SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
25 April 2020 Jane Lambert
i
1. Sources of Law
Like other areas of law, patent law is to be found in enactments and case law.
2. Enactments
(1) The principal statute is the Patents Act 1977. This was passed to enable the UK to implement the
European Patent Convention (“EPC”) and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”). However, it also contains
provisions that were to be found in the Patents Act 1949 and earlier legislation. Practitioners occasionally have
to refer to the Patent Law Amendment Act 1852 which established the Patent Office (now known as the
Intellectual Property Office (“IPO”) and even the Statue of Monopolies 1623 which preserved patents for
inventions as an exception to a comprehensive abolition of monopolies.
(2) The EPC established the European Patent Office (“EPO”) which grants patents known as “European
patents” on behalf of the governments of the contracting parties. The EPC is not an EU treaty and the EPO is
not an EU institution although all EU member states are party to the EPC. The UK remains a contracting party
notwithstanding Brexit. European patents are granted for groups of contracting parties designated by patent
owners. A European patent designating the UK is known as a “European patent (UK)”. European patents (UK)
are treated for all practical purposes as though they were UK patents granted by the IPO. However, the
procedure by which applications for European patents are examined is set out in the EPC. Patent attorneys
seeking European patents on behalf of their clients have to be as familiar with the EPC as they are with their
national statutes. Other IP practitioners have to be familiar with parts of the Convention. For instance, the
EPC’s provisions on the interpretation of patent claims are incorporated by reference into English law by s.125
Patents 101
Part 2: The Law
PP
2
(3) of the Patents Act 1977. Similarly, disputes between EPO officials and applicants or patentees are referred
to tribunals within the EPO known as “Boards of Appeal”. Barristers specializing in IP law are sometimes
instructed to appear before the Boards of Appeal by English and other patent attorneys.
(3) The PCT makes it cheaper and easier to apply for patents for groups of countries. Under the Paris
Convention
1
an applicant for a patent in one contracting party has up to 12 months to apply for a patent in all the
other contracting countries. This could be an expensive and time consuming exercise which resulted
unnecessary duplication of effort since all patent offices needed to be satisfied of the inventions novelty,
inventiveness and utility. The PCT enables an application to be made to the patent offices of all the countries in
which the applicant seeks protection with a single filing. The application is lodged first with the applicant’s home
patent office. A specialist UN agency known as the World Intellectual Property Organization (“the WIPO”)
2
arranges for basic searches and examinations to be carried out known as “the international phase”. If nothing is
discovered during the international phase to indicate that the invention cannot be patented under any country’s
law the application is passed to the individual patent offices to decide whether the invention merits a patent under
their national laws. That second phase is called “the national phase”. Only patent attorneys who apply for
patents through the PCT need to be familiar with its details but all IP practitioners need to be aware of the treaty
(4) All IP practitioners need to be aware of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property
Rights (“TRIPs”)
3
which was mentioned in Part 1. TRIPs is Annex 1C to the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing
the World Trade Organization. It sets out minimum standards of protection for investment in intellectual assets
(that is to say branding, design, technology and creativity).
(5) Unlike other areas of intellectual property law there is very little EU law. There is no EU patent though
there have been several attempts to agree one. There has been no wholesale attempt to approximate EU
member states’ patent laws though there has been some harmonization with supplementary protection
certificates (“SPC”) and the enforcement of IP rights,
3. Case Law
Patent cases are allocated to two specialist courts within the Chancery Division known respectively as “the
Patents Court” and the “Intellectual Property Enterprise Court” (“IPEC”). Appeal from those Courts lies to the
Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. Decisions of officials within the Intellectual Property Office (“IPO”)
known as “hearing officers” are also reported. Although not binding on English courts, decisions of the EPO’s
Boards of Appeal are sometimes referred to. Decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union with regard
to SPC, enforcement and a few other areas are also important. Decisions of all those courts and tribunals are
reported in the Reports of Patent Cases (“RPC”) and the Fleet Street Reports (“FSR”). Decisions of the Court of
1
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 20 March, 1883, https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/288514
2
www.wipo.int
3
https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_01_e.htm
3
Justice, Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, the Patents Court and IPEC appear on BAILII (British and Irish Legal
Information Institute)
4
. Hearing officers’ decisions appear on the IPO’s pages on the Government website.
5
4. A Closer Look at the Patents Act 1977
(1) This Act came into force on 1 June 1978. It has been amended substantially by the Copyright Designs
and Patents Act 1988, the Patents Act 2004 and the Intellectual Property Act 2014 and to a lesser extent by
various statutory instruments. An unofficial consolidation
6
can be downloaded from the IPO’s pages on the
Government website.
(2) The Act consists of 132 sections divided into 3 Parts and .there are 9 Schedules.
(3) Part I which runs from s.1 to s.76A covers the new domestic law. Part II (s.77 to s.95) international
conventions and Part III (s.96 to s.132) miscellaneous and general provisions.
(4) The most frequently referred to provisions of Part I are:
(a) Patentability (s.1 to s.6)
(b) Entitlement (ss.7, 8, 9, 12 and 13)
(c) Applications, particularly s.14 which is referred to in Part 1
(d) Examination and search (ss.17, 18 and 20)
(e) Provisions after grant, particularly s.24 on publication and certificate of grant, s.25 on the term and s.27 on
amendment after grant
(f) S.37 on the determination of entitlement to a patent after grant
(g) Employees’ inventions (s.39 to s.43)
(h) Licences of right and compulsory licences (s.46 to s.54)
(i) Infringement particularly s.60 and s.61
(j) Threats (s.70 to s.70F)
(k) Declarations of non-infringement (s.71)
(l) Revocation s.72
(m) Examiners’ opinions (s.74A and s.74B)
(n) Amendment (s.75)
(4) S.77 to s.83 are about European patents and European patent applications. Ss.89 and 89A and 89B
concern PCT applications. The provisions for a Community patent have been repealed and the recently inserted
4
https://www.bailii.org/
5
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-challenge-decision-results.htm
6
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/647792/Consolidated_Patent
s_Act_1977_-_1_October_2017.pdf
4
s.88A and s.88B to give effect to the Unified Patent Court Agreement are probably redundant in view of the
government’s indication that it intends to withdraw from that agreement.
7
(5) S.123 enables the Secretary of State to make rules for the regulation of the IPO, processing of patent
applications and other matters. The Patents Rules 2007
8
have been made under these provisions.
(6) S.125 contains important provisions on the construction of claims.
5. A Closer Look at the EPC
(1) The EPC consists of 178 articles divided into 12 Parts.
(2) Art 1 establishes a system of law, common to the Contracting States for the grant of patents for invention.
(3) Art 2 (1) provides that patents granted under the convention shall be called “European patents.” Art 2 (2)
adds:
“The European patent shall, in each of the Contracting States for which it is granted, have the
effect of and be subject to the same conditions as a national patent granted by that State, unless
this Convention provides otherwise.”
Art 3 further provides:
“The grant of a European patent may be requested for one or more of the Contracting States.”
(4) Art 4 (1) establishes the European Patent Organization with two organs one of which is the EPO. The
task of the Organization is to grant European patents which is to be carried out by the EPO.
9
Chapter IIII of Part
I (arts 10 to 25) is concerned with the structure and management of the EPO.
(5) Part II of the EPC is concerned with substantive patent law:
(a) Chapter I (arts 52 to 57) with patentability
(b) Chapter II (arts 58 to 62) with entitlement and inventorship
(c) Art 63 (1) provides that the term of a European patent shall be 20 years from the date of filing of the
application
(d) Art 64 (1) provides that European patent shall confer on its proprietor in each country in respect of which it
is granted, the same rights as would be conferred by a national patent granted.
(e) Art 66 adds:
“A European patent application which has been accorded a date of filing shall, in the designated
Contracting States, be equivalent to a regular national filing, where appropriate with the priority
claimed for the European patent application.”
(f) Art 69 (1) contains one of the most important provisions of the EPC:
7
See Jane Lambert Volte-Face on the Unified Patent Court Agreement 29 Feb 2020 NIPC News
https://nipcnews.blogspot.com/2020/02/volte-face-on-unified-patent-court.html
8
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/694249/Patents-Rules-
2007-06042018.pdf
9
Art 4 (3)
5
“The extent of the protection conferred by a European patent or a European patent application
shall be determined by the claims. Nevertheless, the description and drawings shall be used to
interpret the claims.”
It is to be interpreted in accordance with the Protocol on Interpretation of art 69 which will be considered in
detail in Part 5 of this course.
(g) Chapter IV (arts 71 to 74) is concerned with licensing and assignments
(6) Part III (arts 75 to 105C) is concerned with applications for European patents. Art 99 provides for a
procedure known as “opposition” in which a European patent can be challenged in the EPO within 9 months of
grant.
(7) Part 6 (arts 106 to 112a) establishes an appeal process to independent boards of appeal.
IP Litigation
IP litigation is governed by CPR Part 63
10
, the Part 63 Practice Direction
11
, the Patents Court Guide
12
and the
Intellectual Property Enterprise Court Guide.
13
i
Jane Lambert
4-5 Gray’s Inn Square
London
WC1R 3AH
jane.lambert@nipclaw.com
www.nipclaw.com
+44 (0)20 7404 5252
10
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part63
11
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part63/pd_part63
12
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Patents-Court-Guide-April-2019.pdf
13
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/823201/intellectual-
property-enterprise-guide.pdf

More Related Content

PDF
Patents 101 Part 5 - Infringement
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Patents 101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Patents 101 Part 1 The Basics
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
Patents101 Part 5 -Infringement
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
Patents 101 - Part 2 The Law
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
Patents101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent
Jane Lambert
 
Patents 101 Part 5 - Infringement
Jane Lambert
 
Patents 101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent
Jane Lambert
 
Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability
Jane Lambert
 
Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability
Jane Lambert
 
Patents 101 Part 1 The Basics
Jane Lambert
 
Patents101 Part 5 -Infringement
Jane Lambert
 
Patents 101 - Part 2 The Law
Jane Lambert
 
Patents101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent
Jane Lambert
 

What's hot (19)

PPTX
Patent infringement
PatSnap
 
PDF
IP for Startups and other Small Businesses - Patents
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property
This account is closed
 
PPTX
Patent presentation
SusmithaKasaram1
 
PPT
Doctrine of equivalents
raokavi
 
PPT
Patent Infringement
Hasit Seth
 
PPTX
Patent act 1970
Priyanka Jagtap
 
PPTX
50859610 bofors-scam-ppt
angle7
 
PPTX
Bofors scam by skmr
Shashi Kumar
 
PPTX
Bofors scam for the subject of Business Ethics and CSR
Kartik Mehta
 
PDF
Armslicenseform copy
Atul Kumar Suryavanshi
 
PDF
Drafting of a patent specification
RST ECOENERGY PVT. LTD.
 
PDF
Intellectual property appellate board
Urmila Aswar
 
PPTX
Intellectual property litigations: A case study of Anticancer drug Glivec in ...
Dr Shahid Saache
 
PPTX
Ipab procedures
Altacit Global
 
PPT
Patent damages
Altacit Global
 
PPTX
patenting procedure in india
Takur Singh
 
PDF
Patents Ordinance 2000 - Pakistan
OLY Consultant
 
Patent infringement
PatSnap
 
IP for Startups and other Small Businesses - Patents
Jane Lambert
 
Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property
This account is closed
 
Patent presentation
SusmithaKasaram1
 
Doctrine of equivalents
raokavi
 
Patent Infringement
Hasit Seth
 
Patent act 1970
Priyanka Jagtap
 
50859610 bofors-scam-ppt
angle7
 
Bofors scam by skmr
Shashi Kumar
 
Bofors scam for the subject of Business Ethics and CSR
Kartik Mehta
 
Armslicenseform copy
Atul Kumar Suryavanshi
 
Drafting of a patent specification
RST ECOENERGY PVT. LTD.
 
Intellectual property appellate board
Urmila Aswar
 
Intellectual property litigations: A case study of Anticancer drug Glivec in ...
Dr Shahid Saache
 
Ipab procedures
Altacit Global
 
Patent damages
Altacit Global
 
patenting procedure in india
Takur Singh
 
Patents Ordinance 2000 - Pakistan
OLY Consultant
 
Ad

Similar to Patents 101 Part 2 The Law (20)

PPT
Unitary Patent System
Saravanan A
 
PDF
Patents and alternatives to patenting.pdf
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
The unitary patent and unified patent court
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
International patent registration
PrakharHarit1
 
PPTX
A patent court for europe (david perkins)
JAMSInternational
 
PPT
So You Think You Want a Patent?
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
IPR UNIT-5 intellectual property rights fifth unit power point presentation.
Mahesh Kolloju
 
PPTX
International Patent Law Research :Tools and Strategies
Professor Jon Cavicchi, UNH School of Law
 
PPTX
European Patent Office - general presentation
TechHub Bucharest
 
PDF
Kilburn & Strode - The Unitary Patent and UPC in Europe - Edition 2
Kilburn & Strode LLP
 
PDF
Preparing for the upc
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
Future Challenges in European Patents
Eversheds Sutherland
 
PPT
typesofpatents-111011053928-phpapp02.ppt
PrajwalVKumar
 
PPTX
Intellectual property rights (2)
StudsPlanet.com
 
PPTX
William cass presentation
MecklerMedia
 
PPTX
2013 03-07 unified patent court - publication version
Wouter Pors
 
PDF
Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court
TAG Alliances
 
PPT
The European (EP) grant procedure
TechHub Bucharest
 
PDF
European Intellectual Property Law Text Cases and Materials 1st Edition Annet...
badoyabiku
 
PPT
business low
Nilanjan Bhaumik
 
Unitary Patent System
Saravanan A
 
Patents and alternatives to patenting.pdf
Jane Lambert
 
The unitary patent and unified patent court
Jane Lambert
 
International patent registration
PrakharHarit1
 
A patent court for europe (david perkins)
JAMSInternational
 
So You Think You Want a Patent?
Jane Lambert
 
IPR UNIT-5 intellectual property rights fifth unit power point presentation.
Mahesh Kolloju
 
International Patent Law Research :Tools and Strategies
Professor Jon Cavicchi, UNH School of Law
 
European Patent Office - general presentation
TechHub Bucharest
 
Kilburn & Strode - The Unitary Patent and UPC in Europe - Edition 2
Kilburn & Strode LLP
 
Preparing for the upc
Jane Lambert
 
Future Challenges in European Patents
Eversheds Sutherland
 
typesofpatents-111011053928-phpapp02.ppt
PrajwalVKumar
 
Intellectual property rights (2)
StudsPlanet.com
 
William cass presentation
MecklerMedia
 
2013 03-07 unified patent court - publication version
Wouter Pors
 
Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court
TAG Alliances
 
The European (EP) grant procedure
TechHub Bucharest
 
European Intellectual Property Law Text Cases and Materials 1st Edition Annet...
badoyabiku
 
business low
Nilanjan Bhaumik
 
Ad

More from Jane Lambert (20)

PDF
G2_21 and the English Approach to Plausibility.pdf
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
G2_21 and the English Approach to Plausibility.pptx
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
IP Training for Local Government Officials .pptx
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Safeguarding Your Investment in Convergent Content
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Small Claims Track Checklist
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
The UK YORUBA Trade Mark Registration
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Copyright Licensing and ICT
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
IP After Brexit
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
What every Business in Wales needs to know about Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
What every business in Bradford needs to know about Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
IP After Brexit
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
How Brexit has changed IP Law
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
The Supreme Court Rules on FRAND
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Understanding Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
Patents101- The Basics
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
IP for Makers
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
Searching IP Databases and using what you find
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
IP for Start-ups and other Small and Medium Enterprises
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
World IP Day at M-SParc: "IP, What is is, Why you should know about it, Advic...
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
World IP Day at M-SParc: "What is IP?"
Jane Lambert
 
G2_21 and the English Approach to Plausibility.pdf
Jane Lambert
 
G2_21 and the English Approach to Plausibility.pptx
Jane Lambert
 
IP Training for Local Government Officials .pptx
Jane Lambert
 
Safeguarding Your Investment in Convergent Content
Jane Lambert
 
Small Claims Track Checklist
Jane Lambert
 
The UK YORUBA Trade Mark Registration
Jane Lambert
 
Copyright Licensing and ICT
Jane Lambert
 
IP After Brexit
Jane Lambert
 
What every Business in Wales needs to know about Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
What every business in Bradford needs to know about Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
IP After Brexit
Jane Lambert
 
How Brexit has changed IP Law
Jane Lambert
 
The Supreme Court Rules on FRAND
Jane Lambert
 
Understanding Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
Patents101- The Basics
Jane Lambert
 
IP for Makers
Jane Lambert
 
Searching IP Databases and using what you find
Jane Lambert
 
IP for Start-ups and other Small and Medium Enterprises
Jane Lambert
 
World IP Day at M-SParc: "IP, What is is, Why you should know about it, Advic...
Jane Lambert
 
World IP Day at M-SParc: "What is IP?"
Jane Lambert
 

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Female Giggers' Discrimination - Dr. Yanki Hartijasti.pdf
sakshikothari33
 
PDF
AHRP LB - The Regulatory Framework and Practice of Absentee Land in Indonesia...
AHRP Law Firm
 
PPTX
Katarungang Pambarangay Presentation.pptx
MarkBalagat
 
PPTX
terms of contract under the 1992 Constitution of Ghana.pptx
adigblistevenson6
 
PDF
4286820232025-07-21-611256.pdf Supreme Court
sabranghindi
 
PPTX
CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN 1956 by Shahzaman chandio
Shahzaman Chandio
 
PPTX
Grant Of Patent application process.pptx
blossomjasmine085
 
PPTX
Rule of Strict Interpretation.pptx AND G
DhrumilRanpura1
 
PPTX
The Election Process in India , election system
luckybhagyasri13
 
PDF
Dharmasthala Files (Investigative Report).pdf
rudreshk159
 
PPTX
TRADE UNION ACT 1926(Indian labor law).pptx
Sunaina44
 
PPTX
Military Unit symbols, vision and conclusion
antarikshdhaka
 
PPT
EGMGPLVAW powerpoint (Rowena Guanzon).ppt
delomisoljd
 
PDF
Career Overview of James William Bain of Colorado
James William Bain
 
PPTX
MONEY LAUNDERING IMAGE ON TANZANIA MIRROR.pptx
JOEL EXAVERY
 
PPTX
IP Systems history and develepoment.pptx
blossomjasmine085
 
PDF
Hands of the Land_ Rediscovering Heritage Through Rural Crafts by Jeffrey Kal...
Jeffrey Kaliel
 
PPTX
71 Strategies to Control Legal Expenses.pptx
jamesstapleton21
 
PPTX
OEC.pptxdddfffffffgsjjssuxjdjdussskddiixd
athulpopzz706
 
PPTX
办理UNIR文凭|购买比亚努埃瓦国际大学毕业证Letter办理学历认证国外文凭
xxxihn4u
 
Female Giggers' Discrimination - Dr. Yanki Hartijasti.pdf
sakshikothari33
 
AHRP LB - The Regulatory Framework and Practice of Absentee Land in Indonesia...
AHRP Law Firm
 
Katarungang Pambarangay Presentation.pptx
MarkBalagat
 
terms of contract under the 1992 Constitution of Ghana.pptx
adigblistevenson6
 
4286820232025-07-21-611256.pdf Supreme Court
sabranghindi
 
CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN 1956 by Shahzaman chandio
Shahzaman Chandio
 
Grant Of Patent application process.pptx
blossomjasmine085
 
Rule of Strict Interpretation.pptx AND G
DhrumilRanpura1
 
The Election Process in India , election system
luckybhagyasri13
 
Dharmasthala Files (Investigative Report).pdf
rudreshk159
 
TRADE UNION ACT 1926(Indian labor law).pptx
Sunaina44
 
Military Unit symbols, vision and conclusion
antarikshdhaka
 
EGMGPLVAW powerpoint (Rowena Guanzon).ppt
delomisoljd
 
Career Overview of James William Bain of Colorado
James William Bain
 
MONEY LAUNDERING IMAGE ON TANZANIA MIRROR.pptx
JOEL EXAVERY
 
IP Systems history and develepoment.pptx
blossomjasmine085
 
Hands of the Land_ Rediscovering Heritage Through Rural Crafts by Jeffrey Kal...
Jeffrey Kaliel
 
71 Strategies to Control Legal Expenses.pptx
jamesstapleton21
 
OEC.pptxdddfffffffgsjjssuxjdjdussskddiixd
athulpopzz706
 
办理UNIR文凭|购买比亚努埃瓦国际大学毕业证Letter办理学历认证国外文凭
xxxihn4u
 

Patents 101 Part 2 The Law

  • 1. 1 25 April 2020 Jane Lambert i 1. Sources of Law Like other areas of law, patent law is to be found in enactments and case law. 2. Enactments (1) The principal statute is the Patents Act 1977. This was passed to enable the UK to implement the European Patent Convention (“EPC”) and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”). However, it also contains provisions that were to be found in the Patents Act 1949 and earlier legislation. Practitioners occasionally have to refer to the Patent Law Amendment Act 1852 which established the Patent Office (now known as the Intellectual Property Office (“IPO”) and even the Statue of Monopolies 1623 which preserved patents for inventions as an exception to a comprehensive abolition of monopolies. (2) The EPC established the European Patent Office (“EPO”) which grants patents known as “European patents” on behalf of the governments of the contracting parties. The EPC is not an EU treaty and the EPO is not an EU institution although all EU member states are party to the EPC. The UK remains a contracting party notwithstanding Brexit. European patents are granted for groups of contracting parties designated by patent owners. A European patent designating the UK is known as a “European patent (UK)”. European patents (UK) are treated for all practical purposes as though they were UK patents granted by the IPO. However, the procedure by which applications for European patents are examined is set out in the EPC. Patent attorneys seeking European patents on behalf of their clients have to be as familiar with the EPC as they are with their national statutes. Other IP practitioners have to be familiar with parts of the Convention. For instance, the EPC’s provisions on the interpretation of patent claims are incorporated by reference into English law by s.125 Patents 101 Part 2: The Law PP
  • 2. 2 (3) of the Patents Act 1977. Similarly, disputes between EPO officials and applicants or patentees are referred to tribunals within the EPO known as “Boards of Appeal”. Barristers specializing in IP law are sometimes instructed to appear before the Boards of Appeal by English and other patent attorneys. (3) The PCT makes it cheaper and easier to apply for patents for groups of countries. Under the Paris Convention 1 an applicant for a patent in one contracting party has up to 12 months to apply for a patent in all the other contracting countries. This could be an expensive and time consuming exercise which resulted unnecessary duplication of effort since all patent offices needed to be satisfied of the inventions novelty, inventiveness and utility. The PCT enables an application to be made to the patent offices of all the countries in which the applicant seeks protection with a single filing. The application is lodged first with the applicant’s home patent office. A specialist UN agency known as the World Intellectual Property Organization (“the WIPO”) 2 arranges for basic searches and examinations to be carried out known as “the international phase”. If nothing is discovered during the international phase to indicate that the invention cannot be patented under any country’s law the application is passed to the individual patent offices to decide whether the invention merits a patent under their national laws. That second phase is called “the national phase”. Only patent attorneys who apply for patents through the PCT need to be familiar with its details but all IP practitioners need to be aware of the treaty (4) All IP practitioners need to be aware of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (“TRIPs”) 3 which was mentioned in Part 1. TRIPs is Annex 1C to the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. It sets out minimum standards of protection for investment in intellectual assets (that is to say branding, design, technology and creativity). (5) Unlike other areas of intellectual property law there is very little EU law. There is no EU patent though there have been several attempts to agree one. There has been no wholesale attempt to approximate EU member states’ patent laws though there has been some harmonization with supplementary protection certificates (“SPC”) and the enforcement of IP rights, 3. Case Law Patent cases are allocated to two specialist courts within the Chancery Division known respectively as “the Patents Court” and the “Intellectual Property Enterprise Court” (“IPEC”). Appeal from those Courts lies to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. Decisions of officials within the Intellectual Property Office (“IPO”) known as “hearing officers” are also reported. Although not binding on English courts, decisions of the EPO’s Boards of Appeal are sometimes referred to. Decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union with regard to SPC, enforcement and a few other areas are also important. Decisions of all those courts and tribunals are reported in the Reports of Patent Cases (“RPC”) and the Fleet Street Reports (“FSR”). Decisions of the Court of 1 Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 20 March, 1883, https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/288514 2 www.wipo.int 3 https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_01_e.htm
  • 3. 3 Justice, Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, the Patents Court and IPEC appear on BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute) 4 . Hearing officers’ decisions appear on the IPO’s pages on the Government website. 5 4. A Closer Look at the Patents Act 1977 (1) This Act came into force on 1 June 1978. It has been amended substantially by the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, the Patents Act 2004 and the Intellectual Property Act 2014 and to a lesser extent by various statutory instruments. An unofficial consolidation 6 can be downloaded from the IPO’s pages on the Government website. (2) The Act consists of 132 sections divided into 3 Parts and .there are 9 Schedules. (3) Part I which runs from s.1 to s.76A covers the new domestic law. Part II (s.77 to s.95) international conventions and Part III (s.96 to s.132) miscellaneous and general provisions. (4) The most frequently referred to provisions of Part I are: (a) Patentability (s.1 to s.6) (b) Entitlement (ss.7, 8, 9, 12 and 13) (c) Applications, particularly s.14 which is referred to in Part 1 (d) Examination and search (ss.17, 18 and 20) (e) Provisions after grant, particularly s.24 on publication and certificate of grant, s.25 on the term and s.27 on amendment after grant (f) S.37 on the determination of entitlement to a patent after grant (g) Employees’ inventions (s.39 to s.43) (h) Licences of right and compulsory licences (s.46 to s.54) (i) Infringement particularly s.60 and s.61 (j) Threats (s.70 to s.70F) (k) Declarations of non-infringement (s.71) (l) Revocation s.72 (m) Examiners’ opinions (s.74A and s.74B) (n) Amendment (s.75) (4) S.77 to s.83 are about European patents and European patent applications. Ss.89 and 89A and 89B concern PCT applications. The provisions for a Community patent have been repealed and the recently inserted 4 https://www.bailii.org/ 5 https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-challenge-decision-results.htm 6 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/647792/Consolidated_Patent s_Act_1977_-_1_October_2017.pdf
  • 4. 4 s.88A and s.88B to give effect to the Unified Patent Court Agreement are probably redundant in view of the government’s indication that it intends to withdraw from that agreement. 7 (5) S.123 enables the Secretary of State to make rules for the regulation of the IPO, processing of patent applications and other matters. The Patents Rules 2007 8 have been made under these provisions. (6) S.125 contains important provisions on the construction of claims. 5. A Closer Look at the EPC (1) The EPC consists of 178 articles divided into 12 Parts. (2) Art 1 establishes a system of law, common to the Contracting States for the grant of patents for invention. (3) Art 2 (1) provides that patents granted under the convention shall be called “European patents.” Art 2 (2) adds: “The European patent shall, in each of the Contracting States for which it is granted, have the effect of and be subject to the same conditions as a national patent granted by that State, unless this Convention provides otherwise.” Art 3 further provides: “The grant of a European patent may be requested for one or more of the Contracting States.” (4) Art 4 (1) establishes the European Patent Organization with two organs one of which is the EPO. The task of the Organization is to grant European patents which is to be carried out by the EPO. 9 Chapter IIII of Part I (arts 10 to 25) is concerned with the structure and management of the EPO. (5) Part II of the EPC is concerned with substantive patent law: (a) Chapter I (arts 52 to 57) with patentability (b) Chapter II (arts 58 to 62) with entitlement and inventorship (c) Art 63 (1) provides that the term of a European patent shall be 20 years from the date of filing of the application (d) Art 64 (1) provides that European patent shall confer on its proprietor in each country in respect of which it is granted, the same rights as would be conferred by a national patent granted. (e) Art 66 adds: “A European patent application which has been accorded a date of filing shall, in the designated Contracting States, be equivalent to a regular national filing, where appropriate with the priority claimed for the European patent application.” (f) Art 69 (1) contains one of the most important provisions of the EPC: 7 See Jane Lambert Volte-Face on the Unified Patent Court Agreement 29 Feb 2020 NIPC News https://nipcnews.blogspot.com/2020/02/volte-face-on-unified-patent-court.html 8 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/694249/Patents-Rules- 2007-06042018.pdf 9 Art 4 (3)
  • 5. 5 “The extent of the protection conferred by a European patent or a European patent application shall be determined by the claims. Nevertheless, the description and drawings shall be used to interpret the claims.” It is to be interpreted in accordance with the Protocol on Interpretation of art 69 which will be considered in detail in Part 5 of this course. (g) Chapter IV (arts 71 to 74) is concerned with licensing and assignments (6) Part III (arts 75 to 105C) is concerned with applications for European patents. Art 99 provides for a procedure known as “opposition” in which a European patent can be challenged in the EPO within 9 months of grant. (7) Part 6 (arts 106 to 112a) establishes an appeal process to independent boards of appeal. IP Litigation IP litigation is governed by CPR Part 63 10 , the Part 63 Practice Direction 11 , the Patents Court Guide 12 and the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court Guide. 13 i Jane Lambert 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square London WC1R 3AH [email protected] www.nipclaw.com +44 (0)20 7404 5252 10 https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part63 11 https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part63/pd_part63 12 https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Patents-Court-Guide-April-2019.pdf 13 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/823201/intellectual- property-enterprise-guide.pdf