FROM BEAN COUNTERS TO
  SOCIAL BUTTERFLIES:
FACILITATING ONLINE K12
 LEARNER INTERACTIONS

  DR. LISA S. MCBRIDE
Research, Trends, and Statistics

                                          International Association
            iNacol                         of K12 Online Learning

● „     The PreK-12 Academic          ●      38 states have state virtual
    segment of the online learning        schools or state-led online
    industry is growing faster than       initiatives, and Alaska is planning
    any other segment, with a 16.8%       to open a statewide online
    annual growth rate.                   learning network in 2011.

●      27 states, as well as          ● „     75% of school districts had
    Washington, DC, have statewide        one or more students enrolled in
    full-time online schools.             an online or blended learning
                                          course.
Lesley University Advanced Professional Certificate in
         Online Teaching: Online Program
Top 10 Reasons for Online Learning

 10. I can work around a busy schedule
 9. I can keep up with my work when my family travels
 8. My courses are more challenging
 7. My parents can see my work and grades
 6. I know how I'm doing, my grades are right on the screen
 5. I can do all my math for the week on one day if I want to
 4. My teachers are just as excited about online learning as I
 am
 3. I get personalized support when I need it
 2. I get nearly instant responses from my teachers
 1. I can work ahead if I'm able to
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-vander-ark/utah-
 poised-to-lead-in-on_b_822298.html
Interactions:

What Does the
Research Say?

 “Learning
 occurs
 socially
 within
 communities
 of practice.”
(Swan, 2003)
                 The community of Inquiry model. Copyright 2007 R. Garrison, T.
                 Anderson, W. Archer and L. Rourke et al., University of Calgary.
Why Collaboration?

Research               Experience



 Rourke
 Anderson
 Moore
 Haythornthwaite
 Gunawardena
 Swan
How to make collaboration work

Promote an information     Provide means for faster
   sharing culture.                feedback.

Model group norms.
                                      Build community
                                  capacity by providing
Model good communication     means for students to
 behaviors.                  socialize.

Establish social and/or    Provide both public and
  technical means for        private means of
  synchronous                communication.
  communication.
                           Haythornthwaite (2002).
Building a Community of Online Learners
Extending the Community to Stakeholders

Administration              Parents


 Access                     Learning Support
 Communication              Agreements (LSA)
                                Student Expectations
 Acceptable Use Policies
                                Instructor Expectations
   Expectations

   Infractions
                             Parent Guides
   CyberBullying Issues       Readiness

                               Concerns

                               Access

                               Communication
The Facilitator Voice

Ambrose            Blignaut & Trollip
Less-Than-Positive Interactions
 Cyber Bullying                   Underachievers

                                      ARCS
     STOP!                             Attention
     BLOCK!                            Relevancy
     TELL!                             Confidence
                                        Satisfaction


                                      Build Community of Online
     StopCyberBullying.org            Learners
     National Crime Prevention       Meaningful Engaged
      Council                          Learning
     BrainPop Cyberbullying          Emergent Leader Issues
                                      Peer Evaluations
The Effective Collaborator Rubric for Group Project Evaluation
        Name of Student Being Evaluated                                                                                                                   Evaluation Date

                   Total Score                                                                                                                           Evaluator’s Name




                                                             0–4                                            5 – 10                                             11 – 15                                              16 – 25
                                                            Points                                          Points                                             Points                                               Points




          Contribution to Group’s Tasks         Chooses not to participate                  Participates inconsistently in group                Participates in group most of the time              Participates actively
                                                Shows no concern for goals                  Shows sporadic concern for goals                    Shows concern for goals most of the time            Models caring about goals




                                                Impedes goal setting process                Participates sporadically in goal setting           Participates in goal setting most of the time       Helps direct the group in setting goals
          Completion of Personal Tasks
                                                Impedes group from meeting goals            Participates sometimes in meeting goals             Participates in meeting goals most of the time      Helps direct group in meeting goals
                                                Does not complete assigned tasks            Completes assigned tasks                            Completes assigned tasks the majority of the time   Thoroughly completes assigned tasks




                 Discussion Skills              Discourages sharing                         Shares ideas occasionally when encouraged           Shares ideas most of the time                       Shares many ideas related to the goals
                                                Does not participate in group discussions   Allows sharing by most group members                Sometimes encourages groups                         Encourages all group members to share their ideas




                                                Does not listen to others                   Listens to others sometimes
                 Active Listening                                                                                                               Listens and takes other’s feelings into             Listens attentively to others
                                                Not considerate of others’ feelings and     Considers other people’s feelings and ideas
                                                                                                                                                consideration most of the time                      Empathetic to other people’s feelings and ideas
                                                ideas                                       sometimes




        Contribution to Group’s Evaluation      Discourages evaluation of how well the                                                                                                              Encourages group to evaluate how well they are
                                                                                            Participates marginally in group evaluation         Encourages group evaluation
                                                group is working                                                                                                                                    working together as well as self evaluation




                                                                                            Offers suggestions occasionally to solve problems
                 Problem-solving                Chooses not to participate in problem-                                                          Offers suggestions to solve problems and
                                                                                            Demonstrates effort sometimes to help the group                                                         Involves the whole group in problem-solving
                                                solving                                                                                         sometimes encourages group participation
                                                                                            work together




                                                                                                                                                Demonstrates effort to help the group work          Actively participates in helping the group work
                    Cohesion
                                                Promotes fragmentation of group             Does not impede group’s efforts                     together a majority of the time                     together better




Adapted from Central Piedmont Community College (author unknown)
Success Stories




 Florida Virtual High School
 Open High School of Utah
 Commonwealth Connections Academy
 Global Schoolnet International Schools CyberFair
Questions, Surveys, and
                       Giveaway!
2 steps:

• Navigate to the
session(s) you attended
and click the ‘Evaluation’
link to begin.


• Answer the questions on
the evaluation and hit
submit!

That’s it!
McBride.Cue.Presentation
McBride.Cue.Presentation

McBride.Cue.Presentation

  • 1.
    FROM BEAN COUNTERSTO SOCIAL BUTTERFLIES: FACILITATING ONLINE K12 LEARNER INTERACTIONS DR. LISA S. MCBRIDE
  • 2.
    Research, Trends, andStatistics International Association iNacol of K12 Online Learning ● „ The PreK-12 Academic ● 38 states have state virtual segment of the online learning schools or state-led online industry is growing faster than initiatives, and Alaska is planning any other segment, with a 16.8% to open a statewide online annual growth rate. learning network in 2011. ● 27 states, as well as ● „ 75% of school districts had Washington, DC, have statewide one or more students enrolled in full-time online schools. an online or blended learning course.
  • 3.
    Lesley University AdvancedProfessional Certificate in Online Teaching: Online Program
  • 4.
    Top 10 Reasonsfor Online Learning 10. I can work around a busy schedule 9. I can keep up with my work when my family travels 8. My courses are more challenging 7. My parents can see my work and grades 6. I know how I'm doing, my grades are right on the screen 5. I can do all my math for the week on one day if I want to 4. My teachers are just as excited about online learning as I am 3. I get personalized support when I need it 2. I get nearly instant responses from my teachers 1. I can work ahead if I'm able to http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-vander-ark/utah- poised-to-lead-in-on_b_822298.html
  • 5.
    Interactions: What Does the ResearchSay? “Learning occurs socially within communities of practice.” (Swan, 2003) The community of Inquiry model. Copyright 2007 R. Garrison, T. Anderson, W. Archer and L. Rourke et al., University of Calgary.
  • 6.
    Why Collaboration? Research Experience  Rourke  Anderson  Moore  Haythornthwaite  Gunawardena  Swan
  • 7.
    How to makecollaboration work Promote an information Provide means for faster sharing culture. feedback. Model group norms. Build community capacity by providing Model good communication means for students to behaviors. socialize. Establish social and/or Provide both public and technical means for private means of synchronous communication. communication. Haythornthwaite (2002).
  • 8.
    Building a Communityof Online Learners
  • 9.
    Extending the Communityto Stakeholders Administration Parents  Access  Learning Support  Communication Agreements (LSA)  Student Expectations  Acceptable Use Policies  Instructor Expectations  Expectations  Infractions  Parent Guides  CyberBullying Issues  Readiness  Concerns  Access  Communication
  • 11.
    The Facilitator Voice Ambrose Blignaut & Trollip
  • 12.
    Less-Than-Positive Interactions  CyberBullying  Underachievers  ARCS  STOP!  Attention  BLOCK!  Relevancy  TELL!  Confidence  Satisfaction  Build Community of Online  StopCyberBullying.org Learners  National Crime Prevention  Meaningful Engaged Council Learning  BrainPop Cyberbullying  Emergent Leader Issues  Peer Evaluations
  • 13.
    The Effective CollaboratorRubric for Group Project Evaluation Name of Student Being Evaluated Evaluation Date Total Score Evaluator’s Name 0–4 5 – 10 11 – 15 16 – 25 Points Points Points Points Contribution to Group’s Tasks Chooses not to participate Participates inconsistently in group Participates in group most of the time Participates actively Shows no concern for goals Shows sporadic concern for goals Shows concern for goals most of the time Models caring about goals Impedes goal setting process Participates sporadically in goal setting Participates in goal setting most of the time Helps direct the group in setting goals Completion of Personal Tasks Impedes group from meeting goals Participates sometimes in meeting goals Participates in meeting goals most of the time Helps direct group in meeting goals Does not complete assigned tasks Completes assigned tasks Completes assigned tasks the majority of the time Thoroughly completes assigned tasks Discussion Skills Discourages sharing Shares ideas occasionally when encouraged Shares ideas most of the time Shares many ideas related to the goals Does not participate in group discussions Allows sharing by most group members Sometimes encourages groups Encourages all group members to share their ideas Does not listen to others Listens to others sometimes Active Listening Listens and takes other’s feelings into Listens attentively to others Not considerate of others’ feelings and Considers other people’s feelings and ideas consideration most of the time Empathetic to other people’s feelings and ideas ideas sometimes Contribution to Group’s Evaluation Discourages evaluation of how well the Encourages group to evaluate how well they are Participates marginally in group evaluation Encourages group evaluation group is working working together as well as self evaluation Offers suggestions occasionally to solve problems Problem-solving Chooses not to participate in problem- Offers suggestions to solve problems and Demonstrates effort sometimes to help the group Involves the whole group in problem-solving solving sometimes encourages group participation work together Demonstrates effort to help the group work Actively participates in helping the group work Cohesion Promotes fragmentation of group Does not impede group’s efforts together a majority of the time together better Adapted from Central Piedmont Community College (author unknown)
  • 14.
    Success Stories  FloridaVirtual High School  Open High School of Utah  Commonwealth Connections Academy  Global Schoolnet International Schools CyberFair
  • 15.
    Questions, Surveys, and Giveaway! 2 steps: • Navigate to the session(s) you attended and click the ‘Evaluation’ link to begin. • Answer the questions on the evaluation and hit submit! That’s it!