Paper id 36201506

International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.6, June 2015
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
24
Data Mining in Clinical Records to foretell the risk of
Osteoporosis
Ms.K.S.Sathawane1
, Prof.Ms.R.R.Tuteja2
Computer Science and Engineering Department1, 2
,P.R.M.I.T.R. Badnera
Email: khushboo.sathawane@gmail.com1
, ranu.tuteja@gmail.com2
Abstract- In the healthcare sector quality demands are rising for designing expert systems for medical
diagnosis. At the same time growing capture of biological, clinical, administrative data and integration of
distributed and heterogeneous databases create a completely new base for medical quality and cost management.
Clinical decisions are often made based on doctors’ intuition and experience rather than on the knowledge rich
data hidden in the database. This practice leads to unwanted biases, errors and excessive medical costs which
affects the quality of service provided to patients. Data mining, have the potential to generate a knowledge-rich
environment which can help to significantly improve the quality of clinical decisions.
Towards this background we applied intelligent data mining methods for analyzing medical
repositories. This paper thus assess the role of the data mining techniques namely apriori algorithm, improved
apriori algorithm and Fuzzy Logic rule based classifier in the diagnosis of risk of Osteoporosis in patients. It is
based on the statistics already collected about the presence of Osteoporosis from patients data set. Fuzzy logic
rule based classifiers can be used an effective tool for accurately diagnosing the severity of Osteoporosis. This
paper presents the research in developing data mining techniques for predicting the risk of disease like
osteoporosis prevalence. Osteoporosis is a bone disease that commonly occurs among postmenopausal women.
Early detection and diagnosis is the key for prevention but are very difficult, without using costly diagnosing
devices, due to complex factors involved and its gradual bone lose process with no obvious waning symptoms in
particular. Our research aims to develop an intelligent decision support system based on data mining technology
to assist General Practitioners in assessing patient’s risk of developing osteoporosis. The prediction is based on
historical data of the patients. The prediction will identify at-risk patients early and helps in starting the
medication before doing the confirmatory test for Osteoporosis.
Index Terms- Datamining, Osteoporosis, Association Rules, Improved Apriori Algorithm, Fuzzy logic
1. INTRODUCTION
Knowledge discovery is the nontrivial
extraction of implicit, previously unknown, and
potentially useful information from data .In order to
get this information, we try to find patterns in the
given data set. Patterns that are interesting and certain
enough according to the user's measures are called
knowledge. The output of a program that discovers
such useful patterns is called discovered knowledge.
Data mining (DM) is a sub process of Knowledge
Discovery in Databases in which the different
available data sources are analyzed using various data
mining algorithms. Data mining is a logical process
that is used to search the relevant data from the large
amounts of information or data. The goal of this
technique is to find patterns that were previously
unknown .Association rules mining is one of the most
important tasks used in DM, which can be applied in
different domains. Association rule discovery has
been widely studied throughout the state-of-the-art
techniques .Many data mining researchers had
improved upon the quality of association rule for
business development by incorporating influential
factors like utility, number of items sold and for the
mining of association data patterns We believe that
the field of mining frequent patterns and association
rules mining is still a research area has raised interest
among researchers because the researchers are
working to provide effective and efficient methods.
SINCE the advent of advanced computing,
doctors have always made use of technology to help
them in various possible ways, from surgical imagery to
X-ray photography. Unfortunately, technology has always
stayed behind when it came to diagnosis and prediction of a
risk, a process that still requires a doctor’s knowledge and
experience to process the sheer number of variables
involved, ranging from medical history to climatic
conditions, blood pressure, environment, and various other
factors. The number of variables counts up to the total
variables that are required to understand the complete
working of nature itself, which no model has successfully
analyzed yet. To overcome this problem, medical decision
support systems such as [3] are becoming more and more
essential, which will assist the doctors in taking correct
decisions. A major challenge facing healthcare
organizations (hospitals, medical centers) is the provision of
quality services at affordable costs. Quality service implies

E-ISSN: 2321-9637
25
diagnosing patients correctly and administering treatments
that are effective. Poor clinical decisions can lead to
disastrous consequences which are therefore unacceptable.
Hospitals must also minimize the cost of clinical tests. They
can achieve these results by employing appropriate
computer-based information and/or decision support
systems.
Various algorithms and techniques like Classification,
Clustering, Regression, Artificial Intelligence, Neural
Networks, Association Rules, Decision Trees, Genetic
Algorithm, Nearest Neighbor method etc., are used for
knowledge discovery from databases
In this paper we have proposed an expert system
based on clinical data mining which will make use of
Association Rule Mining and Improved Apriori Algorithm
ans fuzzy logic to find out certain association rules which
will be useful in decision making for doctors to predict risk
of a specific disease such as Osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is a
bone disease that commonly occurs among postmenopausal
women. Early detection and diagnosis is the key for
prevention but are very difficult, without using costly
diagnosing devices There are many significant risk factors
that cause the osteoporosis in all over the world.
Considering these factors, our system will derive
association rules which will lead to statistical Analysis, and
this knowledge is further used for decision making for
whether or not the person is having Osteoporosis
prevalence.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Shaikh Abdul Hannan et.al describes aiming to
develop a expert system for diagnosing of heart disease
using support vector machine and feed-forward back-
propagation technique. Now a day’s neural network are
being used successfully in an increasing number of
application areas. This work includes the detailed
information about patient and reprocessing was done. The
Support Vector Machine (SVM) and feed-forward Back-
propagation technique have been applied over the data for
the expert system.[5].
In the paper of Agrawal and Srikanth, the Apriori
Algorithm [17] is used for Association Rule Mining to find
out frequent dataset that satisfy the predefined minimum
support and confidence from a given database. As
computers are handy now-a-days, a viable CSCP system can
be setup to collect large volumes of data and to stored in the
database simultaneously. This kind of data includes the
transaction records of clinics, hospitals, supermarkets,
banks, stock markets, telephone companies and so on.
Wenjia Wang and Sarah Rea in there paper
presents the research in developing an ensemble of data
mining techniques for predicting the risk of osteoporosis
prevalence in women. The paper focuses on investigating
the methodologies for constructing effective ensembles,
specifically on the measurements of diversity between
individual models induced by two types of machine learning
techniques, i.e. neural networks and decision tress for
predicting the risk of osteoporosis. The constructed
ensembles as well as their member predictors are assessed
in terms of reliability, diversity and accuracy of
prediction.[8]
The national Organisation of Osteoporosis
Canada Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and
Management of Osteoporosis of Canada makes evidence
based recommendations to decrease the risk of fractures in
the Canadian population. According to their research
Patients with fragility fractures are at the highest risk of
developing new fractures. Interventions can reduce that risk.
They surveyed that Osteoporotic or fragility fractures are
extremely common , more common than heart attack, stroke
and breast cancer combined, the following statistics (see
Figure1) shows this. At least one in three women and one in
five men will suffer from an osteoporotic fracture during
their lifetime.[13]
Figure 1: Statistic of Osteoporosis Fracture compared
with others
3. SYSTEM ARCIETECTURE
Our proposed system architecture consist of the
following parts:
3.1. Association Rule Mining
An Association Rule is a rule, which implies
certain association relationships among a set of objects in a
database. In this process people discover a set of association
rules at multiple levels of abstraction from the relevant
set(s) of data in a database. For example, one may discover
a set of symptoms often occurring together with certain
kinds of diseases and further study the reasons behind them.
Since finding interesting association rules in databases may
disclose some useful patterns for decision support, selective
marketing, financial forecast, medical diagnosis, and many
other applications, it has attracted a lot of attention in recent
data mining research.
Mining association rules may require iterative
scanning of large transactions or
relational databases, which is quite costly in terms of
processing. Therefore, there is a need to study efficient
mining of association rules in long transaction and /or
relational databases. Or in other word, it is necessary to
evaluate efficiency of association rule mining among
different algorithms [17]
3.2. Apriori Algorithm
One of the first algorithms to evolve for frequent
itemset and Association rule mining was Apriori. Two
major steps of the Apriori algorithm are the join and prune
steps. The join step is used to construct new candidate sets.
A candidate itemset is basically an itemset that could either

E-ISSN: 2321-9637
26
be frequent or infrequent with respect to the support
threshold. Higher level candidate itemsets (Ci) are generated
by joining previous level frequent itemsets are Li-1 with
itself. The prune step helps in filtering out candidate item-
sets whose subsets (prior level) are not frequent. This is
based on the anti-monotonic property as a result of which
every subset of a frequent item set is also frequent.Thus a
candidate item set which is composed of one or more
infrequent item sets of a prior level is filtered(pruned) from
the process of frequent itemset and association mining.
Agarwal and colleagues divided the problem of finding
good rules into two phases:
1. Find all itemsets with a specified minimal support
(coverage). An itemset is just a specific set of
items, e.g. {apples, cheese}. The Apriori
algorithm can efficiently find all itemsets whose
coverage is above a given minimum.
2. Use these itemsets to help generate interersting
rules. Having done stage 1, we have considerably
narrowed down the possibilities, and can do
reasonably fast processing of the large itemsets to
generate candidate rules.
3.2.1 Terminologies:
Support: an itemset has support s% if s% of the records in
the DB contain that itemset.
minimum support: the Apriori algorithm starts with the
specification of a minimum level of support, and will focus
on itemsets with this level or above
large itemset: doesn’t mean an itemset with many items. It
means one whose support is at least minimum support.
Lk : the set of all large k-itemsets in the DB.
Ck : a set of candidate large k-itemsets. In the algorithm we
will look at, it generates this set, which contains all the k-
itemsets that might be large, and then eventually generates
the set above.
3.1.1. Pseudo-Code:
Join Step: Ck is generated by joining Lk-1with itself
Prune Step: Any (k-1)-itemset that is not frequent cannot be
a subset of a frequent k-itemset
Figure 2: Pseudo Code for Apriori Algorithm
3.2.3 Example: Consider a database, D , consisting of 9
transactions(see Figure 3). Suppose min. support count
required is 2 (i.e. min_sup = 2/9 = 22 % ) Let minimum
confidence required is 70%. We have to first find out the
frequent itemset using Apriori algorithm.
Then, Association rules will be generated using min.
support & min. confidence.
Step 1: Generating 1-itemset Frequent Pattern: The set of
frequent 1-itemsets, L1, consists of the candidate 1-itemsets
satisfying minimum support.In the first iteration of the
algorithm, each item is a member of the set of candidate.
Step 2: Generating 2-itemset Frequent Pattern: To discover
the set of frequent 2-itemsets, L2, the algorithm uses L1
Join L1to generate a candidate set of 2-itemsets, C2.
Step 3: Generating 3-itemset Frequent Pattern: The
generation of the set of candidate 3-itemsets, C3, involves
use of the Apriori Property.In order to find C3, we compute
L2JoinL2.C3= L2 JoinL2 = {{I1, I2, I3}, {I1, I2, I5}, {I1,
I3, I5}, {I2, I3, I4}, {I2, I3, I5}, {I2, I4, I5}}.Now, Join step
is complete and Prune step will be used to reduce the size of
C3.
Step 4: Generating 4-itemset Frequent Pattern: The
algorithm uses L3 JoinL3to generate a candidate set of 4-
itemsets, C4. Although the join results in {{I1, I2, I3, I5}},
this itemset is pruned since its subset {{I2, I3, I5}}is not
frequent.
Thus, C4= φ, and algorithm terminates, having found all of
the frequent items.
The following Figure (see figure 4.)shows this.
Figure 3: Sample Transaction Database
Step 5:Generating Association Rules from Frequent
Itemsets
Procedure:
•For each frequent itemset “l”,generate all nonempty
subsets of l.
•For every nonempty subset sof l, output the rule “s (l-s)”if
support_count(l)/support_count(s)>=min_conf
where min_conf is minimum confidence threshold.
•Back To Example:
We had L = {{I1}, {I2}, {I3}, {I4}, {I5}, {I1,I2},
{I1,I3}, {I1,I5}, {I2,I3}, {I2,I4}, {I2,I5},
{I1,I2,I3}, {I1,I2,I5}}
–Lets take l = {I1,I2,I5}.
–Its all nonempty subsets are {I1,I2}, {I1,I5}, {I2,I5}, {I1},
{I2}, {I5}.
Let minimum confidence thresholdis , say 70%.
The resulting association rules are shown below, each listed
with its confidence.
–R1: I1 ^ I2 I5
•Confidence = sc{I1,I2,I5}/sc{I1,I2} = 2/4 = 50%
•R1 is Rejected.
–R2: I1 ^ I5 I2
•R2 is Selected.
–R3: I2 ^ I5 I1
•R3 is Selected.
Step 5:Generating Association Rules from
Frequent Itemsets
–R4: I1 I2 ^ I5
•Confidence = sc{I1,I2,I5}/sc{I1} = 2/6 = 33%

E-ISSN: 2321-9637
27
•R4 is Rejected.
–R5: I2 I1 ^ I5
•Confidence = sc{I1,I2,I5}/{I2} = 2/7 = 29%
•R5 is Rejected.
–R6: I5 I1 ^ I2
•Confidence = sc{I1,I2,I5}/ {I5} = 2/2 = 100%
•R6 is Selected.
In this way, We have found three strong association rules.
3.3 The Improved Apriori Algorithm
In our proposed approach, we enhance the Apriori algorithm
to reduce the time consuming for candidates itemset
generation. We firstly scan all transactions to generate L1
which contains the items, their support count and
Transaction ID where the items are found. And then we use
L1 later as a helper to generate L2, L3 ... Lk. When we want
to generate C2, we make a self-join L1 * L1 to construct 2-
itemset C (x, y), where x and y are the items of C2.
Figure 4: Steps for implementing A priori Algorithm
Before scanning all transaction records to count the support
count of each candidate, use L1 to get the transaction IDs of
the minimum support count between x and y, and thus scan
for C2 only in these specific transactions. The same thing
for C3, construct 3-itemset C (x, y, z), where x, y and z are
the items of C3 and use L1 to get the transaction IDs of the
minimum support count between x, y and z, then scan for
C3 only in these specific transactions and repeat these steps
until no new frequent itemsets are identified.(see Figure 5)
3.3.1 Pseudo Code :
Figure 5: Pseudo Code for Improved Apriori Algorithm
3.3.2 Example:
Step 1: Suppose we have transaction set D has 9
transactions, and the minimum support = 3.
Step 2: firstly, scan all transactions to get frequent 1-itemset
l1 which contains the items and their support count and the
transactions ids that contain these items, and then eliminate
the candidates that are infrequent or their support are less
than the min_sup.
Step3: The next step is to generate candidate 2-itemset from
L1. To get support count for every itemset, split each
itemset in 2-itemset into two elements then use l1 table to
determine the transactions where you can find the itemset
in, rather than searching for them in all transactions. for
example, let’s take the first item (I1, I2), in the original
Apriori we scan all 9 transactions to find the item (I1, I2);
but in our proposed improved algorithm we will split the
item (I1, I2) into I1 and I2 and get the minimum support
between them using L1, here i1 has the smallest minimum
support. After that we search for itemset (I1, I2) only in the
transactions T1, T4, T5, T7, T8 and T9.
Step 4: The same thing to generate 3-itemset depending on
L1 table.(see Figure 6)
Figure 6: Steps for Improved Apriori Implementation

E-ISSN: 2321-9637
28
3.4 Comparing Algorithms
In the previous example, if we count the number
of scanned transactions to get (1, 2, 3)-itemset using the
original Apriori and our improved Apriori, we will observe
the obvious difference between number of scanned
transactions with our improved Apriori and the original
Apriori. From the table 1, number of transactions in1-
itemset is the same in both of sides, and whenever the k of
k-itemset increase, the gap between our improved Apriori
and the original Apriori increase from view of time
consumed, and hence this will reduce the time consumed to
generate candidate support count.
Table 1: Comparison of Number of transaction scanned
Origional Apriori Improved Apriori
1-itemset 45 45
2-itemset 54 25
3-itemset 36 14
sum 135 84
3.4 Data mining in Clinical Records
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines
the criteria, shown in table-2 and established the definition
of osteoporosis based on BMD as “faulty and weakened
bone structure due to low amount of bone minerals per unit
volume”4, The proposed system does not need of BMD, as
calculating BMD from DEXA is an expensive scan and
common people cannot afford this scan.
There are many significant risk factors for osteoporosis; the
table-3 shows some of the factors that cause the
osteoporosis in all over the world The multilayer perceptron
network is the most often used in the medical diagnosis
systems. We also proposed same network for predicting the
future fracture risk. The attributes taken for diagnoses are;
Age (months), Sex (male/female), Height (inch), weight
(kg), Years since menopause (months), Heredity (Y/N),
Cigarettes (per day), Alcohol (unit/day), eight bearing
exercise (Y/N), Calcium in diet (mg/day), Low back pain
(Y/N), Fracture (Y/N), Height loss (cm), Inactivity (Y/N),
and Glucocorticoid (Y/N). These factors have significant
impact on bone mass and trabecular microarchitecture. So,
the listed attributes efficiently diagnose the fracture risk.
3.4.1 Clinical records are collected and stored in the large
Database in SQL/Access
3.4.2 Pre-processing in performed and necessary data
related to Osteoporosis is Extracted with the help of ETL
process
3.4.3 With the help of Data mining software such as R-Tool,
data mining algorithm such as improved apriori algorithm is
implemented.
3.4.4.This algorithm generates association rules which can
be used to develop patterns and gives statistical output,
which is used for decision making.
3.4.5 In our paper, data of particular person is input to a
form, from where our system will perform a decision
making of whether or not Osteoporosis Prevalence is there
in that patient.(see Figure 7).
Table 2: Reference values defined by WHO
Table 3: Risk factors for Osteoporosis
Fig 7: System Architecture for Data mining in Clinical
Records
3.4.1 A Quantitative Approach:
Problem of classical association rules is that not
every kind of data can be used for mining. Rules can only
be derived from data containing binary data, where an item
either exists in a transaction or it does not exist. When
dealing with a quantitative database, no association rules
can be discovered. This fact led to the invention of
quantitative association rules, where the quantitative
attributes are split into intervals and the single elements are
either members or nonmembers of those intervals. With this
approach, a binary database can be constructed out of a
quantitative one.

E-ISSN: 2321-9637
29
The quantitative approach allows an item either to
be member of an interval or not. This leads to an under- or
overestimation of values that are close to the borders of such
“crisp” sets. To overcome this problem, the approach of
fuzzy association rules has been developed. It allows the
intervals to overlap, making the set fuzzy instead of crisp.
Items can then show a partial membership to more than one
set, overcoming the above addressed, so-called “sharp
boundary problem”. The membership of an item is defined
by a membership function and fuzzy set theoretic operations
are incorporated to calculate the quality measures of
discovered rules. Using this approach, rules can be
discovered that might have got lost with the standard
quantitative approach[see figure 8].
3.5 Classifiers
Classification is a technique that predicts
categorical class labels. It classifies data (constructs a
model) based on the training set and the values (class
labels) in a classifying attribute and uses it in classifying
new data. Classification is a two – step process consisting
of Model Construction and Model Usage. Model
Construction is defined as a process of describing a set of
predetermined classes whereas Model Usage is helpful for
classifying future or unknown objects. Formerly, three
Classifiers Decision Tree, Classification via Clustering and
Naive Bayes can be used to diagnose the presence of
particular disease in patients[21] .
Fuzzy logic is used to convert quantitative values of
attributes to categorical ones so as to eliminate any loss of
information arising due to sharp partitioning(using ranges)
and then generate fuzzy association rules.
“Fuzzy logic may be viewed as an extension of multivalued
logic. Its uses and objectives, however, are quite different.
Thus, the fact that fuzzy logic deals with approximate rather
than precise modes of reasoning implies that, in general, the
chains of reasoning in fuzzy logic are short in length and
rigor does not play as important a role as it does in classical
logical systems. In a nutshell, in fuzzy logic everything,
including truth, is a matter of degree.”
Fuzzy logic deduces its greater expressive power from
including probability theory and probabilistic logic.
Fig. 8: Fuzzy logic classifiers
4. OSTEOPOROSIS RISK FACTORS
The Osteoporosis Risk Factors are categorized into
following two types:
Uncontrollable Risk Factors
1. Being over age 50.
2. Being female.
3. Menopause.
4. Family history of osteoporosis.
5. Low body weight/being small and thin.
6. Broken bones or height loss.
Controllable Risk Factors
1. Not getting enough calcium and vitamin D.
2. Not eating enough fruits and vegetables.
3. Getting too much protein, sodium and caffeine.
4. Having an inactive lifestyle.
5. Smoking.
6. Drinking too much alcohol.
7. Losing weight.
According to our algorithm , the following sample database
is of around 200 patients and their Osteoporosis risk
factors, as shown in Figure 9. The No(%) shows the
minimum support count.
By applying our Algorithm and setting minimum
support , we can get various Association Rules in order to
predict the prevalence of Osteoporosis
Figure 9: Summary of descriptive characteristics
Osteoporosis risk factors of around 200 postmenopausal
Women
5.IMPLEMENTATION
Our Clinical Descision Support System looks like this:
Step 1: First step is to open the database of clinical history
of patients. Browsing through the folder where data is kept.
(See Figure 10)

E-ISSN: 2321-9637
30
Figure 10: Opening Database
Clinical history of 100s of patients is stored in .xls file, the
records contains relevant factors viz. uncontrollable
parameters such as Patient ID, Age>65,Gender,Whether
menopaused, BMI<18, History of Osteoporosis (Family),
Fragility Fracture(Personal), and Controllable factors such
as Estrogen Intake,Smoking, Alcoholic Intake > 2units/D,
Inactive Lifestyle, and whether suffering from Osteoporosis.
The Data is feed in Yes/No form.
Figure 11: Clinical database
Step 2: Preprocessing the Data: Here the textual data is
converted into numbers.
Figure 12: Preprocessed data
Step 3: Applying our improved apriori algorithm for finding
association rules, providing Minimum Support Threshold =
0.03 and Minimum Confidence Threshold = 0.01
Figure 13: Applying Improved Apriori Algorithm
Step4:Processing dataset with minimum support threshold =
0.03 Displaying Frequent Items found above Threshold
Support and the rules generated,
Figure 14: Diplaying Rules
Step 5:Performing ANFIS Training and the Output of
ANFIS Training
Figure 15: Output 1 of ANFIS Training
Figure 16: Output 2 of ANFIS Training
6. CONCLUSION
The development of Information Technology has
generated large amount of databases and huge data in
various areas. The research in databases and information
technology has given rise to an approach to store and
manipulate this precious data for further decision making.
This suggestion is promising as data modeling and
analysis tools, e.g., data mining, have the potential to
generate a knowledge-rich environment which can help to
significantly improve the quality of clinical decisions.
In this paper, an improved Apriori is proposed
through reducing the time consumed in transactions
scanning for candidate itemsets by reducing the number of
transactions to be scanned. This algorithm scans the
transaction database D only when L1-candidates is
produced, the rest scan the preceding result instead of the

E-ISSN: 2321-9637
31
transaction database, greatly reducing I/O load and increase
efficiency. The interesting association rule can be accessed
more effectively by the improved Apriori algorithm.
Existing electronic medical details obtained from hospitals
are utilized as training data set for analysis. Algorithm is
used in mining the training data set,which is turn produces
association rule and with the help of classifiers such as
fuzzy logic, it discovers implicit and potential useful
knowledge from large preprocessed databases.
In other words, the objective of this paper is to
develop a decision support system that identify persons who
are susceptible to Osteoporosis and raise an awareness
among health care providers and patients. This will be
useful in primary health centers where equipments for
measuring bone strength are not easily available.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Our thanks to the experts who have contributed towards
development of the paper.
REFERENCES
[1] K.S.Kavitha, K.V.Ramakrishnan, Manoj Kumar Singh
“Modeling and design of evolutionary neural network
for heart disease detection”IJCSI International Journal
of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 7, Issue 5,
September 2010 ISSN (Online): 1694-0814
www.IJCSI.org 272
[2] Abdul Basit Shaikh, Muhammad Sarim, Sheikh Kashif
Raffat, Kamran Ahsan, Adnan Nadeem and
Muhammad Siddiq “Artificial Neural Network: A Tool
for Diagnosing Osteoporosis” Research Journal of
Recent Sciences ISSN 2277-2502Vol. 3(2), 87-91,
February (2014) Res.J.Recent Sci. International
Science Congress Association 87 Available online at:
www.isca.in, www.isca.me
[3] R. A. Miller, “Medical diagnostic decision support
systems—Past,present, and future—A threaded
bibliography and brief commentary,”J. Amer. Med.
Inf. Assoc., vol. 1, pp. 8–27, 1994.
[4] Chen, J., Greiner, R.: Comparing Bayesian Network
Classifiers. In Proc. of UAI-99, pp.101–108,1999.
[5] Shaikh Abdul Hannan, V. D. Bhagile R. R. Manza, R.
J. Ramteke, ―Diagnosis and Medical Prescription of
Heart Disease Using Support Vector Machine and
Feed forward Back propagation techniqueǁ,
International Journal on Computer Science and
Engineering, pp 2150-2159, 2010.
[6] Mrs. S. V. Shinde, Dr. U.V. Kulkarni “Mining
Classification Rules from Database by Using Artificial
Neural Network” IIJACKD JOURNAL OF
RESEARCH | VOL 1 | ISSUE 1 | FEBRUARY 2012
[7] Ghazi Johnny “Developing A-priori Algorithm for Fast
Mining Association Rules+”
http:www.iasj.net/iasj?func=fulltext&aId=32331
[8] Wenjia Wang and Sarah Rea ” Intelligent Ensemble
System Aids Osteoporosis Early
Detection”[Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS Int. Conf.
on EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTING, Lisbon,
Portugal, June 16-18, 2005 (pp123-128)
[9] Mahmood A. Rashid1, Md Tamjidul Hoque2, Abdul
Sattar1 “”Association Rules Mining Based Clinical
Observations”paper available at cornell university
library site 1Institute for Integrated and Intelligent
Systems (IIIS), 2Discovery Biology, Eskitis Institute
for Cell & Molecular Therapies, Griffith University
Nathan, QLD, Australia
[10] Babak Taati, Jasper Snoek, Dionne Aleman, and
Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh “Data Mining in Bone Marrow
Transplant Records to Identify Patients With High
Odds of Survival” IEEE JOURNAL OF
BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS,
VOL. 18, NO. 1, JANUARY 2014
[11] Yanchang Zhao “ Book on R and Data Mining:
Examples and Case Studies
1”yanchang@rdatamining.com
http://www.RDataMining.com August 7, 2014
[12] Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes on
“APRIORI Algorithm”
http:
www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/~cse634/lecture_notes/07apri
ori.pdf
[13] National Institute of Osteoporosis Canada
“OSTEOPOROSIS Towards a Fracture-Free Future”
Osteoporosis Canada www.osteoporosis.ca]
[14] Ruijuan Hu “Medical Data Mining Based on
Association Rules”-Published by Canadian Center of
Science and Education www.ccsenet.org/cis Computer
and Information Science Vol. 3, No. 4; November
2010 108 ISSN]
[15] Mohammed Al-Maolegi , Bassam Arkok “AN
IMPROVED APRIORI ALGORITHM FOR
ASSOCIATION RULES” International Journal on
Natural Language Computing (IJNLC) Vol. 3, No.1,
February 2014
[16] Xiang Fang An Improved Apriori Algorithm on the
Frequent Itemse International Conference on Education
Technology and Information System (ICETIS 2013)
[17] Agrawal and Srikant, Fast algorithm for Mining
Association Rules, in The 20th VLDB conference
Santiago, Chile, 1994.
[18] Jiao Yabing Research of an Improved Apriori
Algorithm in Data Mining Association Rules
International Journal of Computer and Communication
Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1, January 2013
[19] Shruti Aggarwal , Ranveer Kaur Comparative Study of
Various Improved Versions of Apriori Algorithm
International Journal of Engineering Trends and
Technology (IJETT) - Volume4Issue4- April 2013
[20] Wenjia Wang and Sarah Rea, Intelligent Ensemble
System Aids Osteoporosis Early Detection Proceedings
of the 6th WSEAS Int. Conf. on EVOLUTIONARY
COMPUTING, Lisbon, Portugal, June 16-18, 2005
(pp123-128)
[21] Heydar Jafarzadeh*, Mehdi Sadeghzadeh,
ImprovedApriori Algorithm Using Fuzzy Logic
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Computer Science and Software Engineering Volume
4, Issue 6, June 2014 ISSN: 2277 128X

Paper id 36201506

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Paper id 36201506 (20)

More from IJRAT (20)

Paper id 36201506