SlideShare a Scribd company logo
5
Most read
Lecture 12


Group Velocity and Phase Velocity


       Many modern ideas on wave propagation originated in the famous works of Lord

Raleigh, and the problems we intend to discuss are no exception to this rule. The

distinction between phase velocity and group velocity appears very early in Rayleigh’s

papers. The problem is discussed in particular in connection with measurements of the

velocity of light and this is a place where a curious error was introduced regarding the

angle of aberration.

       Let us recall that the usual velocity of waves is defined as giving the phase

difference between the vibrations observed at two different points in a free plane wave. A

wave



ψ = A cos ( k <x − ω t ) ,

                                        ˆ
                                        k
travels with a phase velocity v p = ω     .
                                        k

Another velocity can be defined, if we consider the propagation of a peculiarity (to use

Rayleigh’s term), that is, of a change of amplitude impressed on a train of waves.

This is what we now call a modulation impressed on a carrier. The modulation results in

the building up of some “groups” of large amplitude (Rayleigh) which move along with

the group velocity U. In wave mechanics, Schrodinger called these groups “wave

packets.” A simple combination of groups obtains when we superimpose on one plane




                                                                                         1
wave another plane wave with slightly different phase velocity and frequency such that

we have



        cos ( k.x − ω t ) + cos ª( k + δ k ) .x − (ω + δ ω ) t º
                                ¬                              ¼
                ª ( k.x − ω t ) + {( k + δ k ) .x − (ω + δ ω ) t} º
        = 2 cos «                                                 »
                «
                ¬                        2                        »
                                                                  ¼
                ª ( k.x − ω t ) − {( k + δ k ) .x − (ω + δ ω ) t} º
            cos «                                                 »
                «
                ¬                        2                        »
                                                                  ¼
                ª§     δk·       §     δω · º       §δ k      δω ·
        = 2 cos «¨ k +    ¸ .x − ¨ ω +    ¸ t » cos ¨    .x −    t¸ ,
                ¬©      2 ¹      ©      2 ¹ ¼       © 2        2 ¹


where the first term corresponds to a carrier wave and the second term corresponds to the
modulation envelope. Thus the superposition results in a carrier wave propagating with a
phase velocity


                                          §           ˆ
                                               δω · k '
                                    v p = ¨ω +    ¸       ,
                                          ©     2 ¹    δk
                                                    k+
                                                        2
where
                                       §    δk·
                                       ¨k +    ¸
                                             2 ¹
                                   k'= ©
                                   ˆ             .
                                            δk
                                         k+
                                             2
and a modulation envelope propagating with a group velocity


                                           δω ˆ
                                    vg =      k" ,
                                           δk
where

                                   ˆ   δk
                                   k"=    .
                                       δk
In three dimensions the group velocity therefore becomes


                                                                                       2
δω        δω        δω
                              v g = x1
                                    ˆ         + x2
                                                ˆ       + x1
                                                          ˆ       .
                                         δ k1      δ k2      δ k3


This expression is convenient to use if the dispersion relation is given explicitly as
       b           g
ω = f k1 , k 2 , k 3 .




However from Christoffel equation we have seen that the dispersion relation can be
obtained in the following implicit form



                                     ()
                              k 2Γ ij l − ρω 2 = Ω (ω , k1, k2 , k3 ) = 0 .
                                      ˆ


                                           e      j
where l is the propagation direction l ≡ k . The above equation cannot always be

transformed to get an explicit form for ω as a function of wave number. In such cases
the required derivatives are obtained by implicit differentiation. For example, from the
above equation, we have


                              § ∂Ω      ∂Ω       ·
                              ¨    δω +     δ k1 ¸ = 0 ,
                              © ∂ω      ∂k1      ¹ k 2 k3
                              § ∂ω ·       ∂Ω ∂k1
                              ¨     ¸ =−          ,...etc.
                              © ∂k1 ¹k2 k3 ∂Ω ∂ω




                                                                                      3
Thus the group velocity can always be evaluated as


                                         ∇k Ω
                               vg = −         ,
                                        ∂Ω ∂ω


where the gradient of Ω is taken with respect to k.


                     In loss less medium it can be shown that v e = v g .


This provides us with an alternative and simpler way to compute ray velocity/group
velocity surfaces, which we describe below.
       Recall that


                                     b g b        g b g
                               Ω = Ω k , ω = Ω ωp, ω = F p, ω ,
                                              F ∂p I 1
                               ∇ Ω = ∇ F = ∇ FG J = ∇ F .
                                 k       k
                                              H ∂k K ω
                                                  p             p




Also we can write


        ∂Ω         ∂p           § k ·      1
           = ∇ pF.    = ∇ p F . ¨ − 2 ¸ = − p.∇ p F .
        ∂ω         ∂ω           © ω ¹      ω


Therefore,


                                      1
                                        ∇pF      ∇ F
                               vg = − ω        = p      .
                                      1         p.∇ p F
                                     − p.∇ p F
                                      ω


or, in terms of the slowness vector, the group velocity can be written as




                                                                                4
∇p F         1    n      n
                              vg =             =             =     .
                                     p. ∇p F               b g
                                                   p cos p, n p. n

where n is the unit normal to the slowness surface. Thus the group velocity has the same
meaning as the energy velocity (normal to the slowness surface).


       The relation between group velocity, phase velocity and the slowness surface can
be shown as follows:




                                                                 Phase Velocity Surface




                                 n
                                                                       Phase velocity vector
                                                                       normal to the group
                                                                       velocity surface
p
                                                                       p




                Slowness Surface                                       Group Velocity Surface
                                                                       (lines of constant phase are
                                                                       tangent to this surface)




Note

                                                   1
                                        vp =         p ,
                                                   p
                                                n                                              5
                                        vg =        .
                                               p. n

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

PDF
The navier stokes equations
Springer
 
PDF
Paolo Creminelli "Dark Energy after GW170817"
SEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Lewenz_McNairs-copy
Anna Lewenz
 
PDF
Quantum Interrogation: Interaction-Free Determination of Existence (Physics 1...
BenjaminKan4
 
PDF
Meanshift Tracking Presentation
sandtouch
 
PPTX
Joint variation solve problem
Maris Ganace
 
PDF
Formulation of seismic passive resistance of non
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
11.formulation of seismic passive resistance of non
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
3 151010205457-lva1-app6892
Ranjeet Kumar
 
PDF
Solucionario Mecácnica Clásica Goldstein
Fredy Mojica
 
PDF
6161103 11.7 stability of equilibrium
etcenterrbru
 
DOCX
Primer for ordinary differential equations
Tarun Gehlot
 
PDF
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
Lilyana Vankova
 
PDF
Draft classical feynmangraphs higgs
foxtrot jp R
 
PDF
Lecture notes 03
Yakup Kocaman
 
PPT
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_i
Abhijeet Dash
 
PDF
Causal csa
Emanuel Emanuel
 
PDF
Spectral properties of the Goldstino in supersymmetric Bose-Fermi mixtures
Daisuke Satow
 
PDF
Heatequationincfd
Parhamsagharchi
 
PDF
Message Passing
Yap Wooi Hen
 
The navier stokes equations
Springer
 
Paolo Creminelli "Dark Energy after GW170817"
SEENET-MTP
 
Lewenz_McNairs-copy
Anna Lewenz
 
Quantum Interrogation: Interaction-Free Determination of Existence (Physics 1...
BenjaminKan4
 
Meanshift Tracking Presentation
sandtouch
 
Joint variation solve problem
Maris Ganace
 
Formulation of seismic passive resistance of non
Alexander Decker
 
11.formulation of seismic passive resistance of non
Alexander Decker
 
3 151010205457-lva1-app6892
Ranjeet Kumar
 
Solucionario Mecácnica Clásica Goldstein
Fredy Mojica
 
6161103 11.7 stability of equilibrium
etcenterrbru
 
Primer for ordinary differential equations
Tarun Gehlot
 
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
Lilyana Vankova
 
Draft classical feynmangraphs higgs
foxtrot jp R
 
Lecture notes 03
Yakup Kocaman
 
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_i
Abhijeet Dash
 
Causal csa
Emanuel Emanuel
 
Spectral properties of the Goldstino in supersymmetric Bose-Fermi mixtures
Daisuke Satow
 
Heatequationincfd
Parhamsagharchi
 
Message Passing
Yap Wooi Hen
 

Viewers also liked (18)

PDF
An 1109
Bipin Kujur
 
PDF
Accounting issues in mining industries ey
Helvry Sinaga
 
PDF
An 849
Bipin Kujur
 
PDF
An 0971
Bipin Kujur
 
PDF
Enterprise presentation
Metamation
 
PPTX
ödev vize
gokturk01
 
PPSX
Seller Presentation Presented by Tina Pavlov
Tina Pavlov
 
PDF
Module 9 setting up the pcb
Bipin Kujur
 
PDF
Mit6 007 s11_lec20
Bipin Kujur
 
PDF
3 electromagneticwaves
Bipin Kujur
 
PPSX
No a les retallades
ahrmass
 
PDF
Mt 084
Bipin Kujur
 
PPTX
Sm final presentation 04 02-12
Scott Krause | PMP
 
PDF
MetaCAM Enterprise Brochure
Metamation
 
PDF
Th writing-grammar-mistakes-140501125825-phpapp01
Bipin Kujur
 
PDF
Design rules reference
Bipin Kujur
 
PPTX
Sponsorluk
gokturk01
 
PDF
Logic families
Bipin Kujur
 
An 1109
Bipin Kujur
 
Accounting issues in mining industries ey
Helvry Sinaga
 
An 849
Bipin Kujur
 
An 0971
Bipin Kujur
 
Enterprise presentation
Metamation
 
ödev vize
gokturk01
 
Seller Presentation Presented by Tina Pavlov
Tina Pavlov
 
Module 9 setting up the pcb
Bipin Kujur
 
Mit6 007 s11_lec20
Bipin Kujur
 
3 electromagneticwaves
Bipin Kujur
 
No a les retallades
ahrmass
 
Mt 084
Bipin Kujur
 
Sm final presentation 04 02-12
Scott Krause | PMP
 
MetaCAM Enterprise Brochure
Metamation
 
Th writing-grammar-mistakes-140501125825-phpapp01
Bipin Kujur
 
Design rules reference
Bipin Kujur
 
Sponsorluk
gokturk01
 
Logic families
Bipin Kujur
 
Ad

Similar to Lecture12 (20)

PDF
[Vvedensky d.] group_theory,_problems_and_solution(book_fi.org)
Dabe Milli
 
PDF
Ck31369376
IJMER
 
DOCX
1 d wave equation
NEERAJ PARMAR
 
PDF
Switkes01200543268
Hitesh Wagle
 
PDF
Polarons in bulk and near surfaces
nirupam12
 
PDF
Cosmin Crucean: Perturbative QED on de Sitter Universe.
SEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Sheet1 simplified
marwan a
 
PPTX
Physics activity
Swarup Kumar Boro
 
PDF
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
theijes
 
PDF
Capítulo 34 (5th edition) con soluciones ondas electromagneticas serway
.. ..
 
PDF
Sect5 4
inKFUPM
 
PDF
Hw2 s
Nick Nick
 
PDF
Engr 213 midterm 2b sol 2010
akabaka12
 
PDF
GATE - Physics - 2006
SNS
 
PPT
Calculus of variations
sauravpatkotwar
 
DOC
Chapter 3 (maths 3)
Prathab Harinathan
 
PDF
A new approach to constants of the motion and the helmholtz conditions
Alexander Decker
 
DOCX
1 d heat equation
NEERAJ PARMAR
 
PDF
What happens when the Kolmogorov-Zakharov spectrum is nonlocal?
Colm Connaughton
 
PDF
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is publis...
researchinventy
 
[Vvedensky d.] group_theory,_problems_and_solution(book_fi.org)
Dabe Milli
 
Ck31369376
IJMER
 
1 d wave equation
NEERAJ PARMAR
 
Switkes01200543268
Hitesh Wagle
 
Polarons in bulk and near surfaces
nirupam12
 
Cosmin Crucean: Perturbative QED on de Sitter Universe.
SEENET-MTP
 
Sheet1 simplified
marwan a
 
Physics activity
Swarup Kumar Boro
 
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
theijes
 
Capítulo 34 (5th edition) con soluciones ondas electromagneticas serway
.. ..
 
Sect5 4
inKFUPM
 
Hw2 s
Nick Nick
 
Engr 213 midterm 2b sol 2010
akabaka12
 
GATE - Physics - 2006
SNS
 
Calculus of variations
sauravpatkotwar
 
Chapter 3 (maths 3)
Prathab Harinathan
 
A new approach to constants of the motion and the helmholtz conditions
Alexander Decker
 
1 d heat equation
NEERAJ PARMAR
 
What happens when the Kolmogorov-Zakharov spectrum is nonlocal?
Colm Connaughton
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is publis...
researchinventy
 
Ad

Lecture12

  • 1. Lecture 12 Group Velocity and Phase Velocity Many modern ideas on wave propagation originated in the famous works of Lord Raleigh, and the problems we intend to discuss are no exception to this rule. The distinction between phase velocity and group velocity appears very early in Rayleigh’s papers. The problem is discussed in particular in connection with measurements of the velocity of light and this is a place where a curious error was introduced regarding the angle of aberration. Let us recall that the usual velocity of waves is defined as giving the phase difference between the vibrations observed at two different points in a free plane wave. A wave ψ = A cos ( k <x − ω t ) , ˆ k travels with a phase velocity v p = ω . k Another velocity can be defined, if we consider the propagation of a peculiarity (to use Rayleigh’s term), that is, of a change of amplitude impressed on a train of waves. This is what we now call a modulation impressed on a carrier. The modulation results in the building up of some “groups” of large amplitude (Rayleigh) which move along with the group velocity U. In wave mechanics, Schrodinger called these groups “wave packets.” A simple combination of groups obtains when we superimpose on one plane 1
  • 2. wave another plane wave with slightly different phase velocity and frequency such that we have cos ( k.x − ω t ) + cos ª( k + δ k ) .x − (ω + δ ω ) t º ¬ ¼ ª ( k.x − ω t ) + {( k + δ k ) .x − (ω + δ ω ) t} º = 2 cos « » « ¬ 2 » ¼ ª ( k.x − ω t ) − {( k + δ k ) .x − (ω + δ ω ) t} º cos « » « ¬ 2 » ¼ ª§ δk· § δω · º §δ k δω · = 2 cos «¨ k + ¸ .x − ¨ ω + ¸ t » cos ¨ .x − t¸ , ¬© 2 ¹ © 2 ¹ ¼ © 2 2 ¹ where the first term corresponds to a carrier wave and the second term corresponds to the modulation envelope. Thus the superposition results in a carrier wave propagating with a phase velocity § ˆ δω · k ' v p = ¨ω + ¸ , © 2 ¹ δk k+ 2 where § δk· ¨k + ¸ 2 ¹ k'= © ˆ . δk k+ 2 and a modulation envelope propagating with a group velocity δω ˆ vg = k" , δk where ˆ δk k"= . δk In three dimensions the group velocity therefore becomes 2
  • 3. δω δω δω v g = x1 ˆ + x2 ˆ + x1 ˆ . δ k1 δ k2 δ k3 This expression is convenient to use if the dispersion relation is given explicitly as b g ω = f k1 , k 2 , k 3 . However from Christoffel equation we have seen that the dispersion relation can be obtained in the following implicit form () k 2Γ ij l − ρω 2 = Ω (ω , k1, k2 , k3 ) = 0 . ˆ e j where l is the propagation direction l ≡ k . The above equation cannot always be transformed to get an explicit form for ω as a function of wave number. In such cases the required derivatives are obtained by implicit differentiation. For example, from the above equation, we have § ∂Ω ∂Ω · ¨ δω + δ k1 ¸ = 0 , © ∂ω ∂k1 ¹ k 2 k3 § ∂ω · ∂Ω ∂k1 ¨ ¸ =− ,...etc. © ∂k1 ¹k2 k3 ∂Ω ∂ω 3
  • 4. Thus the group velocity can always be evaluated as ∇k Ω vg = − , ∂Ω ∂ω where the gradient of Ω is taken with respect to k. In loss less medium it can be shown that v e = v g . This provides us with an alternative and simpler way to compute ray velocity/group velocity surfaces, which we describe below. Recall that b g b g b g Ω = Ω k , ω = Ω ωp, ω = F p, ω , F ∂p I 1 ∇ Ω = ∇ F = ∇ FG J = ∇ F . k k H ∂k K ω p p Also we can write ∂Ω ∂p § k · 1 = ∇ pF. = ∇ p F . ¨ − 2 ¸ = − p.∇ p F . ∂ω ∂ω © ω ¹ ω Therefore, 1 ∇pF ∇ F vg = − ω = p . 1 p.∇ p F − p.∇ p F ω or, in terms of the slowness vector, the group velocity can be written as 4
  • 5. ∇p F 1 n n vg = = = . p. ∇p F b g p cos p, n p. n where n is the unit normal to the slowness surface. Thus the group velocity has the same meaning as the energy velocity (normal to the slowness surface). The relation between group velocity, phase velocity and the slowness surface can be shown as follows: Phase Velocity Surface n Phase velocity vector normal to the group velocity surface p p Slowness Surface Group Velocity Surface (lines of constant phase are tangent to this surface) Note 1 vp = p , p n 5 vg = . p. n