Mirantis v OpenStack Ansible Dawn of Production
7 likesâą1,197 views
This document discusses different options for deploying OpenStack including Packstack, TripleO, Fuel, and OpenStack Ansible. Packstack provides an all-in-one installation but lacks support for high availability and complex configurations. TripleO uses OpenStack native projects like Ironic but has a very high learning curve and is mostly CLI-driven. Fuel provides a wizard-driven deployment but has a non-flexible architecture. OpenStack Ansible is flexible, container-based, and easy to customize but network and OS installation must be done manually with no vendor support. The document recommends OpenStack Ansible for development/proof-of-concept and Fuel or TripleO for production-ready deployments.
Mirantis v OpenStack Ansible Dawn of Production
- 1. Mirantis v OpenStack Ansible Dawn of Production Mr. Charnsilp Chinprasert Mr. Khomkrit Viangvises
- 2. Mr Charnsilp Chinprasert (Tek) 1st Speaker
- 9. Compute
- 10. Networking
- 13. Where is ?
- 15. OpenStack
- 19. Cloud Software
- 20. Every 6 months
- 24. How to Get Started with OpenStack?
- 28. a Week to Months
- 29. Pitfalls
- 30. Why ?
- 32. Micro services
- 33. Preparation âą Network âą NTP âą Memcache âą DB ( Mysql Galera ) âą RabbitMQ
- 34. More than 20+ nodes !!!!
- 35. Human Error ? High Availability Typo ConïŹguration management Network Design Hardware Design Hardware Design Security bug patch Security Scalable Monitoring Logging Image Optimization Api Health Check
- 40. 2nd Speaker Mr. Khomkrit Viangvises (ToomTam) 4 years of OpenStack experiences
- 41. How to Get Started with OpenStack?
- 44. $ sudo yum install -y https://rdoproject.org/repos/rdo-release.rpm $ sudo yum update -y $ sudo yum install -y openstack-packstack $ packstack --allinone PackstackPackstack
- 45. Packstack Pros âą Based on puppet modules modules that are executed locally. âą Ideal for small environment 1. Single-node proof-of-concept installations 2. Proof-of-concept installations where there is a single controller node and multiple compute nodes Cons âą No support for: âą High availability for services. âą Load Balancing. âą Complex network conïŹgurations. Packstack
- 47. TripleO Pros âą Native OpenStack Project Ironic âą Native OpenStack TripleO Cons âą Mostly manual CLI driven deployment âą Very high learning curve TripleO
- 48. Stackalytics
- 49. (Mirantis)
- 50. Cluster Summary
- 52. Setup Wizard
- 53. Fuel (Mirantis) Pros âą Wizard driven deployment âą Plugin Framework âą Built-in-Health Check (Pre- Post) âą Multi Cluster Management âą Hardware discovery Cons âą Non-Flexible Architect deployment âą Hard to customize Fuel Fuel (Mirantis)
- 55. OpenStack Ansible (Rackspace) Pros âą Flexible Architect deployment âą Container based âą Build form upstream sources âą Security follow by STIGs âą Easy to Customization Cons âą OS installation manually âą Network setup manually âą No vendor support âą Stable version may got bugs âą No GUI wizard OpenStack Ansible (RackSpace)
- 56. ofïŹcial document FUELPackstack OpenStack Ansible Deployment (OSAD) 1 2 Start 3 4 5 Development & PoC Production Ready
- 57. How to Get Started with OpenStack?
- 58. Easy & Powerful Flexible & Scalable
- 59. Q & A
- 60. OpenStack Driver âą Compute Driver âą https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HypervisorSupportMatrix âą Network Driver âą https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/ML2 âą Storage Driver: âą https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderSupportMatrix