IoT (and M2M and WoT) From the Operators (CSP) perspective

1 Ribbon Communications Confidential and Proprietary
1
Welcome to the iTECH webinar
“IoT” | Samuel Dratwa
We will be starting soon!

IOT (and M2M and WoT)
From the Operator perspective
By Samuel Dratwa
Samuel.dratwa@gmail.com

What is M2M / IoT / WoT?
 Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communications represent technological solutions
and deployments allowing Machines, Devices or Objects to communicate with
each other, w/o any human interventions
 IoT (Internet of things) – objects that communicate, send information (sensors)
and/or receive controls
 WoT – Object that communicate
via the Web, Cloud
3

Smart Cities
5
Source: Sensing as a Service - Charith Perera , 2018

The network is for devices not for pepole
8
Sourse: Bryan Costanich, Sep 2019

Cisco / Jasper - IoT Success Stories
9

Challenges and Barriers to IoT
 Identification
 Deployment of IPv6
 Sensor energy
 Standards
 Bandwidth management
 Security
 AAA
10

Differences Between H2H and M2M
11
M2M / IoT
H2H
TOPICS
M2M outnumbers human end users by order of magnitude
There are a lot of us. But maybe not that much
compared to M2M potential
Entity #
Traffic is mainly uploaded and most of it requires small
amounts of bandwidth (video surveillance might require
more).
Most of the traffic is downloaded and requires
significant amounts of bandwidth (file, Web and
video streaming).
Data
Volume
Auto-generating power or be self-sustaining for long
periods.
We can buy a new one. We can recharge.
Battery
some applications are mainly for real-time control;
urgent/emergency action would have little tolerance.
We do have a tolerance for it even when it comes
to voice
Delay
Not so much here. Machine Communication Identity
Module (MCIM) in Universal Integrated Circuit Card (UICC)
or Trusted Environment (TRE).
Worth comes to worth. Instinct tells us or we just
know if it has been stolen.
security
Low ARPD.
Good.
Revenue
To be created/adapted, new opportunities on top of
common infrastructure.
Well defined.
Value Chain
Push/pull behavior. Might require longer dormant period,
minimize signaling on control plane.
satisfying.
Reachability

IoT connectivity
Technology
3G LTE WIFI Zigbee Wireless
Hart
LR-WPAN
(802.15.4g)
LPWA
(LORA/Sigfox, etc.)
Long Range Yes Yes No No No Limited (1.5
Km)
Yes (10s Km)
Tx Current
Consumption (3V)
500 to
1000mA
600 to
1100 mA
19 to
400 mA
34mA 28mA ~ 35mA 20-70mA
Topology P2P P2P P2P/Mesh Mesh Mesh Mesh P2P
Standby Current
Consumption (3V)
1.2 to 3.5mA 1.5 to
5.5mA
1.1 mA 0.003mA 0.008mA ~.005mA 0.005mA
Energy Harvesting No No No Possible Possible Possible Possible
Operating Life on
battery (2000mAh)
A=Active
I=Idle
2-4 hours (A)
20 days (I)
2-3 hours (A)
12 days (I)
4-8 hours (A)
50 hours (I)
60 hours (A) 8-10 years Variable 10-20 Years
Module Cost $35-$50 $40-$80 $5-$8 $6-$12 NC $3 $2-$5
Spectrum Costs Yes Yes No
(Unlicensed)
No
(Unlicensed)
No
(Unlicensed)
No
(Unlicensed)
No (Unlicensed)

Real working example (2019)
14

LTE solve most of the problems
5G solve them all (?)
 LTE in unlicensed spectrum
 LTE enchantements for Machine-Type Communications (MTC)
 Enhancements for D2D
 Indoor positioning
 RCS
And even
 Power supply over radio
15

D2D – Proximity Services (TR 22.803)
17

The Challenge of the embedded SIM
21

What can we (operators) can do
22

23
Source: Hot Telcom, IoT for Carriers, 2019

USN with related technical areas
24

IoT (and M2M and WoT) From the Operators (CSP) perspective

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to IoT (and M2M and WoT) From the Operators (CSP) perspective (20)

More from Samuel Dratwa (18)

Recently uploaded (20)

IoT (and M2M and WoT) From the Operators (CSP) perspective

Editor's Notes