An Inclusive and Families Strengths Based
Approach in Child Protection
Anne Beattie Shaun Thomas
East Lothian Council and Children1st
Why take the journey to a more inclusive
practice
• 21st Century Review of Social Work
• CHRISTIE REPORT
• MUNRO REPORT
• GIRFEC – now enshrined in legislation
• Inspection 2010/2011 – doing well – can do
better!
• Research
partnership
with families
collaboration
between agencies
professional
knowledge
family
knowledge
harm
and danger
strengths
and safety
solution focused approach to build safety for children -
Signs of Safety…
What's going well? - What we are worried about ? - What needs to happen?
2011 – multi agency workshops to introduce
Signs of Safety
2012 – set up multi-agency operational , overview and reference
group supported by WithScotland
2013 – introduce Signs of Safety model for Initial/Pre-birth
Case Conferences
2014 – Introduce Signs of Safety Model for all Case
Conferences , supervision, core groups
2014 – Year 2 of 5 year implementation
2015 – SMART Plans training – the journey continues
2014 - 2015 – research project with IRISS - SMART Plans
The 3 Ps
• PREPARATION
• PARTICIPATION
• PLANS
Visit family and
compile family
tree/eco map to
identify key family
members /support
network
Visit family to discuss
identified harm and
danger and make sure
they understand the
process
Support family to
prepare for meeting
– what’s going well,
what are we
worried about,
what needs to
happen
Visit child –
get their
views – 3
houses,
fairy, wizard
Family can’t
attend? – get
written views
for meeting
Preparation is Key
Child: Date:
They explained
that’s how you see it
and this is how we
see it
The Family
The
Professionals
Each risk
discussed fully,
Discussed in
good detail
Key Messages
• Professionals and Families feel the meetings are inclusive
• The visual aspect of the meeting is helpful
• Families appreciate their strengths being recognised – do
not feel judged
• Professionals and families believe all harm/risks are
addressed fairly and fully
• Professionals report that Plans are robust, but not always
complete
• Families feel the Plans are likely to help
PLANNING IN CHILD PROTECTION
We need to make plans more :
Specific
Measurable
Achievable
Realistic
Time based
This led to a joint research project:-

An Inclusive and Families Strengths Based Approach in Child Protection

  • 1.
    An Inclusive andFamilies Strengths Based Approach in Child Protection Anne Beattie Shaun Thomas East Lothian Council and Children1st
  • 2.
    Why take thejourney to a more inclusive practice • 21st Century Review of Social Work • CHRISTIE REPORT • MUNRO REPORT • GIRFEC – now enshrined in legislation • Inspection 2010/2011 – doing well – can do better! • Research
  • 3.
    partnership with families collaboration between agencies professional knowledge family knowledge harm anddanger strengths and safety solution focused approach to build safety for children - Signs of Safety… What's going well? - What we are worried about ? - What needs to happen?
  • 4.
    2011 – multiagency workshops to introduce Signs of Safety 2012 – set up multi-agency operational , overview and reference group supported by WithScotland 2013 – introduce Signs of Safety model for Initial/Pre-birth Case Conferences 2014 – Introduce Signs of Safety Model for all Case Conferences , supervision, core groups 2014 – Year 2 of 5 year implementation 2015 – SMART Plans training – the journey continues 2014 - 2015 – research project with IRISS - SMART Plans
  • 5.
    The 3 Ps •PREPARATION • PARTICIPATION • PLANS
  • 6.
    Visit family and compilefamily tree/eco map to identify key family members /support network Visit family to discuss identified harm and danger and make sure they understand the process Support family to prepare for meeting – what’s going well, what are we worried about, what needs to happen Visit child – get their views – 3 houses, fairy, wizard Family can’t attend? – get written views for meeting Preparation is Key
  • 7.
  • 8.
    They explained that’s howyou see it and this is how we see it The Family
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Key Messages • Professionalsand Families feel the meetings are inclusive • The visual aspect of the meeting is helpful • Families appreciate their strengths being recognised – do not feel judged • Professionals and families believe all harm/risks are addressed fairly and fully • Professionals report that Plans are robust, but not always complete • Families feel the Plans are likely to help
  • 11.
    PLANNING IN CHILDPROTECTION We need to make plans more : Specific Measurable Achievable Realistic Time based This led to a joint research project:-

Editor's Notes

  • #11 The key messages from the evaluation are shown on slide. Although this evaluation only related to the first 25 case conferences in East Lothian, the messages are very similar to other research carried out in England and abroad. The most significant for me are that families appreciate their strengths being recognised, they do not feel judged . Professionals and family members believed that all harm and risks are discussed fully and fairly and that the plans are robust.