LOWER EXTREMITY TRAUMA
By….
Dr. Muhammad Salman Khan
Lower Extremity Trauma
 Hip Fractures / Dislocations
 Femur Fractures
 Patella Fractures
 Knee Dislocations
 Tibia Fractures
 Ankle Fractures
Hip Fractures
 Hip Dislocations
 Femoral Head Fractures
 Femoral Neck Fractures
 Intertrochanteric Fractures
 Subtrochanteric Fractures
Epidemiology
 250,000 Hip fractures annually
 Expected to double by 2050
 At risk populations
 Elderly: poor balance & vision, osteoporosis,
inactivity, medications, malnutrition
 Young: high energy trauma
Hip Dislocations
 Significant trauma, usually MVA
 Posterior: Hip flexion, Hip Internally
Rotated & Adducted
 Anterior: Limb in Flexion, External
Rotation, Abduction
Hip Dislocations
 EmergentTreatment: Closed Reduction
 Dislocated hip is an emergency
 Goal is to reduce risk of Avascular Necrosis and
Degenrative Joint Disease
 Allows restoration of flow through occluded or
compressed vessels
 Literature supports decreasedAVN with earlier
reduction
 Requires proper anesthesia
 Requires “team” (i.e. more than one person)
Hip Dislocations
 EmergentTreatment: Closed Reduction
 General anesthesia with muscle relaxation facilitates
reduction, but is not necessary
 Conscious sedation is acceptable
 Attempts at reduction with inadequate analgesia/
sedation will cause unnecessary pain, cause muscle
spasm, and make subsequent attempts at reduction
more difficult
Hip Dislocations
 EmergentTreatment: Closed
Reduction
 Allis Maneuver
 Assistant stabilizes pelvis with
pressure on Ant. Sup. Iliac
Spine
 Surgeon stands on stretcher
and gently flexes hip to 90deg,
applies progressively
increasing traction to the
extremity with gentle
adduction and internal rotation
 Reduction can often be seen
and felt
Insert hip
Reduction
Picture
Hip Dislocations
 Following Closed Reduction
 Check stability of hip to 90deg flexion
 Repeat X Ray Pelvis AP
 Judet views of pelvis (if acetabulum fx)
 CT scan with thin cuts through acetabulum
 Remains of bony fragments within hip joint (indication
for emergentOR trip to remove incarcerated fragment of
bone)
Femoral Head Fractures
 Concurrent with hip dislocation due to shear
injury
Femoral Head Fractures
 Pipkin Classification
 I: Fracture inferior to fovea
 II: Fracture superior to fovea
 III: Femoral head + acetabulum fracture
 IV: Femoral head + femoral neck fracture
Femoral Head Fractures
 Treatment Options
 Type I
 Nonoperative: non-displaced
 ORIF if displaced
 Type II: ORIF
 Type III: ORIF of both fractures
 Type IV: ORIF vs. hemiarthroplasty
Femoral Neck Fractures
 Garden Classification
 I Valgus impacted
 II Non-displaced
 III Complete: Partially
Displaced
 IV Complete: Fully
Displaced
 Functional
Classification
 Stable (I/II)
 Unstable (III/IV)
I II
III IV
Femoral Neck Fractures
 Treatment Options
 Non-operative
 Very limited role
 Activity modification
 Skeletal traction
 Operative
 ORIF
 Hemiarthroplasty (Endoprosthesis)
 Total Hip Replacement
ORIF
Hemi
THR
Femoral Neck Fractures
 Young Patients
 UrgentORIF (<6hrs)
 Elderly Patients
 ORIF possible (higher risk AVN, non-union, and
failure of fixation)
 Hemiarthroplasty
 Total Hip Replacement
Intertrochanteric Hip Fx
 Intertrochanteric
Femur Fracture
 Extra-capsular femoral
neck
 To inferior border of
the lesser trochanter
Intertrochanteric Hip Fx
 Intertrochanteric Femur
Fracture
 Physical Findings: Shortened
/ ER Posture
 Obtain Xrays: AP Pelvis,
Cross table lateral
Intertrochanteric Hip Fx
 Classification
 # of parts: Head/Neck, GT, LT, Shaft
 Stable
 Resists medial & compressive Loads after fixation
 Unstable
 Collapses into varus or shaft medializes despite anatomic
reduction with fixation
 Reverse Obliquity
Stable Reverse
Obliquity
Unstable
Intertrochanteric Hip Fx
Intertrochanteric Hip Fx
 Treatment Options
 Stable: Dynamic Hip Screw (2-hole)
 Unstable/Reverse: Intra Medullary Recon Nail
Subtrochanteric Femur Fx
 Classification
 Located from LT to 5cm
distal into shaft
 Intact Piriformis Fossa?
 Treatment
 IM Nail
 Cephalomedullary IM Nail
 ORIF
Femoral Shaft Fx
 Type 0 - No comminution
 Type 1 - Insignificant butterfly
fragment with transverse or short
oblique fracture
 Type 2 - Large butterfly of less than
50% of the bony width, > 50% of
cortex intact
 Type 3 - Larger butterfly leaving less
than 50% of the cortex in contact
 Type 4 - Segmental comminution
 Winquist and Hansen 66A,
1984
Femoral Shaft Fx
 Treatment Options
 IM Nail with locking screws
 ORIF with plate/screw construct
 External fixation
 Consider traction pin if prolonged delay to surgery
Distal Femur Fractures
 Distal Metaphyseal Fractures
 Look for intra-articular
involvement
 Plain films
 CT
Distal Femur Fractures
 Treatment:
 Retrograde IM Nail
 ORIF open vs. MIPO
 Above depends on
fracture type, bone
quality, and fracture
location
 High association of injuries
 Ligamentous Injury
 ACL, PCL, Posterolateral Corner
 LCL, MCL
 Vascular Injury
 Intimal tear vs. Disruption
 Obtain ABI’s  (+)  Arteriogram
 Vascular surgery consult with repair
within 8hrs
 Peroneal >>Tibial N. injury
Knee Dislocations
Patella Fractures
 History
 MVA, fall onto knee, eccentric
loading
 Physical Exam
 Ability to perform straight leg
raise against gravity (ie, extensor
mechanism still intact?)
 Pain, swelling, contusions,
lacerations and/or abrasions at the
site of injury
 Palpable defect
Patella Fractures
 Radiographs
 AP/Lateral/Sunrise views
 Treatment
 ORIF if ext mechanism is
incompetent
 Non-operative treatment with
brace if ext mechanism remains
intact
Tibia Fractures
 ProximalTibia Fractures (Tibial Plateau)
 Tibial Shaft Fractures
 DistalTibia Fractures (Tibial Pilon/Plafond)
Tibial Plateau Fractures
 MVA, fall from height, sporting injuries
 Mechanism and energy of injury plays a
major role in determining orthopedic care
 Examine soft tissues, neurologic exam
(peroneal N.), vascular exam (esp with medial
plateau injuries)
 Be aware for compartment syndrome
 Check for knee ligamentous instability
Tibial Plateau Fractures
 Xrays: AP/Lateral +/- traction films
 CT scan (after ex-fix if appropriate)
 Schatzker Classification of Plateau Fxs
Lower Energy
Higher Energy
Tibial Plateau Fractures
 Treatment
 Spanning External
Fixator may be
appropriate for
temporary stabilization
and to allow for
resolution of soft tissue
injuries
Insert blister
Pics of ex-fix here
Tibial Plateau Fractures
 Treatment
 Definitive ORIF for patients
with varus/valgus instability,
>5mm articular stepoff
 Non-operative in non-
displaced stable fractures or
patients with poor surgical
risks
Tibial Shaft Fractures
 Mechanism of Injury
 Can occur in lower energy, torsion type injury (e.g.,
skiing)
 More common with higher energy direct force (e.g.,
car bumper)
 Open fractures of the tibia are more common than
in any other long bone
Tibial Shaft Fractures
 Open Tibia Fx
 Priorities
– ABC’S
– Associated Injuries
– Tetanus
– Antibiotics
– Fixation
 Management of Open Fx
SoftTissues
 ER: initial evaluation 
wound covered with sterile
dressing and leg splinted,
tetanus prophylaxis and
appropriate antibiotics
 OR:Thorough I&D
undertaken within 6 hours
with serial debridements as
warranted followed by
definitive soft tissue cover
Tibial Shaft Fractures
Tibial Shaft Fractures
 Definitive Soft Tissue Coverage
– Proximal third tibia fractures can be covered with
gastrocnemius rotation flap
– Middle third tibia fractures can be covered with
soleus rotation flap
– Distal third fractures usually require free flap for
coverage
Tibial Shaft Fractures
 Treatment Options
 IM Nail
 ORIF with Plates
 External Fixation
 Cast
 Advantages of IM nailing
 Lower non-union rate
 Smaller incisions
 Earlier weightbearing and function
 Single surgery
Tibial Shaft Fractures
 IM nailing of distal
and proximal fx
 Can be done but
requires additional
planning, special nails,
and advanced
techniques
Tibial Shaft Fractures
 Fractures involving distal tibia metaphysis and
into the ankle joint
 Soft tissue management is key!
 Often occurs from fall from height or high energy
injuries in MVA
 “Excellent” results are rare, “Fair to Good” is the
norm outcome
 Multiple potential complications
Tibial Pilon Fractures
 Initial Evaluation
 Plain films, CT scan
 Spanning External Fixator
 Delayed Definitive Care to protect soft tissues and
allow for soft tissue swelling to resolve
Tibial Pilon Fractures
Tibial Pilon Fractures
 Treatment Goals
 RestoreArticular Surface
 Minimize SoftTissue Injury
 Establish Length
 AvoidVarus Collapse
 Treatment Options
 IM nail with limited ORIF
 ORIF
 External Fixator
Tibial Pilon Fractures
 Complications
 Mal or Non-union (Varus)
 SoftTissue Complications
 Infection
 PotentialAmputation

Lower extremity trauma 1

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Lower Extremity Trauma Hip Fractures / Dislocations  Femur Fractures  Patella Fractures  Knee Dislocations  Tibia Fractures  Ankle Fractures
  • 3.
    Hip Fractures  HipDislocations  Femoral Head Fractures  Femoral Neck Fractures  Intertrochanteric Fractures  Subtrochanteric Fractures
  • 4.
    Epidemiology  250,000 Hipfractures annually  Expected to double by 2050  At risk populations  Elderly: poor balance & vision, osteoporosis, inactivity, medications, malnutrition  Young: high energy trauma
  • 5.
    Hip Dislocations  Significanttrauma, usually MVA  Posterior: Hip flexion, Hip Internally Rotated & Adducted  Anterior: Limb in Flexion, External Rotation, Abduction
  • 6.
    Hip Dislocations  EmergentTreatment:Closed Reduction  Dislocated hip is an emergency  Goal is to reduce risk of Avascular Necrosis and Degenrative Joint Disease  Allows restoration of flow through occluded or compressed vessels  Literature supports decreasedAVN with earlier reduction  Requires proper anesthesia  Requires “team” (i.e. more than one person)
  • 7.
    Hip Dislocations  EmergentTreatment:Closed Reduction  General anesthesia with muscle relaxation facilitates reduction, but is not necessary  Conscious sedation is acceptable  Attempts at reduction with inadequate analgesia/ sedation will cause unnecessary pain, cause muscle spasm, and make subsequent attempts at reduction more difficult
  • 8.
    Hip Dislocations  EmergentTreatment:Closed Reduction  Allis Maneuver  Assistant stabilizes pelvis with pressure on Ant. Sup. Iliac Spine  Surgeon stands on stretcher and gently flexes hip to 90deg, applies progressively increasing traction to the extremity with gentle adduction and internal rotation  Reduction can often be seen and felt Insert hip Reduction Picture
  • 9.
    Hip Dislocations  FollowingClosed Reduction  Check stability of hip to 90deg flexion  Repeat X Ray Pelvis AP  Judet views of pelvis (if acetabulum fx)  CT scan with thin cuts through acetabulum  Remains of bony fragments within hip joint (indication for emergentOR trip to remove incarcerated fragment of bone)
  • 10.
    Femoral Head Fractures Concurrent with hip dislocation due to shear injury
  • 11.
    Femoral Head Fractures Pipkin Classification  I: Fracture inferior to fovea  II: Fracture superior to fovea  III: Femoral head + acetabulum fracture  IV: Femoral head + femoral neck fracture
  • 12.
    Femoral Head Fractures Treatment Options  Type I  Nonoperative: non-displaced  ORIF if displaced  Type II: ORIF  Type III: ORIF of both fractures  Type IV: ORIF vs. hemiarthroplasty
  • 13.
    Femoral Neck Fractures Garden Classification  I Valgus impacted  II Non-displaced  III Complete: Partially Displaced  IV Complete: Fully Displaced  Functional Classification  Stable (I/II)  Unstable (III/IV) I II III IV
  • 14.
    Femoral Neck Fractures Treatment Options  Non-operative  Very limited role  Activity modification  Skeletal traction  Operative  ORIF  Hemiarthroplasty (Endoprosthesis)  Total Hip Replacement
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Femoral Neck Fractures Young Patients  UrgentORIF (<6hrs)  Elderly Patients  ORIF possible (higher risk AVN, non-union, and failure of fixation)  Hemiarthroplasty  Total Hip Replacement
  • 17.
    Intertrochanteric Hip Fx Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture  Extra-capsular femoral neck  To inferior border of the lesser trochanter
  • 18.
    Intertrochanteric Hip Fx Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture  Physical Findings: Shortened / ER Posture  Obtain Xrays: AP Pelvis, Cross table lateral
  • 19.
    Intertrochanteric Hip Fx Classification  # of parts: Head/Neck, GT, LT, Shaft  Stable  Resists medial & compressive Loads after fixation  Unstable  Collapses into varus or shaft medializes despite anatomic reduction with fixation  Reverse Obliquity
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Intertrochanteric Hip Fx Treatment Options  Stable: Dynamic Hip Screw (2-hole)  Unstable/Reverse: Intra Medullary Recon Nail
  • 22.
    Subtrochanteric Femur Fx Classification  Located from LT to 5cm distal into shaft  Intact Piriformis Fossa?  Treatment  IM Nail  Cephalomedullary IM Nail  ORIF
  • 23.
    Femoral Shaft Fx Type 0 - No comminution  Type 1 - Insignificant butterfly fragment with transverse or short oblique fracture  Type 2 - Large butterfly of less than 50% of the bony width, > 50% of cortex intact  Type 3 - Larger butterfly leaving less than 50% of the cortex in contact  Type 4 - Segmental comminution  Winquist and Hansen 66A, 1984
  • 24.
    Femoral Shaft Fx Treatment Options  IM Nail with locking screws  ORIF with plate/screw construct  External fixation  Consider traction pin if prolonged delay to surgery
  • 25.
    Distal Femur Fractures Distal Metaphyseal Fractures  Look for intra-articular involvement  Plain films  CT
  • 26.
    Distal Femur Fractures Treatment:  Retrograde IM Nail  ORIF open vs. MIPO  Above depends on fracture type, bone quality, and fracture location
  • 27.
     High associationof injuries  Ligamentous Injury  ACL, PCL, Posterolateral Corner  LCL, MCL  Vascular Injury  Intimal tear vs. Disruption  Obtain ABI’s  (+)  Arteriogram  Vascular surgery consult with repair within 8hrs  Peroneal >>Tibial N. injury Knee Dislocations
  • 28.
    Patella Fractures  History MVA, fall onto knee, eccentric loading  Physical Exam  Ability to perform straight leg raise against gravity (ie, extensor mechanism still intact?)  Pain, swelling, contusions, lacerations and/or abrasions at the site of injury  Palpable defect
  • 29.
    Patella Fractures  Radiographs AP/Lateral/Sunrise views  Treatment  ORIF if ext mechanism is incompetent  Non-operative treatment with brace if ext mechanism remains intact
  • 30.
    Tibia Fractures  ProximalTibiaFractures (Tibial Plateau)  Tibial Shaft Fractures  DistalTibia Fractures (Tibial Pilon/Plafond)
  • 31.
    Tibial Plateau Fractures MVA, fall from height, sporting injuries  Mechanism and energy of injury plays a major role in determining orthopedic care  Examine soft tissues, neurologic exam (peroneal N.), vascular exam (esp with medial plateau injuries)  Be aware for compartment syndrome  Check for knee ligamentous instability
  • 32.
    Tibial Plateau Fractures Xrays: AP/Lateral +/- traction films  CT scan (after ex-fix if appropriate)
  • 33.
     Schatzker Classificationof Plateau Fxs Lower Energy Higher Energy
  • 34.
    Tibial Plateau Fractures Treatment  Spanning External Fixator may be appropriate for temporary stabilization and to allow for resolution of soft tissue injuries Insert blister Pics of ex-fix here
  • 35.
    Tibial Plateau Fractures Treatment  Definitive ORIF for patients with varus/valgus instability, >5mm articular stepoff  Non-operative in non- displaced stable fractures or patients with poor surgical risks
  • 36.
    Tibial Shaft Fractures Mechanism of Injury  Can occur in lower energy, torsion type injury (e.g., skiing)  More common with higher energy direct force (e.g., car bumper)  Open fractures of the tibia are more common than in any other long bone
  • 37.
    Tibial Shaft Fractures Open Tibia Fx  Priorities – ABC’S – Associated Injuries – Tetanus – Antibiotics – Fixation
  • 38.
     Management ofOpen Fx SoftTissues  ER: initial evaluation  wound covered with sterile dressing and leg splinted, tetanus prophylaxis and appropriate antibiotics  OR:Thorough I&D undertaken within 6 hours with serial debridements as warranted followed by definitive soft tissue cover Tibial Shaft Fractures
  • 39.
    Tibial Shaft Fractures Definitive Soft Tissue Coverage – Proximal third tibia fractures can be covered with gastrocnemius rotation flap – Middle third tibia fractures can be covered with soleus rotation flap – Distal third fractures usually require free flap for coverage
  • 40.
    Tibial Shaft Fractures Treatment Options  IM Nail  ORIF with Plates  External Fixation  Cast
  • 41.
     Advantages ofIM nailing  Lower non-union rate  Smaller incisions  Earlier weightbearing and function  Single surgery Tibial Shaft Fractures
  • 42.
     IM nailingof distal and proximal fx  Can be done but requires additional planning, special nails, and advanced techniques Tibial Shaft Fractures
  • 43.
     Fractures involvingdistal tibia metaphysis and into the ankle joint  Soft tissue management is key!  Often occurs from fall from height or high energy injuries in MVA  “Excellent” results are rare, “Fair to Good” is the norm outcome  Multiple potential complications Tibial Pilon Fractures
  • 44.
     Initial Evaluation Plain films, CT scan  Spanning External Fixator  Delayed Definitive Care to protect soft tissues and allow for soft tissue swelling to resolve Tibial Pilon Fractures
  • 45.
    Tibial Pilon Fractures Treatment Goals  RestoreArticular Surface  Minimize SoftTissue Injury  Establish Length  AvoidVarus Collapse  Treatment Options  IM nail with limited ORIF  ORIF  External Fixator
  • 46.
    Tibial Pilon Fractures Complications  Mal or Non-union (Varus)  SoftTissue Complications  Infection  PotentialAmputation