Module 1 Assignment 1.1 Proposed Research TopicQuestionRES.docx

Module 1 Assignment 1.1: Proposed Research Topic/Question
RESEARCH TOPIC QUESTION- A Study on the Impact of
Leadership Style on Job Satisfaction and Performance Levels of
the Employees
After taking a look at the guidelines for the final project (Mini
Qualitative Study, due in Module 10), please submit a brief
description of a proposed topic you can feasibly study through
general qualitative inquiry (an interview, a field observation,
and analyzing some documents or artifacts) during the term.
This means, for example, a topic where you can easily contact
someone for a valuable interview, can readily access the field
(e.g., campus space, etc.) for an observation, and can view
documents or other artifacts relevant to your understanding of
the topic. For instance, a study interviewing multiple college
presidents and observing closed-door state coordinating
committee meetings is probably outside the scope of our work
this term. You might, however, have a contact at your
institution who can grant an interview and share some
documents and recommend public spaces to observe related to a
question about campus leadership more generally.
The purpose of this initial assignment is to propose a topic on
which to focus your work this term, and receive feedback and
guidance as to its feasibility in order to best set you up for
success at the outset of our work together. As a result, you
should submit approximately 500 words outlining the following:
· Research question or topic/focus area
· 3-5 citations of scholarly resources you will use to support
your topic/focus area
· Institution or other setting, specifically, where you will situate
the study
· 3-5 potential interview participants who would best shed light

on the types of information you are seeking to understand
· Types of artifacts, symbols, documents, reports, or other
existing materials you can realistically access to complement
your analysis
While this is a mini qualitative study – intended as a realistic
practice round rather than a high-stakes endeavor – it is not
intended to be your capstone research. Therefore, you should
have a different research question for this project than the one
you developed in HED 650 for your ultimate capstone work.
You are encouraged, though, to consider how the work you do
in RES 654 can add value to your capstone, and whether an
adjacent or tangential topic to explore qualitatively in our class
might be useful.
Assignment requirements:
· Your assignment should be approximately 500 words in length
(typically, two double-spaced pages), not counting cover page,
reference list page, appendices, figures, or tables.
· Your assignment should include a title page and a reference
list page (if using references), and be completed in Times New
Roman 12-point font, double-spaced, with appropriate header,
page numbers, one-inch margins, and meet all other
requirements of APA Stylebook.
· References are not required but if included, please format
them in the most current APA format.
· An abstract is not required.
· Please refer to the rubric associated with this assignment for
detailed guidance about expectations and grading.
Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 29 (2013) 45-
50
1576-5962/$ - see front matter © 2013 Colegio Oficial de
Psicólogos de Madrid. Todos los derechos reservados

Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
www.elsevier.es/rpto Revista de Psicología del
Trabajo y de las Organizaciones
Vol. 29, No. 2, August 2013
ISSN: 1576-5962
Editor
Jesús F. Salgado
Associate Editors
Francisco J. Medina
Silvia Moscoso
Ramón Rico
Carmen Tabernero
Journal of Work and
Organizational Psychology
Authentic leadership and organizational culture as drivers of
employees’ job
satisfaction
Garazi Azanzaa*, Juan Antonio Morianob y Fernando Molerob
aUniversidad de Deusto, Spain
bUNED, Spain
A B S T R A C T
The promotion of a flexibility-oriented organizational culture,
based on support and
innovation, may provide a great value in today’s competitive

economy. This type of organizational
culture may be a breeding ground for authentic leadership,
which, in turn, has positive effects on
employees’ attitudes. This study examines how flexibility-
oriented organizational cultures
facilitate positive outcomes at the employee level through its
impact on authentic leadership.
Multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the data from
571 employees belonging to
several Spanish private organizations. The results show that
authentic leadership partially
mediates the positive relationship between flexibility-oriented
organizational cultures and
employees’ job satisfaction. These findings advance theory on
the integration of organizational
culture in authentic leadership research and provide guidelines
for improving employees’ job
satisfaction.
© 2013 Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid. All rights
reserved.
Liderazgo auténtico y cultura organizacional como impulsores
de la satisfacción
laboral de los trabajadores
R E S U M E N
La promoción de una cultura organizacional orientada a la
flexibilidad, basada en el apoyo y la
innovación, puede ser valiosa en la economía competitiva
actual. Este tipo de cultura organizacional
se presenta como el caldo de cultivo para el liderazgo auténtico,
el cual, a su vez, tiene efectos
positivos en las actitudes de los trabajadores. El objetivo de
este estudio es examinar cómo la

orientación de flexibilidad en las culturas organizacionales
facilita resultados positivos en los
trabajadores a través de su impacto en el liderazgo auténtico. Se
utilizaron análisis de regresión
múltiple para analizar los datos de 571 empleados españoles.
Los resultados muestran que el
liderazgo auténtico media parcialmente la relación entre las
culturas orientadas a la flexibilidad
y la satisfacción laboral. Este estudio contribuye a la extensión
teórica de la investigación sobre el
liderazgo a través de la integración de la cultura organizacional
en la investigación sobre liderazgo
auténtico y proporciona claves para mejorar la satisfacción
laboral de los trabajadores.
© 2013 Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid. Todos los
derechos reservados.
Nowadays companies operate in a very competitive global
environment, punctuated by the financial crisis. Given the rapid
and
substantial changes occurring in the economic environment,
organizations have to adapt to the market and work to become
and
remain competitive. While market forces, competitive
positioning,
strategy, and technology are evidently important, highly
successful
companies have capitalized on the value that resides in
developing
and managing a unique organizational culture. This culture can
be
created by the founder, can emerge over time as an organization
faces challenges and obstacles, or be developed by the
management

to improve their company’s performance (Cameron & Quinn,
2006).
*Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to
Garazi Azanza
Martínez de Luco. Avda. de las Universidades 24. Universidad
de Deusto. 48007
Bilbao. E-mail: [email protected]
Keywords:
Authentic leadership
Organizational culture
Job satisfaction
Palabras clave:
Liderazgo auténtico
Cultura organizacional
Satisfacción laboral
A R T I C L E I N F O R M A T I O N
Manuscript received: 11/03/2013
Revision received: 01/08/2013
Accepted: 01/08/2013
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/tr2013a7
46 G. Azanza et al. / Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology 29 (2013) 45-50
In this context, people are more and more interested in working
in companies with a flexible organizational culture, in which it
has
been found that employees show higher levels of job
satisfaction

(e.g., Lund, 2003; McKinnon, Harrison, Chow, & Wu, 2003;
Silverthorne, 2004). Furthermore, flexibility-oriented
organizational
cultures, by focusing on the support and development of
employees
and the promotion of innovation, may provide a competitive
advantage to face the economic crisis. However, this flexible
perspective is a challenge for companies that hold a traditional
culture, commonly based on control, rigid structures, and
hierarchy.
Therefore, analyzing the leadership style that could grow in
flexibility-oriented cultures and have a positive impact on
employees
will provide some guidelines for the companies to improve their
efforts towards innovation and employee development. Thus, in
this
study, flexibility-oriented culture is presented as a breeding
ground
for authentic leadership (Avolio & Gardner, 2005; Avolio,
Gardner,
Walumbwa, Luthans, & May, 2004; Gardner, Avolio, Luthans,
May, &
Walumbwa, 2005; Luthans & Avolio, 2003), a positive form of
leadership that has been found to be related to follower positive
outcomes (e.g., Moriano, Molero, & Lévy-Mangin, 2011;
Peterson,
Walumbwa, Avolio, & Hannah, 2012; Wong & Laschinger,
2012).
The aim of this article is twofold. First, we examine the
relationship
between organizational culture and authentic leadership, which
has
not been previously examined in the authentic leadership
literature.
Second, we analyze the mediating role of authentic leadership

in the
relationship between organizational culture and job satisfaction.
Organizational culture
Organizational culture is defined as “the set of key values,
assumptions, understandings, and norms that is shared by
members
of an organization and taught to new members as correct” (Daft,
2005, p. 422). Organizational culture has been associated with
job
satisfaction and employee retention (Macintosh & Doherty,
2010;
Park & Kim, 2009), leadership behavior (Tsai, 2011), and
organizational
effectiveness (Gregory, Harris, Armenakis, & Shook, 2009).
Given
these relationships, organizational culture appears to permeate
every facet of the organization.
In this study, organizational culture is considered on the basis
of
Quinn and Rohrbaugh’s (1983) competing values model. This
model
consists of two dimensions with contrasting poles: internal vs.
external orientation and flexibility vs. control. The first
dimension
reflects the organization’s point of view. The focus can be
internally
directed, when the central issue of the organization is the
organization
itself, its processes or its people, or, on the other hand,
externally
directed, when the central issue is the relation of the
organization
with the market. The second dimension measures the flexibility,

the
tendency towards decentralization and differentiation, and on
the
opposite pole the control, i.e., stability and order as the central
issues. The combination of both dimensions creates four
organizational culture orientations: support, innovation, rules
and
goal orientation (Van Muijen et al., 1999).
The flexibility dimension is particularly relevant to the
discussion
of culture and its effects on employees’ well-being and
leadership
processes. In fact, organizational development interventions are
designed to create flexible organizations, empower line
employees,
and increase the quality of work life (Bennis, 1969; Burke,
1994).
Thus, this study focuses on the flexibility dimension of
organizational
culture described by Quinn and Rohrbaugh (1983).
Following this model, flexibility-oriented cultures encompass
innovation orientation, characterized by openness to new ideas,
and
support orientation, characterized by personal confidence and
support for development (Van Muijen et al., 1999). These
cultures are
characterized by spontaneity, change, openness, and
responsiveness
and are based on adaptability and readiness to achieve growth,
innovation, and creativity (Henri, 2006).
Authentic leadership
As Schein (1985) pointed out, organizational culture provides a

system of expectancies that sets norms and a standard of
behavior
for employees, providing a reason for leadership behavior.
Thus, a
relationship between authentic leadership and organizational
cultures that are in line with authentic leadership may be
expected.
Authentic leadership is defined as “a process that draws from
both positive psychological capacities and a highly developed
organizational context, which results in both greater self-
awareness
and self-regulated positive behaviors on the part of leaders and
associates, fostering positive self-development” (Luthans &
Avolio,
2003, p. 243). Thus, an authentic leader shows hope, trust,
positive
emotions, optimism, relational transparency, and a moral and
ethical
orientation towards the future (Avolio et al., 2004). Walumbwa,
Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, and Peterson (2008) identified and
validated four components to describe authentic leadership:
self-
awareness, which refers to understanding not only their own
strengths and limitations, but how they affect others; balanced
processing, which involves analyzing all relevant information
objectively before coming to a decision; relational transparency,
which refers to openly sharing the authentic self, their true
thoughts
and feelings to followers; and internalized moral perspective,
which
refers to self-regulation guided by internal moral standards and
values.
Previous studies have examined the relationship between
authentic leadership and various organizational outcomes,

finding
that authentic leadership was positively related to employees’
job
performance (Peterson et al., 2012) and job satisfaction
(Bamford,
Wong, & Laschinger, 2012), followers’ commitment (Leroy,
Palanski,
& Simons, 2012), work engagement (Walumbwa, Wang, Wang,
Schaubroeck, & Avolio, 2010), employees’ organizational
citizenship
behavior (Edú, Moriano, Molero, & Topa, 2012), and
employees’ extra
effort, (Moriano et al., 2011), among others.
The authentic leadership model by Luthans and Avolio (2003)
included the positive psychological capacities and a positive
organizational context as antecedents of the authentic
leadership.
Regarding the context in which authentic leadership is
developed,
the authors highlighted the importance of organizational
context,
including organizational vision, strategy, and culture as
antecedents
of authentic leadership development and characterizing this
organizational culture as an authentic, mature, and highly
developed
culture which would motivate and support optimal leadership
development (Luthans & Avolio, 2003). As far as we know,
however,
the influence of organizational culture on authentic leadership
remains unexplored.
Regarding the relationship between flexibility-oriented cultures
and authentic leadership, through honest and transparent
relations

with employees, the internal characteristics of authentic leaders
that
are supposed to stimulate employees’ creativity and
innovativeness
may be perceived by others. Thus, we suggest that in a highly
innovative organizational culture we are likely to see authentic
leaders who foster innovative behavior on followers. Moreover,
support-oriented cultures value and respect participation,
collaboration, egalitarianism, and interpersonal relationships
(Maier,
1999). Those values may be shared among employees through
authentic leadership and the relational transparency of the
authentic
leader may serve as a catalyst to foster the support and positive
development of employees.
Therefore, analyzing organizational cultures focused on
innovation and support and their relationship with authentic
leadership and their positive effects on employees can provide
the
key for today’s human resources management. Hence, the
following
hypothesis is proposed:
H1: Flexibility-oriented cultures will be positively related to
authentic leadership.
G. Azanza et al. / Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology 29 (2013) 45-50 47
Job satisfaction
For organizations and managers, the interest in satisfaction
comes from its relationship with work-related behaviors and job

performance (Judge, Thoresen, Bono, & Patton, 2001; Riketta,
2008). Job satisfaction is defined as “the pleasurable emotional
state resulting from the perception of one’s job as fulfilling or
allowing the fulfillment of one’s important job values” (Locke,
1976, p. 1342).
Regarding organizational culture, the effect that different types
of
organizational culture or cultural dimensions have on job
satisfaction
has been previously examined. For instance, Lund (2003), based
on
Cameron and Quinn’s (1999) typology of cultures, identified a
positive relationship between flexibility and internally oriented
cultures and job satisfaction and a negative relationship
between
control and externally oriented cultures. Similarly, Silverthorne
(2004) found that job satisfaction is more likely when culture is
supportive, then when it is innovative and finally when it is
bureaucratic. In the same way, McKinnon et al. (2003)
suggested that
respect for people, innovation, and stability had a positive
effect on
job satisfaction.
Despite these studies, the relationship between organizational
culture and job satisfaction is still unclear and there is a lack of
empirical evidence to suggest a strong link between these
variables.
Nevertheless, we suggest that, in line with previous research,
certain
cultural orientations, such as flexibility orientation, which
includes
innovation and support, may predict job satisfaction through its
impact on authentic leadership. Thus, the following hypothesis
is

proposed:
H2: Flexibility-oriented cultures will be positively related to
job
satisfaction.
Among the diverse outcome variables of leadership, job
satisfaction has been widely related to authentic leadership in
scientific literature. For example, in a study conducted in 11
multinationals Walumbwa et al. (2008) found that followers’
perception of authentic leadership of their supervisors was
positively related to followers’ job satisfaction. More recently,
Giallonardo, Wong, and Iwasiw (2010) examined this
relationship
in a sample of 170 graduate nurses finding that nurses paired
with
leaders perceived as authentic, feel more engaged and are more
satisfied. Similarly, a positive relationship between authentic
leadership and job satisfaction was found by Wong and
Laschinger
(2012) in a sample of 280 nurses. Consequently, the following
hypothesis is proposed:
H3: Authentic leadership will be positively related to
employees’
satisfaction.
The ability to understand and work within an organizational
culture has been considered a condition for leadership
effectiveness
(Hennessey, 1998). Leaders must deeply understand the
organizational culture to communicate and implement new
visions
and inspire follower commitment to the vision (Schein, 1990).
Leaders facilitate the accomplishment of goals that otherwise
may

not have been attempted and encourage the need for change
(Rousseau, 1996; Schein, 1985; Trice & Beyer, 1993) and,
therefore,
they may be the key to foster the development of certain types
of
culture through their impact on followers’ positive attitudes.
A flexibility-oriented culture may be found in the positive
organizational context defined by Luthans and Avolio (2003) as
the
framework in which authentic leadership development occurs.
In
this context, authentic leaders may have the ability to
understand
and share the values of a flexibility-oriented culture,
specifically
those aspects related to follower development and the promotion
of
new ideas through balanced processing. Thus, an authentic
leader
may emerge in flexibility-oriented cultures due to the shared
values
of the organization and the leader and an authentic leader
would, in
turn, facilitate the accomplishment of the cultural values
through
his/her impact on employees’ job satisfaction. Therefore, we
suggest
that flexibility-oriented culture has a positive, indirect effect on
job
satisfaction through authentic leadership.
H4: Authentic leadership will mediate the relationship between
flexibility-oriented organizational culture and employees’ job
satisfaction.

Method
Sample
The sample consisted of 571 employees from 114 Spanish
private
companies belonging to different sectors: industry (20%), trade
(17.9%), IT (9.5%), scientific, and technical activities (8.8%),
health
(7.9%) and administration (6.2%), among others. The companies
were
small (60.8%), medium (26.1%), and large (13.1%). In this
sample,
53.8% of the participants were female, the average age was
35.62
years (SD = 8.61), and the average seniority was 7.85 years (SD
=
7.32); 41.7% of participants had a college degree and 21.9%
were
graduated from vocational school.
Measures
Organizational culture. We used the Spanish version (González-
Romá, Tomás, & Ferreres, 1995) of the FOCUS 93
questionnaire (Van
Muijen et al., 1999), which assesses how frequent certain
situations
in your workplace are. Flexibility-oriented culture was
measured
with 4 items from the support scale (e.g., “How often do
management
practices allow freedom in work?”, α = .80) and 9 items from
the
innovation scale (e.g., “How often does your organization

search for
new markets for existing products?”, α = .82). A six-point
Likert scale
from 1 (never/nobody) to 6 (always/everyone) was employed.
The
alpha coefficient for this study was .85.
Authentic leadership. This variable was measured using the 13-
item Spanish adaptation (Moriano et al., 2011) of the Authentic
Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) developed by Walumbwa et al.
(2008), assessing relational transparency, internalized moral
perspective, balanced processing, and self-awareness. A sample
item
is “My leader says exactly what he or she means”. A seven-
point
Likert scale from 1 (never) to 7 (always) was employed. The
alpha
coefficient for the ALQ in this study was .91.
Job satisfaction. A seven-item scale dealing with several aspects
of
employees’ job satisfaction (e.g., co-workers, work conditions,
and
salary) was used. A version of this scale was used previously in
other
studies showing a good reliability (Molero, Cuadrado, Navas, &
Morales, 2007). A sample item is “I am satisfied with my
salary”. A
seven-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly dissatisfied) to 7
(strongly
satisfied) was employed. The alpha coefficient for this scale in
the
current study was .87.
Socio-demographic data. The following socio-demographic data
were collected: age, gender (coded as 1 = male and 2 = female),

educational level (coded as 1 = primary education, 2 =
secondary
education, 3 = vocational training, 4 = graduate degree),
organizational size (coded from 1 = micro to 4 = large,
depending on
the number of employees), seniority, and years working with the
same leader.
Procedure
Employees belonging to working groups with the same leader
were asked to complete a questionnaire. The number of
participants
per work team ranged between 3 and 6 (not including the
manager
or supervisor) and the mean was 4.97 employees per work team
(SD
= 0.36). Subjects participated on a voluntary basis and were
assured
confidentiality. IBM Statistics SPSS (version 21) was used to
analyze
our data.
Psychology 29 (2013) 45-50
Results
Since we collected all data in a cross-sectional survey,
Harman’s
single factor test (Harman, 1967) was carried out to address the
issue
of common method variance (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, &
Podsakoff,

2003). While one factor contributing to more than 50% of total
variance is considered an indication of common method bias,
the
first factor in our analysis accounts for only 35% of the total
variance.
This suggests that common method bias is not likely to be a
serious
problem with this data.
The descriptive results (Table 1) revealed medium levels of
authentic leadership perceived by the employees in their leaders
(M
= 4.25, SD = 1.20). The correlations between the variables of
the study
were calculated, obtaining significant and positive relationships
between flexibility-oriented culture and authentic leadership (r
=
.59, p < .01) and job satisfaction (r = .53, p < .01), and between
authentic leadership and job satisfaction (r = .55, p < .01). Few
relationships were found between the demographics and the
study
variables. Business size was found to be related to authentic
leadership (r = .10, p < .05) and job satisfaction (r = .15, p <
.01).
Although the variables in our study were highly correlated,
statistical
checks suggest multicollinearity is not a significant concern
(VIF <
2.5, tolerance > .40; cf., Allison, 1999).
In the first hypothesis, flexibility-oriented culture was
suggested
to be positively related to employees’ perceptions of their
leader’s
authentic leadership. Hierarchical multiple regression revealed
that

37% of the variance in authentic leadership was explained by
flexibility-oriented culture (R2 = .37, F = 56.20, p < .01).
Regarding job satisfaction, authentic leadership and flexibility-
oriented culture were posited to positively predict employees’
job
satisfaction. As shown in Table 2, 32% of the variance in job
satisfaction
was explained by flexibility-oriented culture (R2 = .32, F =
45.87, p <
.01). When authentic leadership was entered into the regression,
flexibility-oriented culture and authentic leadership accounted
for
39% of the variance in job satisfaction (R2 = .39, F = 53.11, p <
.01).
Furthermore, flexibility-oriented culture and authentic
leadership
were both significant predictors of job satisfaction (β = 0.35, t =
8.49, p
< .01 and β = 0.33, t = 8.97, p < .01), supporting Hypotheses 2
and 3.
In the fourth hypothesis, it was proposed that authentic
leadership
mediates the relationship between flexibility-oriented cultures
and
job satisfaction. According to Baron and Kenny (1986), four
conditions
are required to establish mediation: (1) the independent and
mediating variables must be significantly related, (2) the
independent
and dependent variables must be significantly related, (3) the
mediator and dependent variable must be significantly related,
and
(4) the relationship between the independent variable and
dependent

variable should be non-significant or weaker when the mediator
is
added.
In the present study, flexibility-oriented culture was positively
related to authentic leadership (β = 0.60, p < .01); thus,
condition (1)
and Hypothesis 1 were supported. Flexibility-oriented culture
was
positively and significantly related to job satisfaction (β = 0.55,
p < .01) and thus, supported condition (2) for mediation and
Hypothesis 2. Authentic leadership was positively related to job
satisfaction (ß = .33, p < .01) and thus, supported condition (3)
and
Hypothesis 3. Furthermore, results show that after authentic
leadership was taken into account the effects of flexibility-
oriented
culture (ß = .35, p < .01) became weaker, albeit still significant,
which
suggests partial mediation (Table 2). To further assess the
significance
of the mediation, a Sobel test (1982) was applied (Sobel test: z
= 8.99,
p < .001, MacKinnon et al., 2002). Results show that the
mediating
effect of authentic leadership for flexibility-oriented culture and
job
satisfaction was significant. Thus, Hypothesis 4 was partially
supported.
Discussion
The aim of this study was to examine how flexibility orientation
in organizational cultures facilitates positive outcomes at the
employee level through its impact on authentic leadership. The
findings confirm that flexibility-oriented cultures exert their

positive
effects on employees’ job satisfaction through partially
authentic
leadership.
Table 1
Means, standard deviations and correlation coefficients of the
study variables (N = 571)
M (SD) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Gender (1 = male) 1.54 (0.49)
2. Age 35.62 (8.61) -.068
3. Education 3.60 (1.58) -.004 -.085*
4. Business size 2.12 (1.08) -.018 -.128** -.116**
5. Seniority 7.85 (7.32) -.157** .650** -.056 -.224**
6. Years with leader 4.81 (4.74) -.111** .353** -.065 .113**
.562**
7. Flexibility-oriented culture 4.18 (0.98) .009 .042 .022 -.074
.046 .017
8. Authentic leadership 4.25 (1.20) .021 -.005 -.032 .107* -.003
.012 .592**
9. Job satisfaction 4.74 (1.15) .051 -.008 .010 .150** -.007 .041
.537** .556**
* p < .05, ** p < .01
Table 2

Linear regression model on job satisfaction
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Variables B B B
Gender 0.059 0.054 0.048
Age -0.0013 -0.026 -0.017
Education level 0.031 0.022 0.031
Seniority 0.031 0.017 0.009
Years with leader 0.013 0.006 0.015
Company size 0.157** 0.195** 0.141**
Flexibility-oriented culture --- 0.551** 0.350**
Authentic leadership --- 0.334**
R2 0.027 0.328 0.398
Adjusted R2 0.018 0.321 0.390
∆R2 0.027* 0.301** 0.070**
Note. Standardized coefficients reported: * = p < 0.01, ** = p <
0.001.
G. Azanza et al. / Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology 29 (2013) 45-50 49

Organizational culture literature has underlined the role of
leaders in maintaining particular types of culture (Schein, 1985)
and
fostering organizational change through the knowledge of
organizational culture (Brooks, 1996). In addition, the literature
on
leadership points out that understanding and working within a
culture fosters leadership effectiveness (Block, 2003).
Specifically,
authentic leadership flows through to the followers and finally
becomes part of the fabric of the organizational culture (May,
Chan,
Hodges, & Avolio, 2003), and it may be the key to foster job
satisfaction in flexibility-oriented cultures.
Our first hypothesis examined the relationship between
organizational culture and authentic leadership by finding that
employees’ reported levels of flexibility-oriented culture were
related
to the perception of their leader’s authentic leadership.
Furthermore,
flexibility-oriented culture was related to job satisfaction,
supporting
our second hypothesis. Regarding authentic leadership, those
employees who perceived their leaders to be more authentic also
reported higher levels of job satisfaction, supporting our third
hypothesis. These findings suggest that the promotion of a
flexibility-
oriented culture in which leaders provide a context for
cooperation
and support could provide a great value due to its relationship
with
authentic leadership, which, in turn, produces positive effects
on
followers and organizations, such as job satisfaction.

Supporting our fourth hypothesis, a mediating effect of
authentic
leadership on the relationship between flexibility-oriented
organizational culture and satisfaction was found. These
findings
could mean that the effects of certain types of cultures are
expressed
through the leadership that embodies the values of a culture. An
authentic leader fosters the effects of flexibility-oriented
culture on
employees due to the shared values of the organization and the
leader. This proposition has implications for organizational
culture
and authentic leadership development: hiring or training
authentic
leaders would enhance employees’ job satisfaction in
flexibility-
oriented organizations.
Regarding the control variables, employees from large
organizations reported higher levels of job satisfaction. These
results
are in line with the statements made by Goldschmidt and Chung
(2001), who proposed that employees in large organizations
tend to
be more satisfied with the facets of pay and promotion.
The results support the mediating role of authentic leadership in
the relationship between flexibility-oriented culture and job
satisfaction, which has been largely related to job performance
(Judge et al., 2001; Riketta, 2008). Thus, this study contributes
to a
theoretical extension of the research on leadership through the
integration of organizational culture in the research on authentic
leadership, which has not been sufficiently explored in the past,
and

serves as a stimulus for future research.
As a limitation of this study, the exclusive use of self-report
measures to analyze the variables should be noted. Self-reported
data contain several potential sources of bias that should be
noted as
limitations, such as social desirability, and inflation of the
observed
relationship between the measured constructs (Podsakoff et al.,
2003). It is essential for the development of research in this
area to
include objective measures that affect organizations. Therefore,
future research should analyze how these relationships have an
impact on business objectives and indicators of job
performance,
absenteeism and sales, among others. Another limitation of the
present study is that job satisfaction was the only outcome
variable
examined. It would be interesting to analyze other outcomes.
Performance and unit effectiveness would be particularly
interesting
to investigate in future studies in order to assess the effects of
flexibility-oriented culture and authentic leadership on
employees
and organizations.
Given our results and the highly competitive nature of today’s
economy, which highlights the increasing value of human
capital as
a key element in organizational growth, this study provides a
framework for understanding the context in which authentic
leadership occurs and its effects on followers by offering
guidelines
for promoting employees’ job satisfaction.

Conflicts of interest
The authors of this article declare no conflicts of interest.
References
Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership
development: getting to the
root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly,
16, 315-338. doi:
10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., &
May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking
the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders
impact follower
attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823.
doi: 10.1016/j.
leaqua.2004.09.003
Bamford, M., Wong, C. A., & Laschinger, H. (2012). The
influence of authentic leadership
and areas of worklife on work engagement of registered nurses.
Journal of Nursing
Management, 21, 529-540. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-
2834.2012.01399.x
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator
variable distinction in
social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and
statistical considerations.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
doi: 10.1037/0022-

3514.51.6.1173
Bennis, W. G. (1969). Organization development: Its nature,
origins, and prospects.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Block, L. (2003). The leadership-culture connection: An
exploratory investigation.
Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 24, 318-34.
doi:
10.1108/01437730310494293
Brooks, I. (1996). Leadership of a cultural change process.
Leadership and Organization
Development Journal, 17(5), 31-37. doi:
10.1108/01437739610127496
Burke, W. W. (1994). Diagnostic models for organization
development. In A. Howard &
Associates (Eds.), Diagnosis for organizational change:
Methods and models (pp. 53-
84). New York: Guilford Press.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and
changing organizational culture:
Based on the competing values framework. Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1993). The role of culture
compatibility in successful
organizational marriage. Academy of Management Executive,
7(2), 57-70. doi:
10.5465/AME.1993.9411302324
Daft, R. L. (2005). The leadership experience. Mason, OH:
Thompson.

Dovey, K., & Fenech, B. (2007). The role of enterprise logic in
the failure of organizations
to learn and transform. Management Learning, 38, 573-590. doi:
10.1177/1350507607083208
Edú, S., Moriano, J. A., Molero, F., & Topa, G. (2012).
Authentic leadership and its effect
on employees’ organizational citizenship behaviours.
Psicothema, 24, 561-566.
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., &
Walumba, F. O. (2005). Can you see
the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and
follower development. The
Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343-372. doi:
10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003
Giallonardo, L. M., Wong, C. A., & Iwasiw, C. L. (2010).
Authentic leadership of
preceptors: predictor of new graduate nurses’ work engagement
and job
satisfaction. Journal of nursing management, 18, 993-1003. doi:
10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01126.x
Goldschmidt, N., & Chung, B. G. (2001). Size does matter: The
effect of organizational
size on customer satisfaction. Journal of Quality Management,
6(1), 47-60. doi:
10.1016/S1084-8568(01)00028-1
González-Romá, V., Tomás, I., & Ferreres, A. (1995). Análisis
de las propiedades
psicométricas del cuestionario de clima organizacional FOCUS-
93 en una muestra
multiprofesional [Analysis of the psychometric properties of the

FOCUS-93
organizational climate questionnaire in a multiprofessional
sample]. Revista de
Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 11(30), 5-18.
Gregory, B. T., Harris, S. G., Armenakis, A. A., & Shook, C. L.
(2009). Organizational
culture and effectiveness: A study of values, attitudes, and
organizational outcomes.
Journal of Business Research, 62, 673-679. doi:
10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.021
Harman, H. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Hennessey, J. T. (1998). “Reinventing” Government: Does
Leadership Make the
Difference? Public Administration Review, 58: 522–32. doi:
10.2307/977579
Henri, J. F. (2006). Organizational culture and performance
measurement systems.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(1), 77-103. doi:
10.1016/j.aos.2004.10.003
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K.
(2001). The job satisfaction-job
performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Psychological
Bulletin, 127, 376-407. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376
Leroy, H., Palanski, Y., & Simons, T. (2012). Authentic
leadership and behavioral
integrity as drivers of follower commitment and performance.
Journal of Business
Ethics, 107, 255-264. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1036-1

Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction.
In M.D. Dunnette & L. M.
Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational
psychology (pp. 1319-1328).
Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Lund, D. B. (2003). Organizational culture and job satisfaction.
The Journal of Business
& Industrial Marketing, 18, 219-237. doi:
10.1108/0885862031047313
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A
positive developmental
approach. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton & R. E. Quinn (Eds.),
Positive organizational
scholarship (pp. 241–261). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Psychology 29 (2013) 45-50
MacIntosh, E. W., & Doherty, A. (2010). The influence of
organizational culture on job
satisfaction and intention to leave. Sport Management Review,
13(2), 106-117. doi:
10.1016/j.smr.2009.04.006
Maier, M. (1999). On the gendered substructure of organization:
Dimensions and
dilemmas of corporate masculinity. In G. N. Powell (Ed.),
Handbook of gender &
work (69-93). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
May, D. R., Chan, A. Y. L., Hodges, T. D., & Avolio, B. J.

(2003). Developing the moral
component of authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics,
32, 247-260. doi:
10.1016/S0090-2616(03)00032-9
McKinnon, L. J., Harrison, L. G., Chow, W. C., & Wu, A.
(2003). Organizational culture:
Association with commitment, job satisfaction, propensity to
remain, and
information sharing in Taiwan. International Journal of
Business Studies, 11(1), 25-
44.
Molero, F., Cuadrado, I., Navas, M., & Morales, F. J. (2007).
Relations and effects of
transformational leadership: A comparative analysis with
traditional leadership
styles. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 358-368.
Moriano, J. A., Molero, F., & Lévy-Mangin, J. P. (2011).
Liderazgo auténtico. Concepto y
validación del cuestionario en España [Authentic leadership.
Concept and validation
of the ALQ in Spain]. Psicothema, 23, 336-341.
Park, J., & Kim, T. H. (2009). Do types of organizational
culture matter in nurse job
satisfaction and turnover intention? Leadership in Health
Services, 22(1), 20-38. doi:
10.1108/17511870910928001
Peterson, S. J., Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., & Hannah, S.
T. (2012). The relationship
between authentic leadership and follower job performance: The
mediating role of
follower positivity in extreme contexts. The Leadership

Quarterly, 23, 502–516. doi:
10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.004
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N.
P. (2003). Common method
biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature
and recommended
remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
doi:10.1037/0021-
9010.88.5.879
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of
effectiveness criteria: Towards
a competing values approach to organizational analysis.
Management Science, 29,
363-377. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363
Riketta, M. (2008). The causal relation between job attitudes
and performance: A
meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology,
93, 472-481. doi:
10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.472
Rousseau, D. M. (1996). Changing the Deal While Keeping the
People. Academy of
Management Executive, 10(1), 50–61. doi:
10.5465/AME.1996.9603293198
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Bass.
Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American
Psychologist, 45, 109–119.
Sheridan, J. E. (1992). Organizational culture and employee
retention. Academy of

Management Journal, 35, 1036-1056. doi: 10.2307/256539
Silverthorne, C. (2004). The impact of organizational culture
and person-organization
fit on organizational commitment and job satisfaction in
Taiwan. Leadership &
Organization Development Journal, 25, 592-599. doi:
10.1108/01437730410561477
Trice, H. M., Beyer, J. M. (1993). The Culture of Work
Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Van Muijen, J. J., Koopman, P., De Witte, K., De Cock, G.,
Susanj, Z., Lemoine, C., & Turnipseed,
D. (1999). Organizational culture: The focus questionnaire.
European Journal of Work
and Organizational Psychology, 8, 551-568. doi:
10.1080/135943299398168
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing T.
S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008).
Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-
based measure.
Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. doi:
10.1177/0149206307308913
Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Wang, H., Schaubroeck, J., &
Avolio, B. J. (2010). Psychological
processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors.
The Leadership
Quarterly, 21, 901-914. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.015
Wong, C. A., & Laschinger, H. K. (2012). Authentic leadership,
performance, and job

satisfaction: the mediating role of empowerment. Journal of
Advanced Nursing. doi:
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06089.x
Copyright of Revista de Psicologia del Trabajo y de Las
Organizaciones is the property of
Colegio Oficial de Psicologos de Madrid and its content may
not be copied or emailed to
multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright
holder's express written permission.
However, users may print, download, or email articles for
individual use.

Module 1 Assignment 1.1 Proposed Research TopicQuestionRES.docx

More Related Content

Similar to Module 1 Assignment 1.1 Proposed Research TopicQuestionRES.docx

More from roushhsiu

Recently uploaded

Module 1 Assignment 1.1 Proposed Research TopicQuestionRES.docx