Chapter 5
Perception, Attitudes,
   and Personality
Learning Goals
• Understand human perceptual processes
  and how people form impressions of others
• Describe types of perceptual error and their
  effects on information people get from their
  environment
• Explain attribution processes and their
  effects on perception and attitudes
Learning Goals (Cont.)
• Discuss the nature of attitudes, how they
  form and how they change
• Explain the different views of human
  personality development
• Discuss some dimensions of personality and
  several personality types
• Recognize the effects of different cultures
  on perception, attitudes, and personality
Chapter Overview
• Introduction
• Perception
• Attitudes
• Personality
• International Aspects of Perception,
  Attitudes, and Personality
• Ethical Issues in Perception, Attitudes, and
  Personality
Perception, Attitudes,
            and Personality
Perception                     Attitudes


                 Chapter 5




                 Personality
Perception
• A cognitive process: lets a person make
  sense of stimuli from the environment
• Affects all senses: sight, touch, taste, smell,
  hearing
• Includes inputs to person and choice of
  inputs to which the person attends
• Stimulus sources: people, events, physical
  objects, ideas
• Helps adaptation to a changing environment
Perception (Cont.)
• Perceptual process
  – Target: object of the person’s perceptual
    process
  – Threshold: minimum information from target
    for the person to notice the target
     • Detection threshold: point at which person notices
       something has changed in her or his environment
     • Recognition threshold: point at which person can
       identify the target or change in the target

               See text book Figure 5.1
Perception (Cont.)
• Perceptual process (cont.)
  – Target emerges from its surrounding context
    sometimes slowly, sometimes quickly
  – Quickly discriminate a high-contrast target
    from its background; an ambiguous target takes
    more time to see
  – Contrast can come from the target's size, color,
    loudness, or smell
Perception (Cont.)
• Perceptual process (cont.)
  – People attend more quickly to positively valued
    stimuli than to negatively valued stimuli
  – Example: achievement-oriented employees
    notice announcements about promotion
    opportunities faster than an employee with less
    achievement motivation
Perception (Cont.)
• Perceptual defense: shield self from
  negatively valued stimuli
  – Example: block out annoying sounds
  – Organizational example: block some feedback
    from a supervisor or coworker when it is
    negative
Perception (Cont.)
• Perceptual errors: mistakes in the
  perceptual process
  – Perceptual set
     • Beliefs about a target based on information about
       the target or previous experiences with it
     • Information about the target from any source
     • Beliefs act like instructions for processing stimuli
       from the target
Perception (Cont.)
• Perceptual errors (cont.)
  – Stereotype: beliefs and perceived attributes
    about a target based on the target’s group
  – Examples
     • American university students: energetic and
       spontaneous
     • Russian university students: orderly and obedient
Self-Perception:
           A View of Self
• Self-perception: process by which people
  develop a view of themselves
• Develops from social interaction within
  different groups, including groups
  encountered on the Internet
• Self-perception has three parts: self-
  concept, self-esteem, self-presentation
Self-Perception:
       A View of Self (Cont.)
• Self-concept:
  – Set of beliefs people have about themselves
  – View people hold of their personal qualities and
    attributes
  – Factors affecting a person's self-concept
     • Observations of behavior
     • Recall of past significant events
     • Effect of the surrounding social context
Self-Perception:
       A View of Self (Cont.)
• Self-concept (cont.)
  – Observations of behavior
     • People see their behavior, and their situation, in the
       same way they see the behavior of other people
     • Person believes the behavior occurred voluntarily:
       concludes the behavior happened because of some
       personal quality or attribute
Self-Perception:
       A View of Self (Cont.)
• Self-concept (cont.)
  – Observations of behavior (cont.)
     • People learn about themselves by comparing
       themselves to other people with similar qualities
     • Example: you may want to assess your abilities to
       hold a supervisory position. You compare yourself
       to people with backgrounds similar to yours who
       have had recent promotions
Self-Perception:
       A View of Self (Cont.)
• Self-concept (cont.)
  – Recall of past significant events and effect of
    the surrounding social context
     • Recall events important in their lives; not error free
     • Tend to recall events they attribute to themselves
       and not to a situation or other people
     • Often overestimate their role in past events
     • Place more weight on the effects of their behavior
       and less on the surrounding situation or other people
Self-Perception:
       A View of Self (Cont.)
• Self-esteem
  – Emotional dimension of self-perception
  – Positive and negative judgments people have of
    themselves
  – People with low self-esteem tend to be
    unsuccessful; do not adapt well to stressful
    events
  – Those with high self-esteem have the opposite
    experiences
Self-Perception:
       A View of Self (Cont.)
• Self-awareness
  – People differ in degree of self-awareness
  – Two forms
     • Private self-consciousness: behave according to
       attend to inner feelings and standards
     • Public self-consciousness: behave according to
       social standard correct for the situation
Self-Perception:
       A View of Self (Cont.)
• Self-presentation
  – Behavioral strategies people use to affect how
    others see them
  – How they think about themselves
  – Goals of self-presentation
     • Affect other people's impressions to win their
       approval
     • Increase the person's influence in a situation
     • Ensure that others have an accurate impression of
       the person
Self-Perception:
       A View of Self (Cont.)
• Self-presentation (cont.)
  – Highly conscious of public image: change
    behavior from situation to situation. Readily
    conform to situational norms
  – People who want others to perceive them in a
    particular way behave consistently in different
    situations. They act in ways they perceive as
    true to themselves with little regard for the
    norms of the situation
Social Perception:
           A View of Others
• Social perception: process by which
  people come to know and understand each
  other
• Forming impression of a person: perceiver
  first observes the person, the situation, and
  the person's behavior
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Form a quick impression by making a snap
  judgment about that person, or
• Make attributions and integrate the
  attributions to form a final impression
• Confirmation biases lead the perceiver to
  hold tenaciously to it
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Elements of social perception
  – Three sets of clues help form the impression of
    another person
     • Person
     • Situation surrounding the person
     • Observed behavior of the person
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Elements of social perception (cont.)
  – Developing first impressions
     • Use different physical aspects of the person: height,
       weight, hair color, eyeglasses
     • Stereotypes based on physical features
        – Thin men: tense, suspicious, stubborn
        – Blond women: fun loving
        – Neatly dressed people: responsible
     • Stereotypes result from attributing qualities to
       people based on previously formed perceptions
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Elements of social perception (cont.)
  – Preconceptions about the situations in which
    we see the behavior of other people
  – Develop from experience with the same or
    similar situations
  – Situation raises expectations about behavior the
    situation should cause
  – Example: when two people are introduced, we
    expect both parties to acknowledge the other
    and probably to shake hands
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Attribution processes
  – People use attribution processes to explain the
    causes of behavior they see in others
  – Begins with a quick personal attribution
    followed by adjustment based on the
    characteristics of the situation
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Personal attribution
  – Characteristics of the person such as beliefs,
    disposition, or personality, and not the
    situation, caused the person's behavior
  – Example: when you conclude that another
    student spends many hours completing a
    project because he likes to work hard or values
    hard work, you are making a personal
    attribution
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Situational attribution
  – Aspects of the situation, not qualities of the
    person, cause the person's behavior
  – Example: a student worked hard because of the
    reward of a good grade
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Perceiver uses three types of information
  when forming an attribution
  – Consensus information
  – Distinctiveness information
  – Consistency information
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Consensus information
  – Observe other people in the same or a similar
    situation
     • If other people show the same behavior as the target
       person, the situation caused the behavior
     • If other people behave differently from the target
       person, the person caused the behavior
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Distinctiveness information
  – Observe the target person in a different
    situation
     • If the response is different in the new situation, the
       situation caused the behavior
     • If the response is the same, the person caused the
       behavior
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Consistency information
  – Observe the target person in a similar situation,
    but at a different time
     • High consistency: same behavior at both times
     • Low consistency: different behavior at both times
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Combine consensus, distinctiveness, and
  consistency information to form attribution
  – Personal attribution: behavior high in
    consistency; low in consensus and
    distinctiveness
  – Situational attribution: behavior high in
    consensus and distinctiveness; low in
    consistency
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Fundamental attribution error
  – Observer underestimates situation as cause of
    behavior; overestimates the as cause
  – Explaining their behavior: tend to ascribe
    causes to the situation, not to personal qualities
  – Explaining other’s behavior: tend to ascribe its
    causes to personal qualities, not the situation
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• False consensus
  – Overestimate the degree to which others agree
    with the person's view
  – Reinforces the view the perceiver has of
    another person
Social Perception:
     A View of Others (Cont.)
• Integration of attributions to form final
  impression: disposition of perceiver
  – Effects of recent experiences: positive or
    negative event just before meeting someone for
    the first time can affect the impression of the
    person
  – Mood at time of first meeting:
     • Positive impressions in a good mood
     • Negative impressions in a bad mood
Attitudes
• An attitude is “a learned predisposition to
  respond in a consistently favorable or
  unfavorable manner with respect to a given
  object”
• Attitude object: physical objects, issues,
  ideas, events, people, places
Attitudes (Cont.)
• Parts of an attitude
  – Cognitive: perceptions and beliefs about an
    attitude object
  – Affective: feelings about an attitude object
  – Behavioral intentions: how the person wants
    to behave and what a person says about an
    attitude object
Attitudes (Cont.)
• Common work attitudes
  – Organizational commitment
  – Satisfaction
  – Job involvement
• Play a role in employee turnover
Attitudes (Cont.)
• Some connection between attitudes and
  behavior, although not strong
  – People with strong attitudes about an object
    will likely behave in accord with their attitude
  – Strong positive attitudes about Macintosh©
    computers leads to buying one
  – Ardent followers of Jesse Jackson will likely
    vote for him
Attitudes (Cont.)
• Attitude formation: affected by the
  person’s beliefs about an object and the
  amount and type of information the person
  has about the object
  – Perceives positive attributes: develops positive
    attitude
  – Perceives negative attributes: develops
    negative attitude
Attitudes (Cont.)
• Attitude formation (cont.)
  –   Family upbringing
  –   Peer groups
  –   Work groups
  –   General social experiences
Attitudes (Cont.)
• Attitude change
  – Something persuades the person to shift his or
    her attitudes (persuasive communication)
  – Norms of a social group can affect a person’s
    attitude (social norms)
  – Person becomes uncomfortable with some
    aspects of her or his beliefs (cognitive
    dissonance)
Attitudes (Cont.)
• Persuasive communication
  –   Advertising
  –   Tries to change cognitive part of attitude
  –   Assumes affective part will also change
  –   Attitude change process
       •   Win target’s attention
       •   Understand message
       •   Accept the influence
       •   Remember the message
Attitudes (Cont.)
• Social influence on attitudes
  – People are embedded in social groups
  – Feel pressures to conform to norms
  – If person values membership in group, likely
    will align attitudes with the group norms
Attitudes (Cont.)
• Cognitive dissonance
  – Hold multiple beliefs or cognitions about an
    attitude object
  – Feel tension when discrepancies develop
  – Motivated to reduce the tension
  – Change one or more cognitions
  – Other parts of attitude also change
Personality
• Set of traits, characteristics, and
  predispositions of a person
• Usually matures and stabilizes by about age
  30
• Affects how a person adjusts to different
  environments
Personality Theories
• Cognitive theory: people develop their
  thinking patterns as their life unfolds
• Learning theories: behavior patterns
  develop from the social environment
• Biological theories: personality as
  genetically inherited
Personality Theories (Cont.)
• Cognitive theory
  – Develop thinking patterns as life unfolds
  – Affects how the person interprets and
    internalizes life's events
  – Cognitive development stages
     • Reflexive behavior of infant
     • More complex modes of perception and
       interpretation of events
  – Neither driven by instincts nor unwittingly
    shaped by environmental influences
Personality Theories (Cont.)
• Learning theories
  – Learn behavior from social interaction with
    other people
  – Young child: early family socialization
  – Continuously learn from social environment:
    stable behavior forms the personality
  – Uniqueness of each personality follows from
    variability in social experiences
Personality Theories (Cont.)
• Biological theories
  – Ethological theory
     • Develop common characteristics as a result of
       evolution
     • Behavioral characteristics that have helped survival
       over generations become inborn characteristics
Personality Theories (Cont.)
• Biological theories (cont.)
  – Behavior genetics
     • Individual's unique gene structure affects
       personality development
     • Personality develops from interactions between a
       person's genetic structure and social environment
The Big-Five
      Personality Dimensions
• Extroversion
  – High: talkative, sociable
  – Low: reserved, introverted
• Emotional stability
  – High: calm, relaxed
  – Low: worried, depressed
• Agreeableness
  – High: cooperative, tolerant
  – Low: rude, cold
The Big-Five
 Personality Dimensions (Cont.)
• Conscientiousness
  – High: dependable, thorough
  – Low: sloppy, careless
• Openness to experience
  – High: curious, intelligent
  – Low: simple, conventional

          Assess yourself on each dimension
Personality Types
• Locus of control: people control the
  consequences of their actions or are
  controlled by external factors
  – External control: luck, fate, or powerful
    external forces control one’s destiny
  – Internal control: believe they control what
    happens to them
          Assess yourself against each type.
Personality Types (Cont.)
• Machiavellianism
  –   Holds cynical views of other people's motives
  –   Places little value on honesty
  –   Approaches the world with manipulative intent
  –   Maintains distance between self and others
  –   Emotionally detached from other people
  –   Suspicious interpersonal orientation can
      contribute to high interpersonal conflict
Personality Types (Cont.)
• Machiavellianism (cont.)
  – Focus on personal goals, even if reaching them
    requires unethical behavior
  – Suspicious orientation leads to view of
    organizational world as a web of political
    processes
Personality Types (Cont.)
• Type A personality: a keen sense of time
  urgency, focuses excessively on
  achievement, aggressive
  Type B personality: strong self-esteem,
  even tempered, no sense of time urgency

 Type A: significant risk factor for coronary heart disease.
Personality Types (Cont.)
• Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
  – Popular personality assessment device
  – Four bi-polar dimensions
     •   Extroverted (E) - introverted (I)
     •   Sensing (S) - intuitive (I)
     •   Thinking (T) - feeling (F)
     •   Perceiving (P) - judging (J)
  – Assigns people to one of sixteen types based on
    these dimensions
Personality Types (Cont.)
• Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
  (cont.)
  –   Extroverts look outward; introverts turn inward
  –   Sensers use data; intuitives use hunches
  –   Thinkers are objective; feelers are subjective
  –   Perceivers are flexible; judgers want closure
  –   ESTJ type: extroverted, sensing, thinking, and
      judging
International Aspects of
         Perception, Attitudes,
            and Personality
• Culturally based stereotypes
  –   Swiss: punctual
  –   Germans: task-oriented
  –   Americans: energetic
  –   People who hold these stereotypes experience
      surprises when they meet people from these
      countries who do not fit the stereotypes
International Aspects of
       Perception, Attitudes,
      and Personality (Cont.)
• Culturally based stereotypes (cont.)
  – Project aspects of own culture onto people and
    situations in a different culture
  – Assumes that the new culture mirrors their own
  – Example: Korean manager visiting Sweden
    assumes all women seated behind desks are
    secretaries
  – Such behavior would be inappropriate and
    possibly dysfunctional in Sweden where many
    women hold management positions
International Aspects of
       Perception, Attitudes,
      and Personality (Cont.)
• Attitudes about organizational design,
  management, and decision making:
  – U.S. managers: a hierarchical organizational
    design helps solve problems and guides the
    division of labor in the organization
  – French and Italian managers: a hierarchical
    design lets people know authority relationships
    in the organization
International Aspects of
             Perception, Attitudes,
            and Personality (Cont.)
    • Attitudes (cont.)
        – Italian managers: bypassing a manager to reach
          a subordinate employee is insubordination
        – Swedish and Austrian organizations:
          decentralized decision making
        – Philippine and Indian organizations:
          centralized decision making
Conclusion: Organizations that cross national borders and draw
managers from many different countries have high conflict potential.
International Aspects of
       Perception, Attitudes,
      and Personality (Cont.)
• Personality characteristics
  – People in individualistic cultures (United
    States) have a stronger need for autonomy than
    people in group-oriented cultures (Japan)
  – People in cultures that emphasize avoiding
    uncertainty (Belgium, Peru) have a stronger
    need for security than people in cultures that
    are less concerned about avoiding uncertainty
    (Singapore, Ireland)
Ethical Issues in
        Perception, Attitudes,
           and Personality
• Stereotypes and workforce diversity
  – Can have inaccurate stereotypes about the
    ethics of people with different social, racial,
    and ethnic backgrounds
  – These stereotypes can affect the opinions
    people develop about the ethical behavior of
    such people in the workplace
Ethical Issues in
        Perception, Attitudes,
       and Personality (Cont.)
• Self-presentation
  – Deliberately managing self-presentations so
    decisions and behavior appear ethical
  – Limited experimental evidence suggests one
    can favorably manage other people's
    impressions of their ethical attitudes
Ethical Issues in
        Perception, Attitudes,
       and Personality (Cont.)
• Attribution and accountability
  – Individual responsibility is central to ethical
    behavior
     • Attribution of responsibility to a person: person
       behaved ethically or unethically
     • Attribution of responsibility to the situation:
       individual not held accountable
     • Example: observer believed the person had behaved
       unethically because of a directive
  – Errors in attribution: could conclude that he or
    she was not responsible for an unethical act
Ethical Issues in
        Perception, Attitudes,
       and Personality (Cont.)
• Ethical attitudes
  – Little reliable and valid information about
    ethical attitudes
  – Some evidence points to the absence of a fixed
    set of ethical attitudes among managers
  – Attitudes about ethics in organizations and
    decision making are situational and varying
  – The morality of behavior and decisions is
    determined by their social context, not by
    abstract and absolute rules

Perception, Attitudes, and Personality

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Learning Goals • Understandhuman perceptual processes and how people form impressions of others • Describe types of perceptual error and their effects on information people get from their environment • Explain attribution processes and their effects on perception and attitudes
  • 3.
    Learning Goals (Cont.) •Discuss the nature of attitudes, how they form and how they change • Explain the different views of human personality development • Discuss some dimensions of personality and several personality types • Recognize the effects of different cultures on perception, attitudes, and personality
  • 4.
    Chapter Overview • Introduction •Perception • Attitudes • Personality • International Aspects of Perception, Attitudes, and Personality • Ethical Issues in Perception, Attitudes, and Personality
  • 5.
    Perception, Attitudes, and Personality Perception Attitudes Chapter 5 Personality
  • 6.
    Perception • A cognitiveprocess: lets a person make sense of stimuli from the environment • Affects all senses: sight, touch, taste, smell, hearing • Includes inputs to person and choice of inputs to which the person attends • Stimulus sources: people, events, physical objects, ideas • Helps adaptation to a changing environment
  • 7.
    Perception (Cont.) • Perceptualprocess – Target: object of the person’s perceptual process – Threshold: minimum information from target for the person to notice the target • Detection threshold: point at which person notices something has changed in her or his environment • Recognition threshold: point at which person can identify the target or change in the target See text book Figure 5.1
  • 8.
    Perception (Cont.) • Perceptualprocess (cont.) – Target emerges from its surrounding context sometimes slowly, sometimes quickly – Quickly discriminate a high-contrast target from its background; an ambiguous target takes more time to see – Contrast can come from the target's size, color, loudness, or smell
  • 9.
    Perception (Cont.) • Perceptualprocess (cont.) – People attend more quickly to positively valued stimuli than to negatively valued stimuli – Example: achievement-oriented employees notice announcements about promotion opportunities faster than an employee with less achievement motivation
  • 10.
    Perception (Cont.) • Perceptualdefense: shield self from negatively valued stimuli – Example: block out annoying sounds – Organizational example: block some feedback from a supervisor or coworker when it is negative
  • 11.
    Perception (Cont.) • Perceptualerrors: mistakes in the perceptual process – Perceptual set • Beliefs about a target based on information about the target or previous experiences with it • Information about the target from any source • Beliefs act like instructions for processing stimuli from the target
  • 12.
    Perception (Cont.) • Perceptualerrors (cont.) – Stereotype: beliefs and perceived attributes about a target based on the target’s group – Examples • American university students: energetic and spontaneous • Russian university students: orderly and obedient
  • 13.
    Self-Perception: A View of Self • Self-perception: process by which people develop a view of themselves • Develops from social interaction within different groups, including groups encountered on the Internet • Self-perception has three parts: self- concept, self-esteem, self-presentation
  • 14.
    Self-Perception: A View of Self (Cont.) • Self-concept: – Set of beliefs people have about themselves – View people hold of their personal qualities and attributes – Factors affecting a person's self-concept • Observations of behavior • Recall of past significant events • Effect of the surrounding social context
  • 15.
    Self-Perception: A View of Self (Cont.) • Self-concept (cont.) – Observations of behavior • People see their behavior, and their situation, in the same way they see the behavior of other people • Person believes the behavior occurred voluntarily: concludes the behavior happened because of some personal quality or attribute
  • 16.
    Self-Perception: A View of Self (Cont.) • Self-concept (cont.) – Observations of behavior (cont.) • People learn about themselves by comparing themselves to other people with similar qualities • Example: you may want to assess your abilities to hold a supervisory position. You compare yourself to people with backgrounds similar to yours who have had recent promotions
  • 17.
    Self-Perception: A View of Self (Cont.) • Self-concept (cont.) – Recall of past significant events and effect of the surrounding social context • Recall events important in their lives; not error free • Tend to recall events they attribute to themselves and not to a situation or other people • Often overestimate their role in past events • Place more weight on the effects of their behavior and less on the surrounding situation or other people
  • 18.
    Self-Perception: A View of Self (Cont.) • Self-esteem – Emotional dimension of self-perception – Positive and negative judgments people have of themselves – People with low self-esteem tend to be unsuccessful; do not adapt well to stressful events – Those with high self-esteem have the opposite experiences
  • 19.
    Self-Perception: A View of Self (Cont.) • Self-awareness – People differ in degree of self-awareness – Two forms • Private self-consciousness: behave according to attend to inner feelings and standards • Public self-consciousness: behave according to social standard correct for the situation
  • 20.
    Self-Perception: A View of Self (Cont.) • Self-presentation – Behavioral strategies people use to affect how others see them – How they think about themselves – Goals of self-presentation • Affect other people's impressions to win their approval • Increase the person's influence in a situation • Ensure that others have an accurate impression of the person
  • 21.
    Self-Perception: A View of Self (Cont.) • Self-presentation (cont.) – Highly conscious of public image: change behavior from situation to situation. Readily conform to situational norms – People who want others to perceive them in a particular way behave consistently in different situations. They act in ways they perceive as true to themselves with little regard for the norms of the situation
  • 22.
    Social Perception: A View of Others • Social perception: process by which people come to know and understand each other • Forming impression of a person: perceiver first observes the person, the situation, and the person's behavior
  • 23.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Form a quick impression by making a snap judgment about that person, or • Make attributions and integrate the attributions to form a final impression • Confirmation biases lead the perceiver to hold tenaciously to it
  • 24.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Elements of social perception – Three sets of clues help form the impression of another person • Person • Situation surrounding the person • Observed behavior of the person
  • 25.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Elements of social perception (cont.) – Developing first impressions • Use different physical aspects of the person: height, weight, hair color, eyeglasses • Stereotypes based on physical features – Thin men: tense, suspicious, stubborn – Blond women: fun loving – Neatly dressed people: responsible • Stereotypes result from attributing qualities to people based on previously formed perceptions
  • 26.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Elements of social perception (cont.) – Preconceptions about the situations in which we see the behavior of other people – Develop from experience with the same or similar situations – Situation raises expectations about behavior the situation should cause – Example: when two people are introduced, we expect both parties to acknowledge the other and probably to shake hands
  • 27.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Attribution processes – People use attribution processes to explain the causes of behavior they see in others – Begins with a quick personal attribution followed by adjustment based on the characteristics of the situation
  • 28.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Personal attribution – Characteristics of the person such as beliefs, disposition, or personality, and not the situation, caused the person's behavior – Example: when you conclude that another student spends many hours completing a project because he likes to work hard or values hard work, you are making a personal attribution
  • 29.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Situational attribution – Aspects of the situation, not qualities of the person, cause the person's behavior – Example: a student worked hard because of the reward of a good grade
  • 30.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Perceiver uses three types of information when forming an attribution – Consensus information – Distinctiveness information – Consistency information
  • 31.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Consensus information – Observe other people in the same or a similar situation • If other people show the same behavior as the target person, the situation caused the behavior • If other people behave differently from the target person, the person caused the behavior
  • 32.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Distinctiveness information – Observe the target person in a different situation • If the response is different in the new situation, the situation caused the behavior • If the response is the same, the person caused the behavior
  • 33.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Consistency information – Observe the target person in a similar situation, but at a different time • High consistency: same behavior at both times • Low consistency: different behavior at both times
  • 34.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Combine consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information to form attribution – Personal attribution: behavior high in consistency; low in consensus and distinctiveness – Situational attribution: behavior high in consensus and distinctiveness; low in consistency
  • 35.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Fundamental attribution error – Observer underestimates situation as cause of behavior; overestimates the as cause – Explaining their behavior: tend to ascribe causes to the situation, not to personal qualities – Explaining other’s behavior: tend to ascribe its causes to personal qualities, not the situation
  • 36.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • False consensus – Overestimate the degree to which others agree with the person's view – Reinforces the view the perceiver has of another person
  • 37.
    Social Perception: A View of Others (Cont.) • Integration of attributions to form final impression: disposition of perceiver – Effects of recent experiences: positive or negative event just before meeting someone for the first time can affect the impression of the person – Mood at time of first meeting: • Positive impressions in a good mood • Negative impressions in a bad mood
  • 38.
    Attitudes • An attitudeis “a learned predisposition to respond in a consistently favorable or unfavorable manner with respect to a given object” • Attitude object: physical objects, issues, ideas, events, people, places
  • 39.
    Attitudes (Cont.) • Partsof an attitude – Cognitive: perceptions and beliefs about an attitude object – Affective: feelings about an attitude object – Behavioral intentions: how the person wants to behave and what a person says about an attitude object
  • 40.
    Attitudes (Cont.) • Commonwork attitudes – Organizational commitment – Satisfaction – Job involvement • Play a role in employee turnover
  • 41.
    Attitudes (Cont.) • Someconnection between attitudes and behavior, although not strong – People with strong attitudes about an object will likely behave in accord with their attitude – Strong positive attitudes about Macintosh© computers leads to buying one – Ardent followers of Jesse Jackson will likely vote for him
  • 42.
    Attitudes (Cont.) • Attitudeformation: affected by the person’s beliefs about an object and the amount and type of information the person has about the object – Perceives positive attributes: develops positive attitude – Perceives negative attributes: develops negative attitude
  • 43.
    Attitudes (Cont.) • Attitudeformation (cont.) – Family upbringing – Peer groups – Work groups – General social experiences
  • 44.
    Attitudes (Cont.) • Attitudechange – Something persuades the person to shift his or her attitudes (persuasive communication) – Norms of a social group can affect a person’s attitude (social norms) – Person becomes uncomfortable with some aspects of her or his beliefs (cognitive dissonance)
  • 45.
    Attitudes (Cont.) • Persuasivecommunication – Advertising – Tries to change cognitive part of attitude – Assumes affective part will also change – Attitude change process • Win target’s attention • Understand message • Accept the influence • Remember the message
  • 46.
    Attitudes (Cont.) • Socialinfluence on attitudes – People are embedded in social groups – Feel pressures to conform to norms – If person values membership in group, likely will align attitudes with the group norms
  • 47.
    Attitudes (Cont.) • Cognitivedissonance – Hold multiple beliefs or cognitions about an attitude object – Feel tension when discrepancies develop – Motivated to reduce the tension – Change one or more cognitions – Other parts of attitude also change
  • 48.
    Personality • Set oftraits, characteristics, and predispositions of a person • Usually matures and stabilizes by about age 30 • Affects how a person adjusts to different environments
  • 49.
    Personality Theories • Cognitivetheory: people develop their thinking patterns as their life unfolds • Learning theories: behavior patterns develop from the social environment • Biological theories: personality as genetically inherited
  • 50.
    Personality Theories (Cont.) •Cognitive theory – Develop thinking patterns as life unfolds – Affects how the person interprets and internalizes life's events – Cognitive development stages • Reflexive behavior of infant • More complex modes of perception and interpretation of events – Neither driven by instincts nor unwittingly shaped by environmental influences
  • 51.
    Personality Theories (Cont.) •Learning theories – Learn behavior from social interaction with other people – Young child: early family socialization – Continuously learn from social environment: stable behavior forms the personality – Uniqueness of each personality follows from variability in social experiences
  • 52.
    Personality Theories (Cont.) •Biological theories – Ethological theory • Develop common characteristics as a result of evolution • Behavioral characteristics that have helped survival over generations become inborn characteristics
  • 53.
    Personality Theories (Cont.) •Biological theories (cont.) – Behavior genetics • Individual's unique gene structure affects personality development • Personality develops from interactions between a person's genetic structure and social environment
  • 54.
    The Big-Five Personality Dimensions • Extroversion – High: talkative, sociable – Low: reserved, introverted • Emotional stability – High: calm, relaxed – Low: worried, depressed • Agreeableness – High: cooperative, tolerant – Low: rude, cold
  • 55.
    The Big-Five PersonalityDimensions (Cont.) • Conscientiousness – High: dependable, thorough – Low: sloppy, careless • Openness to experience – High: curious, intelligent – Low: simple, conventional Assess yourself on each dimension
  • 56.
    Personality Types • Locusof control: people control the consequences of their actions or are controlled by external factors – External control: luck, fate, or powerful external forces control one’s destiny – Internal control: believe they control what happens to them Assess yourself against each type.
  • 57.
    Personality Types (Cont.) •Machiavellianism – Holds cynical views of other people's motives – Places little value on honesty – Approaches the world with manipulative intent – Maintains distance between self and others – Emotionally detached from other people – Suspicious interpersonal orientation can contribute to high interpersonal conflict
  • 58.
    Personality Types (Cont.) •Machiavellianism (cont.) – Focus on personal goals, even if reaching them requires unethical behavior – Suspicious orientation leads to view of organizational world as a web of political processes
  • 59.
    Personality Types (Cont.) •Type A personality: a keen sense of time urgency, focuses excessively on achievement, aggressive Type B personality: strong self-esteem, even tempered, no sense of time urgency Type A: significant risk factor for coronary heart disease.
  • 60.
    Personality Types (Cont.) •Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) – Popular personality assessment device – Four bi-polar dimensions • Extroverted (E) - introverted (I) • Sensing (S) - intuitive (I) • Thinking (T) - feeling (F) • Perceiving (P) - judging (J) – Assigns people to one of sixteen types based on these dimensions
  • 61.
    Personality Types (Cont.) •Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) (cont.) – Extroverts look outward; introverts turn inward – Sensers use data; intuitives use hunches – Thinkers are objective; feelers are subjective – Perceivers are flexible; judgers want closure – ESTJ type: extroverted, sensing, thinking, and judging
  • 62.
    International Aspects of Perception, Attitudes, and Personality • Culturally based stereotypes – Swiss: punctual – Germans: task-oriented – Americans: energetic – People who hold these stereotypes experience surprises when they meet people from these countries who do not fit the stereotypes
  • 63.
    International Aspects of Perception, Attitudes, and Personality (Cont.) • Culturally based stereotypes (cont.) – Project aspects of own culture onto people and situations in a different culture – Assumes that the new culture mirrors their own – Example: Korean manager visiting Sweden assumes all women seated behind desks are secretaries – Such behavior would be inappropriate and possibly dysfunctional in Sweden where many women hold management positions
  • 64.
    International Aspects of Perception, Attitudes, and Personality (Cont.) • Attitudes about organizational design, management, and decision making: – U.S. managers: a hierarchical organizational design helps solve problems and guides the division of labor in the organization – French and Italian managers: a hierarchical design lets people know authority relationships in the organization
  • 65.
    International Aspects of Perception, Attitudes, and Personality (Cont.) • Attitudes (cont.) – Italian managers: bypassing a manager to reach a subordinate employee is insubordination – Swedish and Austrian organizations: decentralized decision making – Philippine and Indian organizations: centralized decision making Conclusion: Organizations that cross national borders and draw managers from many different countries have high conflict potential.
  • 66.
    International Aspects of Perception, Attitudes, and Personality (Cont.) • Personality characteristics – People in individualistic cultures (United States) have a stronger need for autonomy than people in group-oriented cultures (Japan) – People in cultures that emphasize avoiding uncertainty (Belgium, Peru) have a stronger need for security than people in cultures that are less concerned about avoiding uncertainty (Singapore, Ireland)
  • 67.
    Ethical Issues in Perception, Attitudes, and Personality • Stereotypes and workforce diversity – Can have inaccurate stereotypes about the ethics of people with different social, racial, and ethnic backgrounds – These stereotypes can affect the opinions people develop about the ethical behavior of such people in the workplace
  • 68.
    Ethical Issues in Perception, Attitudes, and Personality (Cont.) • Self-presentation – Deliberately managing self-presentations so decisions and behavior appear ethical – Limited experimental evidence suggests one can favorably manage other people's impressions of their ethical attitudes
  • 69.
    Ethical Issues in Perception, Attitudes, and Personality (Cont.) • Attribution and accountability – Individual responsibility is central to ethical behavior • Attribution of responsibility to a person: person behaved ethically or unethically • Attribution of responsibility to the situation: individual not held accountable • Example: observer believed the person had behaved unethically because of a directive – Errors in attribution: could conclude that he or she was not responsible for an unethical act
  • 70.
    Ethical Issues in Perception, Attitudes, and Personality (Cont.) • Ethical attitudes – Little reliable and valid information about ethical attitudes – Some evidence points to the absence of a fixed set of ethical attitudes among managers – Attitudes about ethics in organizations and decision making are situational and varying – The morality of behavior and decisions is determined by their social context, not by abstract and absolute rules