NSTIC draft charter february 2012

NSTIC STEERING GROUP: NIST'S DRAFT OF CHARTER: February 2012
ASCII VERSION with limited comments

<This is "NSTICdraftCharterFebruary2012.txt" posted at slideshare.net/jamieXML>
<** See the end for production information and editing notes.>
<** All nonnormative text and comments are marked by angle brackets.>

====
RECOMMENDED CHARTER FOR THE IDENTITY ECOSYSTEM STEERING GROUP

1. Identity Ecosystem Steering Group Charter.

The National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC or Strategy),
signed by President Obama in April 2011, acknowledges and addresses a major
weakness in cyberspace - a lack of confidence and assurance that people,
organizations, and businesses are who they say they are online. {NIST fn1: The
full Strategy can be found at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/NSTICstrategy_041511.pd
f} Additionally, in the current online environment, individuals are asked to
maintain dozens of different usernames and passwords, one for each website with
which they interact. The complexity of this approach is a burden to individuals,
and it encourages behavior - such as the reuse of passwords - that makes online
fraud and identity theft easier. At the same time, online businesses are faced
with ever-increasing costs for managing customer accounts, the consequences of
online fraud, and the loss of business that results from individuals'
unwillingness to create yet another account. Moreover, both businesses and
governments are unable to offer many services online, because they cannot
effectively identify the individuals with whom they interact. Spoofed websites,
stolen passwords, and compromised accounts are all symptoms of inadequate
authentication mechanisms. {NIST fn2: Strategy, April 2011, 1. } <** Typo:
footnote 2 should say: "p. 1.">

The Identity Ecosystem envisioned in the NSTIC is an online environment that
will enable people to validate their identities securely, but with minimized
disclosure of personal information when they are conducting transactions. The
vibrant marketplace created by the Identity Ecosystem will provide people with
choices among multiple accredited identity providers, both private and public,
and choices among multiple credentials. For example, imagine that a student
could get a digital credential from her cell phone provider and another one from
her university and use either of them to log-in to her bank's website, her e-
mail, three social networking sites, four online commerce sites, and so on, all
without having to remember dozens of passwords. The added convenience, security,
and privacy provided within the Identity Ecosystem will allow additional
services to be put online to drive greater economic growth. Notwithstanding the
objective to improve identification and authentication in cyberspace for certain
types of transactions, not all Internet activities have such needs. Thus, the
capacity for anonymity and pseudonymity will be maintained in the envisioned
Identity Ecosystem.

A core tenet of the NSTIC is that its implementation must be led by the private
sector. The NSTIC calls for the Federal Government to work collaboratively with
the private sector, advocacy groups, public sector agencies, and other
organizations to improve the processes by which online transactions are
conducted. The Strategy itself was developed with substantial input from both
the private sector and the American public. The National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), which has been designated to establish a National Program
Office to lead the implementation of the NSTIC, recognizes that a strong and
vibrant public-private partnership is necessary to execute the Strategy's vision
in a way that supports the wide range of interactions that occur over the
Internet. As such, NIST is leading the effort to fulfill the NSTIC's call for
government to work in close partnership with the private sector and other
relevant stakeholder groups to, "(Establish a steering group to] administer the
process for policy and standards development for the Identity Ecosystem
Framework in accordance with the Guiding Principles in (the) Strategy. The

steering group will also ensure that accreditation authorities validate
participants' adherence to the requirements of the Identity Ecosystem
Framework." {NIST fn3: Strategy, April 2011, p. 25.}

1.1. Mission. The Mission of the Steering Group shall be to govern and
administer the Identity Ecosystem Framework in a manner that stimulates the
development and sustainability of the Identity Ecosystem. The Steering Group
will always operate in accordance with the NSTIC's Guiding Principles.
1.1.1. Objectives. The activities and work products of the Steering
Group shall be conducted in support of the following objectives:
* Ensure that the Identity Ecosystem and Identity Ecosystem
Framework conform to the four NSTIC Guiding Principles (as detailed in section
1.3).
* Administer the process for policy and standards development and
adoption for the Identity Ecosystem Framework and, where necessary establish
policies standards for the Identity Ecosystem Framework.
* Adopt and, where necessary, establish standards for the
Identity Ecosystem Framework.
* Certify that accreditation authorities validate adherence to
the requirements of the Identity Ecosystem Framework.
1.1.2. Purpose. The purpose of the Steering Group shall be to
develop and administer the process for policy and technical standards
development for the Identity Ecosystem Framework. The Steering Group shall bring
together all of the interested stakeholders, both in private and public sectors,
to confirm that the Identity Ecosystem Framework provides a minimum baseline of
privacy, security, interoperability, and ease-of-use through standards and
policies, without creating unnecessary barriers to entry. The Steering Group
shall facilitate the fulfillment of the NSTIC goals to develop a comprehensive
Identity Ecosystem Framework; build and implement the Identity Ecosystem;
enhance confidence and willingness to participate in the Identity Ecosystem;
and, support the long-term success and sustainability of the Identity Ecosystem.
{NIST fn4: Strategy, April 2011, p. 31.} ¶ The Steering Group shall not be a
standards development body, but rather an organization that promotes the
development of standards and develops policies that serve to accelerate the
development and adoption of the Identity Ecosystem.

1.2. Scope of Activities. The activities of the Steering Group shall be
limited to achievement of the objectives listed in this charter. Additional
activities that are not considered essential to completion of these objectives
may be conducted when determined appropriate through Steering Group consensus.
The scope of the Steering Group's activities is summarized in the sections that
follow.
1.2.1. Adopt and Establish Standards. The Steering Group shall
establish forums and procedures to review applicable standards and adopt those
that support achievement of the NSTIC vision, conform to the Guiding Principles,
and meet other established requirements. Additionally, the Steering Group will
recommend standards be established when gaps are identified. The Steering Group
shall advocate for standards to be established and adopted in a timely manner
and be sufficient to keep pace with emerging technology and market trends.
1.2.2. Develop and Maintain Policies. The Steering Group shall
establish the mechanisms necessary to develop, implement, and maintain policies
that are appropriate for use in the Identity Ecosystem and conform to the NSTIC
Guiding Principles. The Steering Group shall support the timely development and
implementation of policies.
1.2.3. Develop and Maintain Processes for the Accreditation of
Identity Ecosystem Entities. The Steering Group shall develop, foster, and
implement a clear process for accrediting entities within the Identity Ecosystem
as well as develop clear testing and certification criteria by which adherence
to the recommended standards and policies may be measured. ¶ The Steering
Group shall ensure that this accreditation process is applied fairly to all
Identity Ecosystem participants.
1.2.4. Develop and Maintain Identity Ecosystem Operating Procedures.
The Steering Group shall develop, administer, and maintain Identity Ecosystem
Operating Procedures to facilitate interoperability between and among the

Identity Ecosystem participants. Operating Procedures refers to the set of
policies and standards created by the Steering Group as accepted baseline
requirements for participating in the Identity Ecosystem Framework.

1.3. Adherence to the NSTIC Guiding Principles. The Identity Ecosystem
Steering Group, its components, and its members shall at all times operate in
accordance with four Guiding Principles set forth in the NSTIC. They are:
* Identity solutions will be privacy-enhancing and voluntary. The
Identity Ecosystem will be grounded in a holistic, integrated implementation of
the Fair Information Practice Principles to promote the creation and adoption of
policies and standards that are privacy-enhancing, including the preservation of
the capacity to engage in anonymous and pseudonymous activities online. Ideally,
identity solutions within the Identity Ecosystem should preserve the positive
privacy benefits associated with offline identity-related transactions while
mitigating some of the negative privacy aspects. Finally, participation in the
Identity Ecosystem will be voluntary: the government will neither mandate that
individuals obtain an Identity Ecosystem credential nor that companies require
Identity Ecosystem credentials from consumers as the only means to interact with
them. Individuals shall be free to use an Identity Ecosystem credential of their
choice, provided the credential meets the minimum risk requirements of the
relying party, or to use any non-Identity Ecosystem mechanism provided by the
relying party. Individuals' participation in the Identity Ecosystem will be a
day-to-day - or even a transaction-to-transaction - choice.
* Identity solutions will be secure and resilient. Identity
solutions within the Identity Ecosystem will provide secure and reliable methods
of electronic authentication by being grounded in technology and security
standards that are open and collaboratively developed with auditable security
processes. Credentials within the Identity Ecosystem are: issued based on sound
criteria for verifying the identity of individuals and devices; resistant to
theft, tampering, counterfeiting, and exploitation; and issued only by providers
who fulfill the necessary requirements. Identity solutions must detect when
trust has been broken, be capable of timely restoration after any disruption, be
able to quickly revoke and recover compromised digital identities, and be
capable of adapting to the dynamic nature of technology <** Typo: add period to
end of last sentence.>
* Identity solutions will be interoperable. Interoperability
encourages and enables service providers to accept a wide variety of credentials
and enables users to take advantage of different credentials to assert their
identity online. Two types of interoperability are recognized in the Identity
Ecosystem: there will be standardized, reliable credentials and identity media
in widespread use in both the public and private sectors; and if an individual,
device, or system presents a valid and appropriate credential, any qualified
relying party is capable of accepting and verifying the credential as proof of
identity and attributes.
* Identity solutions will be cost-effective and easy to use. The
Identity Ecosystem will promote identity solutions that enable individuals to
use a smaller number of identity credentials across a wide array of service
providers. These identity solutions must be cost-effective for users, identity
and attribute providers, and relying parties. Furthermore, identity solutions
should be simple to understand, intuitive, easy-to-use, and enabled by
technology that requires minimal user training. {NIST fn5: Strategy, April
2011, 25, 11-14. } <** Typo: footnote 2 should say: "pp. 11-14, 25.">

1.4. Operating Principles. The Steering Group shall adhere to the
following four operating principles.
1.4.1. Openness and Transparency. The work of the Steering Group,
including all working groups and committees, shall facilitate broad
participation and be publically accessible. The Identity Ecosystem Steering
Group shall take the following steps to provide openness and transparency in all
its proceedings: <** Typo: correct spelling from "publically" to "publicly," as
in the next bullet point below.>
* All documents, drafts, and minutes of meetings shall be posted
on a publicly available Internet site.
* All meetings of all governing bodies shall be open to public

attendance and leverage virtual attendance options to maximize broad and public
participation.
* Technologies should be leveraged to create user-friendly and
broad avenues for participation in all proceedings and administrative functions.
1.4.2. Balance. The Steering Group shall strive to achieve balanced
representation among all stakeholder groups regardless of their size, financial
status, or sector alignment/affiliation.
1.4.3. Consensus. Consensus - general agreement among members - shall
be a core value of the Steering Group. All processes instituted by the Steering
Group shall require participants to consider all views, proposals and
objections, and endeavor to reconcile them Although positions of leadership,
such as committee chairs, are likely to serve as the primary drivers of
consensus, all Steering Group participants must be (1) cooperative in the
consensus process; (2) constructive; and (3) respectful when providing feedback
or dissenting opinions. In the event that consensus cannot be reached, voting,
by an established method, shall be used to make Steering Group decisions. <**
Typo: insert period to end sentence between "them" and "Although".>
1.4.4. Harmonization. The Steering Group shall encourage harmonization
of standards and policies and shall always strive to recognize the impacts of
policy and standards on all stakeholders in the Identity Ecosystem.

1.5. Membership. Membership in the Steering Group shall be open to
organizations and unaffiliated individuals (Members) that have an interest in
the development of the Identity Ecosystem. A Member organization may have more
than one individual within its organization participate in Steering Group
activities; however, it shall designate only one individual as its
representative for the purposes of voting in Plenary proceedings. ¶ A Member
shall join as a Participating or Observer Member as defined below:
* Participating Members. Participating Members are those stakeholders
who actively participate in the Steering Group and the work of the Plenary, its
Standing Committees, and Working Groups. The criteria for active participation
such as attendance quotas or other measurable conduct shall be defined in the
By-laws. Participating Members shall have a vote in all Plenary proceedings.
* Observing Members. Observing Members are those stakeholders who do
not meet the criteria for active participation, but want to maintain a presence
in the Steering Group. Observing Members may still contribute to the work of the
Plenary, its Standing Committees, and Working Groups, but they shall not be
permitted to vote in Plenary proceedings.

1.6. Organizational Structure. The Steering Group shall be composed of
two bodies: the Identity Ecosystem Plenary and the Identity Ecosystem Management
Council. The Plenary and the Management Council shall be collectively
responsible for achieving the Steering Groups objectives.

1.7. Establishment. The NSTIC, which was signed by President Obama in
April 2011, called for the establishment of a private sector-led steering group
to administer the development and adoption of the Identity Ecosystem Framework.
The Steering Group receives its authority to operate from the active
participation of its membership. . <** Typo: delete double period at end of
last sentence.>
1.7.1. Resources and Duration. The Steering Group shall be
initiated with the support of NIST. Following the initiation period, the
Steering Group will transition to a self-sustaining organization. The Management
Council shall be responsible for managing the Steering Group's resources and
procuring services once the Steering Group is self-sustaining, as necessary..
<** Typo: delete double period at end of last sentence.>

2. Identity Ecosystem Plenary.

Participation in the Plenary shall be open to all Members. The primary
responsibilities of the Plenary shall be to review and recommend technical
standards for adoption establish and maintain the procedures/policies that
govern the Identity Ecosystem, develop, and establish accountability measures to
promote broad adherence to these procedures, and facilitate the ongoing

operation of the Steering Group. The Plenary will consist of Standing
Committees, Working Groups, and individual members. The Participating Members
(as defined in section 1.5 and in associated By-laws) of the Plenary shall be
responsible for voting on recommendations provided by the Standing Committees
and Working Groups and will participate in elections for Management Council
Delegates, Management Council Officers, and the Plenary Chair.

2.1.1. The Plenary Chair. The Plenary shall be headed by the Plenary
Chair. The Chair shall be responsible for directing the actions, managing the
votes, and providing general leadership to the Plenary. Nominees for this
position shall be approved by the Nominations Committee and selected by simple
majority vote of the Participating Members that comprise the Plenary. <** Typo:
correct section number to "2.1".>

2.1.2. Plenary Standing Committees. Standing Committees shall be
responsible for addressing and coordinating ongoing/permanent issues. Standing
Committees shall produce their own charters and voting procedures which shall be
approved by the Management Council. Additional measures may be taken by the
Management Council to provide balanced and experienced representation on the
Standing Committees. All recommendations proposed by the Committees shall be
reviewed and approved by the Privacy Standing Committee prior to submission to
the Plenary for approval. ¶ The designated Standing Committees shall be: <**
Typo: correct section number to "2.2".>
* Policy Coordination Committee. The Policy Coordination Committee
is responsible for coordinating policies to facilitate and promote the
establishment of the Identity Ecosystem and the rules for participation. <**
See sec. 1.2.1.>
* Standards Coordination Committee. The Standards Coordination
Committee is responsible for coordinating, reviewing, and recommending the
adoption of technical standards to facilitate interoperability within the
Identity Ecosystem. <** See sec. 1.2.2.>
* Accreditation Coordination Committee. The Accreditation
Coordination Committee is responsible for coordinating accreditation
requirements for Identity Ecosystem participants. <** See secs. 1.2.3 and 1.3
(third bullet).>
* Privacy Coordination Committee. The Privacy Coordination Committee
is responsible for seeing that other Committees' and Working Groups' work
products adhere to the Privacy-enhancing and Voluntary Guiding Principle. To
that end, this group should have a "gatekeeper" function; meaning no
recommendations on policies, standards or other work products should be reviewed
or approved by the Plenary unless first approved by the Privacy Coordination
Committee. This committee should be staffed by individuals with extensive
experience in the privacy field, and comprising a balance of viewpoints across a
spectrum of experience, including advocacy organizations and the private sector.
<** See sec. 1.3 (first bullet).>
* Nominations Committee. The Nominations Committee is responsible
for evaluating candidate qualifications to serve as the Chair on the Plenary and
Management Council or as a Delegate (Stakeholder group and At-Large). Selection
criteria outlined in this Charter will enable the selection of persons that can
work for the welfare of the Identity Ecosystem as a whole, while minimizing
self-interested conduct that could hinder the effectiveness and legitimacy of
the Steering Group.
The Management Council may establish more Standing Committees as necessary
to accomplish the work of the Steering Group.

<IMMEDIATE AMENDMENT COMMENT: In the second sentence of 2.1.2, add:
"circulated for comment to the Participating and Observing Members
and then" before the words "approved by the Management Council". >

2.1.3. Plenary Working Groups. Members shall establish domain expert
Working Groups as necessary to accomplish the work of the Steering Group.
Working Groups may be proposed by the Plenary or the Management Council and
shall be officially established by the Management Council. Participation in and
meetings of the Plenary Working Groups shall be open to Participating and

Observing Members; however, only Participating Members may vote on work products
and recommendations. ¶ Working Groups shall produce their own charters and
voting procedures which shall be approved by the Management Council. Based on
their work, Working Groups may propose recommendations and work products for
consideration by the Plenary. All recommendations proposed by the Working Groups
shall be reviewed and approved by the Privacy Standing Committee prior to
submission to the Plenary for approval. ¶ The following Working Groups shall
be established by the Plenary and Management Council: <** Typo: correct section
number to "2.3".>
* Usability and Accessibility Working Group. This working group is
responsible for evaluating technologies and identity solutions within the
Identity Ecosystem to confirm that they are easy-to-use and accessible for all
potential users, in accordance with the NSTIC Guiding Principles. <** See sec.
1.3 (fourth bullet).>
* Security Working Group. This working group is responsible for
evaluating technologies and identity solutions within the Identity Ecosystem to
confirm that they meet applicable requirements for confidentiality, integrity,
and availability, and are capable of timely restoration after any disruption.
The work of this group should be conducted in accordance with the NSTIC Guiding
Principle for the security and resilience of identity solutions. <** See sec.
1.3 (second bullet).>
* International Coordination Working Group. This working group is
Responsible for reviewing and, where appropriate, coordinating alignment with
similar international identity standards and policies. <** Typo: decapitalize
the word "responsible".>
Additional Working Groups may be established by the Management Council or
the Plenary as necessary to accomplish the work of the Steering Group.

<IMMEDIATE AMENDMENT COMMENT: In the third sentence of 2.1.3, add:
"circulated for comment to the Participating and Observing Members
and then" before the words "approved by the Management Council".>

3. Identity Ecosystem Management Council.

The Management Council Management Council shall provide guidance to the Plenary
on the broad objectives envisioned by the Strategy; produce workplans to
prioritize work items and monitor progress; procure necessary resources; and
ensure that Steering Group work activities align with the NSTIC Guiding
Principles and Goals.
All recommendations from the Plenary Working Groups and Standing Committees
shall be voted on by the stakeholder group delegates elected to the Management
Council. The voting process will be structured and defined in the Steering Group
By-laws established during the initial meeting of the Steering Group. The
Management Council shall also be the final ratification authority in the
Steering Group.

<IMMEDIATE AMENDMENT COMMENT: Delete the last sentence of section 3
above ("final ... authority"), which may conflict with other rules.>

3.1. Management Council Composition. The Management Council shall be
composed of 14 delegates, who are elected from the stakeholder groups and two
at-large delegates. The Management Council may include additional stakeholder
groups at any time as necessary. ¶ In addition to Management Council
Delegates, the Management Council shall have three (3) officers:
* The Chair: This position shall provide general leadership to the
Management Council; oversee votes, and direct meetings of the Management
Council. The Chair shall be a non-voting officer.
* The Vice-Chair: This position shall assist the Steering Group in
maintaining alignment with NSTIC objectives and the NSTIC Guiding Principles.
The Vice-Chair shall be a non-voting officer.
* The Ombudsman: This position shall be responsible for upholding
the NSTIC Guiding Principles and Steering Group charter, representing and
advocating for consumers or other individuals and underrepresented groups,
safeguarding against individual stakeholder groups exerting excessive influence,

monitoring and reporting on Management Council activities, managing grievances
from the Plenary, and facilitating public comment and citizen outreach. The
Ombudsman shall be a non-voting officer.

3.2. Management Council Selection. The Management Council Delegates and
Officers shall be selected through the following processes:
* Delegates: Management Council Delegates shall be selected through
a general election held within each Stakeholder Group represented in the
Plenary. The nomination of each candidate for the election will be approved by
the Nomination Committee.
* At-Large Delegates: The election or selection process of At-Large
Delegates shall be determined by the Steering Group during its initial meetings,
as with all Management Council Delegates nominees shall be approved by the
Nominations Committee.
* Chair: The Chair of the Management Council shall be selected
through a general election of the Identity Ecosystem Plenary. The nomination of
each candidate for election shall be approved by the Nominations Committee.
* Vice-Chair: This position shall be filled by the Director of the
NSTIC National Program Office
* Ombudsman: This position shall be provided by the Secretariat.
The criteria for selection shall be established by the Management Council.
Management Council positions, selections, elections, and appointments shall
be conducted in accordance with By-laws created by the Steering Group during its
initial meetings.

<IMMEDIATE AMENDMENT COMMENT: Delete the words "during its initial
meetings" in section 3.2 above. Clarifies effect of amendments.>

3.2.1. Delegate Selection Criteria. The Management Council Delegates
(Stakeholder Group and At-Large) shall be selected in accordance with the
following criteria:
* Visionary Capability: Delegates shall be capable of
understanding and contributing to the multi-disciplinary aspects of the Identity
Ecosystem and the specific goals of the Strategy.
* Team Effectiveness: Delegates shall be capable of working
effectively as a team within the scope of the Management Council.
* Outreach: Delegates shall be able to clearly communicate the
actions of the Management Council to their individual Stakeholder Group to
facilitate consensus building and support the work of the Steering Group.
* Expertise: Delegates shall be recognized experts in their
fields of endeavor.
* Commitment: Delegates shall be able to commit to contribute
sufficient time and effort to accomplish Management Council activities.
3.2.2. Stakeholders. For the purposes of Management Council Delegate
selections Members shall self-identify into one of the following 14 stakeholder
groups:
* Privacy & Civil Liberties. This group focuses on the protection
of individuals' privacy and civil liberties.
* Usability & Human Factors. This group focuses on technologies
and solutions that are usable and incorporate the human, cognitive, and social
properties unique to the characteristics of humans.
* Consumer Advocates. This group focuses on addressing the
interests and accessibility of consumers and other individual end-user
populations.
* U.S. Federal Government. This group focuses on the interests of
the departments and agencies that comprise the U.S. Federal Government. Under
its various forms and component programs, the government acts as an identity
provider, attribute provider, and relying party. This group's Management Council
Delegate will be responsible for advocating for the Federal Government as a
Stakeholder; unlike the Vice-Chair who advocates on behalf of the NSTIC itself.
* U.S. State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Government. This
group focuses on the interests of the various state, local, tribal, and
territorial governments that exist within the U.S.
* Research, Development & Innovation. This group focuses on

research, teaching, and technology development in support of the Identity
Ecosystem.
* Identity & Attribute Providers. This group focuses on the
processes and technologies associated with establishing, managing, and securing
digital identities and attributes.
* Interoperability. This group focuses on supporting
interoperability within the Identity Ecosystem, inclusive of Trust Framework
Providers and standards development organizations.
* Information Technology (IT) Infrastructure. This group focuses
on IT infrastructure relevant to the functioning of the Identity Ecosystem,
inclusive of different types of communications and network traffic, as well as
virtual and distributed functions that produce and provide hardware, software,
and IT systems and services.
* Regulated Industries. This group focuses on industries covered
by sector-specific regulations that may be affected by the development of the
Identity Ecosystem Framework.
* Small Business & Entrepreneurs. This group focuses on the
impact of the development of the Identity Ecosystem Framework on small
businesses and individual business owners/operators.
* Security. This group focuses on IT security services that
support the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of identity solutions
* Relying Parties. This group focuses on transaction decisions
based upon receipt, validation, and acceptance of an entity's authenticated
credential(s) and identity attributes.
* Unaffiliated Individuals. This group consists of any individual
who does not self-identify into one of the other stakeholder groups.
The Steering Group shall periodically review the list of designated
stakeholder groups to confirm that it accurately reflects the broad array of
Identity Ecosystem stakeholders and provides balanced representation for all
parties. The Steering Group may add, modify, remove, or otherwise alter the
stakeholder groups as it deems necessary.

4. Secretariat.

The Secretariat shall serve as the administrative body of the Steering Group. In
this role, the Secretariat shall manage the internal operations of the Steering
Group to include human and financial resources, meeting coordination,
communications, and material support and interaction with external
organizations. The Secretariat shall be responsible for maintaining
transparency, openness, and alignment with the Guiding Principles in all
Steering Group operations. The Secretariat shall appoint an individual to act as
the Identity Ecosystem's Ombudsman.

====
Links:
This document: posted at www.slideshare.net/jamieXML > Documents
Definitive NIST Draft Charter (PDF):
http://www.nist.gov/nstic/reports/SG_Draft_Charter.pdf
Mirrored Charter, with internal cites (HTML):
http://j.mp/NSTICchtr >
http://www.nstic.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Charter-Final.htm

<**> Key:
The source text for this document is the NSTIC.US mirror of the NIST draft
Charter text above. No changes have been made to the unmarked substantive
content. However:
(1) Format has been converted to ASCII and cleaned up for search and editing
uses.
(2) {Curly brackets} indicate original NIST footnotes.
(3) <Angle brackets> include this editor's unofficial cross-references and
notes.

"NSTICdraftCharterAugust2012comments.pdf" is a marked-up PDF version of this
document, with line numbers and lots of additional notes and issues, also posted

at www.slideshare.net/jamieXML > Documents.

jamie.clark@oasis-open.org

NSTIC draft charter february 2012

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to NSTIC draft charter february 2012 (20)

More from Jamie Clark (17)

Recently uploaded (20)

NSTIC draft charter february 2012