Irrational node detection in multihop cellular networks using accounting center

IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 11 | Nov-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 566
IRRATIONAL NODE DETECTION IN MULTIHOP CELLULAR
NETWORKS USING ACCOUNTING CENTER
D Krishna Mohan1
, B. Lalitha2
1
Post graduate, 2
Assistant professor, Department of computer science and engineering,
JNTU Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh, India
Abstract
In multihop cellular networks mobile nodes typically transmit packets during intermediate mobile nodes for enhancing recital. Stingy
nodes typically don't collaborate that incorporates a negative result on the network fairness and recital. A fair, inexpensive and best
incentive mechanism by Selfish Node Detection (FESCIMbySND) has been projected to stimulate the mobile node’s cooperation.
Hashing operations area unit employed in order to extend the safety. Trivial Hash perform has been wont to improve end-to-end delay
and outturn. Additionally Cyclic Redundancy Check Mechanism has been used to spot the ridiculous nodes that involve themselves in
sessions with the intention of dropping the in sequence packets. Moreover, to cut back the impact at the Accounting Center a Border
node has been commend the task of propose the checks employing a digital signature.
Keywords: Border Node Mechanism, Cyclic Redundancy Check, Selfish nodes, Trivial Hash Function
----------------------------------------------------------------------***-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. INTRODUCTION
Reputation-based and incentive mechanisms are projected to
avoid stinginess attacks. For reputation-based mechanisms the
nodes sometimes monitor the transmissions of their neighbors
to create certain that the neighbors relay different nodes’ traffic,
and thus, narcissistic nodes are often known and chastised. For
incentive mechanisms, packet relay may be a service not AN
obligation. The supply and destination nodes pay credits (or
virtual currency) to the intermediate nodes for relaying their
packets. Credits will stimulate the nodes’ cooperation by
proving that it's a lot of useful for the nodes to collaborate than
behaving egotistically.
A fair and economical incentive mechanism has been projected
to stimulate the node cooperation. Hashing operations square
measure employed in the ACK packets to cut back the quantity
of public-key- cryptography operations.
Trivial Hash operate has been accustomed cut back the quantity
of public key cryptanalytic operations. Additionally it
additionally has the advantage that it will cut back the
computation value. Cyclic Redundancy Check Mechanism has
been utilized to spot the irrational nodes that involve
themselves in sessions with the intention of dropping the
information packets to launch Denial-of-Service attacks.
Moreover, reducing the overhead of the payment checks is
important for the economical implementation of the motivation
mechanism thanks to the massive variety of payment
transactions.
To change this, rather than permitting every of the intermediate
nodes to submit checks one by one for expense a Border node
has been commend the task of submitting the checks employing
a digital signature. in depth analysis and simulations
demonstrate that the projected system allows economical
knowledge transfer by police investigation irrational nodes
The network potency has been considerably impermanent by
reducing the overhead of check submission victimization
Border node mechanism. What is more Trivial Hash operate
has considerably reduced the value of computing hash
functions while not compromising the message integrity.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
A secure mechanism is bestowed [1] to stimulate finish users to
stay their devices turned on, to refrain from overloading the
network, and to avoid change of state aimed toward changing
the device into a “selfish” one. A regionally Aware name
system has been planned [2] that addresses inconsiderate
behavior by exploitation regionally out there data. an summary
of security issues [3] for mobile impromptu networks
distinctive the threats on basic mechanisms and on security
mechanisms is mentioned. A micro-payment theme has been
planned [4] for multi-hop cellular networks that encourage
collaboration in packet forwarding by lease users take pleasure
in relaying others’ packets. A protocol [5] is bestowed for
routing in impromptu networks that uses Dynamic supply
Routing. Multihop Cellular Network (MCN), for wireless
communications [6] preserves the good thing about typical
Single Hop Cellular Networks (SCN) wherever the service
infrastructure is made by fastened bases, and it conjointly

__________________________________________________________________________________________
incorporates the flexibleness of ad-hoc networks wherever
wireless transmission through mobile stations in multiple hops
is allowed. In multihop cellular networks, the mobile nodes
typically relay others’ packets [7] for enhancing the network
performance and readying. a good and economical incentive
mechanism-FESCIM has been planned to stimulate the node
cooperation. 2 techniques are planned that improve output in
Associate in Nursing Ad-hoc network [8] within the presence
of nodes that comply with forward packets however fail to try
to to thus. there's a watchdog that identifies misbehaving nodes
and there's a pathrater that helps routing protocols avoid these
nodes. A simulation study is applied [9] that identifies security
problems that square measure specific to Manet which illustrate
the results of these threats on network performance once the
DSR routing protocol is employed. A multi-party
micropayment [10] theme has been planned that enables all
parties concerned during a decision to be paid in period of time.
Multi-hop cellular networks (also known as hybrid networks)
seem to be a capable combination of the dynamics of mobile
unprepared networks and therefore the dependableness of
infrastructure wireless networks [11]. These hybrid networks
provide many blessings for users yet as operators.
A Cooperation and Accounting Strategy for Hybrid Networks
referred to as CASHnet has been projected that stimulates
cooperation among nodes by creating it a rewardable different
to stinginess. Our theme incorporates security design, that relies
on public key cryptography and uses digital signatures and
certificates. Today’s public Wireless LANs area unit restricted
to hotspots [12]. With this technology, suppliers will solely
target a tiny low audience and successively charge high costs
for his or her service to get revenue. Also, suppliers cannot
react befittingly to dynamic changes within the demand.
Therefore, a cooperation and accounting theme has been that
introduces financial rewards. CASHnet is compared with the
Nuglet theme victimization simulations below the factors of
network liveliness, overhead, and packet drop reasons yet as
income. CASHnet, uses a extremely suburbanized accounting
and security design .It permits ungenerous nodes and supports
price sharing between sender and receivers situated in
numerous sub networks. Integrated Cellular And unintended
Relaying Systems (iCAR) [13] could be a new wireless system
design supported the mixing of cellular and fashionable
unintended relaying technologies. It addresses the congestion
drawback as a result of unbalanced traffic in an exceedingly
cellular system and provides ability for heterogeneous
networks. the correct functioning of mobile unintended
networks depends on the hypothesis that every individual node
is prepared to forward packets for others [14].To address this
drawback, we tend to propose a credit-based Secure Incentive
Protocol (SIP) to stimulate cooperation among mobile nodes
with individual interests. SIP will be enforced in an
exceedingly totally distributed manner and doesn't need any
pre-deployed infrastructure. Faerie [15], a simple, cheat-proof,
credit primarily based system is projected for exciting
cooperation among ungenerous nodes in mobile unintended
networks.
3. EXISTING SYSTEM
In multihop cellular networks, the mobile nodes typically relay
alternative node’s packets for enhancing the network
performance and readying. As a primary step to the present
method in FESCIM [7], a route is about up between supply and
destination by the Route Discovery section. throughout this the
sender can send a Route Request Packet to its neighbors that
contain the destination address. The neighbors successively
append their own address to the Route Request Packet and air
it. This method continues till the Route Request Packet reaches
the destination. The destination can ensure this route by a Route
Reply Packet. the info packet being sent are encrypted by
mistreatment hashing operation. Additionally hashing method
also will scale back the quantity of public-key- science
operations. Upon receiving the Route Reply Packet, every
intermediate node relays the packet.
However, self-serving nodes typically don't work however
build use of alternative nodes for relaying the packets. Such
nodes are known and punished. Once fortunate information
transfer the co-operating nodes can submit a check to the
Accounting Center for compensation of resources. The
Accounting Center can then distribute the credits to the co-
operative nodes once verification of the checks.
4. PROPOSED SYSTEM
From the studies conducted over the years it's been clear that in
information transfer some delay still exists. Ungenerous
behavior among nodes is found to be one necessary reason for
this delay in information delivery. Numerous techniques are
adopted to scale back this ungenerous behavior and enhance
cooperation among intermediate nodes however it's been
distinguished that some wrongful conduct still exists because of
the presence of irrational nodes within the network. The
prevailing system will avoid stinginess attacks however it
cannot establish the illogical nodes that involve themselves in
sessions with the purpose of dropping the information packets.
Techniques may well be adopted to seek out such irrational
nodes.
Previously hashing operations are utilized to secure the
information being transferred over the network. However but
hashing operations conjointly create to some machine delay.
This price of computation may well be reduced exploitation
higher hashing techniques.
Moreover every of the cooperating nodes that have participated
in successful information transfer submit checks to the
Accounting Center for compensation of resources. this will end
in congestion at the Accounting Center. Steps may well be
taken to scale back this hold up.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
The planned system aims at overcoming of these draw backs.
• Reduces time delay concerned in information transfer
by distinctive irrational nodes.
• Reduces the machine price of hashing
• Reduces the hold up at the Accounting Center
4.1 CRC- Cyclic Redundancy Check
Cyclic Redundancy Check are often used for handling irrational
nodes. Every information packet to be transmitted is appended
with a check and this check is calculated at each hop of
knowledge transfer. If there's a distinction within the check
worth there's an information loss so specific node is discerned
and blocked. Such nodes are irrational nodes. This can facilitate
avoid information loss and guarantee high outturn and cut back
finish to finish delay.
4.2 Trivial Hash Function
Trivial Hash perform has been wont to scale back the price of
computing the hash perform. If the data point to be hashed is
tiny enough, one will use the data point itself because the
hashed price. the price of computing this "trivial" hash perform
is effectively zero. This hash perform is because it maps every
input to a definite hash price. Associate degree index table is
maintained that offers alternate type of the character Invalid
knowledge values could also be left indefinable within the
table, or mapped to some acceptable "null” price.
4.3 Border Node Mechanism
To modify congestion at the Accounting Center a border node
is entrusted the responsibility of check submission. All the
intermediate cooperating nodes can deliver the checks to the
current Border Node. This Border Node can then generate a
final check and secure it with a digital signature and send it to
the Accounting Center. This can guarantee less congestion at
the Accounting Center and facilitate modify the bottleneck
downside.
5. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Java Network machine (JNS) is employed for simulation
discovered. JNS may be a common network simulation tool
used for network research lab experimentation and analysis.
JNS provides network performance metrics at varied
abstraction levels like Network, sub-network, Node and an in
depth packet trace. Mistreatment JNS modeling and simulation
services area unit provided in an exceedingly kind of
networking technologies and protocols. Results obtained area
unit as shown below. Table I, II, III shows variation in turnout,
finish to finish delay and packet loss for twelve nodes severally.
Equally the graphs obtained for these variations also are shown
below in Figures two, 3, four severally.
Fig 1: Comparison of throughput
Fig 2: Comparison of delay
CONCLUSIONS
A finest and secure transmission mechanism has been projected
for Multihop Cellular Networks. Irrational nodes have been
originate out thereby increasing throughput by 9.4 % and
plummeting end to end delay by 1.6%. Extensive simulations
show that the projected mechanism achieves enhanced
transmission by reducing the packet loss by 9%.
REFERENCES
[1] X. Li, B. Seet, and P. Chong, “Multihop Cellular
Networks: Technology and Economics,”Computer
Networks,vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1825-1837, June 2008.
[2] C. Gomes and J. Galtier, “Optimal and Fair
Transmission Rate Allocation Problem in Multi-Hop
Cellular Networks,”Proc. Int’l Conf. Ad-Hoc, Mobile
and Wireless Networks,pp. 327-340, Aug. 2009.
[3] G. Shen, J. Liu, D. Wang, J. Wang, and S. Jin, “Multi-
Hop Relay for Next-Generation Wireless Access
Networks,”Bell Labs Technical J., vol. 13, no. 4, pp.
175-193, 2009.
[4] R. Schoenen, R. Halfmann, and B. Walke, “MAC
Performance of a 3GPP-LTE Multihop Cellular
Network,” Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Comm. (ICC),pp.
4819-4824, May 2008.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
[5] G. Marias, P. Georgiadis, D. Flitzanis, and K. Mandalas,
“Cooperation Enforcement Schemes for MANETs: A
Survey,” J. Wireless Comm. and Mobile Computing,vol.
6, no. 3, pp. 319-332, 2006.
[6] C. Song and Q. Zhang, “OMH-Suppressing Selfish
Behavior in Ad Hoc Networks with One More
Hop,”Mobile Networks and Applications,vol. 14, no. 2,
pp. 178-187, Feb. 2009.
[7] D. Djenouri and N. Badache, “On Eliminating Packet
Droppers in MANET: A Modular Solution,”Ad Hoc
Networks,vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1243-1258, Aug. 2009.
[8] G. Bella, G. Costantino, and S. Riccobene, “Evaluating
the Device Reputation Through Full Observation in
MANETs,”J. Information Assurance and Security,vol. 4,
no. 5, pp. 458-465, Mar. 2009.
[9] Y. Zhang, W. Lou, and Y. Fang, “A Secure Incentive
Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,”ACM Wireless
Networks,vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 569-582, Oct. 2007.
[10] A. Weyland, “Cooperation and Accounting in Multi-Hop
Cellular Networks,” PhD thesis, Univ. of Bern, Nov.
2005.
[11] A. Weyland, T. Staub, and T. Braun, “Comparison of
MotivationBased Cooperation Mechanisms for Hybrid
Wireless Networks,” J. Computer Comm.,vol. 29, pp.
2661-2670, 2006.
[12] M. Mahmoud and X. Shen, “Stimulating Cooperation in
MultiHop Wireless Networks Using Cheating Detection
System,”Proc. IEEE INFOCOM,pp. 776-784, Mar.
2010.
[13] J. Pan, L. Cai, X. Shen, and J. Mark, “Identity-Based
Secure Collaboration in Wireless Ad Hoc
Networks,”Computer Networks, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 853-
865, 2007.
[14] N. Salem, L. Buttyan, J. Hubaux, and M. Jakobsson,
“Node Cooperation in Hybrid Ad Hoc Networks,”IEEE
Trans. Mobile Computing,vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 365-376,
Apr. 2006.
[15] H. Janzadeh, K. Fayazbakhsh, M. Dehghan, and M.
Fallah, “A Secure Credit-Based Cooperation Stimulating
Mechanism for MANETs Using Hash Chains,”Future
Generation Computer Systems,vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 926-
934, Sept. 2009.
[16] Nat’l Inst. of Standards and Technology (NIST),
“Recommendation for Key Management - Part 1:
General (Revised),” Special Publication 800-57 200,
2007.
[17] W. Dai, “Crypto++ Library 5.6.0,”
http://www.cryptopp.com, 2011.
[18] N. Potlapally, S. Ravi, A. Raghunathan, and N. Jha, “A
Study of the Energy Consumption Characteristics of
Cryptographic Algorithms and Security Protocols,”
IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 128-
143, Mar./Apr. 2006.

Irrational node detection in multihop cellular networks using accounting center

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Similar to Irrational node detection in multihop cellular networks using accounting center (20)

More from eSAT Journals (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Irrational node detection in multihop cellular networks using accounting center