PATIENT SAFETY 
AND 
RISK MANAGEMENT 
Ibn Al Gumahad, BSN-RN 
Coordinator, Patient Safety 
059 – 272 – 6391 
894-5524 EXT 571 
Quality Management-MDH
Safety Policy Statement 
 Patient comes first. 
 Most valuable resource: 
STAFF 
 Dedicated to a safe and 
healthful environment 
for employees, patients 
and others; 
 Preservation of company 
assets and properties; 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Safety Policy Statement 
 Committed to aggressive 
management of clinical 
and non-clinical (operational) 
risk; 
 Control hazards, minimize 
customer injuries, property 
damage and/or loss; 
 Promoting safety is every 
MDH employee’s 
responsibility. 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Risk is EVERYWHERE ! 
is not an exception! 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 
To develop and implement an integrated 
system of assisting MDH employees in ensuring 
the quality of services by: 
 Identifying 
 Managing 
 Reducing hazards and risks of 
undesirable or adverse events associated with 
service delivery throughout the organization. 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS 
1. Risk Identification 
2. Risk Assessment 
3. Risk Treatments 
4. Review and Follow- 
Up 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
RISK IDENTIFICATION 
 Know the hazards or potential 
risks. 
 Risks when triggered, cause 
problems. 
 Can be internal or external 
(SOURCE ANALYSIS). 
 Events leading to a problem 
are investigated (PROBLEM 
ANALYSIS) 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
RISK ASSESSMENT 
 Potential 
severity of 
damage, loss 
and 
recurrence. 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
RISK TREATMENTS 
 Risk Avoidance 
 Risk Reduction 
 Risk Retention 
 Risk Transfer 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Risk REVIEW & FOLLOW-UP 
 Incident Reporting System 
 Hazards Surveillance Rounds 
 Infection Control Surveillance 
 Hospital Safety Committee 
 Infection Prevention & Control 
Committee 
 Medication Safety 
 Audits, focused studies 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Occurrence Variance Reporting 
System (OVRS) 
VARIANCE – is anything that is 
out of the STANDARDS 
 Incidents are reported thru 
OVR 
 Processed by the Patient 
Safety Coordinator 
 Entered in the data base 
where trends and patterns are 
identified 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Occurrence Variance Reporting 
System (OVRS) 
 Addressed and followed through with 
appropriate individuals and entities. 
SYSTEMS RATHER 
THAN INDIVIDUALS 
IS THE FOCUS OF THE 
OVR. 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
What to REPORT? 
 MEDICATION ERRORS 
 Procedure/Practice 
Variance 
 Security-related 
 Safety-related 
 Patient Variance 
 Miscellaneous 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Sample of OVR Data 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Patient-Related Incidents 
UNKNOWN 
Near Miss 
Minor 
Moderate 
Major 
Severe 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Barriers in reporting incidents 
 What’s in it for 
me? 
 Individuals 
rather 
than 
systems/proces 
ses 
 Punitive 
 No feedback 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Proactive Safety Improvement 
 Gather and analyze 
information about risk-prone 
processes 
 Redesign high-risk 
processes to reduce the 
chance of patient harm 
 Document the process 
 Train people 
 Monitor continuing safety 
of the process 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Steps to Improve Safety 
 Basic Tenets of Human 
Error 
 Everyone commits errors 
 Human error is generally the 
result of circumstances that 
are beyond the conscious 
control of those committing 
the errors. 
 Systems or processes that 
depend on perfect human 
performance are fatally 
flawed. 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Common Causes of Medical Errors 
and Sentinel Events 
 Lack of staff orientation/training 
 Communication failure 
 Medication storage/access 
problems 
 Important information not available 
to caregivers 
 Staff competency/credentialing 
problems 
 Inadequate supervision 
 Inadequate/improper labeling 
 Staff distraction 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Need to Increase Focus 
on the Human Factors 
Human errors occur because of: 
 Inattention 
 Memory lapse 
 Failure to communicate 
 Poorly designed equipment 
 Exhaustion 
 Ignorance 
 Noisy working conditions 
 A number of other personal and 
environmental factors 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
Where to Start ? 
 Consider safety improvement 
recommendations made 
during surveillance rounds 
 Share safety improvement 
ideas 
 Focus attention on high-risk 
processes 
 Incident reports and other 
info are used to identify risk-prone 
patient-care processes 
 Your help is needed – report 
incidents and hazardous 
situations. 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
REMEMBER: 
People Are Set-Up to 
Make Mistakes 
Incompetent people are, at 
most, 1% of the problem. 
The other 99% are good 
people trying to do a good 
job who make very simple 
mistakes and it's the 
processes that set them 
up to make these 
mistakes. 
Dr. Lucian Leape, Harvard School of Public Health 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
INTERNATIONAL PATIENT 
SAFETY GOALS. 
 TO PROMOTE SPECIFIC 
IMPROVEMENT IN PATIENT SAFETY 
 HIGHLIGHT PROBLEMATIC AREAS IN 
HEALTHCARE 
 DESCRIBE EVIDENCE AND EXPERT-BASED 
CONCENSUS SOLUTIONS TO 
THESE PROMBLEMS. 
JOINT COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
IPSG 1. IMPROVE THE 
ACCURACY OF 
PATIENT 
IDENTIFICATION. 
Use at least TWO (2) 
PATIENT IDENTIFIERS: 
1. Complete Name 
2. Medical Record 
Number 
APPL ICABI L ITY OF PATI ENT IDENTI F ICATION: 
1. Eme rg enc y Room 
2. Ope r a t ing Room 
3. L abor a tor y 
4. Radiolog y 
5. Be for e any proc edur e 
6. Be for e prov iding any t r e a tment 
7. At AL L Point s of Ca r e 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
IPSG 2. IMPROVE THE 
EFFECTIVENESS 
OF COMMUNICATION 
1.Verbal and telephone order or 
test resul t is WRITTEN DOWN 
by the receiver of the order. 
2. READ BACK is done by the 
receiver of the order or test resul t . 
3. The order or test resul t is CONFIRMED by the 
individual who gave the order or test resul t . 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
IPSG 3. IMPROVE THE SAFETY 
OF HIGH ALERT 
MEDICATIONS 
Take caution on: 
LOOK-ALIKE / 
SOUND-ALIKE 
MEDICATIONS 
Restricting access 
to CONCENTRATED 
ELECTROLYTES in 
patient care areas. 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
IPSG 4. ENSURE CORRECT SITE, 
CORRECT PROCEDURE, 
CORRECT-PATIENT 
SURGERY 
1. MARKING THE SURGICAL SITE 
for al l cases involving 
lateral i ty, mul t iple st ructures or 
levels. 
2. PRE-OPERATIVE 
VERFICATION PROCESS 
3. TIME OUT is 
held immediately 
before the star t 
of the procedure. 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
IPSG 5. REDUCE THE RISK OF 
HEALTH-CARE 
ASSOCIATED 
INFECTIONS 
• Surgical Site Infection Prevention 
• Hand Hygiene Program 
• Venti lator-Associated Pneumonia 
Prevention 
• C AU T I Prevention 
• Central Line Infection Prevention 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
IPSG 6. REDUCE THE RISK OF 
PATIENT HARM 
RESULTING FROM 
FALLS 
• Fal l Risk Assessment Upon 
Admission 
• Fal l Risk Re-assessment 
After Invasive Procedure 
• Implementation of Patient 
Fal l Management for those 
assessed to be at risked. 
22 NOVEMBER 2014 / ibn_al07@yahoo.com
THANK YOU 
VERY MUCH ! 
Ibn Al Gumahad, BSN-RN 
Coordinator, Patient Safety 
059 – 272 – 6391 
894-5524 EXT 571 
Quality Management-MDH

Patient Safety & Risk Management Staff Orientation

  • 1.
    PATIENT SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT Ibn Al Gumahad, BSN-RN Coordinator, Patient Safety 059 – 272 – 6391 894-5524 EXT 571 Quality Management-MDH
  • 2.
    Safety Policy Statement  Patient comes first.  Most valuable resource: STAFF  Dedicated to a safe and healthful environment for employees, patients and others;  Preservation of company assets and properties; 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 3.
    Safety Policy Statement  Committed to aggressive management of clinical and non-clinical (operational) risk;  Control hazards, minimize customer injuries, property damage and/or loss;  Promoting safety is every MDH employee’s responsibility. 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 4.
    Risk is EVERYWHERE! is not an exception! 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 5.
    RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM To develop and implement an integrated system of assisting MDH employees in ensuring the quality of services by:  Identifying  Managing  Reducing hazards and risks of undesirable or adverse events associated with service delivery throughout the organization. 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 6.
    RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS 1. Risk Identification 2. Risk Assessment 3. Risk Treatments 4. Review and Follow- Up 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 7.
    RISK IDENTIFICATION Know the hazards or potential risks.  Risks when triggered, cause problems.  Can be internal or external (SOURCE ANALYSIS).  Events leading to a problem are investigated (PROBLEM ANALYSIS) 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 8.
    RISK ASSESSMENT Potential severity of damage, loss and recurrence. 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 9.
    RISK TREATMENTS Risk Avoidance  Risk Reduction  Risk Retention  Risk Transfer 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 10.
    Risk REVIEW &FOLLOW-UP  Incident Reporting System  Hazards Surveillance Rounds  Infection Control Surveillance  Hospital Safety Committee  Infection Prevention & Control Committee  Medication Safety  Audits, focused studies 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 11.
    Occurrence Variance Reporting System (OVRS) VARIANCE – is anything that is out of the STANDARDS  Incidents are reported thru OVR  Processed by the Patient Safety Coordinator  Entered in the data base where trends and patterns are identified 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 12.
    Occurrence Variance Reporting System (OVRS)  Addressed and followed through with appropriate individuals and entities. SYSTEMS RATHER THAN INDIVIDUALS IS THE FOCUS OF THE OVR. 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 13.
    What to REPORT?  MEDICATION ERRORS  Procedure/Practice Variance  Security-related  Safety-related  Patient Variance  Miscellaneous 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 14.
    Sample of OVRData 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 15.
    Patient-Related Incidents UNKNOWN Near Miss Minor Moderate Major Severe 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 16.
    Barriers in reportingincidents  What’s in it for me?  Individuals rather than systems/proces ses  Punitive  No feedback 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 17.
    Proactive Safety Improvement  Gather and analyze information about risk-prone processes  Redesign high-risk processes to reduce the chance of patient harm  Document the process  Train people  Monitor continuing safety of the process 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 18.
    Steps to ImproveSafety  Basic Tenets of Human Error  Everyone commits errors  Human error is generally the result of circumstances that are beyond the conscious control of those committing the errors.  Systems or processes that depend on perfect human performance are fatally flawed. 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 19.
    Common Causes ofMedical Errors and Sentinel Events  Lack of staff orientation/training  Communication failure  Medication storage/access problems  Important information not available to caregivers  Staff competency/credentialing problems  Inadequate supervision  Inadequate/improper labeling  Staff distraction 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 20.
    Need to IncreaseFocus on the Human Factors Human errors occur because of:  Inattention  Memory lapse  Failure to communicate  Poorly designed equipment  Exhaustion  Ignorance  Noisy working conditions  A number of other personal and environmental factors 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 21.
    Where to Start?  Consider safety improvement recommendations made during surveillance rounds  Share safety improvement ideas  Focus attention on high-risk processes  Incident reports and other info are used to identify risk-prone patient-care processes  Your help is needed – report incidents and hazardous situations. 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 22.
    REMEMBER: People AreSet-Up to Make Mistakes Incompetent people are, at most, 1% of the problem. The other 99% are good people trying to do a good job who make very simple mistakes and it's the processes that set them up to make these mistakes. Dr. Lucian Leape, Harvard School of Public Health 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 23.
    INTERNATIONAL PATIENT SAFETYGOALS.  TO PROMOTE SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENT IN PATIENT SAFETY  HIGHLIGHT PROBLEMATIC AREAS IN HEALTHCARE  DESCRIBE EVIDENCE AND EXPERT-BASED CONCENSUS SOLUTIONS TO THESE PROMBLEMS. JOINT COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 24.
    IPSG 1. IMPROVETHE ACCURACY OF PATIENT IDENTIFICATION. Use at least TWO (2) PATIENT IDENTIFIERS: 1. Complete Name 2. Medical Record Number APPL ICABI L ITY OF PATI ENT IDENTI F ICATION: 1. Eme rg enc y Room 2. Ope r a t ing Room 3. L abor a tor y 4. Radiolog y 5. Be for e any proc edur e 6. Be for e prov iding any t r e a tment 7. At AL L Point s of Ca r e 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 25.
    IPSG 2. IMPROVETHE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNICATION 1.Verbal and telephone order or test resul t is WRITTEN DOWN by the receiver of the order. 2. READ BACK is done by the receiver of the order or test resul t . 3. The order or test resul t is CONFIRMED by the individual who gave the order or test resul t . 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 26.
    IPSG 3. IMPROVETHE SAFETY OF HIGH ALERT MEDICATIONS Take caution on: LOOK-ALIKE / SOUND-ALIKE MEDICATIONS Restricting access to CONCENTRATED ELECTROLYTES in patient care areas. 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 27.
    IPSG 4. ENSURECORRECT SITE, CORRECT PROCEDURE, CORRECT-PATIENT SURGERY 1. MARKING THE SURGICAL SITE for al l cases involving lateral i ty, mul t iple st ructures or levels. 2. PRE-OPERATIVE VERFICATION PROCESS 3. TIME OUT is held immediately before the star t of the procedure. 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 28.
    IPSG 5. REDUCETHE RISK OF HEALTH-CARE ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS • Surgical Site Infection Prevention • Hand Hygiene Program • Venti lator-Associated Pneumonia Prevention • C AU T I Prevention • Central Line Infection Prevention 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 29.
    IPSG 6. REDUCETHE RISK OF PATIENT HARM RESULTING FROM FALLS • Fal l Risk Assessment Upon Admission • Fal l Risk Re-assessment After Invasive Procedure • Implementation of Patient Fal l Management for those assessed to be at risked. 22 NOVEMBER 2014 / [email protected]
  • 30.
    THANK YOU VERYMUCH ! Ibn Al Gumahad, BSN-RN Coordinator, Patient Safety 059 – 272 – 6391 894-5524 EXT 571 Quality Management-MDH