Call-to-action
A G R I C U L T U R E a n d C L I M A T E R E S I L I E N C E
Technical Assistance Facility for Large
Scale Climate Action Projects
Baskar Reddy and Simon Winter
01
Climate Impact on Smallholder
Agriculture
Implications of climate change on smallholder farmers and current
state of investments in climate adaptation
02
Challenges in Adaptation in Agriculture
Smallholder View and Climate Financiers View
03
SACCA Concept - Goals and Ambitions
Understanding the specific objectives and aspirations of SACCA in
ensuring climate resilience among SHFs
04
Key Principles and Strategies
Unveiling the fundamental principles and strategies employed by
SACCA for sustainable agriculture transformation.
05
SACCA Use Cases
Example of large-scale climate adaptation projects and how to unlock
climate finance
06
Technical Assistance Facility
Need for TAF and role of TAF in SACCA Projects and financial model of
TAF
Agenda
Need for a Technical Assistance Facility
Heightened Risks
Exposure to increased vulnerabilities due to climate change, affecting
livelihoods and well-being
Consequences
• Food security crises
• Poverty escalation
• Involuntary migration
• Decline of soil health and ecosystem biodiversity
• Disrupted supply chains
• Large scale devastation of fragile landscapes and water systems
Climate Change
Impact on
Smallholder
Agriculture and
Investments
Required
C L I M A T E V U L N E R A B I L I T Y
Climate Adaptation Efforts Lagging
Support for adapting to climate adaptation trails mitigation actions,
with only USD 5.53 billion per annum allocated to smallholder
adaptation. This severely hinders progress in building resilience.
Climate Finance
Developing countries require USD 2.3-2.5 trillion per year of climate
finance by 2030 to meet climate goals. However, as of now only USD 20
billion is being invested in agriculture.
Fragmented smallholder producers
01
Fragmented smallholder producers hinder the scalability and
impact of adaptation efforts.
Need for behavior change among stakeholders
02
Reluctance (behavioral change) among farmers to invest in and
adopt new technologies and services and diversify cropping.
Transition costs and loss of income in some cases
03
Adoption of new technologies and practices would involve new
investments and costs which smallholder farmers are unable to
absorb on a purely commercial basis.
Adaptation Challenges from
Smallholders Point of View
Adaptation Challenges from
Climate Financiers Point of
View
Lack of Aggregation or Scalable Climate Innovation Bundles
01
Lack of orchestrators who can aggregate thousands of SHFs
and individual climate smart technologies (eg solar irrigation
pumps) currently on offer. For scalability, climate smart bundles
financed through large-scale adaptation projects are needed to
cover risks.
Lack of Investible Projects
02
Lack of scale projects and well-structured investible projects.
Most projects are developed by project developers or NGOs
and do not include system finance models at landscape level.
A G R I C U L T U R A L T R A N S F O R M A T I O N , C L I M A T E
R E S I L I E N C E , S A C C A
Smallholder Action Coalition
for Climate Adaptation in
Agriculture (SACCA)
Initiative to bridge gaps between Climate Innovations Delivery and Climate
Finance
A G R I C U L T U R A L T R A N S F O R M A T I O N , C L I M A T E
R E S I L I E N C E , S A C C A
Climate
Finance
Orchestrato
r
Agri-
Entrepreneurs
Climate
Innovation
Organizations
Smallholder
Farmers
First-Mile
Delivery
Organizatio
ns
Global AE
Academy/
First-Mile
Orchestrato
r
Climate
Innovation
Orchestrator
Ag Production
Products/Services
Technical Assistance
Debt/Loans/Equity
Concessional Finance
Financial
Institutions*
* Financial Institutions include climate financiers
Core Pillars in SACCA
Climate Innovations, Delivery and Climate Finance
Social
Enterprise
Funded through grants
to set-up TAF and hire
small team to develop
SACCA projects
Financial
Sustainability
Sustained by design
grants from GCF and
other climate funders,
as well as success fee
generated on unlocking
blended finance
Developing
Investible
Projects
Success fee earned from
developing projects,
deploying innovations
across different
geographies and
licensing digital assets
Technical Assistance Facility
Need for Orchestrators to Develop SACCA
Projects
Seed Fund to Kick Start
TAF Financial Model -
Illustrative
F I N A N C I A L P R O J E C T I O N S
Anchor grant
01
The initial $1.5 million annual grant for two years
would provide stability and resources for the crucial
first years of the TAF project, enabling foundational
work and strategic investment.
Annual revenues
02
Steady increase in revenues from $ 0.67 million in
year 1 to $ 3.7 million by year 5.
Cash at the end of the year 1 is $ 1.18 million and
this increases to $ 6.5 million by the end of the year
5.
Two major implications of this healthy cash in TAF :
• There is a room for undertaking more SACCA
projects
• Even if 1-2 projects are not realized as per the
projections, TAF will continue to be sustainable
over the years
Cash at the end of the
Year
03
SACCA Technical Assistance
Facility
USD (000)
Projected Financial Plan
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
INCOME STATEMENT (P/l)
Net revenues 675 1,380 2,110 2,894 3,708
Total Cost of Services 656 734 1,081 1,138 1,199
Gross Profit 19 646 1,029 1,756 2,509
Total expenses 363 392 540 563 664
Net Earnings (344) 254 489 1,194 1,845
BALANCE SHEET
Total Current Assets 1,181 2,937 3,426 4,617 6,465
Total Liabilities 0 0 0 0 0
Retained earnings
(cumulative - includes
rollover)
(344) (90) 399 1,593 3,438
Funding from grants
(cumulative) 1,530 3,030 3,030 3,030 3,030
Less: cum distribution to
equity investors 0 0 0 0 0
Total shareholders' equity 1,186 2,940 3,429 4,623 6,468
CASH FLOW STATEMENT
Cash and cash equivalent -
start of period 0 1,181 2,937 3,426 4,617
Net cash from operating
activities (342) 257 493 1,198 1,849
Net cash from investing
activities (7) (1) (4) (7) (1)
Net cash used in financing
Climate Investment
Pipeline
TAF will create a pipeline
of 9-10 SACCA projects
with a potential for
unlocking
USD 1-1.5 billion of
climate finance
Ensuring climate
resilience for at least 5-7
million smallholders and
accelerate the adoption
of climate innovations
Benefits of Funding
TAF
Need for Orchestrators to Develop SACCA
Projects
Playbook for
Investible Projects
New Partnerships
Best Practices in
Delivery and
Innovations
Launch a playbook and
common operating
system for developing
asset class of agriculture
climate adaptation
projects
Potential future
partnerships with other
investors, who would be
part of the SACCA
projects
Best practices from
SACCA Projects could
be used by Climate
Action Funders and
Philanthropies in other
climate investments that
they make
Climate Resilience
among SHFs
Thank You
Call for Action
Please contact baskar.reddy@sf-india.in or
simon.winter@susagfoundation.org
if you are interested in partnering in SACCA TAF
Join Now

Jul 30 - 2nd Presentation Technical Assistance Facility V2.pptx

  • 1.
    Call-to-action A G RI C U L T U R E a n d C L I M A T E R E S I L I E N C E Technical Assistance Facility for Large Scale Climate Action Projects Baskar Reddy and Simon Winter
  • 2.
    01 Climate Impact onSmallholder Agriculture Implications of climate change on smallholder farmers and current state of investments in climate adaptation 02 Challenges in Adaptation in Agriculture Smallholder View and Climate Financiers View 03 SACCA Concept - Goals and Ambitions Understanding the specific objectives and aspirations of SACCA in ensuring climate resilience among SHFs 04 Key Principles and Strategies Unveiling the fundamental principles and strategies employed by SACCA for sustainable agriculture transformation. 05 SACCA Use Cases Example of large-scale climate adaptation projects and how to unlock climate finance 06 Technical Assistance Facility Need for TAF and role of TAF in SACCA Projects and financial model of TAF Agenda Need for a Technical Assistance Facility
  • 3.
    Heightened Risks Exposure toincreased vulnerabilities due to climate change, affecting livelihoods and well-being Consequences • Food security crises • Poverty escalation • Involuntary migration • Decline of soil health and ecosystem biodiversity • Disrupted supply chains • Large scale devastation of fragile landscapes and water systems Climate Change Impact on Smallholder Agriculture and Investments Required C L I M A T E V U L N E R A B I L I T Y Climate Adaptation Efforts Lagging Support for adapting to climate adaptation trails mitigation actions, with only USD 5.53 billion per annum allocated to smallholder adaptation. This severely hinders progress in building resilience. Climate Finance Developing countries require USD 2.3-2.5 trillion per year of climate finance by 2030 to meet climate goals. However, as of now only USD 20 billion is being invested in agriculture.
  • 4.
    Fragmented smallholder producers 01 Fragmentedsmallholder producers hinder the scalability and impact of adaptation efforts. Need for behavior change among stakeholders 02 Reluctance (behavioral change) among farmers to invest in and adopt new technologies and services and diversify cropping. Transition costs and loss of income in some cases 03 Adoption of new technologies and practices would involve new investments and costs which smallholder farmers are unable to absorb on a purely commercial basis. Adaptation Challenges from Smallholders Point of View Adaptation Challenges from Climate Financiers Point of View Lack of Aggregation or Scalable Climate Innovation Bundles 01 Lack of orchestrators who can aggregate thousands of SHFs and individual climate smart technologies (eg solar irrigation pumps) currently on offer. For scalability, climate smart bundles financed through large-scale adaptation projects are needed to cover risks. Lack of Investible Projects 02 Lack of scale projects and well-structured investible projects. Most projects are developed by project developers or NGOs and do not include system finance models at landscape level.
  • 5.
    A G RI C U L T U R A L T R A N S F O R M A T I O N , C L I M A T E R E S I L I E N C E , S A C C A Smallholder Action Coalition for Climate Adaptation in Agriculture (SACCA) Initiative to bridge gaps between Climate Innovations Delivery and Climate Finance
  • 6.
    A G RI C U L T U R A L T R A N S F O R M A T I O N , C L I M A T E R E S I L I E N C E , S A C C A Climate Finance Orchestrato r Agri- Entrepreneurs Climate Innovation Organizations Smallholder Farmers First-Mile Delivery Organizatio ns Global AE Academy/ First-Mile Orchestrato r Climate Innovation Orchestrator Ag Production Products/Services Technical Assistance Debt/Loans/Equity Concessional Finance Financial Institutions* * Financial Institutions include climate financiers Core Pillars in SACCA Climate Innovations, Delivery and Climate Finance
  • 7.
    Social Enterprise Funded through grants toset-up TAF and hire small team to develop SACCA projects Financial Sustainability Sustained by design grants from GCF and other climate funders, as well as success fee generated on unlocking blended finance Developing Investible Projects Success fee earned from developing projects, deploying innovations across different geographies and licensing digital assets Technical Assistance Facility Need for Orchestrators to Develop SACCA Projects Seed Fund to Kick Start
  • 8.
    TAF Financial Model- Illustrative F I N A N C I A L P R O J E C T I O N S Anchor grant 01 The initial $1.5 million annual grant for two years would provide stability and resources for the crucial first years of the TAF project, enabling foundational work and strategic investment. Annual revenues 02 Steady increase in revenues from $ 0.67 million in year 1 to $ 3.7 million by year 5. Cash at the end of the year 1 is $ 1.18 million and this increases to $ 6.5 million by the end of the year 5. Two major implications of this healthy cash in TAF : • There is a room for undertaking more SACCA projects • Even if 1-2 projects are not realized as per the projections, TAF will continue to be sustainable over the years Cash at the end of the Year 03 SACCA Technical Assistance Facility USD (000) Projected Financial Plan 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 INCOME STATEMENT (P/l) Net revenues 675 1,380 2,110 2,894 3,708 Total Cost of Services 656 734 1,081 1,138 1,199 Gross Profit 19 646 1,029 1,756 2,509 Total expenses 363 392 540 563 664 Net Earnings (344) 254 489 1,194 1,845 BALANCE SHEET Total Current Assets 1,181 2,937 3,426 4,617 6,465 Total Liabilities 0 0 0 0 0 Retained earnings (cumulative - includes rollover) (344) (90) 399 1,593 3,438 Funding from grants (cumulative) 1,530 3,030 3,030 3,030 3,030 Less: cum distribution to equity investors 0 0 0 0 0 Total shareholders' equity 1,186 2,940 3,429 4,623 6,468 CASH FLOW STATEMENT Cash and cash equivalent - start of period 0 1,181 2,937 3,426 4,617 Net cash from operating activities (342) 257 493 1,198 1,849 Net cash from investing activities (7) (1) (4) (7) (1) Net cash used in financing
  • 9.
    Climate Investment Pipeline TAF willcreate a pipeline of 9-10 SACCA projects with a potential for unlocking USD 1-1.5 billion of climate finance Ensuring climate resilience for at least 5-7 million smallholders and accelerate the adoption of climate innovations Benefits of Funding TAF Need for Orchestrators to Develop SACCA Projects Playbook for Investible Projects New Partnerships Best Practices in Delivery and Innovations Launch a playbook and common operating system for developing asset class of agriculture climate adaptation projects Potential future partnerships with other investors, who would be part of the SACCA projects Best practices from SACCA Projects could be used by Climate Action Funders and Philanthropies in other climate investments that they make Climate Resilience among SHFs
  • 10.
    Thank You Call forAction Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] if you are interested in partnering in SACCA TAF Join Now