Innovative strategies for energy optimization

IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 11 | Nov-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 462
INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES FOR ENERGY OPTIMIZATION
S. Bottillo1
, L. Cedola2
, R. de Lieto Vollaro3
, A. Vallati4
1
Ph.D. Student, 4
Assistant Professor, DIAEE, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
2
Assistant Professor, DIMA, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Engineering, University of Roma Tre, Rome, Italy,
simone.bottillo@uniroma1.it, luca.cedola@uniroma1.it, roberto.delietovollaro@uniroma3.it,
andrea.vallati@uniroma1.it
Abstract
Optimization of energy production systems is a relevant issue that must be considered in order to follow the fossil fuels consumption
reduction policies and the CO2 emission regulation. Increasing electricity production from renewable resources (e.g. photovoltaic
systems and wind farms) is desirable but its unpredictability is a cause of problems for the main grid stability. The multi-energy
system represents an efficient solution, by realizing an interface among renewable energy sources, energy storage systems and
conventional power generators. Direct consequences of multi-energy systems are wider energy flexibility and benefits for the electric
grid. In this study the performances of a multi-energy system in dynamic regime have been evaluated and a comparison with a
conventional system has been performed. The results show how this innovative energetic approach can provide a cost reduction in
power supply and energy fees of 40% and 25% respectively and CO2 emission decrease attained around 18%. Furthermore, the
multi-energy system taken as case of study has been optimized through the utilization of three different type of energy storage (Pb-Ac
batteries, Flywheels and Micro-Caes).
Keywords: Multi-Energy System, Cost of Energy, Energy Storage
----------------------------------------------------------------------***------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. INTRODUCTION
The rise of CO2 level in the atmosphere is the main
responsible for global warming and the international
community set a deadline to achieve some targets in the Kyoto
Protocol. The European Union accepted the recommendations
established in the agreement and it has outlined a strategy in
order to achieve three different targets (called 20-20-20)
within 2020: the 20% reduction of greenhouse gases
emissions, the 20% increase of energy production from
renewable sources and the 20% increase of energy efficiency
[1-2]. The following guidelines have been outlined: promoting
the electricity distribution grid with generators connected,
incentivizing the energy production from renewable sources
and from CHP systems (combined heat and power) applied in
residential, service and commercial sectors, developing the
sustainable mobility through the utilization of electric
vehicles, promoting a rational use of electricity in order to
decrease the energy consumption. For this reason, it is
necessary to study multi-energy or hybrid systems: systems
which use two or more energy sources, energy converters,
fuels [3] in order to meet the energy demand of a user which
can be a single building, a group of buildings or a factory.
These systems are inherently flexible and allow to exploit the
renewable sources in the best way, following thermal and
electric demands, increasing the reliability of service
continuity through the utilization of CHP generators and
reducing operation costs. Multi-energy systems play a crucial
role in a political context inclined to the distributed
generation. It is possible to control the power production and
energy demand providing a valuable contribution to the
stabilization of the electric main grid, by including energy
storage systems and endothermic generators. It is necessary to
communicate with a “smart grid” by exchanging information
and by controlling the energy flows, in order to produce: an
increase of energy saving, a reduction of pollutant emissions,
the possibility of realizes stand-alone systems, relieving
congestion in the electric grid during the peak hours of the day
[4]. As the technology of electronic devices continue to
improve, a perfect management of systems connected to
different kind of energy storage (electric and thermal) can be
realized. The optimal management of energetic flows in
complex systems must be managed by an important device:
the energy hub (a smart system used to analyze the situation
and manage the components of the plant efficiently). It has
been demonstrated that an efficient energy-hub produces a
remarkable reduction of costs, greenhouse gases emissions
and energy saving [5]. The energy-hub is considered as unit
where the energetic flows are converted, conditioned and
eventually stored [6]; as input it requires an amount of energy
(electric energy from the grid, natural gas, energy from
renewable sources) and it ensures the supply for several
services, such as: electric and thermal energy, cooling,
compressed air, etc. The redundant connections that could be
established between input and output inside the energy-hub
have two significant consequences: an increase of reliability of

__________________________________________________________________________________________
resources supply and the most advantageous choice among the
various options. Brenna et al. [7] proposed a model that allows
integration between different independent subsystems, such as
final users and high efficiency buildings, with CHP in a
Sustainable Energy Microsystem (SEM), aimed at the
management of the city of the future, the smart-city. The aim
of this study is to evaluate a multi-energy system through a
dynamic analysis of performance, in order to obtain a primary
energy saving, a reduction of operating costs and CO2
emissions, compared to a conventional plant. It will be also
shown how the various plant components must operate in
order to obtain the desired savings. Moreover, three different
kind of electric storage will be considered, in order to evaluate
their impact by changing key parameters. An economic and
financial assessment will be carried out in order to verify the
investment feasibility, which is the necessary condition for the
plant realization.
2. NUMERICAL MODELS
In this study a system of analysis and optimization through the
utilization of two mathematical models in cascade, is
proposed. The study of heat exchanges and electricity is
performed through a dynamic system, using the software
TRNSYS [8]; the obtained results are used as inputs for
Homer Energy [9] that is used to perform the energetic
optimization process and to evaluate the economic benefit of
the investment. The implemented model is based on the time
series: for every time step the model solves the energy balance
for each component and correlates it with the other
components of the same system. For each component, the
model evaluates the costs of energy production, giving priority
to the lower ones. The evaluation of the costs is carried out
considering the cost of investment, maintenance and fuel
purchase.
3. CASE OF STUDY
In this study, it has been chosen to perform an upgrade of
energy efficiency of an area characterized by continuous
operations during the day and high power consumption;
furthermore the presence of large spaces solves the problems
of plant installation.
Fig -1: (a) Yearly trend of energy demand for heating (Q heat)
and cooling (Q cool), obtained with TRNSYS; (b) Yearly total
energy demand [kWh/year] for heating and cooling.
The structure is characterized by a surface area of 1600 m2
and
a volume of 8000 m3
. Currently the plant is constituted by a
diesel fired boiler (400 kW) for the heating and the hot water
production, and two refrigeration units (each one 140 kW).
The energy demand of the structure during the year has been
studied, through a dynamic analysis; in Fig.1 (a)(b) are shown
the results. In Fig.2 is shown the trend of electric power
absorbed from the grid during the year; it can be observed that
the electricity demand is continuous; the average value is 150
kW and total electricity demand during the year is 1315624
kWh. The cost of energy consumption and diesel oil purchase,
in 2012, has been 268942 €; the Net Present Cost for 20 years
of operation is 3573.822 € and the yearly CO2 emission is
765.7 t/year.
Fig -2: Yearly trend of electricity purchased from the grid

__________________________________________________________________________________________
4. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION: MULTI-ENERGY
SYSTEM
In order to obtain a reduction of fuel consumption, cost of
energy and CO2 emissions, the implementation of a multi-
energy system has been proposed (Fig.3). It consists of a CHP
reciprocating internal combustion engine and photovoltaic
panels (100 kWp); the engine is supplied by natural gas that
has a lower carbon content compared to diesel fuel. The
thermal load is satisfied by CHP engine and by an integrated
boiler fueled by natural gas. The price of natural gas,
considering the tax relief, is 0.469 €/nm3
; the price of
electricity depends by the time slot (0.18 €/kWh, 0.15 €/kWh
and 0.10 €/kWh). For generators characterized by an electric
capacity lower than 200 kW, it is possible to carry out the on-
site exchange, by inserting into the grid the excess of electric
production; the sale price has been set at 0.09 €/kWh. The unit
costs of the components are: for photovoltaic panels,
2500€/kW, for the inverter, 300€/kW, for the CHP engine,
1500 €/kW. For the optimization process, several simulations
have been considered in order to compare three different sizes
of CHP engine (100 kW, 150 kW and 200 kW). Regarding the
electric power absorbed from the grid, two constrains have
been imposed: 100 kW and 150 kW, which obviously have an
influence on operating hours of the generator. Therefore, six
simulations have been performed. Fig. 4 shown the Net
Present Cost for each configuration considered and for the
current plant. It can be observed that there aren’t remarkable
differences among the six configurations; even though the
configurations 4 and 6 are characterized by the highest cost of
investment, they have also the highest profits due to the
increase of self-generated energy and to the relative increase
of sale of White Certificates.
Fig -3: Multi-energy system implemented in Homer Energy
From the economic point of view the configuration 1 is the
best, followed by the configuration 4 which is a compromise
between all the configurations. In Fig. 5 the distribution of
electricity production for the six configurations considered, is
shown; as it can be seen, for configuration 1, 2 and 3, the
amount of energy purchased from the grid is approximately
50%, while for configurations 4, 5 and 6 it tends to decrease
up to 11%.
Fig -4: (a) Configurations considered; (b) Net Present Cost of
the configurations considered and the current plant.
Fig -5: Distribution of electricity production for the six
configurations.
Once again two different scenarios are proposed: for the first
three configurations, there is a strong dependence on the price
of electricity, on the other hand, configuration 5 and 6 are
characterized by a strong dependence of natural gas price;
configuration 4 represents a good compromise among the
others. From thermal point of view, it can be observed how the
CHP supplies the thermal load (Fig. 6); in all configurations
there is a sufficient production of heat and the use of boiler is
mainly concentrated in the hours when the CHP is off. Even in
configuration 1, where CHP size is 100 kW, the heat produced
by the boiler is less than 20%. Fig. 7 shows the value of the
Cost of Energy for the various configurations considered and
for the current plant; the COE of configuration 6 is the lower
(COE6 = 0.133 €/kWh), which corresponds to the maximum

__________________________________________________________________________________________
production of electricity. However, the Cost of Energy of
configuration 4 (COE4 = 0.135 €/kWh) is very similar to the
lowest one; considering the Net Present Cost (Fig.4(b)) and
the Cost of Energy, configuration 4 is preferred over the
configuration 6. In Fig. 8 the CO2 emissions for the
configurations, are shown; it is calculated as the sum of the
part emitted by the internal combustion engine and the one
related to the electricity absorbed by the main grid, through
the emission factor of the Italian grid that is 523 g/kWh.
Fig -6: Thermal load distribution for the six configurations
considered.
Fig-7: Cost of Energy for the six configuration considered and
the current plant.
Fig -8: CO2 emissions for the six configurations considered
and the current plant.
Therefore, configuration 4 represents a good compromise with
a low COE, which is much lower than the one of the current
plant (COEcp = 0.170 €/kWh); the limitation of the electrical
absorption at 150 kW is a preferable solution for the CHP,
which works for less hours per year, compared with
configuration 6, determining a decrease of costs of
maintenance and natural gas consumption. The benefits of
configuration 4, compared to the current plant, are: an energy
saving of 97500 €/year, a decrease of COE from 0.170 €/kWh
to 0.135 €/kWh and a decrease of CO2 emissions of 139
Mg/year. The Primary Energy Saving (PES) index, expressed
in Eq.1, for configuration 4 is 34.5%, equivalent to 71.6 tep.
Eq. 1
5. MULTI-ENERGY SYSTEM WITH ELECTRIC
STORAGE
In the next few years, a quick and extensive diffusion of
energy storage systems, is expected. Conventional power
plants are forced to work with high variations, determining the
instability of the main grid, because of the increase of energy
production from renewable sources and to their non-
programmability. The storage system represents a solution for
this problem, by: limiting the effects of intermittency [10],
separating the time energy production from renewable sources
and its consumption and leveling the energy dispatched to the
grid. Moreover, in countries where the difference of cost of
energy is high, between the peak hours and the night hours,
the possibility of making profits is realistic [11]. In this study,
an evaluation of the effects produced by the adoption of three
different energy storage system, has been performed. The
systems considered are: the Pb-Ac batteries [12], which
represent a proven and reliable technology, even if they are
characterized by a short life and a low efficiency; the
Flywheels, which are kinetic energy storage systems
characterized by a high efficiency and a high unit cost; the
Micro-Caes (compressed air energy storage), characterized by
low efficiency, an intermediate unit cost and long life [13]. In
Fig. 9(a) are shown the characteristics of the three storage
systems [14] and in Fig. 9(b) is shown the configuration plant
with the Pb-Ac, Flywheels and Micro-Caes. For each
technology of storage system, several sizes (electric
capacities) have been considered: 25 kWh, 50 kWh, 100 kWh,
150 kWh and 200 kWh, in order to evaluate their effects on
the energetic and economic parameters and to optimize the
system. In Fig.10 is shown the Cost of Energy (Fig.10(a)) and
the Operating Cost (Fig.10(b)) of the multi-energy system,
using different sizes of each storage system, compared with
the values (continuous lines) without the energy storage. As it
can be seen in Fig.10, the multi-energy system equipped with
Micro-Caes or Pb-Ac batteries, has a competitive Cost of

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Energy up to the size of 100 kWh, while the Flywheel system
is disadvantaged by its high cost of investment.
Fig -9: (a) Characteristics of the three storage systems
considered; (b) Configuration plant of the multi-energy system
with the three storage systems considered.
Fig -10: Cost of Energy (a) and Operating Cost (b) of the
multi-energy system with different sizes of each storage
systems, compared with the values (continuous lines) without
storage system.
The annual operating costs for electricity and heat supply are
lower for each size of Micro-Caes considered and for
Flywheels, up to the size of 100 kWh. This trends are due to
operation of the storage system: during the evening and the
night it is charged, while it is discharged during the hours
when the cost of electricity is high. In Fig. 11 are shown the
daily charge/discharge trends of each storage system
considered (size 50 kWh). As it can be noticed (Fig.12) the
model prefers to discharge the storage system during the
central hours of the day or when the photovoltaic production
decreases, causing a time-shift of the peak of electric power
requested from the grid (as shown in Fig.13). It produces
benefits for the main grid, which is particularly congested
during the central hours of the day, when industrial plants and
most of the users are fully operative.
Fig -11: Daily charge/discharge trends (battery state of charge
during a day) for the three storage systems, characterized by a
size of 50 kWh: (a) Pb-Ac batteries, (b) Flywheels, (c) Micro-
Caes.
Fig -12: Operation time series for each component of the
multi-energy system, equipped with a Pb-Ac (50 kWh), during
a summer day.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
CONCLUSIONS
In order to face the increasing growth of energy consumption
of the modern society and to reduce the emissions of
greenhouse gases in compliance with international
agreements, the problem of energy saving related to the
responsible utilization of the energy sources is becoming
important. The energy upgrading of the existing buildings can
represent a valid contribution. In this study, a method for the
energy upgrading has been proposed; an energy-intensive
user, characterized by outdated plants, has been considered
and an alternative solution has been evaluated. The results
obtained are: an operating cost reduction of 97510 €/year; a
cost of energy reduction (from 0.170 €/kWh to 0.130 €/kWh);
a reduction of CO2 emission of 139 Mg/year. Furthermore,
three different energy storage systems has been considered:
Pb-Ac batteries, Flywheels and Micro-Caes. The results show
that storage systems and CHP are effective in co-operation,
during the hours of peak load demand. The model proposed in
this study is a flexible system and it has a positive impact on
the main grid; moreover, the presence of storage systems
produces an increase on the flexibility, through interactions
with the components of the multi-energy system. A systematic
application of this kind of systems can produce a significantly
reduction of electricity absorbed from the main grid,
producing in turn several benefits, such as a reduction of CO2
emissions and a time-shift of the peak of electric power
requested from the grid, which produces a decongestion of the
main grid in the central hours of the day.
REFERENCES
[1]. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of
energy from renewable sources and amending and
subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and
2003/30/EC.
[2]. Directive 2004/8/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 11 February 2004 on the promotion of
cogeneration based on a useful heat demand in the internal
energy market.
[3]. Manwell J.F., Hybrid energy system, Encyclopedia of
Energy Volume 3, 2004.
[4]. ASCOMAC COGENA: i vantaggi dei sistemi
SDC/RIU/SEU abbinati a reti intelligenti
http://www.casaeclima.com/index.php?option=com_content&
view=article&id=16038:ascomac-cogena-i-vantaggi-dei-
sistemi-sdcriuseu-abbinati-a-reti-intelligenti&catid=1:latest-
news&Itemid=50.
[5]. A. Sharif, A. Almansoori, M. Fowler, A. Elkamel, K.
Alrafea, Design of an energy hub based on natural gas and
renewable energy sources. International Journal of Energy
Research. 2013.
[6]. E. Fabrizio, M. Filippi, La valutazione del sistema
multienergia a servizio dell’edificio: procedura di simulazione
dinamica attraverso la metodologia dell’energy hub, 63°
Congress ATI, 2008.
[7]. M. Brenna, M.C. Falvo, F. Foiadelli, L. Martirano, F.
Massaro, A. Vaccaro, Challenges in Energy system for the
smart-cities of the future. 2nd IEEE ENERGYCON
Conference & Exhibition, 2012 / Future Energy Grids and
Systems Symp.
[8]. www.trnsys.com
[9]. www.homerenergy.com
[10]. Lund H, Mathiesen BV, Energy System Analyses of
100% renewable energy system- The case of Denmark in year
2030 and 2050. Energy, May 2009.
[11]. Inage S-I. Prospect for a large scale energy storage in
decarbonized power grids. International Energy Agency. 2009.
[12]. F. Alessandrini, G. B. Appetecchi, M. Conte, Studio di
fattibilità tecnica sull’applicabilità delle batterie al litio nelle
reti elettriche – Stato dell’arte e limiti scientifici e tecnologici,
Report, ENEA, 2010.
[13]. Wenyi, Yongping Yang, A novel hybrid-fuel
Compressed Air Energy Storage System for China’s Situation,
ECOS, 2012.
[14]. Helder Lopes Ferreira, Raquel Garde, Gianluca Fulli,
Characterization of electrical energy storage technologies,
2012.
BIOGRAPHIES
Simone Bottillo was born in Rome, Italy, on
August 26, 1982. He received the bachelor’s
degree and the master’s degree in Mechanical
Engineering, from University of Rome “Roma
Tre” (Italy) in 2007 and 2012, respectively.
From January 2013 he is Temporary Research Associate
November 2013 he is Ph.D. Student in Energy and
Environment at DIAEE Department of University of Rome
“La Sapienza”. He is co-author of some scientific works about
urban comfort and urban heat exchanges, published in
international journals and conferences.
Luca Cedola, born in Rome Italy on
25/07/1969 received the M.S. degree in
Mechanical Engineering, and the Ph.D. degree
in Energy and Environmental Management
Systems in 1996 and 1999, respectively. From
2000 Research Associate and from 2009 Assistant Professor at
the Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering -
University of Rome “Sapienza” A significant part of the
research activity has also been developed in the framework of
private contracts signed from my department with public
bodies and private companies in the R&D field, industrial
innovation and technology, with particular attention to SMEs,
in the field of renewable energy. He is author or co-author of
about 30 scientific works, published in prominent international
journals and conferences on Energy and Environmental
Management systems.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Roberto de Lieto Vollaro was born in Rome
November 25, 1977, residing in Rome.
Bachelor's Degree (five-year vo) in Mechanical
Engineering at the University of Roma Tre on
July 13, 2003. PhD in Industrial Engineering -
XIX cycle, at the University of Perugia and was awarded the
title of Doctor of Philosophy in "Industrial Engineering" on 12
February 2007. Professor of Physics and Environmental
Technical Physics since 2005 at the Faculty of Architecture
Ludovico Quaroni's La Sapienza University for the Degree of
Architecture EU Adjunct Professor since 2009 teaching in
Acoustics and Lighting The day of December 16, 2011
becomes Research Professor "Confirmed" at the Department
of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of
Roma Tre. On 4 May 2012 he was elected with 287 votes as
representative on the Board of Directors of the University of
Roma Tre. On June 19, 2012 becomes Official Member of the
Budget Committee and the Commission supplies, services and
spaces of the University of Roma Tre.
Andrea Vallati was born in Roma, Italy, on
October 16, 1970. He received the M.S. degree
in Mechanical Engineering, and the Ph.D.
degree in Applied Physics, from University of
Ancona (Italy) in 1997 and 2001, respectively.
From 2006 he served as Assistant Professor at the Department
of "Fisica Tecnica" of the same University. Since 2005 he is
Professor of Energy and Applied Physics at the Faculty
Engineering of “'Sapienza” University of Rome. He is author
or co-author of about 40 scientific works, published in
prominent international journals and conferences on heat
transfer, thermodynamics and acoustics.

Innovative strategies for energy optimization

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Innovative strategies for energy optimization (20)

More from eSAT Publishing House (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Innovative strategies for energy optimization