MOBILE Ad-HOC
NETWORK (MANET)
CONTENTS
• INTRODUCTION
• CHARACTERISTICS OF MANET
• MECHANISM OF MANET
• TRANSMISSION STANDARDS
• ROUTING PROTOCOL
• PROS AND CONS FOR MANET
• MANET USAGE AREAS
• CONCLUSION
• FUTURE ASPECTS
• REFERENCE
• Easy to Configure, Rapidly Deployable.
• Existing Infrastructure not needed.
• Wireless link.
• Dynamic topology, Nodes are mobile.
• A MANET is a type of Standalone network and also
can be connected to an external network.
Example of MANET
Cellular vs. ad-hoc network
Cellular Network Ad-Hoc Network
 Infrastructure network.  Infrastructure less network.
 Fixed, pre-located cell sites and
stations.
 No base station and rapid
deployment.
 Detailed planning before setting
up a base station.
 Ad-hoc network automatically
forms and adapt to changes.
 High cost for setup.  Low cost for setup.
 Large setup time.  Less setup time.
TYPES OF MANET
• InVANETs – Intelligent Vehicular ad-hoc network
make use of AI to tackle unexpected situation like
vehicle collisions and accidents.
• VANETs – Vehicular ad hoc network enables
effective communication with another vehicle or
helps to communicate with roadside equipments.
• iMANET– Internet based Mobile ad hoc network
helps to link , fixed as well as mobile nodes.
Characteristic of MANET
•MANET is classified in multihop and
mobility.
• Mobile nodes are characterized with less memory,
weight, power and light features.
• Required minimum human intervention to
configure the network.
Mechanism for manet
• Multihop operation required for routing
mechanism in different mobile nodes.
• Internet access mechanism.
• Mechanism to detect and act on , merging of
existing network.
• Self configuring network requires an address
allocation mechanism.
• Security mechanism.
Transmission standards
• Piconet.
• Home RF ( Radio Frequency ).
• IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN WG ( Working Group ).
• Bluetooth SIG ( Special Interest Group ).
-- These above use radio wave ,frequency band
of around 2.4 GHz.
• IrDA ( InfraRed Data Association )
-- Uses infrared instead of radio waves.
Piconet
• A general purpose, low-powered, ad-hoc
network.
• It allows two devices near each other to
inter-operate.
• These devices can be either mobile or fixed.
• The range is said to be reasonably short.
Home radio frequency
Uses Shared Wireless Access Protocol (SWAP)
system
• carries both voice and data traffic.
• inter-operate with the PSTN
(Public Switched Telephone Network)
and the Internet.
• the range covers typical home and yard.
IEEE 802.11 wireless lan
The principles of Wireless Local Area Network
(WLAN) are defined in IEEE 802.11 standard.
• It defines two different topologies:
ad-hoc network and infrastructure network.
• This ad-hoc network is able to use only created
wireless connection instead of fixed
infrastructure.
Bluetooth
• The code name for an open specification for
short-range wireless connectivity.
• Effortless, instant wireless connections between
a wide range of communication devices in a small
environment.
• The BT range restricts the environment to about
10 meters.
• Used in virtually any mobile device like that can
have Bluetooth radios integrated into them.
IrDA
• In-room cordless peripherals to host-PC.
• Maturity and standardization activities advantage
over radio.
• Line-of-sight requirement disadvantage.
• Based on technology similar to the remote control
devices.
• High-speed short range, point-to-point cordless
data transfer.
Routing protocols
• Self starting and self organizing.
• Minimal network traffic overhead.
• Rapid convergence.
• Multihop and loop-free paths.
Routing protocols falls in two categories:
Re-active
Pro-active
Reactive routing protocol
• Initiative for finding routers does not take place.
• Established routes “ on demand”.
• Save energy and bandwidth during inactivity.
Examples: AODV, DSR, etc.
Pros and Cons :
o Do not use bandwidth except when needed.
o Initial in delay.
Proactive routing protocol
•
•On demand flooding the route with RREP.
• All routes are maintained all the time.
• Low latency, suitable for real time traffic.
Examples : DSDV, OLSR.
Pros and Cons :
o Routes are always available.
o Bandwidth might get wasted due to periodic
updates.
Protocols trade-off
• Proactive protocols
– Always maintain routes .
– Little or no delay for route determination.
– Consume bandwidth to keep routes up-to-date.
– Maintain routes which may never be used.
• Reactive protocols
- Lower overhead since routes are determined on demand.
– Significant delay in route determination.
– Employ flooding (global search).
– Control traffic may be bursty.
Pros and Cons for Manet
PROS:
Separation from central network administration.
Self-configuring nodes are also routers.
Self-healing through continuous re-
configuration.
CONS:
Limited resources and physical security.
Intrinsic mutual trust vulnerable to attacks.
Lack of authorization facilities.
MANET usage areas
• Military Scenario.
• Sensor Network.
• Rescue operation.
• Student on campus.
• Free internet sharing.
• Conference.
Fig :Manet for military
scenario
Fig: Manet for rescue operation
Conclusion
The mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is a collection
of wireless mobile hosts dynamically establishing a
short lived network without the support of a network
infrastructure. In this type of environment, it's
expected that a large number of ad-hoc connections
will exist in the same region without any mutual
coordination. Mobile ad-hoc networks are the future
of wireless networks. Nodes in these networks will
generate both users and application traffic and
perform various network functions.
Future aspects
In future mobile ad-hoc networks will use mobile
routers to provide Internetconnectivity to mobile ad-
hoc users. A mobile router will also allow mobility of
an ad-hoc network, where mobile users may use an
Internet access within an ad-hoc network domain.
Recently, organizations have begun to see potential
for such dynamic networks. Mobile ad-hoc networks
are of increasing interest for a distributed set of
applications, such as distributed collaborative
computing, distributed sensing networks, potential
fourth generation wireless systems, and response to
incidents that destroyed the existing communication
structure.
Reference
• [ 1 ]. D. Johnson and D. Maltz, “Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc
Wireless Networks,” Mobile Computing, T. Imielinski and H. Korth, Ed.,
Kluwer, 1996.
• [2]. C. Perkins and E Royer, “Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector
Routing,” 2nd IEEE Workshop. Mobile Comp. Sys. And Apps, 1999.
•[3]. IEEE Std. 802.11, “Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and
Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications,” 1997.
•[4]. Sridhar Iyer, “Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks”, IIT Bombay.
•[5]. Andreas Tønnesen, “Introduction to MANET”.
•[6]. “Wireless Ad-Hoc Network” – Wikipedia.
•[7]. Md. Mahbubul Alam, And Tanmoon Taz Shetu, “Congestion
control in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (MANETs)”, APRIL 2011
THANK
YOU

More Related Content

PPT
PPTX
Distributed computing
PPTX
Emerging Technologies - Neuromorphic Engineering / Computing
PPTX
Mobile Ad hoc Networks
PPTX
Wireless sensor networks (Yogesh Chandra Fulara)
PPTX
Lms learning management system a game changer
PPTX
Eustress
PPTX
Neuromorphic computing
Distributed computing
Emerging Technologies - Neuromorphic Engineering / Computing
Mobile Ad hoc Networks
Wireless sensor networks (Yogesh Chandra Fulara)
Lms learning management system a game changer
Eustress
Neuromorphic computing

What's hot (20)

PPTX
PPT
security in wireless sensor networks
PPT
Gsm – global system for mobile communication
PPTX
Mobile ad hoc network
PPTX
WIRELESS TRANSMISSION
PPTX
Open shortest path first (ospf)
PPTX
CoAP - Web Protocol for IoT
PPTX
Routing Protocols in WSN
PPTX
MANET in Mobile Computing
PPTX
Ethernet
PPTX
Wifi & 802.11 Standards
PPTX
Wireless application protocol
PPT
Wireless routing protocols
PPTX
AODV (adhoc ondemand distance vector routing)
PPTX
Destination Sequenced Distance Vector Routing (DSDV)
PDF
Routing protocols in ad hoc network
PPTX
Agent discovery& registration
PPTX
PPT on Basic of Gateway
PPTX
CCNA PPT
PPTX
Ad-Hoc Networks
security in wireless sensor networks
Gsm – global system for mobile communication
Mobile ad hoc network
WIRELESS TRANSMISSION
Open shortest path first (ospf)
CoAP - Web Protocol for IoT
Routing Protocols in WSN
MANET in Mobile Computing
Ethernet
Wifi & 802.11 Standards
Wireless application protocol
Wireless routing protocols
AODV (adhoc ondemand distance vector routing)
Destination Sequenced Distance Vector Routing (DSDV)
Routing protocols in ad hoc network
Agent discovery& registration
PPT on Basic of Gateway
CCNA PPT
Ad-Hoc Networks
Ad

Similar to MOBILE Ad-Hoc NETWORK (MANET) (20)

PDF
Mobile computing Mobile Adhoc Networks (MANETs)
PPTX
Delivered Guest Talk in Faculty Development Programme held on 27th July 2017 ...
PPTX
MC Lecture 8 67875667767777775677887.pptx
PDF
8. MANET 9. WSN1.pdf____________________
PPTX
Unit 2 -1 ADHOC WIRELESS NETWORK MOBILE COMPUTING
PPT
Adhoc wireless
PPTX
Manet - The Art of Networking without a Network
PPT
Top schools in noida
PPTX
LECTURE-2 (UNIT 1) adhoc sensor wireless network
PPT
ad-hoc network by divyajyothi
PDF
IT6601 Mobile Computing Unit IV
PPTX
Classifications of wireless adhoc networks
PPTX
Mobile Computing - SARASWATHI RAMALINGAM
PDF
Adhoc & WSN-Unit-I-Ragavan
PPTX
Ioe module 4
PPTX
wireless mesh netowrk Seminar.pptx
PPT
207088 633815660985047486
PPTX
MOBILE COMPUTING Unit 4.pptx
PPSX
Adhoc technologies
PPTX
Wireless technologies
Mobile computing Mobile Adhoc Networks (MANETs)
Delivered Guest Talk in Faculty Development Programme held on 27th July 2017 ...
MC Lecture 8 67875667767777775677887.pptx
8. MANET 9. WSN1.pdf____________________
Unit 2 -1 ADHOC WIRELESS NETWORK MOBILE COMPUTING
Adhoc wireless
Manet - The Art of Networking without a Network
Top schools in noida
LECTURE-2 (UNIT 1) adhoc sensor wireless network
ad-hoc network by divyajyothi
IT6601 Mobile Computing Unit IV
Classifications of wireless adhoc networks
Mobile Computing - SARASWATHI RAMALINGAM
Adhoc & WSN-Unit-I-Ragavan
Ioe module 4
wireless mesh netowrk Seminar.pptx
207088 633815660985047486
MOBILE COMPUTING Unit 4.pptx
Adhoc technologies
Wireless technologies
Ad

More from Monodip Singha Roy (6)

PPTX
Novel microstrip patch antenna for WLAN and Wi-MAX applications
PPTX
Complementary inverted reactive slot antenna embedded in single
PPTX
SECURE SOCKET LAYER ( WEB SECURITY )
PPTX
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION
DOCX
CHAOS ANALYSIS OF HRV
PPTX
PPT ON WEB SECURITY BY MONODIP SINGHA ROY
Novel microstrip patch antenna for WLAN and Wi-MAX applications
Complementary inverted reactive slot antenna embedded in single
SECURE SOCKET LAYER ( WEB SECURITY )
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION
CHAOS ANALYSIS OF HRV
PPT ON WEB SECURITY BY MONODIP SINGHA ROY

MOBILE Ad-Hoc NETWORK (MANET)

  • 2. CONTENTS • INTRODUCTION • CHARACTERISTICS OF MANET • MECHANISM OF MANET • TRANSMISSION STANDARDS • ROUTING PROTOCOL • PROS AND CONS FOR MANET • MANET USAGE AREAS • CONCLUSION • FUTURE ASPECTS • REFERENCE
  • 3. • Easy to Configure, Rapidly Deployable. • Existing Infrastructure not needed. • Wireless link. • Dynamic topology, Nodes are mobile. • A MANET is a type of Standalone network and also can be connected to an external network.
  • 5. Cellular vs. ad-hoc network Cellular Network Ad-Hoc Network  Infrastructure network.  Infrastructure less network.  Fixed, pre-located cell sites and stations.  No base station and rapid deployment.  Detailed planning before setting up a base station.  Ad-hoc network automatically forms and adapt to changes.  High cost for setup.  Low cost for setup.  Large setup time.  Less setup time.
  • 6. TYPES OF MANET • InVANETs – Intelligent Vehicular ad-hoc network make use of AI to tackle unexpected situation like vehicle collisions and accidents. • VANETs – Vehicular ad hoc network enables effective communication with another vehicle or helps to communicate with roadside equipments. • iMANET– Internet based Mobile ad hoc network helps to link , fixed as well as mobile nodes.
  • 7. Characteristic of MANET •MANET is classified in multihop and mobility. • Mobile nodes are characterized with less memory, weight, power and light features. • Required minimum human intervention to configure the network.
  • 8. Mechanism for manet • Multihop operation required for routing mechanism in different mobile nodes. • Internet access mechanism. • Mechanism to detect and act on , merging of existing network. • Self configuring network requires an address allocation mechanism. • Security mechanism.
  • 9. Transmission standards • Piconet. • Home RF ( Radio Frequency ). • IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN WG ( Working Group ). • Bluetooth SIG ( Special Interest Group ). -- These above use radio wave ,frequency band of around 2.4 GHz. • IrDA ( InfraRed Data Association ) -- Uses infrared instead of radio waves.
  • 10. Piconet • A general purpose, low-powered, ad-hoc network. • It allows two devices near each other to inter-operate. • These devices can be either mobile or fixed. • The range is said to be reasonably short.
  • 11. Home radio frequency Uses Shared Wireless Access Protocol (SWAP) system • carries both voice and data traffic. • inter-operate with the PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network) and the Internet. • the range covers typical home and yard.
  • 12. IEEE 802.11 wireless lan The principles of Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) are defined in IEEE 802.11 standard. • It defines two different topologies: ad-hoc network and infrastructure network. • This ad-hoc network is able to use only created wireless connection instead of fixed infrastructure.
  • 13. Bluetooth • The code name for an open specification for short-range wireless connectivity. • Effortless, instant wireless connections between a wide range of communication devices in a small environment. • The BT range restricts the environment to about 10 meters. • Used in virtually any mobile device like that can have Bluetooth radios integrated into them.
  • 14. IrDA • In-room cordless peripherals to host-PC. • Maturity and standardization activities advantage over radio. • Line-of-sight requirement disadvantage. • Based on technology similar to the remote control devices. • High-speed short range, point-to-point cordless data transfer.
  • 15. Routing protocols • Self starting and self organizing. • Minimal network traffic overhead. • Rapid convergence. • Multihop and loop-free paths. Routing protocols falls in two categories: Re-active Pro-active
  • 16. Reactive routing protocol • Initiative for finding routers does not take place. • Established routes “ on demand”. • Save energy and bandwidth during inactivity. Examples: AODV, DSR, etc. Pros and Cons : o Do not use bandwidth except when needed. o Initial in delay.
  • 17. Proactive routing protocol • •On demand flooding the route with RREP. • All routes are maintained all the time. • Low latency, suitable for real time traffic. Examples : DSDV, OLSR. Pros and Cons : o Routes are always available. o Bandwidth might get wasted due to periodic updates.
  • 18. Protocols trade-off • Proactive protocols – Always maintain routes . – Little or no delay for route determination. – Consume bandwidth to keep routes up-to-date. – Maintain routes which may never be used. • Reactive protocols - Lower overhead since routes are determined on demand. – Significant delay in route determination. – Employ flooding (global search). – Control traffic may be bursty.
  • 19. Pros and Cons for Manet PROS: Separation from central network administration. Self-configuring nodes are also routers. Self-healing through continuous re- configuration. CONS: Limited resources and physical security. Intrinsic mutual trust vulnerable to attacks. Lack of authorization facilities.
  • 20. MANET usage areas • Military Scenario. • Sensor Network. • Rescue operation. • Student on campus. • Free internet sharing. • Conference.
  • 21. Fig :Manet for military scenario
  • 22. Fig: Manet for rescue operation
  • 23. Conclusion The mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is a collection of wireless mobile hosts dynamically establishing a short lived network without the support of a network infrastructure. In this type of environment, it's expected that a large number of ad-hoc connections will exist in the same region without any mutual coordination. Mobile ad-hoc networks are the future of wireless networks. Nodes in these networks will generate both users and application traffic and perform various network functions.
  • 24. Future aspects In future mobile ad-hoc networks will use mobile routers to provide Internetconnectivity to mobile ad- hoc users. A mobile router will also allow mobility of an ad-hoc network, where mobile users may use an Internet access within an ad-hoc network domain. Recently, organizations have begun to see potential for such dynamic networks. Mobile ad-hoc networks are of increasing interest for a distributed set of applications, such as distributed collaborative computing, distributed sensing networks, potential fourth generation wireless systems, and response to incidents that destroyed the existing communication structure.
  • 25. Reference • [ 1 ]. D. Johnson and D. Maltz, “Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks,” Mobile Computing, T. Imielinski and H. Korth, Ed., Kluwer, 1996. • [2]. C. Perkins and E Royer, “Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing,” 2nd IEEE Workshop. Mobile Comp. Sys. And Apps, 1999. •[3]. IEEE Std. 802.11, “Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications,” 1997. •[4]. Sridhar Iyer, “Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks”, IIT Bombay. •[5]. Andreas Tønnesen, “Introduction to MANET”. •[6]. “Wireless Ad-Hoc Network” – Wikipedia. •[7]. Md. Mahbubul Alam, And Tanmoon Taz Shetu, “Congestion control in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (MANETs)”, APRIL 2011