The document outlines an outcome-based curriculum development model that emphasizes defining clear intended learning outcomes, aligning curriculum and assessment to those outcomes, and using data to enhance student learning. It highlights the importance of developing key competencies and skills necessary for students to succeed in their future roles, alongside the need for continuous improvement in educational practices. The author discusses challenges in adapting teaching and assessment methods to foster deeper understanding and the transformation of traditional learning outcomes.
Introduction to outcome based curriculum development by Dr. Peeyush Verma.
Focus on defining desired student capabilities for effective learning.
Four key areas of adopting outcome-based approaches: defining learning outcomes, curriculum alignment, outcomes assessment, and continuous improvement.
Outlines fundamental premises such as diverse learning paces, the success cycle, and teacher influence.
Discusses differences between outcome-based and traditional approaches, emphasizing graduate qualities and expected performance.
Descriptions of key competencies for health studies graduates, including analytical and evaluative abilities.
Knowledge scope expected from health studies graduates, emphasising multidisciplinary nature and contemporary issues.
Discusses integrating scientific understanding within the learning framework, focusing on generic competencies.
Challenges student understanding through visual representations of the water cycle and associated concepts.
Insights on critical thinking and the importance of language in understanding disciplinary knowledge.
Emphasizes the importance of deep expertise and the challenge of identifying knowledge gaps in students.
Defines essential qualities and capabilities that should be fostered in graduates across educational programmes.
Importance of action verbs in outlining student capabilities and expected outcomes beyond basic comprehension.
A list of significant verbs used to articulate student learning outcomes effectively.
Encourages students to formulate connecting questions to enhance understanding across disciplines.
Identifies challenges in aligning education systems with modern knowledge and assessment requirements.
Explores capabilities assessment and its potential transformative effect on student learning.
Questions the best methods to assess transformative outcomes linked to key competencies.
Poses questions on the evidence required to measure student capabilities accurately.
Explains how to characterize educational progress, emphasizing connections and application of knowledge.
Raises questions about evolving literacy assessments needed for 21st-century learners.
Discusses evidence requirements for assessing learning progress in various curriculum areas.
Explores the types of inquiry skills and deeper understanding that can be assessed.
Encourages reflection on the learning process and importance of addressing critical assessment questions.
Defines the learning outcomes and attitudes necessary for students to achieve their potential.
Lists key references used throughout the presentation for further reading and exploration.
A new modelof curriculum
implementation
What do we want our students to be?
Teaching through knowledge FOR
capabilities (i.e. key competencies)
Knowledge and its organisation
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
3.
ADOPTING OUTCOME BASEDAPPROACH
Adopting outcome-based approaches to student learning involves
four important areas of work for the purpose of enhancing quality
of student learning in our programmes:
•as the starting point define clearly what students should be able
to do on completing their course of study (intended learning
outcomes)
•design the curriculum, teaching, learning and assessment to
enable students to achieve the intended learning outcomes
(alignment)
•collect data on students’ achievement of learning outcomes
(outcomes assessment)
•use outcome assessment data to inform further development
and enhancement of the programme/subject continuous
improvement
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
4.
THREE BASIC PREMISEOF OBE
All students can learn and
succeed, but not all in the same time
or in the same way. We need to
nurture and develop ”learning to learn
skills” in them.
Successful learning promotes even
more successful learning.
“Schools” (and teachers) control the
conditions that determine whether or
not students are successful at school
learning.
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
5.
INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Distinguish some important differences between
the outcome-based approach and common
'traditional' approaches.
The Distinction between Learning Outcomes and
Syllabus/Content.
To elaborate, what are the desirable qualities of
the graduates from your programme(s) and
subject(s)?
What knowledge and skills you want and expect
your students to demonstrate?
What level of performance should they
demonstrate to be able to excel in their
prospective role of entry-level professionals?
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
6.
BENCHMARK STATEMENT OFHEALTH STUDIES
• the ability to make comparisons between a range of health
contexts, such as individual and institutional and national and
international contexts;
• the ability to analyse health and health issues, and health
information and data that may be drawn from a wide range of
disciplines;
• the ability to synthesise coherent arguments from a range of
contesting theories relating to health and health issues;
• the ability to draw upon the personal and lived experience of
health and illness through the skill of reflection and to make
links between individual experience of health and health
issues and the wider structural elements relevant to health;
• the ability to articulate central theoretical arguments within a
variety of health studies contexts;
• the ability to draw on research and research methodologies
to locate, review and evaluate
(Source: Health Studies, QAA, 2004) NITTTR, BHOPAL
PEEYUSH VERMA,
7.
BENCHMARK STATEMENT OFHEALTH STUDIES
The Health Studies graduates will demonstrate
knowledge and understanding of:
1. health as a contested concept;
2. the multidisciplinary nature of health studies;
3. the central place of research activity in the
development of the subject;
4. the diverse determinants of health;
5. the contemporary issues at the forefront of the
subject;
6. the range of realist and constructionist theories of
causality relating to health;
(Source: Health Studies, QAA, 2004)
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
8.
We could readthe science learning area like this
New ‘nature of science’ integrating strand
(based on generic Key Competencies)
Understanding about science
Communicating in science
Investigating in science
Participating and contributing
Content included through integration
Living
World
Material
World
Physical
World
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
Planet
Earth and
Beyond
Representing ideas …
•What is different about
this way of showing the
water cycle?
• What do the pictures on
the “game” represent?
• What do the pathways
represent? Why are
they different colours?
• What do the arrows
represent?
• What is not represented
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
here?
11.
The disciplinary potentialin NZ based Model
• Provides the language, including
„meta‟ language, to help students
think;
• awareness that texts are structured
differently for different purposes;
• multiple representations of ideas;
• unpacking conventions and thinking
about how different disciplines work;
• valuing systems level thinking and
complexity;
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
12.
Teaching for ‘deeperunderstanding’
• Experts know their area deeply – the
theories, the unanswered
questions, the research
methods, the practical challenges of
deploying these, the work of their
peers, the reputable journals, the
professional rivalries and so on…
• They may not know other related
areas as deeply – but they will know
the right questions to ask – that
is, they’ll draw on their expertise to
identify what it might be that they
don’t know (and now need to find
out), assuming they are disposed to
do this…
Source: www.mfe.govt.nz
Students from Papakura South School
Can students become experts so they too can experience these powerful
capabilities? What are the implications for teaching?
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
13.
USING BROAD OUTCOMESTATEMENT
Outcomes refer to the desirable qualities of our graduates:
1. learning contributes to the development of some essential
qualities, such as problem
solving, communication, decision making.;
2. it is important to get the key areas of learning and
developmental outcomes right so as to develop ”learning
to learn skill”;
EXAMPLE
The learning about the various domains in an MBA
programme is expected to lead to the development of the
abilities to identify and diagnose problems:
Identify/Diagnose problems) Ability to identify and diagnose
business problems accurately and effectively across a wide
range of business domains, including management
practices, accounting and financial
management, operations, marketing, and strategic
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
management.“
14.
USING APPROPRIATE ACTIONVERBS
Outcomes imply what the student should be able to
know and do and therefore outcome statements
should be about how such achievement can be
demonstrated - by action verbs:
Such that:
• It goes beyond simple knowledge or
comprehension such as
interpret, draw, reflect, apply.
• It uses novel situation or “real world” context.
• involves multiple concepts.
• It requires recognition of concepts involved
(analysis), their roles here (application), and how
several ideas come together (synthesis).
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
15.
Some key verbs
Analyse,Apply, Articulate, Compare, Contra
st, Criticise, Describe, Differentiate, Discuss
, Distinguish, Elaborate, Evaluate, Identify, I
ntegrate, Interpret, Justify, Label, List, Matc
h, Outline, Summarise, Synthesise, Theoris
e, Create, Decide, Design, Organise, Plan,
Predict, Prepare, Present, Prioritise, Produc
e.
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
16.
Connecting questions studentscould ask
• Relating more general conceptual ideas to
specific contexts
• Making coherent links between topics and
ideas within a discipline area
• Developing multi-disciplinary links across
learning areas
• Building bridges between powerful
conceptual learning and everyday life
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
17.
Challenges for alignmentin any education system!
Knowledge era: new views of
knowledge, ICTs, globalization, diversity, rapid
change, etc.
Curriculum review (lifelong
learning, key
competencies, content
reduction)
New types of assessment
(e.g. assessment for
learning)
By implication...
Deep changes in teaching and learning - both in practice and
in [tacit] beliefs about their nature
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
18.
What about assessmentof “progress”?
What do these outcomes look like?
Capabilities
Teaching through knowledge FOR
capabilities (i.e. key competencies)
Knowledge and its organisation
Disciplinary knowledge is the basis through
which we teach for capabilities (as outcomes
in their own right) BHOPAL
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR,
19.
Should we assessKey Competencies?
• If key competencies can transform
learning outcomes, then asking how
we might assess them per se seems
to be the wrong question.
• Is this a better exploratory question:
What can changed outcomes look
like when key competencies are
used to transform disciplinary
learning?
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
20.
More questions thananswers
•
•
•
Can competency be reported from
single tasks or should evidence be
accumulated across a range of tasks
and learning contexts? (Sufficiency of
evidence)
What role (if any) should
extracurricular activities play in making
judgments about a student‟s
capabilities?
What does making progress in
developing capabilities look like?
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
21.
How might progressbe described?
More certain outcomes
Standardised tests
measure traditional
academic outcomes
Making rich connections
across ideas and contexts
Zooming in
Zooming out
Using new skills and
knowledge in unfamiliar
and more demanding
contexts
Key competencies transform
learning outcomes
After Carr, 2008
Outcomes more uncertain
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
22.
New assessment questions
•We already know how to assess basic literacy and numeracy
well. Why would we change?
• If they are “necessary but not sufficient” to meet the multiliteracies demands of the 21st century, what other aspects of
these learning foundations should we be looking to grow?
• How will we know if our teaching has been successful?
NZCER currently has a research project directly
exploring this question – “Lifelong Literacy”, funded by
the Cognition Trust. ARBs research is contributing too.
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
23.
What could countas evidence?
More certain outcomes
Standardised tests
measure traditional
academic outcomes
Perhaps some inquiry outcomes
would sit here?
What else?
Zooming in
Zooming out
How much do we know about
“making progress” in all the
curriculum learning areas?
Do we even know what we are
looking for?
How could we look for and
document growth that transforms
our children’s “being”?
After Carr, 2008
Outcomes more uncertain
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
24.
Purposes for inquiry:what might evidence of
learning look like in each case?
• Developing inquiry skills
• Learning to learn/fostering lifelong learning
dispositions
• Developing deeper understanding of a
topic/ issue/ context/ concept/ system or
etc
• Learning about research as a process of
knowledge building (the constructed and
contested nature of knowledge)
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
25.
• We‟re allon a learning journey. It‟s
important to take it slowly and think
carefully about the way ahead.
• But this is not an excuse for
inaction…
• The assessment questions I‟ve posed
here seem to be “on the edge of our
knowing” – but have we even got the
right questions?
• We can only answer questions like
these if we work together
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
26.
THE OUTCOME BASEDCURRICULUM FOCUS
“The learning outcomes comprise the
knowledge, understanding, skills and
attitudes that students should acquire to
enable them to reach their full potential
and lead successful and fulfilling lives
as individuals, as of the community and
at work”.
HOW TO DEVELOP LEARNING TO
LEARN ATTITUDE AMONG
STUDENTS?
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL
27.
References
• Carr, M.(2008, 13 March ). Zooming in and Zooming Out: Challenges and
choices in discussions about making progress. Paper presented at the
NZCER Conference: Making Progress - Measuring
Progress, Wellington, March 2008.
• Gilbert, J. (2005). Catching the Knowledge Wave? The Knowledge Society
and the future of education. Wellington: NZCER Press.
• Hipkins, R. (2007). Assessing key competencies: why would we? How
could we? Wellington: Ministry of Education.
• Reid (2007) Key competencies: a new way forward or more of the same?
Curriculum Matters, 2, 43-62. (Journal available on subscription from
NZCER)
PEEYUSH VERMA, NITTTR, BHOPAL