the presumption was rebutted.

The effect of share-based payment transactions on the entity’s profit or loss for the period and on its
financial position
IFRS 2:50 The entity shall disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand the effect of share-based
payment transactions on the entity’s profit or loss for the period and on its financial position.
The entity shall disclose the following (at a minimum):
IFRS 2:51(a) a) the total expense recognised for the period arising from share-based payment transactions in which the goods or
services received did not qualify for recognition as assets (and hence were recognised as an expense);
IFRS 2:51(a) b) the portion of the total expense recognised for the period that arises from transactions accounted for as equity-settled
share-based payment transactions;
IFRS 2:51(b) c) the total carrying amount at the end of the period for liabilities arising from share-based payment transactions; and
IFRS 2:51(b) d) the total intrinsic value at the end of the period of liabilities arising from share-based payment transactions for which
the counterparty’s right to cash or other assets had vested by the end of the period (e.g. vested share appreciation
rights).
Additional information
IFRS 2:52 If the detailed information specified for disclosure by IFRS 2 (as set out above) does not satisfy the principles in
paragraphs 44, 46 and 50 of IFRS 2, the entity shall disclose such additional information as is necessary to satisfy those
principles.
Transitional provisions
IFRS 2:56 For all grants of equity instruments to which IFRS 2 has not been applied (e.g. equity instruments granted on or before
7 November 2002), the entity shall nevertheless disclose the information required by paragraphs 44 and 45 of IFRS 2
(see above).
8

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRS 3 as revised in 2008 which
prescribes the accounting treatment for business combinations.
This section of the checklist sets out the requirements of IFRS 3 as revised in 2008, which is effective for business
combinations in reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009.
• Improvements to IFRSs (issued in May 2010) makes amendments to IFRS 3 (although no amendments to disclosure
requirements) which are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2010, with earlier application
permitted.
The nature and financial effect of business combinations that occur during the current period or after the
end of the reporting period
The acquirer shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial
effect of a business combination that occurs either:
IFRS 3:59(a) a) during the current reporting period; or
IFRS 3:59(b) b) after the end of the reporting period but before the financial statements are authorised for issue.
IFRS 3:60 Note: Paragraphs B64 to B66 of IFRS 3, (set out below), specify the minimum disclosures required to satisfy this
requirement.
Business combinations that occur during the reporting period
IFRS 3:B65 Note: The information required by paragraphs B64(e)-(q) of IFRS 3 (see below) shall be disclosed in aggregate for
business combinations occurring during the reporting period that are individually immaterial, but that are
material collectively.
For each business combination that occurs during the reporting period, the acquirer shall disclose:
IFRS 3:B64(a) a) the name and description of the acquiree;
IFRS 3:B64(b) b) the acquisition date;
IFRS 3:B64(c) c) the percentage of voting equity interests acquired;
IFRS 3:B64(d) d) the primary reason for the business combination;
IFRS 3:B64(d) e) a description of how the acquirer obtained control of the acquiree;
IFRS 3:B64(e) f) a qualitative description of the factors that make up the goodwill recognised, such as expected synergies from
combining operations of the acquiree and the acquirer, intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition
or other factors;
IFRS 3:B64(f) g) the acquisition-date fair value of the total consideration transferred;
IFRS 3:B64(f) h) the acquisition-date fair value of each major class of consideration, such as:
i) cash;
ii) other tangible or intangible assets, including a business or subsidiary of the acquirer;
iii) liabilities incurred (e.g. a liability for contingent consideration); and
IFRS 3 Business Combinations
9

iv) equity interests of the acquirer, including the number of instruments or interests issued or issuable and the
method of determining the fair value of those instruments or interests;
IFRS 3:B64(g) i) for contingent consideration arrangements and indemnification assets:
i) the amount recognised as of the acquisition date;
ii) a description of the arrangement and the basis for determining the amount of the payment;
iii) if a range can be estimated, an estimate of the range of outcomes (undiscounted);
iv) if a range cannot be estimated, that fact and the reasons why a range cannot be estimated; and
v) if the maximum amount of the payment is unlimited, that fact;
IFRS 3:40 Note: The acquirer shall classify an obligation to pay contingent consideration as a liability or as equity on the basis
of the definitions of an equity instrument and a financial liability in paragraph 11 of IAS 32, or other applicable
IFRSs. The acquirer shall classify as an asset a right to the return of previously transferred consideration if
specified conditions are met. Paragraph 58 of IFRS 3 provides guidance on the subsequent accounting for
contingent consideration.
IFRS 3:B64(h) j) for acquired receivables:
i) the fair value of the receivables;
ii) the gross contractual amounts receivable; and
iii) the best estimate at the acquisition date of the contractual cash flows not expected to be collected;
IFRS 3:B64(h) Note: The disclosures required by paragraph B64(h) of IFRS 3 (see above) shall be provided by major class of
receivable, such as loans, direct finance leases and any other class of receivables.
IFRS 3:B64(i) k) the amounts recognised as of the acquisition date for each major class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed;
IFRS 3:B64(j) l) for each contingent liability recognised in accordance with paragraph 23 of IFRS 3, the information required by
paragraph 85 of IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (see relevant section of this
checklist);
IFRS 3:B64(j) m) if a contingent liability is not recognised because its fair value cannot be measured reliably:
i) the information required by paragraph 86 of IAS 37 (see relevant section of this checklist); and
ii) the reasons why the liability cannot be measured reliably;
IFRS 3:B64(k) n) the total amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible for tax purposes;
IFRS 3:B64(l) o) for transactions that are recognised separately from the acquisition of assets and assumption of liabilities in the
business combination in accordance with paragraph 51 of IFRS 3:
i) a description of each transaction;
ii) how the acquirer accounted for each transaction;
iii) the amounts recognised for each transaction and the line item in the financial statements in which each amount
is recognised; and
iv) if the transaction is the effective settlement of a pre-existing relationship, the method used to determine the
settlement amount;
IFRS 3:51 Note: The acquirer and the acquiree may have a pre-existing relationship or other arrangement before negotiations
for the business combination began, or they may enter into an arrangement during the negotiations that is
separate from the business combination. In either situation, the acquirer shall identify any amounts that are not
part of what the acquirer and the acquiree (or its former owners) exchanged in the business combination, i.e.
amounts that are not part of the exchange for the acquiree. The acquirer shall recognise as part of applying
the acquisition method only the consideration transferred for the acquiree and the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in the exchange for the acquiree. Separate transactions are accounted for in accordance
with the relevant IFRSs.
10

IFRS 3:B64(m) p) the disclosure of separately recognised transactions required by paragraph B64(l) (see above) shall include:
i) the amount of acquisition-related costs;
ii) the amount of those costs recognised as an expense;
iii) the line item or items in the statement of comprehensive income in which those expenses are recognised; and
iv) the amount of any issue costs not recognised as an expense and how they were recognised;
IFRS 3:B64(n) q) in a bargain purchase (see paragraphs 34–36 of IFRS 3):
i) the amount of any gain recognised in accordance with paragraph 34 of IFRS 3 and the line item in the
statement of comprehensive income in which the gain is recognised; and
ii) a description of the reasons why the transaction resulted in a gain;
IFRS 3:34 Note: A bargain purchase is a business combination in which the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identified
assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, exceeds the aggregate of consideration transferred, the amount of
the non-controlling interest and the acquisition-date fair value of any previously held equity interest in the
acquiree.
IFRS 3:B64(o) r) for each business combination in which the acquirer holds less than 100 per cent of the equity interests in the
acquiree at the acquisition date:
i) the amount of the non-controlling interest in the acquiree recognised at the acquisition date and the
measurement basis for that amount; and
ii) for each non-controlling interest in an acquiree measured at fair value, the valuation techniques and key model
inputs used for determining that value;
IFRS 3:B64(p) s) in a business combination achieved in stages:
i) the acquisition-date fair value of the equity interest in the acquiree held by the acquirer immediately before the
acquisition date; and
ii) the amount of any gain or loss recognised as a result of remeasuring to fair value the equity interest in the
acquiree held by the acquirer before the business combination (see paragraph 42 of IFRS 3) and the line item in
the statement of comprehensive income in which that gain or loss is recognised; and
IFRS 3:B64(q) t) unless impracticable, the following information:
i) the amounts of revenue and profit or loss of the acquiree since the acquisition date included in the consolidated
statement of comprehensive income for the reporting period; and
ii) the revenue and profit or loss of the combined entity for the current reporting period as though the acquisition
date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been as of the beginning of the annual
reporting period;
IFRS 3:B64(q) If disclosure of any of the information required by paragraph B64(q) of IFRS 3 (see above) would be impracticable, the
entity shall disclose:
a) that fact; and
b) an explanation of why the disclosure is impracticable.
IFRS 3:B64(q) Note: IFRS 3 uses the term ‘impracticable’ with the same meaning as in IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors.
Business combinations occurring after the reporting period
IFRS 3:B66 If the acquisition date of a business combination is after the end of the reporting period but before the financial
statements are authorised for issue, the acquirer shall disclose the information required by paragraph B64 of IFRS 3 (see
above), unless the initial accounting for the business combination is incomplete at the time the financial statements are
authorised for issue.

IFRS 3:B66 If the initial accounting for a business combination occurring after the reporting period is incomplete at the time the
financial statements are authorised for issue, the entity shall disclose:
a) a description of which disclosures could not be made; and
b) the reasons why they could not be made.
The effects of adjustments recognised in the current period that relate to business combinations that
occurred in the period or previous reporting periods
IFRS 3:61 The acquirer shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate the financial effect of
adjustments recognised in the current reporting period that relate to business combinations that occurred in the period
or previous reporting periods.
IFRS 3:62 Note: Paragraph B67 of IFRS 3, set out below, specifies the minimum disclosures required to satisfy this requirement.
IFRS 3:B67 To meet the objective in paragraph 61 of IFRS 3 (see above), the acquirer shall disclose the following information for
each material business combination (or in the aggregate for individually immaterial business combinations that are
material collectively):
IFRS 3:B67(a) a) if the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete (see paragraph 45 of IFRS 3) for particular assets,
liabilities, non-controlling interests or items of consideration and the amounts recognised in the financial statements
for the business combination thus have been determined only provisionally:
i) the reasons why the initial accounting for the business combination is incomplete;
ii) the assets, liabilities, equity interests or items of consideration for which the initial accounting is incomplete; and
iii) the nature and amount of any measurement period adjustments recognised during the reporting period in
accordance with paragraph 49 of IFRS 3;
IFRS 3:B67(b) b) for each reporting period after the acquisition date until the entity collects, sells or otherwise loses the right to a
contingent consideration asset, or until the entity settles a contingent consideration liability or the liability is
cancelled or expires:
i) any changes in the recognised amounts, including any differences arising upon settlement;
ii) any changes in the range of outcomes (undiscounted) and the reasons for those changes; and
iii) the valuation techniques and key model inputs used to measure contingent consideration;
IFRS 3:B67(c) c) for contingent liabilities recognised in a business combination, the information required by paragraphs 84 and 85 of
IAS 37 (see relevant section of this checklist) for each class of provision; and
IFRS 3:B67(e) d) the amount and an explanation of any gain or loss recognised in the current reporting period that both:
i) relates to the identifiable assets acquired or liabilities assumed in a business combination that was effected in
the current or previous reporting period; and
ii) is of such a size, nature or incidence that disclosure is relevant to understanding the combined entity’s financial
statements.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill
IFRS 3:B67(d) The entity shall disclose a reconciliation of the carrying amount of goodwill at the beginning and end of the reporting
period, showing separately:
a) the gross amount and accumulated impairment losses at the beginning of the reporting period;
b) additional goodwill recognised during the reporting period, except goodwill included in a disposal group that, on
acquisition, meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for
Sale and Discontinued Operations;
c) adjustments resulting from the subsequent recognition of deferred tax assets during the reporting period in
accordance with paragraph 67 or IFRS 3;
d) goodwill included in a disposal group classified as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5 and goodwill derecognised
during the reporting period without having previously been included in a disposal group classified as held for sale;
e) impairment losses recognised during the reporting period in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets;
12

Note: In addition to this requirement, the entity is required to disclose information about the recoverable amount and
impairment of goodwill in accordance with IAS 36.
f) net exchange rate differences arising during the reporting period in accordance with IAS 21 The Effects of Changes
in Foreign Exchange Rates;
g) any other changes in the carrying amount during the reporting period; and
h) the gross amount and accumulated impairment losses at the end of the reporting period.
Additional information
IFRS 3:63 If the specific disclosures required by IFRS 3 and other IFRSs do not meet the objectives set out in paragraphs 59 and 61
of IFRS 3 (see above), the acquirer shall disclose whatever additional information is necessary to meet those objectives.
Adoption of amendments to Standard in advance of its effective date
IFRS 3.64B & C If the entity has applied the amendments to IFRS 3 arising from Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010 for a period
beginning before 1 July 2010, it shall disclose that fact.
Notes:
IFRS 3.64B 1. Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010 amends paragraphs 19, 30 and B56 and adds paragraphs B62A and
B62B. Those amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2010, with earlier
application permitted. Application should be prospective from the date when the entity first applied this IFRS.
IFRS 3.64C 2. Paragraphs 65A – 65E were added by Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010. Those amendments are effective
for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2010, with earlier application permitted. The amendments should
be applied to contingent consideration balances arising from business combinations with an acquisition date prior
to the application of IFRS 3, as issued in 2008.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRS 4, which specifies the
financial reporting for insurance contracts by an entity that issues such contracts (described as an insurer). IFRS 4 is an
interim measure until the IASB completes the second phase of its project on insurance contracts.
An insurance contract is defined as a contract under which one party (the insurer) accepts significant insurance risk
from another party (the policy holder) by agreeing to compensate the policy holder if a specified uncertain future event
(the insured event) adversely affects the policy holder. Refer to Appendix B of IFRS 4 for an extended discussion of the
definition of an insurance contract, and to paragraphs 2 to 12 of IFRS 4 for the specific rules as regards the scope of
the Standard.
Note that the Implementation Guidance accompanying IFRS 4 clarifies a number of the disclosure requirements, and
contains extensive guidance on possible ways to meet the disclosure requirements in paragraphs 36 to 39A of the
Standard.
None
None
Offsetting
IFRS 4:14(d) An insurer shall not offset:
a) reinsurance assets against the related insurance liabilities; or
b) income or expense from reinsurance contracts against the expense or income from the related insurance contracts.
Insurance contracts acquired in a business combination or portfolio transfer
IFRS 4:31 To comply with IFRS 3, an insurer shall, at the acquisition date, measure at fair value the insurance liabilities assumed and
insurance assets acquired in a business combination. However, an insurer is permitted, but not required, to use an
expanded presentation that splits the fair value of acquired insurance contracts into two components:
a) a liability measured in accordance with the insurer’s accounting policies for insurance contracts that it issues; and
b) an intangible asset, representing the difference between (i) the fair value of the contractual insurance rights acquired
and insurance obligations assumed, and (ii) the amount described in (a) above.
Notes:
IFRS 4:31(b) 1) The subsequent measurement of any intangible asset separately identified in accordance with the alternative
treatment permitted under paragraph 31 of IFRS 4 (see above) shall be consistent with the measurement of the
related insurance liability.
IFRS 4:32 2) An insurer acquiring a portfolio of insurance contracts may also use the expanded presentation permitted by
paragraph 31 of IFRS 4 (see above).
Discretionary participation features in financial instruments
IFRS 4:35(b) Where the entity is the issuer of a financial instrument that contains a discretionary participation feature, in applying the
rules set out in paragraph 34 of IFRS 4, the entity need not disclose the amount that would result from applying IAS 39
to the guaranteed element, nor need it present that amount separately.
IFRS 4:35(d) Where the entity is the issuer of a financial instrument that contains a discretionary participation feature, in applying the
rules set out in paragraph 34 of IFRS 4, although these contracts are financial instruments, an issuer applying paragraph
20(b) of IFRS 7 to contracts with a discretionary participation feature shall disclose the total interest expense recognised
in profit or loss, but need not calculate such interest expense using the effective interest method.
Explanation of recognised amounts
IFRS 4:36 The insurer shall disclose information that identifies and explains the amounts in its financial statements arising from
insurance contracts.
IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts
14

The insurer shall disclose:
IFRS 4:37(a) a) its accounting policies for insurance contracts and related assets, liabilities, income and expense;
IFRS 4:37(b) b) the recognised assets, liabilities, income and expense (and, if it presents its statement of cash flows using the direct
method, cash flows) arising from insurance contracts;
IFRS 4:37(b) c) if the insurer is a cedant (i.e. the policy holder under a reinsurance contract):
i) gains and losses recognised in profit or loss on buying reinsurance; and
ii) if the cedant defers and amortises gains and losses arising on buying reinsurance, the amortisation for the
period and the amounts remaining unamortised at the beginning and end of the period;
IFRS 4:37(c) d) the process used to determine the assumptions that have the greatest effect on the measurement of the recognised
amounts described in accordance with paragraph 37(b) of IFRS 4 (see above);
IFRS 4:37(c) Note: When practicable, an insurer shall also give quantified disclosure of those assumptions.
IFRS 4:37(d) e) the effect of changes in assumptions used to measure insurance assets and insurance liabilities, showing separately
the effect of each change that has a material effect on the financial statements; and
IFRS 4:37(e) f) reconciliations of changes in insurance liabilities, reinsurance assets and, if any, related deferred acquisition costs.
Nature and extent of risks arising from insurance contracts
IFRS 4:38 The insurer shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate the nature and extent of
risks arising from insurance contracts.
The insurer shall disclose:
IFRS 4:39(a) a) its objectives, policies and processes for managing risks arising from insurance contracts;
IFRS 4:39(a) b) the methods used to manage those risks;
IFRS 4:39(c) c) information about insurance risk (both before and after risk mitigation by reinsurance), including information about:
i) sensitivity to insurance risk (see note 1 below);
ii) concentrations of insurance risk, including a description of how management determines concentrations and a
description of the shared characteristic that identifies each concentration (e.g. type of insured event,
geographical area, or currency); and
iii) actual claims compared with previous estimates (i.e. claims development) (see note 2 below);
IFRS 4:39(d) d) information about credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk that paragraphs 31 to 42 of IFRS 7 would require if the
insurance contracts were within the scope of IFRS 7 (see notes 3 and 4 below); and
IFRS 4:39(e) e) information about exposures to market risk arising from embedded derivatives contained in a host insurance
contract if the insurer is not required to, and does not, measure the embedded derivatives at fair value.

IFRS 4:39A Notes:
1) To comply with paragraph 39(c)(i) of IFRS 4 (see above), an insurer shall disclose either (a) or (b) as follows:
a) a sensitivity analysis that shows how profit or loss and equity would have been affected if changes in the
relevant risk variable that were reasonably possible at the end of the reporting period had occurred; the
methods and assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analysis; and any changes from the previous period
in the methods and assumptions used. However, if an insurer uses an alternative method to manage sensitivity
to market conditions, such as an embedded value analysis, it may meet this requirement by disclosing that
alternative sensitivity analysis and the disclosures required by paragraph 41 of IFRS 7 Financial Instruments:
Disclosures; or
b) qualitative information about sensitivity, and information about those terms and conditions of insurance
contracts that have a material effect on the amount, timing and uncertainty of the insurer’s future cash flows.
IFRS 4:39(c)(iii) 2) The disclosure about claims development required under IFRS 4.39(c)(iii) shall go back to the period when the
earliest material claim arose for which there is still uncertainty about the amount and timing of the claims
payments, but need not go back more than ten years. An insurer need not disclose this information for claims for
which uncertainty about the amount and timing of claims payments is typically resolved within one year.
IFRS 4:39(d)(i) 3) An insurer need not provide the maturity analyses required by paragraph 39(a) and (b) of IFRS 7 if it discloses
information about the estimated timing of the net cash outflows resulting from recognised insurance liabilities
instead. This may take the form of an analysis, by estimated timing, of the amounts recognised in the statement of
financial position.
IFRS 4:39(d)(ii) 4) If an insurer uses an alternative method to manage sensitivity to market conditions, such as an embedded value
analysis, it may use that sensitivity analysis to meet the requirements of paragraph 40(a) of IFRS 7. Such an insurer
is also required to provide the disclosures required by paragraph 41 of IFRS 7.
IFRS 4:44 5) In applying paragraph 39(c)(iii) of IFRS 4, an entity need not disclose information about claims development that
occurred earlier than five years before the end of the first financial year in which it applies IFRS 4.
Furthermore, if it is impracticable, when an entity first applies IFRS 4, to prepare information about claims
development that occurred before the beginning of the earliest period for which an entity presents full comparative
information that complies with IFRS 4, the entity shall disclose that fact.
16

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRS 5, which prescribes
reporting of non-current assets (or disposal groups) held for sale and discontinued operations. The principal issues
relate to the accounting treatment for assets held for sale, and the presentation and disclosure of discontinued
operations.
Refer to IFRS 5 for the definition of discontinued operations and the criteria for classification of non-current assets (and
disposal groups) as held for sale.
The following new or amended paragraphs are effective for the first time for the period covered by this checklist:
• new paragraph 33(d) (added as a consequential amendment of IAS 27 (as amended in 2008) Consolidated and
Separate Financial Statements – issued in January 2008 and effective for annual periods beginning on or after
1 July 2009, with limited early application permitted);
• new paragraphs 8A and 36A (added by Improvements to IFRSs – issued in May 2008 and effective for annual
periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009);
• new paragraphs 5A, 12A and 15A (added as a consequential amendment of IFRIC 17 Distributions of Non-cash
Assets to Owners – issued in November 2008 and effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009);
and
• new paragraph 5B (added by Improvements to IFRSs – issued in April 2009 and effective for annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2010).
None
Scope clarifications
Notes:
IFRS 5:5A 1. The classification, presentation and measurement requirements in IFRS 5 applicable to a non-current asset (or
disposal group) that is classified as held for sale apply also to a non-current asset (or disposal group) that is
classified as held for distribution to owners acting in their capacity as owners (held for distribution to owners).
IFRS 5:5B 2. IFRS 5 specifies the disclosures required in respect of non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for
sale or discontinued operations. Disclosures in other IFRSs do not apply to such assets (or disposal groups) unless
those IFRSs require:
a. specific disclosures in respect of non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale or
discontinued operations; or
b. disclosures about measurement of assets and liabilities within a disposal group that are not within the scope of
the measurement requirements of IFRS 5 and such disclosures are not already provided in the other notes to the
financial statements (e.g. financial assets (IAS 39) employee benefit assets (IAS 19), deferred tax assets (IAS 12))
Additional disclosures may be necessary to comply with the general requirements of IAS 1.
IFRS 5.8A 3. An entity that is committed to a sale plan involving loss of control of a subsidiary shall classify all the assets and
liabilities of that subsidiary as held for sale when the criteria set out in paragraphs 6-8 of IFRS 5 are met, regardless
of whether the entity will retain a non-controlling interest in its former subsidiary after the sale.
Presentation of increase in the present value of costs to sell that arises from the passage of time
IFRS 5:17 Any increase in the present value of costs to sell that arises from the passage of time shall be presented in profit or loss
as a financing cost.
Note: A non-current asset (or disposal group) classified as held for sale is measured at the lower of its carrying amount
and fair value less costs to sell. When the sale is expected to occur beyond one year, the entity measures the costs
to sell at their present value. This present value may increase as a result of the passage of time, and paragraph 17
of IFRS 5 (see above) specifies that any such increase should be presented as a financing cost.
17
IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

Assets that cease to be classified as held for sale
IFRS 5:28 Where a non-current asset or disposal group is remeasured in accordance with paragraph 27 of IFRS 5 (when it ceases
to be classified as held for sale on the basis that it no longer meets the criteria in paragraphs 7 to 9 of IFRS 5 for
classification as held for sale):
a) if the asset is property, plant and equipment or an intangible asset that had been revalued in accordance with IAS 16
Property, Plant and Equipment or IAS 38 Intangible Assets before classification as held for sale, the adjustment to
the carrying amount of the asset shall be treated as a revaluation increase or decrease;
b) otherwise, the entity shall:
i) include any required adjustment to the carrying amount of the asset in profit or loss from continuing operations
in the period in which the criteria in paragraphs 7 to 9 of IFRS 5 are no longer met; and
ii) present that adjustment in the same caption in the statement of comprehensive income used to present a gain
or loss, if any, recognised in accordance with paragraph 37 of IFRS 5 (see below).
IFRS 5:42 If either paragraph 26 or paragraph 29 of IFRS 5 applies (reclassification of assets or disposal groups that previously were
classified as held for sale), an entity shall disclose, in the period of the decision to change the plan to sell the non-current
asset (or disposal group), a description of the facts and circumstances leading to the decision and the effect of the
decision on the results of operations for the period and any prior periods presented.
Information regarding the financial effects of discontinued operations and disposals of non-current assets
(or disposal groups)
IFRS 5:30 An entity shall present and disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to evaluate the financial
effects of discontinued operations and disposals of non-current assets (or disposal groups).
Note: Paragraphs 33 to 42 of IFRS 5, set out below, specify the minimum disclosures required to satisfy this
requirement.
Presenting discontinued operations
IFRS 5:33(a) An entity shall disclose a single amount in the statement of comprehensive income comprising the total of:
a) the post-tax profit or loss of discontinued operations, and
b) the post-tax gain or loss recognised on the measurement to fair value less costs to sell or on the disposal of the
assets or disposal group(s) constituting the discontinued operation.
Note: Example 11 in the Implementation Guidance accompanying IFRS 5 illustrates how this disclosure requirement
might be met.
IFRS 5:33(b) An entity shall provide an analysis of the single amount disclosed in accordance with paragraph 33(a) of IFRS 5 (see above)
into the following:
a) the revenue, expenses and pre-tax profit or loss of discontinued operations;
b) the related income tax expense as required by paragraph 81(h) of IAS 12 Income Taxes;
c) the gain or loss recognised on the measurement to fair value less costs to sell or on the disposal of the assets or
disposal group(s) constituting the discontinued operation; and
d) the related income tax expense as required by paragraph 81(h) of IAS 12.
IFRS 5:33(b) Note: The analysis required by paragraph 33(b) of IFRS 5 (see above) may be presented in the notes or in the
statement of comprehensive income. If it is presented in the statement of comprehensive income, it shall be
presented in a section identified as relating to discontinued operations, i.e. separately from continuing
operations. The analysis is not required for disposal groups that are newly acquired subsidiaries that meet the
criteria to be classified as held for sale on acquisition (see paragraph 11 of IFRS 5).
IFRS 5:33(c) An entity shall disclose the net cash flows attributable to the operating, investing and financing activities of discontinued
operations.
18

IFRS 5:33(c) Note: The disclosures required by paragraph 33(c) of IFRS 5 (see above) may be presented either in the notes or in the
financial statements. These disclosures are not required for disposal groups that are newly acquired subsidiaries
that meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale on acquisition (see paragraph 11 of IFRS 5).
IFRS 5:33(d) An entity shall disclose the amount of income from continuing operations and from discontinued operations attributable
to owners of the parent. These disclosures may be presented either in the notes or in the statement of comprehensive
income.
IFRS 5:33A If an entity presents the components of profit or loss in a separate income statement as described in paragraph 81 of
IAS 1, a section identified as relating to discontinued operations is presented in that separate statement.
IFRS 5:34 The entity shall re-present the disclosures in paragraph 33 of IFRS 5 (see above) for prior periods presented in the
financial statements so that the disclosures relate to all operations that have been discontinued by the end of the
reporting period for the latest period presented.
IFRS 5:35 Adjustments in the current period to amounts previously presented in discontinued operations that are directly related to
the disposal of a discontinued operation in a prior period shall be classified separately in discontinued operations.
Notes:
IFRS 5:35 1) The nature and amount of the adjustments required by paragraph 35 of IFRS 5 (see above) shall be disclosed.
IFRS 5:35 2) Examples of circumstances in which these adjustments may arise include the following:
• the resolution of uncertainties that arise from the terms of the disposal transaction, such as the resolution of
purchase price adjustments and indemnification issues with the purchaser;
• the resolution of uncertainties that arise from and are directly related to the operations of the component
before its disposal, such as environmental and product warranty obligations retained by the seller; and
• the settlement of employee benefit plan obligations, provided that the settlement is directly related to the
disposal transaction.
IFRS 5:36 If an entity ceases to classify a component of an entity as held for sale:
a) the results of operations of the component previously presented in discontinued operations in accordance with
paragraphs 33 to 35 of IFRS 5 (see above) shall be reclassified and included in income from continuing operations
for all periods presented; and
b) the amounts for prior periods shall be described as having been re-presented.
IFRS 5:36A An entity that is committed to a sale plan involving loss of control of a subsidiary shall disclose the information required
in paragraphs 33 to 36 of IFRS 5 (see above) when the subsidiary is a disposal group that meets the definition of a
discontinued operation in accordance with paragraph 32 of IFRS 5.
Gains or losses relating to continuing operations
IFRS 5:37 Any gain or loss on the remeasurement of a non-current asset (or disposal group) classified as held for sale that does not
meet the definition of a discontinued operation shall be included in profit or loss from continuing operations.
Presentation of a non-current asset or disposal group classified as held for sale
IFRS 5:38 An entity shall present a non-current asset classified as held for sale and the assets of a disposal group classified as held
for sale separately from other assets in the statement of financial position.
IFRS 5:38 The liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale shall be presented separately from other liabilities in the
statement of financial position.
IFRS 5:38 Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale shall not be offset and presented as a single amount.
IFRS 5:38 The major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale shall be separately disclosed either in the statement of
financial position or in the notes (except as permitted by paragraph 39 of IFRS 5 – see below).

Notes:
IFRS 5:39 1) If the disposal group is a newly acquired subsidiary that meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale on
acquisition (see paragraph 11 of IFRS 5), disclosure of the major classes of assets and liabilities is not required.
2) Example 12 in the Implementation Guidance accompanying IFRS 5 illustrates how the requirements of paragraph 38
of IFRS 5 might be met.
IFRS 5:38 Any cumulative income or expense recognised in other comprehensive income relating to a non-current asset (or
disposal group) classified as held for sale shall be presented separately.
IFRS 5:40 An entity shall not reclassify or re-present amounts presented for non-current assets or for the assets and liabilities of
disposal groups classified as held for sale in the statement of financial position for prior periods to reflect the
classification in the statement of financial position for the latest period presented.
Additional disclosures
An entity shall disclose the following information in the notes in the period in which a non-current asset (or disposal
group) has been either classified as held for sale or sold:
IFRS 5:41(a) a) a description of the non-current asset (or disposal group);
IFRS 5:41(b) b) a description of the facts and circumstances of the sale, or leading to the expected disposal, and the expected
manner and timing of that disposal;
IFRS 5:41(c) c) the gain or loss recognised in accordance with paragraphs 20 to 22 of IFRS 5 (impairment losses and reversals) and,
if not separately presented in the statement of comprehensive income, the caption in the statement of
comprehensive income that includes that gain or loss; and
IFRS 5:41(d) d) if applicable, the reportable segment in which the non-current asset (or disposal group) is presented in accordance
with IFRS 8 Operating Segments.
Non-current assets (or disposal groups) meeting the criteria for classification as held for sale after the
reporting period
IFRS 5:12 When the criteria in paragraphs 7 and 8 of IFRS 5 for classification as held for sale are met after the reporting period but
before the authorisation of the financial statements for issue, the entity shall disclose the information specified in
paragraphs 41(a), (b) and (d) of IFRS 5 (see above) in the notes to the financial statements.
IFRS 5:12 Note: If the criteria in paragraphs 7 and 8 of IFRS 5 are met after the reporting period, an entity shall not classify a
non-current asset (or disposal group) as held for sale in those financial statements when issued.
Disposal groups that are to be abandoned
IFRS 5:13 If a disposal group to be abandoned meets the criteria for identification of a discontinued operation in paragraphs 32(a)
to 32(c) of IFRS 5, the entity shall present the results and cash flows of the disposal group as discontinued operations in
accordance with paragraphs 33 and 34 of IFRS 5 (see above) at the date on which it ceases to be used.
IFRS 5:13 Note: Non-current assets (or disposal groups) to be abandoned include non-current assets (or disposal groups) that
are to be used to the end of their economic life and non-current assets (or disposal groups) that are to be
closed rather than sold. An entity shall not classify as held for sale a non-current asset (or disposal group) that
is to be abandoned. This is because its carrying amount will be recovered principally through continuing use.
Nevertheless, where a disposal group to be abandoned meets the criteria for a discontinued operation, its
results and cash flows are included within the results and cash flows of discontinued operations at the date on
which it ceases to be used. Example 9 included in the Implementation Guidance accompanying IFRS 5
illustrates this principle.
20

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRS 6, which applies to
expenditures incurred by an entity in connection with the search for mineral resources.
IFRS 6 is an interim Standard. Its principal objective is to limit the need for entities adopting IFRSs to change their
existing accounting policies for exploration and evaluation assets, pending finalisation of a future comprehensive
Standard on this topic. IFRS 6 provides temporary relief for entities involved in extractive activities from applying the
more rigorous requirements of IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors in determining
their accounting policies for exploration and evaluation expenditure.
None
None
Classification of exploration and evaluation assets
IFRS 6:15 An entity shall classify exploration and evaluation assets as tangible or intangible according to the nature of the assets
acquired, and apply the classification consistently.
IFRS 6:16 Note: Some exploration and evaluation assets are treated as intangible (e.g. drilling rights), whereas others are
tangible (e.g. vehicles and drilling rigs). To the extent that a tangible asset is consumed in developing an
intangible asset, the amount reflecting that consumption is part of the cost of the intangible asset. However,
using a tangible asset to develop an intangible asset does not change a tangible asset into an intangible asset.
Reclassification of exploration and evaluation assets
IFRS 6:17 An exploration and evaluation asset shall no longer be classified as such when the technical feasibility and commercial
viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable.
Note: Exploration and evaluation assets shall be assessed for impairment, and any impairment loss recognised,
before reclassification.
Impairment
IFRS 6:18 Any impairment loss recognised in respect of exploration and evaluation assets shall be presented and disclosed in
accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets (see relevant section of this checklist).
Disclosure of information regarding amounts recognised arising from the exploration for and evaluation of
mineral resources
IFRS 6:23 An entity shall disclose information that identifies and explains the amounts recognised in its financial statements arising
from the exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources.
Note: Paragraphs 24 and 25 of IFRS 6, set out below, specify the minimum disclosures required to satisfy this
requirement.
An entity shall disclose:
IFRS 6:24(a) a) its accounting policies for exploration and evaluation expenditures including the recognition of exploration and
evaluation assets; and
IFRS 6:24(b) b) the amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expense and operating and investing cash flows arising from the
exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources.
IFRS 6:25 The entity shall treat exploration and evaluation assets as a separate class of assets and make the disclosures required by
either IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment, or IAS 38 Intangible Assets, consistent with how the assets are classified.
21
IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources

This section of the checklist addresses IFRS 7, which prescribes the disclosure requirements for financial instruments,
both recognised and unrecognised.
Appendix B to IFRS 7 contains application guidance that is an integral part of the Standard. References to the relevant
paragraphs of Appendix B are noted below.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments issued in November 2009 makes a number of consequential amendments to IFRS 7. IFRS 9 is
effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, with earlier application permitted. The consequential
amendments to IFRS 7 should be applied when the entity applies IFRS 9.
This section of the checklist assumes that the entity has not yet adopted IFRS 9 and does not reflect the consequential
amendments to IFRS 7 added by IFRS 9. Entities that have adopted IFRS 9 in advance of its effective date should
complete the next section of this checklist.
None
• Improvements to IFRSs (issued May 2010) make amendments to IFRS 7 to clarify some of the disclosure
requirements. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011, with earlier
application permitted; and
• IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (issued November 2009) makes a number of consequential amendments to IFRS 7
(see next section of checklist).
Classes of financial instruments and level of disclosure
IFRS 7:6 When IFRS 7 requires disclosures by class of financial instrument, the entity shall group financial instruments into classes
that are appropriate to the nature of the information disclosed and that take into account the characteristics of those
financial instruments.
IFRS 7:6 When IFRS 7 requires disclosure by class of financial instrument, the entity shall provide sufficient information to permit
reconciliation to the line items presented in the statement of financial position.
IFRS 7:B1-B3 Notes:
1) The classes of financial instruments described in paragraph 6 of IFRS 7 are determined by the entity and are not the
same as the categories of financial instruments specified in IAS 39.
2) In determining the classes of financial instruments, the entity is required, at a minimum, to distinguish between
instruments measured at amortised cost and those measured at fair value, and to treat as a separate class those
financial instruments that fall outside the scope of IFRS 7.
3) It is necessary to strike a balance between overburdening financial statements with excessive detail that may not
assist users of financial statements and obscuring important information as a result of too much aggregation.
Significance of financial instruments for financial position and performance
IFRS 7:7 An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate the significance of financial
instruments for its financial position and performance.
Statement of financial position
Categories of financial assets and financial liabilities
The carrying amounts of each of the following categories, as defined in IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement, shall be disclosed either in the statement of financial position or in the notes:
IFRS 7:8(a) a) financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, showing separately:
i) those designated as such upon initial recognition; and
22
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures (entity has not yet adopted IFRS 9)

ii) those classified as held for trading in accordance with IAS 39;
IFRS 7:8(b) b) held-to-maturity investments;
IFRS 7:8(c) c) loans and receivables;
IFRS 7:8(d) d) available-for-sale financial assets;
IFRS 7:8(e) e) financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, showing separately:
i) those designated as such upon initial recognition; and
ii) those classified as held for trading in accordance with IAS 39; and
IFRS 7:8(f) f) financial liabilities measured at amortised cost.
Financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
If the entity has designated a loan or receivable (or group of loans or receivables) as at fair value through profit or loss, it
shall disclose:
IFRS 7:9(a) a) the maximum exposure to credit risk of the loan or receivable (or group of loans or receivables) at the end of the
reporting period (see note 1 below);
IFRS 7:9(b) b) the amount by which any related credit derivatives or similar instruments mitigate that maximum exposure to credit
risk;
IFRS 7:9(c) c) the amount of change, during the period and cumulatively, in the fair value of the loan or receivable (or group of
loans or receivables) that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of the financial asset determined either:
i) as the amount of change in its fair value that is not attributable to changes in market conditions that give rise to
market risk (see note 2 below); or
ii) using an alternative method the entity believes more faithfully represents the amount of change in its fair value
that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of the asset; and
IFRS 7:9(d) d) the amount of the change in the fair value of any related credit derivatives or similar instruments that has occurred
during the period and cumulatively since the loan or receivable was designated.
IFRS 7:B9 Notes:
1) The maximum exposure to credit risk reported for financial assets is typically the gross amount net of any amount
offset in accordance with IAS 32 and any impairment losses in terms of IAS 39, i.e. it should not take account of
any collateral held or other credit enhancements (e.g. netting agreements that do not qualify for offset in
accordance with IAS 32).
IFRS 7:9 2) Changes in market conditions that give rise to market risk include changes in an observed (benchmark) interest rate,
commodity price, foreign exchange rate or an index of prices or rates.
If the entity has designated a financial liability as at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with paragraph 9 of
IAS 39, it shall disclose:
IFRS 7:10(a) a) the amount of change, during the period and cumulatively, in the fair value of the financial liability that is
attributable to changes in the credit risk of that liability determined either:
market risk (see also paragraph B4 of IFRS 7, as detailed below); or
that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of the liability; and
IFRS 7:10(b) b) the difference between the financial liability’s carrying amount and the amount the entity would be contractually
required to pay at maturity to the holder of the obligation.

Notes:
IFRS 7:10 1) Changes in market conditions that give rise to market risk include changes in a benchmark interest rate, the price
of another entity’s financial instrument, commodity price, foreign exchange rate or an index of prices or rates.
For contracts that include a unit-linking feature, changes in market conditions include changes in the performance
of the related internal or external investment fund.
IFRS 7:B4 2) If the only relevant changes in market conditions for a liability are changes in an observed (benchmark) interest
rate, the amount of change in fair value not attributable to changes in market conditions can be estimated as
follows:
• compute the liability’s internal rate of return at the start of the period using both the liability’s observed market
price and the contractual cash flows at the start of the period, and then deduct the observed benchmark interest
rate at the start of the period to arrive at an instrument-specific component of the internal rate of return;
• calculate the present value of the cash flows associated with the liability using the liability’s contractual cash flows
at the end of the period and a discount rate equal to the sum of (i) the benchmark interest rate at the end of the
period, and (ii) the instrument-specific component of the internal rate of return (as calculated above); and
• the difference between the observed market price of the liability at the end of the period and the present value of
the contractual cash flows at the end of the period (as calculated above) is the change in fair value not
attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate that shall be disclosed.
If the liability contains an embedded derivative, the change in fair value of the embedded derivative is excluded in
determining the amount to be disclosed under paragraph 10(a) of IFRS 7 (see above).
The entity shall disclose:
IFRS 7:11(a) a) the methods used to determine the amount of change that is attributable to changes in credit risk in compliance
with the requirements in paragraphs 9(c) and 10(a) of IFRS 7 (see above); and
IFRS 7:11(b) b) if the entity believes that the disclosure it has given to comply with the requirements in paragraphs 9(c) or 10(a) of
IFRS 7 does not faithfully represent the change in the fair value of the financial asset or financial liability attributable
to changes in its credit risk, the reasons for reaching this conclusion and the factors it believes are relevant.
Reclassification
If the entity has reclassified a financial asset (in accordance with paragraphs 51 to 54 of IAS 39) as one measured
IFRS 7:12(a) a) at cost or amortised cost, rather than at fair value; or
IFRS 7:12(b) b) at fair value, rather than at cost or amortised cost, it shall disclose the amount reclassified into and out of each
category and the reason for that reclassification (see paragraphs 51 to 54 of IAS 39).
If the entity has reclassified a financial asset out of the fair value through profit or loss category in accordance with
paragraph 50B or 50D of IAS 39 or out of the available-for-sale category in accordance with paragraph 50E of IAS 39, it
shall disclose:
IFRS 7:12A(a) a) the amount reclassified into and out of each category;
IFRS 7:12A(b) b) for each reporting period until derecognition, the carrying amounts and fair values of all financial assets that have
been reclassified in the current and previous reporting periods;
IFRS 7:12A(c) c) if a financial asset was reclassified in accordance with paragraph 50B, the rare situation, and the facts and
circumstances indicating that the situation was rare;
IFRS 7:12A(d) d) for the reporting period when the financial asset was reclassified, the fair value gain or loss on the financial asset
recognised in profit or loss or other comprehensive income in that reporting period and in the previous reporting
period;
IFRS 7:12A(e) e) for each reporting period following the reclassification (including the reporting period in which the financial asset
was reclassified) until derecognition of the financial asset, the fair value gain or loss that would have been
recognised in profit or loss or other comprehensive income if the financial asset had not been reclassified, and the
gain, loss, income and expense recognised in profit or loss; and
IFRS 7:12A(f) f) the effective interest rate and estimated amounts of cash flows the entity expects to recover, as at the date of
reclassification of the financial asset.
24

Derecognition
The entity may have transferred financial assets in such a way that part or all of the financial assets do not qualify for
derecognition (see paragraphs 15 to 37 of IAS 39). The entity shall disclose for each class of such financial assets:
IFRS 7:13(a) a) the nature of the assets not derecognised;
IFRS 7:13(b) b) the nature of the risks and rewards of ownership to which the entity remains exposed;
IFRS 7:13(c) c) when the entity continues to recognise all of the assets, the carrying amounts of the assets and of the associated
liabilities; and
IFRS 7:13(d) d) when the entity continues to recognise the assets to the extent of its continuing involvement, the total carrying
amount of the original assets, the amount of the assets that the entity continues to recognise, and the carrying
amount of the associated liabilities.
Collateral
IFRS 7:14(a) a) the carrying amount of financial assets it has pledged as collateral for liabilities or contingent liabilities, including
amounts that have been reclassified in the statement of financial position (e.g. as a loaned asset, pledged equity
instruments, or repurchase receivable) separately from other assets as the transferee has the right to sell or repledge
the collateral, in accordance with paragraph 37(a) of IAS 39; and
IFRS 7:14(b) b) the terms and conditions relating to its pledge.
IFRS 7:15 When the entity holds collateral (of financial or non-financial assets) and is permitted to sell or repledge the collateral in
the absence of default by the owner of the collateral, it shall disclose:
IFRS 7:15(a) a) the fair value of such collateral held;
IFRS 7:15(b) b) the fair value of any such collateral sold or repledged, and whether the entity has an obligation to return it; and
IFRS 7:15(c) c) the terms and conditions associated with its use of the collateral.
Allowance account for credit losses
IFRS 7:16 When financial assets are impaired by credit losses and the entity records the impairment in a separate account (e.g. an
allowance account used to record individual impairments or a similar account used to record a collective impairment of
assets) rather than directly reducing the carrying amount of the asset, it shall disclose a reconciliation of changes in that
account during the period for each class of financial assets.
Compound financial instruments with multiple embedded derivatives
IFRS 7:17 If the entity has issued an instrument that contains both a liability and an equity component, and the instrument has
multiple embedded derivatives whose values are interdependent (such as a callable convertible debt instrument), it shall
disclose the existence of those features.
Defaults and breaches
For loans payable recognised at the end of the reporting period, the entity shall disclose:
IFRS 7:18(a) a) details of any defaults during the period of principal, interest, sinking fund, or redemption terms of those loans
payable;
IFRS 7:18(b) b) the carrying amount of the loans payable in default at the end of the reporting period; and
IFRS 7:18(c) c) whether the default was remedied, or the terms of the loans payable were renegotiated, before the financial
statements were authorised for issue.
IFRS 7:19 If, during the period, there were breaches of loan agreement terms other than those described in paragraph 18 of IFRS 7
(see above), the entity shall disclose the same information as required by paragraph 18 if those breaches permitted the
lender to demand accelerated repayment (unless the breaches were remedied, or the terms of the loan were
renegotiated, on or before the end of the reporting period).

Statement of comprehensive income
Items of income, expense, gains or losses
The entity shall disclose the following items of income, expense, gains or losses either in the statement of
comprehensive income or in the notes:
IFRS 7:20(a) a) net gains or net losses on:
i) financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, showing separately those on financial
assets or financial liabilities designated as such upon initial recognition, and those on financial assets or financial
liabilities that are classified as held for trading;
ii) available-for-sale financial assets, showing separately the amount of gain or loss recognised in other
comprehensive income during the period and the amount reclassified from equity to profit or loss for the period;
iii) held-to-maturity investments;
iv) loans and receivables; and
v) financial liabilities measured at amortised cost;
IFRS 7:20(b) b) total interest income and total interest expense (calculated using the effective interest method) for financial assets or
financial liabilities that are not at fair value through profit or loss;
IFRS 7:20(c) c) fee income and expense (other than amounts included in determining the effective interest rate) arising from:
i) financial assets or financial liabilities that are not at fair value through profit or loss; and
ii) trust and other fiduciary activities that result in the holding or investing of assets on behalf of individuals, trusts,
retirement benefit plans, and other institutions;
IFRS 7:20(d) d) interest income on impaired financial assets accrued in accordance with paragraph AG93 of IAS 39; and
IFRS 7:20(e) e) the amount of any impairment loss for each class of financial asset.
Other disclosures
Accounting policies
IFRS 7:21 In accordance with paragraph 117 of IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements an entity discloses, in the summary of
significant accounting policies, the measurement basis (or bases) used in preparing the financial statements and the
other accounting policies used that are relevant to an understanding of the financial statements.
IFRS 7:B5 Note:
Accounting policies that are relevant to the understanding of the financial statements may include:
a) for financial assets or financial liabilities designated as at fair value through profit or loss:
i) the nature of the financial assets or financial liabilities the entity has designated as at fair value through profit
or loss;
ii) the criteria for so designating such financial assets or financial liabilities on initial recognition; and
iii) how the entity has satisfied the criteria in paragraphs 9, 11A and 12 of IAS 39 for such designation including,
where appropriate, a narrative description of the circumstances underlying the measurement or recognition
inconsistency that would otherwise arise, or how designation at fair value through profit or loss is consistent
with the entity’s documented risk management or investment strategy;
b) the criteria for designating financial assets as available-for-sale;
c) whether regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are accounted for at trade date or at settlement date;
d) when an allowance account is used to reduce the carrying amount of financial assets impaired by credit losses:
i) the criteria for determining when the carrying amount of impaired financial assets is reduced directly (or, in the
case of a reversal of a write-down, is increased directly) and when the allowance account is used; and
ii) the criteria for writing off amounts charged to the allowance account against the carrying amount of impaired
financial assets;
26

e) how net gains or net losses on each category of financial instruments are determined, for example, whether the net
gains or net losses on items at fair value through profit or loss include interest or dividend income;
f) the criteria the entity uses to determine that there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has occurred; and
g) when the terms of financial assets that would otherwise be past due or impaired have been renegotiated, the
accounting policy for financial assets that are the subject of renegotiated terms.
IFRS 7:B5 Paragraph 122 of IAS 1 also requires entities to disclose, in the summary of significant accounting policies or other
notes, the judgements, apart from those involving estimations, that management has made in the process of applying
the entity’s accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial
statements. Examples of these judgements include how management determines whether financial assets are held-to-
maturity investments, and when substantially all the significant risk and rewards of ownership of financial assets are
transferred to other entities.
Hedge accounting
The entity shall disclose the following separately for each type of hedge (i.e. fair value hedges, cash flow hedges, and
hedges of net investments in foreign operations):
IFRS 7:22(a) a) a description of each type of hedge;
IFRS 7:22(b) b) a description of the financial instruments designated as hedging instruments and their fair values at the end of the
reporting period; and
IFRS 7:22(c) c) the nature of the risks being hedged.
For cash flow hedges, the entity shall disclose:
IFRS 7:23(a) a) the periods when the cash flows are expected to occur and when they are expected to affect profit or loss;
IFRS 7:23(b) b) a description of any forecast transaction for which hedge accounting had previously been used, but which is no
longer expected to occur;
IFRS 7:23(c) c) the amount that was recognised in other comprehensive income during the period;
IFRS 7:23(d) d) the amount that was reclassified from equity to profit or loss for the period, showing the amount included in each
line item in the statement of comprehensive income; and
IFRS 7:23(e) e) the amount that was removed from equity during the period and included in the initial cost or other carrying
amount of a non-financial asset or non-financial liability whose acquisition or incurrence was a hedged highly
probable forecast transaction.
The entity shall disclose separately:
IFRS 7:24(a) a) in fair value hedges, gains or losses:
i) on the hedging instrument; and
ii) on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk;
IFRS 7:24(b) b) in cash flow hedges, the ineffectiveness recognised in profit or loss;
IFRS 7:24(c) c) for hedges of net investments in foreign operations, the ineffectiveness recognised in profit or loss.
Fair value
IFRS 7:25 Except as set out in paragraph 29 of IFRS 7 (see below), for each class of financial assets and financial liabilities, the
entity shall disclose the fair value of that class of assets and liabilities in a way that permits it to be compared with its
carrying amount.
IFRS 7:26 Note: In disclosing fair values, the entity shall group financial assets and financial liabilities into classes, but shall
offset them only to the extent that their carrying amounts are offset in the statement of financial position.
IFRS 7:27 The entity shall disclose for each class of financial instruments the methods and, when a valuation technique is used, the
assumptions applied in determining fair values of each class of financial assets or financial liabilities.
Note: For example, if applicable, an entity discloses information about the assumptions relating to prepayment rates,
rates of estimated credit losses and interest or discount rates.

IFRS 7:27 If there has been a change in valuation technique, the entity shall disclose that change and the reason for making it.
IFRS 7:27B For fair value measurements recognised in the statement of financial position an entity shall disclose for each class of
financial instruments:
IFRS 7:27B Note: The entity shall present the quantitative disclosures required by paragraph 27B of IFRS 7 (see below) in tabular
format unless another format is more appropriate.
IFRS 7:27B(a) a) the level in the fair value hierarchy into which the fair value measurements are categorised in their entirety,
segregating fair value measurements in accordance with the levels defined in paragraph 27A (see above);
IFRS 7:27B(b) b) any significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for those transfers,
separately for:
i) transfers into each level; and
ii) transfers out of each level.
Note: For the purpose of disclosing transfers into and out of each level, significance shall be judged with respect to
profit or loss, and total assets or total liabilities.
IFRS 7:27B(c) c) for fair value measurements in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, a reconciliation from the beginning balances to the
ending balances, disclosing separately changes during the period attributable to the following:
i) total gains or losses for the period recognised in profit or loss, and a description of where they are presented in
the statement of comprehensive income or the separate income statement (if presented);
ii) total gains or losses recognised in other comprehensive income;
iii) purchases, sales, issues and settlements (each type of movement disclosed separately); and
iv) transfers into or out of Level 3 (e.g. transfers attributable to changes in the observability of market data) and the
reasons for those transfers. For significant transfers, transfers into Level 3 shall be disclosed and discussed
separately from transfers out of Level 3;
IFRS 7:27B(d) d) the amount of total gains or losses for the period in (c)(i) above included in profit or loss that are attributable to
gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities held at the end of the reporting period and a description of
where those gains or losses are presented in the statement of comprehensive income or the separate income
statement (if presented); and
IFRS 7:27B(e) e) for fair value measurements in Level 3, if changing one or more of the inputs to reasonably possible alternative
assumptions would change fair value significantly, the entity shall:
i) state that fact;
ii) disclose the effect of those changes; and
iii) disclose how the effect of a change to a reasonably possible alternative assumption was calculated.
Note: For the purpose of the disclosures according to paragraph 27B(e) of IFRS 7, significance shall be judged with
respect to profit or loss, and total assets or total liabilities, or, when changes in fair value are recognised in
other comprehensive income, total equity.
IFRS 7:27A Notes:
1) To make the disclosures required by paragraph 27B (see below), an entity shall classify fair value measurements
using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. The fair
value hierarchy shall have the following levels:
• quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1);
• inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices) (Level 2); and
• inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs) (Level 3).
28

2. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety shall be
determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
For this purpose, the significance of an input is assessed against the fair value measurement in its entirety. If a fair
value measurement uses observable inputs that require significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, that
measurement is a level 3 measurement. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgement, considering factors specific to the asset or liability.
IFRS 7:44G 3. Paragraph 27 was amended and paragraphs 27A and 27B were added by Improving Disclosures about Financial
Instruments (Amendments to IFRS 7), issued in March 2009 and effective for annual periods beginning on or after
1 January 2009 (with earlier application permitted)). An entity need not provide the disclosures required by the
amendments for any statement of financial position as at the beginning of the earliest comparative period as at
a date before 31 December 2009.
IFRS 7:28 When the market for a financial instrument is not active, if a difference exists between the fair value at initial recognition
and the amount that would be determined at that date using a valuation technique (see note below), the entity shall
disclose, by class of financial instrument:
IFRS 7:28(a) a) its accounting policy for recognising that difference in profit or loss to reflect a change in factors (including time)
that market participants would consider in setting a price (see paragraph AG76A of IAS 39); and
IFRS 7:28(b) b) the aggregate difference yet to be recognised in profit or loss at the beginning and end of the period together with
a reconciliation of changes in the balance of this difference.
IFRS 7:28 Note: If the market for a financial instrument is not active, an entity establishes its fair value using a valuation
technique (see paragraphs AG74-AG79 of IAS 39). Nevertheless, the best evidence of fair value at initial
recognition is the transaction price (i.e. the fair value of the consideration given or received), unless the fair
value of the instrument concerned is evidenced by comparison with other observable current market
transactions in the same instrument (i.e. without modification or repackaging) or based on a valuation
technique whose variables included only data from observable markets. It follows that there could be a
difference between the fair value at initial recognition and the amount that would be determined at that date
using the valuation technique.
Disclosures of fair value are not required:
IFRS 7:29(a) a) when the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value (e.g. for financial instruments such as short-
term trade receivables and payables);
IFRS 7:29(b) b) for an investment in equity instruments that do not have a quoted market price in an active market, or derivatives
linked to such equity instruments, that is measured at cost because its fair value cannot be measured reliably; or
IFRS 7:29(c) c) for a contract containing a discretionary participation feature (as described in IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts) if the fair
value of that feature cannot be measured reliably.
IFRS 7:30 In the cases described in paragraphs 29(b) and (c) of IFRS 7 (see above), the entity shall disclose information to help
users of the financial statements make their own judgements about the extent of possible differences between the
carrying amount of those financial assets or financial liabilities and their fair value, including:
IFRS 7:30(a) a) the fact that fair value information has not been disclosed for these instruments because their fair value cannot be
measured reliably;
IFRS 7:30(b) b) a description of the financial instruments, their carrying amount, and an explanation of why fair value cannot be
measured reliably;
IFRS 7:30(c) c) information about the market for the instruments;
IFRS 7:30(d) d) information about whether and how the entity intends to dispose of the financial instruments; and
IFRS 7:30(e) e) if financial instruments whose fair value previously could not be reliably measured are derecognised, that fact, their
carrying amount at the time of derecognition, and the amount of gain or loss recognised.

Nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments
IFRS 7:31 The entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate the nature and extent of
risks arising from financial instruments to which the entity is exposed at the end of the reporting period.
IFRS 7:32 Notes:
1) The financial instrument risk disclosures required by paragraphs 33 to 42 of IFRS 7 (see below) focus on the risks
that arise from financial instruments and how they have been managed. These risks typically include, but are not
limited to, credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk.
IFRS 7:32A 2) Providing qualitative disclosures in the context of quantitative disclosures enables users to link related disclosures
and hence form an overall picture of the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments. The
interaction between qualitative and quantitative disclosures contributes to disclosure of information in a way that
better enables users to evaluate an entity’s exposure to risks.
IFRS 7:B6 3) The financial risk disclosures required by paragraphs 31 to 42 of IFRS 7 (see above and below) should be given
either in the financial statements or incorporated by cross-reference from the financial statements to some other
statement, such as a management commentary or risk report that is available to users of the financial statements
on the same terms as the financial statements and at the same time. Without the information incorporated by
cross-reference, the financial statements are incomplete.
Note: Paragraph 32A was added by Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010. An entity shall apply those
amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. Earlier application is permitted.
Qualitative disclosures
For each type of risk arising from financial instruments, the entity shall disclose:
IFRS 7:33(a) a) the exposures to that risk and how they arise;
IFRS 7:33(b) b) its objectives, policies and processes for managing the risk and the methods used to measure the risk; and
IFRS 7:33(c) c) any changes in 33(a) or (b) (see above) from the previous period.
Quantitative disclosures
IFRS 7:34(a) a) summary quantitative data about its exposure to that risk at the end of the reporting period. This disclosure shall be
based on the information provided internally to key management personnel of the entity (as defined in IAS 24
Related Party Disclosures) (e.g. the entity’s board of directors or chief executive officer);
IFRS 7:B7 Note: When an entity uses several methods to manage a risk exposure, the method or methods that provide the
most relevant and reliable information should be disclosed. IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors discusses relevance and reliability.
IFRS 7:34(b) b) the disclosures required by paragraphs 36 to 42 of IFRS 7 (see below), to the extent not provided in paragraph 34(a)
(see above), unless the risk is not material; and
IFRS 7:34(b) Note: See paragraphs 29 to 31 of IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements for a discussion of materiality.
IFRS 7:34(b) b) the disclosures required by paragraphs 36 to 42 of IFRS 7 (see below), to the extent not provided in accordance with
34(a) (see above)
IFRS 7:34(c) c) concentrations of risk if not apparent from 34(a) and (b) (see above).
IFRS 7:34(c) c) concentrations of risk if not apparent from the disclosures made in accordance with 34(a) and (b) (see above).
Note: Paragraphs 34(b) and 34(c) were amended by Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010. An entity shall apply
those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. Earlier application is permitted.
30

Disclosures of risk shall include:
IFRS 7:B8(a) a) a description of how management determines concentrations;
IFRS 7:B8(b) b) a description of the shared characteristics that identifies each concentration (e.g. counterparty, geographical area,
currency or market); and
IFRS 7:B8(c) c) the amount of the risk exposure associated with all financial instruments sharing that characteristic.
IFRS 7:B8 Note: Concentrations of risk arise from financial instruments that have similar characteristics and are affected
similarly by changes in economic or other conditions. The identification of concentrations of risk requires
judgement taking into account the circumstances of the entity.
IFRS 7:35 If the quantitative data disclosed as at the end of the reporting period are unrepresentative of an entity’s exposure to risk
during the period, the entity shall provide further information that is representative.
Credit risk
The entity shall disclose by class of financial instrument:
IFRS 7:36(a) a) the amount that best represents its maximum exposure to credit risk at the end of the reporting period without
taking account of any collateral held or other credit enhancements (e.g. netting agreements that do not qualify for
offset in accordance with IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation) (see also IFRS 7:B9 and B10);
IFRS 7:36(b) b) in respect of the amount disclosed in 36(a) (see above), a description of collateral held as security and other credit
enhancements;
IFRS 7:36(c) c) information about the credit quality of financial assets that are neither past due nor impaired; and
IFRS 7:36(d) d) the carrying amount of financial assets that would otherwise be past due or impaired whose terms have been
renegotiated.
offset in accordance with IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation) (see also IFRS 7:B9 and B10 below);
Note: This disclosure is not required for financial instruments whose carrying amount best represents the maximum
exposure to credit risk.
IFRS 7:36(b) b) a description of collateral held as security and of other credit enhancements, and their financial effect (e.g. a
quantification of the extent to which collateral and other credit enhancements mitigate credit risk) in respect of the
amount that best represents the maximum exposure to credit risk (whether disclosed in accordance with IFRS 7:36(a)
(see above) or represented by the carrying amount of a financial instrument);
IFRS 7:36(c) c) information about the credit quality of financial assets that are neither past due nor impaired.
d) [deleted];
Note: Paragraph 36 of IFRS 7 was amended by Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010. An entity shall apply those
Notes:
IFRS 7:B9 1) For a financial asset, the entity’s maximum exposure to credit risk is typically the gross carrying amount net of any
amounts offset in accordance with IAS 32 and any impairment losses recognised in accordance with IAS 39.
IFRS 7:B10 2) Activities that give rise to credit risk include, but are not limited to, granting loans, placing deposits, granting
financial guarantees, making irrevocable loan commitments and entering into derivative contracts. Further
guidance for determining the maximum credit exposure in each of these instances is included in IFRS 7:B10.

For financial assets that are either past due or impaired, the entity shall disclose by class of financial asset:
IFRS 7:37(a) a) an analysis of the age of financial assets that are past due as at the end of the reporting period but not impaired;
IFRS 7:37(b) b) an analysis of financial assets that are individually determined to be impaired as at the end of the reporting period,
including the factors the entity considered in determining that they are impaired; and
IFRS 7:37(c) c) for the amounts disclosed in 37(a) and (b) (see above), a description of collateral held by the entity as security and
other credit enhancements and, unless impracticable, an estimate of their fair value.
IFRS 7:37(a) a) an analysis of the age of financial assets that are past due as at the end of the reporting period but not impaired; and
including the factors the entity considered in determining that they are impaired.
IFRS 7:37(c) c) [deleted]
IFRS 7:38 When the entity obtains financial or non-financial assets during the period by taking possession of collateral it holds as
security or calling on other credit enhancements (e.g. guarantees), and such assets meet the recognition criteria in other
IFRSs, the entity shall disclose:
IFRS 7:38(a) a) the nature and carrying amount of the assets obtained; and
IFRS 7:38(b) b) when the assets are not readily convertible into cash, its policies for disposing of such assets or for using them in its
operations.
IFRSs, the entity shall disclose for such assets held at the reporting date:
IFRS 7:38(a) a) the nature and carrying amount of the assets; and
operations.
Liquidity risk
IFRS 7:39(a) a) a maturity analysis for non-derivative financial liabilities (including issued financial guarantee contracts) that shows
the remaining contractual maturities;
IFRS 7:39(b) b) a maturity analysis for derivative financial liabilities. The maturity analysis shall include the remaining contractual
maturities for those derivative financial liabilities for which contractual maturities are essential for an understanding
of the timing of the cash flows (see paragraph B11B);
IFRS 7:39(c) c) a description of how it manages the liquidity risk inherent in 39(a) and 39(b) (see above).
IFRS 7:B10A The entity shall explain how the summary quantitative data about its exposure to liquidity risk are determined.
IFRS 7:B10A If the outflows of cash (or another financial asset) included in those data could either:
a) occur significantly earlier than indicated in the data, or
b) be for significantly different amounts from those indicated in the data (e.g. for a derivative that is not included in the
data on a net settlement basis but for which the counterparty has the option to require gross settlement),
the entity shall state that fact and provide quantitative information that enables users of its financial statements to
evaluate the extent of this risk unless that information is included in the contractual maturity analyses required by
paragraph 39(a) or (b).
32

Notes:
IFRS 7:B10A 1) In accordance with paragraph 34(a), an entity discloses summary quantitative data about its exposure to liquidity
risk on the basis of the information provided internally to key management personnel.
IFRS 7:B11 2) When preparing a maturity analysis required by paragraph 39(a) and (b) of IFRS 7 an entity must use its judgement
to determine an appropriate number of time bands.
For example, an entity might determine that the following time bands are appropriate:
a) not later than one month;
b) later than one month and not later than three months;
c) later than three months and not later than one year; and
d) later than one year and not later than five years.
IFRS 7:B11A 3) When preparing a maturity analysis required by paragraph 39(a) and (b) of IFRS 7, an entity does not separate an
embedded derivative from a hybrid (combined) financial instrument. For such an instrument, an entity is required to
apply the requirements of paragraph 39(a).
IFRS 7:B11B 4) Disclosure of a quantitative maturity analysis for derivative financial liabilities (see paragraph 39(b) above) that
shows remaining contractual maturities is required if the contractual maturities are essential for an understanding
of the timing of the cash flows. For example, this would be the case for:
a) an interest rate swap with a remaining maturity of five years in a cash flow hedge of a variable rate financial
asset or liability.
b) all loan commitments.
IFRS 7:B11C 5) In the disclosure of maturity analyses for financial liabilities that show the remaining contractual maturities for
some financial liabilities:
a) when a counterparty has a choice of when an amount is paid, the liability is allocated to the earliest period in
which the entity can be required to pay. For example, financial liabilities that an entity can be required to repay
on demand (e.g. demand deposits) are included in the earliest time band.
b) when an entity is committed to make amounts available in instalments, each instalment is allocated to the
earliest period in which the entity can be required to pay. For example, an undrawn loan commitment is
included in the time band containing the earliest date it can be drawn down.
c) for issued financial guarantee contracts the maximum amount of the guarantee is allocated to the earliest
period in which the guarantee could be called.
IFRS 7:B11D 6) The contractual amounts disclosed in the maturity analyses as required by paragraph 39(a) and (b) are the
contractual undiscounted cash flows.
For example:
a) gross finance lease obligations (before deducting finance charge);
b) prices specified in forward agreements to purchase financial assets for cash;
c) net amounts for pay-floating/receive-fixed interest rate swaps for which net cash flows are exchanged;
d) contractual amounts to be exchanged in a derivative financial instrument (e.g. a currency swap) for which
gross cash flows are exchanged; and
e) gross loan commitments.
Such undiscounted cash flows differ from the amount included in the statement of financial position because the
amount in that statement is based on discounted cash flows. When the amount payable is not fixed, the amount
disclosed is determined by reference to the conditions existing at the end of the reporting period. For example, when
the amount payable varies with changes in an index, the amount disclosed may be based on the level of the index at
the end of the period.

34
IFRS 7:B11E In describing how an entity manages the liquidity risk inherent in the items disclosed in the quantitative disclosures
required in paragraph 39(a) and 39(b) of IFRS 7 (as required by paragraph 39(c) of IFRS 7), an entity shall disclose a
maturity analysis of financial assets it holds for managing liquidity risk (e.g. financial assets that are readily saleable or
expected to generate cash inflows to meet cash outflows on financial liabilities), if that information is necessary to
enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the nature and extent of liquidity risk.
IFRS 7:B11F Other factors that an entity might consider in providing the disclosure required in paragraph 39(c) include, but are not
limited to, whether the entity:
a) has committed borrowing facilities (e.g. commercial paper facilities) or other lines of credit (e.g. stand-by credit
facilities) that it can access to meet liquidity needs;
b) holds deposits at central banks to meet liquidity needs;
c) has very diverse funding sources;
d) has significant concentrations of liquidity risk in either its assets or its funding sources;
e) has internal control processes and contingency plans for managing liquidity risk;
f) has instruments that include accelerated repayment terms (e.g. on the downgrade of the entity’s credit rating);
g) has instruments that could require the posting of collateral (e.g. margin calls for derivatives);
h) has instruments that allow the entity to choose whether it settles its financial liabilities by delivering cash (or another
financial asset) or by delivering its own shares; or
i) has instruments that are subject to master netting agreements.
Market risk
Unless the entity complies with paragraph 41 of IFRS 7 (see below), it shall disclose:
IFRS 7:40(a) a) a sensitivity analysis for each type of market risk to which the entity is exposed at the end of the reporting period,
showing how profit or loss and equity would have been affected by changes in the relevant risk variable that were
reasonably possible at that date;
IFRS 7:40(b) b) the methods and assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analysis; and
IFRS 7:40(c) c) changes from the previous period in the methods and assumptions used, and the reasons for such changes.
IFRS 7:B17 to B28 Notes:
1) An entity decides how it aggregates information to display the overall picture without combining information with
different characteristics about exposures to risks from significantly different economic environments. If an entity has
exposure to only one type of market risk in only one economic environment, it would not show disaggregated
information.
2) An entity is not required to determine what the profit or loss for the period would have been if the relevant risk
variable had been different. Instead, an entity discloses the effect on profit or loss and equity at the end of the
reporting period assuming that a reasonably possible change in the relevant risk variable had occurred at the end
of the reporting period and had been applied to the risk exposures in existence at that date. In determining this
effect, the entity should consider the economic environment in which it operates. A ‘reasonably possible change’
should not include remote or ‘worst case’ scenarios or ‘stress tests’.
3) The sensitivity analysis should show the effects of changes that are considered to be reasonably possible over the
period until the end of the next reporting period.
4) An entity is not required to disclose the effect on profit or loss and equity for each change within a range of
reasonably possible changes of the relevant risk variable. Disclosure of the effects of the changes at the limits of the
reasonably possible range would be sufficient.
5) An entity shall provide sensitivity analyses for the whole of its business, but may provide different types of sensitivity
analysis for different classes of financial instruments. For example, a sensitivity analysis would be disclosed for each
currency to which an entity has significant exposure.
6) Interest rate risk arises on interest-bearing financial instruments recognised in the statement of financial position
(e.g. debt instruments acquired or issued) and on some financial instruments not recognised in the statement of
financial position (e.g. some loan commitments).

7) Currency risk arises on financial instruments that are denominated in a foreign currency, i.e. in a currency other
than the functional currency in which they are measured (see IAS 21 for definition of functional currency).Currency
risk does not arise from financial instruments that are non-monetary items or from financial instruments
denominated in the functional currency.
8) A sensitivity analysis is disclosed for each currency to which an entity has significant exposure.
9) Other price risk arises on financial instruments because of changes in, for example, commodity prices or equity
prices. An entity might disclose the effect of a decrease in a specified stock market index, commodity price, or other
risk variable. For example, if an entity gives residual value guarantees that are financial instruments, the entity
discloses an increase or decrease in the value of the assets to which the guarantee applies.
10) No sensitivity analysis is required for financial instruments that an entity classifies as its own equity instruments,
nor for non-monetary items.
11) Separate analysis is disclosed for:
a) sensitivity of profit or loss that arises, for example, from instruments measured at fair value through profit or
loss: and
b) sensitivity of other comprehensive income that arises, for example, from investments in equity instruments
whose changes in fair value are presented in other comprehensive income.
IFRS 7:41 If the entity prepares a sensitivity analysis, such as value-at-risk, that reflects interdependencies between risk variables
(e.g. interest rates and exchange rates) and uses it to manage financial risks, it may use that sensitivity analysis in place of
the analysis specified in paragraph 40 of IFRS 7 (see above).
IFRS 7:B20 Note: This applies even if such a methodology measures only the potential for loss and does not measure the
potential for gain.
In the circumstances described in paragraph 41 of IFRS 7 (see above), the entity shall also disclose:
IFRS 7:41(a) a) an explanation of the method used in preparing such a sensitivity analysis, and of the main parameters and
assumptions underlying the data provided; and
IFRS 7:B20 Notes:
1) An entity may comply with paragraph 41(a) of IFRS 7 by disclosing the type of value-at-risk model used (for
example whether the model relies on Monte Carlo simulations), an explanation about how the model works and
the main assumptions (for example the holding period and confidence level).
2) An entity may also disclose the historical observation period and weightings applied to observations within that
period, an explanation of how options are dealt with in the calculations, and which volatilities and correlations
(or, alternatively, Monte Carlo probability distribution simulations) are used.
IFRS 7:41(b) b) an explanation of the objective of the method used and of limitations that may result in the information not fully
reflecting the fair value of the assets and liabilities involved.
IFRS 7:42 When the sensitivity analyses disclosed in accordance with paragraphs 40 or 41 of IFRS 7 (see above) are
unrepresentative of a risk inherent in a financial instrument (for example, because the year-end exposure does not reflect
the exposure during the year), the entity shall disclose that fact and the reason it believes the sensitivity analyses are
unrepresentative.
IFRS 7.44L If the entity has applied paragraph 32A and amended paragraphs 34 and 36-38 arising from Improvements to IFRSs
issued in May 2010 before 1 January 2011 it shall disclose that fact.

This section of the checklist addresses IFRS 7, which prescribes the disclosure requirements for financial instruments,
both recognised and unrecognised.
Appendix B to IFRS 7 contains application guidance that is an integral part of the Standard. References to the relevant
paragraphs of Appendix B are noted below.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments issued in November 2009 makes a number of consequential amendments to IFRS 7. IFRS 9
is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, with earlier application permitted. The
consequential amendments to IFRS 7 should be applied when the entity applies IFRS 9.
This section of the checklist should be completed if and only if the entity has adopted IFRS 9 in advance of its effective
date. The presentation and disclosure requirements in IFRS 7 for entities that have not yet adopted IFRS 9 are set out in
the preceding section of this checklist.
None
• Improvements to IFRSs (issued May 2010) make amendments to IFRS 7 to clarify some of the disclosure
requirements. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011, with earlier
Classes of financial instruments and level of disclosure
IFRS 7:6 When IFRS 7 requires disclosures by class of financial instrument, the entity shall group financial instruments into classes
that are appropriate to the nature of the information disclosed and that take into account the characteristics of those
financial instruments.
IFRS 7:6 When IFRS 7 requires disclosure by class of financial instrument, the entity shall provide sufficient information to permit
reconciliation to the line items presented in the statement of financial position.
IFRS 7:B1-B3 Notes:
1) The classes of financial instruments described in paragraph 6 of IFRS 7 are determined by the entity and are not the
same as the categories of financial instruments specified in IAS 39 and IFRS 9.
2) In determining the classes of financial instruments, the entity is required, at a minimum, to distinguish between
instruments measured at amortised cost and those measured at fair value, and to treat as a separate class those
financial instruments that fall outside the scope of IFRS 7.
3) It is necessary to strike a balance between overburdening financial statements with excessive detail that may not
assist users of financial statements and obscuring important information as a result of too much aggregation.
Note: IFRS 9, issued in November 2009, amended paragraph B1 of IFRS 7. The amendments should be applied when
the entity applies IFRS 9.
Significance of financial instruments for financial position and performance
IFRS 7:7 An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate the significance of financial
instruments for its financial position and performance.
36
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures (entity has adopted IFRS 9)

IFRS 7:8 Categories of financial assets and financial liabilities
The carrying amounts of each of the following categories, as specified in IFRS 9 Financial Instruments or IAS 39 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, shall be disclosed either in the statement of financial position or in the notes:
a) financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss, showing separately
IFRS 7:8(a) (i) those designated as such upon initial recognition and
(ii) those mandatorily measured at fair value in accordance with IFRS 9;
b) –(d) [deleted];
IFRS 7:8(e) e) financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, showing separately
(i) those designated as such upon initial recognition; and
IFRS 7:8(f) (ii) those that meet the definition of held for trading in IAS 39;
IFRS 7:8(g) f) financial assets measured at amortised cost;
IFRS 7:8(h) g) financial liabilities measured at amortised cost; and
h) financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.
Note: IFRS 9, issued in November 2009, amended paragraph 8 of IFRS 7. The amendments should be applied when
Financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
IFRS 7:9(a) If the entity has designated as measured at fair value a financial asset (or group of financial assets) that would otherwise
be measured at amortised cost, it shall disclose:
a) The maximum exposure to credit risk of the financial asset (or group of financial assets) at the end of the reporting
period. (see note 1 above).
IFRS 7:9(b) b) The amount by which any related credit derivatives or similar instruments mitigate that maximum exposure to credit
risk.
IFRS 7:9(c) c) The amount of change, during the period and cumulatively, in the fair value of the financial assets (or group of
financial assets) that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of the financial asset determined either:
(i) as the amount of change in its fair value that is not attributable to changes in market conditions that give rise to
market risk (see note 2 above); or
(ii) using an alternative method the entity believes more faithfully represents the amount of change in its fair value
that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of the asset; and
IFRS 7:9(d) d) the amount of the change in the fair value of any related credit derivatives or similar instruments that has occurred
during the period and cumulatively since the financial asset was designated.
IFRS 7:B9 Notes:
1) The maximum exposure to credit risk reported for financial assets is typically the gross amount net of any amount
offset in accordance with IAS 32 and any impairment losses in terms of IAS 39, i.e. it should not take account of
any collateral held or other credit enhancements (e.g. netting agreements that do not qualify for offset in
accordance with IAS 32).
IFRS 7:9 2) Changes in market conditions that give rise to market risk include changes in an observed (benchmark) interest
rate, commodity price, foreign exchange rate or an index of prices or rates.

If the entity has designated a financial liability as at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with paragraph 9 of
IAS 39, it shall disclose:
IFRS 7:10(a) a) the amount of change, during the period and cumulatively, in the fair value of the financial liability that is
attributable to changes in the credit risk of that liability determined either:
market risk (see also paragraph B4 of IFRS 7, as detailed below); or
that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of the liability; and
IFRS 7:10(b) b) the difference between the financial liability’s carrying amount and the amount the entity would be contractually
required to pay at maturity to the holder of the obligation.
Notes:
IFRS 7:10 1) Changes in market conditions that give rise to market risk include changes in a benchmark interest rate, the price
of another entity’s financial instrument, commodity price, foreign exchange rate or an index of prices or rates.
For contracts that include a unit-linking feature, changes in market conditions include changes in the performance
of the related internal or external investment fund.
IFRS 7:B4 2) If the only relevant changes in market conditions for a liability are changes in an observed (benchmark) interest
rate, the amount of change in fair value not attributable to changes in market conditions can be estimated as
follows:
• compute the liability’s internal rate of return at the start of the period using both the liability’s observed market
price and the contractual cash flows at the start of the period, and then deduct the observed benchmark
interest rate at the start of the period to arrive at an instrument-specific component of the internal rate of
return;
• calculate the present value of the cash flows associated with the liability using the liability’s contractual cash
flows at the end of the period and a discount rate equal to the sum of (i) the benchmark interest rate at the end
of the period, and (ii) the instrument-specific component of the internal rate of return (as calculated above);
and
• the difference between the observed market price of the liability at the end of the period and the present value
of the contractual cash flows at the end of the period (as calculated above) is the change in fair value not
attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate that shall be disclosed.
If the liability contains an embedded derivative, the change in fair value of the embedded derivative is excluded in
determining the amount to be disclosed under paragraph 10(a) of IFRS 7 (see above).
IFRS 7:11(a) a) the methods used to determine the amount of change that is attributable to changes in credit risk in compliance
with the requirements in paragraphs 9(c) and 10(a) of IFRS 7 (see above); and
IFRS 7:11(b) b) if the entity believes that the disclosure it has given to comply with the requirements in paragraphs 9(c) or 10(a) of
IFRS 7 does not faithfully represent the change in the fair value of the financial asset or financial liability attributable
to changes in its credit risk, the reasons for reaching this conclusion and the factors it believes are relevant.
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
IFRS 7:11A If the entity has designated investments in equity instruments to be measured at fair value through other comprehensive
income, as permitted by paragraph 5.4.4 of IFRS 9, it shall disclose:
IFRS 7:11A(a) a) which investments in equity instruments have been designated to be measured at fair value through other
comprehensive income;
IFRS 7:11A(b) b) the reasons for using this presentation alternative;
IFRS 7:11A(c) c) the fair value of each such investment at the end of the reporting period;
IFRS 7:11A(d) d) dividends recognised during the period, showing separately
i. those related to investments derecognised during the reporting period; and
ii. those related to investments held at the end of the reporting period; and
38

IFRS 7:11A(e) e) any transfers of the cumulative gain or loss within equity during the period including the reason for such transfers.
IFRS 7:11B If the entity derecognised investments in equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
during the reporting period, it shall disclose:
a) the reasons for disposing of the investments;
b) the fair value of the investments at the date of derecognition; and
c) the cumulative gain or loss on disposal.
Note: IFRS 9, issued in November 2009, added paragraphs 11A and 11B (above). The amendments should be applied
when the entity applies IFRS 9.
Reclassification
If the entity has reclassified a financial asset (in accordance with paragraphs 51 to 54 of IAS 39) as one measured
IFRS 7:12(a) a) at cost or amortised cost, rather than at fair value; or
IFRS 7:12(b) b) at fair value, rather than at cost or amortised cost,
it shall disclose the amount reclassified into and out of each category and the reason for that reclassification (see
paragraphs 51 to 54 of IAS 39).
If the entity has reclassified a financial asset out of the fair value through profit or loss category in accordance with
paragraph 50B or 50D of IAS 39 or out of the available-for-sale category in accordance with paragraph 50E of IAS 39, it
shall disclose:
IFRS 7:12A(a) a) the amount reclassified into and out of each category;
IFRS 7:12A(b) b) for each reporting period until derecognition, the carrying amounts and fair values of all financial assets that have
been reclassified in the current and previous reporting periods;
IFRS 7:12A(c) c) if a financial asset was reclassified in accordance with paragraph 50B, the rare situation, and the facts and
circumstances indicating that the situation was rare;
IFRS 7:12A(d) d) for the reporting period when the financial asset was reclassified, the fair value gain or loss on the financial asset
recognised in profit or loss or other comprehensive income in that reporting period and in the previous reporting
period;
IFRS 7:12A(e) e) for each reporting period following the reclassification (including the reporting period in which the financial asset
was reclassified) until derecognition of the financial asset, the fair value gain or loss that would have been
recognised in profit or loss or other comprehensive income if the financial asset had not been reclassified, and the
gain, loss, income and expense recognised in profit or loss; and
IFRS 7:12A(f) f) the effective interest rate and estimated amounts of cash flows the entity expects to recover, as at the date of
reclassification of the financial asset.
Reclassification
IFRS 7:12B An entity shall disclose if, in the current or previous reporting periods, it has reclassified any financial assets in
accordance with paragraph 4.9 of IFRS 9. For each such event, an entity shall disclose:
IFRS 7:12B(a) a) the date of reclassification;
IFRS 7:12B(b) b) a detailed explanation of the change in business model and a qualitative description of its effect on the entity’s
financial statements; and
IFRS 7:12B(c) c) the amount reclassified into and out of each category.
IFRS 7:12C For each reporting period following reclassification until derecognition, an entity shall disclose for assets reclassified so
that they are measured at amortised cost in accordance with paragraph 4.9 of IFRS 9:
a) the effective interest rate determined on the date of reclassification; and
b) the interest income or expense recognised.

IFRS 7:12D If an entity has reclassified financial assets so that they are measured at amortised cost since its last annual reporting
date, it shall disclose:
a) the fair value of the financial assets at the end of the reporting period; and
b) the fair value gain or loss that would have been recognised in profit or loss during the reporting period if the
financial assets had not been reclassified.
Note: IFRS 9, issued in November 2009, added paragraphs 12B-12D and deleted paragraphs 12 and 12A in IFRS 7.
The amendments should be applied when the entity applies IFRS 9.
Derecognition
The entity may have transferred financial assets in such a way that part or all of the financial assets do not qualify for
derecognition (see paragraphs 15 to 37 of IAS 39). The entity shall disclose for each class of such financial assets:
IFRS 7:13(a) a) the nature of the assets not derecognised;
IFRS 7:13(b) b) the nature of the risks and rewards of ownership to which the entity remains exposed;
IFRS 7:13(c) c) when the entity continues to recognise all of the assets, the carrying amounts of the assets and of the associated
liabilities; and
IFRS 7:13(d) d) when the entity continues to recognise the assets to the extent of its continuing involvement, the total carrying
amount of the original assets, the amount of the assets that the entity continues to recognise, and the carrying
amount of the associated liabilities.
Collateral
IFRS 7:14(a) a) the carrying amount of financial assets it has pledged as collateral for liabilities or contingent liabilities, including
amounts that have been reclassified in the statement of financial position (e.g. as a loaned asset, pledged equity
instruments, or repurchase receivable) separately from other assets as the transferee has the right to sell or repledge
the collateral, in accordance with paragraph 37(a) of IAS 39; and
IFRS 7:14(b) b) the terms and conditions relating to its pledge.
IFRS 7:15 When the entity holds collateral (of financial or non-financial assets) and is permitted to sell or repledge the collateral in
the absence of default by the owner of the collateral, it shall disclose:
IFRS 7:15(a) a) the fair value of such collateral held;
IFRS 7:15(b) b) the fair value of any such collateral sold or repledged, and whether the entity has an obligation to return it; and
IFRS 7:15(c) c) the terms and conditions associated with its use of the collateral.
Allowance account for credit losses
IFRS 7:16 When financial assets are impaired by credit losses and the entity records the impairment in a separate account (e.g. an
allowance account used to record individual impairments or a similar account used to record a collective impairment of
assets) rather than directly reducing the carrying amount of the asset, it shall disclose a reconciliation of changes in that
account during the period for each class of financial assets.
Compound financial instruments with multiple embedded derivatives
IFRS 7:17 If the entity has issued an instrument that contains both a liability and an equity component, and the instrument has
multiple embedded derivatives whose values are interdependent (such as a callable convertible debt instrument), it shall
disclose the existence of those features.
Defaults and breaches
For loans payable recognised at the end of the reporting period, the entity shall disclose:
IFRS 7:18(a) a) details of any defaults during the period of principal, interest, sinking fund, or redemption terms of those loans payable;
IFRS 7:18(b) b) the carrying amount of the loans payable in default at the end of the reporting period; and
IFRS 7:18(c) c) whether the default was remedied, or the terms of the loans payable were renegotiated, before the financial
statements were authorised for issue.
40

IFRS 7:19 If, during the period, there were breaches of loan agreement terms other than those described in paragraph 18 of IFRS 7
(see above), the entity shall disclose the same information as required by paragraph 18 if those breaches permitted the
lender to demand accelerated repayment (unless the breaches were remedied, or the terms of the loan were
renegotiated, on or before the end of the reporting period).
Items of income, expense, gains or losses
The entity shall disclose the following items of income, expense, gains or losses either in the statement of
comprehensive income or in the notes:
IFRS 7:20(a) (a) net gains or net losses on:
(i) financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss, showing separately those on financial assets
designated as such upon initial recognition, and those that are mandatorily measured at fair value in accordance
with IFRS 9;
(ii) – (iv) [deleted];
(v) financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, showing separately those on financial liabilities designated
as such upon initial recognition, and those on financial liabilities that meet the definition of held for trading in
IAS 39;
(vi) financial assets measured at amortised cost;
(vii) financial liabilities measured at amortised cost; and
(viii) financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
IFRS 7:20(b) b) total interest income and total interest expense (calculated using the effective interest method) for financial assets
that are measured at amortised cost or financial liabilities not at fair value through profit or loss;
IFRS 7:20(c) c) fee income and expense (other than amounts included in determining the effective interest rate) arising from:
(i) financial assets measured at amortised cost or financial liabilities that are not at fair value through profit or loss;
and
(ii) trust and other fiduciary activities that result in the holding or investing of assets on behalf of individuals, trusts,
retirement benefit plans, and other institutions;
IFRS 7:20(d) d) interest income on impaired financial assets accrued in accordance with paragraph AG93 of IAS 39; and
IFRS 7:20(e) e) the amount of any impairment loss for each class of financial asset.
IFRS 7:20A An entity shall disclose the following related to the gain or loss recognised in the statement of comprehensive income
arising from the derecognition of financial assets measured at amortised cost:
a) an analysis of the gain or loss, showing separately gains and losses arising from derecognition of those financial
assets; and
b) the reasons for derecognising those financial assets.
Note: IFRS 9, issued in November 2009, amended paragraph 20 and added paragraph 20A. The amendments should
be applied when the entity applies IFRS 9.
Other disclosures
Accounting policies
IFRS 7:21 In accordance with paragraph 117 of IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements an entity discloses, in the summary of
significant accounting policies, the measurement basis (or bases) used in preparing the financial statements and the
other accounting policies used that are relevant to an understanding of the financial statements.

IFRS 7:B5 Note:
Accounting policies that are relevant to the understanding of the financial statements include:
a) for financial liabilities designated as at fair value through profit or loss:
i) the nature of the financial liabilities the entity has designated as at fair value through profit or loss;
ii) the criteria for so designating such financial liabilities on initial recognition; and
iii) how the entity has satisfied the criteria in paragraphs 9, 11A and 12 of IAS 39 for such designation including,
where appropriate, a narrative description of the circumstances underlying the measurement or recognition
inconsistency that would otherwise arise, or how designation at fair value through profit or loss is consistent
with the entity’s documented risk management or investment strategy;
(aa)for financial assets designated as measured at fair value through profit or loss:
(i) the nature of the financial assets the entity has designated as measured at fair value through profit or loss;
(ii) how the entity has satisfied the criteria in paragraph 4.5 of IFRS 9 for such designation;.
b) [deleted]
c) whether regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are accounted for at trade date or at settlement date;
d) when an allowance account is used to reduce the carrying amount of financial assets impaired by credit losses
(see paragraph 16 above):
(i) the criteria for determining when the carrying amount of impaired financial assets is reduced directly (or, in the
case of a reversal of a write-down, is increased directly) and when the allowance account is used; and
(ii) the criteria for writing off amounts charged to the allowance account against the carrying amount of impaired
financial assets;
e) how net gains or net losses on each category of financial instruments are determined (see paragraph 20(a) above),
for example, whether the net gains or net losses on items at fair value through profit or loss include interest or
dividend income;
f) the criteria the entity uses to determine that there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has occurred (se
paragraph 20(c) above); and
g) when the terms of financial assets that would otherwise be past due or impaired have been renegotiated, the
accounting policy for financial assets that are the subject of renegotiated terms (see paragraph 36(d) below).
Paragraph 122 of IAS 1 also requires entities to disclose, in the summary of significant accounting policies or other
notes, the judgements, apart from those involving estimations, that management has made in the process of applying
the entity’s accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial
statements.
Note: IFRS 9, issues in November 2009, amended paragraph B5 of IFRS 7. The amendments should be applied when
Hedge accounting
The entity shall disclose the following separately for each type of hedge (i.e. fair value hedges, cash flow hedges, and
hedges of net investments in foreign operations):
IFRS 7:22(a) a) a description of each type of hedge;
IFRS 7:22(b) b) a description of the financial instruments designated as hedging instruments and their fair values at the end of the
IFRS 7:22(c) c) the nature of the risks being hedged.
For cash flow hedges, the entity shall disclose:
IFRS 7:23(a) a) the periods when the cash flows are expected to occur and when they are expected to affect profit or loss;
IFRS 7:23(b) b) a description of any forecast transaction for which hedge accounting had previously been used, but which is no
longer expected to occur;
42

IFRS 7:23(c) c) the amount that was recognised in other comprehensive income during the period;
IFRS 7:23(d) d) the amount that was reclassified from equity to profit or loss for the period, showing the amount included in each
line item in the statement of comprehensive income; and
IFRS 7:23(e) e) the amount that was removed from equity during the period and included in the initial cost or other carrying
amount of a non-financial asset or non-financial liability whose acquisition or incurrence was a hedged highly
probable forecast transaction.
The entity shall disclose separately:
IFRS 7:24(a) a) in fair value hedges, gains or losses:
i) on the hedging instrument; and
ii) on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk;
IFRS 7:24(b) b) in cash flow hedges, the ineffectiveness recognised in profit or loss;
IFRS 7:24(c) c) for hedges of net investments in foreign operations, the ineffectiveness recognised in profit or loss.
Fair value
IFRS 7:25 Except as set out in paragraph 29 of IFRS 7 (see below), for each class of financial assets and financial liabilities, the
entity shall disclose the fair value of that class of assets and liabilities in a way that permits it to be compared with its
carrying amount.
IFRS 7:26 Note: In disclosing fair values, the entity shall group financial assets and financial liabilities into classes, but shall
offset them only to the extent that their carrying amounts are offset in the statement of financial position.
IFRS 7:27 The entity shall disclose for each class of financial instruments the methods and, when a valuation technique is used, the
assumptions applied in determining fair values of each class of financial assets or financial liabilities.
Note: For example, if applicable, an entity discloses information about the assumptions relating to prepayment rates,
rates of estimated credit losses and interest or discount rates.
IFRS 7:27 If there has been a change in valuation technique, the entity shall disclose that change and the reason for making it.
IFRS 7:27B For fair value measurements recognised in the statement of financial position an entity shall disclose for each class of
financial instruments:
IFRS 7:27B Note: The entity shall present the quantitative disclosures required by paragraph 27B of IFRS 7 (see below) in tabular
format unless another format is more appropriate.
IFRS 7:27B(a) a) the level in the fair value hierarchy into which the fair value measurements are categorised in their entirety,
segregating fair value measurements in accordance with the levels defined in paragraph 27A (see above);
IFRS 7:27B(b) b) any significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for those transfers,
separately for:
i) transfers into each level; and
ii) transfers out of each level.
Note: For the purpose of disclosing transfers into and out of each level, significance shall be judged with respect to
profit or loss, and total assets or total liabilities.
IFRS 7:27B(c) c) for fair value measurements in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, a reconciliation from the beginning balances to the
ending balances, disclosing separately changes during the period attributable to the following:
i) total gains or losses for the period recognised in profit or loss, and a description of where they are presented in
the statement of comprehensive income or the separate income statement (if presented);
ii) total gains or losses recognised in other comprehensive income;

iii) purchases, sales, issues and settlements (each type of movement disclosed separately); and
iv) transfers into or out of Level 3 (e.g. transfers attributable to changes in the observability of market data) and
the reasons for those transfers. For significant transfers, transfers into Level 3 shall be disclosed and discussed
separately from transfers out of Level 3;
IFRS 7:27B(d) d) the amount of total gains or losses for the period in (c)(i) above included in profit or loss that are attributable to
gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities held at the end of the reporting period and a description of
where those gains or losses are presented in the statement of comprehensive income or the separate income
statement (if presented); and
IFRS 7:27B(e) e) for fair value measurements in Level 3, if changing one or more of the inputs to reasonably possible alternative
assumptions would change fair value significantly, the entity shall:
i) state that fact;
ii) disclose the effect of those changes; and
iii) disclose how the effect of a change to a reasonably possible alternative assumption was calculated.
Note: For the purpose of the disclosures according to paragraph 27B(e) of IFRS 7, significance shall be judged with
respect to profit or loss, and total assets or total liabilities, or, when changes in fair value are recognised in
other comprehensive income, total equity.
IFRS 7:27A Notes:
1) To make the disclosures required by paragraph 27B (see below), an entity shall classify fair value measurements
using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. The fair
value hierarchy shall have the following levels:
a) quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1);
b) inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices) (Level 2); and
c) inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs) (Level 3).
2. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety shall be
determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
For this purpose, the significance of an input is assessed against the fair value measurement in its entirety. If a fair
value measurement uses observable inputs that require significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, that
measurement is a level 3 measurement. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgement, considering factors specific to the asset or liability.
IFRS 7:44G 3. Paragraph 27 was amended and paragraphs 27A and 27B were added by Improving Disclosures about Financial
Instruments (Amendments to IFRS 7), issued in March 2009 and effective for annual periods beginning on or after
1 January 2009 (with earlier application permitted)). An entity need not provide the disclosures required by the
amendments for any statement of financial position as at the beginning of the earliest comparative period as at a
date before 31 December 2009.
IFRS 7:28 When the market for a financial instrument is not active, if a difference exists between the fair value at initial recognition
and the amount that would be determined at that date using a valuation technique (see note below), the entity shall
disclose, by class of financial instrument:
IFRS 7:28(a) a) its accounting policy for recognising that difference in profit or loss to reflect a change in factors (including time)
that market participants would consider in setting a price (see paragraph AG76A of IAS 39); and
IFRS 7:28(b) b) the aggregate difference yet to be recognised in profit or loss at the beginning and end of the period together with
a reconciliation of changes in the balance of this difference.
IFRS 7:28 Note: If the market for a financial instrument is not active, an entity establishes its fair value using a valuation technique
(see paragraphs AG74-AG79 of IAS 39). Nevertheless, the best evidence of fair value at initial recognition is the
transaction price (i.e. the fair value of the consideration given or received), unless the fair value of the instrument
concerned is evidenced by comparison with other observable current market transactions in the same instrument
(i.e. without modification or repackaging) or based on a valuation technique whose variables included only data
from observable markets. It follows that there could be a difference between the fair value at initial recognition
and the amount that would be determined at that date using the valuation technique.
44

IFRS 7:29(c) Disclosures of fair value are not required:
IFRS 7:29(a) a) when the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value (e.g. for financial instruments such as short-
term trade receivables and payables);
IFRS 7:29(b) b) for derivatives linked to investments in equity instruments that do not have a quoted market price in an active
market that are measured at cost in accordance with IAS 39 because their fair value cannot be measured reliably; or
IFRS 7:29(c) c) for a contract containing a discretionary participation feature (as described in IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts) if the fair
value of that feature cannot be measured reliably.
IFRS 7:30 In the cases described in paragraphs 29(b) and (c) of IFRS 7 (see above), the entity shall disclose information to help
users of the financial statements make their own judgements about the extent of possible differences between the
carrying amount of those contracts and their fair value, including:
Note: IFRS 9, issues in November 2009, amended paragraph 30 of IFRS 7. The amendments should be applied when
IFRS 7:30(a) a) the fact that fair value information has not been disclosed for these instruments because their fair value cannot be
measured reliably;
IFRS 7:30(b) b) a description of the financial instruments, their carrying amount, and an explanation of why fair value cannot be
measured reliably;
IFRS 7:30(c) c) information about the market for the instruments;
IFRS 7:30(d) d) information about whether and how the entity intends to dispose of the financial instruments; and
IFRS 7:30(e) e) if financial instruments whose fair value previously could not be reliably measured are derecognised, that fact, their
carrying amount at the time of derecognition, and the amount of gain or loss recognised.
Nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments
IFRS 7:31 The entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate the nature and extent of
risks arising from financial instruments to which the entity is exposed at the end of the reporting period.
Notes:
IFRS 7:32 1) The financial instrument risk disclosures required by paragraphs 33 to 42 of IFRS 7 (see below) focus on the risks
that arise from financial instruments and how they have been managed. These risks typically include, but are not
limited to, credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk.
IFRS 7:32A 2) Providing qualitative disclosures in the context of quantitative disclosures enables users to link related disclosures
and hence form an overall picture of the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments. The
interaction between qualitative and quantitative disclosures contributes to disclosure of information in a way that
better enables users to evaluate an entity’s exposure to risks.
IFRS 7:B6 3) The financial risk disclosures required by paragraphs 31 to 42 of IFRS 7 (see above and below) should be given
either in the financial statements or incorporated by cross-reference from the financial statements to some other
statement, such as a management commentary or risk report that is available to users of the financial statements
on the same terms as the financial statements and at the same time. Without the information incorporated by
cross-reference, the financial statements are incomplete.
Note: Paragraph 32A was added by Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010. An entity shall apply those
Qualitative disclosures
IFRS 7:33(a) a) the exposures to that risk and how they arise;
IFRS 7:33(b) b) its objectives, policies and processes for managing the risk and the methods used to measure the risk; and

IFRS 7:33(c) c) any changes in 33(a) or (b) (see above) from the previous period.
Quantitative disclosures
IFRS 7:34(a) a) summary quantitative data about its exposure to that risk at the end of the reporting period. This disclosure shall be
based on the information provided internally to key management personnel of the entity (as defined in IAS 24
Related Party Disclosures) (e.g. the entity’s board of directors or chief executive officer);
IFRS 7:B7 Note: When an entity uses several methods to manage a risk exposure, the method or methods that provide the most
relevant and reliable information should be disclosed. IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting
Estimates and Errors discusses relevance and reliability.
IFRS 7:34(b) b) the disclosures required by paragraphs 36 to 42 of IFRS 7 (see below), to the extent not provided in paragraph 34(a)
(see above), unless the risk is not material; and
IFRS 7:34(b) Note: See paragraphs 29 to 31 of IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements for a discussion of materiality.
IFRS 7:34(b) b) the disclosures required by paragraphs 36 to 42 of IFRS 7 (see below), to the extent not provided in accordance with
34(a) (see above);
IFRS 7:34(c) c) concentrations of risk if not apparent from 34(a) and (b) (see above);
IFRS 7:34(c) c) concentrations of risk if not apparent from the disclosures made in accordance with 34(a) and (b) (see above).
Note: Paragraphs 34(b) and 34(c) was amended by Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010. An entity shall apply
those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. Earlier application is permitted.
Disclosures of concentrations of risk shall include:
IFRS 7:B8(a) a) a description of how management determines concentrations;
IFRS 7:B8(b) b) a description of the shared characteristics that identifies each concentration (e.g. counterparty, geographical area,
currency or market); and
IFRS 7:B8(c) c) the amount of the risk exposure associated with all financial instruments sharing that characteristic.
IFRS 7:B8 Note: Concentrations of risk arise from financial instruments that have similar characteristics and are affected
similarly by changes in economic or other conditions. The identification of concentrations of risk requires
judgement taking into account the circumstances of the entity.
IFRS 7:35 If the quantitative data disclosed as at the end of the reporting period are unrepresentative of an entity’s exposure to risk
during the period, the entity shall provide further information that is representative.
Credit risk
offset in accordance with IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation) (see also IFRS 7:B9 and B10);
IFRS 7:36(b) b) in respect of the amount disclosed in 36(a) (see above), a description of collateral held as security and other credit
enhancements;
IFRS 7:36(c) c) information about the credit quality of financial assets that are neither past due nor impaired; and
IFRS 7:36(d) d) the carrying amount of financial assets that would otherwise be past due or impaired whose terms have been
renegotiated.
46

offset in accordance with IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation) (see also IFRS 7:B9 and B10 below);
Note: This disclosure is not required for financial instruments whose carrying amount best represents the maximum
exposure to credit risk.
IFRS 7:36(b) b) a description of collateral held as security and of other credit enhancements, and their financial effect (e.g. a
quantification of the extent to which collateral and other credit enhancements mitigate credit risk) in respect of the
amount that best represents the maximum exposure to credit risk (whether disclosed in accordance with IFRS 7:36(a)
(see above) or represented by the carrying amount of a financial instrument);
IFRS 7:36(c) c) information about the credit quality of financial assets that are neither past due nor impaired;
d) [deleted];
Notes:
IFRS 7:B9 1) For a financial asset, the entity’s maximum exposure to credit risk is typically the gross carrying amount net of any
amounts offset in accordance with IAS 32 and any impairment losses recognised in accordance with IAS 39.
IFRS 7:B10 2) Activities that give rise to credit risk include, but are not limited to, granting loans, placing deposits, granting
financial guarantees, making irrevocable loan commitments and entering into derivative contracts. Further
guidance for determining the maximum credit exposure in each of these instances is included in IFRS 7:B10.
including the factors the entity considered in determining that they are impaired; and
IFRS 7:37(c) c) for the amounts disclosed in 37(a) and (b) (see above), a description of collateral held by the entity as security and
other credit enhancements and, unless impracticable, an estimate of their fair value.
and
including the factors the entity considered in determining that they are impaired.
IFRS 7:37(c) c) [deleted]
IFRSs, the entity shall disclose:
IFRS 7:38(a) a) the nature and carrying amount of the assets obtained; and
operations.

IFRSs, the entity shall disclose for such assets held at the reporting date:
IFRS 7:38(a) a) the nature and carrying amount of the assets; and
operations.
Liquidity risk
IFRS 7:39(a) a) a maturity analysis for non-derivative financial liabilities (including issued financial guarantee contracts) that shows
the remaining contractual maturities;
IFRS 7:39(b) b) a maturity analysis for derivative financial liabilities. The maturity analysis shall include the remaining contractual
maturities for those derivative financial liabilities for which contractual maturities are essential for an understanding
of the timing of the cash flows (see paragraph B11B);
IFRS 7:39(c) c) a description of how it manages the liquidity risk inherent in 39(a) and 39(b) (see above).
IFRS 7:B10A The entity shall explain how the summary quantitative data about its exposure to liquidity risk are determined.
IFRS 7:B10A If the outflows of cash (or another financial asset) included in those data could either:
a) occur significantly earlier than indicated in the data, or
b) be for significantly different amounts from those indicated in the data (e.g. for a derivative that is not included in the
data on a net settlement basis but for which the counterparty has the option to require gross settlement),
the entity shall state that fact and provide quantitative information that enables users of its financial statements to
evaluate the extent of this risk unless that information is included in the contractual maturity analyses required by
paragraph 39(a) or (b).
Notes:
IFRS 7:B10A 1) In accordance with paragraph 34(a), an entity discloses summary quantitative data about its exposure to liquidity
risk on the basis of the information provided internally to key management personnel.
IFRS 7:B11 2) When preparing a maturity analysis required by paragraph 39(a) and (b) of IFRS 7 an entity must use its judgement
to determine an appropriate number of time bands.
For example, an entity might determine that the following time bands are appropriate:
a) not later than one month
b) later than one month and not later than three months
c) later than three months and not later than one year; and
d) later than one year and not later than five years.
IFRS 7:B11A 3) When preparing a maturity analysis required by paragraph 39(a) and (b) of IFRS 7, an entity does not separate an
embedded derivative from a hybrid (combined) financial instrument. For such an instrument, an entity is required to
apply the requirements of paragraph 39(a).
IFRS 7:B11B 4) Disclosure of a quantitative maturity analysis for derivative financial liabilities (see paragraph 39(b) above) that
shows remaining contractual maturities is required if the contractual maturities are essential for an understanding
of the timing of the cash flows. For example, this would be the case for:
a) an interest rate swap with a remaining maturity of five years in a cash flow hedge of a variable rate financial
asset or liability.
b) all loan commitments.
48

IFRS 7:B11C 5) In the disclosure of maturity analyses for financial liabilities that show the remaining contractual maturities for
some financial liabilities:
a) when a counterparty has a choice of when an amount is paid, the liability is allocated to the earliest period in
which the entity can be required to pay. For example, financial liabilities that an entity can be required to repay
on demand (e.g. demand deposits) are included in the earliest time band.
b) when an entity is committed to make amounts available in instalments, each instalment is allocated to the
earliest period in which the entity can be required to pay. For example, an undrawn loan commitment is
included in the time band containing the earliest date it can be drawn down.
c) for issued financial guarantee contracts the maximum amount of the guarantee is allocated to the earliest
period in which the guarantee could be called.
IFRS 7:B11D 6) The contractual amounts disclosed in the maturity analyses as required by paragraph 39(a) and (b) are the
contractual undiscounted cash flows.
For example:
a) gross finance lease obligations (before deducting finance charge);
b) prices specified in forward agreements to purchase financial assets for cash;
c) net amounts for pay-floating/receive-fixed interest rate swaps for which net cash flows are exchanged;
d) contractual amounts to be exchanged in a derivative financial instrument (e.g. a currency swap) for which
gross cash flows are exchanged; and
e) gross loan commitments.
Such undiscounted cash flows differ from the amount included in the statement of financial position because the
amount in that statement is based on discounted cash flows. When the amount payable is not fixed, the amount
disclosed is determined by reference to the conditions existing at the end of the reporting period. For example, when
the amount payable varies with changes in an index, the amount disclosed may be based on the level of the index at
the end of the period.
IFRS 7:B11E In describing how an entity manages the liquidity risk inherent in the items disclosed in the quantitative disclosures required
in paragraph 39(a) and 39(b) of IFRS 7 (as required by paragraph 39(c) of IFRS 7), an entity shall disclose a maturity analysis
of financial assets it holds for managing liquidity risk (e.g. financial assets that are readily saleable or expected to generate
cash inflows to meet cash outflows on financial liabilities), if that information is necessary to enable users of its financial
statements to evaluate the nature and extent of liquidity risk.
IFRS 7:B11F Other factors that an entity might consider in providing the disclosure required in paragraph 39(c) include, but are not
limited to, whether the entity:
a) has committed borrowing facilities (e.g. commercial paper facilities) or other lines of credit (e.g. stand-by credit
facilities) that it can access to meet liquidity needs;
b) holds deposits at central banks to meet liquidity needs;
c) has very diverse funding sources;
d) has significant concentrations of liquidity risk in either its assets or its funding sources;
e) has internal control processes and contingency plans for managing liquidity risk;
f) has instruments that include accelerated repayment terms (e.g. on the downgrade of the entity’s credit rating);
g) has instruments that could require the posting of collateral (e.g. margin calls for derivatives);
h) has instruments that allow the entity to choose whether it settles its financial liabilities by delivering cash (or another
financial asset) or by delivering its own shares; or
i) has instruments that are subject to master netting agreements.

Market risk
Unless the entity complies with paragraph 41 of IFRS 7 (see below), it shall disclose:
IFRS 7:40(a) a) a sensitivity analysis for each type of market risk to which the entity is exposed at the end of the reporting period,
showing how profit or loss and equity would have been affected by changes in the relevant risk variable that were
reasonably possible at that date;
IFRS 7:40(b) b) the methods and assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analysis; and
IFRS 7:40(c) c) changes from the previous period in the methods and assumptions used, and the reasons for such changes.
IFRS 7:B17 to B28 Notes:
1) An entity decides how it aggregates information to display the overall picture without combining information with
different characteristics about exposures to risks from significantly different economic environments. If an entity has
exposure to only one type of market risk in only one economic environment, it would not show disaggregated
information.
2) An entity is not required to determine what the profit or loss for the period would have been if the relevant risk
variable had been different. Instead, an entity discloses the effect on profit or loss and equity at the end of the
reporting period assuming that a reasonably possible change in the relevant risk variable had occurred at the end
of the reporting period and had been applied to the risk exposures in existence at that date. In determining this
effect, the entity should consider the economic environment in which it operates. A ‘reasonably possible change’
should not include remote or ‘worst case’ scenarios or ‘stress tests’.
3) The sensitivity analysis should show the effects of changes that are considered to be reasonably possible over the
period until the end of the next reporting period.
4) An entity is not required to disclose the effect on profit or loss and equity for each change within a range of
reasonably possible changes of the relevant risk variable. Disclosure of the effects of the changes at the limits of the
reasonably possible range would be sufficient.
5) An entity shall provide sensitivity analyses for the whole of its business, but may provide different types of sensitivity
analysis for different classes of financial instruments. For example, a sensitivity analysis would be disclosed for each
currency to which an entity has significant exposure.
6) Interest rate risk arises on interest-bearing financial instruments recognised in the statement of financial position
(e.g. debt instruments acquired or issued) and on some financial instruments not recognised in the statement of
financial position (e.g. some loan commitments).
7) Currency risk arises on financial instruments that are denominated in a foreign currency, i.e. in a currency other than
the functional currency in which they are measured (see IAS 21 for definition of functional currency).Currency risk
does not arise from financial instruments that are non-monetary items or from financial instruments denominated in
the functional currency.
8) A sensitivity analysis is disclosed for each currency to which an entity has significant exposure. Other price risk
arises on financial instruments because of changes in, for example, commodity prices or equity prices. An entity
might disclose the effect of a decrease in a specified stock market index, commodity price, or other risk variable.
For example, if an entity gives residual value guarantees that are financial instruments, the entity discloses an
increase or decrease in the value of the assets to which the guarantee applies.
9) No sensitivity analysis is required for financial instruments that an entity classifies as its own equity instruments, nor
for non-monetary items.
10) Separate analysis is disclosed for:
a) sensitivity of profit or loss that arises, for example, from instruments measured at fair value through profit or
loss: and
b) sensitivity of other comprehensive income that arises, for example, from investments in equity instruments
whose changes in fair value are presented in other comprehensive income.
IFRS 7:41 If the entity prepares a sensitivity analysis, such as value-at-risk, that reflects interdependencies between risk variables
(e.g. interest rates and exchange rates) and uses it to manage financial risks, it may use that sensitivity analysis in place
of the analysis specified in paragraph 40 of IFRS 7 (see above).
IFRS 7:B20 Note: This applies even if such a methodology measures only the potential for loss and does not measure the
potential for gain.
50

In the circumstances described in paragraph 41 of IFRS 7 (see above), the entity shall also disclose:
IFRS 7:41(a) a) an explanation of the method used in preparing such a sensitivity analysis, and of the main parameters and
assumptions underlying the data provided; and
IFRS 7:B20 Notes:
1) An entity may comply with paragraph 41(a) of IFRS 7 by disclosing the type of value-at-risk model used (for
example whether the model relies on Monte Carlo simulations), an explanation about how the model works and
the main assumptions (for example the holding period and confidence level).
2) An entity may also disclose the historical observation period and weightings applied to observations within that
period, an explanation of how options are dealt with in the calculations, and which volatilities and correlations (or,
alternatively, Monte Carlo probability distribution simulations) are used.
IFRS 7:41(b) b) an explanation of the objective of the method used and of limitations that may result in the information not fully
reflecting the fair value of the assets and liabilities involved.
IFRS 7:42 When the sensitivity analyses disclosed in accordance with paragraphs 40 or 41 of IFRS 7 (see above) are
unrepresentative of a risk inherent in a financial instrument (for example, because the year-end exposure does not reflect
the exposure during the year), the entity shall disclose that fact and the reason it believes the sensitivity analyses are
unrepresentative.
Transition to IFRS 9
IFRS 7:44I When an entity first applies IFRS 9, it shall disclose for each class of financial assets at the date of initial application:
a) the original measurement category and carrying amount determined in accordance with IAS 39;
b) the new measurement category and carrying amount determined in accordance with IFRS 9;
c) the amount of any financial assets in the statement of financial position that were previously designated as
measured at fair value through profit or loss but are no longer so designated, distinguishing between those that
IFRS requires an entity to reclassify and those that an entity elects to reclassify.
An entity shall present these quantitative disclosures in tabular format unless another format is more appropriate.
IFRS 7:44J When an entity first applies IFRS 9, it shall disclose qualitative information to enable users to understand:
a) how it applied the classification requirements in IFRS 9 to those financial assets whose classification has changed as
a result of applying IFRS 9.
b) the reasons for any designation or de-designation of financial assets or financial liabilities as measured at fair value
through profit or loss.
IFRS 7.44L If the entity has applied paragraph 32A and amended paragraphs 34 and 36-38 arising from Improvements to IFRSs
issued in May 2010 before 1 January 2011 it shall disclose that fact.

This section of the checklist addresses IFRS 8, which requires certain entities to report information regarding the nature
and financial effects of their various operating segments.
IFRS 8 applies to the separate or individual financial statements of an entity (and to the consolidated financial
statements of a group with a parent):
• whose debt or equity instruments are traded in a public market; or
• that files, or is in the process of filing, its (consolidated) financial statements with a securities commission or other
regulatory organisation for the purpose of issuing any class of instruments in a public market.
However, when both separate and consolidated financial statements for the parent are presented in a single financial
report, segment information is only required on the basis of the consolidated financial statements.
If an entity that is not required to apply IFRS 8 chooses to disclose information about segments that does not comply
with the Standard, the information should not be described as segment information.
The Implementation Guidance accompanying IFRS 8 provides examples to illustrate the segment disclosures required by
the Standard.
• new paragraph 23 (added by Improvements to IFRSs – issued in April 2009 and effective for annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2010).
At 30 September 2010, the following revised Standard (issued but not yet effective) adds new paragraphs to IFRS 8 or
amends existing paragraphs in IFRS 8:
• IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures (issued November 2009) amends paragraph 34 of IFRS 8. The amendment is
applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011, with earlier application permitted.
Core principle
IFRS 8:1 An entity shall disclose information to enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects
of the types of business activities in which it engages and the economic environments in which it operates.
Reportable segments
IFRS 8:11 An entity shall report separately information about each operating segment that:
a) has been identified in accordance with paragraphs 5 to 10 of IFRS 8, or results from aggregating two or more of
those segments in accordance with paragraph 12 of IFRS 8 (see below); and
b) exceeds the quantitative thresholds in paragraph 13 of IFRS 8 (see below).
IFRS 8:5 Notes:
1) An operating segment is a component of an entity:
• that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses (including revenues and
expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same entity);
• whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the entity’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions
about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance; and
• for which discrete financial information is available.
See paragraphs 5 to 10 of IFRS 8 for a discussion of the terms used in this definition.
IFRS 8:19 2) IFRS 8 acknowledges that there may be a practical limit to the number of reportable segments that an entity separately
discloses beyond which segment information may become too detailed. Although no precise limit has been determined,
as the number of segments that are reportable in accordance with paragraphs 13 to 18 of IFRS 8 (see below) increases
above ten, the Standard suggests that the entity should consider whether a practical limit has been reached.
52
IFRS 8 Operating Segments

Aggregation criteria
IFRS 8:12 Two or more operating segments may be aggregated into a single operating segment if:
a) aggregation is consistent with the core principle of IFRS 8 (see above);
b) the segments have similar economic characteristics; and
c) the segments are similar in each of the following respects:
i) the nature of the products and services;
ii) the nature of the production processes;
iii) the type or class of customer for their products and services;
iv) the methods used to distribute their products or provide their services; and
v) if applicable, the nature of the regulatory environment (e.g. banking, insurance, or public utilities).
Quantitative thresholds
An entity shall report separately information about an operating segment that meets any of the following quantitative
thresholds:
IFRS 8:13(a) a) its reported revenue, including both sales to external customers and intersegment sales or transfers, is 10 per cent or
more of the combined revenue, internal and external, of all operating segments; or
IFRS 8:13(b) b) the absolute amount of its reported profit or loss is 10 per cent or more of the greater, in absolute amount, of (i) the
combined reported profit of all operating segments that did not report a loss and (ii) the combined reported loss of
all operating segments that reported a loss; or
IFRS 8:13(c) c) its assets are 10 per cent or more of the combined assets of all operating segments.
IFRS 8:13 Note: Operating segments that do not meet any of the quantitative thresholds outlined above may be considered
reportable, and separately disclosed, if management believes that information about the segment would be
useful to users of the financial statements.
IFRS 8:14 An entity may combine information about operating segments that do not meet the quantitative thresholds with
information about other operating segments that do not meet the quantitative thresholds to produce a reportable
segment only if the operating segments have similar economic characteristics and share a majority of the aggregation
criteria listed in paragraph 12 of IFRS 8 (see above).
IFRS 8:15 If the total external revenue reported by operating segments constitutes less than 75 per cent of the entity’s revenue,
additional operating segments shall be identified as reportable segments (even if they do not meet the criteria in
paragraph 13 of IFRS 8 as set out above) until at least 75 per cent of the entity’s revenue is included in reportable
segments.
IFRS 8:16 Information about other business activities and operating segments that are not reportable shall be combined and
disclosed in an ‘all other segments’ category separately from other reconciling items in the reconciliations required by
paragraph 28 of IFRS 8 (see below).
IFRS 8:16 The sources of the revenue included in the ‘all other segments’ category shall be described.
IFRS 8:17 If management judges that an operating segment identified as a reportable segment in the immediately preceding
period is of continuing significance, information about that segment shall continue to be reported separately in the
current period even if it no longer meets the criteria for reportability in paragraph 13 of IFRS 8 (see above).
IFRS 8:18 If an operating segment is identified as a reportable segment in the current period in accordance with the quantitative
thresholds, segment data for a prior period presented for comparative purposes shall be restated to reflect the newly
reportable segment as a separate segment, even if that segment did not satisfy the criteria for reportability in paragraph 13
of IFRS 8 (see above) in the prior period.
IFRS 8:18 Note: Prior period segment information need not be restated if the necessary information is not available and the
cost to develop it would be excessive.

Disclosure
IFRS 8:20 An entity shall disclose information to enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects
of the business activities in which it engages and the economic environments in which it operates.
IFRS 8:21 Notes:
1) To give effect to the principle in paragraph 20 of IFRS 8 (see above), an entity shall disclose the following for each
period for which a statement of comprehensive income is presented:
• general information as described in paragraph 22 of IFRS 8 (see below);
• information about reported segment profit or loss, including specified revenues and expenses included in
reported segment profit or loss, segment assets, segment liabilities and the basis of measurement, as described
in paragraphs 23 to 27 of IFRS 8 (see below); and
• reconciliations of the totals of segment revenues, reported segment profit or loss, segment assets, segment
liabilities, and other material segment items to corresponding entity amounts as described in paragraph 28 of
IFRS 8 (see below).
2) Reconciliations of the amounts in the statement of financial position for reportable segments to the amounts in the
entity’s statement of financial position are required for each date at which a statement of financial position is
presented. Information for prior periods shall be restated as described in paragraphs 29 and 30 of IFRS 8 (see below).
General information
An entity shall disclose the following general information:
IFRS 8:22(a) a) factors used to identify the entity’s reportable segments, including the basis of organisation; and
Note: For example, whether management has chosen to organise the entity around differences in products and
services, geographical areas, regulatory environments, or a combination of factors and whether operating
segments have been aggregated.
IFRS 8:22(b) b) types of products and services from which each reportable segment derives its revenues.
Information about profit or loss, assets and liabilities
IFRS 8:23 For each reportable segment, an entity shall report a measure of profit or loss.
IFRS 8:23 An entity shall report a measure of total assets and liabilities for each reportable segment if such amounts are regularly
provided to the chief operating decision maker.
An entity shall also disclose the following about each reportable segment if the specified amounts are included in the
measure of segment profit or loss reviewed by the chief operating decision maker or are otherwise regularly provided to
the chief operating decision maker, even if not included in that measure of segment profit or loss:
IFRS 8:23(a) a) revenues from external customers;
IFRS 8:23(b) b) revenues from transactions with other operating segments of the same entity;
IFRS 8:23(c) c) interest revenue;
IFRS 8:23(d) d) interest expense;
IFRS 8:23(e) e) depreciation and amortisation;
IFRS 8:23(f) f) material items of income and expense disclosed in accordance with paragraph 97 of IAS 1;
IFRS 8:23(g) g) the entity’s interest in the profit or loss of associates and joint ventures accounted for by the equity method;
IFRS 8:23(h) h) income tax expense or income; and
IFRS 8:23(i) i) material non-cash items other than depreciation and amortisation.
IFRS 8:23 An entity shall report interest revenue separately from interest expense for each reportable segment unless a majority of
the segment’s revenues are from interest and the chief operating decision maker relies primarily on net interest revenue
to assess the performance of the segment and make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment.
54

Note: Where a majority of the segment’s revenues are from interest and the chief operating decision maker relies
primarily on net interest revenue to assess the performance of the segment and make decisions about
resources to be allocated to the segment, an entity may report that segment’s interest revenue net of its interest
expense.
IFRS 8:23 Where a majority of the segment’s revenues are from interest and the chief operating decision maker relies primarily on
net interest revenue to assess the performance of the segment and make decisions about resources to be allocated to
the segment, an entity that reports that segment’s interest revenue net of its interest expense shall disclose the fact that
it has done so.
An entity shall disclose the following about each reportable segment if the specified amounts are included in the
measure of segment assets reviewed by the chief operating decision maker or are otherwise regularly provided to the
chief operating decision maker, even if not included in the measure of segment assets:
IFRS 8:24(a) a) the amount of investment in associates and joint ventures accounted for by the equity method; and
IFRS 8:24(b) b) the amounts of additions to non-current assets other than financial instruments, deferred tax assets, post-
employment benefit assets (see IAS 19 Employee Benefits paragraphs 54 to 58) and rights arising under insurance
contracts.
Note: For assets classified according to a liquidity presentation, non-current assets are assets that include
amounts expected to be recovered more than twelve months after the reporting period.
Measurement
IFRS 8:25 The amount of each segment item reported shall be the measure reported to the chief operating decision maker for the
purposes of making decisions about allocating resources to the segment and assessing its performance.
IFRS 8:25 Adjustments and eliminations made in preparing an entity’s financial statements and allocations of revenues, expenses,
and gains or losses shall be included in determining reported segment profit or loss only if they are included in the
measure of the segment’s profit or loss that is used by the chief operating decision maker.
IFRS 8:25 Similarly, only those assets and liabilities that are included in the measures of the segment’s assets and segment’s
liabilities that are used by the chief operating decision maker shall be reported for that segment.
IFRS 8:25 If amounts are allocated to reported segment profit or loss, assets or liabilities, those amounts shall be allocated on a
reasonable basis.
IFRS 8:26 If the chief operating decision maker uses only one measure of an operating segment’s profit or loss, the segment’s
assets or the segment’s liabilities in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources, segment
profit or loss, assets and liabilities shall be reported at those measures.
IFRS 8:26 If the chief operating decision maker uses more than one measure of an operating segment’s profit or loss, the
segment’s assets or the segment’s liabilities, the reported measures shall be those that management believes are
determined in accordance with the measurement principles most consistent with those used in measuring the
corresponding amounts in the entity’s financial statements.
IFRS 8:27 An entity shall provide an explanation of the measurements of segment profit or loss, segment assets and segment
liabilities for each reportable segment.
At a minimum, an entity shall disclose the following:
IFRS 8:27(a) a) the basis of accounting for any transactions between reportable segments;
IFRS 8:27(b) b) the nature of any differences between the measurements of the reportable segments’ profits or losses and the
entity’s profit or loss before income tax expense or income and discontinued operations (if not apparent from the
reconciliations described in paragraph 28 of IFRS 8 – see below);
Note: Those differences could include accounting policies and policies for allocation of centrally incurred costs
that are necessary for an understanding of the reported segment information.
IFRS 8:27(c) c) the nature of any differences between the measurements of the reportable segments’ assets and the entity’s assets
(if not apparent from the reconciliations described in paragraph 28 of IFRS 8 – see below);

Note: Those differences could include accounting policies and policies for allocation of jointly used assets that are
necessary for an understanding of the reported segment information.
IFRS 8:27(d) d) the nature of any differences between the measurements of the reportable segments’ liabilities and the entity’s
liabilities (if not apparent from the reconciliations described in paragraph 28 of IFRS 8 – see below);
Note: Those differences could include accounting policies and policies for allocation of jointly utilised liabilities
that are necessary for an understanding of the reported segment information.
IFRS 8:27(e) e) the nature of any changes from prior periods in the measurement methods used to determine reported segment
profit or loss and the effect, if any, of those changes on the measure of segment profit or loss; and
IFRS 8:27(f) f) the nature and effect of any asymmetrical allocations to reportable segments.
Note: For example, an entity might allocate depreciation expense to a segment without allocating the related
depreciable assets to that segment.
Reconciliations
IFRS 8:21 Note: Reconciliations of the amounts in the statement of financial position for reportable segments to the amounts in
the entity's statement of financial position are required for each date at which a statement of financial position
is presented. Information for prior periods shall be restated as described in paragraphs 29 and 30 of IFRS 8
(see below).
An entity shall provide reconciliations of all of the following:
IFRS 8:28(a) a) the total of the reportable segments’ revenues to the entity’s revenue;
IFRS 8:28(b) b) the total of the reportable segments’ measures of profit or loss to the entity’s profit or loss before tax expense (tax
income) and discontinued operations;
Note: However, if an entity allocates to reportable segments items such as tax expense (tax income), the entity may
reconcile the total of the segments’ measures of profit or loss to the entity’s profit or loss after those items.
IFRS 8:28(c) c) the total of the reportable segments’ assets to the entity’s assets;
IFRS 8:28(d) d) the total of the reportable segments’ liabilities to the entity’s liabilities if segment liabilities are reported in
accordance with paragraph 23 of IFRS 8 (see above); and
IFRS 8:28(e) e) the total of the reportable segments’ amounts for every other material item of information disclosed to the
corresponding amount for the entity.
IFRS 8:28 All material reconciling items shall be separately identified and described.
IFRS 8.28 Note: For example, the amount of each material adjustment needed to reconcile reportable segment profit or loss to
the entity’s profit or loss arising from different accounting policies shall be separately identified and described.
Restatement of previously reported information
IFRS 8:29 If an entity changes the structure of its internal organisation in a manner that causes the composition of its reportable
segments to change, the corresponding information for earlier periods, including interim periods, shall be restated unless
the information is not available and the cost to develop it would be excessive.
IFRS 8:29 Note: The determination of whether the information is not available and the cost to develop it would be excessive
shall be made for each individual item of disclosure.
IFRS 8:29 Following a change in the composition of its reportable segments, an entity shall disclose whether it has restated the
corresponding items of segment information for earlier periods.
56

IFRS 8:30 If an entity has changed the structure of its internal organisation in a manner that causes the composition of its
reportable segments to change and if segment information for earlier periods, including interim periods, is not restated
to reflect the change, the entity shall disclose in the year in which the change occurs segment information for the
current period on both the old basis and the new basis of segmentation.
IFRS 8:30 Note: The disclosures set out in paragraph 30 of IFRS 8 (see above) are not required where the necessary information
is not available and the cost to develop it would be excessive.
Entity-wide disclosures
IFRS 8:31 Note: Paragraphs 32 to 34 of IFRS 8 (see below) apply to all entities subject to that Standard, including those entities
that have a single reportable segment. Some entities’ business activities are not organised on the basis of
differences in related products and services or differences in geographical areas of operations. Such an entity’s
reportable segments may report revenues from a broad range of essentially different products and services, or
more than one of its reportable segments may provide essentially the same products and services. Similarly, an
entity’s reportable segments may hold assets in different geographical areas and report revenues from
customers in different geographical areas, or more than one of its reportable segments may operate in the
same geographical area. Information required by paragraphs 32 to 34 of IFRS 8 (see below) shall be provided
only if it is not provided as part of the reportable segment information required by IFRS 8.
Information about products and services
IFRS 8:32 An entity shall report the revenues from external customers for each product and service or each group of similar
products and services, unless the necessary information is not available and the cost to develop it would be excessive.
IFRS 8:32 Note: The amounts of revenues reported shall be based on the financial information used to produce the entity’s
financial statements.
IFRS 8:32 Where the disclosures required under paragraph 32 of IFRS 8 (see above) are not made because the information is not
available and the cost to develop it would be excessive, that fact shall be disclosed.
Information about geographical areas
An entity shall report the following geographical information, unless the necessary information is not available and the
cost to develop it would be excessive:
IFRS 8:33(a) a) revenues from external customers:
i) attributed to the entity’s country of domicile; and
ii) attributed to all foreign countries in total from which the entity derives revenues;
IFRS 8:33(a) b) revenues from external customers attributed to an individual foreign country, where those revenues are material;
IFRS 8:33(a) c) the basis for attributing revenues from external customers to individual countries;
IFRS 8:33(b) d) non-current assets other than financial instruments, deferred tax assets, post-employment benefit assets, and rights
arising under insurance contracts:
i) located in the entity’s country of domicile; and
ii) located in all foreign countries in total in which the entity holds assets; and
Note: For assets classified according to a liquidity presentation, non-current assets are assets that include
amounts expected to be recovered more than twelve months after the reporting period.
IFRS 8:33(b) e) where non-current assets other than financial instruments, deferred tax assets, post-employment benefit assets, and
rights arising under insurance contracts in an individual foreign country are material, those assets disclosed
separately.
IFRS 8:33 Note: The amounts reported under paragraph 33 of IFRS 8 (see above) shall be based on the financial
information that is used to produce the entity’s financial statements.

IFRS 8:33 Where the necessary information for the disclosures required under paragraph 33 of IFRS 8 (see above) is not available,
and the cost to develop it would be excessive, that fact shall be disclosed.
IFRS 8:33 An entity may provide, in addition to the information required by paragraph 33 of IFRS 8 (see above), subtotals of
geographical information about groups of countries.
Information about major customers
IFRS 8:34 An entity shall provide information about the extent of its reliance on its major customers.
IFRS 8:34 If revenues from transactions with a single external customer amount to 10 per cent or more of an entity’s revenues, the
entity shall disclose that fact, the total amount of revenues from each such customer, and the identity of the segment or
segments reporting the revenues.
IFRS 8:34 Notes:
1) The entity need not disclose the identity of a major customer nor the amount of revenues that each segment
reports from that customer.
2) For the purposes of IFRS 8, a group of entities known to a reporting entity to be under common control shall be
considered a single customer and a government (national, state, provincial, territorial, local or foreign) and entities
known to the reporting entity to be under the control of that government shall be considered a single customer.
IFRS 8:34 2) For the purposes of IFRS 8, a group of entities known to a reporting entity to be under common control shall be
considered a single customer. However, judgement is required to assess whether a government (including
government agencies and similar bodies whether local, national or international) and entities known to the
reporting entity to be under the control of that government are considered a single customer. In assessing this, the
reporting entity shall consider the extent of economic integration between those entities.
IFRS 8:36B Note: IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures (as revised in 2009) amended paragraph 34 for annual periods beginning on or
after 1 January 2011. If an entity applies IAS 24 (revised 2009) for an earlier period, it shall apply the
amendment to paragraph 34 for that earlier period.
Restatement of prior year segment information on adoption of IFRS 8
IFRS 8:36 Segment information for prior years that is reported as comparative information for the initial year of application
(including application of the amendment to paragraph 23 made in April 2009) shall be restated to conform to the
requirements of IFRS 8, unless the necessary information is not available and the cost to develop it would be excessive.
58

In 2009, the IASB announced an accelerated timetable for replacing IAS 39 in response to the input received from a
number of constituents. The IASB divided its project to replace IAS 39 into three main phases, including classification
and measurement, impairment methodology and hedge accounting. Accordingly, in November 2009, the IASB issued
the chapters of IFRS 9 relating to the classification and measurement of financial assets.
IFRS 9 does not generally deal with presentation and disclosure – IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures and IAS 32
Financial Instruments: Presentation are the Standards providing guidance in these areas (see relevant sections of this
checklist).
An entity shall apply IFRS 9 for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. Earlier application is permitted.
If an entity applies IFRS 9 for a reporting period beginning before 1 January 2013, it shall disclose that fact and at the
same time apply the amendments to other IFRSs listed in Appendix C of IFRS 9.
Adoption of Standard in advance of effective date
IFRS 9:8.1.1 If the entity has applied IFRS 9 (and the amendments to other IFRSs listed in Appendix C of IFRS 9) for a period
beginning before 1 January 2013, it shall disclose that fact.
IFRS 9:8.2.3 If the date of initial application of IFRS 9 is not at the beginning of a reporting period, the entity shall disclose that fact
and the reasons for using that date of initial application.
Note: For the purpose of the transition provisions in paragraphs 8.2.1 and 8.2.3 to 8.2.13 of IFRS 9, the date of initial
application is the date when an entity first applies the requirements of IFRS 9. The date of initial application
may be:
a) any date between 12 November 2009 (the date IFRS 9 was issued) and 31 December 2010, for entities
initially applying IFRS 9 before 1 January 2011; or
b) the beginning of the first reporting period in which the entity adopts IFRS 9, for entities initially applying
IFRS 9 on or after 1 January 2011.
59
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

This section of the checklist addresses IAS 1, which prescribes the basis for presentation of general purpose financial
statements to ensure comparability both with the entity’s financial statements of previous periods and with the financial
statements of other entities.
The illustrative guidance issued with IAS 1 provides simple examples of ways in which the requirements of the Standard
for the presentation of the statement of financial position, statement of comprehensive income and statement of
changes in equity might be met.
• amended paragraph 69(d) (added by Improvements to IFRSs issued in April 2009 and effective for annual periods
beginning on or after1 January 2010); and
• amended paragraph 106 (consequential amendment arising from IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements issued in January 2008 and effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009).
IAS 1 or amend existing paragraphs in IAS 1:
• IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (issued November 2009) makes a number of consequential amendments to IAS 1.
The consequential amendments to IAS 1 should be applied when the entity applies IFRS 9; and
• Improvements to IFRSs (issued May 2010) makes amendments to IAS 1. The amendments are effective for annual
Complete set of financial statements
A complete set of financial statements comprises:
IAS 1:10(a) a) a statement of financial position as at the end of the period;
IAS 1:10(b) b) an statement of comprehensive income for the period;
IAS 1:10(c) c) a statement of changes in equity for the period:
IAS 1:10(d) d) a statement of cash flows for the period;
IAS 1:10(e) e) notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information; and
IAS 1:10(f) f) when an entity applies an accounting policy retrospectively or makes a retrospective restatement of items in its
financial statements, or when it reclassifies items in its financial statements, a statement of financial position as at
the beginning of the earliest comparative period.
IAS 1:12 Notes:
IAS 1:10 1) An entity may use titles for the statements other than those used in IAS 1
IAS 1:12 2) The components of profit or loss may be presented either as part of a single statement of comprehensive income or
in an income statement, as permitted by paragraph 81 of IAS 1 (see below).
IAS 1:11 All of the financial statements in a complete set of financial statements shall be presented with equal prominence.
IAS 1:12 When an income statement is presented, it shall be presented with equal prominence as the other financial statements
and displayed immediately before the statement of comprehensive income.
60
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements

Fair presentation and compliance with IFRSs
IAS 1:15 The financial statements shall present fairly the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the entity.
IAS 1:15 Notes:
1) Fair presentation requires the faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other events and conditions, in
accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the
Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements (the Framework). The application of IFRSs,
with additional disclosure when necessary, is presumed to result in financial statements that achieve a fair
presentation.
IAS 1:17 2) In virtually all circumstances, an entity achieves a fair presentation by compliance with applicable IFRSs. A fair
presentation also requires an entity:
• to select and apply accounting policies in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting
Estimates and Errors, which sets out a hierarchy of authoritative guidance that management considers in the
absence of an IFRS that specially applies to an item;
• to present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable
and understandable information; and
• to provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRSs is insufficient to
enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity’s
financial position and financial performance.
IAS 1:16 An entity whose financial statements comply with IFRSs shall make an explicit and unreserved statement of such
compliance in the notes.
Notes:
IAS 1:16 1) An entity shall not describe financial statements as complying with IFRSs unless they comply with all the
requirements of IFRSs.
IAS 1:18 2) An entity cannot rectify inappropriate accounting policies either by disclosure of the accounting policies used or
by notes or explanatory material.
IAS 1:19 In the extremely rare circumstances in which management concludes that compliance with a requirement in an IFRS
would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework, the
entity shall depart from that requirement in the manner set out in paragraph 20 of IAS 1 (see below) if the relevant
regulatory framework requires, or otherwise does not prohibit, such a departure.
IAS 1:24 Notes:
1) An item of information would conflict with the objective of financial statements when it does not represent
faithfully the transactions, other events and conditions that it either purports to represent or could reasonably be
expected to represent and, consequently, it would be likely to influence economic decisions made by users of
2) When assessing whether complying with a specific requirement in an IFRS would be so misleading that it would
conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework, management considers:
• why the objective of financial statements is not achieved in the particular circumstances; and
• how the entity’s circumstances differ from those of other entities that comply with the requirement. If other
entities in similar circumstances comply with the requirement, there is a rebuttable presumption that the entity’s
compliance with the requirement would not be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of
financial statements set out in the Framework.
IAS 1:20 When an entity has departed from a requirement of an IFRS in accordance with paragraph 19 of IAS 1 (see above), it
shall disclose:
IAS 1:20(a) a) that management has concluded that the financial statements present fairly the entity’s financial position, financial
performance and cash flows;

IAS 1:20(b) b) that it has complied with applicable IFRSs, except that it has departed from a particular requirement to achieve a fair
presentation;
IAS 1:20(c) c) i) the title of the IFRS from which the entity has departed;
ii) the nature of the departure (including the treatment that the IFRS would require);
iii) the reason why that treatment would be so misleading in the circumstances that it would conflict with the
objective of financial statements set out in the Framework; and
iv) the treatment adopted; and
IAS 1:20(d) d) for each period presented, the financial impact of the departure on each item in the financial statements that would
have been reported in complying with the requirement.
IAS 1:21 When an entity has departed from a requirement of an IFRS in a prior period, and that departure affects the amounts
recognised in the financial statements for the current period, it shall make the disclosures set out in paragraphs 20(c) and
20(d) of IAS 1 (see above).
IAS 1:22 Note: Paragraph 21 of IAS 1 (see above) applies, for example, when an entity departed in a prior period from a
requirement in an IFRS for the measurement of assets or liabilities and that departure affects the measurement
of changes in assets and liabilities recognised in the current period’s financial statements.
IAS 1:23 In the extremely rare circumstances in which management concludes that compliance with an IFRS would be so
misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework, but the relevant
regulatory framework prohibits departure from the requirement, the entity shall, to the maximum extent possible, reduce
the perceived misleading aspects of compliance by disclosing:
IAS 1:23(a) a) i) the title of the IFRS in question;
ii) the nature of the requirement; and
iii) the reason why management has concluded that complying with that requirement is so misleading in the
circumstances that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework; and
IAS 1.23(b) b) for each period presented, the adjustments to each item in the financial statements that management has
concluded would be necessary to achieve a fair presentation.
Going concern
IAS 1:25 When preparing financial statements, management shall make an assessment of an entity’s ability to continue as a going
concern.
IAS 1:25 An entity shall prepare financial statements on a going concern basis unless management either intends to liquidate the
entity or to cease trading, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
IAS 1:25 When management is aware, in making its assessment of the entity's ability to continue as a going concern, of material
uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a
going concern, the entity shall disclose those uncertainties.
IAS 1:25 When an entity does not prepare financial statements on a going concern basis, it shall disclose that fact, together with
the basis on which the financial statements are prepared and the reason why the entity is not regarded as a going
concern.
Accrual basis of accounting
IAS 1:27 An entity shall prepare its financial statements, except for cash flow information, using the accrual basis of accounting.
Materiality and aggregation
IAS 1:29 An entity shall present each material class of similar items separately in the financial statements.
Notes:
IAS 1:7 1) Omissions or misstatements of items are material if they could, individually or collectively, influence the economic
decisions that users make on the basis of the financial statements. Materiality depends on the size and nature of
the omission or misstatement judged in the surrounding circumstances. The size or nature of the item, or a
combination of both, could be the determining factor.
62

IAS 1:29 2) An entity shall present separately items of a dissimilar nature or function unless they are immaterial.
IAS 1:30 3) If a line item is not individually material, it is aggregated with other items either in those financial statements or in
the notes.
IAS 1:30 4) An item that is not sufficiently material to warrant separate presentation in the financial statements may warrant
separate presentation in the notes.
IAS 1:31 5) An entity need not provide a specific disclosure required by an IFRS if the information is not material.
Offsetting
IAS 1:32 An entity shall not offset assets and liabilities or income and expenses, unless required or permitted by an IFRS.
IAS 1:33 Note: Measuring assets net of valuation allowances (e.g. obsolescence allowances on inventories and doubtful
allowances on receivables) is not offsetting.
IAS 1:34 Where an entity undertakes, in the course of its ordinary activities, transactions that do not generate revenue but that
are incidental to its main revenue-generating activities, the results of such transactions are presented by netting any
income with the related expenses arising on the same transaction, when such presentation reflects the substance of the
transaction or other event.
IAS 1:34 Note: Examples of items to be presented net include the following:
• gains and losses on the disposal of non-current assets, including investments and operating assets, are
reported by deducting from the proceeds on disposal the carrying amount of the asset and related selling
expenses; and
• expenditure related to a provision that is recognised in accordance with IAS 37, and reimbursed under a
contractual arrangement with a third party (e.g. a supplier’s warranty agreement) may be netted against the
related reimbursement.
IAS 1:35 An entity presents gains and losses arising from a group of similar transactions (e.g. foreign exchange gains and losses,
or gains and losses arising on financial instruments held for trading) on a net basis unless the gains and losses are material,
in which case the entity presents such gains and losses separately.
Frequency of reporting
When an entity changes the end of its reporting period and presents financial statements for a period longer or shorter
than one year, the entity shall disclose:
IAS 1:36 a) the period covered by the financial statements;
IAS 1:36(a) b) the reason for using a period longer or shorter than one year; and
IAS 1:36(b) c) the fact that amounts presented in the financial statements are not entirely comparable.
Notes:
IAS 1:36 1) An entity shall present a complete set of financial statements (including comparative information) at least annually.
IAS 1:37 2) Normally, an entity consistently prepares financial statements for a one-year period. However, for practical reasons,
some entities prefer to report, for example, for a 52-week period. IAS 1 does not preclude this practice.
Comparative information
IAS 1:38 Except when IFRSs permit or require otherwise, an entity shall disclose comparative information in respect of the
previous period for all amounts reported in the current period's financial statements.
IAS 1:38 An entity shall include comparative information for narrative and descriptive information when it is relevant to an
understanding of the current period’s financial statements.

Notes:
IAS 1:40 1) In some cases, narrative information provided in the financial statements for the previous period(s) continues to be
relevant in the current period. For example, an entity discloses in the current period details of a legal dispute, the
outcome of which was uncertain at the end of the immediately preceding reporting period and that is yet to be
resolved. Users benefit from information that the uncertainty existed at the end of the immediately preceding
reporting period, and about the steps that have been taken during the period to resolve the uncertainty.
IAS 1:40 2) In some cases, narrative information provided in the financial statements for the previous period(s) continues to be
relevant in the current period. For example, an entity discloses in the current period details of a legal dispute, the
outcome of which was uncertain at the end of the immediately preceding reporting period and that is yet to be
resolved. Users benefit from information that the uncertainty existed at the end of the immediately preceding
reporting period, and about the steps that have been taken during the period to resolve the uncertainty.
IAS 1:39 3) An entity disclosing comparative information shall present, as a minimum, two statements of financial position,
two of each of the other statements, and related notes.
IAS 1:39 4) As required by IAS 1.10(f) (see above), when an entity applies an accounting policy retrospectively, or makes a
retrospective restatement of items in the financial statements, or reclassifies items in its financial statements, it
shall present as a minimum, three statements of financial position, two of each of the other statements, and
related notes. Therefore, an entity presents statements of financial position as at:
• the end of the current period;
• the end of the previous period; and
• the beginning of the earliest comparative period.
IAS 1:41 When the entity changes the presentation or classification of items in the financial statements, the entity shall reclassify
comparative amounts, unless it is impracticable to do so.
IAS 1:44 Note: IAS 8 sets out the adjustments to comparative information required when an entity changes an accounting
policy or corrects an error (see relevant section of this checklist).
When the entity reclassifies comparative amounts, the entity shall disclose:
IAS 1:41(a) a) the nature of the reclassification;
IAS 1:41(b) b) the amount of each item or class of items that is reclassified; and
IAS 1:41(c) c) the reason for the reclassification.
When it is impracticable to reclassify comparative amounts, an entity shall disclose:
IAS 1:42(a) a) the reason for not reclassifying the amounts; and
IAS 1:42(b) b) the nature of the adjustments that would have been made if the amounts had been reclassified.
Consistency of presentation
IAS 1:45 An entity shall retain the presentation and classification of items in the financial statements from one period to the next,
unless:
IAS 1:45(a) a) it is apparent, following a significant change in the nature of the entity’s operations or a review of its financial
statements, that another presentation or classification would be more appropriate having regard to the criteria for
the selection and application of accounting policies in IAS 8; or
IAS 1:45(b) b) an IFRS requires a change in presentation.
IAS 1:46 Note: For example, a significant acquisition or disposal, or a review of the presentation of the financial statements,
might suggest that the financial statements need to be presented differently. An entity changes the presentation
of its financial statements only if the changed presentation provides information that is reliable and more
relevant to users of the financial statements and the revised structure is likely to continue, so that comparability
is not impaired. When making such changes in presentation, an entity reclassifies its comparative information in
accordance with paragraphs 41 and 42 of IAS 1 (see above).
64

Identification of the financial statements
IAS 1:49 An entity shall clearly identify the financial statements and distinguish them from other information in the same
published document.
IAS 1:50 Note: IFRSs apply only to the financial statements, and not necessarily to other information presented in an annual
report, a regulatory filing, or another document. Therefore, it is important that users can distinguish
information that is prepared using IFRSs from other information that may be useful to users but is not the
subject of those requirements.
IAS 1:51 An entity shall clearly identify each financial statement and the notes.
IAS 1:51 An entity shall display the following information prominently, and repeat it when it is necessary for the information
presented to be understandable:
IAS 1:51(a) a) the name of the reporting entity or other means of identification, and any change in that information from the end
of the preceding reporting period;
IAS 1:51(b) b) whether the financial statements are of the individual entity or a group of entities;
IAS 1:51(c) c) the date of the end of the reporting period or the period covered by the set of financial statements or notes;
IAS 1:51(d) d) the presentation currency, as defined in IAS 21 The Effects of Foreign Exchange Rates; and
IAS 1:51(e) e) the level of rounding used in presenting amounts in the financial statements.
Notes:
IAS 1:52 1) An entity meets the requirements of paragraph 51 of IAS 1 (see above) by presenting appropriate headings for
pages, statement, notes, columns and the like. Judgement is required in determining the best way of presenting
such information. For example, when the financial statements are presented electronically, separate pages are not
always used. An entity then presents the above items frequently enough to ensure that the information included in
the financial statements can be understood.
IAS 1:53 2) An entity often makes financial statements more understandable by presenting information in thousands or millions
of units of the presentation currency. This is acceptable as long as the entity discloses the level of rounding in
presentation and does not omit material information.
Information to be presented in the statement of financial position
IAS 1:54 As a minimum, the statement of financial position sheet shall include line items that present the following amounts:
IAS 1:54(a) a) property, plant and equipment;
IAS 1:54(b) b) investment property;
IAS 1:54(c) c) intangible assets;
IAS 1:54(d) d) financial assets (excluding amounts shown under (e), (h) and (i) below);
IAS 1:54(e) e) investments accounted for using the equity method;
IAS 1:54(f) f) biological assets
IAS 1:54(g) g) inventories;
IAS 1:54(h) h) trade and other receivables;
IAS 1:54(i) i) cash and cash equivalents;
IAS 1:54(j) j) the total of assets classified as held for sale and assets included in disposal groups classified as held for sale in
accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations;
IAS 1:54(k) k) trade and other payables;
IAS 1:54(l) l) provisions;

IAS 1:54(m) m) financial liabilities (excluding amounts shown under (k) and (l) above);
IAS 1:54(n) n) liabilities and assets for current tax, as defined in IAS 12 Income Taxes;
IAS 1:54(o) o) deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets, as defined in IAS 12;
IAS 1:54(p) p) liabilities included in disposal groups classified as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5;
IAS 1:54(q) q) non-controlling interest, presented within equity; and
IAS 1:54(r) r) issued capital and reserves attributable to owners of the parent.
Notes:
IAS 1:57 1) IAS 1 does not prescribe the order or format in which an entity presents items. Paragraph 54 of IAS 1 (see above)
simply lists items that are sufficiently different in nature or function to warrant separate presentation in the
statement of financial position.
IAS 1:57 2) In addition:
• line items are included when the size, nature or function of an item or aggregation of similar items is such that
separate presentation is relevant to an understanding of the entity’s financial position; and
• the descriptions used and the ordering of items or aggregation of similar items may be amended according to
the nature of the entity and its transactions, to provide information that is relevant to an understanding of the
entity’s financial position (e.g. a financial institution may amend the above descriptions to provide information
that is relevant to the operations of a financial institution).
IAS 1:55 An entity shall present additional line items, headings and sub-totals in the statement of financial position such
presentation is relevant to an understanding of the entity’s financial position.
Notes:
IAS 1:58 1) An entity makes the judgement about whether to present additional items separately on the basis of an assessment of:
• the nature and liquidity of assets;
• the function of assets within the entity; and
• the amounts, nature and timing of liabilities.
IAS 1:59 2) The use of different measurement bases for different classes of assets suggests that their nature or function differs
and, therefore, that they should be presented as separate line items. For example different classes of property, plant
and equipment can be carried at cost or at revalued amounts in accordance with IAS 16 Property, Plant and
Equipment.
IAS 1:56 When an entity presents current and non-current assets, and current and non-current liabilities, as separate classifications
in its statement of financial position, it shall not classify deferred tax assets (liabilities) as current assets (liabilities).
Current/non-current distinction
IAS 1:60 An entity shall present current and non-current assets, and current and non-current liabilities, as separate classifications
in its statement of financial position except when a presentation based on liquidity provides information that is reliable
and more relevant.
IAS 1:60 When a presentation based on liquidity provides information that is reliable and more relevant than presentation on a
current/non-current basis, the entity shall present all assets and liabilities in order of liquidity.
Notes:
IAS 1:63 1) For some entities, such as financial institutions, a presentation of assets and liabilities in increasing or decreasing
order of liquidity provides information that is reliable and is more relevant than a current/non-current presentation
because the entity does not supply goods or services within a clearly identifiable operating cycle.
IAS 1:64 2) An entity is permitted to present some of its assets and liabilities using a current/non-current distinction and others
in order of liquidity when this provides information that is reliable and more relevant. The need for a mixed basis of
presentation may arise when an entity has diverse operations.
66

IAS 1:61 Whichever of the methods of presentation allowed for under paragraph 60 of IAS 1 (see above) is adopted, for each
asset and liability line item that combines amounts expected to be recovered or settled (i) no more than twelve months
after the reporting period, and (ii) more than twelve months after the reporting period, an entity shall disclose the
amount expected to be recovered or settled after more than twelve months.
IAS 1:65 Note: For example, an entity discloses the amount of inventories that are expected to be recovered more than twelve
months after the reporting period.
Current assets
An entity shall classify an asset as current when any of the following criteria are met:
IAS 1:66(a) a) it expects to realise the asset, or intends to sell or consume it, in its normal operating cycle;
IAS 1:68 Note: The operating cycle of an entity is the time between the acquisition of assets for processing and their realisation
in cash or cash equivalents. When the entity’s normal operating cycle is not clearly identifiable, its duration is
assumed to be twelve months. Current assets include assets (such as inventories and trade receivables) that are
sold, consumed or realised as part of the normal operating cycle even when they are not expected to be
realised within twelve months after the reporting period.
IAS 1:66(b) b) it holds the asset primarily for the purpose of trading;
IAS 1:66(c) c) it expects to realise the asset within twelve months after the reporting period; or
IAS 1:66(d) d) the asset is cash or a cash equivalent (as defined in IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows), unless the asset is restricted
from being exchanged or used to settle a liability for at least twelve months after the reporting period.
IAS 1:66 An entity shall classify all assets, other than those meeting one of the criteria set out in paragraph 66 of IAS 1 (see
above), as non-current.
IAS 1:67 Note: IAS 1 uses the term ‘non-current’ to include tangible, intangible and financial assets of a long-term nature.
It does not prohibit the use of alternative descriptions as long as the meaning is clear.
Current liabilities
An entity shall classify a liability as current when:
IAS 1:69(a) a) it expects to settle the liability in its normal operating cycle;
IAS 1:70 Note: Some current liabilities, such as trade payables and some accruals for employee and other operating costs, are
part of the working capital used in the entity’s normal operating cycle. Such operating items are classified as
current liabilities even if they are due to be settled more than twelve months after the reporting period. The
same normal operating cycle applies to the classification of an entity’s assets and liabilities. When the entity’s
normal operating cycle is not clearly identifiable, its duration is assumed to be twelve months.
IAS 1:69(b) b) it holds the liability primarily for the purpose of trading;
IAS 1:69(c) c) the liability is due to be settled within twelve months after the reporting period; or
IAS 1:69(d) d) it does not have an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least twelve months after the
reporting period (see paragraph 73, below). Terms of a liability that could at the option of the counterparty result in
its settlement by the issue of equity instruments do not affect its classification.
IAS 1:69 An entity shall classify all liabilities, other than those meeting one of the criteria set out in paragraph 69 of IAS 1 (see
above), as non-current.
IAS 1:72 An entity classifies financial liabilities as current when they are due to be settled within twelve months after the reporting
period, even if:
IAS 1:72(a) a) the original term was for a period longer than twelve months; and
IAS 1:72(b) b) an agreement to refinance, or to reschedule payments, on a long-term basis is completed after the reporting period
and before the financial statements are authorised for issue.

IAS 1:73 If an entity expects, and has the discretion, to refinance or roll over an obligation for at least twelve months after the
reporting period under an existing loan facility, it classifies the obligation as non-current, even if it would otherwise be
due within a shorter period.
IAS 1:73 Note: However, when refinancing or rolling over the obligation is not at the discretion of the entity (e.g. there is no
arrangement for refinancing), the entity does not consider the potential to refinance the obligation and classifies the
obligation as current.
IAS 1:74 When an entity breaches a provision of a long-term loan agreement on or before the end of the reporting period with
the effect that the liability becomes payable on demand, it classifies the liability as current, even if the lender agreed,
after the reporting period and before the authorisation of the financial statements for issue, not to demand payment as
a consequence of the breach.
Notes:
IAS 1:74 1) In the circumstances described in paragraph 74 of IAS 1 (see above), the entity classifies the liability as current
because, at the end of the reporting period, it does not have an unconditional right to defer its settlement for at
least twelve months after that date.
2) See the next point below for circumstances where the lender has agreed to an extended period of grace on or
before the end of the reporting period.
IAS 1:75 When an entity breaches a provision under a long-term loan agreement on or before the end of the reporting period with
the effect that the liability becomes payable on demand, it classifies the liability as non-current if the lender has agreed by
the end of the reporting period to provide a period of grace ending at least twelve months after the reporting period,
within which the entity can rectify the breach and during which the lender cannot demand immediate repayment.
IAS 1:76 In respect of loans classified as current liabilities, if the following events occur between the end of the reporting period
and the date the financial statements are authorised for issue, those events are disclosed as non-adjusting events in
accordance with IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period:
a) refinancing on a long-term basis;
b) rectification of a breach of a long-term loan agreement; and
c) the granting by the lender of a period of grace to rectify a breach of a long-term loan agreement ending at least
twelve months after the reporting period.
Information to be presented either in the statement of financial position or in the notes
IAS 1:77 An entity shall disclose, either in the statement of financial position or in the notes, further sub-classifications of the line
items presented, classified in a manner appropriate to the entity’s operations.
IAS 1:78 Note: The detail provided in subclassifications depends on the requirements of IFRSs and on the size, nature and
function of the amounts involved. An entity also uses the factors set out in paragraph 58 of IAS 1 (see above)
to decide the basis of sub-classification. The disclosures vary for each item, for example:
• items of property, plant and equipment are disaggregated into classes in accordance with IAS 16 Property,
Plant and Equipment;
• receivables are disaggregated into amounts receivable from trade customers, receivables from related parties,
prepayments and other amounts;
• inventories are disaggregated (in accordance with IAS 2 Inventories) into classifications such as merchandise,
production supplies, materials, work in progress and finished goods;
• provisions are disaggregated into provisions for employee benefits and other items; and
• equity capital and reserves are disaggregated into various classes, such as paid-in capital, share premium and
reserves.
68

An entity shall disclose the following, either in the statement of financial position or the statement of changes in equity, or
in the notes:
IAS 1:79(a) a) for each class of share capital:
i) the number of shares authorised;
ii) the number of shares issued and fully paid, and issued but not fully paid;
iii) par value per share, or that the shares have no par value;
iv) a reconciliation of the number of shares outstanding at the beginning and at the end of the period;
v) the rights, preferences and restrictions attaching to that class, including restrictions on the distribution of
dividends and the repayment of capital;
vi) shares in the entity held by the entity or by its subsidiaries or associates; and
vii) shares reserved for issue under options and contracts for the sale of shares, including the terms and amounts;
and
IAS 1:79(b) b) a description of the nature and purpose of each reserve within equity.
IAS 1:80 An entity without share capital (e.g. a partnership or trust), shall disclose information equivalent to that required by
paragraph 79(a) of IAS 1 (see above), showing changes during the period in each category of equity interest and the
rights, preferences and restrictions attaching to each category of equity interest.
IAS 1:80A If an entity has reclassified between financial liabilities and equity either (i) a puttable financial instrument classified as an
equity instrument, or (ii) an instrument that imposes on the entity an obligation to deliver to another party a pro rata
share of the net assets of the entity only on liquidation and is classified as an equity instrument between financial
liabilities and equity and is classified as an equity instrument, it shall disclose:
a) the amount reclassified into and out of each category (financial liabilities or equity); and
b) the timing and reason for that classification:
An entity shall present all items of income and expense recognised in a period either:
IAS 1:81(a) a) in a single statement of comprehensive income; or
IAS 1:81(b) b) in two statements: a statement displaying components of profit or loss (separate income statement) and a second
statement beginning with profit or loss and displaying components of other comprehensive income (statement of
comprehensive income).
Information to be presented in the statement of comprehensive income
As a minimum, the statement of comprehensive income shall include line items that present the following amounts for
the period:
IAS 1:82(a) a) revenue;
IAS 1:82(aa) aa) gains and losses arising from the derecognition of financial assets measured at amortised cost;
IAS 1:82(b) b) finance costs;
IAS 1:82(c) c) share of profit or loss of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method;
IFRS 1:82(ca) ca) if a financial assets is reclassified so that it is measured at fair value, any gain or loss arising from a difference
between the previous carrying amount and its fair value at the reclassification date (as defined in IFRS 9);
IAS 1:82(d) d) tax expense;
IAS 1:82(e) e) a single amount comprising the total of:
i) the post-tax profit or loss of discontinued operations; and
ii) the post-tax gain or loss recognised on the measurement to fair value less costs to sell or on the disposal of the
assets or disposal group(s) constituting the discontinued operation;

IAS 1:82(f) f) profit or loss;
IAS 1:82(g) g) each component of other comprehensive income classified by nature (excluding amounts in (h) (see below);
IAS 1:82(h) h) share of the other comprehensive income of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method;
and
IAS 1:82(i) i) total comprehensive income.
Note: IFRS 9, issued in November 2009, added paragraphs 82(aa) and 82(ca) above. These amendments should be
applied when the entity applies IFRS 9.
An entity shall disclose the following items in the statement of comprehensive income as allocations for the period:
IAS 1:83(a) a) profit or loss for the period attributable to:
i) non-controlling interests; and
ii) owners of the parent; and
IAS 1:83(b) b) total comprehensive income for the period attributable to:
i) non-controlling interests; and
ii) owners of the parent.
IAS 1:84 An entity may present the line items in paragraphs 82(a) – (f) and the disclosures in paragraph 83(a) of IAS 1 (see above)
in a separate income statement (see paragraph 81(b) above).
IAS 1:85 An entity shall present additional line items, headings and subtotals in the statement of comprehensive income and the
separate income statement (if presented), when such presentation is relevant to an understanding of the entity’s
financial performance.
IAS 1:86 Note: An entity includes additional line items in the statement of comprehensive income and in the separate income
statement (if presented), and it amends the descriptions used and the ordering of items, when this is necessary
to explain the elements of financial performance. An entity considers factors such as materiality and the nature
and function of the items of income and expense. For example, a financial institution may amend the
descriptions to provide information that is relevant to the operations of a financial institution.
IAS 1:87 An entity shall not present any items of income or expense as extraordinary items, in the statement of comprehensive
income or in the separate income statement (if presented), or in the notes.
Profit or loss for the period
IAS 1:88 An entity shall recognise all items of income and expense in a period in profit or loss unless an IFRS requires or permits
otherwise.
Notes:
IAS 1:89 1) Some IFRSs specify circumstances when an entity recognises particular items outside profit or loss in the current
period. IAS 8 specifies two such circumstances: the correction of errors and the effect of changes in accounting
policies.
IAS 1:89 2) Other IFRSs require components of other comprehensive income that meet the Framework's definition of income or
expense to be excluded from profit or loss (see paragraph 7 of IAS 1). Examples include revaluation surpluses (see
IAS 16), actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit plans recognised in accordance with paragraph 93A of
IAS 19, gains and losses arising from translating the financial statements of a foreign operation (see IAS 21); gains
or losses on remeasuring available-for-sale financial assets (see IAS 39) and the effective portion of gains and
losses on hedging instruments in a cash flow hedge (see IAS 39).
70

Other comprehensive income for the period
IAS 1:90 An entity shall disclose the amount of income tax relating to each component of other comprehensive income, including
reclassification adjustments, either in the statement of comprehensive income or in the notes.
IAS 1:91 Note: An entity may present components of other comprehensive income either (a) net of related tax effects; or (b)
before related tax effects with one amount shown for the aggregate amount of income tax relating to those
components.
IAS 1:92 An entity shall disclose reclassification adjustments relating to components of other comprehensive income.
IAS 1:93 Note: Other IFRSs specify whether and when amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are
reclassified to profit or loss. Such reclassifications are referred to in IAS 1 as reclassification adjustments.
A reclassification adjustment is included with the related component of other comprehensive income in the
period that the adjustment is reclassified to profit or loss. These amounts may have been recognised in other
comprehensive income as unrealised gains in the current or previous periods. Those unrealised gains must be
deducted from other comprehensive income in the period in which the realised gains are reclassified to profit
or loss to avoid including them in total comprehensive income twice.
IAS 1:94 An entity may present reclassification adjustments in the statement of comprehensive income or in the notes.
IAS 1:94 An entity presenting reclassification adjustments in the notes presents the components of other comprehensive income
after any related reclassification adjustments.
Notes:
IAS 1:95 1) Reclassification adjustments arise, for example, on disposal of a foreign operation (see IAS 21), and when a hedged
forecast transaction affects profit or loss (see paragraph 100 of IAS 39 in relation to cash flow hedges).
IAS 1:96 2) Reclassification adjustments do not arise on changes in revaluation surplus recognised in accordance with IAS 16 or
IAS 38, or actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit plans recognised in accordance with paragraph 93A of
IAS 19. These components are recognised in other comprehensive income and are not reclassified to profit or loss
in subsequent periods.
Information to be presented in the statement of comprehensive income or in the notes
IAS 1:97 When items of income and expense are material, an entity shall disclose their nature and amount separately.
IAS 1:98 Note: Circumstances that would give rise to the separate disclosure of items of income and expense include:
• write-downs of inventories to net realisable value or of property, plant and equipment to recoverable
amount, as well as reversals of such write-downs;
• restructurings of the activities of an entity and reversals of any provisions for the costs of restructuring;
• disposals of items of property, plant and equipment;
• disposals of investments;
• discontinued operations;
• litigation settlements; and
• other reversals of provisions.
IAS 1:99 An entity shall present an analysis of expenses recognised in profit or loss using a classification based on either the nature
of expenses or their function within the entity, whichever provides information that is reliable and more relevant.

Notes:
IAS 1:100 1) Entities are encouraged to present the analysis in paragraph 99 of IAS 1 (see above) in the statement of
comprehensive income or in the separate income statement (if presented).
IAS 1:102 2) Under the ‘nature of expense’ method, an entity aggregates expenses within profit or loss according to their nature
(e.g. depreciation, purchases of materials, transport costs, employee benefits and advertising costs), and does not
reallocate them among functions within the entity. This method may be simple to apply because no allocations of
expenses to functional classifications are necessary. See paragraph 102 of IAS 1 for an example of a classification
using the nature of expense method.
IAS 1:103 3) The second form of analysis is the ‘function of expense’ or ‘cost of sales’ method, which classifies expenses
according to their function as part of cost of sales or, for example, the costs of distribution or administrative
activities. At a minimum, an entity discloses its cost of sales under this method separately from other expenses.
This method can provide more relevant information to users than the classification of expenses by nature, but
allocating costs to functions may require arbitrary allocations and involve considerable judgement. See paragraph 103
of IAS 1 for an example of a classification using the function of expense method.
IAS 1:104 An entity classifying expenses by function shall disclose additional information on the nature of expenses, including
depreciation and amortisation expense and employee benefits expense.
IAS 1:105 Note: Although entities are permitted to select the classification of expenses as described in previous paragraphs,
because information on the nature of expenses is useful in predicting future cash flows, additional disclosure is
required when the function of expense classification is used. In paragraph 104 of IAS 1 (see above), ‘employee
benefits’ has the same meaning as in IAS 19.
Statement of changes in equity
An entity shall present a statement of changes in equity, showing in the statement:
IAS 1:106(a) a) total comprehensive income for the period, showing separately the total amounts attributable to owners of the
parent and to non-controlling interests;
IAS 1:106(b) b) for each component of equity, the effects of retrospective application or retrospective restatement recognised in
accordance with IAS 8; and
IAS 1:106(c) c) [deleted]
IAS 1:106(d) d) for each component of equity, a reconciliation between the carrying amount at the beginning and the end of the
period, separately disclosing changes resulting from:
i) profit or loss:
ii) each item of other comprehensive income; and
iii) transactions with owners in their capacity as owners, showing separately contributions by and distributions to
owners and changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries that do not result in loss of control.
An entity shall present a statement of changes in equity as required by paragraph 10 of IAS 1. The statement of changes in
equity includes the following information:
IAS 1:106(a) a) total comprehensive income for the period, showing separately the total amounts attributable to owners of the
parent and to non-controlling interests;
IAS 1:106(b) b) for each component of equity, the effects of retrospective application or retrospective restatement recognised in
accordance with IAS 8; and
IAS 1:106(c) c) [deleted]
IAS 1:106(d) d) for each component of equity, a reconciliation between the carrying amount at the beginning and the end of the
period, separately disclosing changes resulting from:
i) profit or loss:
ii) other comprehensive income; and
72

iii) transactions with owners in their capacity as owners, showing separately contributions by and distributions to
owners and changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries that do not result in loss of control.
Note: Paragraph 106 of IAS 1 was amended and paragraph 106A (see below) added by Improvements to IFRSs
issued in May 2010, to clarify that entities may present the required reconciliations for each component of
other comprehensive income either in the statement of changes in equity or in the notes to the financial
statements. The amendment is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. Earlier application is
permitted.
Notes:
IAS 1:108 1) The components of equity referred to in paragraph 106 of IAS 1 (see above) include, for example, each class of
contributed equity, the accumulated balance of each class of other comprehensive income and retained earnings.
IAS 1:110 2) IAS 8 requires retrospective adjustments to effect changes in accounting policies, to the extent practicable (except
when the transitional provisions in another IFRS require otherwise) and to correct errors. Retrospective adjustments
and retrospective restatements are not changes in equity but they are adjustments to the opening balance of
retained earnings, except when an IFRS requires retrospective adjustment of another component of equity.
Paragraph 106(d) of IAS 1 requires disclosure in the statement of changes in equity of the total adjustment to each
component of equity resulting from changes in accounting policies and, separately, from corrections of errors.
These adjustments are disclosed for each prior period and the beginning of the period.
Information to be presented in the statement of changes in equity or in the notes
IAS 1:106A For each component of equity an entity shall present, either in the statement of changes in equity or in the notes, an
analysis of other comprehensive income by item (see paragraphs 106(d)(ii)(above).
Note: Paragraph 106A was added by Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010. An entity shall apply the
amendment for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. Earlier application is permitted.
IAS 1:107 An entity shall present, either in the statement of changes in equity or in the notes:
a) the amount of dividends recognised as distributions to owners during the period, and
b) the related amount of dividends per share.
Notes
Structure of notes
The notes shall:
IAS 1:112(a) a) present information about the basis of preparation of the financial statements and the specific accounting policies
used in accordance with paragraphs 117-124 of IAS 1 (see below);
IAS 1:112(b) b) disclose the information required by IFRSs that is not presented elsewhere in the financial statements; and
IAS 1:112(c) c) provide information that is not presented elsewhere in the financial statements, but is relevant to an understanding
of any of them.
IAS 1:113 An entity shall, as far as practicable, present notes in a systematic manner. An entity shall cross-reference each item in
the statements of financial position and of comprehensive income, in the separate income statement (if presented), and
in the statements of changes in equity and of cash flows to any related information in the notes.

Notes:
IAS 1:114 1) An entity normally presents notes in the following order, to assists users understand the financial statements and
compare them with financial statements of other entities:
• statement of compliance with IFRSs (paragraph 16 of IAS 1) (see above);
• summary of significant accounting policies applied (paragraph 117 of IAS 1) (see below);
• supporting information for items presented in the statements of financial position and of comprehensive
income, in the separate income statement (if presented), and in the statements of changes in equity and of
cash flows, in the order in which each statement and each line item is presented; and
• other disclosures, including (i) contingent liabilities and unrecognised contractual commitments (see IAS 37 );
and (ii) non-financial disclosures, e.g. the entity’s financial risk management objectives and policies (see IFRS 7
Financial Instruments: Disclosures).
IAS 1:115 2) In some circumstances, it may be necessary or desirable to vary the order of specific items within the notes. For
example, an entity may combine information on changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss with information
on maturities of financial instruments, although the former disclosures relate to the statement of comprehensive
income or separate income statement (if presented) and the latter relate to the statement of financial position.
Nevertheless, a systematic structure for the notes is retained as far as practicable.
IAS 1:116 3) An entity may present notes providing information about the basis of preparation of the financial statements and
specific accounting policies as a separate section of the financial statements.
Disclosure of accounting policies
An entity shall disclose in the summary of significant accounting policies:
IAS 1:117(a) a) the measurement basis (or bases) used in preparing the financial statements; and
IAS 1:117(b) b) the other accounting policies used that are relevant to an understanding of the financial statements.
Notes:
IAS 1:118 1) It is important for users to be informed of the measurement basis or bases used in the financial statements
(e.g. historical cost, current cost, net realisable value, fair value or recoverable amount) because the basis on which
an entity prepares the financial statements significantly affects users’ analysis. When an entity uses more than one
measurement basis in the financial statements (e.g. when particular classes of assets are revalued), it is sufficient
to provide an indication of the categories of assets and liabilities to which each measurement basis is applied.
IAS 1:119 2) In deciding whether a particular accounting policy should be disclosed, management considers whether disclosure
would assist users in understanding how transactions, other events and conditions are reflected in the reported
financial performance and financial position. Disclosure of particular accounting policies is especially useful to
users when those policies are selected from alternatives allowed in IFRSs. An example is disclosure of whether a
venturer recognises its interest in a jointly controlled entity using proportionate consolidation or the equity method
(see IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures). Some IFRSs specifically require disclosure of particular accounting policies,
including choices made by management between different policies they allow. For example, IAS 16 requires
disclosure of the measurement bases used for classes of property, plant and equipment.
IAS 1:120 3) Each entity considers the nature of its operations and the policies that the users of its financial statements would
expect to be disclosed for that type of entity. For example, users would expect an entity subject to income taxes to
disclose its accounting policies for income taxes, including those applicable to deferred tax liabilities and assets.
When an entity has significant foreign operations or transactions in foreign currencies, users would expect
disclosure of accounting policies for the recognition of foreign exchange gains and losses.
IAS 1:121 4) An accounting policy may be significant because of the nature of the entity’s operations even if amounts for current
and prior periods are not material.
IAS 1:121 It is appropriate to disclose each significant accounting policy that is not specifically required by IFRSs, but the entity selects
and applies in accordance with IAS 8.
74

Judgements made in the process of applying accounting policies
IAS 1:122 An entity shall disclose, in the summary of significant accounting policies or other notes, the judgements (apart from
those involving estimations – see paragraph 125 of IAS 1 as described below) that management has made in the process
of applying the entity’s accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the
Notes:
IAS 1:122 1) Those judgements involving estimations are dealt with under paragraph 125 of IAS 1 (see below).
IAS 1:123 2) In the process of applying the entity’s accounting policies, management makes various judgements, apart from
those involving estimations, that can significantly affect the amounts it recognises in the financial statements. For
example, management makes judgements in determining:
• when substantially all the significant risks and rewards of ownership of financial assets and lease assets are
transferred to other entities;
• whether, in substance, particular sales of goods are financing arrangements and therefore do not give rise to
revenue; and
• whether the substance of the relationship between the entity and a special purpose entity indicates that the
special purpose entity is controlled by the entity.
Sources of estimation uncertainty
IAS 1:125 An entity shall disclose information about the assumptions it makes about the future, and other major sources of
estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period, that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment
to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year.
In respect of such assets and liabilities, the notes shall include details of:
IAS 1:125(a) a) their nature; and
IAS 1:125(b) b) their carrying amount as at the end of the reporting period.
Notes:
IAS 1:126 1) Determining the carrying amounts of some assets and liabilities requires estimation of the effects of uncertain
future events on those assets and liabilities at the reporting period. For example, in the absence of recently
observed market prices future-oriented estimates are necessary to measure the recoverable amount of classes of
property, plant and equipment, the effect of technological obsolescence on inventories, provisions subject to the
future outcome of litigation in progress, and long-term employee benefit liabilities such as pension obligations.
These estimates involve assumptions about such items as the risk adjustment to cash flows or discount rates, future
changes in salaries and future changes in prices affecting other costs.
IAS 1:127 2) The assumptions and other sources of estimation uncertainty disclosed in accordance with paragraph 125 of IAS 1
(see above) relate to the estimates that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgements. As
the number of variables and assumptions affecting the possible future resolution of the uncertainties increases,
those judgements become more subjective and complex, and the potential for a consequential material adjustment
to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities normally increases accordingly.
IAS 1:128 3) The disclosures in paragraph 125 of IAS 1 (see above) are not required for assets and liabilities with a significant risk
that their carrying amounts might change materially within the next financial year if, at the end of the reporting
period, they are measured at fair value based on recently observed market prices. Such fair values might change
materially within the next financial year but those changes would not arise from assumptions or other sources of
estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period).
IAS 1:129 An entity presents the disclosures in paragraph 125 of IAS 1 (see above) in a manner that helps users of financial
statements to understand the judgements management makes about the future and about other sources of estimation
uncertainty.

Notes:
IAS 1:129 1) The nature and extent of the information provided vary according to the nature of the assumptions and other
circumstances. Examples of the types of disclosures an entity makes are:
• the nature of the assumption or other estimation uncertainty;
• the sensitivity of carrying amounts to the methods, assumptions and estimates underlying their calculation,
including the reasons for the sensitivity;
• the expected resolution of an uncertainty and the range of reasonably possible outcomes within the next
financial year in respect of the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities affected; and
• an explanation of changes made to past assumptions concerning those assets and liabilities, if the uncertainty
remains unresolved.
IAS 1:130 2) IAS 1 does not require an entity to disclose budget information or forecasts in making the disclosures in paragraph
125 of IAS 1 (see above).
IAS 1:131 When it is impracticable to disclose the extent of the possible effects of an assumption or another source of estimation
uncertainty at the end of the reporting period, the entity discloses that it is reasonably possible, on the basis of existing
knowledge, that outcomes within the next financial year that are different from assumptions could require a material
adjustment to the carrying amount of the asset or liability affected. In all cases, the entity discloses the nature and carrying
amount of the specific asset or liability (or class of assets or liabilities) affected by the assumption.
Capital
IAS 1:134 An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate the entity’s objectives,
policies and processes for managing capital.
To comply with paragraph 134 of IAS 1 (see above), the entity discloses the following:
IAS 1:135(a) a) qualitative information about its objectives, policies and processes for managing capital, including:
i) a description of what it manages as capital;
ii) when an entity is subject to externally imposed capital requirements, the nature of those requirements and how
those requirements are incorporated into the management of capital; and
iii) how it is meeting its objectives for managing capital;
IAS 1:135(b) b) summary quantitative data about what it manages as capital;
IAS 1:135(b) Note: Some entities regard some financial liabilities (e.g. some forms of subordinated debt) as part of capital.
Other entities regard capital as excluding some components of equity (e.g. components arising from cash flow
hedges).
IAS 1:135(c) c) any changes in 135(a) and 135(b) (see above) from the previous period;
IAS 1:135(d) d) whether during the period it complied with any externally imposed capital requirements to which it is subject; and
IAS 1:135(e) e) when the entity has not complied with such externally imposed capital requirements, the consequences of such
non-compliance.
IAS 1:135 Note: The entity bases these disclosures on the information provided internally to the entity’s key management
personnel.
IAS 1:136 When an aggregate disclosure of capital requirements and how capital is managed would not provide useful information
or distorts a financial statement user’s understanding of an entity’s capital resources, the entity shall disclose separate
information for each capital requirement to which the entity is subject.
IAS 1:136 Note: An entity may manage capital in a number of ways and be subject to a number of different capital
requirements. For example, a conglomerate may include entities that undertake insurance activities and
banking activities, and those entities may also operate in several jurisdictions.
76

Puttable financial instruments classified as equity
IAS 1:136A For puttable financial instruments classified as equity instruments, an entity shall disclose (to the extent not disclosed
elsewhere):
IAS 1:136A(a) a) summary quantitative data about the amount classified as equity;
IAS 1:136A(b) b) its objectives, policies and processes for managing its obligation to repurchase or redeem the instruments when
required to do so by the instrument holders, including any changes from the previous period;
IAS 1:136A(c) c) the expected cash outflow on redemption or repurchase of that class of financial instruments; and
IAS 1:136A(d) d) information about how the expected cash outflow on redemption or repurchase was determined.
Other disclosures
An entity shall disclose in the notes:
IAS 1:137(a) a) the amount of dividends proposed or declared before the financial statements were authorised for issue but not
recognised as a distribution to owners during the period, and the related amount per share; and
IAS 1:137(b) b) the amount of any cumulative preference dividends not recognised.
An entity shall disclose the following, if not disclosed elsewhere in information published with the financial statements:
IAS 1:138 (a) a) the domicile and legal form of the entity, its country of incorporation and the address of its registered office (or
principal place of business, if different from the registered office);
IAS 1:138(b) b) a description of the nature of the entity’s operations and its principal activities;
IAS 1:138(c) c) the name of the parent entity and the ultimate parent of the group; and
IAS 1:138(d) d) if it is a limited life entity, information regarding the length of its life.
IAS 1:139F If the entity has applied paragraph 106A and the amended paragraphs 106 and 107 arising from Improvements to IFRSs
issued in May 2010 for an annual period beginning before 1 January 2011, it shall disclose that fact.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 2, which prescribes the
accounting treatment for inventories. The primary issues are: the costs that may be capitalised as an asset, the
subsequent recognition as an expense, including the write-down to net realisable value, and determining the cost
formulas to be used in assigning costs to inventories.
Note that the measurement requirements of IAS 2 (see Deloitte’s IFRS compliance questionnaire for details) do not apply
to inventories held by:
• producers of agricultural and forest products, agricultural produce after harvest, and minerals and mineral
products, to the extent that they are measured at net realisable value in accordance with well-established practices
in those industries; and
• commodity broker-traders who measure their inventories at fair value less costs to sell.
However, those inventories are excluded only from the measurement requirements of IAS 2 – the disclosure
requirements, as set out below, do apply.
None
At 30 September 2010, the following new Standard (issued but not yet effective) adds new paragraphs to IAS 2 or
amends existing paragraphs in IAS 2:
• IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (issued November 2009) included consequential amendments to IAS 2 (although no
amendments to disclosure requirements). The amendments are applicable for annual periods beginning on or after
1 January 2013, with earlier application permitted.
The financial statements shall disclose:
IAS 2.36(a) a) the accounting policies adopted in measuring inventories, including the cost formula used;
IAS 2.36(b) b) the total carrying amount of inventories;
IAS 2.36(b) c) the carrying amount of inventories in classifications appropriate to the entity;
IAS 2.36(c) d) the carrying amount of inventories carried at fair value less costs to sell;
IAS 2.36(d) e) the amount of inventories recognised as an expense during the period;
IAS 2.36(e) f) the amount of any write-down of inventories recognised as an expense in the period in accordance with
paragraph 34 of IAS 2;
IAS 2.36(f) g) the amount of any reversal of any write-down that is recognised as a reduction in the amount of inventories
recognised as expense in the period in accordance with paragraph 34 of IAS 2;
IAS 2.36(g) h) the circumstances or events that led to the reversal of a write-down of inventories in accordance with paragraph 34
of IAS 2; and
IAS 2.36(h) i) the carrying amount of inventories pledged as security for liabilities.
78
IAS 2 Inventories

Notes:
IAS 2.37 1) Information about the carrying amounts held in different classifications of inventories and the extent of the changes
in these assets is useful to financial statement users. Common classifications of inventories are merchandise,
production supplies, materials, work in progress and finished goods.
IAS 2.37 2) The inventories of a service provider may be described as work in progress.
IAS 2.38 3) The amount of inventories recognised as an expense during the period, which is often referred to as cost of sales,
consists of those costs previously included in the measurement of inventory that has now been sold, and
unallocated production overheads and abnormal amounts of production costs of inventories. The circumstances of
the entity may also warrant the inclusion of other amounts, such as distribution costs.
IAS 2.39 4) Some entities adopt a different format for profit or loss that results in amounts being disclosed other than the cost
of inventories recognised as an expense during the period. Under this format, an entity presents an analysis of
expenses using a classification based on the nature of expenses. In this case, the entity discloses the costs
recognised as an expense for raw materials and consumables, labour costs and other costs together with the
amount of the net change in inventories for the period.

This section of the checklist addresses IAS 7, which prescribes the manner in which a statement of cash flows should be
prepared. In particular, it specifies the treatment in the statement of cash flows of items such as interest, dividends,
taxes and the acquisition or disposal of businesses.
Under IAS 7, all entities are required to prepare a statement of cash flows as part of their IFRS financial statements.
Appendix A accompanying IAS 7 provides a number of illustrative examples of a statement of cash flows prepared in
accordance with the Standard.
The following amended paragraphs are effective for the first time for the period covered by this checklist:
• amended paragraphs 39-42 and 42A and 42B (added as a consequential amendment of IAS 27 Consolidated and
Separate Financial Statements – issued in January 2008 and effective for annual periods beginning on or
after1 July 2009);
• amended paragraph 16 (added by Improvements to IFRSs – issued in April 2009 and effective for annual period
beginning on or after 1 January 2010)
None
Requirement to present a statement of cash flows
IAS 7:1 An entity shall prepare a statement of cash flows in accordance with the requirements of IAS 7 and shall present it as an
integral part of its financial statements for each period for which financial statements are presented.
Notes:
For the purpose of preparing the statement of cash flows:
IAS 7:6 1) Cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits.
IAS 7:6 2) Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash
and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
IAS 7:7 3) Cash equivalents are held for the purpose of meeting short-term cash commitments rather than for investment or
other purposes. For an investment to qualify as a cash equivalent it must be readily convertible to a known amount
of cash and be subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. Therefore, an investment normally qualifies as a
cash equivalent only when it has a short maturity of, say, three months or less from the date of acquisition. Equity
investments are excluded from cash equivalents unless they are, in substance, cash equivalents (e.g. in the case of
preferred shares acquired within a short period of their maturity and with a specified redemption date).
4) Bank borrowings are generally considered to be financing activities. However, in some countries, bank overdrafts
which are repayable on demand form an integral part of an entity’s cash management. In these circumstances,
bank overdrafts are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents. A characteristic of such banking
arrangements is that the bank balance often fluctuates from being positive to overdrawn.
IAS 7:9 5) Cash flows exclude movements between items that constitute cash or cash equivalents because these components
are part of the cash management of an entity rather than part of its operating, investing and financing activities.
Cash management includes the investment of excess cash in cash equivalents.
Classification of cash flows
IAS 7:10 The statement of cash flows shall report cash flows during the period classified by operating, investing and financing
activities.
80
IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows

Notes:
IAS 7:11 1) An entity presents its cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities in a manner which is most
appropriate to its business. Classification by activity provides information that allows users to assess the impact
of those activities on the financial position of the entity and the amount of its cash and cash equivalents.
This information may also be used to evaluate the relationships among those activities. The definitions of operating,
investing and financing activities are set out in paragraph 6 of IAS 7. Paragraphs 13 to 17 of IAS 7 provide extensive
guidance on the appropriate classification of cash flows.
IAS 7:12 2) A single transaction may include cash flows that are classified differently. For example, when the cash repayment of
a loan includes both interest and capital, the interest element may be classified as an operating activity and the
capital element is classified as a financing activity.
Reporting cash flows from operating activities
An entity shall report cash flows from operating activities using either:
IAS 7:18(a) a) the direct method, whereby major classes of gross cash receipts and gross cash payments are disclosed; or
IAS 7:18(b) b) the indirect method, whereby profit or loss is adjusted for the effects of transactions of a non-cash nature, any
deferrals or accruals of past or future operating cash receipts or payments, and items of income or expense
associated with investing or financing cash flows.
IAS 7:19 Note: Entities are encouraged to report cash flows from operating activities using the direct method.
Reporting cash flows from investing and financing activities
IAS 7:21 An entity shall report separately major classes of gross cash receipts and gross cash payments arising from investing and
financing activities, except to the extent that the cash flows described in paragraphs 22 and 24 of IAS 7 (see below) are
reported on a net basis.
IAS 7:16 Only expenditures that result in a recognised asset in the statement of financial position are eligible for classification as
investing activities.
Reporting cash flows on a net basis
IAS 7:22 Cash flows arising from the following operating, investing or financing activities may be reported on a net basis:
IAS 7:22(a) a) cash receipts and payments on behalf of customers when the cash flows reflect the activities of the customer rather
than those of the entity; and
IAS 7:22(b) b) cash receipts and payments for items in which the turnover is quick, the amounts are large, and the maturities are short.
IAS 7:23 Notes:
1) Examples of cash receipts and payments referred to in paragraph 22(a) of IAS 7 are:
• the acceptance and repayment of demand deposits of a bank;
• funds held for customers by an investment entity; and
• rents collected on behalf of, and paid over to, the owners of properties.
IAS 7:23A 2) Examples of cash receipts and payments referred to in paragraph 22(b) of IAS 7 are advances made for, and the
repayment of:
• principal amounts relating to credit card customers;
• the purchase and sale of investments; and
• other short-term borrowings, for example, those which have a maturity period of three months or less.
IAS 7:24 3) Cash flows arising from each of the following activities of a financial institution may be reported on a net basis:
a) cash receipts and payments for the acceptance and repayment of deposits with a fixed maturity date;
b) the placement of deposits with and withdrawal of deposits from other financial institutions; and
c) cash advances and loans made to customers and the repayment of those advances and loans.

Foreign currency cash flows
IAS 7:28 The effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents held or due in a foreign currency is reported in the
statement of cash flows in order to reconcile cash and cash equivalents at the beginning and the end of the period.
IAS 7:28 Note: This amount is presented separately from cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities and
includes the differences, if any, had those cash flows been reported at end of period exchange rates.
Interest and dividends
IAS 7:31 Cash flows arising from interest and dividends received and paid shall each be disclosed separately.
IAS 7:31 Cash flows from interest and dividends received and paid shall each be classified in a consistent manner from period to
period as either operating, investing or financing activities.
Notes:
IAS 7:32 1) The total amount of interest paid during a period is disclosed in the statement of cash flows whether it has been
recognised as an expense in profit or loss or capitalised in accordance with IAS 23 Borrowing Costs.
IAS 7:33 2) Interest paid and interest and dividends received are usually classified as operating cash flows for a financial
institution. However, there is no consensus on the classification of these cash flows for other entities. Interest paid
and interest and dividends received may be classified as operating cash flows because they enter into the
determination of profit or loss. Alternatively, interest paid and interest and dividends received may be classified as
financing cash flows and investing cash flows respectively, because they are costs of obtaining financial resources
or returns on investments.
IAS 7:34 3) Dividends paid may be classified as a financing cash flow because they are a cost of obtaining financial resources.
Alternatively, dividends paid may be classified as a component of cash flows from operating activities in order to
assist users to determine the ability of an entity to pay dividends out of operating cash flows.
Taxes on income
IAS 7:35 Cash flows arising from taxes on income shall be separately disclosed.
IAS 7:35 Cash flows arising from taxes on income shall be classified as cash flows from operating activities unless they can be
specifically identified with financing and investing activities.
IAS 7:36 Notes:
IAS 7:36 1) Taxes on income arise on transactions that give rise to cash flows that are classified as operating, investing or
financing activities in a statement of cash flows. While tax expense may be readily identifiable with investing or
financing activities, the related tax cash flows are often impracticable to identify and may arise in a different period
from the cash flows of the underlying transaction. Therefore, taxes paid are usually classified as cash flows from
operating activities. However, when it is practicable to identify the tax cash flow with an individual transaction that
gives rise to cash flows that are classified as investing or financing activities, the tax cash flow is classified as an
investing or financing activity as appropriate.
IAS 7:36 2) When tax cash flows are allocated over more than one class of activity, the total amount of taxes paid is disclosed.
Investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures
IAS 7:37 When accounting for an investment in an associate or a subsidiary accounted for by the use of the equity or cost
method, an investor restricts its reporting in the statement of cash flows to the cash flows between itself and the
investee (e.g. to dividends and advances).
IAS 7:38 An entity that reports its interest in a jointly controlled entity using proportionate consolidation, includes in its
consolidated statement of cash flows its proportionate share of the jointly controlled entity's cash flows.
IAS 7:38 An entity that reports its interest in a jointly controlled entity using the equity method includes in its statement of cash
flows the cash flows in respect of its investments in the jointly controlled entity, and distributions and other payments or
receipts between it and the jointly controlled entity.
82

Changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries and other businesses
IAS 7:39 The aggregate cash flows arising from obtaining or losing control of subsidiaries or other businesses shall be presented
separately and classified as investing activities.
IAS 7:41 Note: The cash flow effects of losing control are not deducted from those of obtaining control.
IAS 7:40 An entity shall disclose, in aggregate, in respect of both obtaining and losing control of subsidiaries or other businesses
during the period, each of the following:
IAS 7:40(a) a) the total consideration paid or received;
IAS 7:40(b) b) the portion of the consideration consisting of cash and cash equivalents;
IAS 7:40(c) c) the amount of cash and cash equivalents in the subsidiaries or other businesses over which control is obtained or
lost; and
IAS 7:40(d) d) the amount of the assets and liabilities other than cash or cash equivalents in the subsidiaries or other businesses
over which control is obtained or lost, summarised by each major category.
IAS 7:42 The aggregate amount of the cash paid or received as consideration for obtaining or losing control of subsidiaries or
other businesses is reported in the statement of cash flows net of cash and cash equivalents acquired or disposed of as
part of such transactions, events or changes in circumstances.
IAS 7:42A Cash flows arising from changes in ownership interests in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control shall be
classified as cash flows from financing activities.
IAS 7:42B Cash flow arising from changes in ownership interests in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control (e.g. the
subsequent purchase or sale by a parent of a subsidiary’s equity instruments), which are accounted for as equity
transactions under IAS 27, are classified in the same way as cash flows arising from other transactions with owners
described in paragraph 17 of IAS 7.
Non-cash transactions
IAS 7:43 Investing and financing transactions that do not require the use of cash or cash equivalents shall be excluded from the
statement of cash flows.
IAS 7:43 Investing and financing transactions that do not require the use of cash or cash equivalents shall be disclosed elsewhere
in the financial statements in a way that provides all the relevant information about these investing and financing
activities.
IAS 7:44 Note: Many investing and financing activities do not have a direct impact on current cash flows although they do
affect the capital and asset structure of an entity. The exclusion of non-cash transactions from the statement of
cash flows is consistent with the objective of a statement of cash flows as these items do not involve cash flows
in the current period. Examples of non-cash transactions are:
• the acquisition of assets either by assuming directly related liabilities or by means of a finance lease;
• the acquisition of an entity by means of an equity issue; and
• the conversion of debt to equity.
Components of cash and cash equivalents
IAS 7:45 An entity shall disclose the components of cash and cash equivalents.
IAS 7:45 An entity shall present a reconciliation of the amounts for cash and cash equivalents in its statement of cash flows with
the equivalent items reported in the statement of financial position.
IAS 7:46 In order to comply with IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, an entity discloses the policy that it adopts in
determining the composition of cash and cash equivalents.
IAS 7:47 The effect of any change in the policy for determining components of cash and cash equivalents (e.g. a change in the
classification of financial instruments previously considered to be part of an entity’s investment portfolio), is reported in
accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.

Other disclosures
IAS 7:48 An entity shall disclose, together with a commentary by management, the amount of significant cash and cash
equivalent balances held by the entity that are not available for use by the group.
IAS 7:49 Note: Examples include cash and cash equivalent balances held by a subsidiary that operates in a country where
exchange controls or other legal restrictions apply when the balances are not available for general use by the
parent or other subsidiaries.
IAS 7:50 The entity is encouraged to disclose additional information that may be relevant to users in understanding the financial
position and liquidity of the entity, together with a commentary by management.
IAS 7:50 Note: Such disclosures may include:
• the amount of undrawn borrowing facilities that may be available for future operating activities and to
settle capital commitments, indicating any restrictions on the use of these facilities;
• the aggregate amounts of the cash flows from each of operating, investing and financing activities related
to interests in joint ventures reported using proportionate consolidation;
• the aggregate amount of cash flows that represent increases in operating capacity separately from those
cash flows that are required to maintain operating capacity; and
• the amount of the cash flows arising from the operating, investing and financing activities of each
reportable segment (see IFRS 8, Operating Segments).
84

criteria for selecting and changing accounting policies, together with the accounting treatment and disclosure of
changes in accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and corrections of errors.
The paragraphs below list the disclosures required for changes in accounting policies, changes in estimates and
corrections of errors in the period. Refer to IAS 8, and the relevant sections of Deloitte’s IFRS compliance questionnaire,
for the circumstances in which such changes and corrections are permitted, and the required accounting treatment.
Disclosure requirements for accounting policies, except those for changes in accounting policies, are set out in IAS 1
Presentation of Financial Statements (see relevant section of this checklist).
The Implementation Guidance accompanying IAS 8 provides illustrations of the retrospective restatement of errors, and
the retrospective and prospective application of changes in accounting policies.
None
Disclosure of changes in accounting policies
When initial application of an IFRS has an effect on the current period or any prior period, would have such an effect
except that it is impracticable to determine the amount of the adjustment, or might have an effect on future periods, an
entity shall disclose:
IAS 8:28(a) a) the title of the IFRS;
IAS 8:28(b) b) when applicable, that the change in accounting policy has been made in accordance with its transitional provisions;
IAS 8:28(c) c) the nature of the change in accounting policy;
IAS 8:28(d) d) when applicable, a description of the transitional provisions;
IAS 8:28(e) e) when applicable, the transitional provisions that might have an effect on future periods;
IAS 8:28(f) f) for the current period and each prior period presented, to the extent practicable, the amount of the adjustment:
i) for each financial statement line item affected; and
ii) if IAS 33 Earnings per Share applies to the entity, for basic and diluted earnings per share;
IAS 8:28(g) g) the amount of the adjustment relating to periods before those presented, to the extent practicable; and
IAS 8:28(h) h) if retrospective application required by paragraph 19(a) or (b) of IAS 8 is impracticable for a particular prior period,
or for periods before those presented, the circumstances that led to the existence of that condition and a
description of how and from when the change in accounting policy has been applied.
IAS 8:28 Note: Financial statements of subsequent periods need not repeat the disclosures required by paragraph 28 of IAS 8.
When a voluntary change in accounting policy has an effect on the current period or any prior period, would have an
effect on that period except that it is impracticable to determine the amount of the adjustment, or might have an effect
on future periods, an entity shall disclose:
IAS 8:29(a) a) the nature of the change in accounting policy;
IAS 8:29(b) b) the reasons why applying the new accounting policy provides reliable and more relevant information;
85
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors

IAS 8:29(c) c) for the current period and each prior period presented, to the extent practicable, the amount of the adjustment:
IAS 8:29(d) d) the amount of the adjustment relating to periods before those presented, to the extent practicable; and
IAS 8:29(e) e) if retrospective application is impracticable for a particular prior period, or for periods before those presented, the
circumstances that led to the existence of that condition and a description of how and from when the change in
accounting policy has been applied.
Standards or Interpretations in issue but not yet effective
When an entity has not applied a new IFRS that has been issued but is not yet effective, the entity shall disclose:
IAS 8:30(a) a) this fact; and
IAS 8:30(b) b) known or reasonably estimable information relevant to assessing the possible impact that application of the new
IFRS will have on the entity’s financial statements in the period of initial application.
IAS 8:31 Note: In complying with paragraph 30 of IAS 8, an entity considers disclosing:
a) the title of the new IFRS;
b) the nature of the impending change or changes in accounting policy;
c) the date by which application of the IFRS is required;
d) the date as at which it plans to apply the IFRS initially; and
e) either:
i) a discussion of the impact that initial application of the IFRS is expected to have on the entity’s
financial statements; or
ii) if that impact is not known or reasonably estimable, a statement to that effect.
Disclosing the effect of a change in accounting estimate
IAS 8:39 An entity shall disclose the nature and amount of a change in an accounting estimate that has an effect in the current
period or which is expected to have an effect in future periods, except for the disclosure of the effect on future periods
when it is impracticable to estimate that effect.
IAS 8:40 If the amount of the effect in future periods is not disclosed because estimating it is impracticable, the entity shall
disclose that fact.
IAS 34:26 If an estimate of an amount reported in an interim period changed significantly during the final interim period of the
financial year, but a separate financial report is not published for that final interim period, the entity shall disclose the
nature and amount of that change in estimate in a note to the annual financial statements for that financial year.
IAS 34:27 Note: The disclosure required by paragraph 26 of IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting is consistent with the IAS 8
requirement and is intended to be narrow in scope – relating only to the change in estimate. An entity is not
required to include additional interim period financial information in its annual financial statements.
86

Disclosure of prior period errors
Notes:
IAS 8:5 1) Prior period errors are omissions from, and misstatements in, the entity’s financial statements for one or more prior
periods arising from a failure to use, or misuse of, reliable information that:
• was available when financial statements for those periods were authorised for issue; and
• could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account in the preparation and presentation
of those financial statements.
Such errors include the effects of mathematical mistakes, mistakes in applying accounting policies, oversights or
misinterpretations of facts, and fraud.
IAS 8:48 2) Corrections of errors are distinguished from changes in accounting estimates (see above). Accounting estimates, by
their nature, are approximations that may need revision as additional information becomes known. For example,
the gain or loss recognised on the outcome of a contingency is not the correction of an error.
In correcting prior period errors, the entity shall disclose the following:
IAS 8:49(a) a) the nature of the prior period error;
IAS 8:49(b) b) for each prior period presented, to the extent practicable, the amount of the correction:
IAS 8:49(c) c) the amount of the correction at the beginning of the earliest prior period presented; and
IAS 8:49(d) d) if retrospective restatement is impracticable for a particular prior period, the circumstances that led to the existence
of that condition and a description of how and from when the error has been corrected.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 10, which prescribes when
an entity should adjust its financial statements for events occurring after the reporting period, and the disclosures that
an entity should give about the date when the financial statements were authorised for issue and about events after
the reporting period. The principal issue is determining whether an event after the reporting period is an adjusting or a
non-adjusting event.
Events after the reporting period are defined as those events, both favourable and unfavourable, that occur between
the end of the reporting period and the date when the financial statements are authorised for issue. IAS 10
distinguishes two types of events:
• adjusting events – those that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period; and
• non-adjusting events – those that are indicative of conditions that arose after the reporting period.
None
None
Dividends
IAS 10:13 If dividends are declared (i.e. the dividends are appropriately authorised and are no longer at the discretion of the entity)
after the reporting period but before the financial statements are authorised for issue, such dividends are disclosed in the
notes in accordance with IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements.
Notes:
IAS 10:12, 13 1) If an entity declares dividends to holders of equity instruments (as defined in IAS 32 Financial Instruments:
Presentation) after the reporting period, the entity shall not recognise those dividends as a liability at the end of the
reporting period because no obligation exists at that time.
IAS 1:137(a) 2) IAS 1 requires an entity to disclose the amount of dividends proposed or declared before the financial statements
were authorised for issue but not recognised as a distribution to owners during the period, and the related amount
per share.
Going concern
IAS 1 specifies required disclosures if:
IAS 10:16(a) a) the financial statements are not prepared on a going concern basis; or
IAS 10:16(b) b) management is aware of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon
the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Notes:
1) Refer to the requirements of paragraph 25 of IAS 1 in the relevant section of this checklist.
IAS 10:16 2) The events or conditions prompting disclosure under paragraph 25 of IAS 1 may arise after the reporting period.
IAS 10:14,15 3) An entity shall not prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis if management determines after the
reporting period either that it intends to liquidate the entity or to cease trading, or that it has no realistic alternative
but to do so. Deterioration in operating results and financial position after the reporting period may indicate a need
to consider whether the going concern assumption is still appropriate. If the going concern assumption is no longer
appropriate, the effect is so pervasive that IAS 10 requires a fundamental change in the basis of accounting, rather
than adjustments to the amounts recognised within the original basis of accounting.
Date of authorisation for issue
IAS 10:17 An entity shall disclose the date when the financial statements were authorised for issue and who gave that
authorisation.
88
IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period

IAS 10:17 If the entity’s owners or others have the power to amend the financial statements after issuance, the entity shall disclose
that fact.
Updating disclosures about conditions at the end of the reporting period
IAS 10:19 If an entity receives information after the reporting period about conditions that existed at the end of the reporting
period, it shall update disclosures that relate to those conditions, in the light of the new information.
IAS 10:20 Note: In some cases, an entity needs to update the disclosures in its financial statements to reflect information
received after the reporting period, even when the information does not affect the amounts that it recognises
in its financial statements. One example of the need to update disclosures is when evidence becomes available
after the reporting period about a contingent liability that existed at the end of the reporting period. In addition
to considering whether it should recognise or change a provision under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities
and Contingent Assets, an entity updates its disclosures about the contingent liability in the light of that
evidence.
Non-adjusting events after the reporting period
An entity shall disclose the following information for each material category of non-adjusting event after the reporting
period:
IAS 10:21(a) a) the nature of the event; and
IAS 10:21(b) b) an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made.
Notes:
IAS 10:10 1) An entity shall not adjust the amounts recognised in its financial statements to reflect non-adjusting events after the
reporting period.
IAS 10:22 2) The following are examples of non-adjusting events after the reporting period that would generally result in
disclosure:
a) a major business combination after the reporting period (IFRS 3 Business Combinations requires specific
disclosures in such cases – see relevant section of this checklist) or disposing of a major subsidiary;
b) announcing a plan to discontinue an operation;
c) major purchases of assets, classification of assets as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets
Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, other disposals of assets, or expropriation of major assets by
government; the destruction of a major production plant by a fire after the reporting period;
d) announcing, or commencing the implementation of, a major restructuring (see IAS 37);
e) major ordinary share transactions and potential ordinary share transactions after the reporting period (IAS 33
Earnings per Share requires an entity to disclose a description of such transactions, other than when such
transactions involve capitalisation or bonus issues, share splits or reverse share splits, all of which are required
to be adjusted under IAS 33);
f) abnormally large changes after the reporting period in asset prices or foreign exchange rates;
g) changes in tax rates or tax laws enacted or announced after the reporting period that have a significant effect
on current and deferred tax assets and liabilities (see IAS 12 Income Taxes);
h) entering into significant commitments or contingent liabilities, for example, by issuing significant guarantees;
and
i) commencing major litigation arising solely out of events that occurred after the reporting period.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 11, which should be applied
in accounting for construction contracts in the financial statements of contractors. A construction contract is defined
as a contract specifically negotiated for the construction of an asset or a combination of assets that are closely
interrelated or interdependent in terms of their design, technology and function or their ultimate purpose or use.
The term contractor is not defined.
The examples accompanying IAS 11 illustrate the disclosures required by the Standard.
None
None
IAS 11:39(a) a) the amount of contract revenue recognised as revenue in the period;
IAS 11:39(b) b) the methods used to determine the contract revenue recognised in the period; and
IAS 11:39(c) c) the methods used to determine the stage of completion of contracts in progress.
An entity shall disclose each of the following for contracts in progress at the end of the reporting period:
IAS 11:40(a) a) the aggregate amount of costs incurred and recognised profits (less recognised losses) to date;
IAS 11:40(b) b) the amount of advances received; and
IAS 11:40(c) c) the amount of retentions.
Notes:
IAS 11:41 1) Advances are amounts received by the contractor before the related work is performed.
2) Retentions are amounts of progress billings that are not paid until the satisfaction of conditions specified in the
contract for the payment of such amounts or until defects have been rectified.
3) Progress billings are amounts billed for work performed on a contract whether or not they have been paid by the
customer.
An entity shall present:
IAS 11:42(a) a) the gross amount due from customers for contract work as an asset; and
IAS 11:42(b) b) the gross amount due to customers for contract work as a liability.
Notes:
IAS 11:43 1) The gross amount due from customers for contract work is the net amount of:
a) costs incurred plus recognised profits; less
b) the sum of recognised losses and progress billings
for all contracts in progress for which costs incurred plus recognised profits (less recognised losses) exceeds
progress billings
90
IAS 11 Construction Contracts

IAS 11:44 2) The gross amount due to customers for contract work is the net amount of:
a) costs incurred plus recognised profits; less
b) the sum of recognised losses and progress billings
for all contracts in progress for which progress billings exceed costs incurred plus recognised profits (less
recognised losses).
IAS 11:45 An entity discloses any contingent liabilities and contingent assets in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets, which may arise from such items as warranty costs, claims, penalties or possible losses.

accounting treatment for income taxes.
For the purposes of IAS 12, income taxes include all domestic and foreign taxes that are based on taxable profits.
Income taxes also include taxes, such as withholding taxes, that are payable by a subsidiary, associate or joint venture
on distributions to the reporting entity. Taxes that are based on some other variable (e.g. revenue or salaries) are
excluded from the scope of IAS 12.
Appendix B to IAS 12 illustrates the Standard’s presentation and disclosure requirements.
• amended paragraphs 81(j) and 81(k) (amended as a consequential amendment of IFRS 3 Business Combinations –
issued in January 2008 and effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after 1 July 2009)
At 30 September 2010 the following new Standard (issued but not yet effective) adds new paragraphs to IAS 12 or
Presentation
Offset of tax assets and liabilities
IAS 12:71 An entity shall offset current tax assets and current tax liabilities if, and only if, the entity:
a) has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts; and
b) intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Notes:
IAS 12:72 1) Although current tax assets and liabilities are separately recognised and measured, they are offset in the statement
of financial position subject to criteria similar to those established for financial instruments in IAS 32 Financial
Instruments: Presentation. An entity will normally have a legally enforceable right to set off a current tax asset
against a current tax liability when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the
taxation authority permits the entity to make or receive a single net payment.
IAS 12:73 2) In consolidated financial statements, a current tax asset of one entity in a group is offset against a current tax
liability of another entity in the group if, and only if, the entities concerned have a legally enforceable right to make
or receive a single net payment and the entities intend to make or receive such a net payment or to recover the
asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
An entity shall offset deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities if, and only if:
IAS 12:74(a) a) there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities (see above); and
IAS 12:74(b) b) the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on
either:
i) the same taxable entity; or
ii) different taxable entities which intend either to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis, or to realise
the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously, in each future period in which significant amounts of deferred
tax liabilities or assets are expected to be settled or recovered.
92
IAS 12 Income Taxes

Notes:
IAS 12:75 1) To avoid the need for detailed scheduling of the timing of the reversal of each temporary difference, IAS 12 requires
an entity to set off a deferred tax asset against a deferred tax liability of the same taxable entity if, and only if, they
relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the entity has a legally enforceable right to set off
current tax assets against current tax liabilities.
IAS 12:76 2) In rare circumstances, an entity may have a legally enforceable right of set-off, and an intention to settle net, for
some periods but not for others. In such rare circumstances, detailed scheduling may be required to establish
reliably whether the deferred tax liability of one taxable entity will result in increased tax payments in the same
period in which a deferred tax asset of another taxable entity will result in decreased payments by that second
taxable entity.
Tax expense
IAS 12:77 The tax expense (income) related to profit or loss from ordinary activities shall be presented in the statement of
comprehensive income.
IAS 12:77A If an entity presents the components of profit or loss in a separate income statement as described in paragraph 81 of
IAS 1, it presents the tax expense (income) related to profit or loss from ordinary activities in that separate statement.
IAS 12:78 Where exchange differences on deferred foreign tax liabilities or assets are recognised in the statement of
comprehensive income, such differences may be classified as deferred tax expense (income) if that presentation is
considered to be the most useful to financial statement users.
IAS 12:78 Note: IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates requires certain exchange differences to be recognised
as income or expense but does not specify where such differences should be presented in the statement of
Disclosure
IAS 12:79 The major components of tax expense (income) shall be separately disclosed.
IAS 12:80 Note: Components of tax expense (income) may include:
a) current tax expense (income);
b) any adjustments recognised in the period for current tax of prior periods;
c) the amount of deferred tax expense (income) relating to the origination and reversal of temporary
differences;
d) the amount of deferred tax expense (income) relating to changes in tax rates or the imposition of new
taxes;
e) the amount of the benefit arising from a previously unrecognised tax loss, tax credit or temporary
difference of a prior period that is used to reduce current tax expense;
f) the amount of the benefit from a previously unrecognised tax loss, tax credit or temporary difference of a
prior period that is used to reduce deferred tax expense;
g) deferred tax expense arising from the write-down, or reversal of a previous write-down, of a deferred tax
asset in accordance with paragraph 56 of IAS 12; and
h) the amount of tax expense (income) relating to those changes in accounting policies and errors that are
included in profit or loss in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates
and Errors because they cannot be accounted for retrospectively.
The following shall also be disclosed separately:
IAS 12:81(a) a) the aggregate current and deferred tax relating to items that are charged or credited directly to equity (see
paragraph 62A of IAS 12);
IAS 12:81(ab) b) the amount of income tax relating to each component of other comprehensive income (see paragraph 62 of IAS 12
and IAS 1);

IAS 12:81(c) c) an explanation of the relationship between tax expense (income) and accounting profit in either or both of the
following forms:
i) a numerical reconciliation between tax expense (income) and the product of accounting profit multiplied by the
applicable tax rate(s), disclosing also the basis on which the applicable tax rate(s) is (are) computed; or
ii) a numerical reconciliation between the average effective tax rate and the applicable tax rate, disclosing also the
basis on which the applicable tax rate is computed;
IAS 12:84 Notes:
IAS 12:86 1) The average effective tax rate is the tax expense (income) divided by the accounting profit.
IAS 12:84 2) The disclosures required by paragraph 81(c) of IAS 12 (see above) enable users of financial statements to
understand whether the relationship between tax expense (income) and accounting profit is unusual and to
understand the significant factors that could affect that relationship in the future. The relationship between tax
expense (income) and accounting profit may be affected by such factors as revenue that is exempt from
taxation, expenses that are not deductible in determining taxable profit (tax loss), the effect of tax losses and
the effect of foreign tax rates.
IAS 12:85 3) In explaining the relationship between tax expense (income) and accounting profit, an entity uses an applicable
tax rate that provides the most meaningful information to the users of its financial statements. Often, the most
meaningful rate is the domestic rate of tax in the country in which the entity is domiciled, aggregating the tax
rate applied for national taxes with the rates applied for any local taxes which are computed on a substantially
similar level of taxable profit (tax loss). However, for an entity operating in several jurisdictions, it may be more
meaningful to aggregate separate reconciliations prepared using the domestic rate in each individual
jurisdiction. Paragraph 85 of IAS 12 includes an example that illustrates how the selection of the applicable tax
rate affects the presentation of the numerical reconciliation.
IAS 12:81(d) d) an explanation of changes in the applicable tax rate(s) compared to the previous accounting period;
IAS 12:81(e) e) the amount (and expiry date, if any) of deductible temporary differences, unused tax losses, and unused tax credits
for which no deferred tax asset is recognised in the statement of financial position;
IAS 12:81(f) f) the aggregate amount of temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, branches and associates,
and interests in joint ventures, for which deferred tax liabilities have not been recognised (see paragraph 39 of IAS 12);
IAS 12:87 Note: It would often be impracticable to compute the amount of unrecognised deferred tax liabilities arising from
investments in subsidiaries, branches and associates, and interests in joint ventures (see paragraph 39 of
IAS 12). Therefore, IAS 12 requires an entity to disclose the aggregate amount of the underlying temporary
differences but does not require disclosure of the deferred tax liabilities. Nevertheless, where practicable,
entities are encouraged to disclose the amounts of the unrecognised deferred tax liabilities because
financial statement users may find such information useful.
IAS 12:81(g) g) in respect of each type of temporary difference, and in respect of each type of unused tax losses and unused tax
credits:
i) the amount of the deferred tax assets and liabilities recognised in the statement of financial position for each
period presented; and
ii) the amount of the deferred tax income or expense recognised in profit or loss, if this is not apparent from the
changes in the amounts recognised in the statement of financial position;
IAS 12:81(h) h) in respect of discontinued operations, the tax expense relating to:
i) the gain or loss on discontinuance; and
ii) the profit or loss from the ordinary activities of the discontinued operation for the period, together with the
corresponding amounts for each prior period presented;
IAS 12:81(i) i) the amount of income tax consequences of dividends to shareholders of the entity that were proposed or declared
before the financial statements were authorised for issue, but are not recognised as a liability in the financial
statements;
IAS 12:81(j) j) if a business combination in which the entity is the acquirer causes a change in the amount recognised for its
pre-acquisition deferred tax asset (see paragraph 67 of IAS 12), the amount of that change; and
94

IAS 12:81(k) k) if the deferred tax benefits acquired in a business combination are not recognised at the acquisition date but are
recognised after the acquisition date (see paragraph 68 of IAS 12), a description of the event or change in
circumstances that caused the deferred tax benefits to be recognised.
IAS 12:82(a) Where the utilisation of a deferred tax asset is dependent on future taxable profits in excess of the profits arising from
the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, an entity shall disclose the amount of the deferred tax asset and
the nature of the evidence supporting its recognition.
IAS 12:82(b) Where the entity has suffered a loss in either the current or preceding period in the tax jurisdiction to which a deferred
tax asset relates, the entity shall disclose the amount of the deferred tax asset and the nature of the evidence supporting
its recognition.
IAS 12:82A Where the circumstances described in paragraph 52A of IAS 12 apply (see below), the entity shall disclose:
a) the nature of the potential income tax consequences that would result from the payment of dividends to its
shareholders;
b) the amounts of the potential income tax consequences practicably determinable and whether there are any
potential income tax consequences not practicably determinable; and
IAS 12:87A c) the important features of the income tax systems and the factors that will affect the amount of the potential income
tax consequences of dividends.
IAS 12:87B If applicable, the entity also discloses that there are additional potential income tax consequences not practicably
determinable.
Notes:
IAS 12:52A 1) Paragraph 52A of IAS 12 discusses the circumstances in some jurisdictions where income taxes are payable at a
higher or lower rate if part or all of the net profit or retained earnings is paid out as a dividend to shareholders of
the entity, and jurisdictions where income taxes may be refundable or payable if part or all of the net profit or
retained earnings is paid out as a dividend to shareholders of the entity. In these circumstances, current and
deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rate applicable to undistributed profits.
IAS 12:87B 2) It would sometimes not be practicable to compute the total amount of the potential income tax consequences that
would result from the payment of dividends to shareholders. This may be the case, for example, where an entity
has a large number of foreign subsidiaries. However, even in such circumstances, some portions of the total
amount may be easily determinable. For example, in a consolidated group, a parent and some of its subsidiaries
may have paid income taxes at a higher rate on undistributed profits and be aware of the amount that would be
refunded on the payment of future dividends to shareholders from consolidated retained earnings. In this case, that
refundable amount is disclosed. In the parent’s separate financial statements, if any, the disclosure of the potential
income tax consequences relates to the parent’s retained earnings.
IAS 12:87C 3) An entity required to provide the disclosures in paragraph 82A of IAS 12 (see above) may also be required to
provide disclosures related to temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, branches and
associates or interests in joint ventures. In such cases, an entity considers this in determining the information to be
disclosed under paragraph 82A of IAS 12 (see above). For example, an entity may be required to disclose the
aggregate amount of temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries for which no deferred tax
liabilities have been recognised (see paragraph 81(f) of IAS 12 (see above)). If it is impracticable to compute the
amounts of unrecognised deferred tax liabilities (see paragraph 87 of IAS 12) there may be amounts of potential
income tax consequences of dividends not practicably determinable related to these subsidiaries.
IAS 12:88 An entity discloses any tax-related contingent liabilities and contingent assets in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Assets and Contingent Liabilities.
Note: Contingent liabilities and contingent assets may arise, for example, from unresolved disputes with the taxation
authorities.
IAS 12:88 Where changes in tax rates or tax laws are enacted or announced after the reporting period, an entity discloses any
significant effect of those changes on its current and deferred tax assets and liabilities, in accordance with the general
principles of IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period.

accounting treatment for property, plant and equipment. The principal issues in accounting for property, plant and
equipment are: the recognition of assets, the determination of their carrying amounts and the recognition of
depreciation charges and impairment losses.
None
None
General disclosures
The financial statements shall disclose, for each class of property, plant and equipment:
IAS 16:73(a) a) the measurement bases used for determining the gross carrying amount;
IAS 16:73(b) b) the depreciation methods used;
IAS 16:73(c) c) the useful lives or the depreciation rates used;
IAS 16:73(d) d) the gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation (aggregated with accumulated impairment losses) at
the beginning and end of the period;
IAS 16:73(e) e) a reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period showing:
i) additions;
ii) assets classified as held for sale or included in a disposal group classified as held for sale in accordance with
IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations and other disposals;
iii) acquisitions through business combinations;
iv) increases or decreases resulting from revaluations under paragraphs 31, 39 and 40 of IAS 16 and from
impairment losses recognised or reversed in other comprehensive income under IAS 36 Impairment of Assets;
v) impairment losses recognised in profit or loss in accordance with IAS 36;
vi) impairment losses reversed in profit or loss in accordance with IAS 36;
vii) depreciation;
viii) the net exchange differences arising on the translation of the financial statements from the functional currency
into a different presentation currency, including the translation of a foreign operation into the presentation
currency of the reporting entity; and
ix) other changes.
IAS 16:75 Note: Selection of the depreciation method and estimation of the useful life of assets are matters of judgement.
Therefore, disclosure of the methods adopted and the estimated useful lives or depreciation rates provides
users of financial statements with information that allows them to review the policies selected by management
and enables comparisons to be made with other entities. For similar reasons, it is necessary to disclose:
a) depreciation, whether recognised in profit or loss or as part of the cost of other assets, during a period;
and
b) accumulated depreciation at the end of the period.
The financial statements shall also disclose:
IAS 16:74(a) a) the existence and amounts of restrictions on title, and property, plant and equipment pledged as security for
liabilities;
IAS 16:74(b) b) the amount of expenditures recognised in the carrying amount of an item of property, plant and equipment in the
course of its construction;
96
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment

IAS 16:74(c) c) the amount of contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment; and
IAS 16:74(d) d) if it is not disclosed separately in the statement of comprehensive income, the amount of compensation from third
parties for items of property, plant and equipment that were impaired, lost or given up that is included in profit or
loss.
IAS 16:76 An entity shall disclose the nature and effect of any change in an accounting estimate relating to property, plant and
equipment that has an effect in the current period or is expected to have an effect in subsequent periods, in accordance
with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.
IAS 16:76 Note: Such disclosure may arise from changes in estimate with respect to:
• residual values;
• the estimated costs of dismantling, removing and restoring items of property, plant or equipment;
• useful lives; and
• depreciation methods.
Assets carried at revalued amounts
If items of property, plant and equipment are stated at revalued amounts, the following shall be disclosed:
IAS 16:77(a) a) the effective date of the revaluation;
IAS 16:77(b) b) whether an independent valuer was involved;
IAS 16:77(c) c) the methods and significant assumptions applied in estimating the items’ fair values;
IAS 16:77(d) d) the extent to which the items’ fair values were determined directly by reference to observable prices in an active
market or recent market transactions on arm’s length terms or were estimated using other valuation techniques;
IAS 16:77(e) e) for each revalued class of property, plant and equipment, the carrying amount that would have been recognised had
the assets been carried under the cost model; and
IAS 16:77(f) f) the revaluation surplus, indicating the change for the period and any restrictions on the distribution of the balance
to shareholders.
IAS 16:42 The effects of taxes on income, if any, resulting from the revaluation of property, plant and equipment are recognised
and disclosed in accordance with IAS 12 Income Taxes.
Impairment
IAS 16:78 In accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, in addition to the information required by paragraph 73(e)(iv) to (vi) of
IAS 16 (see above), an entity discloses information on impaired property, plant and equipment.
Presentation of gains and losses arising on derecognition
IAS 16:68 The gain or loss arising from the derecognition of an item of property, plant and equipment shall be included in profit or
loss when the item is derecognised (unless IAS 17 Leases requires otherwise on a sale and leaseback).
IAS 16:68 Gains arising from the derecognition of an item of property, plant and equipment shall not be classified as revenue.
IAS 16:68A The proceeds from the sale of items of property, plant and equipment that an entity has held for rental to others
and that it routinely sells in the course of its ordinary activities shall be recognised as revenue in accordance with
IAS 18 Revenue.
Additional encouraged disclosures
Entities are encouraged (but not required) to disclose the following amounts:
IAS 16:79(a) a) the carrying amount of temporarily idle property, plant and equipment;
IAS 16:79(b) b) the gross carrying amount of any fully depreciated property, plant and equipment that is still in use;
IAS 16:79(c) c) the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment retired from active use and not classified as held for sale in
accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations; and
IAS 16:79(d) d) when the cost model is used, the fair value of property, plant and equipment when this is materially different from
the carrying amount.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 17, which deals with the
accounting for leases from both the perspective of the lessee and lessor.
None
None
Financial statements of lessees
Finance leases
IAS 17:23 It is not appropriate for the liabilities for leased assets to be presented in the financial statements as a deduction from
the leased assets.
IAS 17:23 If for the presentation of liabilities in the statement of financial position a distinction is made between current and non-
current liabilities, the same distinction is made for lease liabilities.
Lessees shall, in addition to meeting the requirements of IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, make the following
disclosures for finance leases:
IAS 17:31(a) a) for each class of asset, the net carrying amount at the end of the reporting period;
IAS 17:31(b) b) a reconciliation between the total of future minimum lease payments at the end of the reporting period, and their
present value;
IAS 17:31(b) c) the total of future minimum lease payments at the end of the reporting period, and their present value, for each of
the following periods:
i) not later than one year;
ii) later than one year and not later than five years;
iii) later than five years;
IAS 17:31(c) d) contingent rents recognised as an expense for the period;
IAS 17:31(d) e) the total of future minimum sublease payments expected to be received under non-cancellable subleases at the end
of the reporting period; and
IAS 17:31(e) f) a general description of the lessee’s material leasing arrangements including, but not limited to, the following:
i) the basis on which contingent rent payable is determined;
ii) the existence and terms of renewal or purchase options and escalation clauses; and
iii) restrictions imposed by lease arrangements, such as those concerning dividends, additional debt, and further
leasing.
IAS 17:32 In addition, the requirements for disclosure under IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment, IAS 36 Impairment of Assets,
IAS 38 Intangible Assets, IAS 40 Investment Property and IAS 41 Agriculture apply to lessees for leased assets under
finance leases.
Operating leases
Lessees shall, in addition to meeting the requirements of IFRS 7 make the following disclosures for operating leases:
IAS 17:35(a) a) the total of future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases for each of the following
periods:
98
IAS 17 Leases

IAS 17:35(b) b) the total of future minimum sublease payments expected to be received under non-cancellable subleases at the end
of the reporting period;
IAS 17:35(c) c) lease and sublease payments recognised as an expense for the period, with separate amounts for minimum lease
payments, contingent rents, and sublease payments; and
IAS 17:35(d) d) a general description of the lessee’s significant leasing arrangements including, but not limited to, the following:
i) the basis on which contingent rent payable is determined;
ii) the existence and terms of renewal or purchase options and escalation clauses; and
iii) restrictions imposed by lease arrangements, such as those concerning dividends, additional debt, and further
leasing.
Financial statements of lessors
Finance leases
IAS 17:36 Lessors shall recognise assets held under a finance lease in their statements of financial position and present them as a
receivable at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease.
Lessors shall, in addition to meeting the requirements of IFRS 7 disclose the following for finance leases:
IAS 17:47(a) a) a reconciliation between the gross investment in the lease at the end of the reporting period, and the present value
of minimum lease payments receivable at the end of the reporting period;
IAS 17:47(a) b) the gross investment in the lease and the present value of minimum lease payments receivable at the end of the
reporting period, for each of the following periods:
IAS 17:47(b) c) unearned finance income;
IAS 17:47(c) d) the unguaranteed residual values accruing to the benefit of the lessor;
IAS 17:47(d) e) the accumulated allowance for uncollectible minimum lease payments receivable;
IAS 17:47(e) f) contingent rents recognised as income in the period; and
IAS 17:47(f) g) a general description of the lessor’s material leasing arrangements.
IAS 17:48 As an indicator of growth, it is often useful also to disclose the gross investment less unearned income in new business
added during the accounting period, after deducting the relevant amounts for cancelled leases.
Note: This disclosure is recommended but not required.
Operating leases
IAS 17:49 Lessors shall present assets subject to operating leases in their statements of financial position according to the nature of
the asset.
Lessors shall, in addition to meeting the requirements of IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, disclose the following
for operating leases:
IAS 17:56(a) a) the future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases in aggregate
IAS 17:56(a) b) the future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases for each of the following periods;
IAS 17:56(b) c) total contingent rents recognised as income in the period; and
IAS 17:56(c) d) a general description of the lessor’s leasing arrangements.

100
IAS 17:57 In addition, the requirements for disclosure under IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment, IAS 36 Impairment of Assets,
IAS 38 Intangible Assets, IAS 40 Investment Property and IAS 41 Agriculture apply to lessors for assets provided under
operating leases.
Sale and leaseback transactions
IAS 17:65 The disclosure requirements for lessees and lessors set out above apply equally to sale and leaseback arrangements.
IAS 17:66 Notes:
IAS 17:65 1) The required description of the material leasing arrangements leads to disclosure of unique or unusual provisions of
the agreement or terms of the sale and leaseback transactions.
IAS 17:66 2) Sale and leaseback transactions may trigger the separate disclosure criteria in IAS 1, Presentation of Financial
Statements.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 18. Revenue is income that
arises in the course of the ordinary activities of an entity and is referred to by a variety of different names including
sales, fees, interest, dividends and royalties. The primary issue in accounting for revenue is determining when to
recognise revenue.
None
IAS 18:35(a) a) the accounting policies adopted for the recognition of revenue, including the methods adopted to determine the
stage of completion of transactions involving the rendering of services;
IAS 18:35(b) b) the amount of each significant category of revenue recognised during the period, including revenue arising from:
i) the sale of goods;
ii) the rendering of services;
iii) interest;
iv) royalties;
v) dividends; and
IAS 18:35(c) c) the amount of revenue arising from exchanges of goods or services included in each significant category of revenue.
IAS 18:36 An entity discloses any contingent liabilities and contingent assets in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
IAS 18:36 Note: Contingent liabilities and contingent assets may arise from items such as warranty costs, claims, penalties or
possible losses.
101
IAS 18 Revenue

accounting for employee benefits. The principal issues relate to the determination of employee benefit liabilities, assets
and expenses for short-term and long-term employee benefits.
IAS 19 applies to all employee benefits, except those that fall within the scope of IFRS 2 Share-based Payment.
Appendix B to IAS 19 illustrates the disclosures required by the Standard.
None
None
Short-term employee benefits
IAS 19:23 Although IAS 19 does not require specific disclosures about short-term employee benefits, other Standards may require
disclosures (e.g. IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures requires an entity to disclose information about employee benefits for
key management personnel and IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements requires that an entity shall disclose its
employee benefits expense).
Post-employment benefits – multi-employer plans
IAS 19:29(b) Where a multi-employer plan is a defined benefit plan, an entity shall disclose the information required by paragraph 120A
of IAS 19 (see below).
IAS 19:30 When sufficient information is not available to use defined benefit accounting for a multi-employer plan that is a defined
benefit plan, and the entity has accounted for the plan under paragraphs 44 to 46 of IAS 19 as if it were a defined
contribution plan, the entity shall disclose:
IAS 19:30(b) a) the fact that the plan is a defined benefit plan;
IAS 19:30(b) b) the reason why sufficient information is not available to enable the entity to account for the plan as a defined
benefit plan; and
IAS 19:30(c) c) to the extent that a surplus or deficit in the plan may affect the amount of future contributions:
i) any available information about that surplus or deficit;
ii) the basis used to determine that surplus or deficit; and
iii) the implications, if any, for the entity.
IAS 19:32B An entity is required to disclose information about certain contingent liabilities under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
IAS 19:32B Note: In the context of a multi-employer plan, a contingent liability may arise from, for example:
• actuarial losses relating to other participating entities because each entity that participates in a multi-
employer plan shares in the actuarial risks of every other participating entity; or
• any responsibility under the terms of a plan to finance any shortfall in the plan if other entities cease to
participate.
Defined benefit plans that share risks between various entities under common control
An entity that participates in a defined benefit plan that shares risks between various entities under common control
(e.g. a parent and its subsidiaries) shall, in its separate or individual financial statements, make the following disclosures:
IAS 19:34B(a) a) the contractual agreement or stated policy for charging the net benefit cost or the fact that there is no such policy;
IAS 19:34B(b) b) the policy for determining the contribution to be paid by the entity;
IAS 19:34B(c) c) if the entity accounts for an allocation of the net defined benefit cost in accordance with paragraph 34A of IAS 19,
all the information about the plan as a whole in accordance with paragraphs 120 to 121 of IAS 19 (see below); and
102
IAS 19 Employee Benefits

IAS 19:34B(d) d) if the entity accounts for the contribution payable for the period in accordance with paragraph 34A of IAS 19, the
information about the plan as a whole required in accordance with paragraphs 120A(b) to (e), (j), (n), (o), (q) and
121 of IAS 19 (see below). The other disclosures required by paragraph 120A of IAS 19 do not apply.
IAS 19:34, 34B Note: Defined benefit plans that share risks between various entities under common control (e.g. a parent and its
subsidiaries) are not multi-employer plans. Participation in such a plan is, however, a related party transaction
for each individual group entity.
Post-employment benefits – state plans
IAS 19:36 An entity is required to disclose the same information for a state plan as IAS 19 requires for a multi-employer plan (see
‘multi-employer plans’ section above – paragraphs 29, 30 and 32B of IAS 19).
Post-employment benefits – defined contribution plans
IAS 19:46 An entity shall disclose the amount recognised as an expense for defined contribution plans.
IAS 19:47 Where required by IAS 24 an entity discloses information about contributions to defined contribution plans for key
management personnel.
Post-employment benefits – defined benefit plans
Presentation
IAS 19:116 An entity shall offset an asset relating to one plan against a liability relating to another plan when, and only when, the
entity:
a) has a legally enforceable right to use a surplus in one plan to settle obligations under the other plan; and
b) intends either to settle the obligations on a net basis, or to realise the surplus in one plan and settle its obligation
under the other plan simultaneously.
IAS 19:117 Notes:
1. The offsetting criteria are similar to those established for financial instruments in IAS 32 Financial Instruments:
Presentation.
IAS 19:118 2. Where the entity distinguishes current assets and liabilities from non-current assets and liabilities for statement of
financial position presentation purposes, IAS 19 does not specify whether an entity should distinguish current and
non-current portions of assets and liabilities arising from post-employment benefits.
Disclosure
IAS 19:122 Notes:
1) When an entity has more than one defined benefit plan, disclosures may be made in total, separately for each
plan, or in such groupings as are considered to be the most useful. It may be useful to distinguish groupings by
criteria such as the following:
• the geographical location of the plans (e.g. by distinguishing domestic plans from foreign plans); or
• whether plans are subject to materially different risks (e.g. by distinguishing flat salary pension plans from final
salary pension plans and from post-employment medical plans).
IAS 19:122 2) When an entity provides disclosures in total for a grouping of plans, such disclosures are provided in the form of
weighted averages or of relatively narrow ranges.
IAS 19:120 An entity shall disclose information that enables users of financial statements to evaluate the nature of its defined benefit
plans and the financial effects of changes in those plans during the period.
An entity shall disclose the following information about defined benefit plans:
IAS 19:120A(a) a) the entity’s accounting policy for recognising actuarial gains and losses;
IAS 19:120A(b) b) a general description of the type of plan;

IAS 19:121 Note: Paragraph 120A(b) requires a general description of the type of plan. Such a description distinguishes, for
example, flat salary pension plans from final salary pension plans and from post-employment medical
plans. The description of the plan shall include informal practices that give rise to constructive obligations
included in the measurement of the defined benefit obligation in accordance with paragraph 52 of IAS 19.
Further detail is not required.
IAS 19:120A(c) c) a reconciliation of opening and closing balances of the present value of the defined benefit obligation showing
separately, if applicable, the effects during the period attributable to each of the following:
i) current service cost;
ii) interest cost;
iii) contributions by plan participants;
iv) actuarial gains and losses;
v) foreign currency exchange rate changes on plans measured in a currency different from the entity’s presentation
currency;
vi) benefits paid;
vii) past service cost;
viii) business combinations;
ix) curtailments; and
x) settlements;
IAS 19:120A(d) d) an analysis of the defined benefit obligation into amounts arising from plans that are wholly unfunded and amounts
arising from plans that are wholly or partly funded;
IAS 19:120A(e) e) a reconciliation of the opening and closing balances of the fair value of plan assets and of the opening and closing
balances of any reimbursement right recognised as an asset in accordance with paragraph 104A of IAS 19 showing
separately, if applicable, the effects during the period attributable to each of the following:
i) expected return on plan assets;
ii) actuarial gains and losses;
iii) foreign currency exchange rate changes on plans measured in a currency different from the entity’s presentation
currency;
iv) contributions by the employer;
v) contributions by plan participants;
vi) benefits paid;
vii) business combinations; and
viii) settlements;
IAS 19:120A(f) f) a reconciliation of the present value of the defined benefit obligation in paragraph 120A(c) (see above) and the fair
value of the plan assets in paragraph 120A(e) (see above) to the assets and liabilities recognised in the statement of
financial position, showing at least:
i) the net actuarial gains or losses not recognised in the statement of financial position (see paragraph 92 of
IAS 19);
ii) the past service cost not recognised in the statement of financial position (see paragraph 96 of IAS 19);
iii) any amount not recognised as an asset, because of the limit in paragraph 58(b) of IAS 19;
iv) the fair value at the end of the reporting period of any reimbursement right recognised as an asset in
accordance with paragraph 104A (with a brief description of the link between the reimbursement right and the
related obligation); and
v) the other amounts recognised in the statement of financial position;
104

IAS 19:120A(g) g) the total expense recognised in profit or loss for each of the following, and the line item(s) in which they are
included:
i) current service cost;
ii) interest cost;
iii) expected return on plan assets;
iv) expected return on any reimbursement right recognised as an asset in accordance with paragraph 104A of
IAS 19;
v) actuarial gains and losses;
vi) past service cost;
vii) the effect of any curtailment or settlement; and
viii) the effect of the limit in paragraph 58(b) of IAS 19;
IAS 19:119 Note: IAS 19 does not specify whether an entity should present current service cost, interest cost and the
expected return on plan assets as components of a single item of income or expense in the statement of
IAS 19:120A(h) h) the total amount recognised in other comprehensive income for each of the following:
i) actuarial gains and losses; and
ii) the effect of the limit in paragraph 58(b) of IAS 19;
IAS 19:120A(i) i) for entities that recognise actuarial gains and losses in other comprehensive income in accordance with paragraph
93A of IAS 19, the cumulative amount of actuarial gains and losses recognised in other comprehensive income;
IAS 19:120A(j) j) for each major category of plan assets (which shall include, but is not limited to, equity instruments, debt
instruments, property, and all other assets), the percentage or amount that each major category constitutes of the
fair value of the total plan assets;
IAS 19:120A(k) k) the amounts included in the fair value of plan assets for:
i) each category of the entity’s own financial instruments; and
ii) any property occupied by, or other assets used by, the entity;
IAS 19:120A(l) l) a narrative description of the basis used to determine the overall expected rate of return on assets, including the
effect of the major categories of plan assets;
IAS 19:120A(m) m) the actual return on plan assets, as well as the actual return on any reimbursement right recognised as an asset in
accordance with paragraph 104A of IAS 19;
IAS 19:120A(n) n) the principal actuarial assumptions used as at the end of the reporting period, including, when applicable:
i) the discount rates;
ii) the expected rates of return on any plan assets for the periods presented in the financial statements;
iii) the expected rates of return for the periods presented in the financial statements on any reimbursement right
recognised as an asset in accordance with paragraph 104A of IAS 19;
iv) the expected rates of salary increases (and of changes in an index or other variable specified in the formal or
constructive terms of a plan as the basis for future benefit increases);
v) medical cost trend rates; and
vi) any other material actuarial assumptions used;
IAS 19:120A(n) Note: An entity shall disclose each actuarial assumption in absolute terms (for example, as an absolute
percentage) and not just as a margin between different percentages or other variables.

IAS 19:120A(o) o) the effect of an increase of one percentage point and the effect of a decrease of one percentage point in the
assumed medical cost trend rates on:
i) the aggregate of the current service cost and interest cost components of net periodic post-employment
medical costs; and
ii) the accumulated post-employment benefit obligation for medical costs;
Notes:
IAS 19:120A(o) 1) For the purposes of the disclosures under paragraph 120A(o) (see above), all other assumptions shall be held
constant.
IAS 19:120A(o) 2) For plans operating in a high inflation environment, the disclosure shall be the effect of a percentage increase
or decrease in the assumed medical cost trend rate of a significance similar to one percentage point in a low
inflation environment.
IAS 19:120A(p) p) the amounts for the current annual period and previous four annual periods of:
i) the present value of the defined benefit obligation, the fair value of the plan assets and the surplus or deficit in
the plan; and
ii) the experience adjustments arising on:
a) the plan liabilities expressed either as (1) an amount or (2) a percentage of the plan liabilities at the end of
the reporting period; and
b) the plan assets expressed either as (1) an amount or (2) a percentage of the plan assets at the end of the
IAS 19:160 Note: An entity may disclose the amounts required by paragraph 120A(p) as the amounts are determined for
each annual period prospectively from the first annual period presented in the financial statements in
which the entity first applies the amendments in paragraph 120A.
IAS 19:120A(q) q) the employer’s best estimate, as soon as it can reasonably be determined, of contributions expected to be paid to
the plan during the annual period beginning after the reporting period.
IAS 19:124 Where required by IAS 24, an entity discloses information about:
a) related party transactions with post-employment benefit plans; and
b) post-employment benefits for key management personnel.
IAS 19:125 Where required by IAS 37, an entity discloses information about contingent liabilities arising from post-employment
benefit obligations.
Other long-term employee benefits
IAS 19:131 Although IAS 19 does not require specific disclosures about other long-term employee benefits, other Standards may
require disclosures (e.g. where the expense resulting from such benefits is material and so would require disclosure in
accordance with IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, or where IAS 24 requires an entity to disclose information
about employee benefits for key management personnel).
Termination benefits
IAS 19:141 Where there is uncertainty about the number of employees who will accept an offer of termination benefits, the entity
discloses information about the resultant contingent liability as required by IAS 37 unless the possibility of an outflow in
settlement is remote.
IAS 19:142 As required by IAS 1, an entity discloses the nature and amount of an expense arising from termination benefits if it is
material.
IAS 19:143 Where required by IAS 24, an entity discloses information about termination benefits for key management personnel.
106

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 20. The Standard
distinguishes between government grants (for which it prescribes the accounting treatment) and government assistance
(which cannot reasonably have a value placed on it, but may have a significant impact on the entity and, therefore,
should be disclosed).
None
None
Contingent liabilities and contingent assets related to government grants
IAS 20:11 Once a government grant is recognised, any related contingent liability or contingent asset is treated (and, therefore,
disclosed) in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
Grants recognised as income in the period in which the entity qualifies to receive them
IAS 20:21 Where a government grant has been awarded for the purpose of giving immediate financial support to the entity, rather
than as an incentive to undertake specific expenditures, such that the grant has been recognised in profit or loss of the
period in which the entity qualifies to receive it, the entity is required to provide sufficient disclosure to ensure that the
effect of the grant is clearly understood.
IAS 20:22 Where a government grant has been awarded as compensation for expenses or losses incurred in a previous period,
such that the grant has been recognised in profit or loss of the period in which the entity qualifies to receive it, the entity
is required to provide sufficient disclosure to ensure that the effect of the grant is clearly understood.
Presentation of grants related to assets
IAS 20:24 Government grants related to assets, including non-monetary grants at fair value, shall be presented in the statement of
financial position either by setting up the grant as deferred income or by deducting the grant in arriving at the carrying
amount of the asset.
IAS 20:25 to 27 Note: Two methods of presentation in financial statements of grants (or the appropriate portions of grants) related to
assets are regarded as acceptable alternatives. One method recognises the grant as deferred income that is
recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the useful life of the asset. The other method deducts the
grant in calculating the carrying amount of the asset.
IAS 20:28 In order to show the gross investment in assets, the entity often discloses, as separate items in the statement of cash
flows, the purchase of assets and the receipt of related grants, regardless of whether or not the grant is deducted from
the related asset for presentation purposes in the statement of financial position.
Presentation of grants related to income
IAS 20:29 Grants related to income may be presented either:
a) as a credit in the statement of comprehensive income, either separately or under a general heading such as ‘other
income’; or
b) as a deduction in reporting the related expense.
IAS 20:31 Note: Both methods are regarded as acceptable for the presentation of grants related to income.
IAS 1, it presents grants related to income as required in paragraph 29 in that separate statement.
IAS 20:31 Whichever method of presenting grants related to income has been selected, disclosure of the amount of the grant may
be necessary for a proper understanding of the financial statements.
IAS 20:31 Disclosure of the effect of grants on any item of income or expense which is required to be separately disclosed is usually
appropriate.
107
IAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance

108
Government assistance
IAS 20:36 Disclosure of the nature, extent and duration of significant government assistance may be necessary in order that the
financial statements are not misleading.
General disclosure requirements
The following matters shall be disclosed:
IAS 20:39(a) a) the accounting policy adopted for government grants, including the methods of presentation adopted in the
financial statements;
IAS 20:39(b) b) the nature and extent of government grants recognised in the financial statements and an indication of other forms
of government assistance from which the entity has directly benefited; and
IAS 20:39(c) c) unfulfilled conditions and other contingencies attaching to government assistance that has been recognised.

accounting treatment for transactions in foreign currencies and foreign operations as well as the presentation of an
entity’s financial statements in a foreign currency. The principal issues are: the determination of the method of including
foreign currency transactions and foreign operations in the financial statements of an entity, how to translate the
financial statements into a presentation currency and the selection of an appropriate exchange rate, and how to report
the effects of changes in exchange rates in financial statements.
IAS 21 uses the term ‘functional currency’, defined as “the currency of the primary economic environment in which the
entity operates”, to determine the measurement of foreign transactions and balances in the entity’s financial
statements. Although an entity normally presents its financial statements in the same currency as its functional
currency, it may choose to present its financial statements in a different currency. The currency selected by an entity in
presenting its financial statements is called the “presentation currency”.
None
• IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (issued November 2009) included consequential amendment to paragraph 52(a) of
IAS 21. The amendment is applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, with earlier
application permitted; and
• Improvements to IFRSs (issued in May 2010) amended IAS 21 (although no amendments to disclosure
requirements). Those amendments are applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2010 with earlier
Allocation of exchange differences arising on the consolidation of foreign operations to non-controlling
interests, where applicable
IAS 21:41 When a foreign operation is consolidated but it is not wholly-owned, accumulated exchange differences arising from
translation and attributable to non-controlling interests are allocated to, and recognised as part of, the non-controlling
interests in the consolidated statement of financial position.
IAS 21:41 Note: The translation of the financial statements of a foreign operation results in the recognition of exchange
differences arising from:
• translating income and expense items at the exchange rates at the dates of transactions and assets and
liabilities at the closing rate; and
• translating the opening net assets at a closing rate that differs from the previous closing rate.
These exchange differences are recognised as a separate component of equity. Paragraph 41 of IAS 21
(see above) requires an appropriate proportion to be allocated to non-controlling interests.
Disclosure
IAS 21:51 Note: In paragraphs 53 and 55 to 57 of IAS 21 (see below), references to ‘functional currency’ apply, in the case of a
group, to the functional currency of the parent.
IAS 21:52(a) a) the amount of exchange differences recognised in profit or loss (except for those arising on financial instruments
measured at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IAS 39 and, when adopted, IFRS 9); and
IAS 21:52(b) b) net exchange differences recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in a separate component of
equity, and a reconciliation of the amount of such exchange differences at the beginning and end of the period.
109
IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates

IAS 21:53 When the presentation currency is different from the functional currency of the entity:
a) that fact shall be stated;
b) the functional currency shall be disclosed; and
c) the reason for using a different presentation currency shall be disclosed.
IAS 21:54 When there is a change in the functional currency of either the reporting entity or a significant foreign operation, that
fact and the reason for the change in functional currency shall be disclosed.
IAS 21:55 When an entity presents its financial statements in a currency that is different from its functional currency, it shall
describe the financial statements as complying with IFRSs only if they comply with all the requirements of IFRSs and each
applicable Interpretation of those IFRSs, including the translation method set out in paragraphs 39 and 42 of IAS 21.
IAS 21:57 When an entity displays its financial statements or other financial information in a currency that is different from either
its functional currency or its presentation currency, and the requirements of paragraph 55 of IAS 21 (see above) are not
met, the entity shall:
a) clearly identify the information as supplementary information to distinguish it from the information that complies
with IFRSs;
b) disclose the currency in which the supplementary information is displayed; and
c) disclose the entity’s functional currency and the method of translation used to determine the supplementary
information.
IAS 21:56 Note: For example, an entity may convert into another currency only selected items from its financial statements, or
an entity whose functional currency is not the currency of a hyperinflationary economy may convert the
financial statements into another currency by translating all items at the most recent closing rate.
Such conversions are not in accordance with IFRSs and the disclosures set out in paragraph 57 of IAS 21
(see above) are required.
110

accounting treatment for borrowing costs. Following the adoption of the revised IAS 23(2007), which is effective for
annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009, capitalisation is the only permitted accounting treatment for
borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset.
None
None
IAS 23:26(a) a) the amount of borrowing costs capitalised during the period; and
IAS 23:26(b) b) the capitalisation rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation.
111
IAS 23 Borrowing Costs

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of the identification of related
parties and transactions with related parties. The primary issue is to ensure that all related parties are identified. The
objective of IAS 24 is to ensure that an entity’s financial statements contain the disclosures necessary to draw attention
to the possibility that its financial position and profit or loss may have been affected by the existence of related parties
and by transactions and outstanding balances with such parties.
Refer to IAS 24 for details of the Standard’s scope.
IAS 24 requires disclosure of related party transactions and outstanding balances in the separate financial statements
of a parent, venturer or investor presented in accordance with IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements.
Related party transactions and outstanding balances with other entities in a group are disclosed in an entity’s financial
statements. Intragroup related party transactions and outstanding balances are eliminated in the preparation of
consolidated financial statements of the group.
None
IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures issued in November 2009 supersedes IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures (as revised in
2003). The revised Standard is applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011.
This section of the checklist sets out the presentation and disclosure requirements of the IAS 24 (as revised in 2003).
The presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 24(2009) are set out in the next section of this checklist, which
should be completed for entities that have adopted IAS 24(2009) in advance of its effective date.
Identification of related parties
IAS 24:9(a)(i) A party is related to an entity if, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, the party controls, is controlled
by, or is under common control with the entity.
IAS 24:9(a)(i) Notes:
1) This includes parents, subsidiaries and fellow subsidiaries.
IAS 24:9 2) Control is the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its
activities.
IAS 24:9(a)(ii) A party is related to an entity if, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, the party has an interest in the
entity that gives it significant influence over the entity.
IAS 24:9 Note: Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of an entity, but
is not control over those policies. Significant influence may be gained by share ownership, statute or
agreement.
IAS 24:9(a)(iii) A party is related to an entity if, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, the party has joint control over
the entity.
IAS 24:9 Note: Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control over an economic activity.
IAS 24:9(b) A party is related to an entity if the party is an associate (as defined in IAS 28 Investments in Associates) of the entity.
IAS 24:9(c) A party is related to an entity if the party is a joint venture in which the entity is a venturer (see IAS 31 Interests in Joint
Ventures).
IAS 24:9(d) A party is related to an entity if the party is a member of the key management personnel of the entity or its parent.
IAS 24:9 Note: Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and
controlling the activities of the entity, directly or indirectly, including any director (whether executive or
otherwise) of that entity.
112
IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures

IAS 24:9(e) A party is related to an entity if the party is a close member of the family of any individual referred to in paragraphs 9(a)
or 9(d) of IAS 24 (see above).
IAS 24:9 Note: Close members of the family of an individual are those family members who may be expected to influence, or
be influenced by, that individual in their dealings with the entity. They may include the following (the list is not
exhaustive):
• the individual’s domestic partner and children;
• children of the individual’s domestic partner; and
• dependants of the individual or the individual’s domestic partner.
IAS 24:9(f) A party is related to an entity if the party is an entity that is controlled, jointly controlled or significantly influenced by, or
for which significant voting power in such entity resides with, directly or indirectly, any individual referred to in
paragraphs 9(d) or 9(e) of IAS 24 (see above).
IAS 24:9(g) A party is related to an entity if the party is a post-employment benefit plan for the benefit of employees of the entity, or
of any entity that is a related party of the entity.
Notes:
IAS 24:10 1) In considering each possible related party relationship, attention is directed to the substance of the relationship and
not merely the legal form.
IAS 24:11 2) In the context of IAS 24, the following are not necessarily related parties:
a) two entities simply because they have a director or other member of key management personnel in common,
not withstanding (d) and (f) in the definition of related party in paragraph 9 of IAS 24 (see above);
b) two venturers simply because they share joint control over a joint venture;
c) providers of finance, trade unions, public utilities, government departments and agencies, simply by virtue of
their normal dealings with an entity (even though they may affect the freedom of action of an entity or
participate in its decision-making process); and
d) a customer, supplier, franchisor, distributor or general agent with whom an entity transacts a significant volume
of business, merely by virtue of the resulting economic dependence.
Related party disclosures
Disclosure of parent and ultimate controlling party
IAS 24:12 An entity shall disclose the name of its parent and, if different, its ultimate controlling party.
IAS 24:12 Note: Relationships between parents and subsidiaries shall be disclosed irrespective of whether there have been
transactions between those related parties.
IAS 24:12 If neither the parent nor the ultimate controlling party produces financial statements for public use, the name of the next
most senior parent that does produce such financial statements shall also be disclosed.
IAS 24:15 Note: The next most senior parent is the first parent in the group above the immediate parent that produces
consolidated financial statements for public use.
IAS 24:13 To enable users of financial statements to form a view about the effects of related party relationships on an entity, it is
appropriate to disclose the related party relationship when control exists, irrespective of whether there have been
transactions between the related parties.
IAS 24:14 Note: The identification of related party relationships between parents and subsidiaries is in addition to the disclosure
requirements in IAS 27, IAS 28 and IAS 31, which require an appropriate listing and description of significant
investments in subsidiaries, associates and jointly controlled entities.

Compensation of key management personnel
IAS 24:16 An entity shall disclose key management personnel compensation in total.
IAS 24:9 Notes:
1) See above for the definition of key management personnel.
2) Compensation includes all employee benefits (as defined in IAS 19 Employee Benefits) including employee benefits
to which IFRS 2 Share-based Payment applies. Employee benefits are all forms of consideration paid, payable or
provided by the entity, or on behalf of the entity, in exchange for services rendered to the entity. It also includes
such consideration paid on behalf of a parent of the entity in respect of the entity. Compensation includes:
a) short-term employee benefits, such as wages, salaries and social security contributions, paid annual leave and
paid sick leave, profit-sharing and bonuses (if payable within twelve months of the end of the period) and non-
monetary benefits (such as medical care, housing, cars and free or subsidised goods or services) for current
employees;
b) post-employment benefits such as pensions, other retirement benefits, post-employment life insurance and
post-employment medical care;
c) other long-term employee benefits, including long-service leave or sabbatical leave, jubilee or other long-
service benefits, long-term disability benefits and, if they are not payable wholly within twelve months after the
end of the period, profit-sharing, bonuses and deferred compensation;
d) termination benefits; and
e) share-based payment.
An entity shall disclose key management personnel compensation for each of the following categories:
IAS 24:16(a) a) short-term employee benefits;
IAS 24:16(b) b) post-employment benefits;
IAS 24:16(c) c) other long-term benefits;
IAS 24:16(d) d) termination benefits; and
IAS 24:16(e) e) share-based payment.
Transactions between related parties
IAS 24:17 If there have been transactions between related parties, an entity shall disclose:
a) the nature of the related party relationship; and
b) information about the transactions and outstanding balances necessary for an understanding of the potential effect
of the relationship on the financial statements.
IAS 24:17 Note: These disclosures are in addition to the requirements in paragraph 16 of IAS 24 to disclose key management
personnel compensation (see above).
At a minimum, the information disclosed about related party transactions and outstanding balances shall include:
IAS 24:17(a) a) the amount of the transactions;
IAS 24:17(b) b) the amount of the outstanding balances and:
i) their terms and conditions, including whether they are secured, and the nature of the consideration to be
provided in settlement; and
ii) details of any guarantees given or received;
IAS 24:17(c) c) provisions for doubtful debts related to the amount of outstanding balances; and
IAS 24:17(d) d) the expense recognised during the period in respect of bad or doubtful debts due from related parties.
114

The disclosures required by paragraph 17 of IAS 24 (see above) shall be made separately for each of the following
categories:
IAS 24:18(a) a) the parent;
IAS 24:18(b) b) entities with joint control or significant influence over the entity;
IAS 24:18(c) c) subsidiaries;
IAS 24:18(d) d) associates;
IAS 24:18(e) e) joint ventures in which the entity is a venturer;
IAS 24:18(f) f) key management personnel of the entity or its parent; and
IAS 24:18(g) g) other related parties.
Notes:
IAS 24:19 1) The classification of amounts payable to, and receivable from, related parties in the different categories as required
in paragraph 18 of IAS 24 (see above) is an extension of the disclosure requirement in IAS 1 Presentation of
Financial Statements for information to be presented either in the statement of financial position or in the notes.
The categories are extended to provide a more comprehensive analysis of related party balances and apply to
related party transactions.
IAS 24:20 2) The following are examples of transactions that are disclosed if they are with a related party:
a) purchases or sales of goods (finished or unfinished);
b) purchases or sales of property and other assets;
c) rendering or receiving of services;
d) leases;
e) transfers of research and development;
f) transfers under licence agreements;
g) transfers under finance arrangements (including loans and equity contributions in cash or in kind);
h) provision of guarantees or collateral; and
i) settlement of liabilities on behalf of the entity or by the entity on behalf of another party.
IAS 24:20 Participation by a parent or a subsidiary in a defined benefit plan that shares risks between group entities is a
transaction between related parties (see paragraph 34B of IAS 19).
IAS 24:21 Disclosures that related party transactions were made on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s length transactions
are made only if such terms can be substantiated.
IAS 24:22 Items of a similar nature may be disclosed in aggregate except when separate disclosure is necessary for an
understanding of the effects of related party transactions on the financial statements of the entity.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of the identification of related
parties and transactions with related parties. The primary issue is to ensure that all related parties are identified. The
objective of IAS 24(2009) is to ensure that an entity’s financial statements contain the disclosures necessary to draw
attention to the possibility that its financial position and profit or loss may have been affected by the existence of
related parties and by transactions and outstanding balances, including commitments, with such parties.
Refer to IAS 24(2009) for details of the Standard’s scope.
IAS 24(2009) requires disclosure of related party relationships, transactions and outstanding balances, including
commitments, in the consolidated and separate financial statements of a parent, venturer or investor presented in
accordance with IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. This Standard also applies to individual
Related party transactions and outstanding balances with other entities in a group are disclosed in an entity’s financial
statements. Intragroup related party transactions and outstanding balances are eliminated in the preparation of
consolidated financial statements of the group.
None
This Standard supersedes IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures (as revised in 2003). An entity shall apply this Standard
retrospectively for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. Earlier application is permitted, either of the
whole Standard or of the partial exemption in paragraphs 25-27 for governmental-related entities. If an entity applies
either the whole Standard or that partial exemption for a period before 1 January 2011, it shall disclose that fact.
Identification of related parties
IAS 24(2009):9 A related party is a person or entity that is related to the entity that is preparing its financial statements (also referred to
as the “reporting entity”).
IAS 24(2009): a) A person or a close member of that person’s family is related to a reporting entity if that person:
9(a)
IAS 24(2009): (i) has control or joint control over the reporting entity;
9(a)(i)
IAS 24(2009): (ii) has significant influence over the reporting entity; or
9(a)(ii)
IAS 24(2009): (iii) is a member of the key management personnel of the reporting entity or of a parent of the reporting entity.
9(a)(iii)
Notes:
IAS 24(2009):9 1. Close members of the family of a person are those family members who may be expected to influence, or be
influenced by, that person in their dealings with the entity and include:
(i) that person’s children and spouse or domestic partner;
(ii) children of that person’s spouse or domestic partner; and
(iii) dependants of that person or that person’s spouse or domestic partner.
IAS 24(2009):9 2. Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and
controlling the activities of the entity, directly or indirectly, including any director (whether executive or otherwise)
of that entity.
IAS 24(2009):9 3. Control is the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its
activities.
IAS 24(2009):9 4. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control over an economic activity.
IAS 24(2009):9 5. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of an entity, but is
not control over those policies. Significant influence may be gained by share ownership, statute or agreement.
116
IAS 24(2009) Related Party Disclosures

IAS 24(2009): b) An entity is related to a reporting entity if any of the following conditions applies.
9(b)
IAS 24(2009): (i) The entity and the reporting entity are members of the same group (which means that each parent, subsidiary
9(b)(i) and fellow subsidiary is related to the others).
IAS 24(2009): (ii) One entity is an associate or joint venture of the other entity (or an associate or joint venture of a member of a
9(b)(ii) group of which the other entity is a member).
IAS 24(2009): (iii) Both entities are joint ventures of the same third party.
9(b)(iii)
IAS 24(2009): (iv) One entity is a joint venture of a third entity and the other entity is an associate of the third entity.
9(b)(iv)
IAS 24(2009): (v) The entity is a post-employment benefit plan for the benefit of employees of either the reporting entity or an
9(b)(v) entity related to the reporting entity. If the reporting entity is itself such a plan, the sponsoring employers are
also related to the reporting entity.
IAS 24(2009): (vi) The entity is controlled or jointly controlled by a person identified in paragraph 9(a) of IAS 24(2009) (see above).
9(b)(vi)
IAS 24(2009): (vii) A person identified in paragraph 9(a)(i) of IAS 24(2009) (see above) has significant influence over the entity or is
9(b)(vii) a member of the key management personnel of the entity (or of a parent of the entity).
Notes:
IAS 24(2009):10 1. In considering each possible related party relationship, attention is directed to the substance of the relationship and
not merely the legal form.
IAS 24(2009):11 2. In the context of IAS 24(2009), the following are not related parties:
a) two entities simply because they have a director or other member of key management personnel in common or
because a member of key management personnel of one entity has significant influence over the other entity;
b) two venturers simply because they share joint control over a joint venture;
c) providers of finance, trade unions, public utilities, and departments and agencies of a government that does
not control, jointly control or significantly influence the reporting entity, simply by virtue of their normal
dealings with an entity (even though they may affect the freedom of action of an entity or participate in its
decision-making process); and
d) a customer, supplier, franchisor, distributor or general agent with whom an entity transacts a significant volume
of business, simply by virtue of the resulting economic dependence.
IAS 24(2009):12 3. In the definition of a related party, an associate includes subsidiaries of the associate and a joint venture includes
subsidiaries of the joint venture. Therefore, for example, an associate’s subsidiary and the investor that has
significant influence over the associate are related to each other.
Related party disclosures
All entities
IAS 24(2009):13 An entity shall disclose the name of its parent and, if different, the ultimate controlling party.
IAS 24(2009):13 Note: Relationships between a parent and its subsidiaries shall be disclosed irrespective of whether there have been
transactions between them.
IAS 24(2009):13 If neither the entity’s parent nor the ultimate controlling party produces consolidated financial statements available for
public use, the name of the next most senior parent that does so shall also be disclosed.
IAS 24(2009):16 Note: The next most senior parent is the first parent in the group above the immediate parent that produces
consolidated financial statements available for public use.
IAS 24(2009):14 To enable users of financial statements to form a view about the effects of related party relationships on an entity, it is
appropriate to disclose the related party relationship when control exists, irrespective of whether there have been
transactions between the related parties.

IAS 24(2009):15 Note: The requirement to disclose related party relationships between a parent and its subsidiaries is in addition to
the disclosure requirements in IAS 27, IAS 28 and IAS 31.
Compensation of key management personnel
IAS 24(2009):17 An entity shall disclose key management personnel compensation in total.
Notes:
1) See above for the definition of key management personnel.
IAS 24(2009):9 2) Compensation includes all employee benefits (as defined in IAS 19 Employee Benefits) including employee benefits
to which IFRS 2 Share-based Payment applies. Employee benefits are all forms of consideration paid, payable or
provided by the entity, or on behalf of the entity, in exchange for services rendered to the entity. It also includes
such consideration paid on behalf of a parent of the entity in respect of the entity. Compensation includes:
a) short-term employee benefits, such as wages, salaries and social security contributions, paid annual leave and
paid sick leave, profit-sharing and bonuses (if payable within twelve months of the end of the period) and non-
monetary benefits (such as medical care, housing, cars and free or subsidised goods or services) for current
employees;
b) post-employment benefits such as pensions, other retirement benefits, post-employment life insurance and
post-employment medical care;
c) other long-term employee benefits, including long-service leave or sabbatical leave, jubilee or other long-
service benefits, long-term disability benefits and, if they are not payable wholly within twelve months after the
end of the period, profit-sharing, bonuses and deferred compensation;
d) termination benefits; and
e) share-based payment.
An entity shall disclose key management personnel compensation for each of the following categories:
IAS 24(2009):17(a) a) short-term employee benefits;
IAS 24(2009):17(b) b) post-employment benefits;
IAS 24(2009):17(c) c) other long-term benefits;
IAS 24(2009):17(d) d) termination benefits; and
IAS 24(2009):17(e) e) share-based payment.
Transactions between related parties
IAS 24(2009):9 Note: A related party transaction is a transfer of resources, services or obligations between a reporting entity and a
related party, regardless of whether a price is charged.
IAS 24(2009):18 If an entity has had related party transactions during the periods covered by the financial statements, it shall disclose:
a) the nature of the related party relationship; and
b) information about those transactions and outstanding balances, including commitments, necessary for users to
understand the potential effect of the relationship on the financial statements.
IAS 24(2009):18 Note: These disclosure requirements are in addition to the requirements in paragraph 17 of IAS 24(2009) to disclose
key management personnel compensation (see above).
At a minimum, the information disclosed about related party transactions and outstanding balances shall include:
IAS 24(2009):18(a) a) the amount of the transactions;
IAS 24(2009):18(b) b) the amount of outstanding balances, including commitments, and:
i) their terms and conditions, including whether they are secured, and the nature of the consideration to be
provided in settlement; and
118

ii) details of any guarantees given or received
IAS 24(2009):18(c) c) provisions for doubtful debts related to the amount of outstanding balances; and
IAS 24(2009):18(d) d) the expense recognised during the period in respect of bad or doubtful debts due from related parties.
IAS 24(2009):19 The disclosures required by paragraph 18 of IAS 24(2009) (see above) shall be made separately for each of the following
categories:
IAS 24(2009):19(a) a) the parent;
IAS 24(2009):19(b) b) entities with joint control or significant influence over the entity;
IAS 24(2009):19(c) c) subsidiaries;
IAS 24(2009):19(d) d) associates;
IAS 24(2009):19(e) e) joint ventures in which the entity is a venturer;
IAS 24(2009):19(f) f) key management personnel of the entity or its parent; and
IAS 24(2009):19(g) g) other related parties.
IAS 24(2009):20 Notes:
1) The classification of amounts payable to, and receivable from, related parties in the different categories as required
in paragraph 19 of IAS 24(2009) (see above) is an extension of the disclosure requirement in IAS 1 Presentation of
Financial Statements for information to be presented either in the statement of financial position or in the notes.
The categories are extended to provide a more comprehensive analysis of related party balances and apply to
related party transactions.
IAS 24(2009):21 2) The following are examples of transactions that are disclosed if they are with a related party:
a) purchases or sales of goods (finished or unfinished);
b) purchases or sales of property and other assets;
c) rendering or receiving of services;
d) leases;
e) transfers of research and development;
f) transfers under licence agreements;
g) transfers under finance arrangements (including loans and equity contributions in cash or in kind);
h) provisions of guarantees or collateral;
i) commitments to do something if a particular event occurs or does not occur in the future, including executory
contracts (recognised and unrecognised); and
j) settlement of liabilities on behalf of the entity or by the entity on behalf of that related party.
IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets defines executory contracts (see paragraph 21(i)
above) as contracts under which neither party has performed any of its obligations or both parties have partially
performed their obligations to an equal extent.
IAS 24(2009):22 3) Participation by a parent or a subsidiary in a defined benefit plan that shares risks between group entities is a
transaction between related parties (see paragraph 34B of IAS 19)
IAS 24(2009):23 Disclosures that related party transactions were made on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s length
transactions are made only if such terms can be substantiated.
IAS 24(2009):24 Items of a similar nature may be disclosed in aggregate except when separate disclosure is necessary for an
understanding of the effects of related party transactions on the financial statements of the entity.

Government-related entities
IAS 24(2009):25 Note: A reporting entity is exempt from the disclosure requirements of paragraph 18 (see above) in relation to related
party transactions and outstanding balances, including commitments, with:
a) a government that has control, joint control or significant influence over the reporting entity; and
b) another entity that is a related party because the same government has control, joint control or significant
influence over both the reporting entity and the other entity.
Government refers to government, government agencies and similar bodies whether local, national, or
international.
IAS 24(2009):26 If a reporting entity applies the exemption in paragraph 25 of IAS 24(2009) (see above), it shall disclose the following
about the transactions and related outstanding balances referred to in paragraph 25:
a) the name of the government and the nature of its relationship with the reporting entity (i.e. control, joint control or
significant influence);
b) the following information in sufficient detail to enable users of the entity’s financial statements to understand the
effect of related party transactions on its financial statements:
i) the nature and amount of each individually significant transaction; and
ii) for other transactions that are collectively, but not individually, significant, a qualitative or quantitative indication
of their extent.
Note: Types of transactions include those listed in paragraph 21 of IAS 24(2009) (see above).
IAS 24(2009):27 Note: In using its judgement to determine the level of detail to be disclosed in accordance with the requirements in
paragraph 26(b) of IAS 24(2009)(see above), the reporting entity shall consider the closeness of the related
party relationship and other factors relevant in establishing the level of significance of the transaction such as
whether it is:
a) significant in terms of size;
b) carried out on non-market terms;
c) outside normal day-to-day business operations, such as the purchase and sale of businesses;
d) disclosed to regulatory or supervisory authorities;
e) reported to senior management;
f) subject to shareholder approval.
Adoption of revised Standard in advance of effective date
IAS 24(2009):28 If the entity has applied either the whole Standard or the partial exemption in paragraphs 25-27 of IAS 24(2009) for a
period beginning before 1 January 2011, it shall disclose that fact.
120

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 26, which should be applied
in the financial statements of retirement benefit plans where such financial statements are prepared. Retirement benefit
plans are sometimes referred to by various other names such as ‘pension schemes’, ‘superannuation schemes’ or
‘retirement benefit schemes’.
Retirement benefit plans are normally described as either defined contribution or defined benefit plans, each having
their own distinctive characteristics. Occasionally plans exist that contain characteristics of both. Such hybrid plans are
considered to be defined benefit plans for the purpose of IAS 26.
IAS 26 regards a retirement benefit plan as a reporting entity separate from the employees of the participants of the
plan. All other IFRSs apply to the financial statements of retirement benefit plans to the extent that they are not
superseded by IAS 26. IAS 26 complements IAS 19 Employee Benefits, the Standard concerned with the determination
of the cost of retirement benefits in the financial statements of employers having plans.
IAS 26 deals with accounting and reporting by the plan to all participants (as defined) as a group. It does not deal with
reports to individual participants about their retirement benefit plans.
IAS 26 applies to defined contribution schemes and defined benefit schemes regardless of the creation or otherwise of
a separate fund (which may or may not have a separate legal identity and may or may not have trustees) to which
contributions are made and from which retirement benefits are paid.
Retirement benefit plans with assets invested with insurance companies are subject to the same accounting and
funding requirements as privately invested arrangements and, accordingly, are within the scope of IAS 26 unless the
contract with the insurance company is in the name of a specified participant or group of participants and the
retirement benefit obligation is solely the responsibility of the insurance company.
None
None
Defined contribution plans
IAS 26:13 The financial statements of a defined contribution plan shall contain:
a) a statement of net assets available for benefits; and
b) a description of the funding policy.
The financial statements usually include:
IAS 26:16(a) a) a description of significant activities for the period and the effect of any changes relating to the plan, and its
membership and terms and conditions;
IAS 26:16(b) b) statements reporting on the transactions and investment performance for the period and the financial position of
the plan at the end of the period; and
IAS 26:16(c) c) a description of the investment policies.
IAS 26:16 Note: The disclosures set out in paragraph 16 of IAS 26 (see above) are designed to achieve the primary objective of
reporting by a defined contribution plan, i.e. to provide information about the plan and the performance of its
investments.
Defined benefit plans
The financial statements of a defined benefit plan shall contain either:
IAS 26:17(a) a) a statement that shows:
i) the net assets available for benefits;
ii) the actuarial present value of promised retirement benefits, distinguishing between vested benefits and non-
vested benefits; and
121
IAS 26 Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans

iii) the resulting excess or deficit; or
IAS 26:17(b) b) a statement of net assets available for benefits including either:
i) a note disclosing the actuarial present value of promised retirement benefits, distinguishing between vested
benefits and non-vested benefits; or
ii) a reference to this information in an accompanying actuarial report.
IAS 26:17 Note: If an actuarial valuation has not been prepared at the date of the financial statements, the most recent
valuation shall be used as a base.
IAS 26:17 If an actuarial valuation has not been prepared at the date of the financial statements, the date of the most recent
valuation that has been used shall be disclosed.
IAS 26:18 For the purposes of paragraph 17 of IAS 26 (see above):
a) the actuarial present value of promised retirement benefits shall be based on the benefits promised under the terms
of the plan on service rendered to date using either current salary levels or projected salary levels: and
b) the basis used shall be disclosed in the financial statements.
IAS 26:18 The effect of any changes in actuarial assumptions that have had a significant effect on the actuarial present value of
promised retirement benefits shall be disclosed.
IAS 26:19 The financial statements shall explain the relationship between the actuarial present value of promised retirement
benefits and the net assets available for benefits, and the policy for the funding of promised benefits.
The financial statements usually include:
IAS 26:22(a) a) a description of significant activities for the period and the effect of any changes relating to the plan, and its
membership and terms and conditions;
IAS 26:22(b) b) statements reporting on the transactions and investment performance for the period and the financial position of
the plan at the end of the period;
IAS 26:22(c) c) actuarial information either as part of the statements or by way of a separate report; and
IAS 26:22(d) d) a description of the investment policies.
IAS 26:22 Note: The disclosures set out in paragraph 22 of IAS 26 (see above) are designed to achieve the primary objective of
reporting by a defined benefit plan, i.e. periodically to provide information about the financial resources and
activities of the plan that is useful in assessing the relationships between the accumulation of resources and
plan benefits over time. See paragraphs 28 to 31 of IAS 26 for further considerations as to the appropriate way
to present the required information.
IAS 26:26 In addition to the disclosure of the actuarial present value of promised retirement benefits, sufficient explanation may
need to be been given so as to indicate clearly the context in which the actuarial present value of promised retirement
benefits should be read.
IAS 26:26 Note: Such explanation may be in the form of information about the adequacy of the planned future funding and of
the funding policy based on salary projections. This may be included in the financial statements or in the
actuary’s report.
All plans
IAS 26:32 Note: Retirement benefit plan investments shall be carried at fair value. In the case of marketable securities, fair value
is market value.
IAS 26:32 Where plan investments are held for which an estimate of fair value is not possible, disclosure shall be made of the
reason why fair value is not used.
IAS 26:33 To the extent that investments are carried at amounts other than market value or fair value, fair value is generally also
disclosed.
122

The financial statements of the retirement benefit plan, whether defined benefit or defined contribution, shall also
contain the following information:
IAS 26:34(a) a) a statement of changes in net assets available for benefits;
IAS 26:34(b) b) a summary of significant accounting policies; and
IAS 26:34(c) c) a description of the plan and the effect of any changes in the plan during the period.
The financial statements provided by retirement benefit plans include the following, if applicable:
IAS 26:35(a) a) a statement of net assets available for benefits disclosing:
i) assets at the end of the period suitably classified;
ii) the basis of valuation of assets;
iii) details of any single investment exceeding either 5% of the net assets available for benefits or 5% of any class or
type of security;
iv) details of any investment in the employer; and
v) liabilities other than the actuarial present value of promised retirement benefits;
IAS 26:35(b) b) a statement of changes in net assets available for benefits showing the following:
i) employer contributions;
ii) employee contributions;
iii) investment income such as interest and dividends;
iv) other income;
v) benefits paid or payable (analysed, for example, as retirement, death and disability benefits, and lump sum
payments);
vi) administrative expenses;
vii) other expenses;
viii) taxes on income;
ix) profits and losses on disposal of investments and changes in value of investments; and
x) transfers from and to other plans;
IAS 26:35(c) c) a description of the funding policy;
IAS 26:35(d) d) for defined benefit plans, the actuarial present value of promised retirement benefits (which may distinguish
between vested benefits and non-vested benefits) based on the benefits promised under the terms of the plan, on
service rendered to date and using either current salary levels or projected salary levels; and
IAS 26:35(d) Note: This information may be included in an accompanying actuarial report to be read in conjunction with the
related financial statements.
IAS 26:35(e) e) for defined benefit plans, a description of the significant actuarial assumptions made and the method used to
calculate the actuarial present value of promised retirement benefits.
The report of a retirement benefit plan contains a description of the plan, either as part of the financial information or in
a separate report. It may contain the following:
IAS 26:36(a) a) the names of the employers and the employee groups covered;
IAS 26:36(b) b) the number of participants receiving benefits and the number of other participants, classified as appropriate;
IAS 26:36(c) c) the type of plan - defined contribution or defined benefit;
IAS 26:36(d) d) a note as to whether participants contribute to the plan;
IAS 26:36(e) e) a description of the retirement benefits promised to participants;

IAS 26:36(f) f) a description of any plan termination terms; and
IAS 26:36(g) g) changes in items (a) to (f) above during the period covered by the report.
IAS 26:36 Note: It is not uncommon to refer to other documents that are readily available to users and in which the plan is
described, and to include only information on subsequent changes in the report.
124

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 27 (as revised in 2008) ,
which prescribes the accounting principles for the preparation of consolidated financial statements for a group of
entities under the control of a parent. The Standard also applies to the accounting for investments in subsidiaries, jointly
controlled entities and associates when an entity elects, or is required by local regulations, to present separate financial
statements.
In January 2008, the revised version of IAS 27 was issued, which introduced significant changes (e.g. as regards the
accounting for non-controlling interests and the loss of control of a subsidiary). This section of the checklist sets out the
requirements of the revised Standard, which is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009.
Non-controlling interests
IAS 27:27 Non-controlling interests shall be presented in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, separately
from the equity of the owners of the parent.
General disclosures in consolidated financial statements
The following disclosures shall be made in consolidated financial statements:
IAS 27:41(a) a) the nature of the relationship between the parent and a subsidiary when the parent does not own, directly or
indirectly through subsidiaries, more than half of the voting power;
IAS 27:41(b) b) the reasons why the ownership, directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, of more than half of the voting or
potential voting power of an investee does not constitute control;
IAS 27:41(c) c) when the financial statements of a subsidiary used to prepare consolidated financial statements are as of a date or
for a period that is different from that of the parent:
i) the end of the reporting period of the financial statements of the subsidiary; and
ii) the reason for using a different date or period;
IAS 27:41(d) d) the nature and extent of any significant restrictions (e.g. resulting from borrowing arrangements or regulatory
requirements) on the ability of subsidiaries to transfer funds to the parent in the form of cash dividends or to repay
loans or advances;
IAS 27:41(e) e) a schedule that shows the effects of any changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in
a loss of control on the equity attributable to owners of the parent; and
IAS 27:41(f) f) if control of a subsidiary is lost, the parent shall disclose:
i) the gain or loss, if any, recognised in accordance with paragraph 34 of IAS 27;
ii) the portion of that gain or loss attributable to recognising any investment retained in the former subsidiary at its
fair value at the date when control is lost; and
iii) the line item(s) in the statement of comprehensive income in which the gain or loss is recognised (if not
presented separately in the statement of comprehensive income).
125
IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements

Separate financial statements
When separate financial statements are prepared for a parent that, in accordance with paragraph 10 of IAS 27, elects
not to prepare consolidated financial statements, those separate financial statements shall disclose:
IAS 27:42(a) a) the following:
i) the fact that the financial statements are separate financial statements;
ii) the fact that the exemption from consolidation has been used;
iii) the name and country of incorporation or residence of the entity whose consolidated financial statements that
comply with IFRSs have been produced for public use; and
iv) the address where those consolidated financial statements are obtainable;
IAS 27:42(b) b) a list of significant investments in subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates, including the name, country
of incorporation or residence, proportion of ownership interest and, if different, proportion of voting power held;
and
IAS 27:42(c) c) a description of the method used to account for the investments listed under paragraph 42(b) of IAS 27 (see above).
When a parent (other than a parent covered by paragraph 42 of IAS 27 – see above), venturer with an interest in a
jointly controlled entity or an investor in an associate prepares separate financial statements, those separate financial
statements shall disclose:
IAS 27:43(a) a) the fact that the statements are separate financial statements and the reasons why those statements are prepared if
not required by law;
IAS 27:43(b) b) a list of significant investments in subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates, including the name, country
of incorporation or residence, proportion of ownership interest and, if different, proportion of voting power held;
and
IAS 27:43(c) c) a description of the method used to account for the investments listed under paragraph 43(b) of IAS 27 (see above).
IAS 27:43 The separate financial statements referred to in paragraph 43 of IAS 27 shall identify the consolidated financial statements
prepared in accordance with paragraph 9 of IAS 27 or IAS 28 Investments in Associates and IAS 31 Interests in Joint
Ventures to which they relate.
126

accounting by an investor for investments in associates. The primary issues are identifying whether significant influence
exists and the application of the equity method.
None
At 30 September 2010 the following new or revised Standards (issued but not yet effective) add new paragraphs to
Presentation
IAS 28:38 Investments in associates accounted for using the equity method shall be classified as non-current assets.
Disclosure
The following disclosures shall be made:
IAS 28:37(a) a) the fair value of investments in associates for which there are published price quotations;
IAS 28:37(b) b) summarised financial information of associates, including the aggregated amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
profit or loss;
IAS 28:37(c) c) the reasons why the presumption that an investor does not have significant influence is overcome if the investor
holds, directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, less than 20 per cent of the voting or potential voting power of the
investee but concludes that it has significant influence;
IAS 28:37(d) d) the reasons why the presumption that an investor has significant influence is overcome if the investor holds, directly
or indirectly through subsidiaries, 20 per cent or more of the voting or potential voting power of the investee but
concludes that it does not have significant influence;
IAS 28:37(e) e) when the financial statements of an associate used in applying the equity method are as of a date or for a period
that is different from that of the investor:
i) the end of the reporting period of the financial statements of the associate; and
ii) the reason for using a different date or different period;
IAS 28:37(f) f) the nature and extent of any significant restrictions (e.g. resulting from borrowing arrangements or regulatory
requirements) on the ability of associates to transfer funds to the investor in the form of cash dividends, or
repayment of loans or advances;
IAS 28:1 Note: The disclosure requirements of IAS 28:37(f) apply to investments in associates by venture capital
organisations, mutual funds etc. that are generally scoped out of IAS 28 (see paragraph 1 of IAS 28
for details).
IAS 28:37(g) g) the unrecognised share of losses of an associate, both for the period and cumulatively, if an investor has
discontinued recognition of its share of losses of an associate;
IAS 28:37(h) h) the fact that an associate is not accounted for using the equity method in accordance with paragraph 13 of IAS 28;
and
IAS 28:37(i) i) summarised financial information of associates, either individually or in groups, that are not accounted for using the
equity method, including the amounts of total assets, total liabilities, revenues and profit or loss.
127
IAS 28 Investments in Associates

IAS 28:38 The following shall be separately disclosed:
a) the investor's share of the profit or loss of associates accounted for using the equity method;
b) the carrying amount of those investments; and
c) the investor's share of any discontinued operations of such associates.
IAS 28:39 The investor’s share of changes recognised in other comprehensive income by the associate shall be recognised by the
investor in other comprehensive income.
In accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, the investor shall disclose:
IAS 28:40(a) a) its share of the contingent liabilities of an associate incurred jointly with other investors; and
IAS 28:40(b) b) those contingent liabilities that arise because the investor is severally liable for all or part of the liabilities of the
associate.
IAS 28:41E If the entity has applied the amended paragraph 41B arising from Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010
(amendment to the transition requirements for amendments arising as a result of IAS 27(2008)) before 1 July 2010 it
shall disclose that fact.
128

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 29, which is applied to the
financial statements, including the consolidated financial statements, of any entity whose functional currency is the
currency of a hyperinflationary economy. The Standard does not establish an absolute rate at which hyperinflation is
deemed to arise – but cites a number of characteristics of the economic environment of a country which indicate the
presence of hyperinflation. Refer to the text of the Standard for details.
None
None
Gain or loss on net monetary position
IAS 29:9 The gain or loss on the net monetary position shall be included in profit or loss and separately disclosed.
IAS 29:27 Note: In a period of inflation, an entity holding an excess of monetary assets over monetary liabilities loses
purchasing power and an entity with an excess of monetary liabilities over monetary assets gains purchasing
power to the extent the assets and liabilities are not linked to a price level.
This gain or loss on the net monetary position may be derived as the difference resulting from the restatement
of non-monetary assets, owners’ equity and items in the statement of comprehensive income and the
adjustment of index linked assets and liabilities.
The gain or loss may also be estimated by applying the change in a general price index to the weighted
average for the period of the difference between monetary assets and monetary liabilities.
IAS 29:28 It may be helpful if other income and expense items, such as interest income and expense, and foreign exchange
differences related to invested or borrowed funds, which are also associated with the net monetary position, are
presented together with the gain or loss on net monetary position in the statement of comprehensive income.
IAS 29:28 Note: This presentation is encouraged, but not required.
Other disclosures
The following disclosures shall be made:
IAS 29:39(a) a) the fact that the financial statements and the corresponding figures for previous periods have been restated for the
changes in the general purchasing power of the functional currency and, as a result, are stated in terms of the
measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period;
IAS 29:39(b) b) whether the financial statements are based on a historical cost approach or a current cost approach; and
IAS 29:39(c) c) the identity and level of the price index at the end of the reporting period and the movement in the index during
the current and the previous reporting period.
129
IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies

accounting for interests in joint ventures and the reporting of joint venture assets, liabilities, income and expenses in the
financial statements of venturers and investors. Joint ventures can be structured in many different ways. The Standard
identifies three broad types of joint ventures – jointly controlled operations, jointly controlled assets and jointly
controlled entities. The primary issues are identifying whether joint control exists, identifying the type of joint venture
and the application of proportionate consolidation or the equity method of accounting.
None
1 January 2013, with earlier application permitted; and
requirements). Those amendments are applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2010, with earlier
Reporting formats for interests accounted for using proportionate consolidation
IAS 31:30,34 When proportionate consolidation is used by a venturer to account for its interest in a jointly controlled entity, one of
the following reporting formats shall be used:
a) the venturer may combine its share of each of the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of the jointly controlled
entity with the similar items, line by line, in its financial statements (e.g. it may combine its share of the jointly
controlled entity’s inventory with its inventory, and its share of the jointly controlled entity’s property, plant and
equipment with its property, plant and equipment); or
b) the venturer may include separate line items for its share of the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of the jointly
controlled entity in its financial statements (e.g. it may show its share of a current asset of the jointly controlled
entity separately as part of its current assets; it may show its share of the property, plant and equipment of the
jointly controlled entity separately as part of its property, plant and equipment).
IAS 31:34 Note: Both these reporting formats result in the reporting of identical amounts of profit or loss and of each major
classification of assets, liabilities, income and expenses.
IAS 31:35 Whichever format is used to give effect to proportionate consolidation, it is inappropriate to offset any assets or liabilities
by the deduction of other liabilities or assets, or any income or expenses by the deduction of other expenses or income,
unless a legal right of set-off exists and the offsetting represents the expectation as to the realisation of the asset or the
settlement of the liability.
Disclosure
A venturer shall disclose the aggregate amount of the following contingent liabilities, unless the probability of loss is
remote, separately from the amount of other contingent liabilities:
IAS 31:54(a) a) any contingent liabilities that the venturer has incurred in relation to its interests in joint ventures and its share in
each of the contingent liabilities that have been incurred jointly with other venturers;
IAS 31:54(b) b) its share of the contingent liabilities of the joint ventures themselves for which it is contingently liable; and
IAS 31:54(c) c) those contingent liabilities that arise because the venturer is contingently liable for the liabilities of the other
venturers of a joint venture.
A venturer shall disclose the aggregate amount of the following commitments in respect of its interests in joint ventures
separately from other commitments:
IAS 31:55(a) a) any capital commitments of the venturer in relation to its interests in joint ventures and its share in the capital
commitments that have been incurred jointly with other venturers; and
130
IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures

IAS 31:55(b) b) its share of the capital commitments of the joint ventures themselves.
IAS 31:56 A venturer shall disclose a listing and description of interests in significant joint ventures.
IAS 31:56 A venturer shall disclose the proportion of ownership interest held in each of its jointly controlled entities.
IAS 31:56 A venturer that recognises its interests in jointly controlled entities using the line-by-line reporting format for
proportionate consolidation or the equity method, shall disclose the aggregate amounts of each of current assets, long-
term assets, current liabilities, long-term liabilities, income and expenses related to its interests in joint ventures.
IAS 31:1 Note: The disclosure requirements of paragraphs 55 and 56 of IAS 31 also apply to interests in jointly controlled
entities held by venture capital organisations, mutual funds etc. that are generally scoped out of IAS 31
(see paragraph 1 of IAS 31 for details).
IAS 31:57 A venturer shall disclose the method it uses to recognise its interests in jointly controlled entities.
IAS 31:58D If the entity has applied the amended paragraph 58A arising from Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010
(amendment to the transition requirements for amendments arising as a result of IAS 27(2008)) before 1 July 2010 it
shall disclose that fact.

This section of the checklist addresses IAS 32, which prescribes the presentation of financial instruments.
The presentation requirements apply to the classification of financial instruments, from the perspective of the issuer, into
financial assets, financial liabilities and equity instruments; the classification of related interest, dividends, losses and
gains; and the circumstances in which financial assets and financial liabilities should be offset.
The Application Guidance issued as an integral part of IAS 32 explains the application of particular aspects of the
Standard. Additional references are provided in this section to the relevant paragraphs of the Application Guidance
(AG). The Illustrative Examples (IE) accompanying IAS 32 provide additional guidance.
For users’ convenience, the requirements under the heading ‘Liabilities and Equity’ in this section are shown separately
for those entities that have adopted the amendments and for those entities that have not yet adopted the
amendments.
None
• Classification of Rights Issues (Amendment to IAS 32) amended paragraphs 11 and 16 of IAS 32. The amendments
are applicable for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 February 2010. Earlier application is permitted;
1 January 2013, with earlier application permitted; and
Liabilities and equity
IAS 32:15 On initial recognition, the issuer of a financial instrument shall classify the instrument, or its component parts, as a
IE 2 to IE 31 financial liability, a financial asset or an equity instrument.
Note: Detailed requirements for the classification of financial instruments and their component parts are set out
below.
IAS 32:15 The issuer shall classify a financial instrument in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangement rather
than the legal form, and in accordance with the definitions of a financial liability, a financial asset and an equity
instrument.
IAS 32:13 Note: ‘Contract’ and ‘contractual’ refer to an agreement between two or more parties that has clear economic
consequences that the parties have little, if any, discretion to avoid, usually because the agreement is
enforceable by law.
IAS 32:16 When an issuer applies the definitions in paragraph 11 of IAS 32 to determine whether a financial instrument is an
AG 25 to AG 29 equity instrument rather than a financial liability, the instrument is an equity instrument if, and only if, both conditions
IE 2 to IE 31 (a) and (b) below are met:
a) the instrument includes no contractual obligation:
IAS 32:16(a)(i) i) to deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity: or
IAS 32:16(a)(ii) ii) to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under conditions that are potentially
unfavourable to the issuer; and
b) if the instrument will or may be settled in the issuer’s own equity instruments, it is:
IAS 32:16(b)(i) i) a non-derivative instrument that includes no contractual obligation for the issuer to deliver a variable number of
its own equity instruments; or
132
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation

IAS 32:16(b)(ii) ii) a derivative that will be settled only by the issuer exchanging a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset
for a fixed number of its own equity instruments. For this purpose, the issuer’s own equity instruments do not
include instruments that have all the features and meet the conditions described in paragraphs 16A and 16B or
paragraphs 16C and 16D of IAS 32 (see below), or instruments that are contracts for the future receipt or
delivery of the issuer’s own equity instruments.
IAS 32:16(b)(ii) ii) A derivative that will be settled only by the issuer exchanging a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset
for a fixed number of its own equity instruments. For this purpose, rights, options or warrants to acquire a fixed
number of the entity’s own equity instruments for a fixed amount of any currency are equity instruments if the
entity offers the rights, options or warrants pro rata to all of its existing owners of the same class of its own
non-derivative equity instruments. Also, for these purposes the issuer’s own equity instruments do not include
instruments that have all the features and meet the conditions described in paragraphs 16A and 16B or
paragraphs 16C and 16D of IAS 32 (see below), or instruments that are contracts for the future receipt or
delivery of the issuer’s own equity instruments.
Note: Paragraph 16(b)(ii) was amended by Classification of Rights Issues (Amendment to IAS 32) issued in October
2009. An entity shall apply that amendment for annual periods beginning on or after 1 February 2010.
Earlier application is permitted.
Notes:
No contractual obligation to deliver cash or another asset
IAS 32:17 to 20 1) With the exception of the circumstances described in paragraphs 16A and 16B (or paragraphs 16C and 16D)(see
below), a critical feature in differentiating a financial liability from an equity instrument is the existence of a
contractual obligation of one party (the issuer) either to deliver cash or another financial asset to another party (the
holder) or to exchange financial assets or liabilities with the holder under conditions that are potentially
unfavourable to the issuer. For example, the issuer of an equity instrument does not usually have a contractual
obligation to make dividend distributions and the instrument is therefore equity because the entity cannot be
required to deliver cash or another financial asset.
2) If an entity does not have an unconditional right to avoid delivering cash or another financial asset to settle a
contractual obligation, the obligation meets the definition of a financial liability, except for those instruments
classified as equity instruments in accordance with paragraphs 16A and 16B or paragraphs 16C and 16D. A
financial instrument that does not explicitly establish a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial
asset may establish an obligation indirectly through its terms and conditions.
Settlement in the entity’s own equity instruments
IAS 32:22, 22A 3) With the exception of puttable financial instruments with the features and meeting the conditions described in
paragraphs 16A and 16B (or 16C and 16D) (see below), a contract that will be settled by the entity receiving or
delivering a fixed number of its own equity instruments in exchange for a fixed amount of cash or another financial
asset is an equity instrument. Exposure to changes in the fair value of such a contract, arising from variations in
market interest rates that do not affect the amount of cash /financial asset /equity instruments to be received or
delivered, on settlement of the contract, do not preclude the contract from being an equity instrument. Any
consideration received or paid is added or deducted directly to/from equity.
IAS 32:23, 24 4) With the exception of the circumstances described in paragraphs 16A and 16B (or paragraphs 16C and 16D) (see
below) a contract that contains an obligation for an entity to purchase its own equity instruments for cash or
another financial asset gives rise to a financial liability for the present value of the redemption amount. A contract
that will be settled by the entity delivering or receiving a fixed number of its own equity instruments in exchange for
a variable amount of cash or another financial asset is a financial asset or liability. An example is a contract for the
entity to deliver 100 of its own equity instruments in return for an amount of cash calculated to equal the value of
100 ounces of gold.

Puttable instruments
IAS 32:16A-16F A puttable financial instrument (i.e. a financial instrument that gives the holder the right to put the instrument back to
the issuer for cash or another financial asset or automatically put back to the issuer on the occurrence of an uncertain
future event or the death or retirement of the instrument holder) includes a contractual obligation for the issuer to
repurchase or redeem the instrument for cash or another financial asset on exercise of the put. As an exception to the
definition of a financial liability, an instruments that includes such an obligation is classified as an equity instrument if it
contains all of the following features:
IAS 32:16A(a) a) it entitles the holder to a pro rata share of the entity’s net assets in the event of the entity’s liquidation;
Note: The entity’s net assets are those assets that remain after deducting all other claims on its assets. A pro rata
share is determined by:
• dividing the entity’s net assets on liquidation into units of equal amount; and
• multiplying that amount by the number of the units held by the financial instrument holder.
IAS 32:16A(b) b) the instrument is in the class of instruments that is subordinate to all other classes of instruments;
Note: To be in such a class, the instrument:
• has no priority over other claims to the assets of the entity on liquidation; and
• does not need to be converted into another instrument before it is in the class of instruments that is
subordinate to all other classes of instruments.
IAS 32:16A(c) c) all financial instruments in the class of instruments that is subordinate to all other classes of instruments have
identical features (e.g. they must all be puttable, and the formula or other method used to calculate the repurchase
or redemption price is the same for all instruments in that class);
IAS 32:16A(d) d) apart from the contractual obligation for the issuer to repurchase or redeem the instrument for cash or another
financial asset, the instrument does not include any contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset
to another entity, or to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under conditions that are
potentially unfavourable to the entity, and it is not a contract that will or may be settled in the entity’s own equity
instruments as set out in paragraph 9(b) of IAS 32 which specifies the definition of a financial liability; and
IAS 32:16A(e) e) the total expected cash flows attributable to the instrument over the life of the instrument are based substantially on
the profit or loss, the change in the recognised net assets or the change in the fair value of the recognised and
unrecognised net assets of the entity over the life of the instrument (excluding any effects of the instrument).
IAS 32:16B For an instrument to be classified as an equity instrument, in addition to the instrument having all the features described
in paragraph 16A of IAS 32 (see above), the issuer must have no other financial instrument or contract that has:
IAS 32:16B(a) a) total cash flows based substantially on the profit or loss, the change in the recognised net assets or the change in
the fair value of the recognised and unrecognised net assets of the entity (excluding any effects of such instrument
or contract); and
IAS 32:16B(b) b) the effect of substantially restricting or fixing the residual return to the puttable instrument holders.
IAS 32:16B Note: For the purposes of applying this condition, the entity shall not consider non-financial contracts with a holder
of an instrument described in paragraph 16A that have contractual terms and conditions that are similar to the
contractual terms and conditions of an equivalent contract that might occur between a non-instrument holder
and the issuing entity. If the entity cannot determine that this condition is met, it shall not classify the puttable
instrument as an equity instrument.
134

Instruments, or components of instruments, that impose on the entity an obligation to deliver to another
party a pro rata share of the net assets of the entity only on liquidation
IAS 32:16C Some financial instruments include a contractual obligation for the issuing entity to deliver to another entity a pro rata
share of its net assets only on liquidation. The obligation arises because liquidation either is certain to occur and outside
the control of the entity (e.g. a limited life entity) or is uncertain to occur but is at the option of the instrument holder.
As an exception to the definition of a financial liability, an instrument that includes such an obligation is classified as an
equity instrument if it has all of the following features:
IAS 32:16C(a) a) it entitles the holder to a pro rata share of the entity’s net assets in the event of the entity’s liquidation;
Note: The entity’s net assets are those assets that remain after deducting all other claims on its assets. A pro rata
share is determined by:
• dividing the entity’s net assets on liquidation into units of equal amount; and
• multiplying that amount by the number of the units held by the financial instrument holder.
IAS 32:16C(b) b) the instrument is in the class of instruments that is subordinate to all other classes of instruments; and
Note: To be in such a class, the instrument:
• has no priority over other claims to the assets of the entity on liquidation; and
• does not need to be converted into another instrument before it is in the class of instruments that is
subordinate to all other classes of instruments.
IAS 32:16C(c) c) all financial instruments in the class of instruments that is subordinate to all other classes of instruments must have
an identical contractual obligation for the issuing entity to deliver a pro rata share of its net assets on liquidation.
IAS 32:16D For an instrument to be classified as an equity instrument, in addition to the instrument having all the features described
in paragraph 16C of IAS 32, the issuer must have no other financial instrument or contract that has:
IAS 32:16D(a) a) total cash flows based substantially on the profit or loss, the change in the recognised net assets or the change in
the fair value of the recognised and unrecognised net assets of the entity (excluding any effects of such instrument
or contract); and
IAS 32:16D(b) b) the effect of substantially restricting or fixing the residual return to the instrument holders.
IAS 32:16D Note: For the purposes of applying this condition, the entity shall not consider non-financial contracts with a holder
of an instrument described in paragraph 16C of IAS 32 that have contractual terms and conditions that are
similar to the contractual terms and conditions of an equivalent contract that might occur between a
non-instrument holder and the issuing entity. If the entity cannot determine that this condition is met, it shall
not classify the instrument as an equity instrument.
Reclassification of puttable instruments and instruments that impose on the entity an obligation to deliver
to another party a pro rata share of the net assets of the entity only on liquidation
IAS 32:16E An entity shall classify a financial instrument as an equity instrument in accordance with paragraphs 16A and 16B or
paragraphs 16C and 16D of IAS 32 from the date when the instrument has all the features and meets the conditions set
out in those paragraphs. An entity shall reclassify a financial instrument from the date when the instrument ceases to
have all the features or meet all the conditions set out in those paragraphs.
IAS 32:16E Note: For example, if an entity redeems all its issued non-puttable instruments and any puttable instruments that
remain outstanding have all of the features and meet all the conditions in paragraphs 16A and 16B of IAS 32,
the entity shall reclassify the puttable instruments as equity instruments from the date when it redeems the non-
puttable instruments.

IAS 32:16F An entity shall account as follows for the reclassification of an instrument in accordance with paragraph 16E of IAS 32:
IAS 32:16F(a) a) it shall reclassify an equity instrument as a financial liability from the date when the instrument ceases to have all of
the features or meet the conditions in paragraphs 16A and 16B or paragraphs 16C and 16D of IAS 32. The financial
liability shall be measured at the instrument’s fair value at the date of reclassification. The entity shall recognise in
equity any difference between the carrying value of the equity instrument and the fair value of the financial liability
at the date of reclassification; and
IAS 32:16F(b) b) it shall reclassify a financial liability as equity from the date when the instrument has all of the features and meets
the conditions set out in paragraphs 16A and 16B or paragraphs 16C and 16D of IAS 32. An equity instrument shall
be measured at the carrying value of the financial liability at the date of reclassification.
Compound financial instruments
IAS 32:28 The issuer of a non-derivative financial instrument shall evaluate the terms of the financial instrument to determine
whether it contains both a liability and an equity component. Such components shall be classified separately as financial
liabilities, financial assets or equity instruments in accordance with paragraph 15 of IAS 32 (see above).
Notes:
IAS 32:29 1) An entity recognises separately the components of a financial instrument that (a) creates a financial liability of the
entity and (b) grants an option to the holder of the instrument to convert it into an equity instrument of the entity.
For example, a bond or similar instrument convertible by the holder into a fixed number of ordinary shares of the
entity is a compound financial instrument. From the perspective of the entity, such an instrument comprises two
components: a financial liability (a contractual arrangement to deliver cash or another financial asset) and an
equity instrument (a call option granting the holder the right, for a specified period of time, to convert it into a fixed
number of ordinary shares of the entity). The economic effect of issuing such an instrument is substantially the
same as issuing simultaneously a debt instrument with an early settlement provision and warrants to purchase
ordinary shares, or issuing a debt instrument with detachable share purchase warrants. Accordingly, in all cases,
the entity presents the liability and equity components separately in its statement of financial position.
IAS 32:30 2) Classification of the liability and equity components of a convertible instrument is not revised as a result of a
change in the likelihood that a conversion option will be exercised, even when exercise of the option may appear
to have become economically advantageous to some holders.
IAS 32:31 3) IAS 39 deals with the measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. Equity instruments are instruments
that evidence a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all of its liabilities. Therefore, when the
initial carrying amount of a compound financial instrument is allocated to its equity and liability components, the
equity component is assigned the residual amount after deducting from the fair value of the instrument as a whole
the amount separately determined for the liability component. The value of any derivative features (such as a call
option) embedded in the compound financial instrument other than the equity component (such as an equity
conversion option) is included in the liability component. The sum of the carrying amounts assigned to the liability
and equity components on initial recognition is always equal to the fair value that would be ascribed to the
instrument as a whole. No gain or loss arises from initially recognising the components of the instrument
separately.
IAS 32:31 3) IFRS 9 and IAS 39 deal with the measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities respectively. Equity instruments
are instruments that evidence a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all of its liabilities.
Therefore, when the initial carrying amount of a compound financial instrument is allocated to its equity and
liability components, the equity component is assigned the residual amount after deducting from the fair value of
the instrument as a whole the amount separately determined for the liability component. The value of any
derivative features (such as a call option) embedded in the compound financial instrument other than the equity
component (such as an equity conversion option) is included in the liability component. The sum of the carrying
amounts assigned to the liability and equity components on initial recognition is always equal to the fair value that
would be ascribed to the instrument as a whole. No gain or loss arises from initially recognising the components of
the instrument separately.
Note: Paragraph 31 of IAS 32 (see above) was amended due to IFRS 9 issued in November 2009. An entity shall
apply the amendment when it applies IFRS 9.
IAS 32:32 4) Under the approach described in paragraph 31 of IAS 32 (see above), the issuer of a bond convertible into ordinary
shares first determines the carrying amount of the liability component by measuring the fair value of a similar
liability (including any embedded non-equity derivative features) that does not have an associated equity
component. The carrying amount of the equity instrument represented by the option to convert the instrument into
ordinary shares is then determined by deducting the fair value of the financial liability from the fair value of the
compound financial instrument as a whole.
136

IAS 32:AG 36 Treasury shares
Where the entity (or another member of the consolidated group) has reacquired (acquired) the entity’s own equity
instruments (‘treasury shares’):
IAS 32:33 a) those treasury shares shall be deducted from equity;
IAS 32:33 b) no gain or loss shall be recognised in profit or loss on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of an entity’s own
equity instruments;
IAS 32:33 c) consideration paid or received shall be recognised directly in equity;
IAS 32:34 d) the amount of treasury shares held is disclosed separately, either in the statement of financial position or in the
notes, in accordance with IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements; and
IAS 32:34 e) an entity makes appropriate disclosures in accordance with IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures if the entity reacquires
its own equity instruments from related parties.
IAS 32:AG 37 Interest, dividends, losses and gains
IAS 32:35 Interest, dividends, losses and gains relating to a financial instrument or a component of a financial instrument that is a
financial liability shall be recognised as income or expense in profit or loss.
IAS 32:35 Distributions to holders of an equity instrument shall be debited by the entity directly to equity, net of any related
income tax benefit.
IAS 32:36 Note: The classification of a financial instrument as a financial liability or an equity instrument determines whether
interest, dividends, losses and gains relating to that instrument are recognised as income or expense in profit or
loss. Thus, dividend payments on shares wholly recognised as liabilities are recognised as expenses in the same
way as interest on a bond. Similarly, gains and losses associated with redemptions or refinancings of financial
liabilities are recognised in profit or loss, whereas redemptions or refinancings of equity instruments are
recognised as changes in equity. Changes in the fair value of an equity instrument are not recognised in the
IAS 32:35 Transaction costs of an equity transaction shall be accounted for as a deduction from equity, net of any related income
tax benefit.
IAS 32:37 The costs of an equity transaction that is abandoned are recognised as an expense.
IAS 32:38 Transaction costs that relate to the issue of a compound financial instrument are allocated to the liability and equity
components of the instrument in proportion to the allocation of the proceeds.
IAS 32:38 Transaction costs that relate jointly to more than one transaction (e.g. costs of a concurrent offering of some shares and
a stock exchange listing of other shares) are allocated to the transactions using a basis of allocation that is rational and
consistent with similar transactions.
IAS 32:39 The amount of transaction costs accounted for as a deduction from equity in the period is disclosed separately under
IAS 1.
IAS 32:39 The related amount of income taxes recognised directly in equity is included in the aggregate amount of current and
deferred income tax credited or charged to equity that is disclosed under IAS 12 Income Taxes.
IAS 32:40 Dividends that are classified as an expense may be presented in the statement of comprehensive income or separate
income statement (if presented) either with interest on other liabilities or as a separate item.
IAS 32:40 Note: In addition to the requirements of IAS 32, disclosure of interest and dividends is subject to the requirements of
IAS 1 and IFRS 7. In some circumstances, because of the differences between interest and dividends with
respect to matters such as tax deductibility, it is desirable to disclose them separately in the statement of
comprehensive income or separate income statement (if presented). Disclosures of the tax effects are made in
accordance with IAS 12.
IAS 32:41 Gains and losses related to changes in the carrying amount of a financial liability are recognised as income or expense in
profit or loss even when they relate to an instrument that includes a right to the residual interest in the assets of the
entity in exchange for cash or another financial asset (see paragraph 18(b) of IAS 32).

IAS 32:41 Note: Under IAS 1 the entity presents any gain or loss arising from remeasurement of such an instrument separately in
the statement of comprehensive income when it is relevant in explaining the entity’s performance.
IAS 32: Offsetting a financial asset and a financial liability
AG38 to AG39
A financial asset and a financial liability shall be offset and the net amount presented in the statement of financial
position when, and only when, an entity:
IAS 32:42(a) a) currently has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts; and
IAS 32:42(b) b) intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Notes:
IAS 32:42 1) In accounting for a transfer of a financial asset that does not qualify for derecognition, the entity shall not offset
the transferred asset and the associated liability (see paragraph 36 of IAS 39).
IAS 32:44 2) Offsetting does not give rise to recognition of a gain or loss.
IAS 32:49 3) The conditions for offsetting set out in paragraph 42 of IAS 32 (see above) are generally not satisfied and offsetting
is therefore inappropriate when:
• several different financial instruments are used to emulate the features of a single financial instrument (a
‘synthetic’ financial instrument);
• financial assets and financial liabilities arise from financial instruments having the same primary risk exposure
but involve different counterparties;
• financial or other assets are pledged as collateral for non-recourse financial liabilities;
• financial assets are set aside in trust by a debtor for the purpose of discharging an obligation without those
assets having been accepted by the creditor in settlement of the obligation; or
• obligations incurred as a result of events giving rise to losses are expected to be recovered from a third party by
virtue of a claim made under an insurance contract.
IAS 32:50 4) An entity that undertakes a number of financial instrument transactions with a single counterparty may enter into a
‘master netting arrangement’ which provides for a single net settlement of all financial instruments covered by the
agreement in the event of default on, or termination of, any one contract. A master netting arrangement does not
provide a basis for offsetting unless both of the criteria in paragraph 42 of IAS 32 (see above) are satisfied. When
financial assets and financial liabilities subject to a master netting arrangement are not offset, the effect of the
arrangement on an entity’s exposure to credit risk is disclosed in accordance with paragraph 36 of IFRS 7 (see
relevant section of this checklist).
IAS 32:97E If the entity has applied the amended paragraphs 11 and 16 arising from Classification of Rights Issues issued in October
2009 before 1 February 2010 it shall disclose that fact.
138

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 33, which prescribes
principles for the determination and presentation of earnings per share (EPS).
IAS 33 shall be applied by entities whose ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares are publicly traded and by entities
that are filed or in the process of issuing ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares in public markets. An entity that
discloses EPS shall calculate and disclose EPS in accordance with the Standard.
When an entity presents both consolidated financial statements and separate financial statements prepared in
accordance with IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, the disclosures required by IAS 33 need to be
presented only on the basis of the consolidated information. An entity that chooses to disclose EPS based on its
separate financial statements shall present such EPS information only in its separate statement of comprehensive
income. An entity shall not present such EPS information in the consolidated financial statements.
The Illustrative Examples accompanying IAS 33 include a comprehensive example of the statement of comprehensive
income presentation of EPS.
None
None
IAS 33:3 An entity that discloses earnings per share shall calculate and disclose earnings per share in accordance with IAS 33.
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, it presents earnings per share only in that separate statement.
Retrospective adjustments
IAS 33:64 If the number of ordinary or potential ordinary shares outstanding increases as a result of a capitalisation or bonus issue
or share split, or decreases as a result of a reverse share split, the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for
all periods presented shall be adjusted retrospectively.
IAS 33:64 If these changes occur after the reporting period but before the financial statements are authorised for issue, the per
share calculations for those and any prior period financial statements shall be based on the new number of shares.
IAS 33:64 The fact that per share calculations reflect such changes in the number of shares shall be disclosed.
IAS 33:64 Basic and diluted earnings per share for all periods presented shall be adjusted for the effects of errors and adjustments
resulting from changes in accounting policies accounted for retrospectively.
Presentation
IAS 33:66 An entity shall present earnings per share information (see detailed requirements below) separately for each class of
ordinary shares that has a different right to share in profit for the period.
IAS 33:66 An entity shall present in the statement of comprehensive income:
a) basic and diluted earnings per share for profit or loss from continuing operations attributable to the ordinary equity
holders of the parent entity; and
b) basic and diluted earnings per share for profit or loss for the period attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the
parent entity.
IAS 33:67 Note: Earnings per share is presented for every period for which a statement of comprehensive income is presented.
If diluted earnings per share is reported for at least one period, it shall be reported for all periods presented,
even if it equals basic earnings per share. If basic and diluted earnings per share are equal, dual presentation
can be accomplished in one line in the statement of comprehensive income.
IAS 33:66 An entity shall present basic and diluted earnings per share with equal prominence for all periods presented.
139
IAS 33 Earnings per Share

IAS 33:67A Note: If an entity presents the components of profit or loss in a separate income statement as described in
paragraph 81 of IAS 1, it presents basic and diluted earnings per share, as required in paragraphs 66 and 67 of
IAS 33, in that separate statement.
IAS 33:68 An entity that reports a discontinued operation shall disclose the basic and diluted amounts per share for the
discontinued operation either in the statement of comprehensive income or in the notes.
paragraph 81 of IAS 1, it presents basic and diluted earnings per share for the discontinued operation, as
required in paragraph 68 of IAS 33, in that separate statement or in the notes.
IAS 33:69 An entity shall present basic and diluted earnings per share, even if the amounts disclosed are negative (i.e. a loss per
share).
Disclosure
An entity shall disclose the following:
IAS 33:70(a) a) the amounts used as the numerators in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share, and a reconciliation of
those amounts to profit or loss attributable to the parent entity for the period;
IAS 33:70(a) Note: The reconciliation shall include the individual effect of each class of instruments that affects earnings
per share.
IAS 33:70(b) b) the weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator in calculating basic and diluted earnings
per share, and a reconciliation of these denominators to each other;
IAS 33:70(b) Note: The reconciliation shall include the individual effect of each class of instruments that affects earnings
per share.
IAS 33:70(c) c) instruments (including contingently issuable shares) that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the
future, but were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they are anti-dilutive for the
period(s) presented; and
IAS 33:70(d) d) a description of ordinary share transactions or potential ordinary share transactions, other than those accounted for
in accordance with paragraph 64 of IAS 33 (see above), that occur after the reporting period and that would have
changed significantly the number of ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares outstanding at the end of the
period if those transactions had occurred before the end of the reporting period.
IAS 33:71 Note: Examples of such transactions include:
a) the issue of shares for cash;
b) the issue of shares when the proceeds are used to repay debt or preference shares outstanding at the
end of the reporting period;
c) the redemption of ordinary shares outstanding;
d) the conversion or exercise of potential ordinary shares, outstanding at the end of the reporting period,
into ordinary shares;
e) the issue of warrants, options or convertible instruments; and
f) the achievement of conditions that would result in the issue of contingently issuable shares.
IAS 33:72 Entities are encouraged (if not otherwise required) to disclose the terms and conditions of financial instruments and other
contracts generating potential ordinary shares, which affect the measurement of basic and diluted earnings per share.
IAS 33:72 Note: These terms and conditions may determine whether or not any potential ordinary shares are dilutive and, if so,
the effect on the weighted average number of shares outstanding and any consequent adjustments to the net
profit or loss attributable to ordinary equity holders. Whether or not the disclosure of the terms and conditions
is required by IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures such disclosure is encouraged by IAS 33.
140

IAS 33:73 If an entity discloses, in addition to basic and diluted earnings per share, amounts per share using a reported component
of the statement of comprehensive income other than one required by IAS 33:
a) such amounts shall be calculated using the weighted average number of ordinary shares determined in accordance
with IAS 33;
b) basic and diluted per share amounts shall be disclosed with equal prominence;
c) the amounts shall be presented in the notes;
d) an entity shall indicate the basis on which the numerator(s) is (are) determined, including whether amounts per
share are before or after tax; and
e) if a component of the statement of comprehensive income is used that is not reported as a line item in the
statement of comprehensive income, a reconciliation shall be provided between the component used and a line
item that is reported in the statement of comprehensive income.
IAS 33:73A Note: Paragraph 73 of IAS 33 applies also to an entity that discloses, in addition to basic and diluted earnings
per share, amounts per share using a reported component of the separate income statement (as described
in paragraph 81 of IAS 1), other than one required by IAS 33.

This section of the checklist addresses IAS 34 which prescribes the accounting treatment for interim financial reporting.
The principal issues are the minimum content required for an interim financial report and the recognition and
measurement principles for complete or condensed interim financial reports.
IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards includes additional disclosure requirements for
interim periods covered by an entity’s first IFRS financial statements. See relevant section of this checklist for details.
Where an entity elects to present a complete set of financial statements at the end of the interim reporting period,
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements will apply to those financial statements. Even where a condensed interim
financial report is prepared, certain requirements of IAS 1) apply. The sections applicable to condensed interim financial
reports, as set out in paragraph 4 of IAS 1, deal with:
• fair presentation and compliance with IFRSs;
• going concern;
• accrual basis of accounting;
• materiality and aggregation; and
• offsetting.
None
At 30 September 2010, the following Standard (issued but not yet effective) adds new paragraphs to IAS 34 or amends
existing paragraphs in IAS 34:
• Improvements to IFRSs (issued in May 2010) amended IAS 34. Those amendments are applicable for annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2011 with earlier application permitted.
Minimum components of an interim financial report
IAS 34:6 Note: IAS 34 defines the minimum content of an interim financial report as including condensed financial statements
and selected explanatory notes. The interim financial report is intended to provide an update on the latest
complete set of annual financial statements. Accordingly, it focuses on new activities, events and
circumstances, and does not duplicate information previously reported.
An interim financial report shall include, at a minimum, the following components:
IAS 34:8(a) a) a condensed statement of financial position;
IAS 34:8(b) b) a condensed statement of comprehensive income, presented as either;
i) a condensed single statement; or
ii) a condensed separate income statement and a condensed statement of comprehensive income;
IAS 34:8(c) c) a condensed statement of changes in equity:
IAS 34:8(d) d) a condensed statement of cash flows; and
IAS 34:8(e) e) selected explanatory notes.
paragraph 81 of IAS 1, it presents interim condensed information from that separate statement.
Form and content of interim financial statements
IAS 34:9 If an entity publishes a complete set of financial statements in its interim financial report, the form and content of those
statements shall conform to the requirements of IAS 1 for a complete set of financial statements.
142
IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting

Note: Even where the entity prepares a condensed interim report, some sections of IAS 1 apply – see the introductory
notes at the beginning of this section.
IAS 34:10 If an entity publishes a set of condensed financial statements in its interim financial report, those condensed statements
shall include, at a minimum, each of the headings and subtotals that were included in the entity’s most recent annual
financial statements and the selected explanatory notes as required by IAS 34.
IAS 34:10 Additional line items or notes shall be included if their omission would make the condensed interim financial statements
misleading.
IAS 34:7 Note: Where the entity has opted to publish a complete set of financial statements for the interim period, the
recognition and measurement guidance in IAS 34 applies to those financial statements, and such statements
should include all of the disclosures required by IAS 34 (particularly the selected note disclosures in
paragraph 16 of IAS 34) as well as those required by other IFRSs.
IAS 34:11 In the statement that presents the components of profit or loss for an interim period, an entity shall present basic and
diluted earnings per share for that period when the entity is within scope of IAS 33.
paragraph 81 of IAS 1, it presents basic and diluted earnings per share in that separate statement.
IAS 34:14 An interim report is prepared on a consolidated basis if the entity’s most recent annual financial statements were
consolidated statements.
IAS 34:14 Note: The parent’s separate financial statements are not consistent or comparable with the consolidated statements
in the most recent annual financial report. If an entity’s annual financial report included the parent’s separate
financial statements in addition to consolidated financial statements, IAS 34 neither requires nor prohibits the
inclusion of the parent’s separate statements in the entity’s interim financial report.
Significant events and transactions
This section of IAS 34 was amended by Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010 to provide clarification regarding the
principles underlying the disclosure requirements in the Standard.
Although the title of the section has been changed (from ‘Selected explanatory notes’ to ‘Significant events and
transactions’) and the requirements rearranged, there has been little substantive change.
The text below has been rewritten and re-ordered in line with the revised text of the Standard. The amendments are
effective for annual periods beginning for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011, with earlier application
permitted.
Notes:
IAS 34:15 1) An entity shall include in its interim financial report an explanation of events and transactions that are significant to
an understanding of the changes in financial position and performance of the entity since the end of the last
annual reporting period. Information disclosed in relation to those events and transactions shall update the
relevant information presented in the most recent annual financial report.
IAS 34:15A 2) A user of an entity’s interim financial report will have access to the most recent annual financial report of that
entity. Therefore, it is unnecessary for the notes to an interim financial report to provide relatively insignificant
updates to the information that was reported in the notes in the most recent annual financial report.
IAS 34:15B The following is a list of events and transactions for which disclosures would be required if they are significant: the
list is not exhaustive:
a) the write-down of inventories to net realisable value and the reversal of such a write-down;
b) recognition of a loss from the impairment of financial assets, property, plant and equipment, intangible assets,
or other assets, and the reversal of such an impairment loss;
c) the reversal of any provisions for the costs of restructuring;
d) acquisitions and disposals of items of property, plant and equipment;

e) commitments for the purchase of property, plant and equipment;
f) litigation settlements;
g) corrections of prior period errors;
h) the write-down of inventories to net realisable value and the reversal of such a write-down;
i) recognition of a loss from the impairment of financial assets, property, plant and equipment, intangible assets,
or other assets, and the reversal of such an impairment loss;
j) the reversal of any provisions for the costs of restructuring;
k) acquisitions and disposals of items of property, plant and equipment;
l) commitments for the purchase of property, plant and equipment;
m) litigation settlements;
n) corrections of prior period errors;
o) changes in the business or economic circumstances that affect the fair value of the entity’s financial assets and
financial liabilities, whether those assets or liabilities are recognised at fair value or amortised cost;
p) any loan default or breach of a loan agreement that has not been remedied on or before the end of the
reporting period;
q) related party transactions;
r) transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy used in measuring the fair value of financial instruments;
s) changes in the classification of financial assets as a result of a change in the purpose or use of those assets;
and
t) changes in contingent liabilities or contingent assets.
IAS 34:15C When an event or transaction is significant to an understanding of the changes in an entity’s financial position or
performance since the last annual reporting period, its interim financial report should provide an explanation of and an
update to the relevant information included in the financial statements of the last annual reporting period.
Note: Individual IFRSs provide guidance regarding disclosure requirements for many of the items listed in paragraph
15B of IAS 34 (above).
Other disclosures
IAS 34:16A In addition to disclosing significant events and transactions in accordance with paragraphs 15-15C of IAS 34 (see above),
an entity shall include the following information, in the notes to its interim financial statements, if not disclosed
elsewhere in the interim financial report. The information shall normally be reported on a financial year-to-date basis.
IAS 34:16A(a) a) a statement that the same accounting policies and methods of computation are followed in the interim financial
statements as compared with the most recent annual financial statements or, if those policies or methods have been
changed, a description of the nature and effect of the change;
IAS 34:16A(b) b) explanatory comments about the seasonality or cyclicality of interim operations;
IAS 34:16A(c) c) the nature and amount of items affecting assets, liabilities, equity, net income or cash flows that are unusual
because of their nature, size or incidence;
IAS 34:16A(d) d) the nature and amount of changes in estimates of amounts reported in prior interim periods of the current financial
year or changes in estimates of amounts reported in prior financial years;
IAS 34:16A(e) e) issues, repurchases and repayments of debt and equity securities;
IAS 34:16A(f) f) dividends paid (aggregate or per share) separately for ordinary shares and other shares;
144

IAS 34:16A(g) g) the following segment information (disclosure of segment information is required in an entity’s interim financial
report only if IFRS 8 Operating Segments requires that entity to disclose segment information in its annual financial
statements):
i) revenues from external customers, if included in the measure of segment profit or loss reviewed by the chief
operating decision maker or otherwise regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker;
ii) intersegment revenues, if included in the measure of segment profit or loss reviewed by the chief operating
decision maker or otherwise regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker;
iii) a measure of segment profit or loss;
iv) total assets for which there has been a material change from the amount disclosed in the last annual financial
statements;
v) a description of differences from the last annual financial statements in the basis of segmentation or in the basis
of measurement of segment profit or loss;
vi) a reconciliation of the total of the reportable segments’ measures of profit or loss to the entity’s profit or loss
before tax expense (tax income) and discontinued operations. However, if an entity allocates to reportable
segments items such as tax expense (tax income), the entity may reconcile the total of the segments’ measures
of profit or loss to profit or loss after those items. Material reconciling items shall be separately identified and
described in that reconciliation;
IAS 34:16A(h) h) events after the interim period that have not been reflected in the financial statements for the interim period;
IAS 34:16A(i) i) the effect of changes in the composition of the entity during the interim period, including business combinations,
obtaining or losing control of subsidiaries and long-term investments, restructurings, and discontinued operations.
In the case of business combinations, the entity shall disclose the information required by IFRS 3 Business
Combinations.
Disclosure of compliance with IFRSs
IAS 34:19 If an entity’s interim financial report is in compliance with IAS 34, that fact shall be disclosed.
IAS 34:19 Note: An interim financial report shall not be described as complying with IFRSs unless it complies with all of the
requirements of IFRSs.
Periods for which interim financial statements are required to be presented
Interim reports shall include interim financial statements (condensed or complete) for periods as follows:
IAS 34:20(a) a) statement of financial position as of the end of the current interim period and a comparative statement of financial
position as of the end of the immediately preceding financial year;
IAS 34:20(b) b) statements of comprehensive income for the current interim period and cumulatively for the current financial year
to date, with comparative statements of comprehensive income for the comparable interim periods (current and
year-to-date) of the immediately preceding financial year;
IAS 34:20(b) Note: As permitted by IAS 1, an interim report may present for each period either a single statement of
comprehensive income, or a statement displaying components of profit or loss (separate income statement)
and a second statement beginning with profit or loss and displaying components of other comprehensive
income (statement of comprehensive income).
IAS 34:20(c) c) statement of changes in equity cumulatively for the current financial year to date, with a comparative statement for
the comparable year-to-date period of the immediately preceding financial year; and.
IAS 34:20(d) d) statement of cash flows cumulatively for the current financial year to date, with a comparative statement for the
comparable year-to-date period of the immediately preceding financial year.
IAS 34:22 Note: Appendix A to IAS 34 illustrates the periods required to be presented by an entity that reports half-yearly and
an entity that reports quarterly.
IAS 34:21 Entities whose business is highly seasonal are encouraged (but not required) to report financial information for the
twelve months up to the end of the interim period, and comparative information for the prior twelve-month period.

IAS 34:21 Note: If such information is reported, on the basis that it may be useful to users of the interim financial report, it is in
addition to the information required in paragraph 20 of IAS 34 (see above).
Materiality
IAS 34:23 In deciding how to recognise, measure, classify, or disclose an item for interim financial reporting purposes, materiality
shall be assessed in relation to the interim period financial data.
Notes:
IAS 34:23 1) In making assessments of materiality, it should be recognised that interim measurements may rely on estimates to a
greater extent than measurements of annual financial data.
IAS 34:24 2) IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and
Errors define an item as material if its omission or misstatement could influence the economic decisions of users of
the financial statements. IAS 1 requires separate disclosure of material items, including (for example) discontinued
operations, and IAS 8 requires disclosure of changes in accounting estimates, errors and changes in accounting
policies. Neither Standard contains quantified guidance as to materiality.
IAS 34:25 3) While judgement is always required in assessing materiality, IAS 34 bases the recognition and disclosure decision
on data for the interim period by itself for reasons of understandability of the interim figures. Thus, for example,
unusual items, changes in accounting policies or estimates, and errors are recognised and disclosed on the basis of
materiality in relation to interim period data to avoid misleading inferences that might result from non-disclosure.
The overriding goal is to ensure that an interim financial report includes all information that is relevant to
understanding an entity’s financial position and performance during the interim period.
Disclosure in annual financial statements
IAS 34:26 If an estimate of an amount reported in an interim period is changed significantly during the final interim period of the
financial year, but a separate financial report is not published for that final interim period, the nature and amount of that
change in estimate shall be disclosed in a note to the annual financial statements for that financial year.
IAS 34:27 Note: IAS 8 requires disclosure of the nature and (if practicable) the amount of a change in estimate that either has a
material effect in the current period or is expected to have a material effect in subsequent periods. Paragraph
16(d) of IAS 34 requires similar disclosure in an interim financial report. Examples include changes in estimate
in the final interim period relating to inventory write-downs, restructurings, or impairment losses that were
reported in an earlier interim period of the financial year. The disclosure required by paragraph 26 of IAS 34 is
consistent with the IAS 8 requirement and is intended to be narrow in scope – relating only to the change in
estimate. An entity is not required to include additional interim period financial information in its annual
Recognition and measurement
IAS 34:40 Note: Appendix B to IAS 34 provides examples of applying the general recognition and measurement principles set
out in paragraphs 28 to 39 of IAS 34.
Same accounting policies as annual financial statements
IAS 34:28 An entity shall apply the same accounting policies in its interim financial statements as are applied in its annual financial
statements, except for accounting policy changes made after the date of the most recent annual financial statements
that are to be reflected in the next annual financial statements.
IAS 34:28 However, the frequency of an entity's reporting (annual, half-yearly, or quarterly) shall not affect the measurement of its
annual results. To achieve that objective, measurements for interim reporting purposes shall be made on a year-to-date
basis.
Note: Paragraphs 29 to 36 of IAS 34 provide more guidance on the application of the principles set out in
paragraph 28 (see above).
146

Revenues received seasonally, cyclically, or occasionally
IAS 34:37 Revenues that are received seasonally, cyclically, or occasionally within a financial year shall not be anticipated or
deferred as of an interim date if anticipation or deferral would not be appropriate at the end of the entity’s financial
year.
IAS 34:38 Note: Examples include dividend revenue, royalties, and government grants. Additionally, some entities consistently
earn more revenues in certain interim periods of a financial year than in other interim periods, for example,
seasonal revenues of retailers. Such revenues are recognised when they occur.
Costs incurred unevenly during the financial year
IAS 34:39 Costs that are incurred unevenly during an entity's financial year shall be anticipated or deferred for interim reporting
purposes if, and only if, it is also appropriate to anticipate or defer that type of cost at the end of the financial year.
Use of estimates
IAS 34:41 The measurement procedures to be followed in an interim financial report shall be designed to ensure that the resulting
information is reliable and that all material financial information that is relevant to an understanding of the financial
position or performance of the entity is appropriately disclosed.
Notes:
IAS 34:41 1) While measurements in both annual and interim financial reports are often based on reasonable estimates, the
preparation of interim financial reports generally will require a greater use of estimation methods than annual
financial reports.
IAS 34:42 2) Appendix C to IAS 34 provides examples of the use of estimates in interim periods.
Restatement of previously reported interim periods
A change in accounting policy (other than one for which the transition is specified by a new IFRS) shall be reflected by:
IAS 34:43(a) a) restating the financial statements of prior interim periods of the current financial year and the comparable interim
periods of any prior financial years that will be restated in the annual financial statements in accordance with IAS 8;
or
IAS 34:43(b) b) when it is impracticable to determine the cumulative effect at the beginning of the financial year of applying a new
accounting policy to all prior periods, adjusting the financial statements of prior interim periods of the current
financial year and comparable interim periods of prior financial years to apply the new accounting policy
prospectively from the earliest date practicable.
IAS 34:44 Note: One objective of the principle in paragraph 43 of IAS 34 is to ensure that a single accounting policy is applied
to a particular class of transactions throughout an entire financial year. Under IAS 8, a change in accounting
policy is reflected by retrospective application, with restatement of prior period financial data as far back as is
practicable. However, if the cumulative amount of the adjustment relating to prior financial years is
impracticable to determine, then under IAS 8 the new policy is applied prospectively from the earliest date
practicable. The effect of the principle in paragraph 43 of IAS 34 (see above) is to require that within the current
financial year any change in accounting policy is applied either retrospectively or, if that is not practicable,
prospectively, from no later than the beginning of the financial year.
Restatement of previously reported segment information
IFRS 8:29 If an entity changes the structure of its internal organisation in a manner that causes the composition of its reportable
segments to change, the corresponding information for earlier interim periods shall be restated, unless the information is
not available and the cost to develop it would be excessive.
IFRS 8:29 Note: The determination of whether the information is not available and the cost to develop it would be excessive
shall be made for each individual item of disclosure.
IFRS 8:29 Following a change in the composition of its reportable segments, an entity shall disclose whether it has restated the
corresponding items of segment information for earlier interim periods.

IFRS 8:30 If an entity has changed the structure of its internal organisation in a manner that causes the composition of its
reportable segments to change and if segment information for earlier interim periods is not restated to reflect the
change, the entity shall disclose in the year in which the change occurs segment information for the current period on
both the old basis and the new basis of segmentation.
IFRS 8:30 Note: The disclosures set out in paragraph 30 of IFRS 8 (see above) are not required where the necessary information
is not available and the cost to develop it would be excessive.
IAS 34:49 If the entity has applied paragraphs 15A-15C and 16A and the amended paragraph 15 (and the deletion of paragraphs
16-18) arising from Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010 before 1 January 2011 it shall disclose that fact.
148

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 36. The objective of this
Standard is to ensure that assets are not carried at an amount that is greater than their recoverable amount. If an asset
is carried at more than its recoverable amount, the asset is described as impaired and IAS 36 requires the entity to
recognise an impairment loss.
The principal issues are: how to determine whether impairment exists, how to recognise an impairment loss and when
an entity should reverse an impairment loss.
None
General disclosures
An entity shall disclose, for each class of assets:
IAS 36:126(a) a) the amount of impairment losses recognised in profit or loss during the period and the line item(s) of the statement
of comprehensive income in which those impairment losses are included;
IAS 36:126(b) b) the amount of reversals of impairment losses recognised in profit or loss during the period and the line item(s) of the
statement of comprehensive income in which those impairment losses are reversed;
IAS 36:126(c) c) the amount of impairment losses on revalued assets recognised in other comprehensive income during the period;
and
IAS 36:126(d) d) the amount of reversals of impairment losses on revalued assets recognised in other comprehensive income during
the period.
Notes:
IAS 36:128 1) A class of assets is a grouping of assets of similar nature and use in an entity’s operations.
IAS 36:128 2) The information required by paragraph 126 of IAS 36 (see above) may be presented with other information
disclosed for the class of assets. For example, this information may be included in a reconciliation of the carrying
amount of property, plant and equipment, at the beginning and end of the period, as required under
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment.
Entities reporting segment information
An entity that reports segment information in accordance with IFRS 8 Operating Segments shall disclose the following
for each reportable segment:
IAS 36:129(a) a) the amount of impairment losses recognised in profit or loss and in other comprehensive income during the period;
and
IAS 36:129(b) b) the amount of reversals of impairment losses recognised in profit or loss and in other comprehensive income during
the period.
Impairment losses or reversals that are individually material
An entity shall disclose the following for each material impairment loss recognised or reversed during the period for an
individual asset, including goodwill, or a cash-generating unit:
IAS 36:130(a) a) the events and circumstances that led to the recognition or reversal of the impairment loss;
IAS 36:130(b) b) the amount of the impairment loss recognised or reversed;
149
IAS 36 Impairment of Assets

IAS 36:130(c) c) for an individual asset:
i) the nature of the asset; and
ii) if the entity reports segment information under IFRS 8, the reportable segment to which the asset belongs;
IAS 36:130(d) d) for a cash-generating unit:
i) a description of the cash-generating unit (such as whether it is a product line, a plant, a business operation, a
geographical area, or a reportable segment as defined in IFRS 8);
ii) the amount of the impairment loss recognised or reversed by class of assets and, if the entity reports segment
information in accordance with IFRS 8, by reportable segment; and
iii) if the aggregation of assets for identifying the cash-generating unit has changed since the previous estimate of
the cash-generating unit's recoverable amount (if any), a description of the current and former ways of
aggregating assets and the reasons for changing the way the cash-generating unit is identified;
IAS 36:130(e) e) whether the recoverable amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is its fair value less cost to sell or its value in use;
IAS 36:130(f) f) if recoverable amount is fair value less cost to sell, the basis used to determine fair value less cost to sell (such as
whether fair value was determined by reference to an active market); and
IAS 36:130(g) g) if recoverable amount is value in use, the discount rate(s) used in the current estimate and previous estimate (if any)
of value in use.
Impairment losses or reversals that are not individually material
An entity shall disclose the following information for the aggregate impairment losses and the aggregate reversals of
impairment losses recognised during the period for which no information is disclosed in accordance with paragraph 130
of IAS 36 (see above):
IAS 36:131(a) a) the main classes of assets affected by impairment losses and the main classes of assets affected by reversals of
impairment losses; and
IAS 36:131(b) b) the main events and circumstances that led to the recognition of these impairment losses and reversals of
impairment losses.
Key assumptions used to determine recoverable amount
IAS 36:132 An entity is encouraged to disclose key assumptions used to determine the recoverable amount of assets (cash-
generating units) during the period.
IAS 36:132 Note: This disclosure is encouraged for (cash-generating units containing) assets other than goodwill and intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives. Paragraph 134 of IAS 36 (see below) requires an entity to disclose information
about the estimates used to measure the recoverable amount of a cash-generating unit when goodwill or an
intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is included in the carrying amount of that unit.
Goodwill not yet allocated to a cash-generating unit
IAS 36:133 If, in accordance with paragraph 84 of IAS 36, any portion of the goodwill acquired in a business combination during
the period has not been allocated to a cash-generating unit (group of units) at the end of the reporting period, the
amount of the unallocated goodwill shall be disclosed, together with the reasons why that amount remains unallocated.
Estimates used to measure recoverable amounts of cash-generating units containing goodwill or intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives
An entity shall disclose the information required by (a)-(f) below for each cash-generating unit (group of units) for which
the carrying amount of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives allocated to that unit (group of units) is
significant in comparison with the entity’s total carrying amount of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful
lives:
IAS 36:134(a) a) the carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the unit (group of units);
IAS 36:134(b) b) the carrying amount of intangible assets with indefinite useful lives allocated to the unit (group of units);
IAS 36:134(c) c) the basis on which the unit’s (group of units’) recoverable amount has been determined (i.e. value in use or fair
value less costs to sell);
150

IAS 36:134(d) d) if the unit’s (group of units’) recoverable amount is based on value in use:
i) a description of each key assumption on which management has based its cash flow projections for the period
covered by the most recent budgets/forecasts;
Note: Key assumptions are those to which the unit’s (group of units’) recoverable amount is most sensitive.
ii) a description of management’s approach to determining the value(s) assigned to each key assumption, whether
those value(s) reflect past experience or, if appropriate, are consistent with external sources of information, and,
if not, how and why they differ from past experience or external sources of information;
iii) the period over which management has projected cash flows based on financial budgets/forecasts approved by
management and, when a period greater than five years is used for a cash-generating unit (group of units), an
explanation of why that longer period is justified;
iv) the growth rate used to extrapolate cash flow projections beyond the period covered by the most recent
budgets/forecasts, and the justification for using any growth rate that exceeds the long-term average growth
rate for the products, industries, or country or countries in which the entity operates, or for the market to which
the unit (group of units) is dedicated; and
v) the discount rate(s) applied to the cash flow projections;
IAS 36:134(e) e) if the unit’s (group of units’) recoverable amount is based on fair value less costs to sell, the methodology used to
determine fair value less costs to sell;
IAS 36:134(e) f) if fair value less costs to sell is not determined using an observable market price for the unit (group of units), the
following information shall also be disclosed:
i) a description of each key assumption on which management has based its determination of fair value less costs
to sell; and
IAS 36:134(e) Note: Key assumptions are those to which the unit’s (group of units’) recoverable amount is most sensitive.
ii) a description of management’s approach to determining the value (or values) assigned to each key assumption,
whether those values reflect past experience or, if appropriate, are consistent with external sources of
information, and, if not, how and why they differ from past experience or external sources of information; and
IAS 36:134(e) If fair value less costs to sell is determined using discounted cash flow projections, the following information
shall also be disclosed:
iii) the period over which management has projected cash flows.
iv) the growth rate used to extrapolate cash flow projections.
v) the discount rate(s) applied to the cash flow projections.
IAS 36:134(f) g) if a reasonably possible change in a key assumption on which management has based its determination of the unit’s
(group of units’) recoverable amount would cause the unit’s (group of units’) carrying amount to exceed its
recoverable amount:
i) the amount by which the unit’s (group of units’) recoverable amount exceeds its carrying amount;
ii) the value assigned to the key assumption; and
iii) the amount by which the value assigned to the key assumption must change, after incorporating any
consequential effects of that change on the other variables used to measure recoverable amount, in order for
the unit’s (group of units’) recoverable amount to be equal to its carrying amount.
IAS 36:135 If some or all of the carrying amount of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives is allocated across
multiple cash-generating units (groups of units), and the amount so allocated to each unit (group of units) is not
significant in comparison with the entity’s total carrying amount of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful
lives, the following shall be disclosed:
a) that fact; and
b) the aggregate carrying amount of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives allocated to those units
(groups of units).

IAS 36:135 In addition to the requirement above (paragraph 135 of IAS 36), if the recoverable amounts of any of the cash-
generating units (groups of units) are based on the same key assumption(s) and the aggregate carrying amount of
goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives allocated to them is significant in comparison with the entity’s
total carrying amount of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, an entity shall disclose:
IAS 36:135 a) that fact;
IAS 36:135(a) b) the aggregate carrying amount of goodwill allocated to those units (groups of units);
IAS 36:135(b) c) the aggregate carrying amount of intangible assets with indefinite useful lives allocated to those units (groups of
units);
IAS 36:135(c) d) a description of the key assumption(s);
IAS 36:135(d) e) a description of management’s approach to determining the value(s) assigned to the key assumption(s), whether
those value(s) reflect past experience or, if appropriate, are consistent with external sources of information, and, if
not, how and why they differ from past experience or external sources of information; and
IAS 36:135(e) f) if a reasonably possible change in the key assumption(s) would cause the aggregate of the units’ (groups of units’)
carrying amounts to exceed the aggregate of their recoverable amounts:
i) the amount by which the aggregate of the units’ (groups of units’) recoverable amounts exceeds the aggregate
of their carrying amounts;
ii) the value(s) assigned to the key assumption(s); and
iii) the amount by which the value(s) assigned to the key assumption(s) must change, after incorporating any
consequential effects of the change on the other variables used to measure recoverable amount, in order for the
aggregate of the units’ (groups of units’) recoverable amounts to be equal to the aggregate of their carrying
amounts.
Notes:
IAS 36:136 1) The most recent detailed calculation made in a preceding period of the recoverable amount of a cash-generating
unit (group of units) may, in accordance with paragraph 24 or paragraph 99 of IAS 36, be carried forward and
used in the impairment test for that unit (group of units) in the current period provided specified criteria are met.
When this is the case, the information for that unit (group of units) that is incorporated into the disclosures required
by paragraphs 134 and 135 of IAS 36 relate to the carried forward calculation of the recoverable amount.
IAS 36:137 2) Illustrative Example 9 accompanying the Standard illustrates the disclosures required by paragraphs 134 and 135
of IAS 36.
152

accounting for provisions (including provisions for restructuring and onerous contracts), contingent liabilities and
contingent assets.
None
None
Reimbursements
IAS 37:53 Where some or all of the expenditure required to settle a provision is expected to be reimbursed by another party, and
that reimbursement is recognised in the statement of financial position, it shall be treated as a separate asset.
IAS 37:53 Note: The reimbursement shall be recognised when, and only when, it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be
received if the entity settles the obligation. The amount recognised for the reimbursement shall not exceed the
amount of the provision.
IAS 37:54 In the statement of comprehensive income, the expense relating to a provision may be presented net of the amount
recognised for a reimbursement.
IAS 37:54 Note: A net presentation as described is permitted, but not required.
Provisions
For each class of provision, an entity shall disclose:
IAS 37:84(a) a) the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period;
IAS 37:84(b) b) additional provisions made in the period, including increases to existing provisions;
IAS 37:84(c) c) amounts used (i.e. incurred and charged against the provision) during the period;
IAS 37:84(d) d) unused amounts reversed during the period; and
IAS 37:84(e) e) the increase during the period in the discounted amount arising from the passage of time and the effect of any
change in the discount rate.
Notes:
IAS 37:84 1) Comparative information is not required for the reconciliation prescribed in paragraph 84 of IAS 37.
IAS 37:87 2) In determining which provisions or contingent liabilities may be aggregated to form a class, it is necessary to
consider whether the nature of the items is sufficiently similar for a single statement about them to fulfil the
requirements of paragraphs 85(a) and (b) and 86(a) and (b) of IAS 37 (see below). Thus, it may be appropriate to
treat as a single class of provision amounts relating to warranties of different products, but it would not be
appropriate to treat as a single class amounts relating to normal warranties and amounts that are subject to legal
proceedings.
An entity shall disclose the following for each class of provision:
IAS 37:85(a) a) a brief description of the nature of the obligation and the expected timing of any resulting outflows of economic
benefits;
IAS 37:85(b) b) an indication of the uncertainties about the amount or timing of those outflows;
IAS 37:85(b) c) where necessary to provide adequate information, the major assumptions made concerning future events, as
addressed in paragraph 48 of IAS 37; and
153
IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets

IAS 37:85(c) d) the amount of any expected reimbursement, stating the amount of any asset that has been recognised for that
expected reimbursement.
Notes:
IAS 37:9 1) Where a restructuring meets the definition of a discontinued operation, additional disclosures may be required by
IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.
IAS 37:26 2) In the extremely rare case where no reliable estimate of an obligation can be made, and therefore a liability exists
that cannot be recognised, that liability is disclosed as a contingent liability (see paragraph 86 of IAS 37).
IAS 37:75 3) If an entity has started to implement a restructuring plan, or announced its main features to those affected, only
after the reporting period, disclosure is required under IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period, if the restructuring
is material and non-disclosure could influence the economic decisions that users make on the basis of the financial
statements.
Contingent liabilities
Unless the possibility of any outflow in settlement is remote, an entity shall disclose for each class of contingent liability
at the end of the reporting period:
IAS 37:86 a) a brief description of the nature of the contingent liability;
IAS 37:86(a) b) an estimate of its financial effect, measured under paragraphs 36 to 52 of IAS 37 (where practicable);
IAS 37:86(b) c) an indication of the uncertainties relating to the amount or timing of any outflow (where practicable); and
IAS 37:86(c) d) the possibility of any reimbursement (where practicable).
IAS 37:88 Where a provision and a contingent liability arise from the same set of circumstances, an entity makes the disclosures
required by paragraphs 84 to 86 of IAS 37 in a way that shows the link between the provision and the contingent
liability.
Contingent assets
IAS 37:89 Where an inflow of economic benefits is probable, an entity shall disclose:
a) a brief description of the nature of the contingent assets at the end of the reporting period; and
b) where practicable, an estimate of their financial effect, measured using the principles set out for provisions in
paragraphs 36 to 52 of IAS 37.
IAS 37:90 It is important that disclosures for contingent assets avoid giving misleading indications of the likelihood of income
arising.
Explanation of information not disclosed
IAS 37:91 Where any of the information required by paragraphs 86 and 89 of IAS 37 (see above) is not disclosed because it is not
practicable to do so, that fact shall be stated.
IAS 37:92 In the extremely rare cases where disclosure of some or all of the information required by paragraphs 84 to 89 of IAS 37
(see above) can be expected to prejudice seriously the position of the entity in a dispute with other parties on the subject
matter of the provision, contingent liability or contingent asset, an entity need not disclose the information, but instead
shall disclose the general nature of the dispute, together with the fact that, and reason why, the information has not
been disclosed.
154

accounting treatment for intangible assets that are not specifically dealt with in another Standard. The principal issues
are when an intangible asset may be recognised, as well as the determination of the subsequent carrying amount.
The Standard prescribes certain criteria that should be met before an intangible asset may be recognised.
None
None
Disclosures – general
An entity shall disclose the following for each class of intangible assets, distinguishing between internally generated
intangible assets and other intangible assets:
IAS 38:118(a) a) whether the useful lives are indefinite or finite;
IAS 38:118(a) b) the useful lives or the amortisation rates used for intangible assets with finite useful lives;
IAS 38:118(b) c) the amortisation methods used for intangible assets with finite useful lives;
IAS 38:118(c) d) the gross carrying amount and any accumulated amortisation (aggregated with accumulated impairment losses) at
IAS 38:118(d) e) the line item(s) of the statement of comprehensive income in which any amortisation of intangible assets is included; and
IAS 38:118(e) f) a reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period showing:
i) additions, indicating separately; those from internal development, those acquired separately, and those acquired
through business combinations;
ii) assets classified as held for sale or included in a disposal group classified as held for sale in accordance with
IFRS 5 and other disposals;
iii) increases or decreases during the period resulting from revaluations under paragraphs 75, 85 and 86 of IAS 38 and
from impairment losses recognised or reversed in other comprehensive income in accordance with IAS 36 (if any);
iv) impairment losses recognised in profit or loss during the period in accordance with IAS 36 (if any);
v) impairment losses reversed in profit or loss during the period in accordance with IAS 36 (if any);
vi) any amortisation recognised during the period;
vii) net exchange differences arising on the translation of the financial statements into the presentation currency
and on the translation of a foreign operation into the presentation currency of the entity; and
viii) other changes in the carrying amount during the period.
IAS 38:119 The classes of intangible assets are disaggregated (aggregated) into smaller (larger) classes if this results in more relevant
information for the users of the financial statements.
Note: A class of intangible assets is defined as a grouping of assets of a similar nature and use in an entity’s
operations. Examples of separate classes may include:
IAS 38:119(a) • brand names;
IAS 38:119(b) • mastheads and publishing titles;
IAS 38:119(c) • computer software;
IAS 38:119(d) • licences and franchises;
IAS 38:119(e) • copyrights, patents and other industrial property rights, service and operating rights;
IAS 38:119(f) • recipes, formulae, models, designs and prototypes; and
IAS 38:119(g) • intangible assets under development.
155
IAS 38 Intangible Assets

IAS 38:120 An entity discloses information on impaired intangible assets in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets in addition
to the information required by paragraphs 118(e)(iii) to (v) of IAS 38 (see above).
IAS 38:121 An entity discloses the nature and amount of any change in an accounting estimate relating to intangible assets that
has a material effect in the current period or that is expected to have a material effect in subsequent periods, under
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.
Note: Such disclosure may arise from changes in:
IAS 38:121(a) • the assessment of an intangible asset’s useful life;
IAS 38:121(b) • the amortisation method; or
IAS 38:121(c) • residual values.
An entity shall also disclose:
IAS 38:122(a) a) for an intangible asset assessed as having an indefinite useful life, the carrying amount of that asset;
IAS 38:122(a) b) for an intangible asset assessed as having an indefinite useful life:
i) the reasons supporting the assessment of an indefinite useful life; and
ii) a description of the factor(s) that played a significant role in determining that the asset has an indefinite useful
life.
IAS 38:123 Note: When an entity describes the factor(s) that played a significant role in determining whether the useful life of
an intangible asset is indefinite or finite, the entity considers the list of factors in paragraph 90 of IAS 38.
IAS 38:122(b) c) a description, the carrying amount and remaining amortisation period of any individual intangible asset that is
material to the financial statements of the entity;
IAS 38:122(c) d) for intangible assets acquired by way of a government grant and initially recognised at fair value (see paragraph 44
of IAS 38):
i) the fair value initially recognised for these assets;
ii) their carrying amount; and
iii) whether they are measured after recognition under the cost model or the revaluation model;
IAS 38:122(d) e) the existence and carrying amounts of intangible assets whose title is restricted and the carrying amounts of
intangible assets pledged as security for liabilities; and
IAS 38:122(e) f) the amount of contractual commitments for the acquisition of intangible assets.
Intangible assets measured after recognition using the revaluation model
If intangible assets are accounted for at revalued amounts, an entity shall disclose the following:
IAS 38:124(a) a) by class of intangible assets:
i) the effective date of the revaluation;
ii) the carrying amount of revalued intangible assets; and
iii) the carrying amount that would have been recognised had the revalued class of intangible assets been
measured after recognition using the cost model as described in paragraph 74 of IAS 38;
IAS 38:124(b) b) in respect of the revaluation surplus relating to intangible assets:
i) the amount of the surplus at the beginning and end of the period;
ii) the changes during the period; and
iii) any restrictions on the distribution of the balance to shareholders; and
IAS 38:124(c) c) the methods and significant assumptions applied in estimating the assets’ fair values.
156

IAS 38:125 It may be necessary to aggregate the classes of revalued assets into larger classes for disclosure purposes.
IAS 38:125 Note: Classes are not aggregated if this would result in the combination of a class of intangible assets that includes
amounts measured under both the cost and revaluation models.
Research and development expenditure
IAS 38:126 An entity shall disclose the aggregate amount of research and development expenditure recognised as an expense
during the period.
IAS 38:127 Note: Research and development expenditure comprises all expenditure that is directly attributable to research or
development activities (see paragraphs 66 and 67 of IAS 38 for guidance on the type of expenditure to be
included for the purpose of the disclosure requirement in paragraph 126 of IAS 38).
Additional encouraged disclosures
An entity is encouraged, but not required, to disclose the following information:
IAS 38:128(a) a) a description of any fully amortised intangible asset that is still in use; and
IAS 38:128(b) b) a brief description of significant intangible assets controlled by the entity but not recognised as assets because
they did not meet the recognition criteria of IAS 38 or because they were acquired or generated before IAS 38
(1998 version) was effective.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IAS 39, which establishes
principles for recognising, derecognising and measuring financial assets (until the application of IFRS 9 (see below))
and financial liabilities and some contracts to buy and sell non-financial items. IAS 39 does not generally deal with
presentation and disclosure – IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures and IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation
are the standards providing guidance in these areas (see relevant sections of this checklist). However, the points set out
in this section continue to be dealt with in IAS 39 and should be considered in relevant circumstances.
None
• IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (issued November 2009) amends IAS 39. IFRS 9 provided guidance on the accounting
for financial assets and replaces the guidance on the accounting for financial assets in IAS 39. The amendments are
applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, with earlier application permitted; and
• Improvements to IFRSs (issued in May 2010) amends IAS 39 (although no amendments to disclosure requirements
within IAS 39). Those amendments are applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2010 with earlier
Classification of financial assets
IAS 39:45 The entity may use descriptors or categorisations for its financial assets other than those defined in paragraph 9 of
IAS 39 when presenting information in the financial statements.
Note: For the purpose of measuring a financial asset after initial recognition, paragraph 9 of IAS 39 classifies financial
assets into the following four categories:
• financial assets at fair value through profit or loss;
• held-to-maturity investments;
• loans and receivables; and
• available-for-sale financial assets.
These categories apply to measurement and profit or loss recognition under IAS 39 but do not necessarily place
a restriction on descriptors or categorisations for financial instruments and other contracts in the scope of
IAS 39. The entity shall disclose in the notes the information required by IFRS 7.
Note: Paragraph 45 of IAS 39 was deleted as a consequential amendment to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments issued in
November 2009, because the classification of financial assets is no longer within the scope of IAS 39 when
IFRS 9 is applied. The entity shall apply the amendment to paragraph 45 of IAS 39, when it applies IFRS 9.
Fair value hedges
IAS 39:89A For a fair value hedge of the interest rate exposure of a portion of a portfolio of financial assets or financial liabilities
(and only in such a hedge), the requirement in paragraph 89(b) of IAS 39 may be met by presenting the gain or loss
attributable to the hedged item either:
a) in a single separate line item within assets, for those repricing time periods for which the hedged item is an asset; or
b) in a single separate line item within liabilities, for those repricing time periods for which the hedged item is a liability.
IAS 39:89A The separate line items referred to in paragraphs 89A(a) and 89A(b) of IAS 39 (see above) shall be presented next to
financial assets or financial liabilities. Amounts included in these line items shall be removed from the statement of
financial position when the assets or liabilities to which they relate are derecognised.
158
IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement

Notes:
IAS 39:89(b) 1) The gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk shall adjust the carrying amount of the hedged
item and be recognised in profit or loss. This applies if the hedged item is otherwise measured at cost. Recognition
of the gain or loss attributable to the hedged risk in profit or loss applies if the hedged item is an available-for-sale
financial asset.
IAS 39:89(b) 1) The gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk shall adjust the carrying amount of the hedged
item and be recognised in profit or loss. This applies if the hedged item is otherwise measured at cost.
Note: Paragraph 89(b) of IAS 39 was amended as a consequential amendment to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments issued
in November 2009. The entity shall apply the amendment to paragraph 89(b) of IAS 39, when it applies IFRS 9.

accounting treatment for the recognition and measurement of investment property and the related disclosure
requirements. The Standard allows entities to choose between a fair value model and a cost model for the
measurement of investment property, except in the case of investment property held under an operating lease, when
the fair value model is required to be applied. One of the key issues is the determination of whether a property meets
the definition of an investment property, or is excluded from the scope of this Standard and is instead covered by
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment, or IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.
Where investment property is held under leases, the disclosure requirements in this section apply in addition to those of
IAS 17 Leases (see relevant section of this checklist). In accordance with IAS 17, the owner of an investment property
provides lessors’ disclosures about leases into which it has entered. An entity that holds an investment property under a
finance or operating lease provides lessees’ disclosures for finance leases and lessors’ disclosures for any operating
leases into which it has entered.
None
None
General disclosure requirements
IAS 40:75(a) a) whether it applies the fair value model or the cost model;
IAS 40:75(b) b) if it applies the fair value model, whether, and in what circumstances, property interests held under operating leases
are classified and accounted for as investment property;
IAS 40:75(c) c) when classification is difficult (see paragraph 14 of IAS 40), the criteria it uses to distinguish investment property
from owner-occupied property and from property held for sale in the ordinary course of business;
IAS 40:75(d) d) the methods and significant assumptions applied in determining the fair value of investment property, including a
statement whether the determination of fair value was supported by market evidence or was more heavily based on
other factors (which the entity shall disclose) because of the nature of the property and lack of comparable market
data;
IAS 40:75(e) e) the extent to which the fair value of investment property (as measured or disclosed in the financial statements) is
based on a valuation by an independent valuer who holds a recognised and relevant professional qualification and
has recent experience in the location and category of the investment property being valued;
IAS 40:75(e) f) if there has been no valuation by an appropriately qualified independent valuer, that fact;
IAS 40:75(f) g) the amounts recognised in profit or loss for:
i) rental income from investment property;
ii) direct operating expenses (including repairs and maintenance) arising from investment property that generated
rental income during the period;
iii) direct operating expenses (including repairs and maintenance) arising from investment property that did not
generate rental income during the period; and
iv) where the entity has selected a different model (cost or fair value) to account for its investment property backing
liabilities that pay a return linked directly to the fair value of, or the returns from, specified assets (including the
investment property), the cumulative change in fair value recognised in profit or loss on a sale of investment
property from a pool of assets in which the cost model is used into a pool in which the fair value model is used
(see paragraph 32C of IAS 40);
IAS 40:75(g) h) the existence and amounts of restrictions on the realisability of investment property or the remittance of income and
proceeds of disposal; and
IAS 40:75(h) i) contractual obligations to purchase, construct or develop investment property or for repairs, maintenance or
enhancements.
160
IAS 40 Investment Property

Fair value model
IAS 40:76 In addition to the disclosures required by paragraph 75 of IAS 40 (see above), an entity that applies the fair value model
(as described in paragraphs 33 to 55 of IAS 40) shall disclose a reconciliation between the carrying amounts of
investment property at the beginning and end of the period.
The reconciliation required by paragraph 76 of IAS 40 (see above) shall show the following:
IAS 40:76(a) a) additions, disclosing separately those additions resulting from acquisitions and those resulting from subsequent
expenditure recognised in the carrying amount of an asset;
IAS 40:76(b) b) additions resulting from acquisitions through business combinations;
IAS 40:76(c) c) assets classified as held for sale or included in a disposal group classified as held for sale in accordance with
IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations and other disposals;
IAS 40:76(d) d) net gains or losses from fair value adjustments;
IAS 40:76(e) e) the net exchange differences arising on the translation of the financial statements into a different presentation
currency, and on translation of a foreign operation into the presentation currency of the reporting entity;
IAS 40:76(f) f) transfers to and from inventories and owner-occupied property; and
IAS 40:76(g) g) other changes.
IAS 40:77 When a valuation obtained for investment property is adjusted significantly for the purpose of the financial statements
(e.g. to avoid double-counting of assets or liabilities that are recognised as separate assets and liabilities as described in
paragraph 50 of IAS 40), the entity shall disclose a reconciliation between the valuation obtained and the adjusted
valuation included in the financial statements, showing separately the aggregate amount of any recognised lease
obligations that have been added back, and any other significant adjustments.
IAS 40:78 In the exceptional cases when an entity measures investment property using the cost model in IAS 16 Property, Plant
and Equipment, because of the lack of a reliable fair value (see paragraph 53 of IAS 40), the reconciliation required by
paragraph 76 of IAS 40 (see above) shall disclose amounts relating to that investment property separately from amounts
relating to other investment property.
In the exceptional cases when an entity measures investment property using the cost model in IAS 16 because of the
lack of a reliable fair value (see paragraph 53 of IAS 40), an entity shall disclose:
IAS 40:78(a) a) a description of the investment property;
IAS 40:78(b) b) an explanation of why fair value cannot be reliably determined;
IAS 40:78(c) c) if possible, the range of estimates within which fair value is highly likely to lie; and
IAS 40:78(d) d) on disposal of investment property not carried at fair value:
i) the fact that the entity has disposed of investment property not carried at fair value;
ii) the carrying amount of that investment property at the time of sale; and
iii) the amount of gain or loss recognised.
Cost model
In addition to the disclosures required by paragraph 75 of IAS 40 (see above), an entity that applies the cost model in
paragraph 56 of IAS 40 shall also disclose:
IAS 40:79(a) a) the depreciation methods used;
IAS 40:79(b) b) the useful lives or the depreciation rates used;
IAS 40:79(c) c) the gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation (aggregated with accumulated impairment losses) at
IAS 40:79(d) d) a reconciliation of the carrying amount of investment property at the beginning and end of the period, showing the
following:
i) additions, disclosing separately those additions resulting from acquisitions and those resulting from subsequent
expenditure recognised as an asset;
ii) additions resulting from acquisitions through business combinations;

iii) assets classified as held for sale or included in a disposal group classified as held for sale in accordance with
IFRS 5 and other disposals;
iv) depreciation;
v) the amount of impairment losses recognised, and the amount of impairment losses reversed, during the period
in accordance with IAS 36;
vi) the net exchange differences arising on the translation of the financial statements into a different presentation
currency, and on translation of a foreign operation into the presentation currency of the reporting entity;
vii) transfers to and from inventories and owner-occupied property; and
viii) other changes; and
IAS 40:79(e) e) the fair value of investment property.
IAS 40:79(e) In the exceptional cases described in paragraph 53 of IAS 40, when an entity cannot determine the fair value of the
investment property reliably, it shall disclose:
a) a description of the investment property;
b) an explanation of why fair value cannot be determined reliably; and
c) if possible, the range of estimates within which fair value is highly likely to lie.
162

accounting treatment for agricultural activity. Agricultural activity is the management by an entity of the biological
transformation and harvest of living animals or plants (biological assets) for sale, or for conversion into agricultural
produce, or into additional biological assets. The primary issues are determining whether the Standard is applicable to
the activities undertaken by the entity, and the determination of fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce.
IAS 41 is applied to agricultural produce, which is the harvested product of the entity’s biological assets, only at the
point of harvest (e.g. fruit hanging on the fruit tree, ready to be picked – not packaged and ready for sale).
Once agricultural produce has been harvested, it is inventory and should be accounted for under IAS 2, Inventories.
Also, the subsequent processing of agricultural produce after harvest (e.g. grapes into wine) is not covered by IAS 41,
but by IAS 2.
None
None
General disclosure
IAS 41:40 An entity shall disclose the aggregate gain or loss arising during the current period on initial recognition of biological
assets and agricultural produce and from the change in fair value less estimated costs to sell of biological assets.
IAS 41:41 An entity shall provide a description of each group of biological assets.
IAS 41:42 Note: The disclosure required by paragraph 41 of IAS 41 (see above) may take the form of a narrative or quantified
description.
IAS 41:43 An entity is encouraged to provide a quantified description of each group of biological assets, distinguishing between
consumable and bearer biological assets or between mature and immature biological assets, as appropriate.
IAS 41:43 Note: For example, an entity may disclose the carrying amounts of consumable biological assets and bearer
biological assets by group. An entity may further divide those carrying amounts between mature and immature
assets. These distinctions provide information that may be helpful in assessing the timing of future cash flows.
IAS 41:43 An entity discloses the basis for making the distinctions between consumable and bearer biological assets, or between
mature and immature biological assets, as appropriate.
Notes:
IAS 41:44 1) Consumable biological assets are those that are to be harvested as agricultural produce or sold as biological
assets. Examples of consumable biological assets are livestock intended for the production of meat, livestock held
for sale, fish in farms, crops such as maize and wheat, and trees being grown for lumber. Bearer biological assets
are those other than consumable biological assets: for example, livestock from which milk is produced, grape vines,
fruit trees, and trees from which firewood is harvested while the tree remains. Bearer biological assets are not
agricultural produce but, rather, are self-regenerating.
IAS 41:45 2) Biological assets may be classified either as mature biological assets or immature biological assets. Mature
biological assets are those that have attained harvestable specifications (for consumable biological assets) or are
able to sustain regular harvests (for bearer biological assets).
If not disclosed elsewhere in information published with the financial statements, an entity shall describe:
IAS 41:46(a) a) the nature of its activities involving each group of biological assets; and
IAS 41:46(b) b) non-financial measures or estimates of the physical quantities of:
i) each group of the entity’s biological assets at the end of the period; and
ii) output of agricultural produce during the period.
163
IAS 41 Agriculture

IAS 41:47 An entity shall disclose the methods and significant assumptions applied in determining the fair value of each group of
agricultural produce at the point of harvest and each group of biological assets.
IAS 41:48 An entity shall disclose the fair value less estimated costs to sell of agricultural produce harvested during the period,
determined at the point of harvest.
IAS 41:49(a) a) the existence and carrying amounts of biological assets whose title is restricted, and the carrying amounts of
biological assets pledged as security for liabilities;
IAS 41:49(b) b) the amount of commitments for the development or acquisition of biological assets; and
IAS 41:49(c) c) financial risk management strategies related to agricultural activity.
IAS 41:50 An entity shall present a reconciliation of changes in the carrying amount of biological assets between the beginning
and the end of the current period.
The reconciliation required by paragraph 50 of IAS 41 (see above) shall include:
IAS 41:50(a) a) the gain or loss arising from changes in fair value less estimated costs to sell;
IAS 41:50(b) b) increases due to purchases;
IAS 41:50(c) c) decreases attributable to sales and biological assets classified as held for sale (or included in a disposal group that is
classified as held for sale) in accordance with IFRS 5;
IAS 41:50(d) d) decreases due to harvest;
IAS 41:50(e) e) increases resulting from business combinations;
IAS 41:50(f) f) net exchange differences arising on the translation of financial statements into a different presentation currency, and
on the translation of a foreign operation into the presentation currency of the reporting entity; and
IAS 41:50(g) g) other changes.
IAS 41:51 When there is a production cycle of more than one year, an entity is encouraged to disclose separately, by group or
otherwise, the amount of change in fair value less costs to sell of biological assets included in profit or loss due to
physical changes and due to price changes.
IAS 41:51 Note: The fair value less costs to sell of a biological asset can change due to both physical changes and price
changes in the market. Separate disclosure of physical and price changes is useful in appraising current period
performance and future prospects, particularly when there is a production cycle of more than one year.
This information is generally less useful when the production cycle is less than one year (e.g. when raising
chickens or growing cereal crops).
IAS 41:53 If an event occurs that gives rise to a material item of income or expense, the nature and amount of that item are
disclosed in accordance with IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements.
IAS 41:53 Note: Agricultural activity is often exposed to climatic, disease, and other natural risks. Examples include an outbreak
of a virulent disease, a flood, severe droughts or frosts, and a plague of insects.
Additional disclosures for biological assets where fair value cannot be measured reliably
If an entity measures biological assets at their cost less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment
losses (see paragraph 30 of IAS 41) at the end of the period, the entity shall disclose for such biological assets:
IAS 41:54(a) a) a description of the biological assets;
IAS 41:54(b) b) an explanation of why fair value cannot be measured reliably;
IAS 41:54(c) c) if possible, the range of estimates within which fair value is highly likely to lie;
IAS 41:54(d) d) the depreciation method used;
IAS 41:54(e) e) the useful lives or the depreciation rates used; and
IAS 41:54(f) f) the gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation (aggregated with accumulated impairment losses)
at the beginning and end of the period.
164

IAS 41:55 If, during the current period, an entity measures biological assets at their cost less any accumulated depreciation and any
accumulated impairment losses (see paragraph 30 of IAS 41):
a) an entity shall disclose any gain or loss recognised on disposal of such biological assets;
b) the reconciliation required by paragraph 50 of IAS 41 (see above) shall disclose amounts related to such biological
assets separately; and
c) the reconciliation required by paragraph 50 of IAS 41 (see above) shall include the following amounts included in
profit or loss related to those biological assets:
i) impairment losses;
ii) reversals of impairment losses; and
iii) depreciation.
IAS 41:56 If the fair value of biological assets previously measured at their cost less any accumulated depreciation and any
accumulated impairment losses becomes reliably measurable during the current period, an entity shall disclose for those
biological assets:
IAS 41:56(a) a) a description of the biological assets;
IAS 41:56(b) b) an explanation of why fair value has become reliably measurable; and
IAS 41:56(c) c) the effect of the change.
Government grants
An entity shall disclose the following related to agricultural activity covered by IAS 41:
IAS 41:57(a) a) the nature and extent of government grants recognised in the financial statements;
IAS 41:57(b) b) unfulfilled conditions and other contingencies attaching to government grants; and
IAS 41:57(c) c) significant decreases expected in the level of government grants.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRIC 1, which contains guidance
on accounting for changes in decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities that have previously been recognised
both as part of the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment under IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment, and
as a provision (liability) under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
None
None
Separate disclosure of movements in revaluation surplus (assets measured using the revaluation model
under IAS 16)
IFRIC 1:6(d) In complying with IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, which requires disclosure in the statement of
comprehensive income of each component of other comprehensive income or expense, any change in a revaluation
surplus arising from a change in the related decommissioning liability shall be separately identified and disclosed as such.
IFRIC 1:6(a) Note: For assets accounted for using the revaluation model under IAS 16, a change in the decommissioning liability
(which, under the cost model would be added to the carrying amount of the asset) increases or decreases the
revaluation surplus or deficit that has previously been recognised for the asset. Such movements are required to
be separately disclosed.
166
IFRIC 1 Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRIC 2, which interprets
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation. The Interpretation deals with the classification under IAS 32 of members’
interests in co-operatives and similar entities (members’ shares) that give the holder the right to request redemption for
cash or another financial asset.
IFRIC 2 applies to financial instruments within the scope of IAS 32, including financial instruments issued to members of
co-operative entities that evidence the members’ ownership interest in the entity. The Interpretation does not apply to
financial instruments that will or may be settled in the entity’s own equity instruments.
The Appendix to IFRIC 2 provides a number of examples illustrating the application of the Interpretation.
None
None
Presentation
IFRIC 2:5 The contractual right of the holder of a financial instrument (including members’ shares in co-operative entities) to
request redemption does not, in itself, require that financial instrument to be classified as a financial liability. Rather, the
entity must consider all of the terms and conditions of the financial instrument in determining its classification as a
financial liability or equity. Those terms and conditions include relevant local laws, regulations and the entity’s governing
charter in effect at the date of classification, but not expected future amendments to those laws, regulations or charter.
IFRIC 2:6 Members’ shares that would be classified as equity if the members did not have a right to request redemption are equity
if either of the conditions described in paragraphs 7 and 8 of IFRIC 2 (see below) is present or the members’ shares have
all the features and meet the condition in paragraphs 16A and 16B or paragraphs 16C and 16D of IAS 32. Demand
deposits, including current accounts, deposit accounts and similar contracts that arise when members act as customers
are financial liabilities of the entity.
IFRIC 2:7 Members’ shares are equity if the entity has an unconditional right to refuse redemption of the members’ shares.
IFRIC 2:8 Local law, regulation or the entity’s governing charter can impose various types of prohibitions on the redemption of
members’ shares, e.g. unconditional prohibitions or prohibitions based on liquidity criteria. If redemption is
unconditionally prohibited by local law, regulation or the entity’s governing charter, members’ shares are equity.
However, provisions in local law, regulation or the entity’s governing charter that prohibit redemption only if conditions
– such as liquidity constraints – are met (or are not met) do not result in members’ shares being equity.
IFRIC 2:9 Members’ shares in excess of the prohibition against redemption are liabilities, unless the entity has the unconditional
right to refuse redemption as described in paragraph 7 of IFRIC 2 (see above) or the members’ shares have all the
features and meet the conditions in paragraph 16A and 16B or paragraphs 16C or 16D of IAS 32.
Notes:
IFRIC 2:9 1) An unconditional prohibition may be absolute, in that all redemptions are prohibited. An unconditional prohibition
may be partial, in that it prohibits redemption of members’ shares if redemption would cause the number of
members’ shares or amount of paid-in capital from members’ shares to fall below a specified level.
IFRIC 2:9 2) In some cases, the number of shares or the amount of paid-in capital subject to a redemption prohibition may
change from time to time. Such a change in the redemption prohibition leads to a transfer between financial
liabilities and equity.
IFRIC 2:11 As required by paragraph 35 of IAS 32, distributions to holders of equity instruments are recognised directly in equity, net
of any income tax benefits. Interest, dividends and other returns relating to financial instruments classified as financial
liabilities are expenses, regardless of whether those amounts paid are legally characterised as dividends, interest or
otherwise.
Disclosure
IFRIC 2:13 When a change in the redemption prohibition leads to a transfer between financial liabilities and equity, the entity shall
disclose separately the amount, timing and reason for the transfer.
167
IFRIC 2 Members’ Shares in Co-operative Entities and Similar Instruments

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRIC 4, the object of which is to
provide guidance to assist in determining whether an arrangement is, or contains, a lease. Any arrangement that is
determined to involve a lease will fall within the scope of IAS 17 Leases, and will be subject to the presentation and
disclosure requirements of that Standard (see relevant section of this checklist).
None
None
Separating payments for the lease from other payments
IFRIC 4:15(b) If a purchaser concludes that it is impracticable to separate reliably payments for the lease (i.e. the right to use the asset)
from payments for other elements in the same arrangement (e.g. for services and the cost of inputs), in the case of an
operating lease:
a) all payments under the arrangement shall be treated as lease payments for the purposes of complying with the
disclosure requirements of IAS 17;
b) those payments shall be disclosed separately from minimum lease payments of other arrangements that do not
include payments for non-lease payments; and
c) the fact that the disclosed payments also include payments for non-lease elements in the arrangement shall be
stated.
IFRIC 4:13 Note: IFRIC 4 requires payments and other consideration to be separated at the inception of the arrangement or
upon a reassessment of the arrangement into those for the lease and those for other elements of the
arrangement, on the basis of their relative fair values, unless it is impracticable to separate the payments
reliably. The minimum lease payments as defined in paragraph 4 of IAS 17 Leases include only payments for
the lease.
168
IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease

IFRIC 5 Rights to Interests arising from Decommissioning, Restoration and Environmental
Rehabilitation Funds
This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRIC 5, which deals with the
accounting, in the financial statements of the contributor, for interests in decommissioning, restoration and
environmental rehabilitation funds established to fund some or all of the costs of decommissioning assets or to
undertake environmental rehabilitation.
None
None
IFRIC 5:11 A contributor shall disclose the nature of its interest in a fund and any restrictions on access to the assets in the fund.
IFRIC 5:12 When a contributor has an obligation to make potential additional contributions that is not recognised as a liability
(see paragraph 10 of IFRIC 5), it shall make the disclosures required by paragraph 86 of IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets (contingent liabilities – see relevant section of this checklist).
IFRIC 5:13 When a contributor accounts for its interest in the fund in accordance with paragraph 9 of IFRIC 5, it shall make the
disclosures required by paragraph 85(c) of IAS 37 (reimbursements – see relevant section of this checklist).
IFRIC 5:9 Note: In the absence of control, joint control or significant influence, paragraph 9 of IFRIC 5 requires that the
contributor’s right to reimbursement from the fund is accounted for in accordance with the rules for
reimbursements set out in IAS 37.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRIC 13, which deals with the
accounting for customer loyalty programmes.
None
At 30 September 2010 the following new Standard (issued but not yet effective) adds new paragraphs to IFRIC 13 or
amends existing paragraphs in IFRIC 13:
• Improvements to IFRSs (issued May 2010) amended IFRIC 13. The amendments are applicable for annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2011, with earlier application permitted.
IFRIC 13:10A Paragraph AG2 of IFRIC 13 was amended by Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010. An entity shall apply that
amendment for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies
the amendment for an earlier period it shall disclose that fact.
Note: The improvement clarifies that the “fair value” of award credits should take into account i) the amount of
discounts or incentives that would otherwise be offered to customers who have not earned award credits from
an initial sale, and ii) any expected forfeitures.
170
IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes

IFRIC 14 IAS 19 – The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements
and their Interaction
This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRIC 14, which applies to post-
employment defined benefits and other long-term employee defined benefits and provides guidance on:
a) when refunds or reductions in future contributions should be regarded as available in accordance with paragraph
58 of IAS 19 Employee Benefits;
b) how a minimum funding requirement might affect the availability of reductions in future contributions; and
c) when a minimum funding requirement might give rise to a liability.
None
At 30 September 2010 the following revised Interpretation (issued but not yet effective) adds new paragraphs to
IFRIC14 or amends existing paragraphs in IFRIC 14:
• Prepayments of a Minimum Funding Requirement (Amendments to IFRIC 14) (issued November 2009) amended
IFRIC 14 to remove an unintended consequence arising from the treatment of prepayments of future contributions
in some circumstances when there is a minimum funding requirement. The amendments are applicable for annual
IFRIC 14:10 In accordance with IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, the entity shall disclose information about the key sources
of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to
the carrying amount of the net asset or liability recognised in the statement of financial position.
Note: This might include disclosure of any restrictions on the current realisability of the surplus or disclosure of the
basis used to determine the amount of the economic benefit available.
IFRIC 14:27B Prepayments of a Minimum Funding Requirement (Amendments to IFRIC 14) added paragraph 3A and amended
paragraphs 16-18 and 20-22. An entity shall apply those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after
1 January 2011. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies the amendments for an earlier period, it shall disclose
that fact.

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRIC 15 which deals with the
accounting for revenue and associated expenses by entities that undertake the construction of real estate directly or
indirectly through subcontractors. The Interpretation considers the classification of such contracts (whether within the
scope of IAS 11 Construction Contracts or IAS 18 Revenue) and the recognition of revenue from the construction of
real estate.
None
None
IFRIC 15:20 When an entity recognises revenue using the percentage of completion method for agreements for the construction of real
estate that meet all the criteria in paragraph 14 of IAS 18 continuously as construction progresses (see paragraph 17 of
IFRIC 15), it shall disclose:
a) how it determines which agreements meet all the criteria in paragraph 14 of IAS 18 continuously as construction
progresses;
b) the amount of revenue arising from such agreements in the period; and
c) the methods used to determine the stage of completion of agreements in progress.
IFRIC 15:21 For the agreements described in paragraph 20 of IFRIC 15 (see above) that are in progress at the reporting date, the
entity shall also disclose:
a) the aggregate amount of costs incurred and recognised profits (less recognised losses) to date; and
b) the amount of advances received.
172
IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRIC 17 which provides
guidance on distribution of non-cash assets to owners.
None
None
IFRIC 17:15 An entity shall present the difference described in paragraph 14 of IFRIC 17 as a separate line item in profit or loss.
IFRIC 17:14 Note: When an entity settles the dividend payable, it shall recognise the difference, if any, between the carrying
amount of the assets distributed and the carrying amount of the dividend payable in profit or loss.
IFRIC 17:16 An entity shall disclose the following information, if applicable:
a) the carrying amount of the dividend payable at the beginning and end of the period; and
b) the increase or decrease in the carrying amount recognised in the period in accordance with paragraph 13 of
IFRIC 17 as result of a change in the fair value of the assets to be distributed.
IFRIC 17:13 Note: At the end of each reporting period and at the date of settlement, the entity shall review and adjust the
carrying amount of the dividend payable, with any changes in the carrying amount of the dividend payable
recognised in equity as adjustments to the amount of the distribution.
IFRIC 17:17 If, after the end of a reporting period but before the financial statements are authorised for issue, an entity declares a
dividend to distribute a non-cash asset, it shall disclose:
a) the nature of the asset to be distributed;
b) the carrying amount of the asset to be distributed as of the end of the reporting period; and
c) the estimated fair value of the asset to be distributed as of the end of the reporting period, if it is different from
its carrying amount, and the information about the method used to determine that fair value required by
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosure paragraph 27(a) and (b).
173
IFRIC 17 Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRIC 19 which provides
guidance on extinguishing financial liabilities with equity instruments.
None
IFRIC 19 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments was issued in November 2009. The Interpretation is
applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2010.
IFRIC 19:11 An entity shall disclose a gain or loss recognised in accordance with paragraphs 9 and 10 of IFRIC 19 as a separate line
item in profit or loss or in the notes.
IFRIC 19:12 An entity shall apply this Interpretation for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2010. Earlier application is
permitted. If an entity applies this interpretation for a period beginning before 1 July 2010, it shall disclose that fact.
174
IFRIC 19 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of SIC-27. Not all transactions that
involve the legal form of a lease will fall within the definition of a lease for the purposes of IAS 17 Leases. In some
cases, such transactions may be designed to achieve a particular tax effect, which is shared between the parties, rather
than conveying the right to use an asset. SIC-27 addresses issues that may arise when an entity enters into a
transaction or a series of structured transactions with an unrelated party or parties that involves the legal form of a
lease.
None
None
SIC-27:10 All aspects of an arrangement involving the legal form of a lease but that does not, in substance, involve a lease under
IAS 17 (as determined using the principles set out in SIC-27) shall be considered in determining the appropriate disclosures
that are necessary to understand the arrangement and the accounting treatment adopted.
An entity shall disclose the following in each period that an arrangement exists that involves the legal form of a lease but
that does not, in substance, involve a lease under IAS 17 (as determined using the principles set out in SIC-27):
SIC-27:10(a) a) a description of the arrangement, including:
i) the underlying asset and any restrictions on its use;
ii) the life and other significant terms of the arrangement; and
iii) the transactions that are linked together, including any options; and
SIC-27:10(b) b) the accounting treatment applied to any fee received, the amount recognised as income in the period, and the line
item of the statement of comprehensive income in which it is included.
Notes:
SIC-27:11 1) The disclosures required in accordance with paragraph 10 of SIC-27 (see above) should be provided individually for
each arrangement or in aggregate for each class of arrangement. A class is a grouping of arrangements with
underlying assets of a similar nature (e.g. power plants).
SIC-27:9 2) Any fee that the entity (as a lessor) might receive from the Investor (which may be the mechanism used by the
Investor to share a tax advantage with the entity) shall be presented in the statement of comprehensive income
based on its economic substance and nature.
175
SIC-27 Evaluating the Substance of Transactions involving the Legal Form of a Lease

This section of the checklist addresses the presentation and disclosure requirements of SIC-29, which deals with what
information should be disclosed in the notes in the financial statements of the operator and the grantor involved in a
service concession arrangement. Under such arrangements, an entity (the operator) may enter into an arrangement
with another entity (the grantor) to provide services that give the public access to major economic and social facilities.
The grantor may be a public or private sector entity, including a governmental body. Examples of service concession
arrangements involve water treatment and supply facilities, motorways, car parks, tunnels, bridges, airports and
telecommunication networks. Examples of arrangements that are not service concession arrangements include an
entity outsourcing the operation of its internal services (e.g. employee cafeteria, building maintenance, and accounting
or information technology functions).
Following the implementation of IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements, SIC-29 has been retiled and certain
consequential amendments made. These consequential amendments are reflected in this section.
None
None
SIC-29:6 All aspects of a service concession arrangement shall be considered in determining the appropriate disclosures in the notes.
An operator and a grantor shall disclose the following in each period:
SIC-29:6(a) a) a description of the arrangement;
SIC-29:6(b) b) significant terms of the arrangement that may affect the amount, timing and certainty of future cash flows (e.g. the
period of the concession, re-pricing dates and the basis upon which re-pricing or re-negotiation is determined);
SIC-29:6(c) c) the nature and extent (e.g. quantity, time period or amount as appropriate) of:
i) rights to use specified assets;
ii) obligations to provide or rights to expect provision of services;
iii) obligations to acquire or build items of property, plant and equipment;
iv) obligations to deliver or rights to receive specified assets at the end of the concession period;
v) renewal and termination options; and
vi) other rights and obligations (e.g. major overhauls); and
SIC-29:6(d) d) changes in the arrangement occurring during the period; and
SIC-29:6(e) e) how the service arrangement has been classified.
SIC-29:6A An operator shall disclose the amount of revenue and profits or losses recognised in the period on exchanging
construction services for a financial asset or an intangible asset.
SIC-29:7 Note: The disclosures required by paragraph 6 of SIC-29 (see above) should be provided individually for each service
concession arrangement or in aggregate for each class of service concession arrangements. A class is a
grouping of service concession arrangements involving services of a similar nature (e.g. toll collections,
telecommunications and water treatment services).
176
SIC-29 Service Concession Arrangements: Disclosures

Deloitte IFRS resources
In addition to this publication, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited has a range of tools and publications to assist in implementing and reporting
under IFRSs. These include:
www.iasplus.com Updated daily, iasplus.com is your one-stop shop for information related to IFRSs.
Deloitte’s IFRS e-Learning modules e-Learning IFRS training materials, available without charge at
www.iasplus.com
IFRS in Focus newsletter Newsletters issued at the time of release of new and revised Standards and
Interpretations, exposure drafts and discussion documents, including summaries
of the documents and consideration of principal amendments. To subscribe, visit
www.iasplus.com
IFRIC Review Summarises matters discussed at the IFRS Interpretations Committee meetings.
To subscribe, visit www.iasplus.com
IFRS on point Highlights the month’s critical financial reporting developments. To subscribe, visit
www.iasplus.com
IFRS Project Insights Provides a summary, by project, of the current status of the project, a high-level
summary of key decisions reached to date, key considerations for entities, and
forthcoming deadlines.
iGAAP 2011: A guide to IFRS reporting 4th edition (November 2010). A comprehensivie guide to the requirements of IFRSs.
IFRSs in your pocket Published in several languages, this pocket-sized guide includes summaries of
all IASB Standards and Interpretations, updates on agenda projects, and other
IASB-related information.
IFRSs and US GAAP: A pocket comparison A summary of the principal differences in pocket-sized format, including a status
report as to what is being done about each difference.
Presentation and disclosure checklist Checklist incorporating all of the presentation and disclosure requirements of
IFRSs.
iGAAP 2010 6th edition (June 2010). Guidance on how to apply these
Financial instruments: IAS 32, IAS 39, IFRS 7 and IFRS 9 complex Standards, including illustrative examples and interpretations.
explained

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of
member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a detailed
description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and its member firms.
“Deloitte” is the brand under which tens of thousands of dedicated professionals in independent firms throughout the world
collaborate to provide audit, consulting, financial advisory, risk management, and tax services to selected clients. These firms are
members of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (DTTL), a UK private company limited by guarantee. Each member firm provides
services in a particular geographic area and is subject to the laws and professional regulations of the particular country or countries
in which it operates. DTTL does not itself provide services to clients. DTTL and each DTTL member firm are separate and distinct
legal entities, which cannot obligate each other. DTTL and each DTTL member firm are liable only for their own acts or omissions
and not those of each other. Each DTTL member firm is structured differently in accordance with national laws, regulations,
customary practice, and other factors, and may secure the provision of professional services in its territory through subsidiaries,
affiliates, and/or other entities.
This publication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or its and their
affiliates are, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional
advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for
any decision or action that may affect your finances or your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may
affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser.
None of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or its and their respective affiliates shall be responsible for any loss
whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this publication.
© 2010 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
Designed and produced by The Creative Studio at Deloitte, London. 7624A

Ias and ifrs

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Ias and ifrs

Recently uploaded

Ias and ifrs