INTERSTITIAL LUNG
DISEASE
Tee L. Guidotti, MD, MPH, DABT
Medical Advisory Services
OEMAC 2010
Benchmarks
 ACOEM Practice Guidelines
 Authoritative guidance, updated, evidence-based
 Lung Disease Guidelines in progress
 Occupational Interstitial Lung Disease
 Airways Disorders
 ATS 2004 Revised Criteria for the Diagnosis of Non-
Malignant Asbestos-Related Disease
 This presentation
 A general approach to ILD  OILD
 Specific ILDs, esp. pneumoconioses
 Implications
Medical Evaluation of Occupational
Lung Diseases - Modalities
Primarily diagnostic
 Chest film, CT
 Spirometry, DLCO
 Blood gases
 Methacholine
challenge
 Biopsy (Ca, IPF,
granulomatous
disease)
Primarily occupational
 Occupational history
 Impairment evaluation
 Provocative testing
(rare)
 Serology (for HP)
 Biopsy (avoid)
 Cardiopulmonary
exercise testing
What is the interstitium?
 Fabric of connective tissue that supports its many
structures
 Expands and contracts with ventilation
 Surrounds the air spaces, brings blood in close proximity
to air with separation but minimal impedance to
diffusion
 Serves as a conduit and fluid channel for lymphatic
drainage and the migration of immune cells
 Collects and sequesters a fraction of insoluble particles
that deposit in the lung
Interstitium and Alveolar Wall
Collagen bundles
Fibroblasts
Air space
rbc
What is interstitial disease?
 Acute
 Edema, per se or a stage on the way to alveolar
edema
 Infection (e.g. mycoplasma)
 Inflammation
 Chronic
 Fibrosis, end stage of inflammation
 Often involves some degree of bronchiolitis.
Operational Classification
 Pneumoconioses
 Granulomatous disease
 Hypersensitivity pneumonitis
 Diffuse interstitial fibrosis
 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (= “usual interstitial
pneumonia”)
 Giant cell interstitital pneumonia (“GIP”)
 Other interstitial pneumonias
How is it diagnosed?
 Usually, obvious because patient belongs to a high-risk
group
 Demographics, family history (some IPF)
 Occupational history
 Exceptions: sarcoid, IPF
 Chest film – most often
 Restrictive pattern on PFTs
 Reduced FVC, preserved FEV1, decreased RV
 This is a late change, however.
 Biopsy – normally to be avoided!
Clinical Evaluation - History
 History of present illness
 Useful to rule out nonoccupational ILD
 Consider drug reactions, cancer, inflammatory bowel
dz, rheumatologic/autoimmune/collagen vascular dz
 Time course may distinguish eosinophilic pneumonias,
drug reactions, other diseases
 Not very useful for OILD
 Occupational history - essential
Clinical Evaluation –
Symptoms and Signs
 Nonspecific
 SOB is disproportionate to PFTs!
 Cough
 Clubbing: suggests asbestosis, pigeon breeders’ HP,
cancer
 Chest film
 PFTs: obstructive early → restrictive late
Chest film
 Plain film and
digitized images
 B reader program
 Important features:
 Parenchyma (upper)
 Pleura
 Hilum
 Parenchyma (lower)
 Superimposition
Pulmonary Function Testing and
Cardiopulmonary Evaluation
 Vital capacity
 Flow rates (e.g. FEV1)
 Lung Volumes and Diffusing
Capacity (CO)
 Bronchodilators: Pre-, Post-Shift
 Bronchoprovocation Testing
 Methacholine Testing
 Specific Agents
 Metabolic Treadmill
 Oxygen Consumption
 Anaerobic Threshold
Process leading to interstitial diseases
may cause:
• Airway irritation
• Mild obstructive defect
• Acute symptoms (cough)
• Extrathoracic disease
Interstitial Lung Disease itself causes:
• Restrictive defect
• Cough and SOB
• Pulmonary hypertension
• Shunting and V/Q mismatch
• Abnormal CO diffusing cap
• Desaturation with exercise
• Clubbing (uncommon)
Restrictive Patterns
Causes
 Extrathoracic
 Obesity
 Pregnancy
 Chest wall deformity
 Clothing or external device
(e.g. corset, cuirass)
 Intrathoracic
 Pneumonectomy
 Pleural thickening
 Interstitial Fibrosis
Indicators
 Restrictive Defects are
usually identified by
reduced Forced Vital
Capacity (FVC) during
spirometry
 However, FVC is effort
dependent
 More conclusively measured
by Total Lung Capacity
(TLC)
Usually in medicine, diagnosis is
primarily for treatment. Not here.
 Identification
 Diagnosis
 Causation
 Functional evaluation
 Treatment
 Prognosis
 sentinel event
monitoring
 causation
 apportionment
 causal circumstances
 current impairment
 future impairment
 fitness to work
Challenges
 Occupational v. nonoccupational
 Identifying the responsible agent in a case of
mixed-dust pneumoconiosis or hypersensitivity
pneumonitis or when the history is unclear
 Ruling IPF in (it can’t be easily ruled out)
 Differentiating between sarcoidosis and beryllium
disease
Approach to Evaluation
 Evidence of structural lesion consistent with the
interstitial process (e.g. asbestosis)
 In practice, evidence of a structural lesion is usually
demonstrated by chest film with or without CT
 Evidence of causation by an agent
 Evidence of causation by a particular agent may be
more difficult but is usually satisfied by the
occupational history
 Exclusion of alternative diagnoses
 may require additional clinical tests and even biopsy
ILD depends more on structural
features than functional assessment.
 Anatomical changes
 Histological changes
 Malignant potential
 Mechanical
interference with function
 Markers of exposure
 Markers of effect
 Markers of outcome
It’s the other way around with
airways disease.
However, causes of ILD may also
cause some airways dysfunction.
Operational Classification
 Pneumoconioses
 Granulomatous disease
 Hypersensitivity pneumonitis
 Diffuse interstitial fibrosis
 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (= “usual interstitial
pneumonia”)
 Giant cell interstitital pneumonia (“GIP”)
 Other interstitial pneumonias
How Do You Know It is a
Pneumoconiosis?
 Occupational history of exposure to a mineral or
metal dust
 Organic dust pneumoconioses exist but are rare
 GIP is associated with exposure to “hard metal” (esp.
W content) but is rare
 Compatible clinical and laboratory findings
 Diagnosis is primarily by chest film
 No alternative diagnosis likely
 This does not mean that it is a diagnosis of exclusion!
 Pneumoconiosis is a diagnosis of context!
Which Common Pneumoconiosis Is It?
 Occupational history
 Silica
 Asbestosis
 Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis
 Chest film
 Rounded opacities and cardinal features of silicosis
 Irregular opacities and cardinal features of asbestosis
 Pathology
 biopsy rarely indicated
 asbestos bodies useful for identifying asbestosis
Silicosis
 Silicosis
 Simple
 Chronic nodular silicosis
 Accelerated silicosis
 Acute silicosis
 Silicotuberculosis
 Associated conditions
 Autoimmune disorders
 esp. systemic sclerosis
 Nephritis
 Lung cancer
Asbestos-Related Disorders
 Asbestosis
 Pleural plaques
 Rounded atelectasis
 Chronic obstructive
airways disease
 Cancer
 Lung cancer
 Mesothelioma
 Larynx, colon, other
If any occupational physician in this room
cannot recognize this as advanced
asbestosis, please recognize that you are
in trouble!
Rounded Atelectasis
Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis
Which “Modern” Pneumoconiosis Is It?
 Occupational history
 Hard metal, tungsten-cobalt (W, Co) steel alloy
 Beryllium (granulomatous)
 Mixed dust
 Chest film
 Pathology may be required to identify GIP, or in
evaluation of suspected sarcoidosis
 Hard metal disease may be associated with cobalt-
induced bronchoreactivity
Biopsy
 May be required where there is a diagnostic dilemma:
 IPF v. sarcoid v. asbestos, silicosis (rarely and may carry risk)
 Diffuse ILDs
 Not acceptable just for medicolegal purposes
 Histology
 Pattern of fibrosis may suggest IPF
 Silicotic nodules, coal dust macules
 Asbestosis, asbestos bodies (not fibers), silica particles
 EDXA to identify composition of particles: may be important
in mixed dust or unknown pneumoconiosis
Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis
 Typical presentation of
farmer’s lung
 ≠ “silo-fillers’ disease”
 Infiltrate → fibrosis
 Cytokine-mediated
disease
 Provoked by persistent
antigen
 Often preceded by
airways prodrome
Granulomatous Disease
 Sarcoidosis is the big differential diagnosis
 Eosinophilic granuloma possible but not without eos
 Miliary TB possible but would be clinically obvious
 Hypersensitivity pneumonitis causes lung granulomas
 Beryllium identified by occupational history
 Zirconium can also cause isolated granulomata
 Confirmation by Be lymphocyte proliferation test (available
at National Jewish Hospital)
 Not a screening test
Which HP Could It Be?
 Occupational history of exposure to high MW,
persistent antigen
 Agricultural settings, especially in wet climates  R/O
farmers’ lung
 Birds, esp. pigeons  R/O “pigeon breeders’ lung”
 HVAC or older AC system, ventilation repairs  R/O
humidifier lung (diff includes Legionella)
 Rehabilitation of old buildings
 Serum antibody: “HP Panel”
Farmers’ lung
HP Panel
 Useful in presumptive, “classical” cases
 Range of specific antibody determinations limited
 Labs often offer secondary panels for less common antigen.
 These panels have been “abused” in fishing expeditions without good
indications.
HP Panel CPT
Micropolyspora faeni IgG
Thermoactinomyces vulgaris IgG
Aspergillus fumigatusIgG 86606
Penicillium Chrysogenum/notatum IgG
Alternaria tenuis/alternata IgG
Tricoderma viride IgG
Aureobasidium pullulans IgG
Phoma betae IgG
Related Tests & Panels:
Bird Fancier’s Precipitin Panel I
Bird & Mold Precipitin Panel II
Bird Fancier’s Profile Panel III
Other protein antigens & haptens
The historically common
hypersensitivity pneumonitides were:
• Farmer’s lung
• Pigeon breeders’s lung
• Humidifier lung
Which “Modern” HP Could It Be?
 Occupational history of exposure
to low MW antigen
 Isocyanate
 Trimellitic anhydride
 Pyrethrum powder (pesticide)
 Harder to diagnose
 Requires high index of suspicion
 Compatible history of exposure
 No HP panel available or practical
TDI-induced HP
Diffuse Interstitial Disease
 Giant cell interstitial
pneumonia
 Most often seen in grinding,
toolmaking with hard metal
 Uncommon
 Deep lung injury with
honeycombing
 Catastrophic event, so history
is known
 Bronchiolitis obliterans
 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (=
UIP)
 Resembles asbestosis,
pathologically distinct
 Sporadic (older) or hereditary
(younger) forms
 Elevated cancer risk
 Generally requires biopsy
 Many other interstitial
pneumonias (nomenclature issues)
 “Other” – many but individually
uncommon!
Occupational Nonoccupational
Differential Diagnosis of Diffuse ILDs
 Infection
 AIDS
 Mycoplasma
 Mycobacteria
 Legionella (humidifier lung)
 Psittacosis (pigeon breeders’
lung)
 Cryptococcosis (bird source)
 Drug reaction
 Autoimmune, rheumatological,
collagen-vascular disorders
 Post-radiation (therapeutic)
 Graft v. host
 Paraquat toxicity (suicide)
 Storage diseases
 Gaucher’s disease
 Amyloidosis
 Tuberous sclerosis
 Infection
 Whipple’s disease
 Lymphangiitic spread of cancer
(rare in this presentation)
Not Rare but Uncommon Rare
Principles of Management
 When an OILD is suspected:
 Diagnosis first
 Document level of impairment, track
 Treat according to condition
 Protection at workplace to prevent progression
 Pneumoconioses: removal not indicated if <OEL
 Be disease: removal from exposure required
 HP: removal or effective protection essential
 Otherwise, symptomatic treatment once fibrosis is
established
Essential Questions
 What is the nature of the process?
 What exposure in the worker’s employment
history may have been responsible?
 What permanent level of impairment can be
predicted?
 What can be done to control or limit the
disease process?
 Are other people in the workplace likely to
be affected, now or in the future?
Causation
 Specific, responsible
exposure
 Work relationship
 Circumstances of
exposure
 Possible interactions
 Interpretation:
 underlying cause
 proximate cause
 aggravation
 Cannot/should not use
epidemiological principles
for the individual case:
 Patients ≠ populations
 Hill criteria do not apply.
 Epi inferences are post hoc,
single cases are Bayesian.
 Standard of certainty is not
the same.
 WC Acts are clear.
Social function
 sentinel event
monitoring
 Causation/causality
 apportionment
 causal circumstances
 current impairment
 future impairment
 fitness to work
 Workers’
compensation
 Occupational health
regulation
 Employer responsibility
 (Public health)
 (Human rights)
Specific Functions Institutions
?
Social dimension: why accurate
diagnosis, causality is important.
 Equity
 Fairness (Justice)
 Sufficiency
 Transparency
 Standardization
 Consistency
 Predictability
 Reliability
 Rapidity
 Validity
Values Means

Interstitial lung disease

  • 1.
    INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE Tee L.Guidotti, MD, MPH, DABT Medical Advisory Services OEMAC 2010
  • 2.
    Benchmarks  ACOEM PracticeGuidelines  Authoritative guidance, updated, evidence-based  Lung Disease Guidelines in progress  Occupational Interstitial Lung Disease  Airways Disorders  ATS 2004 Revised Criteria for the Diagnosis of Non- Malignant Asbestos-Related Disease  This presentation  A general approach to ILD  OILD  Specific ILDs, esp. pneumoconioses  Implications
  • 3.
    Medical Evaluation ofOccupational Lung Diseases - Modalities Primarily diagnostic  Chest film, CT  Spirometry, DLCO  Blood gases  Methacholine challenge  Biopsy (Ca, IPF, granulomatous disease) Primarily occupational  Occupational history  Impairment evaluation  Provocative testing (rare)  Serology (for HP)  Biopsy (avoid)  Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
  • 4.
    What is theinterstitium?  Fabric of connective tissue that supports its many structures  Expands and contracts with ventilation  Surrounds the air spaces, brings blood in close proximity to air with separation but minimal impedance to diffusion  Serves as a conduit and fluid channel for lymphatic drainage and the migration of immune cells  Collects and sequesters a fraction of insoluble particles that deposit in the lung
  • 5.
    Interstitium and AlveolarWall Collagen bundles Fibroblasts Air space rbc
  • 6.
    What is interstitialdisease?  Acute  Edema, per se or a stage on the way to alveolar edema  Infection (e.g. mycoplasma)  Inflammation  Chronic  Fibrosis, end stage of inflammation  Often involves some degree of bronchiolitis.
  • 7.
    Operational Classification  Pneumoconioses Granulomatous disease  Hypersensitivity pneumonitis  Diffuse interstitial fibrosis  Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (= “usual interstitial pneumonia”)  Giant cell interstitital pneumonia (“GIP”)  Other interstitial pneumonias
  • 8.
    How is itdiagnosed?  Usually, obvious because patient belongs to a high-risk group  Demographics, family history (some IPF)  Occupational history  Exceptions: sarcoid, IPF  Chest film – most often  Restrictive pattern on PFTs  Reduced FVC, preserved FEV1, decreased RV  This is a late change, however.  Biopsy – normally to be avoided!
  • 9.
    Clinical Evaluation -History  History of present illness  Useful to rule out nonoccupational ILD  Consider drug reactions, cancer, inflammatory bowel dz, rheumatologic/autoimmune/collagen vascular dz  Time course may distinguish eosinophilic pneumonias, drug reactions, other diseases  Not very useful for OILD  Occupational history - essential
  • 10.
    Clinical Evaluation – Symptomsand Signs  Nonspecific  SOB is disproportionate to PFTs!  Cough  Clubbing: suggests asbestosis, pigeon breeders’ HP, cancer  Chest film  PFTs: obstructive early → restrictive late
  • 11.
    Chest film  Plainfilm and digitized images  B reader program  Important features:  Parenchyma (upper)  Pleura  Hilum  Parenchyma (lower)  Superimposition
  • 12.
    Pulmonary Function Testingand Cardiopulmonary Evaluation  Vital capacity  Flow rates (e.g. FEV1)  Lung Volumes and Diffusing Capacity (CO)  Bronchodilators: Pre-, Post-Shift  Bronchoprovocation Testing  Methacholine Testing  Specific Agents  Metabolic Treadmill  Oxygen Consumption  Anaerobic Threshold Process leading to interstitial diseases may cause: • Airway irritation • Mild obstructive defect • Acute symptoms (cough) • Extrathoracic disease Interstitial Lung Disease itself causes: • Restrictive defect • Cough and SOB • Pulmonary hypertension • Shunting and V/Q mismatch • Abnormal CO diffusing cap • Desaturation with exercise • Clubbing (uncommon)
  • 13.
    Restrictive Patterns Causes  Extrathoracic Obesity  Pregnancy  Chest wall deformity  Clothing or external device (e.g. corset, cuirass)  Intrathoracic  Pneumonectomy  Pleural thickening  Interstitial Fibrosis Indicators  Restrictive Defects are usually identified by reduced Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) during spirometry  However, FVC is effort dependent  More conclusively measured by Total Lung Capacity (TLC)
  • 14.
    Usually in medicine,diagnosis is primarily for treatment. Not here.  Identification  Diagnosis  Causation  Functional evaluation  Treatment  Prognosis  sentinel event monitoring  causation  apportionment  causal circumstances  current impairment  future impairment  fitness to work
  • 15.
    Challenges  Occupational v.nonoccupational  Identifying the responsible agent in a case of mixed-dust pneumoconiosis or hypersensitivity pneumonitis or when the history is unclear  Ruling IPF in (it can’t be easily ruled out)  Differentiating between sarcoidosis and beryllium disease
  • 16.
    Approach to Evaluation Evidence of structural lesion consistent with the interstitial process (e.g. asbestosis)  In practice, evidence of a structural lesion is usually demonstrated by chest film with or without CT  Evidence of causation by an agent  Evidence of causation by a particular agent may be more difficult but is usually satisfied by the occupational history  Exclusion of alternative diagnoses  may require additional clinical tests and even biopsy
  • 17.
    ILD depends moreon structural features than functional assessment.  Anatomical changes  Histological changes  Malignant potential  Mechanical interference with function  Markers of exposure  Markers of effect  Markers of outcome It’s the other way around with airways disease. However, causes of ILD may also cause some airways dysfunction.
  • 18.
    Operational Classification  Pneumoconioses Granulomatous disease  Hypersensitivity pneumonitis  Diffuse interstitial fibrosis  Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (= “usual interstitial pneumonia”)  Giant cell interstitital pneumonia (“GIP”)  Other interstitial pneumonias
  • 19.
    How Do YouKnow It is a Pneumoconiosis?  Occupational history of exposure to a mineral or metal dust  Organic dust pneumoconioses exist but are rare  GIP is associated with exposure to “hard metal” (esp. W content) but is rare  Compatible clinical and laboratory findings  Diagnosis is primarily by chest film  No alternative diagnosis likely  This does not mean that it is a diagnosis of exclusion!  Pneumoconiosis is a diagnosis of context!
  • 20.
    Which Common PneumoconiosisIs It?  Occupational history  Silica  Asbestosis  Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis  Chest film  Rounded opacities and cardinal features of silicosis  Irregular opacities and cardinal features of asbestosis  Pathology  biopsy rarely indicated  asbestos bodies useful for identifying asbestosis
  • 21.
    Silicosis  Silicosis  Simple Chronic nodular silicosis  Accelerated silicosis  Acute silicosis  Silicotuberculosis  Associated conditions  Autoimmune disorders  esp. systemic sclerosis  Nephritis  Lung cancer
  • 22.
    Asbestos-Related Disorders  Asbestosis Pleural plaques  Rounded atelectasis  Chronic obstructive airways disease  Cancer  Lung cancer  Mesothelioma  Larynx, colon, other If any occupational physician in this room cannot recognize this as advanced asbestosis, please recognize that you are in trouble!
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    Which “Modern” PneumoconiosisIs It?  Occupational history  Hard metal, tungsten-cobalt (W, Co) steel alloy  Beryllium (granulomatous)  Mixed dust  Chest film  Pathology may be required to identify GIP, or in evaluation of suspected sarcoidosis  Hard metal disease may be associated with cobalt- induced bronchoreactivity
  • 26.
    Biopsy  May berequired where there is a diagnostic dilemma:  IPF v. sarcoid v. asbestos, silicosis (rarely and may carry risk)  Diffuse ILDs  Not acceptable just for medicolegal purposes  Histology  Pattern of fibrosis may suggest IPF  Silicotic nodules, coal dust macules  Asbestosis, asbestos bodies (not fibers), silica particles  EDXA to identify composition of particles: may be important in mixed dust or unknown pneumoconiosis
  • 27.
    Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis  Typicalpresentation of farmer’s lung  ≠ “silo-fillers’ disease”  Infiltrate → fibrosis  Cytokine-mediated disease  Provoked by persistent antigen  Often preceded by airways prodrome
  • 28.
    Granulomatous Disease  Sarcoidosisis the big differential diagnosis  Eosinophilic granuloma possible but not without eos  Miliary TB possible but would be clinically obvious  Hypersensitivity pneumonitis causes lung granulomas  Beryllium identified by occupational history  Zirconium can also cause isolated granulomata  Confirmation by Be lymphocyte proliferation test (available at National Jewish Hospital)  Not a screening test
  • 29.
    Which HP CouldIt Be?  Occupational history of exposure to high MW, persistent antigen  Agricultural settings, especially in wet climates  R/O farmers’ lung  Birds, esp. pigeons  R/O “pigeon breeders’ lung”  HVAC or older AC system, ventilation repairs  R/O humidifier lung (diff includes Legionella)  Rehabilitation of old buildings  Serum antibody: “HP Panel” Farmers’ lung
  • 30.
    HP Panel  Usefulin presumptive, “classical” cases  Range of specific antibody determinations limited  Labs often offer secondary panels for less common antigen.  These panels have been “abused” in fishing expeditions without good indications. HP Panel CPT Micropolyspora faeni IgG Thermoactinomyces vulgaris IgG Aspergillus fumigatusIgG 86606 Penicillium Chrysogenum/notatum IgG Alternaria tenuis/alternata IgG Tricoderma viride IgG Aureobasidium pullulans IgG Phoma betae IgG Related Tests & Panels: Bird Fancier’s Precipitin Panel I Bird & Mold Precipitin Panel II Bird Fancier’s Profile Panel III Other protein antigens & haptens The historically common hypersensitivity pneumonitides were: • Farmer’s lung • Pigeon breeders’s lung • Humidifier lung
  • 31.
    Which “Modern” HPCould It Be?  Occupational history of exposure to low MW antigen  Isocyanate  Trimellitic anhydride  Pyrethrum powder (pesticide)  Harder to diagnose  Requires high index of suspicion  Compatible history of exposure  No HP panel available or practical TDI-induced HP
  • 32.
    Diffuse Interstitial Disease Giant cell interstitial pneumonia  Most often seen in grinding, toolmaking with hard metal  Uncommon  Deep lung injury with honeycombing  Catastrophic event, so history is known  Bronchiolitis obliterans  Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (= UIP)  Resembles asbestosis, pathologically distinct  Sporadic (older) or hereditary (younger) forms  Elevated cancer risk  Generally requires biopsy  Many other interstitial pneumonias (nomenclature issues)  “Other” – many but individually uncommon! Occupational Nonoccupational
  • 33.
    Differential Diagnosis ofDiffuse ILDs  Infection  AIDS  Mycoplasma  Mycobacteria  Legionella (humidifier lung)  Psittacosis (pigeon breeders’ lung)  Cryptococcosis (bird source)  Drug reaction  Autoimmune, rheumatological, collagen-vascular disorders  Post-radiation (therapeutic)  Graft v. host  Paraquat toxicity (suicide)  Storage diseases  Gaucher’s disease  Amyloidosis  Tuberous sclerosis  Infection  Whipple’s disease  Lymphangiitic spread of cancer (rare in this presentation) Not Rare but Uncommon Rare
  • 34.
    Principles of Management When an OILD is suspected:  Diagnosis first  Document level of impairment, track  Treat according to condition  Protection at workplace to prevent progression  Pneumoconioses: removal not indicated if <OEL  Be disease: removal from exposure required  HP: removal or effective protection essential  Otherwise, symptomatic treatment once fibrosis is established
  • 35.
    Essential Questions  Whatis the nature of the process?  What exposure in the worker’s employment history may have been responsible?  What permanent level of impairment can be predicted?  What can be done to control or limit the disease process?  Are other people in the workplace likely to be affected, now or in the future?
  • 36.
    Causation  Specific, responsible exposure Work relationship  Circumstances of exposure  Possible interactions  Interpretation:  underlying cause  proximate cause  aggravation  Cannot/should not use epidemiological principles for the individual case:  Patients ≠ populations  Hill criteria do not apply.  Epi inferences are post hoc, single cases are Bayesian.  Standard of certainty is not the same.  WC Acts are clear.
  • 37.
    Social function  sentinelevent monitoring  Causation/causality  apportionment  causal circumstances  current impairment  future impairment  fitness to work  Workers’ compensation  Occupational health regulation  Employer responsibility  (Public health)  (Human rights) Specific Functions Institutions ?
  • 38.
    Social dimension: whyaccurate diagnosis, causality is important.  Equity  Fairness (Justice)  Sufficiency  Transparency  Standardization  Consistency  Predictability  Reliability  Rapidity  Validity Values Means