Multi-cloud integration architecture
3 likes2,434 views
The document discusses the integration architecture for multi-cloud enterprises, emphasizing the trends driving the need for hybrid integration amidst digital transformation. It highlights the challenges and considerations organizations face regarding ownership, migration, privacy, security, and topology when integrating across various cloud environments. Additionally, it suggests that a move towards agile integration architectures is essential to effectively manage cloud-native applications and enhance component collaboration.
Multi-cloud integration architecture
- 1. 0 Integration architecture for the multi-cloud enterprise Kim Clark Integration Architect Hybrid Integration Rob Nicholson Distinguished Engineer Hybrid Integration Webinar: http://ibm.biz/MultiCloudIntegrationArchitectureWebinar
- 2. of “leading-edge” companies believe augmented intelligence is key to improved customer loyalty Source: Forbes insights - Industry-Leading Customer Experiences: How to Identify Opportunities, Bridge Silos and Accelerate Result with augmented Intelligence 69% Think 2018 / 8272 / March 2018 / © 2018 IBM Corporation
- 3. 2 Four primary trends driving the integration market today Increasing need to integrate across a hybrid, multi-cloud environment Digital Transformation driving Increasing need to provide API-led integration across apps and data Increasing need for integration to appeal to the Line of Business Changing application deployment architectures challenging traditional integration architectures
- 4. Hybrid Integration Reference Architecture for Digital Transformation 3 Composing invocations SoR Core Business Operations Empowering Digital teams Systems of Engagement Business logic Mobile Partners SaaS Offerings API Economy IoT XaaS On-Premise Cloudaffinity SoR “Low level” connectivity Surfacing events Data Integration SoR API & Event Management API & Event Management SoR SoR Composing invocations Surfacing events Data Integration “Digital” connectivity Application (traditional) Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..}{..} Int. Int. {..} {..} {..} Application (microservices) {..} Int.{..} {..} {..} Int. SoR Integration Integration Application (traditional) {..} {..} {..} Integration webinar http://ibm.biz/HybridIntRefArchYouTube paper http://ibm.biz/HybridIntRefArch
- 5. synchronous(rest/http,soap/http,…) asynchronous(messaging,events,…) Hybrid Integration Reference Architecture 4 Composing invocations SoR SoR “Low level” connectivity Surfacing events Data Integration SoR API & Event Management API & Event Management SoR SoR Composing invocations Surfacing events Data Integration “Digital” connectivity Application (traditional) Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..}{..} {..} {..} {..} Application (microservices) SoR Integration Integration Application (traditional) {..} {..} {..} Integration batch(bulkAPIs,filetransfer,…) Core Business Operations Empowering Digital teams Systems of Engagement Business logic Mobile Partners SaaS Offerings API Economy IoT XaaS On-Premise Cloudaffinity webinar http://ibm.biz/HybridIntRefArchYouTube paper http://ibm.biz/HybridIntRefArch {..} {..} {..}{..}
- 6. the number of clouds the average enterprise is either using or piloting Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/joemckendrick/2016/02/09/typical-enterprise-uses- six-cloud-computing-services-survey-shows/#69d5a1a4a82b 6 Think 2018 / 8272 / March 2018 / © 2018 IBM Corporation
- 7. trad. on premises SoRSoR SoR SoR Application (traditional) {..} {..} {..} cloud platform cloud platform Application (traditional) {..} {..} {..} Application (traditional) {..} {..} {..} cloud platform Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} private cloud SoR SoR Application (traditional) {..} {..} {..} SoR (SaaS) SaaS platform iPaaS/iSaaS SoR (SaaS) SaaS platform cloud platform Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} cloud platform Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} The multi-cloud challenge
- 8. synchronous(rest/http,soap/http,…) asynchronous(messaging,events,…) batch(bulkAPIs,filetransfer,ETL,…) Traditional on premises SoRSoR SoR SoR Application (traditional) {..} {..} {..} cloud platform cloud platform Application (traditional) {..} {..} {..} cloud platform Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} private cloud SoR SoR Application (traditional) {..} {..} {..} iPaaS/iSaaS SoR (SaaS) SaaS platform cloud platform Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} cloud platform Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} {..} Application (microservices) {..} {..} {..} {..} The multi-cloud challenge Application (traditional) {..} {..} {..} Integration SoR (SaaS) SaaS platform SoR Application (traditional) {..} {..} {..} Integration
- 9. Multi-cloud challenges relating to integration Organizational impact How does the ownership and management of components change? • Do business/application teams gain greater autonomy? • Does the role of operators/administrators change? • Is there more pronounced vertical decoupling of ownership? • Do component boundaries traverse cloud boundaries? • Does it vary depending on the target cloud? • How is the increase in use of SaaS applications embraced Migration and portability How much refactoring is required to move to, and/or between clouds? • Can the integration associated with an application be moved with it (does the application granularity match the integration granularity)? • Is the target platform providing a different level of infrastructure (e.g. moving from VMs to containers?) • Does the move require a refactor to ensure the components adhere to cloud native principles 8 Privacy and Security What are the effects of a distributed privacy and security model? • Are cloud components built on the assumption that they live on the public internet, or are private networks available. • Does one domain own the identity/authentication of customers, partners, employees, operators, and if not, how are they safely and efficiently replicated • Where is authorization managed, and can it be moved to/accessed from other domains? • Are there legislative information domains (GDPR, data sovereignty)? Physical topology What are the physical effect of solutions spanning multiple clouds? • Does the geographical and/or network distance introduce significant latency or reduce bandwidth? • How do messaging and event based transports traverse cloud boundaries especially where persistence is involved? • How do you provide an end to end view of a multi-cloud solution for monitoring and diagnostics?
- 10. Traditional infrastructure (on premises) Traditional infrastructure (on premises) CaaS cloud platform Private cloud (on premises) Migration and portability - example Moving a System of Record to the cloud and its effect on integration SoR SoRSoR IaaS cloud platform SoR SoR SoR SoR SoR
- 11. Modern integration runtimes can be deployed as cloud native applications: 10 The fate of the ESB: Agile Integration Architecture The Enterprise Service Bus evolves into Agile Integration Architecture The same powerful features but managed as a micro-service. Cloud Native Applications demand: Cloud Native Integration Centralized ESB Integration as a lightweight runtime Containerization Application autonomy http://ibm.biz/AgileIntegArchPaper http://ibm.biz/AgileIntegArchWebinar Containerized Stateless Horizontally scalable Pipeline deployed
- 12. asynchronous(messaging,events,…) trad. on premisescloud platform cloud platformcloud platform private cloudSaaS platform iPaaS/iSaaS SaaS platform cloud platform cloud platform The asynchronous backplane (messaging, events) The asynchronous backplane provides reliable message/event storage and a distribution network that can traverse application and cloud boundaries robustly.
- 13. Think 2018 / 8272 / March 2018 / © 2018 IBM Corporation Flexible integration styles Collaboration across users Agile integration Extended Connectivity
- 14. One Platform for Simple, Fast, and Secure Multicloud Integration Think 2018 / 8272 / March 2018 / © 2018 IBM Corporation
- 15. Looking for more information? “The evolving hybrid integration reference architecture” https://ibm.biz/HybridIntRefArch http://ibm.biz/HybridIntRefArchYouTube More information on IBM’s integration products https://www.ibm.com/cloud/integration “Microservices, SOA, and APIs: Friends or enemies?” https://ibm.biz/MicroservicesVsSoa http://ibm.biz/MicroservicesVsSoaWebinar Part 2: Moving to lightweight, agile integration http://ibm.biz/AgileIntegArchPaper Part 1: The fate of the ESB http://ibm.biz/FateOfTheESBPaper