[IJET V2I2P30] Authors: AnkurGheewala, Jay Chanawala,Nikhil Jadav,Modi Rishit, Chirag Machhi5,Jenish Rana
1 like•344 views
The document discusses the use of Distribution Static Synchronous Compensators (DSTATCOM) for improving power quality in distribution systems affected by unbalanced and nonlinear loads. It compares various control schemes, including Instantaneous Reactive Power Theory (IRPT) and Fryze Power Theory (FPT), for reactive power compensation and presents simulation results to validate their effectiveness. Findings indicate that while both control strategies are effective, FPT demonstrates superior performance in terms of harmonics mitigation and load balancing.
![International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 2 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2016
ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 184
AnkurGheewala1
, Jay Chanawala2
,Nikhil Jadav3
,Modi Rishit4
, Chirag Machhi5
,Jenish
Rana6
(Electrical Engineering Department, Shroff S. R. Rotary Institute of Chemical Technology,Ankleshwar)
I. INTRODUCTION
Power systems voltage and current waveforms are
deteriorates by highly use of power converters and nonlinear
loads. Harmonics are generated because of high frequency of
switching of power electronics converters. The presence of
harmonics in voltage and current waveforms increases the
power loss.The unbalanced load current with large reactive
components leads results in voltage fluctuations and
unbalance due to the source (system) impedances. Because of
unbalanced current the harmonic components increases and
reduction in power factor of distribution network. A shunt
compensator also helps to reduce voltage fluctuation sat the
point of common coupling (PCC). If the source voltages are
unbalanced and varying, it is also possible for a shunt
compensator to achieve this[1]. In distribution system the
power quality can be improved by custom power devices
which can able to exchange of extra demanded reactive power
which are also called FACTS devices. The commonly FACTS
controller devices used for improving the power
quality are as follows:
Static VAR Compensators (SVC)
Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitors (TCSC)
Static Compensators (STATCOM)
Static Series Synchronous Compensators (SSSC)
Unified Power Flow Controllers (UPFC)
Among of the various distribution FACTS controllers,
Distribution Static Compensator (DSTATCOM) is an
important shunt compensator which has the capability to solve
power quality problems faced by distribution systems.
DSTATCOM has effectively replaced a Static VAR
Compensator (SVC), as it takes large response time in
addition it is connected with the passive filter banks and
capable only steady state reactive power compensation. A
DSTATCOM is a Voltage Source Inverter (VSI) based
Load Balancing and Harmonic Elimination
Using Distribution Static Synchronous
Compensator (DSTATCOM)
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS
Abstract:
Distribution Static Synchronous Compensator (DSTATCOM) is a shunt compensating device which is used
to improve current profile by exchanging of reactive power with unbalanced and nonlinear load. DSTATCOM is a
shunt compensating device used for power quality improvement in distribution systems. Relevant solutions are
applied for harmonics, fluctuation of voltage, voltage deviation, unbalance of three phase voltage and current and
frequency deviation. Different controlling schemes such as Phase Control Method (PCM), Fryze Power Theory
(FPT), Synchronous Reference Frame Theory (SRFT) and Instantaneous Reactive Power Theory (IRPT) are used
for reactive power compensation with the help of Voltage source Inverter (VSI). In this project we are going to
balance the source current using different control schemes. The results of different source currents are compared
with a different control schemes in terms of active and reactive power and in terms of Total Harmonic Distortion
(THD) for nonlinear load using Fryze Power Theory (FPT) and Instantaneous Reactive Power Theory (IRPT).
Reference currents are generated by the different control schemes have been dynamically traced in a hysteresis
current controller. The performance of DSTATCOM for different control schemes is validated for load balancing
and harmonic elimination by using simulation models in MATLAB/SIMULINK
Keywords—DSTATCOM, Unbalanced load, Nonlinear load, Reactive power compensation, Reference
currents, Load balancing, Harmonic elimination](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ijet-v2i2p30-160609050010/85/IJET-V2I2P30-Authors-AnkurGheewala-Jay-Chanawala-Nikhil-Jadav-Modi-Rishit-Chirag-Machhi5-Jenish-Rana-1-320.jpg)
![International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 2 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2016
ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 186
inductance Lf are used to filter the high frequency components
of compensating current. The value of inductance Lf controls
the switching frequency of converter.
Fig.2 Basic block diagram of compensator
(1)Instantaneous Reactive Power Theory (IRPT):
This control scheme was invented by H. Akagi. The
basic block diagram of IRPT is as shown in fig..3. In this
algorithm instantaneous source voltages and load currents are
sensed and are transformed from a-b-c to α-β-0, which is
called Clark’s transformation [2].
Fig.3 Basic block diagram of IRPT
The Clark’s transformation of source voltage is given by
V
V
V
c
b
a
V
V
V
2
3
2
3
0
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
3
2
0
I
I
I
c
b
a
I
I
I
2
3
2
3
0
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
3
2
0
I
I
I
VV
VV
V
q
p
p
000
0
0
00
In three phase three wire system, io = 0 this implies
po= 0. Equation (3) would be reduced to
iq
p i
VV
VV
When the system is balanced, the instantaneous
active and reactive powers p and q can be decomposed into an
average and an oscillatory component. pdc and qdc are average
components and pac and qac are oscillatory part of real and
reactive instantaneous powers. The compensating currents are
calculated to compensate the instantaneous reactive power and
the oscillatory component of the instantaneous active power.
In this case the source transmits only the non-oscillating
component of active power. Therefore the reference source
currents in α-β co-ordinates are expressed as,
0
*
*
p
VV
VV dc
s
s
i
i
These currents can be transformed in a-b-c quantities
to find the reference currents in a-b-c coordinate.
i
i
i
sc
sb
sa
i
i
i
0
*
*
*
2
3
2
1
2
1
2
3
2
1
2
1
01
2
1
3
2
(2) FRYZE Power Theory (FPT):
The block diagram of this control algorithm is as shown in
fig.4 [3]. In this controlling algorithm the load current and the
source voltages are sensed and the active fryze conductance
Ge is calculated by,
222
sbsbsa
LcscLasbLasa
e
VVV
iViViV
G
Where,
iLa; iLb; iLc = Load current of phase a, phase b and phase c
respectively
Vsa; Vsb; Vsc = Source voltage of phase a, phase b and phase c
respectively
Then this signal Ge is fed to the LPF which is
denoted by Ḡe. The active instantaneous currents are
calculated as shown below:
iwa = isa = Ḡe Vsa
iwb = isb = Ḡe Vsb
iwc = isc = Ḡe Vsc
Where,
iwa; iwb; iwc = Active instantaneous current of phase a, phase b
and phase c respectively](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ijet-v2i2p30-160609050010/85/IJET-V2I2P30-Authors-AnkurGheewala-Jay-Chanawala-Nikhil-Jadav-Modi-Rishit-Chirag-Machhi5-Jenish-Rana-3-320.jpg)
[IJET V2I2P30] Authors: AnkurGheewala, Jay Chanawala,Nikhil Jadav,Modi Rishit, Chirag Machhi5,Jenish Rana
- 1. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 2 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2016 ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 184 AnkurGheewala1 , Jay Chanawala2 ,Nikhil Jadav3 ,Modi Rishit4 , Chirag Machhi5 ,Jenish Rana6 (Electrical Engineering Department, Shroff S. R. Rotary Institute of Chemical Technology,Ankleshwar) I. INTRODUCTION Power systems voltage and current waveforms are deteriorates by highly use of power converters and nonlinear loads. Harmonics are generated because of high frequency of switching of power electronics converters. The presence of harmonics in voltage and current waveforms increases the power loss.The unbalanced load current with large reactive components leads results in voltage fluctuations and unbalance due to the source (system) impedances. Because of unbalanced current the harmonic components increases and reduction in power factor of distribution network. A shunt compensator also helps to reduce voltage fluctuation sat the point of common coupling (PCC). If the source voltages are unbalanced and varying, it is also possible for a shunt compensator to achieve this[1]. In distribution system the power quality can be improved by custom power devices which can able to exchange of extra demanded reactive power which are also called FACTS devices. The commonly FACTS controller devices used for improving the power quality are as follows: Static VAR Compensators (SVC) Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitors (TCSC) Static Compensators (STATCOM) Static Series Synchronous Compensators (SSSC) Unified Power Flow Controllers (UPFC) Among of the various distribution FACTS controllers, Distribution Static Compensator (DSTATCOM) is an important shunt compensator which has the capability to solve power quality problems faced by distribution systems. DSTATCOM has effectively replaced a Static VAR Compensator (SVC), as it takes large response time in addition it is connected with the passive filter banks and capable only steady state reactive power compensation. A DSTATCOM is a Voltage Source Inverter (VSI) based Load Balancing and Harmonic Elimination Using Distribution Static Synchronous Compensator (DSTATCOM) RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Abstract: Distribution Static Synchronous Compensator (DSTATCOM) is a shunt compensating device which is used to improve current profile by exchanging of reactive power with unbalanced and nonlinear load. DSTATCOM is a shunt compensating device used for power quality improvement in distribution systems. Relevant solutions are applied for harmonics, fluctuation of voltage, voltage deviation, unbalance of three phase voltage and current and frequency deviation. Different controlling schemes such as Phase Control Method (PCM), Fryze Power Theory (FPT), Synchronous Reference Frame Theory (SRFT) and Instantaneous Reactive Power Theory (IRPT) are used for reactive power compensation with the help of Voltage source Inverter (VSI). In this project we are going to balance the source current using different control schemes. The results of different source currents are compared with a different control schemes in terms of active and reactive power and in terms of Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) for nonlinear load using Fryze Power Theory (FPT) and Instantaneous Reactive Power Theory (IRPT). Reference currents are generated by the different control schemes have been dynamically traced in a hysteresis current controller. The performance of DSTATCOM for different control schemes is validated for load balancing and harmonic elimination by using simulation models in MATLAB/SIMULINK Keywords—DSTATCOM, Unbalanced load, Nonlinear load, Reactive power compensation, Reference currents, Load balancing, Harmonic elimination
- 2. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 2 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2016 ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 185 FACTS controller sharing similar concepts with a STATCOM used at transmission level. Moreover SVCs which have been largely used in arc welding plants for voltage flicker mitigation have been replaced by DSTATCOMs because SVCs exhibit limited reduction of instantaneous flicker level.A DSTATCOM is basically a Voltage Source Converter (VSC) based FACTS controller sharing many similar concepts with that of a STATCOM used at transmission level. A STATCOM at the transmission level handles only fundamental reactive power and provides voltage support while as a DSTATCOM is employed at the distribution level or at the load end for power factor improvement and voltage regulation. DSTATCOM have similar functionality as compared to shunt active filter, it can work as a shunt active filter to eliminate unbalance and distortion in source current and supply voltage. The performance of the DSTATCOM depends on the control algorithm i.e. the extraction of the current components. So, for this, there are various control algorithms for the control of DSTATCOM block depending on various theories and strategies like phase shift control, instantaneous PQ theory, and synchronous frame theory. Each of the algorithms specified have their own merits and demerits. In this dissertation there are five control strategies have been implemented to compensate the required reactive power at the load side. Phase control method has used for enhancement of power transmission system performance. The other control strategies are Synchronous frame theory, instantaneous PQ theory and fryze method used for compensation of the unbalanced linear load and nonlinear power electronic load. The hysteresis current control strategy has implemented to compensate reactive power requirement of single-phase load. II. Distribution STATCOM The DSTATCOM is a voltage source inverter which is used for the modification of bus voltage sags. DSTATCOM is connected to the distribution network through a standard distribution power transformer. The DSTATCOM is continuously monitoring the line waveform and provide leading or lagging compensating current. The single line diagram of DSTATCOM is shown in fig.1. DSTATCOM consists of a dc capacitor, one or more converter modules, an L-C filter, a distribution transformer and a PWM control technique. In this implementation, a voltage-source inverter converts a dc voltage into a three-phase ac voltage that is synchronized with, and connected to, the ac line through a small tie reactor and capacitor (L-C filter). Fig.1 Single line diagram of DSTATCOM The main principle of DSTATCOM is as follow: 1. Vi > VM → DSTATCOM will supply the reactive power 2. Vi < VM → DSTATCOM will absorb the reactive power 3. Vi=VM → DSTATCOM will not exchange the reactive power which is also a balanced condition. Where, Vi = Inverter voltage in volt VM = Point of common coupling voltage in volt VS = Source voltage in volt Eachcontrol algorithm calculatesthe compensated current of compensator to supply or absorb the reactive power. The compensated current is given by IC = IL – IS (A) Where, IC = Compensated current in ampere IL = Load current in ampere IS = Source current in ampere III. Control Algorithms The basic block diagram of compensator is as shown in fig.2. The main function of any control scheme is to generate required reference currents by sensing the load current and source current. Reference currents are faded to the hysteresis current controller. Hysteresis current controller generates the pulses which are injected to the gate of IGBT switches. According to these pulses the compensator supply or absorb the current and make the system balanced. The compensator can give desired performance as long as its bandwidth is sufficient to track the fluctuations in the load. In this configuration VSC is used with the dc storage capacitor. Two IGBT switches are used in one leg and three legs are connected in parallel with the dc capacitor. In this operation the capacitor must be precharged to a sufficient value such that it can give the better tracking performance to generate reference currents. Interfacing of filter resistance Rf and
- 3. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 2 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2016 ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 186 inductance Lf are used to filter the high frequency components of compensating current. The value of inductance Lf controls the switching frequency of converter. Fig.2 Basic block diagram of compensator (1)Instantaneous Reactive Power Theory (IRPT): This control scheme was invented by H. Akagi. The basic block diagram of IRPT is as shown in fig..3. In this algorithm instantaneous source voltages and load currents are sensed and are transformed from a-b-c to α-β-0, which is called Clark’s transformation [2]. Fig.3 Basic block diagram of IRPT The Clark’s transformation of source voltage is given by V V V c b a V V V 2 3 2 3 0 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 0 I I I c b a I I I 2 3 2 3 0 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 0 I I I VV VV V q p p 000 0 0 00 In three phase three wire system, io = 0 this implies po= 0. Equation (3) would be reduced to iq p i VV VV When the system is balanced, the instantaneous active and reactive powers p and q can be decomposed into an average and an oscillatory component. pdc and qdc are average components and pac and qac are oscillatory part of real and reactive instantaneous powers. The compensating currents are calculated to compensate the instantaneous reactive power and the oscillatory component of the instantaneous active power. In this case the source transmits only the non-oscillating component of active power. Therefore the reference source currents in α-β co-ordinates are expressed as, 0 * * p VV VV dc s s i i These currents can be transformed in a-b-c quantities to find the reference currents in a-b-c coordinate. i i i sc sb sa i i i 0 * * * 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 01 2 1 3 2 (2) FRYZE Power Theory (FPT): The block diagram of this control algorithm is as shown in fig.4 [3]. In this controlling algorithm the load current and the source voltages are sensed and the active fryze conductance Ge is calculated by, 222 sbsbsa LcscLasbLasa e VVV iViViV G Where, iLa; iLb; iLc = Load current of phase a, phase b and phase c respectively Vsa; Vsb; Vsc = Source voltage of phase a, phase b and phase c respectively Then this signal Ge is fed to the LPF which is denoted by Ḡe. The active instantaneous currents are calculated as shown below: iwa = isa = Ḡe Vsa iwb = isb = Ḡe Vsb iwc = isc = Ḡe Vsc Where, iwa; iwb; iwc = Active instantaneous current of phase a, phase b and phase c respectively
- 4. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 2 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2016 ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 187 isa; isb; isc = Source current of phase a, phase b and phase c respectively Fig.4 Basic block diagram of FPT Then the reference current are calculated by, i*Ca = iLa - iwa i*Cb = iLb - iwb i*Cc = iLc - iwc Where, iCa; iCb; iCc = Measured compensating current of phase a ,b and c respectively i*Ca; i*Cb; i*Cc = Calculated compensating current of phase a, b and c respectively This calculated compensated current is compared by measured compensated current and the generated error signal is given tothe voltage source inverter which is generated triggering pulses and is fed to the gate of the inverter. IV. SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Fig.5 Waveform of (i) load, source and compensated current v/s time (ii) active and reactive power v/s time (iii) source voltage and current of phase of phase-a v/s time (iv) power factor v/s time (nonlinear load) for IRPT (i)
- 5. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 2 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2016 ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 188 (ii) (iii) (iv) Fig.6 Waveform of (i) load, source and compensated current v/s time (ii) active and reactive power v/s time (iii) source voltage and current of phase of phase-a v/s time (iv) power factor v/s time (linear unbalanced Δ-connected load)for IRPT (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Fig.7 Waveform of (i) load, source and compensated current v/s time (ii) active and reactive power v/s time (iii) source voltage and current of phase of phase-a v/s time (iv) power factor v/s time (nonlinear load) for FPT (i)
- 6. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 2 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2016 ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 189 (ii) (iii) (iv) Fig.8 Waveform of (i) load, source and compensated current v/s time (ii) active and reactive power v/s time (iii) source voltage and current of phase of phase-a v/s time (iv) power factor v/s time (linear unbalanced Δ-connected load) for FPT V. CONCLUSIONS After implement of these two algorithms successfully, there is a making comparison between IRPT and FPT in terms of rms value of source current. From table-I results the conclusions are made as shown in table-II. TABLE II: Comparison of IRPT and FPT Objectives of Compensation Control Scheme IRPT FPT Computational Complexity High Simple Reactive Power Compensation Good Excellent Load Balancing Excellent Good Harmonics Mitigation Good Excellent APPENDIX PARAMETERS VALUE Source parameters VS (rms value) = 415 V, RS = 0.01 Ω, LS = 2 mH Compensators parameters Cdc = 500 μF, Rf = 0.01 Ω, Lf = 15 mH Linear unbalanced Δ- connected load Zlab = 50+ j 62.8 Ω, Zlbc = 25+ j 54.95 Ω, Zlca = 50 + j 70.65 Ω
- 7. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 2 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2016 ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 190 REFERENCES 1. K.R. Padiyar, ``FACTS CONTROLLERS IN POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION”. 2. HIROFUMI AKAGI, YOSHIHIRA KANAZAWA AND AKIRA NABAE, “Instantaneous Reactive Power Compensators Comprising Switching Devices without Energy Storage Components ", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, VOL. IA-20, NO. 3, MAY/JUNE 1984. 3. Jaruppanan P, Kanta Mahapatra, Jeyaraman.K and Jeraldine Viji, “Fryze Power Theory with Adaptive- HCC based Active Power Line Conditioners", International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPS), Dec 22-24, 2011, IIT-Madras.