The document discusses the definition and components of social entrepreneurship. It defines social entrepreneurship as creating social and/or ecological value in a sustainable way. Successful social entrepreneurship requires generating financial surplus to ensure long-term commitment. It provides examples of social enterprises like Baisikeli that provide bicycles to improve access to opportunities, Moomsteatern theater group for people with disabilities, and Specialisterne that hires people with autism for software testing and programming jobs. The challenges for social entrepreneurship are developing support structures and resisting being seen as just "nice people doing good" rather than agents of change.
Introduces Fredrik Björk and defines entrepreneurship as value creation by resource exploitation. Quotes from Schumpeter and Drucker emphasize the role of entrepreneurs in driving change.
Explains social entrepreneurship as creating social and ecological value, emphasizing the need for financial sustainability to ensure long-term success.
Highlights the failure of public and business sectors to address social challenges, proposing social entrepreneurship as a complementary solution involving cross-sector collaboration.
Discusses the components of social entrepreneurship, focusing on innovation, opportunities, and collaborative approaches, with an emphasis on social innovations challenging societal norms.
Explores how social entrepreneurship addresses unmet needs through various organizational forms including foundations and cooperatives, underlining the importance of control and resource mix.
Showcases examples like Baisikeli, Moomsteatern, Apokalyps Labotek, and Specialisterne, illustrating diverse approaches to social entrepreneurship addressing mobility, arts, sustainability, and employment.
Addresses the future challenges faced by social entrepreneurs, emphasizing the need for support structures and positioning them as change agents to avoid being seen merely as 'nice people'.
Entrepreneurs The functionof entrepreneurs is to reform or revolutionize the patterns of production… By exploiting an invention or… an untried technological possibility… Joseph Schumpeter The entrepreneur always searches for change, responds to it, and exploits it as an opportunity. Peter Drucker
4.
And Social Entrepreneurship?Creating social and/or ecological value Social entrepreneurship is not a new phenomenon Individuals and groups have been addressing social and ecological issues for centuries
5.
6.
Creating value Creatingsocial and/or ecological value is the success factor in social entrepreneurship What about the financial return? If there is no surplus, it will be a short-lived organization…. So – the organization has to have a sustainable flow of resources Because – to create social and ecological values you need long-term commitment
7.
Why social entrepreneurship?The public sector and the business sector have obviously been unable to handle the social and ecological challenges that communities all over the world are facing Social entrepreneurship should be seen as a complement
Social Entrepreneurship Socialentrepreneurship implies challenging sector boundaries – and cross-sector collaboration NGOs with business approaches Social purpose business ventures Public sector and civil society partnerships Cross-sector projects
10.
Components of socialentrepreneurship Entrepreneurs Innovations Oppurtunities/needs Organizations
11.
The social entrepreneursThe focus have often been on the lone, ’heroic’ entrepreneur But there are also examples of collaborative start-ups in social entrepreneurship Citizens, users, visionaries, neighbours, clients and patients – or just a couple of friends – become entrepreneurs!
12.
The social innovationsNew ways of addressing social and/or ecological challenges Often challenge existing welfare systems or notions of how society should be structured
13.
Oppurtunities and needsSocial entrepreneurship is in general more driven by the ambition to satisfy pressing needs that business or the public are unable (or not interested) to meet
14.
Organizations Associations, foundations,cooperatives, open networks … No form of organization is disqualified Control and ownership are crucial questions (not least in collaborative ventures) Intrapreneurship is not uncommon Resources are often a mix of financial and social capital
15.
Baisikeli (Copenhagen) EXAMPLES ” When people in poverty become more mobile, they get an opportunity to create a better life - a life with access to healthcare, education and higher earnings. Baisikeli is a social enterprise in Denmark that manufactures, sells, repairs and rents bicycles for both residential and business, in order to fund more and larger African projects and transfer of Danish expertise.”
16.
Moomsteatern (Malmö) EXAMPLES ” The idea in 1987 was to start a theater group for people with intellectual disabilities, a theater with only artistic goals, a theater that made theater for the audience… We've done comedy, satire, musical theater, children's theater and revue. We have toured locally and around the world, lectured, worked with ‘statistically normal’ actors… But we do not stop. It is part of the theater's nerve to never stop developing. There is always something more that can be done.”
17.
Apokalyps Labotek (Malmö) EXAMPLES ” The work of Apokalyps Labotek is often related to issues concerning consumption, production and strategic development. The aim is to generate more knowledge and discussion in combination with fabrication and production of sustainable alternatives. In short, we think, know, do and make. Self-commissioned projects run parallel with collaborations with companies, institutions and people.”
18.
Specialisterne (Denmark) EXAMPLES ” The majority of the employees in Specialisterne have a diagnosis on the autism spectrum, and work as consultants on tasks such as software testing, programming and data-entry for the corporate sector. At Specialisterne, people with autism work in an environment where they are presented with the best possible opportunities to reach their potential. They don’t have to learn to adapt to the usual working-environment norms, such as being a good team player, being empathetic, handling stress well and showing flexibility… Putting it simply; at Specialisterne, not fitting in is a good thing. The traits that usually exclude people with autism from the labour market are the very traits that make them valuable employees.”
19.
Future challenges Needto develop support strucutures – local, national, international Resist being pictured as ’nice people doing good’ – then social entrepreneurship becomes irrelevant. Social entrepreneurs are change agents!
Editor's Notes
#7 These are the most important questions to answer for researchers in social entrepreneurship