Lattice Energy LLC - Many body collective magnetic mechanism creates ultrahigh energy cosmic rays - Jan 1 2016

January 1, 2016 Lattice Energy LLC, Copyright 2016 All rights reserved 1
Lattice Energy LLC
Mechanism for ultrahigh energy cosmic rays
Widom-Larsen-Srivastava first published physics in 2008
Contact: 1-312-861-0115 Chicago, Illinois USA lewisglarsen@gmail.com
Lewis Larsen
President and CEO
January 1, 2016
Cat’s Eye nebula - NASA (Hubble) Image in ultraviolet - TRACE/NASA
p
n
Many-body collective effects in magnetic flux tubes accelerate particles
Supernova blast remnant Magnetic flux tubes on Sun
Herein we calculate one-shot, mean center-of-mass acceleration energies for
protons in collapsing protoneutron stars (5.5 x 1018 eV), two cases for black
hole accretion disks (2.2 x 1017 eV and 0.9 x 1019 eV), and for the jet base of a
supermassive black hole (2.2 x 1021 eV)

Contents
Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 - 7
Important to understand production mechanisms and sources of cosmic rays ................ 8 - 9
W-L-S theory: many-body collective effects enable electroweak processes ...............…. 10 - 11
Russian data supports W-L-S e- + p+ electroweak mechanism in lightning .....................… 12
Old and new paradigms about nucleosynthesis of elements in the Universe …................ 13 - 16
Overview of domains for W-L-S theory’s many-body collective processes ....................... 17 - 19
W-L-S theory in astrophysical plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes ...................................... 20 - 23
Collective step-up transformer model explains anomalous heating of solar corona ......... 24 - 26
Sun’s plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes (coronal loops) create high energy particles ...... 27 - 31
Photon spectrum in pulsed-current LENR experiments like astrophysical γ-ray bursts .... 32
Plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes on neutron stars and magnetars ……………………....... 33 - 36
Calculation of W-L-S particle acceleration energy during protoneutron star collapse ..... 37 - 38
Plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes exist around black holes and their accretion disks ..... 39 - 44
Many data suggest strong magnetic fields near black holes, accretion disks, and jets …. 45 - 46
Calculation of W-L-S particle acceleration energies in locations near black holes …….... 47 - 49
New data suggests hotspot near Ursa Major for most energetic cosmic rays > 57 EeV .... 50
Astrophysical sources of ultrahigh energy gamma photons ………………….……………..... 51 - 52
New paradigm: low-rate electroweak process-driven nucleosynthesis maybe common ... 53 - 72
Final quotation (Frank Wilczek, 2015) ………..................................................................... 73
Hyperlinked references …………………………………………………………………..……………..74 - 78

Summary
W-L-S equations for calculation of center-of-mass acceleration energy
 In 2008 (arXiv) and 2010 (Pramana), we derived and published approximate, rule-of-
thumb formulas for calculating estimated one-shot, mean center-of-mass acceleration
energies for charged particles present in plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes (also called
“coronal loops”) for two cases: (1) steady-state and (2) explosive destruction of an
unstable flux tube (this second case is subset of “magnetic reconnection” processes)
 These relatively straightforward relationships were discovered in the process of
elaborating and extending our theory of many-body collective effects and electroweak
reactions involving protons and electrons in condensed matter systems on small
length-scales (where short-range, ultra-high strength electric fields dominate) to
analogous, much larger-scale electromagnetic systems in which magnetic fields
dominate and provide input energy required to drive certain types of electroweak
processes, produce pair plasmas, and create elemental nucleosynthesis
 Our simple equations for magnetic flux tubes are robust and scale-independent. They
consequently have broad applicability from exploding wires (which in early stages of
explosion comprise dense dusty plasmas), lightning, to solar flux tubes and other
astrophysical environments that are characterized by vastly higher magnetic fields;
these include many other types of stars besides the Sun, neutron stars, magnetars,
and regions located near black holes and active galactic nuclei
Eq. (20) in
Pramana paper (2010)
Accelerated particles
center-of-mass energy
for exploding flux tube

Summary
Many-body collective effects enable electron-proton electroweak reactions
 FIG.2 shows the electro-weak boson exchange
Feynman diagram for electron-proton scattering
in colliding electron and proton beams inside a
plasma-filled magnetic flux tube at high energies
 Expression { e− + p+ → l + X } includes photon γ
and Z exchange wherein the final state lepton is
an electron for the case of photon γ or Z
exchange and the final state lepton is a neutrino
for the case of W − exchange. On an energy scale
of ∼300 GeV, all of these exchange processes
have amplitudes of similar orders of magnitude
 Solar flare or coronal mass ejecting event is
thereby accompanied by an increased emission
of solar neutrinos over a broad energy scale as
well as relativistic protons, neutrons and
electrons. Full plethora of final X states including
electron, muon and pion particle anti-particle
pairs should also be present in such events
e-* + p+ g n + νe
e- + p+ g lepton + X
When electric fields dominate
Magnetic fields dominate at
very high energies in plasmas
Collective many-body
electroweak reactions
require input energy
FIG. 2: Boson exchange diagrams
for electron-proton scattering into
a lepton plus “anything”
“High energy particles in the solar corona”
A. Widom, Y. Srivastava, and L. Larsen
arXiv:nucl-th/0804.2647v1 (2008)

Summary
Many-body collective effects enable electron-proton electroweak reactions
 Conversion of magnetic field energy into relativistic particle kinetic energy via a
Faraday law voltage pulse is collective in that the magnetic flux in the core of the
vortex depends on the rotational currents of all of the initial protons and electrons
 “On the energy scale W magnetic ≪ 300 GeV of Eq.(13), the weak interaction p+ e−
processes Eq.(7) that produce neutrons proceed more slowly than the purely
electromagnetic p+ e− processes. Nevertheless one finds appreciable neutron
production in the solar corona. The production of neutrons among the protons allows
for the creation of nuclei with higher mass numbers via neutron capture nuclear
reactions and subsequent beta decays.” arXiv:nucl-th/0804.2647v1
 Relativistic neutrons produced by high-energy electroweak e + p reactions in plasma-
filled magnetic flux tubes will have low capture cross-sections on seed elements per
the 1/v proportionality rule. Nonetheless, neutron-driven nucleosynthesis (albeit at
vastly lower rates vs. supernovas) akin to astrophysical r- ands-processes can occur
in and near such commonplace magnetic structures found in varied astrophysical
environments including stars’ atmospheres, on accretion disks, and near black holes
 Nucleosynthesis occurs in regions besides stellar cores and supernova explosions
e-* + p+ g n + νe
Electric fields dominate
Magnetic fields dominate
electroweak reactions
require input energy

Summary
W-L-S particle acceleration works in many astrophysical environments
 W-L-S many-body collective particle acceleration mechanism agrees with published
experimental data from terrestrial exploding wire experiments, production of low-
energy neutrons in atmospheric lightning (Gurevich et al. PRL 2012), and energetic
particles emitted from the Sun. Successfully explains observations of 300 - 500 GeV
protons and GeV neutrons produced in some large solar flares (CERN L3+C group
and BAKSAN data). “We do not know of any other process that could accelerate
charged particles to beyond even a few GeV, let alone hundreds of GeVs.” Pramana
 This “mechanism also naturally explains a variety of observed experimental results
such as unexpected nuclear transmutations and high-energy cosmic rays from the
exterior of the Sun or any other astronomical object endowed with strong enough
magnetic activity such as active galactic nuclei [e.g., Mrk 231].” Pramana (2010)
 Current best estimate for half-life of a free neutron at very low kinetic energy is ~15
minutes. Traveling at 0.999999c, GeV-energy neutrons produced via the collective
electroweak e + p reaction will, thanks to relativistic time dilation, have an apparent
half-life of ~173 hours from the reference frame of an outside observer. In the case
of GeV neutrons emitted from solar flares, 99+ % will not decay by the time they
reach earth and can thus be detected. By contrast, only 5 x 10-16 of the original flux
of GeV-energy solar neutrons will remain after they have traveled a light year away
from a given source. By then, almost all of them will have decayed and contributed
to the cosmic flux of high-energy electrons, protons, and antineutrinos. GeV-energy
neutrons from closest star system, Alpha Centauri, could not be detected on Earth

Summary
W-L-S particle acceleration mechanism useful for understanding sources
 Identification of ultimate sources and nature of charged particle acceleration
mechanisms that create ultrahigh high energy cosmic rays, as well as providing a
detailed explanation for distinctive features of the shape of the cosmic-ray energy
spectrum, e.g. “knee” and “ankle”, have been longstanding questions in astrophysics
 Herein we show how plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes likely occur in many different
astrophysical systems from relatively small objects (neutron stars and magnetars) to
relatively large objects (accretion disks and jet bases of supermassive black holes).
When these ordered magnetic structures explode (reconnection, flares), enormous
amounts of magnetic energy are converted into kinetic energy of charged particles
present inside exploding flux tubes. Using reasonable parametric assumptions, we
calculate one-shot, center-of-mass acceleration energies for protons in collapsing
protoneutron stars (5.5 x 1018 eV), two cases for BH accretion disks (2.2 x 1017 eV and
0.9 x 1019 eV), and finally for the jet base of a supermassive black hole (2.2 x 1021 eV)
 What all these numbers suggest, including those for the Sun, is that W-L-S particle
acceleration mechanism for magnetic flux tubes can create cosmic ray particles at
energies that span the entire cosmic-ray energy spectrum from top to bottom. This
argues that commonplace flux tubes may well play a significant role in generating the
observed cosmic ray energy spectrum and would be consistent with apparent overall
anisotropy of sources at all but the very highest particle energies. That said, we think
a number of different acceleration mechanisms likely contribute to entire spectrum,
including shock acceleration and perhaps exotic mechanisms such as evaporation of
gaseous winds from neutron stars (Widom et al. arXiv:1410.6498v2 - 2015)

Importance of acceleration mechanisms for UHE cosmic rays
Quotes from Etienne Parizot’s 2014 UHE CR paper in Nuclear Physics B
 “The main reason why the origin of cosmic rays(CRs) is still unknown, one century
after their discovery, is that they are charged nuclei isotropized by the turbulent
magnetic field in the Galaxy to such a high degree that their observed flux is
essentially identical in all directions, with no sources or decisive hot spots
identified in any region the sky (cf. below, Sect. 2).”
 “The longstanding quest for the origin of CRs is not only motivated by the desire to
obtain a more complete description of the Galactic ecology. It is also related to the
wish to better understand particle acceleration in general, which is a key
ingredient of the modeling of high-energy astrophysical sources.”
 “Another way to obtain additional constraints about the cosmic-ray sources is to
study the highest-energy end of the spectrum, where the acceleration mechanisms
appear to be the most challenging. While the so-called ultra-high-energy cosmic
rays (UHECRs), with energies above ∼ 1019 eV, are most likely to have an
extragalactic origin, their much larger magnetic rigidity than the low-energy GCRs
may allow the observation of distinct sources in the sky, and provide more direct
information about their nature. Moreover, the study of the transition between the
Galactic and extragalactic cosmic rays (EGCRs) is important to derive constraints
about the highest-energy particles accelerated in our Galaxy, which might in turn
challenge the most popular scenarios for the origin of GCRs.”

Credit: Olena Shmahalo / Quanta magazine;
original data via S. Swordy, Univ. of Chicago
Cosmic-ray energy spectrum: flux vs. energy in eVs
Quoted from review article by A. A. Watson (2014)
“In many books on high-energy astrophysics a plot of
the cosmic-ray energy spectrum similar to that of figure
1 [4] will be found: the flux falls by 25 orders of
magnitude over 11 decades of energy. By comparison
with a plot of the electromagnetic spectrum over the
same span, this spectrum is remarkably featureless.
There is an increase of slope at about 3 - 5 × 1015 eV,
known as the ‘knee’, where the flux of particles is about
one per square metre per year. The spectrum flattens
again near ~ 4 ×1018 eV, the ‘ankle’, above which only a
few particles arrive per square kilometre per year.
Recently a second knee in the spectrum of particles
with greater than average mass has been reported at ~
8 x 1016 eV, about 26 times higher than the knee and
thus consistent with the idea that knee features are
rigidity related [5]. In this article I will concentrate on
the higher-energy region where the flux becomes even
lower. It is commonly maintained that most particles
above the ankle have an extragalactic origin although
this is by no means well-established and debate rages
as to how the ankle can be explained. There is also
serious discussion of the possibility that even the
highest-energy particles might have been produced in
our galaxy, perhaps in association with a gamma-ray
burst or a magnetar, about 105 years ago [6, 7].”

e-* + p+ g n + νe
Electroweak particle reactions produce neutrons (n) and neutrinos (νe)
Key reactions in Widom-Larsen-Srivastava theory
Many-body collective processes produce neutrons and other particles
Neutrons are captured by elements which trigger nuclear transmutation reactions
n + (Z, A) g (Z, A+1)
(Z, A+1) g (Z + 1, A+1) + eβ
- + νe
Unstable neutron-rich products of neutron captures will undergo beta- decay
Create heavier stable isotopes or heavier elements along rows of Periodic Table
Many-body collective production of neutrons, neutrinos, and other particles:
Transmutation of elements and nucleosynthesis outside of stellar cores:
Neutron capture
Beta-minus decay
Neutron capture-driven
LENR transmutation
reactions
Electric fields dominate
Magnetic fields dominate
processes require
external input energy

LENRs operate like r- and s-process in condensed matter
Electroweak e- + p+ reactions can occur in domains besides supernovae
 In our European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields
paper (2006) we explained how many-body collective
quantum effects in condensed matter can produce ultralow
energy neutrons via the electroweak e- + p+ reaction in
tabletop apparatus under very modest macrophysical
conditions. Results of subsequent neutron-catalyzed
transmutation reactions resemble astrophysical s- and r-
processes only at temperatures vastly lower than with stars
 We next analyzed and explained case of LENR transmutation
products observed in high pulsed-current exploding wires
with cylindrical geometries; note that collective many-body
magnetic effects (B-fields) dominate therein. This case
differs from condensed matter chemical cells wherein
micron-scale, nuclear-strength local E-fields and local
breakdown of Born-Oppenheimer are much more important
 Once one understands LENRs in magnetically dominated
collective systems, lightning discharges are conceptually
like a big exploding wire up in the sky. Moreover, predicted
electroweak e- + p+ reactions inside solar coronal loops and
flares is direct extension of the same physics principles

Russian data supports our e- + p+ mechanism in lightning
Abstract: “We report here for the first time about the registration of an extraordinary
high flux of low-energy neutrons generated during thunderstorms. The measured
neutron count rate enhancements are directly connected with thunderstorm
discharges. The low-energy neutron flux value obtained in our work is a challenge for
the photonuclear channel of neutron generation in thunderstorm: the estimated
value of the needed high-energy γ-ray flux is about 3 orders of magnitude higher
than that one observed.”
Lattice comments: experimental data collected by Gurevich et al. and published in
Phys Rev Lett is the first instance in which: (a) observed neutron fluxes associated
with lightning discharges could be accurately counted, well-estimated quantitatively,
and temporally correlated with lightning discharges; and (b) better insights were
achieved into energy spectra of such lightning-produced neutrons. Importantly, size
of low-energy neutron fluxes observed by Gurevich et al. are much too large to be
explained by photonuclear mechanism (which in recent years was thought by many
to explain neutron production in lightning channels). Given that fusion processes had
already been decisively ruled-out in years prior to a recent rise in popularity of the
photonuclear mechanism (see L. Babich & R. R-Dupre - 2007), the Widom-Larsen-
Srivastava many-body, collective magnetic e- + p+ weak-interaction mechanism is the
only theoretical approach that can successfully explain key features of this new data
“Strong flux of low-energy neutrons produced by thunderstorms”
A. Gurevich et al., Physical Review Letters 108 pp. 125001 - 4 (2012)
http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v108/i12/e125001

Old paradigm: stars create most elements in Periodic Table
Big Bang and cosmic ray spallation produce all the remaining elements
r- & s-processes produce all elements not created by Big Bang, CRs, or spallation
Credit: Cmglee via Wikipedia

Present astrophysical paradigm about nucleosynthesis
Depending on mass, Big Bang, fusion, s-/r-processes create elements
Fusion, s-/r-processes happen in stars - little nucleosynthesis occurs elsewhere
Fusion
Adapted after Lodders (2003)
Mainly neutron captures + beta decays

Present astrophysical paradigm about nucleosynthesis
http://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/32_n-synth/nucleosynthesis.html

New: nucleosynthesis occurs well-outside of stellar cores
Elemental transmutations go left-to-right across rows of Periodic Table
Neutron-catalyzed transmutations can produce elements heavier than Hydrogen

W-L-S theory spans vast range of length-scales and energies
E-fields in condensed matter vs. B-field particle acceleration in plasmas
Increasingneutronandchargedparticleenergies
Short-range
collective
electric field
effects
dominate
Longer-range
collective
magnetic field
effects begin
to dominate
Long-range
collective
magnetic
field effects
dominate
Scales-up to very large length scales Huge range of magnetic field strengths
Highcurrents:
electronsand/orions
• Stars - additional nuclear reactions occur in photospheres, flares, and further out in coronas
• Dusty, hydrogen-rich nebular plasma clouds exposed to stellar photon and particle radiation
• Magnetars/active galactic nuclei: W-L mechanism can in theory create UHE TeV cosmic rays
e* + p+ g 1 neutron + neutrino or e* + d+ g 2 neutrons + neutrino
Neutron production, capture, release energy, and transmutation products
• Microorganisms – biological transmutations by certain types of earthly bacteria & fungi
• Pressure gradients across membranes – e.g., Iwamura, Li, & Arata-Zhang - gas phase
• Current-driven P&F-type chemical cells - liquid phase; glow discharge cells - gas phase
• Laser-triggered chemical cells – e.g., Letts, Cravens, Violante, etc. - liquid or gas phase
• RF-triggered dusty plasmas - gas phase
• Current-driven dusty plasmas - gas phase
• Vacuum diodes – e.g. Proton-21, Kiev, Ukraine, Sandia NL (US) in 1970s - gas phase
• Exploding wires – e.g., Wendt & Irion, Chicago 1922; Z-pinch, Sandia NL - gas phase
• Piezoelectric and pyroelectric processes in solid-state materials – Carpinteri, Naranjo
• Magnetic flux compression generators, e.g. US (LANL), Russia
• Lightning (terrestrial, planetary, nebular), especially in dusty environments – e.g., Dwyer
• ULMN-catalyzed subcritical fission reactors (<<< nuclear waste) - reprocess old wastes
Higherfluxesofneutrons
~0eVUltralowenergyneutrons………..MeVneutrons…GeV…TeVs…EeVs
Magnetic effects dominate large length-scale plasmas: e- + p+ g lepton + X
Regime: ultralow energy neutron reactions (LENRs) in condensed matter
Mega-scalecurrentsLow-mediumelectric
and/orioncurrents
>>>>fluxes
localelectricfieldsOrganizedmagneticfieldswithplasmas
Higherfluxesofneutrons
Mixed regime: high energy particle reactions and/or LENRs on dust

Note: mass renormalization of electrons by high local E-fields not a key factor in magnetically dominated regimes on large length scales
W-L-S theory and its collective effects extend from LENRs in condensed matter regimes to
environments found in high-current exploding wires, e.g., large wire inductors, as well as up
to large-length-scale, magnetically dominated regimes that occur in astrophysical systems
Length
Scale
Type
of System
Electromagnetic
Regime
Many-body Collective
Phenomena
Comment
Submicron
Certain earthly
bacteria and
some fungi
Very high, short-range
electric fields
Transmutations, high
level of gamma shielding
Obtain unavailable trace
elements; survive deadly
gamma or X-ray radiation
Microns
Hydrogen
isotopes on
metallic surfaces
Very high, short-range
electric fields on solid
substrates
Transmutations, high level
of gamma shielding, heat,
some energetic particles
This regime is useful for
small-scale commercial
power generation
Microns to
many
meters
Exploding wires,
planetary
lightning
Dusty plasmas: mixed
high-current and high
local magnetic fields
Transmutations, ‘leakier’
gamma shielding, heat; X-
rays up to 10 keV, larger
energetic particle fluxes
This regime is useful for
large-scale commercial
power generation
Many
meters to
kilometers
Outer layers and
atmospheres of
stars (flux tubes)
Neutron stars
and active
galactic nuclei in
vicinity of
compact,
massive objects
(black holes)
Ideal and dusty
plasmas: high mega-
currents of electrons,
protons, and ions
inside large-scale,
ordered magnetic
structures with
substantial internal
fields
Energetic charged
particles and neutrons
(MeVs to EeVs), X-rays,
gamma-ray bursts, and
ultra-high-energy cosmic
rays (TeVs to EeVs)
Provides explanation for
heating of solar corona
and radioactive isotopes
in stellar atmospheres
Provides mechanism for
creating extremely high
energy particles in
plasma-filled magnetic
flux tubes with sufficient
field strengths
Up to
several AU
(distance
from earth
to Sun)
Many-body collective effects span vast range of length-scales

Many-body collective magnetic effects accelerate particles
Magnetic field energy collectively transferred to charged particles & ions
 Please note that in magnetically ordered astrophysical plasmas (which typically
occur on relatively large length-scales, as opposed to nanometers to microns for
LENR processes in condensed matter) W-L theory involves many-body collective
magnetic effects. Also note that under these conditions, neutrons produced via
weak interactions per W-L theory are not necessarily ultralow energy (ULE); in
stellar magnetic flux tubes and much more energetic events such as violent flare
explosions, neutrons and varying array of particles (e.g., protons, positrons) may
be created at energies ranging from GeVs to TeVs and all the way to EeVs (1018 eV)
 With dusty astrophysical plasmas in regions where average temperatures are such
that intact embedded dust grains and nanoparticles (which then may be strongly
charged locally) can maintain integrity for a time therein, W-L condensed matter
LENRs producing ~ULE neutrons may also occur on surfaces of such particles
 Quoting from conclusions in our Pramana paper: “Three seemingly diverse
physical phenomena, viz., metallic hydride cells, exploding wires and the solar
corona, do have a unifying theme. Under appropriate conditions which we have
now well delineated, in all these processes electromagnetic energy gets
collectively harnessed to provide enough kinetic energy to a certain fraction of the
electrons to combine with protons (or any other ions present) and produce
neutrons through weak interactions. The produced neutrons then combine with
other nuclei to induce low-energy nuclear reactions and transmutations.”

Quotation from 2010 “Primer” paper published in Pramana
W-L-S mechanism explains production of GeV protons in big Solar flares
“Quite recently [5], another application of the magnetic
mode inducing LENR has been made to unravel the
mystery surrounding the observed particle production
and nuclear transmutations in the solar corona and the
solar flares [15 - 23]. Spectacular pictures of flux tubes
are now available [24] showing giant magnetic flux
tubes exiting out of one sunspot and entering into
another. We showed theoretically [5] how these could
lead to steady LENR. In fierce solar flares, we found
that as a flux tube disintegrates it generated electric
fields strong enough to accelerate electrons and
protons toward each other with the centre of mass
energy of 300 GeV, equivalent to the highest energy
electron-proton colliding beam (HERA) built on Earth.
For a strong solar flare which occurred on 14 July
2000, we computed the flux of muons which reached
Earth. Our theoretical flux agrees quite nicely with the
experimental data from the L3+C Collaboration at LEP
through their observation of high-energy muons
produced in coincidence with this huge flare [23].”
Explosion or disintegration of solar flux tube also called “magnetic reconnection”

Exploding magnetic flux tubes accelerate charged particles
Eq. 20 calculates the mean acceleration energy for a flux tube explosion
“Aprimerforelectro-weakinducedlow
energynuclearreactions”,Y.Srivastava,
A.Widom,andL.Larsen,Pramana-
JournalofPhysics75pp.617-637(2010)

http://solarphysics.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrsp-
2014-4/download/lrsp-2014-4Color.pdf
Fig. 12 - Plasma confined in a loopFig. 1 - Magnetic flux tube
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0804.2647.pdf
Widom, Srivastava & Larsen (2008) F. Reale (2014)
W-L-S posits electroweak e- + p+ reactions in coronal loops
Mechanism will accelerate protons and electrons in magnetic flux tubes
Neutron production and nucleosynthesis can occur outside dense cores of stars

W-L-S theory explains anomalous heating of solar corona
Sun’s corona is 2 million oK but surface temperature only 6,000 oK - Why?
Credit: Ian O'Neill in his Ph.D. thesis titled “Quiescent coronal loops heated by turbulence” (2006)
Sun’s core is at temperature of ~15 million
degrees K; surface of star’s photosphere
and chromosphere are at ~6,000 oK and
10,000 oK respectively. But corona region
at ~ 2 million K is much hotter than surface
of sun. This anomaly seemingly appears to
contradict the laws of thermodynamics.
https://astroengine.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/thesis06.pdf

Step-up electrical transformer is analogue of our explanation for heating
Magnetic flux tubes collectively transfer energy from photosphere up to corona
Quoting: “The essence of the step up
transformer mechanism is that the
kinetic energy distributed among a
very large number of charged particles
in the photosphere can be transferred
via the magnetic flux tube to a
distributed kinetic energy shared
among a distant much smaller number
of charged particles located in the
corona, i.e. a small accelerating
voltage in the primary coil produces a
large accelerating voltage in the
secondary coil. The resulting transfer
of kinetic energy is collective from a
large group of charged particles to a
smaller group of charged particles.
The kinetic energy per charged particle
of the dilute gas in the corona may then
become much higher than the kinetic
energy per charged particle of the
more dense fluid in the photosphere.”
arXiv:nucl-th/0804.2647v1 4 pages (2008)

Step-up electrical transformer is analogue of our explanation for heating
Magnetic flux tubes collectively transfer energy from the photosphere to corona
Transformer
equivalent of solar
coronal region
Transformer
equivalent of solar
photosphere
Electric utility transformers
Step-up transformer equationSecondary
coil
Primary
coil
Transformer core is
analogue of solar
magnetic flux tube
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410549/pdf/rsta20140256.pdf
Below see J. Klimchuk
“Key aspects of coronal
heating” (2015) at URL:

Plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes occur on the Sun
Also called coronal loops; have been observed on other types of stars
These large length-scale ordered magnetic structures quite common in Universe
Credit: NASA SOHO - false-color
image of Sun in extreme ultraviolet
Idealized graphic of magnetic flux
tubes anchored in Sun’s surface

Plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes imaged on solar surface
Large amounts of stored energy are contained in loops’ magnetic fields
Coronal loops (magnetic flux tubes) from Sun’s surface on October 14 - 15, 2014
Credit: NASA - Solar Dynamics Observatory

X-rays are emitted from magnetic flux tubes in solar flares
Radiation produced by electrons accelerated inside such coronal loops
Gamma radiation is produced when electrons accelerated to even higher energies
Credit: Yohkoh imaging team and NASA/Goddard – event occurred January 13, 1992
Details of X-ray image of solar flare observed by Yohkoh Soft X-ray Telescope
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1999/ast02jun99_1/

Explosion of magnetic flux tubes occurs in solar flares
Released magnetic energy increases kinetic energy of particles in loops
Artist's concept shows explosive solar flare evolving into a coronal mass ejection
Credit: NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center

Many-body collective e + p reactions occur on Sun
Quoted from: “A primer for electro-weak energy nuclear reactions”
Nucleosynthesis and energetic particle production occurs in magnetic flux tubes
 “If and when the kinetic energy of the circulating currents in a part of the
floating flux tube becomes sufficiently high, the flux tube would become
unstable and explode into a solar flare which may be accompanied by a coronal
mass ejection. There is a rapid conversion of the magnetic energy into charged
particle kinetic energy. These high-energy products from the explosion initiate
nuclear as well as elementary particle interactions, some of which have been
detected in laboratories.”
 “Recent NASA and ESA pictures show that the surface of the Sun is covered by
a carpet-like interwoven mesh of magnetic flux tubes of smaller dimensions.*
Some of these smaller structures possess enough magnetic energy to lead to
LENRs through a continual conversion of their energy into particle kinetic
energy. Occurrence of such nuclear processes in a roughly steady state would
account for the solar corona remaining much hotter than the photosphere.”
 “... our picture belies the notion that all nuclear reactions are contained within
the core of the Sun.”
 “On the contrary, it provides strong theoretical support for experimental
anomalies such as short-lived isotopes that have been observed in the spectra
of stars having unusually high average magnetic fields.”
* - idea of small loops in ‘carpet’ is supported by experimental data of H. Peter et al., A&A (2013)

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.561.4239&rep=rep1&type=pdf
“Controlled nucleosynthesis, breakthroughs in experiment and theory”
S. Adamenko (ed.), F. Selleri (ed.), A. van der Merwe (ed.), Springer
Verlag, Dordrecht, The Netherlands ISBN-13: 978-1402058738 (2007)
Tantalizing results in high-current discharge experiments
Metallic target exploded by current pulse exhibits LENR transmutations
Photon spectrum emitted from target similar to astrophysical gamma ray sources

Neutron stars have highest-known average magnetic fields
Typical magnetic field is ~4 x 1012 Gauss - magnetars go up to 1015 Gauss
Thin atmospheres appear to be comprised of partially ionized Hydrogen or Helium
Image credit: Robert Schulze
Neutron-star cross section

Magnetic loops on magnetar SGR 0418 has been hypothesized by ESA scientists
Credit: ESA
Data supports assumption that flux tubes contain protons
Plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes on neutron stars are like coronal loops
Widom-Larsen-Srivastava acceleration physics creates UHE cosmic rays therein
Date: 14 August 2013
Satellite: XMM-Newton
Depicts: Magnetar SGR 0418+5729
Copyright: ESA/ATG medialab
http://sci.esa.int/xmm-newton/52775-magnetar-sgr-04185729-with-a-magnetic-loop/
“The strong internal magnetic field of this magnetar reveals itself only in a small
feature emerging from its surface, where protons absorb some of the X-rays
emitted by the magnetar. The protons are confined in this region by a strong and
localised magnetic field, with lines that are probably shaped like a series of
adjacent arcs, resembling the appearance of loops on the surface of the Sun.”

Plasma-filled coronal loops observed on a magnetar?
Magnetar SGR J1745-2900 shows evidence for magnetic flux tubes
“Additional heating of star surface from currents flowing in twisted magnetic bundle”
Image credit: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss.
“Shows how an extremely rapidly rotating neutron star, which has formed from the
collapse of a very massive star, can produce incredibly powerful magnetic fields.”
http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/449/3/2685.abstract
F. C. Zelati et al.
MRAS 449 pp. 2685 (2015)
“Magnetarnearsupermassiveblack
holedeliverssurprises”May14,2015
http://phys.org/news/2015-05-magnetar-
supermassive-black-hole.html

Plasma-filled coronal loops observed on a magnetar?
Magnetar SGR J1745-2900 shows evidence for magnetic flux tubes
“Corresponds to a charge-separated flow … current is carried by electrons (and ions)”
http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/449/3/2685.abstract
“TheX-rayoutburstoftheGalactic
CentremagnetarSGRJ1745−2900
duringthefirst1.5year”F.C.Zelatietal.
MRAS449pp.2685(2015)

Abstract: “Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence is important in many high-energy
astrophysical systems, where instabilities can amplify the local magnetic field over very
short timescales. Specifically, the magnetorotational instability and dynamo action have
been suggested as a mechanism for the growth of magnetar-strength magnetic fields
(of 1015 gauss and above) and for powering the explosion of a rotating massive star.
Such stars are candidate progenitors of type Ic-bl hypernovae, which make up all
supernovae that are connected to long γ-ray bursts. The magnetorotational instability
has been studied with local high-resolution shearing-box simulations in three
dimensions, and with global two-dimensional simulations, but it is not known whether
turbulence driven by this instability can result in the creation of a large-scale, ordered
and dynamically relevant field. Here we report results from global, three-dimensional,
general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic turbulence simulations. We show that
hydromagnetic turbulence in rapidly rotating protoneutron stars produces an inverse
cascade of energy. We find a large-scale, ordered toroidal field that is consistent with
the formation of bipolar magnetorotationally driven outflows. Our results demonstrate
that rapidly rotating massive stars are plausible progenitors for both type Ic-bl
supernovae and long γ-ray bursts, and provide a viable mechanism for the formation of
magnetars. Moreover, our findings suggest that rapidly rotating massive stars might lie
behind potentially magnetar-powered superluminous supernovae.”
“A large-scale dynamo and magnetoturbulence in rapidly
rotating core-collapse supernovae”
P. Mösta, C. Ott, D. Radice, L. Roberts, E. Schnetter & R. Haas,
Nature 528 pp. 376 - 379 (2015)

Magnetic flux tubes form in rotating massive star collapse
Mösta et al.’s simulation shows huge magnetic field of ~7.0 x 1014 Gauss
W-L-S mechanism accelerates protons to center-of-mass energies ≈ 5.5 x 1018 eV
Assumptions: magnetic flux tube that forms on a rapidly rotating protoneutron star
initially contains protons, electrons, some neutrons, and traces of other elemental
ions if any infalling matter also happens to be present; flux tube that emerged in
Mösta et al. simulation had r = 1.0 km in diameter*, time ∆ t = 10 milliseconds*, and
predicted magnetic field strength of B = 7.0 x 1014 Gauss (7.0 x 1011 kilogauss)
Calculation based on Eq. 20 presuming that flux tube destabilizes and explodes:
Eq. (20) in
* Private communication with an author of Mösta et al.
Λ = c Δ t = (2.998 x 105) x (10 x 10-3 sec) = 29.98 x 102 km ≈ 3.0 x 103 km
B = 7.0 x 1011 kG
πr2 = 3.1416 x (0.5)2 = 3.1416 x 0.25 = 0.7854 km2
eV ≈ [ (30.0) x (7.0 x 1011) ] x (0.7854 / 3.0 x 103) ≈ [ 2.1 x 1013 ] (2.6 x 10-4)
eV ≈ 54.6 x 108 GeV ≈ 5.46 x 109 GeV ≈ 5.46 x 1018 eV ≈ 5.5 x 1018 eV

Magnetic flux tubes predicted to occur on accretion disks
Some probably filled with Hydrogen plasma just like solar coronal loops
Artist’s concept of very hot, luminous Hydrogen-rich accretion disk
surrounding a supermassive black hole with twin plasma jets
Credit: Thomas Müller
Magnetic bridges connecting disk to black hole provide enormous energy source
Credit: Mark Garlick (University of Warwick)
“Active galaxies: a strong magnetic field in the jet base
of a supermassive black hole”
I. Marti-Vidal et al., Science 348 pp. 311-4 (2015)
http://tinyurl.com/psqy25e

Coronal loop analogues could likely occur on accretion disks
“Above inner edge of accretion disk … a magnetic field intensity of 7 x 108 G”
“Production of the large scale superluminal ejections of the
microquasar GRS 1915+105 by violent magnetic reconnection”
E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino and A. Lazarian
Astronomy & Astrophysics 441 pp. 845 - 853 (2005)
http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full/2005/39/aa2590-04/aa2590-04.right.html
E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino and A.
Lazarian E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino and
A. Lazarian

“Jet formation driven by the expansion of magnetic bridges between
the ergosphere and the disk around a rapidly rotating black hole”
S. Koide, T. Kudoh, and K. Shibata
Physical Review D 74 pp. 044005 (2006)
Figure 1.
Concept: magnetic bridges connect disks to black holes
Bridges are unstable and will expand explosively to form powerful jets
Gigantic proton and electron currents circulate inside the loop much akin to Sun

Structures near black hole conducive to W-L-S mechanism
Magnetic B-field strengths could be very high and structures quite large
Fig. 14.22 in “Black hole
astrophysics: the engine paradigm”
David L. Meier, 897 pp. Springer-
Verlag Heidelberg (2012)

Like coronal loop formation on Sun but >>> larger size & magnetic fields
Also see:
“Fast radio bursts and radio
transients from black hole
batteries”
C. Mingarelli et al.
arXiv:1511.02870v1 [astro-ph.HE]
November 9, 2015
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.02870v1.pdf

Plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes emerge from torus surrounding the BH

Many data suggest strong magnetic fields near black holes
W-L-S: 100s of Gauss in very large flux tube provides huge acceleration
“Simple B ∝ r−1 scaling would … provide several hundred Gauss magnetic fields”
Credit: Bill Saxton, NRAO/AUI/NSF
Magnetic field from rotating disk surrounding
supermassive black hole at center of the Milky Way
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v501/n7467/full/nature12499.html
“A strong magnetic field around the supermassive black hole
at the centre of the Galaxy”
R. Eatough et al., Nature 501 pp. 391 - 394 (2013)

Many data suggest strong magnetic fields near black holes
New measurements suggest ordered magnetic fields near event horizons
“Resolved magnetic-field structure and variability near the
event horizon of Sagittarius A* ”
M. Johnson et al., Science 350 pp. 1242 - 1245 (Dec. 4, 2015)
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/350/6265/1242
http://www.astro.phys.s.chiba-u.ac.jp/mhd2005/presentation/y_kato.pdf
Credit: CFA / M. Weiss
Source: Wikipedia

Magnetic flux tubes may form on black hole accretion disks
Magnetic fields of ~7.0 x 108 Gauss develop on upper edge of such disks
Case #1: mechanism accelerates protons to center-of-mass energies ≈2 x 1017 eV
Assumptions: magnetic flux tube forms on supermassive black hole accretion disk
and initially contains protons, electrons, some neutrons, and traces of other
elemental ions if any infalling matter is present; hypothetical flux tube parameters
comparable to those of a similar structure on the Sun, namely that its radius = 104
km and time ∆ t = 102 seconds but much higher magnetic field inside B = 7.0 x 108
Gauss (7.0 x 105 kilogauss) per de Gouveia Dal Pino & Lazarian in A&A (2005)
Eq. (20) in
Λ = c Δ t = (2.998 x 105) x (1 x 102 sec) = 2.998 x 107 km ≈ 3.0 x 107 km
B = 7.0 x 105 kG
πr2 = 3.1416 x (1 x 104)2 = 3.1416 x (1 x 108) ≈ 3.1 x 108 km2
eV ≈ [ (30.0) x (7.0 x 105) ] x (3.1 x 108 / 3.0 x 107) ≈ [ 2.1 x 107 ] x (1.03 x 101)
eV ≈ 2.16 x 108 GeV ≈ 2.16 x 1017 eV ≈ 2.2 x 1017 eV

Magnetic flux tubes may form on black hole accretion disks
Magnetic fields of ~7.0 x 1010 Gauss develop on upper edge of such disks
Case #2: mechanism accelerates protons to center-of-mass energies ≈ .9 x 1019 eV
Assumptions: magnetic flux tube forms on supermassive black hole accretion disk
and initially contains protons, electrons, some neutrons, and traces of other
elemental ions if infalling matter present; in this case flux tube parameters as follows:
radius r = 6.4 x 103 km (same as radius of the earth) and time ∆ t = 102 seconds and its
internal magnetic field averages even higher B = 7.0 x 1010 G while flux tube exists
Eq. (20) in
B = 7.0 x 107 kG
πr2 = 3.1416 x (6.4 x 103)2 = 3.1416 x (41.0 x 106) ≈ 128.8 x 106 ≈ 1.288 x108 km2
eV ≈ [ (30.0) x (7.0 x 107) ] x (1.288 x 108 / 3.0 x 107) ≈ [ 2.1 x 109 ] x (0.43 x 101)
eV ≈ 0.90 x 1010 GeV ≈ 0.9 x 1019 eV

“Magnetic tower” flux tubes may form near black hole jets
Large tube: radius = 106 km, magnetic field = 7 x 108 Gauss, time = 102 s
Widom-Larsen mechanism accelerates protons to mean energies of ~2.0 x 1021 eV
Assumptions: magnetic flux tube develops near base of relativistic jet as it is forming
on a supermassive black hole; tube initially contains mixture of protons, electrons,
some neutrons, and traces of other elemental ions if any infalling matter is present;
in this case, the flux tube’s parameters are as follows: r = 1 x 106 km and time ∆ t = 102
seconds while internal magnetic field B = 7.0 x 108 Gauss (7.0 x 105 kilogauss); these
parameters represent transient values before tube violently destroyed by explosion
Calculation based on Eq. 20 presuming that this flux tube destabilizes and explodes:
Eq. (20) in
B = 7.0 x 105 kG
πr2 = 3.1416 x (1.0 x 106)2 = 3.1416 x (1 x 1012) ≈ 3.14 x 1012 km2
eV ≈ [ (30.0) x (7.0 x 105) ] x (3.14 x 1012 / 3.0 x 107) ≈ [ 21.0 x 106 ] x (1.05 x 105)
eV ≈ 22.05 x 1011 GeV ≈ 2.205 x 1012 GeV ≈ 2.21 x 1021 eV ≈ 2.2 x 1021 eV

 Recent data suggests there may be a hotspot for UHE CRs in direction of Ursa Major
 Our calculations suggest large plasma-filled flux tube structures with extremely high
transient magnetic fields near black holes would be source candidates if data correct
 Thus and per He et al. (2014) might look near hotspot for objects like M82 and Mrk 180
Some data shows hot spot for ultrahigh energy cosmic rays
About 27% of 87 UHE CRs >57 EeV come from 6% of sky near Ursa Major
Are compact objects with ionized H and very high magnetic fields found therein ?
Credit: K. Kawata, University of Tokyo
Institute for Cosmic Ray Research
1 EeV = 1018 eV
“Ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rayhot
spotsfromtidaldisruptionevents”
D.Pfefferetal.arXiv:1512.04959v1
[astro-ph.HE]15Dec2015

TeVCat sky map of H.E.S.S.-discovered gamma ray sources as of July 2012
Colors indicates likely nature of each source
Cosmic ray gamma sources frequent in plane of our galaxy
Very high energy gamma photons are those with energies > 10s of GeVs
Data indicates wide variety of different types of sources for VHE gamma emission
https://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/hfm/HESS/pages/about/physics/
“Supernova remnants (green),
pulsar wind nebulae (violet),
binaries (yellow), star cluster/star
forming regions (blue),
unidentified (grey), starburst
galaxy (orange), active galactic
nucleus (red).”

“It is now recognized that acceleration of particles to very high energies and
the resulting emission of very high energy gamma rays is not a rare
phenomenon, but rather a frequent byproduct of stellar evolution.” H.E.S.S.
Pulsar wind nebulae + unidentified (probably pulsars) = 63%
W-L-S many-body collective mechanism can create gammas >10s of TeVs
https://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/hfm/HESS/pages/about/physics/
Pie chart of high-energy gamma photon sources

Credit: TRACE image of coronal loops in UV
Verydusty
EagleNebula
Gas-antplanets:
Jupiternotfailedstar
Earth:LENRsoccur
inmanyplaces
Planetarylightning
producesneutrons
Nucleosynthesis via W-L-S electroweak neutron production
Not limited to superhot stellar interiors--- very low rates may be common
Collective W-L-S e + p reactions occur on many types of stars, nebulae & planets
Nucleosynthetic process occurs in
photosphere, flux tubes, and corona
W-L-S operates on the Sun
Whitedwarfstars–
don’tsupportfusion
T-Tauristarembedded
Innebulosity
Quark structure of the neutron - credit: Wikipedia

Miley et al. LENR experiments show 5-peak mass spectrum
Is unique signature of ultralow energy neutron capture and beta- decays
Widom & Larsen predict 5-peak mass spectrum with a simple 2-parameter model
“Nuclearabundancesinmetallichydride
electrodesofelectrolyticchemicalcells”
A.WidomandL.Larsen
arXiv:cond-mat/0602472(Feb2006)
ChartpresentsMiley’srawdata;yellowpeaks
andvalleysshowresultsofW-Lneutronoptical
potentialmodelsuperimposedontoMileydata
Product mass-spectrum predicted by W-L model vs. raw data
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0602472v1.pdf
Modelonlygeneratesafive-peakresonantcapture
spectrumatzeromomentumlimit;higherenergy
neutronswillnotproducesameexperimentalresult

 After publishing B2FH in 1957 (which still overshadows astrophysics today, 58
years later), Fowler, both Burbidges, and Hoyle went even further with their
thinking in attempting to better explain anomalous elemental overabundances
spectroscopically measured in the atmospheres of certain “chemically peculiar”
(CP) A and B stars having much-higher-than-normal atmospheric magnetic fields
 Summarizing: to explain anomalous atmospheric abundances in CP stars that
appeared to be inconsistent with ‘core-only’ nucleosynthesis, they proposed
several alternative mechanisms. While no final conclusion was reached, they did
note one (then heretical) possibility (quoting p.430): “We then developed a theory
for the production of anomalous abundances in a thin atmospheric layer by
surface nuclear reactions, the energy for which came from the star’s magnetic
field. We postulated that large fluxes of protons were accelerated in spot regions
in the surface and gave rise both to spallation in the highest levels and to a
neutron flux through (p, n)-reactions lower in the atmosphere, and that these
neutrons were captured to produce the overabundances of the heavy elements.”
Fowler et al. suggested ex-core nucleosynthesis in 1965
In spite of their huge professional stature the paper was and is ignored
“The synthesis and destruction of elements in peculiar stars of Types A and B”
W. Fowler, E. Burbidge, G. Burbidge, and F. Hoyle
The Astrophysical Journal 142 pp. 423 - 450 (1965)
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1965ApJ...142..423F
Astrophysical community believed nucleosynthesis only occurs in stellar cores

Atomic weight A goes from 0 to 200+ on each chart
Adapted Fig. 2 – Fowler et al. (1965) Miley data (1996) with superimposed W-L model
Xe at A~130
(Mizuno expts.)
Hg at A~130
and Pb at ~207
Mn at A~55 , Fe at
~56, and Ni at ~58
Si at A~28
Si at A~28
Mn at A~55 , Fe at ~56,
and Ni at ~58
Xe at A~130
Hg at A~130
and Pb at ~207
Peaks and valleys in Fowler et al. data compared to LENRs
Si at A~28
Fowler et al. Fig. 2: Dashed lines = normal abundances; vertical lines = anomalous abundances
Tantalizing similarity between Fowler, Miley datasets and model’s output
Overabundances observed in CP stars could have some contribution from LENRs
Adapted Fig. 2 – Fowler et al. (1965)
Xe at A~130
(Mizuno expts.)
Hg at A~130
and Pb at ~207
Mn at A~55 , Fe at
~56, and Ni at ~58
Si at A~28
Si at A~28
Mn at A~55 , Fe at ~56,
and Ni at ~58
Xe at A~130
Hg at A~130
and Pb at ~207
Si at A~28 Xe at A~130
(Mizuno expts.)
Hg at A~130
and Pb at ~207
Mn at A~55 , Fe at
~56, and Ni at ~58
Si at A~28
Si at A~28
Mn at A~55 , Fe at ~56,
and Ni at ~58
Xe at A~130
Hg at A~130
and Pb at ~207
Si at A~28
Xe at A~130
(Mizuno expts.)
Mn at A~55 , Fe at
~56, and Ni at ~58
Si at A~28
Mn at A~55 , Fe at
~56, and Ni at ~58
Hg at
A~200 and
Pb at ~207
Quoting from Fowler
et al.’s 1965 APJ
paper: “Dashed lines
represent the normal
abundances, plotted
against atomic weight
A ... Full vertical lines
represent anomalous
abundances...”
Atomic weight A goes from 0 to 200+ on each chart
Effectiveelementalabundance
Hg at
A~200 and
Pb at ~207
Xe at A~130

“Nucleosynthesis by accelerated particles to account for the surface composition
of HD 101065” S. Goriely, Astronomy & Astrophysics 466 pp. 619 - 626 (2007)
 HD 101065 is another name for very chemically peculiar (CP) Przybylski's Star (Ap
class), first discovered by the astronomer Antoni Przybylski in 1961 and discussed
by Fowler et al. (APJ 1965). It has since drawn widespread attention because its
spectra indicate the presence of highly anomalous array of different elements in its
atmosphere, including rare earth elements (REEs) and Actinides; for an older review
article, “HD 101065:Przybylski’s Star,” E. Munoz, J. Crepp, and A. Narayanan see:
http://www2.astro.psu.edu/~ealicea/research/gradschool/przyreport.pdf
 Quoting Goriely: “The mechanisms responsible for exciting roAp stars and other
physical parameters that distinguish them from non pulsating CP stars remain an
open question. The CP stars exhibit a remarkable variety of elemental enhancements
and depletions in their photospheres, sometimes 5 to 6 orders of magnitudes
different than found in the sun (Cowley & Bord 2004) ... Various scenarios have been
suggested to account for the origin of CP stars, including contact binaries that
transfer mass to each other and eventually merge into a single star. However,
quantitatively, the CP-star abundance peculiarities have been explained almost
uniquely on the basis of diffusion processes, i.e. the diffusive segregation of ionic
and isotopic species resulting from the balance between radiative and gravitational
forces within the atmosphere and sub atmospheric regions (Michaud 1970, 2004).”
Chemically peculiar (CP) stars with strong magnetic fields
Goriely proposed that nuclear reactions occur on surface of HD 101065
http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2007/17/aa6583-06.pdf

 “Recent observations suggest the presence of short-lived radioactive elements, such
as Tc, Pm, and 84 ≤ Z ≤ 99 elements, at the surface of the CP roAp star HD 101065,
also known as Przybylski’s star … if confirmed, it can in no way be explained by
diffusion processes. Only nuclear reactions could possibly be responsible for the
synthesis of such short-lived radioelements (in particular, Pm’s longest isotopic half-
life is 17.7 yr) ... large magnetic fields observed in Ap stars (in the case of HD
101065, the magnetic field amounts to B = 2300 G) could be at the origin of a
significant acceleration of charged particles, mainly protons and α-particles, that in
turn can modify the surface content by interaction with the stellar material.”
 Goriely hypothesized that charged particles locally accelerated to high energies by
some unknown mechanism(s) produce neutrons via collision-driven spallation
reactions that can occur with particle irradiation of solar-like materials; these
produced neutrons then capture on elements present in or around HD 101065
 “Due to the exploratory nature of the present study, no effort has been made to
understand the possible mechanisms that could be held responsible for accelerating
the energetic particles. As already discussed, these particles could be locally
accelerated, but they could also come from an external source. A purely parametric
approach is followed by taking the properties of the accelerated proton and α-
particle fluxes as free parameters.” [W-L-S theory provides acceleration mechanism]
Anomalous elements are found in HD 101065’s atmosphere
Neutron-catalyzed nucleosynthesis of elements can explain this data
Need charged particle acceleration mechanism that creates neutron fluxes

 “In this specific scenario, if fluences of [spallation neutrons] the order 1026−27
cm−2 can be achieved, the abundances of the elements heavier than iron can not
only be increased by 5 orders of magnitude, but also the neutron flux becomes
strong enough to bridge the N > 126 α-unstable region between Po and Fr and
produce actinides with a charge as high as Z ~100 in large amounts. This is
essentially due to the high neutron densities of Nn ~1015 cm−3 reached under
these specific conditions ... nuclear flow at an irradiation time greater than some
1000 s is shifted to the neutron-rich side of the valley of stability. This property
has the decisive effect of enabling a significant production of actinides.”
 “From the general study of Sect. 3, the present nucleosynthesis turns out to be
attractive in many respects to explain the abundance estimated at the surface of
the CP star HD 101065. First of all, it can be held responsible for a significant
production of elements heavier than iron by a few orders of magnitude, without
having to call for additional diffusive processes. This nucleosynthesis can be
accompanied by a significant production of radioelements, not only Tc or Pm, but
also Actinides ranging from Po to Fm, at least for the extreme conditions
discussed in Sect. 3.2. ... if we assume that Pm in particular is still present in the
atmosphere of HD 101065, the time elapsed between the nucleosynthesis and the
observation cannot be much longer than a few years … In summary, many
spectroscopic observations of HD 101065 can be met if we assume that
extremely high proton and α-particle fluences have irradiated solar-like material.”
W-L-S e- + p+ reactions can produce neutrons on HD 10165
Theory provides acceleration mechanism and creates fluxes of neutrons

Tatischeff et al. proposed nucleosynthesis in stellar flares
 “The solar-flare gamma-ray line emission testifies that fresh nuclei are
synthesized in abundance in energetic solar events ... Solar-type activity is
believed to be a phenomenon inherent to the vast majority if not all main-
sequence stars. The Sun is not an active star in comparison with numerous stellar
objects in the solar neighbourhood that show much higher luminosities in
emissions associated with coronal and chromospheric activities. Although
gamma-ray line emission from other flaring stars cannot be observed with the
current sensitivity of the gamma-ray space instruments, it is more than likely that
the Sun is not the only star producing surface nucleosynthesis in flares.”
 “Enormous enhancements of accelerated 3He are measured in impulsive solar
flares: the 3He/α ratios found in these events are frequently three to four orders of
magnitude larger than the corresponding value in the solar corona and solar
wind, where 3He/4He ∼5 x 10−4.”
 “Asplund et al. have recently reported the detection of 6Li at ≥ 2σ confidence level
in nine halo stars of low metallicity, [Fe/H] < -1, situated in the turnoff region of
the Hertzsprung-Russel diagram. The 6Li abundances measured in these objects
are far above the value predicted by Big Bang nucleosynthesis and cannot be
explained by galactic cosmic-ray interactions in the interstellar medium either.”
“Nucleosynthesis in stellar flares”
V. Tatischeff, J-P. Thibaud, and I. Ribas arXiv preprint (2008)
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0801/0801.1777v1.pdf
Suggest ex-core nucleosynthesis a la Goriely (2007) & Fowler et al. (1965)

Tatischeff et al. proposed Lithium production in stellar flares
Implies that Big Bang nucleosynthesis is not the sole source of Lithium
 “Tatischeff & Thibaud have shown that a significant amount of 6Li can be produced in
the atmospheres of metal-poor halo stars from repeated solar-like flares during their
main-sequence evolution ... The Li/H ratios measured in these clusters were found to
depend on stellar rotation and activity: the most rapid rotators, which are also the most
active stars in chromospheric and coronal emissions, appear to be the most Li rich...
Li-activity correlation is not well understood.”
 “We assess the possibility that the observed Li-rotation correlation is due to a
significant in situ production of Li by stellar flares in the most active main sequence
stars [and] assume that the Li atoms produced by nonthermal reactions in the
atmosphere of a given star are mainly evacuated by the stellar wind on a relatively
short timescale, rather than being mixed into the bulk of the star convection zone.
Comparison of the solar wind 6Li abundance with calculations of the production of this
isotope in solar flares has shown that this assumption is reasonable for the ... Sun.”
 “We see that the flare contribution to the total Li abundance can be significant for
active stars [and] can explain the non-negligible amounts of Li detected in Pleiades
stars [and] Li abundances in very active stars ... [and] dispersion in Li abundances
observed in young open clusters like the Pleiades and α Persei ... we have shown that
stellar flares could account for significant 6Li production in these objects, thus avoiding
the need for a new pre-galactic source of this isotope, such as non-standard Big Bang
nucleosynthesis and cosmological cosmic rays.”
http://confs.obspm.fr/Blois2007/PresentationsPDF/Tatischeff.pdf

Other data consistent with ex-core stellar nucleosynthesis
Torturous to explain via magnetically-aided chemical diffusion processes
Data shows elemental and abundance anomalies plus great spatial inhomogeneity
“Magnetic Doppler imaging of the chemically peculiar star HD 125248”
N. Rusomarov et al., Astronomy & Astrophysics soon to be published (2016)
“The magnetic field topology and chemical abundance distributions of the
Ap star HD 32633”
J. Silvester et al., MNRAS 453 pp. 2163 - 2176 (2015)
http://www.astro.uu.se/~oleg/papers/hd32633.pdf
“The surface magnetic field and chemical abundance distributions of the B2V
Helium-strong star HD 184927” I. Yakunin et al.
MNRAS 447 pp. 1418 - 1438 (2015)
“A comprehensive analysis of the magnetic standard star HD 94660: host of a
massive compact companion?” J. Bailey et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 575 article #A115 (2015)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.07494v1.pdf /1129/pdf
“Magnetic field topology and chemical spot distributions in the extreme Ap star
HD 75049” O. Kochukhov et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 574 article #A79 (2014)

Ex-core nucleosynthesis at very low rates may be common
Plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes occur on many different types of stars
Credit: CSIRO - Australia Telescope National Facility
Red
dwarfs
Sun
White
dwarfs

Credit: NRAO/AUI/NSF - Dana Berry SkyWorks
Plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes exist on red dwarf stars
Red dwarfs are longest-lived and comprise 75 - 80% of stars in galaxy
Energetic particle production and LENR nucleosynthesis occur in atmospheres
“Artist's impression
of red dwarf star
TVLM 513-46546.
ALMA observations
suggest that it has
an amazingly
powerful magnetic
field (shown by the
blue lines),
potentially
associated with a
flurry of solar-flare-
like eruptions.”
https://public.nrao.edu/news/pressreleases/alma-dwarf-star-2015
http://www.almaobservatory.org/images/newsreleases/151119-the-first-
millimeter-detection-of-a-non-accreting-ultracool-dwarfpaper.pdf

Plasma-filled magnetic flux tubes exist on red dwarf stars
Red dwarfs are most common and longest-lived stars in the Milky Way
Energetic particle acceleration and LENR nucleosynthesis occurs in atmospheres
https://public.nrao.edu/news/pressreleases/alma-dwarf-star-2015
http://www.almaobservatory.org/images/newsreleases/151119-the-first-
millimeter-detection-of-a-non-accreting-ultracool-dwarfpaper.pdf

Credit: Pascalou Petit
Surface magnetic field of young
T Tauri-type star named SU Aur
“Tauri star is a type of pre–main sequence star that is being heated through
gravitational contraction and has not yet begun to burn hydrogen at its core.
They are variable stars that are magnetically active. The magnetic field of these
stars is thought to interact with its strong stellar wind, transferring angular
momentum to the surrounding protoplanetary disk.” Source: Wikipedia
Several types of younger, smaller stars may burn Lithium
LENR Lithium cycle produces ~ same products as P-P Lithium burning
LENRs
Fusion reactions
T Tauri stars undoubtedly
have coronal loops
Reactions have been demonstrated in
laboratory experiments

W-L-S theory can explain Lithium anomalies in certain stars
U.S. government observed equivalent anomalies in LENR experiments
“Wide spread of Lithium abundances for physically similar stars is one of the
enigmas of modern astrophysics” - Polosukhina et al. (2011)
“Lithium and isotopic ratio 6Li/7Li in magnetic roAp stars as an indicator of
active processes” N. Polosukhina et al., Magnetic Stars pp. 382 - 389 (2011)
https://www.sao.ru/Doc-en/Science/Public/Conf/magstars-2010/p382.pdf
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-us-government-labs-
reported-clearcut-neutron-capture-data-from-pf-cells-in-oct-1989-may-13-2015
“Lithium in roAp stars with strong magnetic fields”
N. Polosukhina et al., Mem. S.A.It. Suppl. 22 pp. 129 - 136 (2012)
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2012MSAIS..22..129P
“Abnormal Lithium abundance in several Ap-Bp stars”
A. Shavrina et al., arXiv: 1304.4175v1 [astro-ph.SR] (15 Apr 2013)
Slide #19: data reported through Edward Teller of Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory at a 1989 EPRI-NSF workshop described LLNL experiments in which
significant depletion of Lithium-6 was observed on cathodes in electrochemical cells

Algol B has plasma-filled coronal loop magnetic structures
“Are Algol’s coronal loop structures common to active binaries?”
Three-star system: Algol B is yellow G8IV subgiant star close to Algol A
http://www.slideserve.com/robbin/sub-milliarcsecond-astrometry-of-the-algol-system
Credit: W. Peterson et al.
Direct imaging of a coronal loop on Algol B
W.PetersonandR.Mutel(Univ.ofIowa,
M.Goss(NRAO),andM.Gudel(ETH,Zurich)
“Sub-millisecondastrometryoftheAlgol
system”
A
B

Discharges inside Eyjafjallajökull volcano’s dust cloud in Iceland (2010)
e-* + p+ g n + νe
Planetary atmospheres and presolar nebula have lightning
LENR nucleosynthesis can occur in
dusty lightning discharges
Laura 13

June 3, 2011 Copyright 2011, Lattice Energy LLC All Rights
Reserved 80
 Lattice’s speculative conjecture: thanks to various interplanetary probes, it is now
well known that substantial violent lighting activity occurs in the atmospheres of
Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, and to a much lesser degree, Uranus. It is also well-known
that their atmospheres are all rich in Hydrogen in various forms and contain variable
quantities of dust --- thus, they possess all the necessary ingredients for the LENR
nucleosynthetic mechanism. It is also well known that Jupiter radiates ~2.7 times as
much energy as it receives from the Sun; Saturn ~3.0x; Neptune ~2.7x; and Uranus
~1.0x. Are LENR processes contributing to such excess thermal energy production?
 Up until now, most of us (Lattice included) have thought in terms of there being a
sharp line of demarcation between “stars” and “planets,” stars being where fusion-
driven nucleosynthesis takes place and planets where almost entirely chemical
processes occur. Given the possibility of LENRs, that old idea may require revision
 Viewed through that long-standing conceptual paradigm, Jupiter and like gas-giant
planets were regarded by many as “failed stars.” Perhaps there exists a continuum
of heat-producing objects between radiologically dead rocky planets and stars that
are hot enough to support nuclear fusion processes --- the middle-ground being
occupied by nucleosynthetically dynamic objects with increasing amounts of LENRs
taking place in them. Maybe Jupiter, Saturn, and “brown dwarfs” really didn’t fail?
LENRs occur in lightning with embedded dust & aerosols
Intense lightning activity observed in gas giant planetary atmospheres
Could lightning-driven nucleosynthesis produce heat and isotopic anomalies ?

Chemical fractionation cannot explain Genesis Mission data
“Solar composition from the Genesis Discovery Mission”
D. Burnett and the Genesis Science Team
PNAS Early Edition doi:10.1073/pnas.1014877108 (2011)
“Several well studied natural processes exist which fractionate isotopes relative to the
assumed Standard Model values, but none of these explain the variations shown on Fig. 3.”
Quoting: “Fig. 3. A mass spectrometer measures
separately the ion currents for the different isotopes of
an element. Oxygen has three isotopes, allowing two
isotopic abundance ratios to be calculated.
Intersample variations are calculated as the fractional
deviation δ of the measured 18O∕16O or 17O∕16O from
terrestrial ocean water (‰ units are permil, parts in
1,000). Terrestrial geochemical processes produce a
wide range in O [Oxygen] isotope fractionations, but
these variations lie almost entirely on the line labeled
TF (terrestrial fractionation). The Genesis solar wind
composition (8) is very different from the major inner
solar system objects (Earth, Moon, Mars) and most
asteroidal (meteoritic) materials, but lies close to the
trend set by unique high temperature Ca-Al-rich
inclusions (CAI). Theoretically, solar wind acceleration
fractionates isotopes by the amount shown by the line
between the solar wind and the Sun? point (9).”
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/05/05/1014877108.full.pdf
Figure 3. Burnett et al. (2011)

Astrophysical/geochemical paradigms may require revision
LENRs explain certain isotopic anomalies that are otherwise inexplicable
 Lattice comments: present astrophysical and geochemical paradigms
assume that fresh local nucleosynthesis of elements/isotopes (out
beyond the photosphere of early solar system's protosun) must have
effectively ceased prior to condensation of materials comprising the
primordial presolar nebula into a myriad of various-sized solid bodies,
prior to Earth becoming recognizable as a fully-formed rocky planet
 Under older now-dominant paradigm, only unstable radioactive isotopes
with very long half-lives, e.g., progenies of the U-series, Th-series, and
40K, would exist long-enough to still be producing radiogenic heat inside
planetary bodies comprising today’s modern solar system
 If one grants the possibility that LENR nucleosynthesis can occur (albeit
at vastly lower aggregate reaction rates compared to what occurs inside
hot stellar cores or supernovas) outside of Sun’s inner core as well as
elsewhere in the solar system of today, then many of the very puzzling
isotopic anomalies revealed in the Genesis Discovery Mission’s data ---
that are inexplicable with present theories of chemical fractionation
processes --- might be better understood by utilizing LENR processes to
explain indigenous element production and related isotopic ratios

Importance of electroweak reactionsArtist'simpressionshowssurroundingsofsupermassiveblackhole
Credit:ESO/L.Calçada
“Neither of these two great theories [QCD and QED], however,
incorporates processes whereby protons transform into neutrons
and vice-versa. How can we account for them? To explain these
events, physicists had to define one more force in addition to
those of gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong force.
This new addition, the fourth force, is called the weak force. The
weak force completes our current picture of physics: the Core.
Life on Earth is powered by a tiny fraction of the energy released
from the Sun, captured as sunlight. The Sun derives its power by
burning protons into neutrons, releasing energy. The weak force,
in this very specific sense, makes life possible.”
“These [various weak force reactions] give rise to many forms of
nuclear decay (radioactivities), destabilize other hadrons, and
drive many transformations in cosmology and astrophysics
(including the synthesis of all the chemical elements, starting
from a primordial mix of protons and neutrons).
Frank Wilczek, “A beautiful question” (2015)

Selected references - 1
Many-body collective effects accelerate particles in magnetic flux tubes
“Ultra low momentum neutron catalyzed nuclear reactions on metallic
hydride surfaces”
A. Widom and L. Larsen
European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields 46 pp. 107 - 112 (2006)
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/widom-and-larsen-ulm-neutron-
catalyzed-lenrs-on-metallic-hydride-surfacesepjc-march-2006
Cornell physics preprint arXiv:nucl-th/0804.2647v1 4 pages (2008)
“Large-scale dynamo and magnetoturbulence in rapidly rotating core-
collapse supernovae”
P. Mösta et al.
Nature doi:10.1038/nature15755 (published online November 30, 2015)
“A primer for electro-weak induced low energy nuclear reactions”
Y. Srivastava, A. Widom, and L. Larsen
Pramana - Journal of Physics 75 pp. 617 - 637 (2010) - author’s copy below
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/srivastava-widom-and-larsenprimer-for-
electroweak-induced-low-energy-nuclear-reactionspramana-oct-2010
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature15755.html
Condensed
matter
Condensed
matter

Many-body collective effects accelerate particles in magnetic flux tubes
“High-energy cosmic rays and the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuz’ min effect”
A. Watson
Reports on progress in physics 77 pp. 036901 (2014)
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1310/1310.0325.pdf
“Structure of solar coronal loops: from miniature to large-scale”
H. Peter et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 556 pp. A104 12 pp. (2013)
http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2013/08/aa21826-13.pdf
“How big can a black hole grow”
A. King
arXiv:1511.08502v2 [astro-ph.GA] (December 9, 2015)
“The quasar accretion disk size - black hole mass relation”
C. Morgan et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 712 pp. 1129 - 1136 (2010)
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1129/pdf
“Magnetic reconnection in extreme astrophysical environments”
D. Uzdensky
38th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Bremen, Germany, p.2, July 18-15, 2010

“X-ray emission from the giant magnetosphere of the magnetic O-type star NGC
1624-2”
V. Petit et al.
MNRAS 453 pp. 3288 - 3299 (2015)
http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/453/3/3288.full.pdf
“Magnetorotational instability in hypermassive relativistic neutron stars”
D. Siegel et al.
Physical Review D 87 pp. 121302 (2013)
“Magnetic Hydrogen atmosphere models and the neutron star RX J1856.5-3754”
W. Ho et al.
MNRAS 357 pp. 821 - 830 (2007)
http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/375/3/821.full.pdf+html
https://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/445/3/2777.full.pdf+html
“Magnetic field configurations of a magnetar throughout its interior and exterior –
core, crust, and magnetosphere ”
K. Fujisawa and S. Kisaka
MNRAS 445 pp. 2777 - 2793 (2014)
“Ultra high energy cosmic rays: the highest energy frontier”
Joao R. T. de Mello Neto
arXiv:1510.05629v1 [astro-ph.HE] (October 19, 2015)

“Cosmic ray origin: lessons from ultra-high-energy cosmic rays and the
galactic/extragalactic transition”
E. Parizot
Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplement 256 - 257 pp. 197 - 212 (2014)
“Superbubbles and energetic particles in the galaxy”
E. Parizot et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 424 pp. 747 - 760 (2004)
http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2004/36/aa1269.pdf
“ ‘Expresso’ acceleration of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays”
D. Caprioli
The Astrophysical Journal Letters 811 pp. L-38 (2015)
“The strongest magnetic fields in the Universe: how strong can they become”
R. Treumann et al.
Frontiers in Physics 2:59. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2014.00059 (2014)
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphy.2014.00059/full
“Cosmogenic neutrinos and ultra-high energy cosmic ray models”
R. Aloisio et al.
arXiv:1505.04020v3 [astro-ph.HE] (October 6, 2015)
http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2004/36/aa1269.pdf

“Index to key concepts and documents”
v. #20 updated and revised through Jan. 8, 2015
L. Larsen, Lattice Energy LLC, May 28, 2013
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-index-to-documents-re-
widomlarsen-theory-of-lenrsmay-28-2013
“Scalability of LENR power generation systems”
L. Larsen, Lattice Energy LLC, November 29, 2015
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-scalability-of-lenr-power-
generation-systems-nov-29-2015
“Toyota confirmed Mitsubishi’s LENR transmutation results”
L. Larsen, Lattice Energy LLC, October 31, 2013
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-toyota-confirms-mitsubishi-
transmutation-of-cs-to-proct-31-2013
Lattice’s Index provides comprehensive guide to info about W-L-S theory
“A beautiful question – finding Nature’s deep design”
Frank Wilczek (MIT) Penguin Press - New York 448 pp. (2015)
http://www.amazon.com/Beautiful-Question-Finding-Natures-Design/dp/1594205264
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/aug/01/a-beautiful-question-natures-deep-
design-frank-wilczek-review

Lattice Energy LLC - Many body collective magnetic mechanism creates ultrahigh energy cosmic rays - Jan 1 2016

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Lattice Energy LLC - Many body collective magnetic mechanism creates ultrahigh energy cosmic rays - Jan 1 2016 (20)

More from Lewis Larsen (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Lattice Energy LLC - Many body collective magnetic mechanism creates ultrahigh energy cosmic rays - Jan 1 2016