INTRODUCTION TO 
SUBJECT 
CATALOGUING
INTRODUCTION 
WHY SUBJECT CATALOGUING? 
 The process of seeking and retrieving 
information can be frustrating 
 Information retrieval systems/tools are 
more concerned with the subject approach 
 The library is of little value if it is unable 
to retrieve the right documents as and 
when they are required (Brown, 1982).
SUBJECT CATALOGUING 
 An intellectual task which deals with; the conceptual analysis 
of an item: what is it about? What is its form/genre/format? 
And translating that analysis into a particular subject heading 
system (Taylor, 1999). In subject cataloguing there are different 
indexing languages: 
 Natural Language 
 Free Language 
 Controlled Language: there are two types of this standard list: 
Alphabetical controlled 
 Classification scheme (Aina, 2004).
THE PROCESS OF SUBJECT 
CATALOGUING 
a)Conceptual analysis 
o Examine the information package: 
Title and subtitle 
Abstract or summary 
Table of contents 
Reference sources 
Introduction or preface(Broughton, 2012)
CONT…… 
o Types of concepts to identify: 
Time periods 
Title of works 
Topics 
Names of persons, corporate bodies 
Geographic areas 
o Consider the level/degree of exhaustibility: depth 
indexing and summarization(Brown, 1982) 
a) Translation of concepts into index terms
SUBJECT HEADING 
LISTS
Sears List of Subject Headings 
Satija (2007) describes Sears list as a tool 
for assigning standardized subject headings 
to all types of documents in a general small 
library having up to 20,000 titles in all 
subjects. Has been in existence for more 
than 8 decades i.e. since 1923, published by 
Minnie Earl Sears. Now it is in its 21st 
edition.
PRINCIPLES OF THE SEARS LIST 
(Satija, 2007) 
 Specific entry: 
e.g. Rose should be entered under “Roses” not 
“Flowers” 
 Direct entry: 
e.g. Rose is entered as Roses and not Flowers-Rose. 
 Common Usage: 
e.g. “Birds” instead of “Ornithology” 
 Uniformity: 
e.g. scope, meaning and spellings
TYPES OF SEARS SUBJECT HEADINGS 
a. Preferred headings: 
 printed in bold 
 Under the preferred heading is the DDC class number, scope/definitional 
note, instruction for further subdivision and the relationships if any e.g. 
Dairying (May subdiv. geog.) 636.2; 637 
b. Non preferred headings: 
 Written in light font 
 Preceded by the word “USE” e.g. Dairy farming Use Dairying 
c. Subdivisions: 
Types of subdivisions 
 Topical: Birds—Eggs 
 Bibliographical: Sindhi language – Dictionaries 
 Geographical: Trees – India 
 Chronological: Botswana -- History—1857-1960 (Satija, 2007)
Library of Congress Subject Headings 
(LCSH) 
 Accumulation of subject headings that were established by 
the Library of Congress as their subject catalogue. 
 Since 1988, in its 11th edition- other libraries have been 
contributing subject headings to LCSH (Taylor, 1999) 
 What is it: 
 A classifying and search tool- access point to bibliographic 
record. 
 Tool for subject indexing 
 A standard for subject analysis
Evaluation of LCSH 
QUESTION? 
Do librarians understand LCSH? 
 Syntax 
 Bias e.g. American spellings, culture-ethnic 
groups 
Applicability in Africa 
How many libraries are using it? – DDC!
Principles of LCSH (Chan, 2005) 
 Literary warrant: the number and specificity of subject 
headings are determined by the nature and subject 
scope of the LC collection. 
 Specific entry 
 Unique entry e.g. Homographs 
 Dynamism 
 Uniform heading e.g. synonyms, spellings, English & 
foreign terms, Scientific &popular terms, obsolete & 
current terms. 
 Pre-coordination and Post-coordination 
 Consistency
THESAURI 
 Aitchison & Gilchrist (1987) describes a thesaurus as a vocabulary of 
controlled indexing language, organized so that relationships can be 
clearly depicted and concepts are standardized to aid with consistency 
in information retrieval systems. The thesaurus have : 
 Descriptors- generally single terms but they could also be multi-terms, 
compound phrases, names of persons, bodies and places. Each 
descriptor should not be ambiguous. 
 Non descriptors- terms that cannot be used as search terms but 
facilitates with broader searches. 
 Hierarchical relationships e.g. “BT” and “NT” 
 Preferential relationships e.g. “USE” and “UF” 
 Affinitive relationships e.g. “RT” (Aina, 2004)
THESAURUS CONSTRUCTION 
 Definition of the subject field: establish the depth of the subject and 
type of literature. 
 Selection of the thesaurus characteristics and layout: 
 Presentation i.e. graphical or alphabetical 
 Type of language to be used i.e. natural, controlled or a hybrid 
 Features e.g. specificity, compound terms 
 Notification of intent 
 Selection of terms 
 Compilers’ experience and knowledge 
 Author’s literature and terminological sources in standardized form 
 Terminology in users profiles
CONT……. 
 Recording of terms: 
 Use the term record form. Information about the term include : 
Source of the term 
Synonyms 
Definitions 
Hierarchies and/ relationships 
 Checking with experts and editing 
 Testing and production for publication: 
 At least 500-1000 documents should be used for testing 
 The testing may reveal gaps in the coverage of the subject. 
 Deposit with the relevant institution
CONCLUSION 
 Differences between the thesaurus and a list of subject headings. 
 Thesauri = indexing communities while subject heading lists = 
library communities. 
 Thesauri = narrow in scope (terms from one specific subject 
area) while subject heading lists = broader (covers entire scope 
of knowledge). 
 Thesauri = multilingual while SHLs are not 
 Thesauri use single terms and bound terms representing single 
concepts unlike subject heading lists which use phrases and pre-coordinated 
terms in addition to single terms (Taylor, 1999) 
 Relationships in a thesaurus are more extensive than the subject 
heading list.
REFERENCES 
Aina, L. O. (2004). Library and Information Science Text for Africa. Gaborone: University of 
Botswana. 
Aitchison, J., & Gilchrist, A. (1987). Thesaurus construction: A practical manual (2 ed.). London: 
Aslib. 
Broughton, V. (2012). Essential Library of Congress Subject Headings. London: Facet Publishing. 
Brown, A. G. (1982). An Introduction to subject indexing (2 ed.). London: Clive Bingley. 
Chan, L. M. (2005). Library of Congress Subject Headings: Principles and Application (4 ed.). 
London: Libraries Unlimited. 
Satija, M. P. (2007). Sears List of Subject Headings: An introduction to the Nineteenth Edition. 
Amritsar: Guru Nanak Dev University. 
Sears, M. E. (1977). Sears List of Subject Headings (11 ed.). (B. M. Westby, Ed.) New York: The H. 
W. Wilson Company. 
Taylor, A. G. (1999). The organization of information. Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, INC.
THANK YOU 
QUESTIONS AND 
COMMENTS!!!!!! 
Created and Presented By: Liah Machara 
LIS621-University Of Botswana 
15/09/2014

Introduction to subject cataloguing

  • 1.
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION WHY SUBJECTCATALOGUING?  The process of seeking and retrieving information can be frustrating  Information retrieval systems/tools are more concerned with the subject approach  The library is of little value if it is unable to retrieve the right documents as and when they are required (Brown, 1982).
  • 3.
    SUBJECT CATALOGUING An intellectual task which deals with; the conceptual analysis of an item: what is it about? What is its form/genre/format? And translating that analysis into a particular subject heading system (Taylor, 1999). In subject cataloguing there are different indexing languages:  Natural Language  Free Language  Controlled Language: there are two types of this standard list: Alphabetical controlled  Classification scheme (Aina, 2004).
  • 4.
    THE PROCESS OFSUBJECT CATALOGUING a)Conceptual analysis o Examine the information package: Title and subtitle Abstract or summary Table of contents Reference sources Introduction or preface(Broughton, 2012)
  • 5.
    CONT…… o Typesof concepts to identify: Time periods Title of works Topics Names of persons, corporate bodies Geographic areas o Consider the level/degree of exhaustibility: depth indexing and summarization(Brown, 1982) a) Translation of concepts into index terms
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Sears List ofSubject Headings Satija (2007) describes Sears list as a tool for assigning standardized subject headings to all types of documents in a general small library having up to 20,000 titles in all subjects. Has been in existence for more than 8 decades i.e. since 1923, published by Minnie Earl Sears. Now it is in its 21st edition.
  • 8.
    PRINCIPLES OF THESEARS LIST (Satija, 2007)  Specific entry: e.g. Rose should be entered under “Roses” not “Flowers”  Direct entry: e.g. Rose is entered as Roses and not Flowers-Rose.  Common Usage: e.g. “Birds” instead of “Ornithology”  Uniformity: e.g. scope, meaning and spellings
  • 9.
    TYPES OF SEARSSUBJECT HEADINGS a. Preferred headings:  printed in bold  Under the preferred heading is the DDC class number, scope/definitional note, instruction for further subdivision and the relationships if any e.g. Dairying (May subdiv. geog.) 636.2; 637 b. Non preferred headings:  Written in light font  Preceded by the word “USE” e.g. Dairy farming Use Dairying c. Subdivisions: Types of subdivisions  Topical: Birds—Eggs  Bibliographical: Sindhi language – Dictionaries  Geographical: Trees – India  Chronological: Botswana -- History—1857-1960 (Satija, 2007)
  • 10.
    Library of CongressSubject Headings (LCSH)  Accumulation of subject headings that were established by the Library of Congress as their subject catalogue.  Since 1988, in its 11th edition- other libraries have been contributing subject headings to LCSH (Taylor, 1999)  What is it:  A classifying and search tool- access point to bibliographic record.  Tool for subject indexing  A standard for subject analysis
  • 11.
    Evaluation of LCSH QUESTION? Do librarians understand LCSH?  Syntax  Bias e.g. American spellings, culture-ethnic groups Applicability in Africa How many libraries are using it? – DDC!
  • 12.
    Principles of LCSH(Chan, 2005)  Literary warrant: the number and specificity of subject headings are determined by the nature and subject scope of the LC collection.  Specific entry  Unique entry e.g. Homographs  Dynamism  Uniform heading e.g. synonyms, spellings, English & foreign terms, Scientific &popular terms, obsolete & current terms.  Pre-coordination and Post-coordination  Consistency
  • 13.
    THESAURI  Aitchison& Gilchrist (1987) describes a thesaurus as a vocabulary of controlled indexing language, organized so that relationships can be clearly depicted and concepts are standardized to aid with consistency in information retrieval systems. The thesaurus have :  Descriptors- generally single terms but they could also be multi-terms, compound phrases, names of persons, bodies and places. Each descriptor should not be ambiguous.  Non descriptors- terms that cannot be used as search terms but facilitates with broader searches.  Hierarchical relationships e.g. “BT” and “NT”  Preferential relationships e.g. “USE” and “UF”  Affinitive relationships e.g. “RT” (Aina, 2004)
  • 14.
    THESAURUS CONSTRUCTION Definition of the subject field: establish the depth of the subject and type of literature.  Selection of the thesaurus characteristics and layout:  Presentation i.e. graphical or alphabetical  Type of language to be used i.e. natural, controlled or a hybrid  Features e.g. specificity, compound terms  Notification of intent  Selection of terms  Compilers’ experience and knowledge  Author’s literature and terminological sources in standardized form  Terminology in users profiles
  • 15.
    CONT…….  Recordingof terms:  Use the term record form. Information about the term include : Source of the term Synonyms Definitions Hierarchies and/ relationships  Checking with experts and editing  Testing and production for publication:  At least 500-1000 documents should be used for testing  The testing may reveal gaps in the coverage of the subject.  Deposit with the relevant institution
  • 16.
    CONCLUSION  Differencesbetween the thesaurus and a list of subject headings.  Thesauri = indexing communities while subject heading lists = library communities.  Thesauri = narrow in scope (terms from one specific subject area) while subject heading lists = broader (covers entire scope of knowledge).  Thesauri = multilingual while SHLs are not  Thesauri use single terms and bound terms representing single concepts unlike subject heading lists which use phrases and pre-coordinated terms in addition to single terms (Taylor, 1999)  Relationships in a thesaurus are more extensive than the subject heading list.
  • 17.
    REFERENCES Aina, L.O. (2004). Library and Information Science Text for Africa. Gaborone: University of Botswana. Aitchison, J., & Gilchrist, A. (1987). Thesaurus construction: A practical manual (2 ed.). London: Aslib. Broughton, V. (2012). Essential Library of Congress Subject Headings. London: Facet Publishing. Brown, A. G. (1982). An Introduction to subject indexing (2 ed.). London: Clive Bingley. Chan, L. M. (2005). Library of Congress Subject Headings: Principles and Application (4 ed.). London: Libraries Unlimited. Satija, M. P. (2007). Sears List of Subject Headings: An introduction to the Nineteenth Edition. Amritsar: Guru Nanak Dev University. Sears, M. E. (1977). Sears List of Subject Headings (11 ed.). (B. M. Westby, Ed.) New York: The H. W. Wilson Company. Taylor, A. G. (1999). The organization of information. Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, INC.
  • 18.
    THANK YOU QUESTIONSAND COMMENTS!!!!!! Created and Presented By: Liah Machara LIS621-University Of Botswana 15/09/2014