Download to read offline
![[M0]
genesis and evolution](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/m0-140922092546-phpapp01/75/IFI7159-M0-1-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byDavid Lamas
IFI7159 M0
HCI has evolved over time from focusing on system components and tasks to considering socially embedded interactions. Early HCI emphasized usability and enabling human capabilities through technologies like graphical UIs [first sentence]. As computing expanded beyond workplaces, the field incorporated theories of context, activity, and culture to understand user experiences [second sentence]. Modern HCI focuses on designing with users through methods like prototyping and uses a range of qualitative research approaches to study technology use in natural settings [third sentence].
More Related Content
IFI7159 M0
- 1. [M0] genesis andevolution
- 2. HCI has thepotential to change human behaviour HCI is transdisciplinar HCI emphasizes human values and goals HCI is vast Usability is a key issue in HCI HCI enables the extension of human capabilities HCI is a gap filler HCI is good in predicting the future, Alan Kay way HCI is about finding the perfect symbiosis between users and computer application HCI more than just concerned in the design of personal computer and it’s operating system HCI serves as a bridge between science and practice HCI build on human factors and cognitive sciences
- 4. Electrical Symbolical TextualGraphical Tangible Paul Dourish First analog computers where operations were directly encoded in it’s circuits which needed to be configured for each new task. There were no “users”, only programmers. First assembly languages appeared, that rendered machine level instructions into symbolic expressions. The actual interaction took still place with encoded punch cards, although the languages could already be considered textual. With the appearance of teletype machines and video terminals, the primary form of interaction became textual. This can be considered the origin of interactive computing - “interactive loop” in which the interaction became an endless back and forth loop of instruction and response between user and system. With the appearance of graphical UIs the interaction moved from the one dimensional stream of characters to a two dimensional space. The task of managing interaction became the task of managing space. Interaction directly through physical artifacts rather than graphical interfaces or classical input devices
- 5. focus on theproperties of specific system components focus on tasks at hand focus on socially and materially embedded interactions John M. Carroll
- 6. 1st Wave 2ndWave 3rd Wave Susanne Bødker Rigid guidelines. Formal methods. Systematic testing. Focus on context and groups working with a collection of applications. Theories: situated action, distributed cognition and activity theory. Proactive methods: variety of participatory design workshops, prototyping and contextual inquiry, qualitative approaches studying use as it happens. Use of context and application types are broadened. Computers are increasingly being used in private and public spheres. Technology spreads from workplace to homes and everyday lives and culture. Theoretical focus on aesthetics, cultural level, cognitive expands into emotional, cultural, historical focus on experience. Methods moved away from commitment to users towards more exploratory take-it-or-leave it approach where designers seek inspiration from use.
- 7. Classical theories Moderntheories Contemporary theories Yvonne Rogers Applying basic research. Cognitive modeling. Distributed cognition. Situated action. Ethnomethodology and ethnography. Activity theory. Grounded theory. Human values. Research in the wild. Turn to design, culture, embodiment.
- 8. Electrical Symbolical TextualGraphical Tangible 1st Wave 2nd Wave 3rd Wave Classical theories Modern theories Contemporary theories