New directions in the psychology of chronic pain management
The document discusses new psychological approaches for chronic pain management, emphasizing the effectiveness of acceptance and mindfulness-based strategies. It highlights that factors like fear reduction and acceptance can improve patient satisfaction and functioning, despite limited evidence supporting traditional medical treatments like opioids and surgery. The importance of cognitive flexibility and values-based action is also stressed as essential to coping with chronic pain.
New directions in the psychology of chronic pain management
1.
New Directions inThe Psychology of Chronic Pain Management Lance M. McCracken, PhD Pain Management Unit Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases & University of Bath Bath UK
Medical Treatments forChronic Pain Short trials of opioids : average 33% pain relief (Turk 2002, Clin J Pain ). Surgery for degenerative lumbar conditions : “There is still insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of surgery on clinical outcomes to draw any firm conclusions.” (Gibson and Waddell, 2006, Cochrane Library ).
4.
Regional Anesthesia : There is “insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of facet joint, epidural, and local injection therapy” for low back pain. (Nelemans et al. 2001, Spine).
5.
Treatment Process in Chronic Low Back Pain Decreased fear and avoidance predict improved mood, interference, and daily activity. Changes in pain or physical capacity accounted for relatively little or no variance in outcomes. McCracken & Gross (1998). J Occupational Rehabil. McCracken, Gross, & Eccleston (2002). Behav Res Ther.
6.
Is Pain ReliefNecessary for Patient Satisfaction? N=62 patients with chronic pain followed in an Anesthesia-based specialty clinic. Strongest predictors of satisfaction: Perceiving evaluation as complete. Feeling the received explanation for treatment. Believing that treatment improved daily activity. McCracken et al. (2002). European Journal of Pain.
7.
Comprehensive Pain Programs14-60% pain reduction. 65% increase in physical activity 66% return to work. 68% reduction in annual healthcare costs. As reviewed in: Gatchel and Okifuji (2006). The Journal of Pain .
8.
History of Psychological Treatments for Chronic Pain Late 1960’s – 1980’s – Operant Behavioral. Early 1980’s to present – Cognitive Behavioral. Most recently – Acceptance-based, Mindfulness-based, and increasingly Contextual approaches.
9.
The “Waves” ofBehavioral and Cognitive Therapy First : application of basic learning principles to behavior change. Second : emphasis on cognitive processes. Third : integration and expansion of behavioral and cognitive approaches in a contextual framework .
10.
“ Third Wave”Therapies Teasdale et al. 2000 Jacobson et al. 2000 Kohlenberg & Tsai, 1991 Linehan 1993 H ayes et a l . 1999 Originators Relapse of Depression after CBT Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Couples Discord Integrative Behavioral Couples Therapy General Functional Analytic Psychotherapy Borderline Personality d/o Dialectical Behavior Therapy General Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Problem area Therapy Approach
11.
12.
“… there islittle empirical support for the role of cognitive change as causal in symptomatic improvements achieved in CBT.” (Longmore & Worrell, 2007)
13.
Randomized Trial ofBehavioral Activation, Cognitive Therapy, and Antidepressant Medication for Major Depression 241 patients randomized Results: Among severely depressed patients BA was comparable to ADM and both outperformed CT. “ These results challenge the assumption that directly modifying negative beliefs is essential for change…” Dimidjian et al. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006; 74: 658-670.
14.
“ The singlemost remarkable fact about human existence is how hard it is for humans to be happy.” (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999)
15.
The ACT modelof Psychopathology Psychological Inflexibility Dominance of the Conceptualized Past and Feared Future Lack of Values Clarity Inaction, Impulsivity, or Avoidant Persistence Attachment to the Conceptualized Self Cognitive Fusion Experiential Avoidance
16.
“ Psychological Inflexibility” Process based in interactions of language and cognition with direct experiences that produce an inability to persist in, or change, a behavior pattern in the service of long term goals or values. From: Hayes et al. Behav Res Ther 2006; 44: 1-25.
17.
Radical Idea! Inmany cases of chronic pain, at least some of the time, CONTROL is not the SOLUTION ; it’s the PROBLEM .
18.
Radical Idea! Itmay be difficult for patients to talk or think their way out of problems based in talking and thinking.
19.
Treatment Processes Acceptance Present focus (mindfulness) Cognitive de-fusion Values-based action Committed action A contextual sense of self
20.
Thought Action Context“ I can’t go on” Stopping Loss of contact With present Cognitive Fusion Experiential Unwillingness Values Failure
21.
Thought Action Contextor “ Psychological Flexibility” “ I can’t go on” Stopping Mindfulness Acceptance Cognitive De-fusion Values-based Action Carrying on
22.
Dimensions of CognitionFused – Overwhelmed by thought content, loss of contact with present situation, behavioral options narrowed. De-fused - Aware of reactions as reactions, contact with wider situation beyond thoughts, access to a range of responses True Untrue Helpful Unhelpful Rational Irrational
23.
In Other WordsThoughts have a dimension of literal truth, or consistency with reality. They also have a dimension of the functions or influences they exert. Cognitive Fusion is the degree to which these influences are exclusive or response narrowing and the degree to which they produce insensitivity and inflexibility.
24.
Cognitive De-fusion Aprocess of altering the role thoughts play in relation to other behavior. Not about changing content of thought. Includes awareness of the process and not merely the content of thinking. Alters impact of, and need to control, thought content.
25.
Acceptance of ChronicPain Processes of flexible and practical action, free from un-necessary restriction by pain. Engagement in activities with pain present. Absence of attempts to limit contact with pain.
26.
Values-Based Action Actionin accord with relatively global desired life consequences. Guided by chosen directions in relation to family, intimate relations, friends, work, health, growth and learning, etc.
27.
Mindfulness Moment-to-moment non-judgementalawareness. A quality of behavior that includes full, flexible, non-defensive, non-reactive, and present-focused contact with experienced events.
28.
Mindfulness from anACT Point of View Contact with the present moment. Acceptance. Cognitive defusion.
29.
Role of Mindfulnessand Acceptance in Chronic pain N = 105 patients at assessment. Completed 0-10 ratings of pain. Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (Brown and Ryan, 2003). British Columbia Major Depression Inventory Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire. Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale. Sickness Impact Profile. From: McCracken, Gauntlett-Gilbert and Vowles. Pain (2007).
ACT for Disabilitydue to Stress and Pain N = 19 health sector workers with daily stress and pain and 3 periods of > 7 days sick leave in the past year Randomized to: Medical Treatment as Usual (MTAU) Four 1-hour sessions of ACT plus MTAU Dahl, Wilson, Nilsson. Behav Ther 2004;35:785-802.
Reliable Change -Continued Number of Domains Improved 7.14 1.65 1.34 Number needed to Treat 14.0 61.4 75.6 Percent Improved 16 70 86 Number of Patients > 3 > 2 > 1
42.
Variance in Improvementsaccounted for by Changes Acceptance and Values * p < .01 Disability Anxiety Depression Outcome β Values β A cceptance ∆ R 2 -.03 -.41* .18* -.02 -.63* .33* -.06 -.36* .17*
43.
A Contextual Analysisof Treatment Providers: Rehab Workers in Singapore N = 98. 76.5% women. 36.7% Nurses, 12.2% Physios, 10.2% OTs, 9.2% Physicians, 9.2% Admin, 22.% other. Age M = 35.45 yrs, sd = 8.9. Years at work M = 8.8, sd = 8.5.
44.
Selected Correlation Results* p < .01; ** p < .001 -.50** Values-based action -.43** Mindfulness -.35** Acceptance Emotional Exhaustion (0-10)
45.
Selected Correlation Results* p < .01; ** p < .001 .52** Values-based action .30* Mindfulness .36** Acceptance General Health (SF-36)
46.
Selected Correlation Results* p < .01; ** p < .001 .66** Values-based action .43** Mindfulness .52** Acceptance Vitality (SF-36)
47.
Selected Correlation Results* p < .01; ** p < .001 .51** Values-based action .40** Mindfulness .74** Acceptance Emotional Functioning (SF-36)
48.
Variance in WorkerFunctioning Explained by Acceptance, Mindfulness, and Values-based Action * P < .001 .61* Emotional Functioning .52* Vitality .25* General Health .31* Emotional Exhaustion ∆ R 2 Criterion Variable
49.
50.
Summary Current analysesof human behavior show us that language and thinking can create great problems for human beings. These analyses also show two ways to help: change in the content or in the context of experience. Contextual processes include acceptance, cognitive defusion, mindfulness, and values.