Benefits of Using Liquid-Solid
      Separation with Manure
        Treatment Lagoons
John P. Chastain, Ph.D., Professor and Extension Agricultural
 Engineer, School of Agricultural, Forest, and Environmental
                 Sciences, Clemson University
Jeffery Porter, Environmental Engineer, USDA-NRCS Manure
                      Management Team
        Waste to Worth Conference, Denver, Colorado
               Grand Hyatt Hotel • April 1-5, 2013
Purpose
   Define a manure treatment lagoon and how it
    is sized.

   Summarize the benefits of using liquid-solid
    separation prior to lagoon treatment.
Liquid-Solid Separation Options
1.   Separation based on particle size – screens &
     presses.
2.   Separation based on density of the manure –
     gravity & cyclones
3.   Can provide solid removal efficiencies in the
     range of 10% to 60% depending on species
     and manure solids content.
Some simple screen type separators
Some types of press separators
Combination of an in-channel flighted conveyor screen
and a small screw press to treat liquid swine manure

                           Screw Press
Liquid-solid separator that employs three
techniques: fine stationary incline screen (0.020
in), screw press, and an inclined flighted
conveyor screen (courtesy of US FARM
Systems, Tulare, CA).
Liquid-Solid Separation by Settling
Since the settled solids are slurry they can be
used to load a press if dry solids are needed.
Chemicals can be used to remove 70%
to 90% of the solids and P for most
methods of liquid-solid separation
-   Need proper dose
-   Need proper mixing
-   Need proper dilution
-   Need $$$
Benefits of Liquid-Solid Separation for
Manure Storages – not for recycle systems




          This is not a lagoon.
Benefits of Liquid-Solid Separation for
Storages
   Remove large particles to reduce energy and
    time needed for agitation and pumping
   Reduce manure storage volume by up to 20%
    if TS removal is on the order of 40%.
   Remove large particles that could cause
    clogging of pipes and nozzles.
Manure Treatment Lagoons Are Different
From Storages– best for recycle systems
Lagoon Sizing
   Lagoon Volume = (Manure Volume +
    Treatment Volume + Sludge Storage Volume)
   On top of these volumes add DEPTHS for
    Net Rain (P+R), 25 year – 24 hr storm +
    minimum of 12” of freeboard.
   These depths are required for any manure
    storage.
Typical Lagoon System
Well treated recycled lagoon water needed
for manure removal.
   High loading rates = strong recycle water for
    flush and pit-recharge buildings.
   Need well treated lagoon water to make recycle
    flush and pit-recharge buildings function
    properly.
   Maximum loading for recycle should be based on
    ASABE Standard.
Use of a mechanical separator (MS) to reduce
loading on lagoon
Enhancing solids and nutrient removal by using
chemicals slows the system down in this configuration.
Gravity settling can be used to make high-rate
mechanical separation easier – also reduces chemical
costs.
Add a settling basin or pond before the
lagoon – basins drain dry, ponds do not.
Can use chemicals to enhance removal of solids and
plant nutrients for a settling basin or pond.
Manure Storage Volume
   Will include all manure, wasted water, and
    other solids added to manure per day
    (bedding and wasted feed)
   Typically use a storage period ranging from
    180 days in warm southern climates to 365
    days in cold climates (e.g. Midwest)
   Liquid-solid separation can reduce this
    volume by 10% to 25%. Best to be
    conservative.
Treatment Volume
   Depends on VS loading rate , LR = lb
    VS/1000ft3/day.
   TV (ft3) = 1000 (lb VS/day / LR)
   Design loading rate depends on the climate.
   Larger loading rates can be used in warm
    climates than in cold climates (ANSI/ASAE
    EP403.4, ASABE, 2011)
Variation of LR With Climate
(ANSI/ASAE EP403.4, ASABE, 2011)
                            Loading Rate, lb
Location                    VS/1000ft3/day
Southern Minnesota (Cold)            3.0
Iowa                                 3.5
Kansas                               4.0
North Carolina                       4.5
South Carolina & Georgia             5.0
Central Texas                        5.5
Central Florida (Hot)                6.0
VS Removal Reduces TV, ft3 / 1000 lb of live
animal weight, Finishing Swine (5.01 lb VS/1000 lb)
Loading Rate VS Removed by Liquid-Solid Separation
lb VS/1000 ft3-d    0%     20%     40%     60%     80%
   3.0, MN         1668    1335    1001    667.3   333.7
    3.5, IA        1430    1144    858.0   572.0   286.0
   4.0, KS         1251    1001    750.8   500.5   250.3
   4.5, NC         1112    889.8   667.3   444.9   222.4
   5.0, SC         1001    800.8   600.6   400.4   200.2
   5.5, TX         910.0   728.0   546.0   364.0   182.0
   6.0, FL         834.2   667.3   500.5   333.7   166.8
VS Removal Reduces TV, ft3 / 1000 lb of live
animal weight, Dairy Cows (11.8 lb VS/1000 lb)
Loading Rate VS Removed by Liquid-Solid Separation
lb VS/1000 ft3-d   0%     20%    40%    60%     80%
   3.0, MN         3936   3149   2362   1574    787.2
    3.5, IA        3374   2699   2024   1349    674.7
   4.0, KS         2952   2362   1771   1181    590.4
   4.5, NC         2624   2099   1574   1050    524.8
   5.0, SC         2362   1889   1417   944.6   472.3
   5.5, TX         2147   1718   1288   858.8   429.4
   6.0, FL         1968   1574   1181   787.2   393.6
Sludge Storage Volume, ft3/1000lb /year
(ANSI/ASAE EP403.4, ASABE, 2011)
   Depends on TS loading rate , MTS = lb
    TS added per year.
   Sludge accumulation rates:
     Swine = 0.0219 ft3/lb TS Added
     Dairy = 0.0729 ft3/lb TS Added
Liquid-solid separation will reduce sludge build
 up in a treatment lagoon – Critical for dairy!
                            Swine         Dairy
   TS Removed By        Sludge Volume Sludge Volume
     Separator             Per Year      Per Year
          0%               52.0 ft3/AU         383.2 ft3/AU
          20%                 41.6                306.5
          40%                 31.2                229.9
          60%                 20.8                153.3
          80%                 10.4                76.63

Solids Production: Swine = 6.5 lb TS/AU/day, Dairy = 14.4lb/AU/day
Odor Reduction?
   Research has shown that most of the odor
    comes from particles that are smaller than
    0.0098” (0.25mm).
   Must have high-rate separation to greatly
    reduce odor production from liquid manure.
   However lower VS loading rates have been
    shown to reduce frequency of odor from a
    lagoon.
Effect of VS Loading Rate on Odor
Frequency (adapted from Humenik, et al. 1981)
Summary
   Liquid-solid separation can be used to
    significantly reduce treatment and sludge
    storage volumes.
   Allows use of smaller structures to save
    money.
   Allows more economical use of lower loading
    rates to improve recycle water quality.
   Can help reduce ammonia and odor
    production
Summary (2)
   Can allow use of anaerobic treatment lagoons
    in colder climates.
   Can be used to remove a portion of VS and
    Organic-N that would breakdown in the
    lagoon to yield methane, ammonia, and
    carbon dioxide.
   Reduces cost of sludge management to
    maintain lagoon function.
Agricultural Mechanization &

            Business


 School of Agricultural, Forest, and

      Environmental Sciences




           Contact:

       Christi Leard

      864.656.3250

More Related Content

PPTX
UASB reactors
PPT
Benefits of using liquid-solid separation with manure treatment lagoons
PPTX
Manage your water systems for cost control & reliability
PPTX
Technologies for Anaerobic Digestion of Flushed Swine Manure
PPT
Manure Handling Presentation
PDF
Sewage Treatment Plant Design Project
DOCX
SLAUGHTER HOUSE WASTE MANAGEMENT
UASB reactors
Benefits of using liquid-solid separation with manure treatment lagoons
Manage your water systems for cost control & reliability
Technologies for Anaerobic Digestion of Flushed Swine Manure
Manure Handling Presentation
Sewage Treatment Plant Design Project
SLAUGHTER HOUSE WASTE MANAGEMENT

Similar to John chastain benefits of using liquid-solid separation with manure treatment lagoons-wtw (20)

PPT
Dr. Steve Pohl - Swine Manure Systems and Handling Issues
PDF
Characterization_utilization_and_disposa.pdf
PPTX
dewa tering and drying in soild waste management.pptx
PPTX
solid waste wastte and minicpal waste dewa tering and drying.pptx
PPT
Sludgehandlinganddisposal
PPT
TREATMENT OF ABATTOIR EFFLUENT
PDF
Thermylis 2S - 2-stage sludge incineration process
PPT
Concept of ems
PDF
11.treatability studies of dairy wastewater by upflow anaerobic sludge blanke...
PDF
11.[43 48]treatability studies of dairy wastewater by upflow anaerobic sludge...
PPTX
Sludge handling and disposal
PPTX
Anaerobic ponds
PPTX
ព្រះរាជាណាចក្រកម្ពុជា
PPTX
120MN0550_Waste water treatment case studies..pptx
PPTX
Treatment Technologies for Ammonia in Liquid Manure: Nitrification/denitrific...
PDF
NNFCC briefing document. energy from waste the benefits of upgrading househol...
PPTX
Technical calculations for the biological treatment plant
PPTX
Municipal wastewater treatment
PPTX
Active landfill
PPTX
Design criteria for waste water treatment
Dr. Steve Pohl - Swine Manure Systems and Handling Issues
Characterization_utilization_and_disposa.pdf
dewa tering and drying in soild waste management.pptx
solid waste wastte and minicpal waste dewa tering and drying.pptx
Sludgehandlinganddisposal
TREATMENT OF ABATTOIR EFFLUENT
Thermylis 2S - 2-stage sludge incineration process
Concept of ems
11.treatability studies of dairy wastewater by upflow anaerobic sludge blanke...
11.[43 48]treatability studies of dairy wastewater by upflow anaerobic sludge...
Sludge handling and disposal
Anaerobic ponds
ព្រះរាជាណាចក្រកម្ពុជា
120MN0550_Waste water treatment case studies..pptx
Treatment Technologies for Ammonia in Liquid Manure: Nitrification/denitrific...
NNFCC briefing document. energy from waste the benefits of upgrading househol...
Technical calculations for the biological treatment plant
Municipal wastewater treatment
Active landfill
Design criteria for waste water treatment
Ad

More from LPE Learning Center (20)

PDF
Animal agriculture adaptation planning guide (climate change)
PDF
Is it weather or is it climate? What is the difference?
PDF
Why does climate change?
PDF
The current state of cap-and-trade in the U.S. and the mandatory greenhouse g...
PDF
Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in animal agriculture
PDF
Contribution of greenhouse gas emissions: animal agriculture in perspective
PDF
What Is a Water Footprint?
PDF
What Is a Land Footprint?
PPSX
Impact of aerosols on respiratory health of dairy workers and residents livin...
PPSX
Estimation of infectious risks in residential populations near a center pivot...
PPTX
User capabilities and next generation phosphorus (p) indices
PPT
Phosphorus indices what is the water quality goal
PPTX
How legacy nutrients affect farm conservation measures
PPTX
Estimation of phosphorus loss from agricultural land in the southern region o...
PPTX
Estimation of phosphorus loss from agricultural land in the heartland region ...
PPTX
Checking ambition with reality the pros and cons of different approaches to s...
PPTX
Removing phosphorus from drainage water the phosphorus removal structure
PPTX
Legacy phosphorus in calcareous soils effects of long term poultry litter app...
PPTX
Identify and synthesize methods to refine phosphorus indices from three regio...
PPTX
Modeling phosphorus runoff in the chesapeake bay region to test the phosphoru...
Animal agriculture adaptation planning guide (climate change)
Is it weather or is it climate? What is the difference?
Why does climate change?
The current state of cap-and-trade in the U.S. and the mandatory greenhouse g...
Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in animal agriculture
Contribution of greenhouse gas emissions: animal agriculture in perspective
What Is a Water Footprint?
What Is a Land Footprint?
Impact of aerosols on respiratory health of dairy workers and residents livin...
Estimation of infectious risks in residential populations near a center pivot...
User capabilities and next generation phosphorus (p) indices
Phosphorus indices what is the water quality goal
How legacy nutrients affect farm conservation measures
Estimation of phosphorus loss from agricultural land in the southern region o...
Estimation of phosphorus loss from agricultural land in the heartland region ...
Checking ambition with reality the pros and cons of different approaches to s...
Removing phosphorus from drainage water the phosphorus removal structure
Legacy phosphorus in calcareous soils effects of long term poultry litter app...
Identify and synthesize methods to refine phosphorus indices from three regio...
Modeling phosphorus runoff in the chesapeake bay region to test the phosphoru...
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Dell Pro Micro: Speed customer interactions, patient processing, and learning...
PDF
5-Ways-AI-is-Revolutionizing-Telecom-Quality-Engineering.pdf
PDF
giants, standing on the shoulders of - by Daniel Stenberg
PDF
CXOs-Are-you-still-doing-manual-DevOps-in-the-age-of-AI.pdf
PDF
“The Future of Visual AI: Efficient Multimodal Intelligence,” a Keynote Prese...
PDF
Introduction to MCP and A2A Protocols: Enabling Agent Communication
PDF
Transform-Quality-Engineering-with-AI-A-60-Day-Blueprint-for-Digital-Success.pdf
PDF
substrate PowerPoint Presentation basic one
PDF
IT-ITes Industry bjjbnkmkhkhknbmhkhmjhjkhj
PDF
Ensemble model-based arrhythmia classification with local interpretable model...
PDF
Lung cancer patients survival prediction using outlier detection and optimize...
PDF
Transform-Your-Streaming-Platform-with-AI-Driven-Quality-Engineering.pdf
PPTX
SGT Report The Beast Plan and Cyberphysical Systems of Control
PDF
Electrocardiogram sequences data analytics and classification using unsupervi...
PPTX
Internet of Everything -Basic concepts details
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week IV
PDF
Co-training pseudo-labeling for text classification with support vector machi...
PPTX
AI-driven Assurance Across Your End-to-end Network With ThousandEyes
PDF
zbrain.ai-Scope Key Metrics Configuration and Best Practices.pdf
PDF
Aug23rd - Mulesoft Community Workshop - Hyd, India.pdf
Dell Pro Micro: Speed customer interactions, patient processing, and learning...
5-Ways-AI-is-Revolutionizing-Telecom-Quality-Engineering.pdf
giants, standing on the shoulders of - by Daniel Stenberg
CXOs-Are-you-still-doing-manual-DevOps-in-the-age-of-AI.pdf
“The Future of Visual AI: Efficient Multimodal Intelligence,” a Keynote Prese...
Introduction to MCP and A2A Protocols: Enabling Agent Communication
Transform-Quality-Engineering-with-AI-A-60-Day-Blueprint-for-Digital-Success.pdf
substrate PowerPoint Presentation basic one
IT-ITes Industry bjjbnkmkhkhknbmhkhmjhjkhj
Ensemble model-based arrhythmia classification with local interpretable model...
Lung cancer patients survival prediction using outlier detection and optimize...
Transform-Your-Streaming-Platform-with-AI-Driven-Quality-Engineering.pdf
SGT Report The Beast Plan and Cyberphysical Systems of Control
Electrocardiogram sequences data analytics and classification using unsupervi...
Internet of Everything -Basic concepts details
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week IV
Co-training pseudo-labeling for text classification with support vector machi...
AI-driven Assurance Across Your End-to-end Network With ThousandEyes
zbrain.ai-Scope Key Metrics Configuration and Best Practices.pdf
Aug23rd - Mulesoft Community Workshop - Hyd, India.pdf

John chastain benefits of using liquid-solid separation with manure treatment lagoons-wtw

  • 1. Benefits of Using Liquid-Solid Separation with Manure Treatment Lagoons John P. Chastain, Ph.D., Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer, School of Agricultural, Forest, and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University Jeffery Porter, Environmental Engineer, USDA-NRCS Manure Management Team Waste to Worth Conference, Denver, Colorado Grand Hyatt Hotel • April 1-5, 2013
  • 2. Purpose  Define a manure treatment lagoon and how it is sized.  Summarize the benefits of using liquid-solid separation prior to lagoon treatment.
  • 3. Liquid-Solid Separation Options 1. Separation based on particle size – screens & presses. 2. Separation based on density of the manure – gravity & cyclones 3. Can provide solid removal efficiencies in the range of 10% to 60% depending on species and manure solids content.
  • 4. Some simple screen type separators
  • 5. Some types of press separators
  • 6. Combination of an in-channel flighted conveyor screen and a small screw press to treat liquid swine manure Screw Press
  • 7. Liquid-solid separator that employs three techniques: fine stationary incline screen (0.020 in), screw press, and an inclined flighted conveyor screen (courtesy of US FARM Systems, Tulare, CA).
  • 9. Since the settled solids are slurry they can be used to load a press if dry solids are needed.
  • 10. Chemicals can be used to remove 70% to 90% of the solids and P for most methods of liquid-solid separation - Need proper dose - Need proper mixing - Need proper dilution - Need $$$
  • 11. Benefits of Liquid-Solid Separation for Manure Storages – not for recycle systems This is not a lagoon.
  • 12. Benefits of Liquid-Solid Separation for Storages  Remove large particles to reduce energy and time needed for agitation and pumping  Reduce manure storage volume by up to 20% if TS removal is on the order of 40%.  Remove large particles that could cause clogging of pipes and nozzles.
  • 13. Manure Treatment Lagoons Are Different From Storages– best for recycle systems
  • 14. Lagoon Sizing  Lagoon Volume = (Manure Volume + Treatment Volume + Sludge Storage Volume)  On top of these volumes add DEPTHS for Net Rain (P+R), 25 year – 24 hr storm + minimum of 12” of freeboard.  These depths are required for any manure storage.
  • 16. Well treated recycled lagoon water needed for manure removal.  High loading rates = strong recycle water for flush and pit-recharge buildings.  Need well treated lagoon water to make recycle flush and pit-recharge buildings function properly.  Maximum loading for recycle should be based on ASABE Standard.
  • 17. Use of a mechanical separator (MS) to reduce loading on lagoon
  • 18. Enhancing solids and nutrient removal by using chemicals slows the system down in this configuration.
  • 19. Gravity settling can be used to make high-rate mechanical separation easier – also reduces chemical costs.
  • 20. Add a settling basin or pond before the lagoon – basins drain dry, ponds do not.
  • 21. Can use chemicals to enhance removal of solids and plant nutrients for a settling basin or pond.
  • 22. Manure Storage Volume  Will include all manure, wasted water, and other solids added to manure per day (bedding and wasted feed)  Typically use a storage period ranging from 180 days in warm southern climates to 365 days in cold climates (e.g. Midwest)  Liquid-solid separation can reduce this volume by 10% to 25%. Best to be conservative.
  • 23. Treatment Volume  Depends on VS loading rate , LR = lb VS/1000ft3/day.  TV (ft3) = 1000 (lb VS/day / LR)  Design loading rate depends on the climate.  Larger loading rates can be used in warm climates than in cold climates (ANSI/ASAE EP403.4, ASABE, 2011)
  • 24. Variation of LR With Climate (ANSI/ASAE EP403.4, ASABE, 2011) Loading Rate, lb Location VS/1000ft3/day Southern Minnesota (Cold) 3.0 Iowa 3.5 Kansas 4.0 North Carolina 4.5 South Carolina & Georgia 5.0 Central Texas 5.5 Central Florida (Hot) 6.0
  • 25. VS Removal Reduces TV, ft3 / 1000 lb of live animal weight, Finishing Swine (5.01 lb VS/1000 lb) Loading Rate VS Removed by Liquid-Solid Separation lb VS/1000 ft3-d 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 3.0, MN 1668 1335 1001 667.3 333.7 3.5, IA 1430 1144 858.0 572.0 286.0 4.0, KS 1251 1001 750.8 500.5 250.3 4.5, NC 1112 889.8 667.3 444.9 222.4 5.0, SC 1001 800.8 600.6 400.4 200.2 5.5, TX 910.0 728.0 546.0 364.0 182.0 6.0, FL 834.2 667.3 500.5 333.7 166.8
  • 26. VS Removal Reduces TV, ft3 / 1000 lb of live animal weight, Dairy Cows (11.8 lb VS/1000 lb) Loading Rate VS Removed by Liquid-Solid Separation lb VS/1000 ft3-d 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 3.0, MN 3936 3149 2362 1574 787.2 3.5, IA 3374 2699 2024 1349 674.7 4.0, KS 2952 2362 1771 1181 590.4 4.5, NC 2624 2099 1574 1050 524.8 5.0, SC 2362 1889 1417 944.6 472.3 5.5, TX 2147 1718 1288 858.8 429.4 6.0, FL 1968 1574 1181 787.2 393.6
  • 27. Sludge Storage Volume, ft3/1000lb /year (ANSI/ASAE EP403.4, ASABE, 2011)  Depends on TS loading rate , MTS = lb TS added per year.  Sludge accumulation rates:  Swine = 0.0219 ft3/lb TS Added  Dairy = 0.0729 ft3/lb TS Added
  • 28. Liquid-solid separation will reduce sludge build up in a treatment lagoon – Critical for dairy! Swine Dairy TS Removed By Sludge Volume Sludge Volume Separator Per Year Per Year 0% 52.0 ft3/AU 383.2 ft3/AU 20% 41.6 306.5 40% 31.2 229.9 60% 20.8 153.3 80% 10.4 76.63 Solids Production: Swine = 6.5 lb TS/AU/day, Dairy = 14.4lb/AU/day
  • 29. Odor Reduction?  Research has shown that most of the odor comes from particles that are smaller than 0.0098” (0.25mm).  Must have high-rate separation to greatly reduce odor production from liquid manure.  However lower VS loading rates have been shown to reduce frequency of odor from a lagoon.
  • 30. Effect of VS Loading Rate on Odor Frequency (adapted from Humenik, et al. 1981)
  • 31. Summary  Liquid-solid separation can be used to significantly reduce treatment and sludge storage volumes.  Allows use of smaller structures to save money.  Allows more economical use of lower loading rates to improve recycle water quality.  Can help reduce ammonia and odor production
  • 32. Summary (2)  Can allow use of anaerobic treatment lagoons in colder climates.  Can be used to remove a portion of VS and Organic-N that would breakdown in the lagoon to yield methane, ammonia, and carbon dioxide.  Reduces cost of sludge management to maintain lagoon function.
  • 33. Agricultural Mechanization & Business School of Agricultural, Forest, and Environmental Sciences Contact: Christi Leard 864.656.3250