Context + Methodology 
 Goal to illustrate the crime of foreign bribery based on the 
facts. 
 Analysis of concluded foreign bribery enforcement actions 
between entry into force of Convention and 1 June 2014. 
 Analysis limited to sanctions for foreign bribery and related 
preparatory or participatory offences against 427 individual 
and corporate defendants. 
 Original judgments/settlements available in 58% of cases; 
WGB evaluations a source of information in 40% of cases; 
media or third party reporting relied upon for 2% of cases. 
 Data equally useful to governments and business.
How are cases detected?
Who pays the bribes? 
Only 4% of sanctioned companies 
were SMEs. In 60% of cases, the 
company associated with the 
corrupt transaction had more than 
250 employees.
Which sectors are most at risk? 
Two-thirds of the foreign bribery 
cases occurred in four sectors: 
 Extractive 
 Construction 
 Transportation and storage 
 Information and communication
Which sectors are most at risk? 
Bribes as a percentage of the transaction value per sector
Who is on the receiving end? 
SOE officials were bribed in 27% of cases but received 80.11% of 
total bribes. Heads of state and ministers were bribed in a total of 
5% of cases but received 11% of total bribes.
Where were the bribes paid? 
Two-thirds of bribes 
were paid to officials in 
countries higher on the 
UN Human Development 
Index 
This map shows the countries whose 
public officials received bribes
How and why are bribes paid?
What is the cost of foreign bribery? 
On average, bribes equaled 
10.9% of the transaction value 
and 34.5% of the profits. 
In 41% of cases, sanctions 
ranged from 100-200% of the 
proceeds of the corrupt 
transaction. 
“Every dollar spent on a bribe is a dollar not spent on 
innovation” Brackett Denniston, GE (Launch of OECD 
Foreign Bribery Report, 2 December 2014)
How are cases sanctioned?
Enforcement of foreign bribery laws 
80 individuals were imprisoned after a foreign bribery conviction
Enforcement of foreign bribery laws 
390 investigations are underway in 24 of the 41 
parties to the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention
Conclusions + Next Steps 
 Proposals for both governments and business to enhance 
the fight against foreign bribery, building on findings of the 
report. 
 Scope for further, in-depth analysis and additional horizontal 
studies to build on this first attempt to measure foreign 
bribery. 
 Potential for using this model to analyse other forms of 
corporate crime.
Thank you 
Find out more about the work of the 
OECD to combat foreign bribery 
www.oecd.org/corruption

OECD Foreign Bribery Report - Key Findings

  • 2.
    Context + Methodology  Goal to illustrate the crime of foreign bribery based on the facts.  Analysis of concluded foreign bribery enforcement actions between entry into force of Convention and 1 June 2014.  Analysis limited to sanctions for foreign bribery and related preparatory or participatory offences against 427 individual and corporate defendants.  Original judgments/settlements available in 58% of cases; WGB evaluations a source of information in 40% of cases; media or third party reporting relied upon for 2% of cases.  Data equally useful to governments and business.
  • 3.
    How are casesdetected?
  • 4.
    Who pays thebribes? Only 4% of sanctioned companies were SMEs. In 60% of cases, the company associated with the corrupt transaction had more than 250 employees.
  • 5.
    Which sectors aremost at risk? Two-thirds of the foreign bribery cases occurred in four sectors:  Extractive  Construction  Transportation and storage  Information and communication
  • 6.
    Which sectors aremost at risk? Bribes as a percentage of the transaction value per sector
  • 7.
    Who is onthe receiving end? SOE officials were bribed in 27% of cases but received 80.11% of total bribes. Heads of state and ministers were bribed in a total of 5% of cases but received 11% of total bribes.
  • 8.
    Where were thebribes paid? Two-thirds of bribes were paid to officials in countries higher on the UN Human Development Index This map shows the countries whose public officials received bribes
  • 9.
    How and whyare bribes paid?
  • 10.
    What is thecost of foreign bribery? On average, bribes equaled 10.9% of the transaction value and 34.5% of the profits. In 41% of cases, sanctions ranged from 100-200% of the proceeds of the corrupt transaction. “Every dollar spent on a bribe is a dollar not spent on innovation” Brackett Denniston, GE (Launch of OECD Foreign Bribery Report, 2 December 2014)
  • 11.
    How are casessanctioned?
  • 12.
    Enforcement of foreignbribery laws 80 individuals were imprisoned after a foreign bribery conviction
  • 13.
    Enforcement of foreignbribery laws 390 investigations are underway in 24 of the 41 parties to the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention
  • 14.
    Conclusions + NextSteps  Proposals for both governments and business to enhance the fight against foreign bribery, building on findings of the report.  Scope for further, in-depth analysis and additional horizontal studies to build on this first attempt to measure foreign bribery.  Potential for using this model to analyse other forms of corporate crime.
  • 15.
    Thank you Findout more about the work of the OECD to combat foreign bribery www.oecd.org/corruption