Managing change, 
inside and out 
Andrew Careaga | Missouri University of Science and Technology 
Aggregate Conference – Louisville| September 30, 2014 
@andrewcareaga | #GGRGT 
Photo: “I Ching,” by Ross Griff, www.flickr.com/photos/rossaroni
HOW ... 
can we manage change? 
We can’t 
j/k (sorta)
‘No man ever steps in 
the same river twice.’ 
Heraclitus
‘It is not the strongest 
of the species that 
survives, nor the most 
intelligent that 
survives. It is the one 
that is most 
adaptable to 
change.’ 
Charles Darwin
The only person who likes 
change is a wet baby. 
Attributed to Mark Twain
Why do we fear change? 
freedigitalphotos.net
From smooth rowing…
… to ‘permanent white water’
In 2014 … 
What changes have you experienced… 
• In your own organization? 
• In your department or division? 
• In your life?
CSI: the Change Style Indicator 
W. Christopher Musselwhite & Robyn Ingram 
Helps us understand: 
 Our own reactions to change 
 How others react to change 
 No right or wrong, ‘better’ or ‘worse’ 
style 
Adapted from “Leading Change,” University of Missouri Administrative Leadership 
Program
The three change styles 
Conservers Pragmatists Originators 
Traditionalists Mediators Change agents 
Accept the 
structure 
Explore the 
structure 
Challenge the 
structure 
Prefer 
incremental 
change 
Prefer 
functional 
change 
Prefer 
expansive 
change
Via Lisa Dunbar, “Why We Fear Doing Things Differently,” Feb. 9, 2012, 
newdirectionsconsulting.com/leadership-engagement/blog-why-we-fear-doing-things-differently-2/
Via Lisa Dunbar, “Why We Fear Doing Things Differently,” Feb. 9, 2012, 
newdirectionsconsulting.com/leadership-engagement/blog-why-we-fear-doing-things-differently-2/
Via Lisa Dunbar, “Why We Fear Doing Things Differently,” Feb. 9, 2012, 
newdirectionsconsulting.com/leadership-engagement/blog-why-we-fear-doing-things-differently-2/
Change and the Conserver 
 Deliberate, 
disciplined, 
organized 
 Operates from 
conventional 
assumptions 
 Enjoys 
predictability 
 Appears cautious, 
inflexible 
 Honors tradition 
and established 
practice
The Conserver at work 
 Secure environment 
 No unexpected 
disruptions, surprises 
 Disciplined and 
organized 
 Attends to details and 
facts 
 Prefers tested, proven 
solutions 
 Prefers to involve 
groups in decision-making, 
problem-solving
Change and the Pragmatist 
 Practical, agreeable, 
flexible 
 Operates as mediator 
and catalyst for 
understanding 
 Open to both sides of 
an argument 
 Middle-of-the-road 
approach 
 Team-oriented
The Pragmatist at work 
 Peacemakers, 
‘middle-of-the-roaders’ 
 Reasonable, practical 
 Agreeable, flexible 
 Team-oriented 
 Mediators 
 Likes an action-oriented 
workplace 
 Harmonious, 
participative 
atmosphere
Change and the Originator 
 Appears undisciplined, 
unconventional, 
spontaneous 
 Prefers change that 
challenges current 
structure 
 Challenges accepted 
assumptions 
 Enjoys risk and 
uncertainty 
 May be impractical, 
miss important details 
 Appears visionary, 
systemic 
 Little regard for 
accepted procedures
The Originator at work 
 Prefers quick, expansive 
change 
 Change agent 
 Loathes repetitive tasks 
 May appear 
undisciplined, 
unconventional 
 Challenges existing 
assumptions, rules, 
regulations 
 Regarded as visionary, 
“out of the box” 
 Idea people
‘I like things to 
happen. And if 
they don’t 
happen, I like to 
make them 
happen.’ 
Winston Churchill
Perceptions: conservers and originators 
Conservers see originators as: Originators see conservers as: 
 Divisive, impulsive 
 Lacking appreciation 
of tested ways of 
getting things done 
 Starting but not finishing 
projects 
 Not interested in 
 follow through 
 Wanting change for 
change’ sake 
 Not understanding how 
things get done 
 Dogmatic 
 Bureaucratic 
 Yielding to authority 
 Having their head in the sand 
 Preferring the status quo 
 Lacking new ideas
Perceptions of the pragmatists 
Conservers and originators 
see pragmatists as: 
 Compromising 
 Mediating 
 Indecisive 
 Easily influenced 
 Noncommittal 
 Hiding behind team needs
Collaboration: can we 
really all work together? 
Conservers Pragmatists Originators 
Prefer to keep 
current structure 
operating smoothly 
Prefer balanced 
inquiry 
Prefer to challenge 
accepted structure 
Focus on 
relationships 
Focus on shared 
objectives 
Focus on the task 
Encourage 
building on what is 
already working 
Encourage looking 
at the current 
circumstances 
Encourage 
exploring new 
possibilities
Change and the creative process 
Incubation  Inspiration  Perspiration  Verification 
Roles in the creative process 
Originators Pragmatists Conservers 
Inspiration Perspiration Verification 
Conceptualize Concretize Refine 
Initiate Implement Follow through
Relating theory to reality 
Think about a current or recent 
project during which people had 
difficulty working together. Write the 
name of each person involved and 
how you would describe his or her 
change style (conserver, pragmatist, 
originator)
What would have changed if… 
 How could communication among 
team members have been 
approved? 
 Advantages or limitations to 
communications approaches? 
 What ideas would have the best 
chance of succeeding?
Change means… 
 Conflict 
 Challenging assumptions 
 Team building 
 Working in the public realm 
 Transformation 
 Self-control 
 Education
Change will occur if A <BCD 
A = Benefit of status quo 
B = Pain of maintaining status quo 
C = Vision of something better 
D = Small steps toward change
The 20-60-20 rule 
20%  want 
change no matter 
what 
60%  waiting to 
see  focus here 
20%  will fight you 
70 
60 
50 
40 
30 
20 
10 
no matter what 0 
For Undecided Against
‘The Middle Manager’s Dilemma’* 
Leading change imposed from above 
 Reflect before you act 
 Acknowledge your own feelings 
 Learn all you can before talking to your team 
 Be professional 
 Influence decision-makers 
 Use the type of data that is important to your 
boss 
 Offer ways to make the change successful 
 Use humor 
 Pick your battles 
* Title of book by Rick Maurer
Leading change imposed from above 
 Get your team involved 
 Build trust (trust = integrity + competence) 
 Find ways to make the change your own 
 Establish common ground 
 Develop a strategy that attends to both 
people and the project 
 Build strategic alliances 
 Be yourself 
 Do things to prove reliability over time with 
stakeholders
‘The central issue is never 
strategy, structure, culture, or 
systems. The core of the matter 
is always about changing the 
behavior of people.’ 
John Kotter 
Source: David Pohl, "Change or Die," Fast Company, May 2005 
(www.fastcompany.com/magazine/94/open_change-or-die.html).
Change is 
inevitable – 
except from a 
vending 
machine. 
Author unknown

Managing change inside and out

  • 1.
    Managing change, insideand out Andrew Careaga | Missouri University of Science and Technology Aggregate Conference – Louisville| September 30, 2014 @andrewcareaga | #GGRGT Photo: “I Ching,” by Ross Griff, www.flickr.com/photos/rossaroni
  • 2.
    HOW ... canwe manage change? We can’t j/k (sorta)
  • 3.
    ‘No man eversteps in the same river twice.’ Heraclitus
  • 4.
    ‘It is notthe strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is most adaptable to change.’ Charles Darwin
  • 5.
    The only personwho likes change is a wet baby. Attributed to Mark Twain
  • 6.
    Why do wefear change? freedigitalphotos.net
  • 7.
  • 8.
    … to ‘permanentwhite water’
  • 9.
    In 2014 … What changes have you experienced… • In your own organization? • In your department or division? • In your life?
  • 10.
    CSI: the ChangeStyle Indicator W. Christopher Musselwhite & Robyn Ingram Helps us understand:  Our own reactions to change  How others react to change  No right or wrong, ‘better’ or ‘worse’ style Adapted from “Leading Change,” University of Missouri Administrative Leadership Program
  • 11.
    The three changestyles Conservers Pragmatists Originators Traditionalists Mediators Change agents Accept the structure Explore the structure Challenge the structure Prefer incremental change Prefer functional change Prefer expansive change
  • 12.
    Via Lisa Dunbar,“Why We Fear Doing Things Differently,” Feb. 9, 2012, newdirectionsconsulting.com/leadership-engagement/blog-why-we-fear-doing-things-differently-2/
  • 13.
    Via Lisa Dunbar,“Why We Fear Doing Things Differently,” Feb. 9, 2012, newdirectionsconsulting.com/leadership-engagement/blog-why-we-fear-doing-things-differently-2/
  • 14.
    Via Lisa Dunbar,“Why We Fear Doing Things Differently,” Feb. 9, 2012, newdirectionsconsulting.com/leadership-engagement/blog-why-we-fear-doing-things-differently-2/
  • 15.
    Change and theConserver  Deliberate, disciplined, organized  Operates from conventional assumptions  Enjoys predictability  Appears cautious, inflexible  Honors tradition and established practice
  • 16.
    The Conserver atwork  Secure environment  No unexpected disruptions, surprises  Disciplined and organized  Attends to details and facts  Prefers tested, proven solutions  Prefers to involve groups in decision-making, problem-solving
  • 17.
    Change and thePragmatist  Practical, agreeable, flexible  Operates as mediator and catalyst for understanding  Open to both sides of an argument  Middle-of-the-road approach  Team-oriented
  • 18.
    The Pragmatist atwork  Peacemakers, ‘middle-of-the-roaders’  Reasonable, practical  Agreeable, flexible  Team-oriented  Mediators  Likes an action-oriented workplace  Harmonious, participative atmosphere
  • 19.
    Change and theOriginator  Appears undisciplined, unconventional, spontaneous  Prefers change that challenges current structure  Challenges accepted assumptions  Enjoys risk and uncertainty  May be impractical, miss important details  Appears visionary, systemic  Little regard for accepted procedures
  • 20.
    The Originator atwork  Prefers quick, expansive change  Change agent  Loathes repetitive tasks  May appear undisciplined, unconventional  Challenges existing assumptions, rules, regulations  Regarded as visionary, “out of the box”  Idea people
  • 21.
    ‘I like thingsto happen. And if they don’t happen, I like to make them happen.’ Winston Churchill
  • 22.
    Perceptions: conservers andoriginators Conservers see originators as: Originators see conservers as:  Divisive, impulsive  Lacking appreciation of tested ways of getting things done  Starting but not finishing projects  Not interested in  follow through  Wanting change for change’ sake  Not understanding how things get done  Dogmatic  Bureaucratic  Yielding to authority  Having their head in the sand  Preferring the status quo  Lacking new ideas
  • 23.
    Perceptions of thepragmatists Conservers and originators see pragmatists as:  Compromising  Mediating  Indecisive  Easily influenced  Noncommittal  Hiding behind team needs
  • 24.
    Collaboration: can we really all work together? Conservers Pragmatists Originators Prefer to keep current structure operating smoothly Prefer balanced inquiry Prefer to challenge accepted structure Focus on relationships Focus on shared objectives Focus on the task Encourage building on what is already working Encourage looking at the current circumstances Encourage exploring new possibilities
  • 25.
    Change and thecreative process Incubation  Inspiration  Perspiration  Verification Roles in the creative process Originators Pragmatists Conservers Inspiration Perspiration Verification Conceptualize Concretize Refine Initiate Implement Follow through
  • 26.
    Relating theory toreality Think about a current or recent project during which people had difficulty working together. Write the name of each person involved and how you would describe his or her change style (conserver, pragmatist, originator)
  • 27.
    What would havechanged if…  How could communication among team members have been approved?  Advantages or limitations to communications approaches?  What ideas would have the best chance of succeeding?
  • 28.
    Change means… Conflict  Challenging assumptions  Team building  Working in the public realm  Transformation  Self-control  Education
  • 29.
    Change will occurif A <BCD A = Benefit of status quo B = Pain of maintaining status quo C = Vision of something better D = Small steps toward change
  • 30.
    The 20-60-20 rule 20%  want change no matter what 60%  waiting to see  focus here 20%  will fight you 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 no matter what 0 For Undecided Against
  • 31.
    ‘The Middle Manager’sDilemma’* Leading change imposed from above  Reflect before you act  Acknowledge your own feelings  Learn all you can before talking to your team  Be professional  Influence decision-makers  Use the type of data that is important to your boss  Offer ways to make the change successful  Use humor  Pick your battles * Title of book by Rick Maurer
  • 32.
    Leading change imposedfrom above  Get your team involved  Build trust (trust = integrity + competence)  Find ways to make the change your own  Establish common ground  Develop a strategy that attends to both people and the project  Build strategic alliances  Be yourself  Do things to prove reliability over time with stakeholders
  • 33.
    ‘The central issueis never strategy, structure, culture, or systems. The core of the matter is always about changing the behavior of people.’ John Kotter Source: David Pohl, "Change or Die," Fast Company, May 2005 (www.fastcompany.com/magazine/94/open_change-or-die.html).
  • 34.
    Change is inevitable– except from a vending machine. Author unknown