4. History of Pharmacovigilance
1848
The Lancet starts collecting notifications of side effects
after a death caused by anaesthesia
1906
US Federal Food and Drug Act requires that
pharmaceuticals be “pure” and “free of any
contamination”
1937
USA: 107 lethal cases after diethylenglycol was
mistakenly used to solubilize sulphanilamides
1952
France: 100 lethal cases after diethylin diodide was
mistakenly used in a skin preparation
History of Pharmacovigilance
5. • 1959 - 61
Reports of foetal abnormalities in relation with the use
of a new sleep inducing drug thalidomide (biggest
number in Germany)
History of Pharmacovigilance
• 1959 - 61
Reports of foetal abnormalities in relation with the use
of a new sleep inducing drug thalidomide (biggest
number in Germany)
6. Lesson from the Thalidomide
catastrophe
•Not all, drugs good in animals are good
for humans (thalidomide was safe in
pregnant rats …)
•Even very dangerous drugs can be
valuable if safety measures could be
followed
(thalidomide is effective in treatment of leprosy
type II reactions, erythema nodosum leprosum)
7. History of Pharmacovigilance
•1962
USA revised law requiring to prove safety
and efficacy before issuing marketing
authorisation.
•1964
UK starts “yellow cards” system.
•1967
WHO’s International Drug Monitoring
Programme.
8. Introduction:
The world wide consumption of drugs as well as herbal medicines is enormous
So that selecting the adverse drug reactions is becoming important in view of
Safety. Hence pharmacovigilance system is becoming increasingly importance
Given because of growing use of herbal products and herbal medicines.
Since ages Ayurveda , siddha and unani systems are being practised
in India.Now in this era of globalization certain concerns are raised with regular to
their Safety. Ayurveda has catagorised toxic plants separately and for their use
special Processing is essential .There is wide spread misconception that all drugs of
“natural” origin are “safe” there is also a common belief that long term use of
a medicine based on tradition assures both safety and efficacy.
so lets know about pharmacovigilance for the better
Assessment of drug use and safety.
9. Why Pharmacovigilance ?
Adverse Drug reactions are among the top ten causes
of drug mortality.
Lazarou j et al., 1998
Hospitalization attributed to ADRs account for 2.4 &
6.4 % of all hospital admission in the western
world.
Hooft et al., 2008
Drug related morbidity and mortality expenses
exceeded US$ 177.4 billion in USA in 2000
Ernst & Grizzle, 2001
10. Contd…..
• The information collected during the pre-marketing
phase of a drug is inevitably incomplete with regard
to possible adverse reactions.
• Tests in animals are insufficiently predictive
of human safety .
– At the time of approval, clinical trial data are
available on limited numbers of patients
treated for relatively short periods, the
conditions of use differ from those in
clinical practice and the duration of trials is
limited .
11. Contd…
– Information about
• Rare but serious adverse reactions,
– Chronic toxicity,
– Use in special groups (children, the elderly or
pregnant women)
– Drug interactions is often incomplete or not
available.
• Once a product is marketed, large numbers of
patients may be exposed to, including:
– Patients with co-morbid illnesses,
– Patients using concomitant medications,
– Patients with chronic exposure.
12. AIMS OF PHARMACOVIGILANCE
The rational and safe use of drugs
The assessment and communication of the
risks and benefits of drugs in the market
Educating and updating knowledge of
patients.
13. Aims Of Pharmacovigilance
• Early detection of hitherto unknown adverse reactions and
interactions
• Detection of increase in frequency of known adverse
reactions
• Identification of risk factors and possible mechanisms
underlying adverse reactions
• Estimation of quantitative aspects of benefit / risk analysis
and dissemination of information needed to improve
prescription and regulation of drugs.
14. Terms
• Adverse Event (AE) – any untoward medical occurrence that
may present during treatment with a pharmaceutical product but
which does not necessarily have a casual relationship with this
treatment
• Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) – a response to a drug which is
noxious and unintended, and which occurs at doses normally
used in man.
• Serious Adverse Event (SAE) – AE that is either life-
threatening, fatal, cause of prolong hospital admission, cause
persistent disability or concern misuse or dependence
15. Contd…
• Serious Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) – ADR
where SAE conditions of severity applies
• Unexpected Adverse Drug Reaction (UADR) –
an adverse reaction, the nature or severity of
which is not consistent with market
authorization, or expected from the
characteristics of the drug.
16. Contd…..
• Signal – reported information on a possible
relationship between an adverse event and a drug,
unknown or incompletely documented previously.
Usually more than a single report is required to
generate a signal, depending upon the seriousness
of the event and the quality of the information
17. Expected and Unexpected Events
• Expected are those adverse events that were
observed during clinical trials or post-approval
observations and are mentioned in Summary of
Product Characteristics (SPC)
• An adverse reaction,the nature or severity of
which is not consistent with domestic labelling or
market authorization,or expected from
characteristics of the drug.
18. Types of Adverse Reactions (Rawlins
and Thompson Classification)
• Type A Effects (“Augmented”)
• Due to pharmacological effects
• A dose related – may often be avoided by using doses
which are appropriate to the individual patient
• A common, can be experimentally reproduced,
known before marketing
• Example: hypnotic effect after H2 antihistaminics
19. Types of Adverse Reactions (Rawlins and
Thompson Classification)
• Type B Effects (“Bizzard”, idiosyncratic reactions)
• Generally rare and unpredictable
• Little or no dose relationship, not related to drug
pharmacodynamics
• Occur in predisposed, intolerant patients – can be
explained by rare genetic polymorphism, allergic
reactions
• Example: Penicilline allergies
20. Types of Adverse Reactions (Rawlins and
Thompson Classification)
Type C Effects (“Continuous”)
• Adverse reactions after long term therapy
• There is often no suggestive time relationship
and the connection may be very difficult to
prove. The use of a drug increases the
frequency of “spontaneous” disease
• Example: carcinogenesis
21. Types of Adverse Reactions (Rawlins and
Thompson Classification)
Type D Effects (“Delayed”)
• Adverse effect may be presented years after a
drug was used
• Example: Vagina cancer of daughters when
their mother was treated by diethylstilbestrol
Type E Effects (“Ending”)
• Absence of drug after withdrawal – rebound
effect
• Example: corticosteroids in asthma treatment
22. Classification of Adverse Events
based on its severity
• Mild – no changes in therapy are needed
• Moderate – change of therapy is desired but
the events are not life-threatening or causing
disability
• Serious – is either life-threatening, fatal, cause
of prolong hospital admission, cause
persistent disability
23. Classification of Adverse Events
Adverse events can be roughly classified on base of its
underlying mechanism, although this classification is not
unambiguous and there are disputable cases to which
category an event can be attributed
• Intolerance – lower then usual dose produce anticipated
response
• Idiosyncratic (“unusual”) response – determined by genetic
alteration, producing response that is not anticipated
• Allergy – response modulated by immune system
• Pseudoallergy – reaction similar to allergy but not mediated
by immune system
24. What to Report – WHO recommendations
• Every single problem related to the use of a drug,
because probably nobody else is collecting such
information
• All suspected adverse reactions
• ADRs associated with radiology contrast media, vaccines,
diagnostics, drugs used in traditional medicine, herbal
remedies, cosmetics, medical devices and equipment
• Lack of efficacy and suspected pharmaceutical defects
• Counterfeit pharmaceuticals
• Development of resistance
25. Contd…
All adverse reactions suspected to have been
caused by ASU drugs alone or along with any
other drugs.
All suspected drug interactions.
Reactions to any other drugs which are suspected of
significantly affecting a patient's management,
including reactions suspected of causing.
• Death
• Life – threatening (real risk of dying)
• Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)
• Disability (significant, persistent or
permanent)
• Congenital anomaly
• Required intervention to prevent
permanent impairment or damage
26. Who Should Report Safety Data
• Physicians
• Pharmacists
• Pharmaceutical companies qualified persons –
(Pharmacovigilence/Regulatory manager)
• Investigational products (clinical trials)
– Post-approval reporting – Individual Case Safety
Report (ICSR), Periodic Safety Update Report
(PSUR)
• In many countries patients are encouraged (but not
obligated) to report side effects
27. WHAT HAPPENS TO THE
INFORMATION SUBMITTED ?
• The information in the form shall be handled in confidentiality.
Peripheral Pharmacovigilance Centres shall forward the form to
the respective Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres who will
carry out the causality analysis. This information shall be
forwarded to the National Pharmacovigilance Resource Centre.
The data will be statistically analysed and forwarded to the
Dept. of AYUSH, Govt. of India
28. Information Flow
Peripheral Centre (Collection)
Regional Centre (Causality Analysis)
Zonal Centre (Statistical Analysis)
National Centre (Advisory Committee on review of data
may suggest regulatory intervention)
WHO Uppsala Monitoring Centre
29. Reporting Form
• The patient: age, sex and brief medical
history.
• Adverse event: description, results of
investigations and tests, start date, course
and outcome
• Suspected Drugs: name, dose, route,
start/stop dates, indication for use, batch
number
30. Reporting Form
• All other drugs (including self medication):
names, dose, routes, start/stop dates.
• Risk factors: impaired renal function, previous
exposure to suspected drug, previous
allergies. Social drug use.
• Name and address of reporter
31. Withdrawn Drugs (in the US, since 2000)
Drug Year Reason
Lumiracoxib 2008 Hepatotoxicity
Aprotinin 2008 Kidney and cardiovascular toxicity
Tegaserod 2007 Cardiovascular ischemic events
Ximelagatran 2006 Hepatotoxicity
Valdecoxib 2005 Dermatology adverse events
Pemoline 2005 Hepatotoxicity
Rofecoxib 2004 Thrombotic cardiovascular events
Levomethadyl 2003 Fatal Arrhytmia
Rapacuronium 2001 Risk of fatal bronchospasm
Cerivastatin 2001 Rhabdomyolosis
Trovafloxacin 2001 Hepatotoxicity
Amineptine 2000 Hepatotoxicity, dermatological side effects, abuse potential
Cisapride 2000 Cardiac arrhythmias
Troglitazone 2000 Hepatotoxicity
• Other drugs were restricted in use to exclude some patient populations or
indications - Alosetron
• Some drugs were withdrawned and reintroduced after further studies or
special safety measures – Natalizumab withdrawn in 2005 and reintroduced
in 2006
32. Importance of pharmacovigilance
• Complete safety data (especially for unexpected and
serious adverse events) can only be captured through
pharmacovigilance
• It cannot be captured through clinical trials which are
conducted in an “artificial environment.”
– In clinical trials
• patients are not taking any other medications
• do not have concomitant diseases
• are taking the drug short-term (during the duration of the trials only) and
• are not part of vulnerable groups (e.g., children, pregnant women, elderly,
etc.)
33. Importance of pharmacovigilance
Cannot extrapolate data from developed countries:
• Type of drug use is different
– Do not use the co-formulated ARVs
– Minimally use anti-TB, anti-malarial and anti-diarrhoeal drugs
• Patient genotype, phenotype, social and economic conditions
are markedly distinct
– Large number of malnourished patients
– Patients with concomitant diseases
– High rates of illiteracy and poverty, increases likelihood of
inappropriate use by pregnant women, breast feeding mothers, young
children, elderly
– Large number of patients using herbal and other traditional medicines
34. Importance of pharmacovigilance
We are accelerating the use of new drugs in new environments, which
are mostly devoid of pharmacovigilance activities
• Faster scale up of public health programs due to
availability of new funding from major donors such
as the Global Fund, World Bank, PEPFAR, PMI, etc
• New drugs are reaching developing countries in
greater numbers and more quickly because of new
funding from several donors, including the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation
36. What is Pharmacovigilance ?
All drugs are dangerous, some
may also be use full.
N Moore, BMJ,2005,330, 539-40
C. S., Su.- 1:124
44. Objective of Ayurveda
Preservation, Promotion & Maintenance of
Health.
Treatment of Diseases.
It specifies that, Ayurveda deals with the
Health Promotive, Preventive, & Curative
aspects of life in a most comprehensive
way.
45. To Fulfill These Objectives:
Ancient seers tried innumerable
laudable measures
• Ayurveda uses drugs of different sources;
Herbal, Animal, Mineral / Metal, Marine etc. after
a certain modifications
• The long history of their usage for different
therapeutic purposes is the ultimate proof for
their Safe, Efficacious, Non – Toxic & beneficial
effects.
46. Mile Stones for the National
Pharmacovigilance Programme for ASU
Drugs:
The e-version of the ADR reporting format
“AVTAR”, Coimbatore,
will be available on the official websites of
AYUSH, IPGT & RA &
all other National Institutes of AYUSH.
47. Tuberous root of Pueraria tuberosa DC Tuberous root of Ipomea digitata
Linn.
Development of gynacomastasia with deep pigmentation of areola in a
patient treated with Pruraria tuberosa DC
Adverse effects
Gynecomastia (66.7% in GR.I and 16.7% in GRIII patients)
erectile difficulties and loss of desire in 100% patients were
reported
Acharya RN,(2004) Clinico-Pharmacognostical Standardization of
Vidari, Souvenir, International seminar on Plant based medicines,25-27 ,
Oct., 2004, Org. by National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur, India.
48. VIDARI
• Development of gynecomastia can be either
due to high estrogen levels, in hepatotoxic
conditions, renal failure etc (Harold, 1980).
• Here in the present series LFT value
indicates the non hepatotoxic effect and at
some time high estrogenic effect , which is
also confirmatory with earlier reports.
(Shukla S, 1993)
49. Drug Interactions of Guggul
With Hypolipidemic drugs:
Potentiates
• Cholesterol - and triglyceride-lowering effects
• Lowers the dose or eliminates need
• Reduces likelihood of side-effects.
*Satyavati GV, et al. Experimental studies on the hypocholesterolemic effect of
commiphora mukul. Indian J Med Res 1969;57(10):1950-62.
*Nityanand S, et al. Clinical trials with gugulipid. A new hypolipidaemic agent. J Assoc
Physicians India 1989;37(5):323-8.
*Satyavati GV, et al. Guggulipid: a promising hypolipidemic agent from gum guggul
(commiphora wightii). Econ Med Plant Res 1991;5:48-82.
50. Guggul + Anticoagulant Drugs:
Aspirin; warfarin; coumadin; or plavix
Potentiates
The effects of Prothrombin time.
51. GUGGULU With Thyroid medications:
Stimulates the thyroid gland
May alter the dosing requirement
of thyroid medications
*Tripathi YB, et al. Thyroid stimulatory action of (Z)-
guggulsterone: mechanism of action. Planta Med
1988;54(4):271-7.
*Panda S, Kar A. Guggulu (commiphora mukul) induces
triiodothyronine production: possible involvement of lipid
peroxidation. Life Sci 1999;65(12):PL137-41.
52. Reduction:
Gum Guggul may reduces absorption of
PROPANOLOL
Calcium channel blockers (e.g. diltiazem)
if taken concurrently.
*Dalvi SS, et al. Effects of gugulipid on bioavailability of
diltiazem and propranolol. J Assoc Physicians India
1994;42(6):454-5.
54. Centers For ADR Monitoring
1-AIIMS, New Delhi.
2-WHO special center at Mumbai (KEM).
3-JLN Hospital, Aligarh Muslim
University, Aligarh.
These centers were to report ADRs to the
Drug Regulatory Authority of India.
55. NATIONAL PHARMACOVIGILANCE
PROGRAMME OF INDIA
• Drugs Controller General of India (DCG - I)
&
Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO)
initiative in 2005
• National Pharmacovigilance Advisory Board
• National Pharmacovigilance Centre, CDSCO
• Zonal, Regional & Peripheral Pharmacovigilance Centers across
different parts of the country
56. Considering the significance of the problem,
IPGT & RA, Jamnagar, Gujarat, took active initiation.
1st
Workshop during December 2007 at IPGT &
RA, Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar
under the sponsorship of WHO Country Office,
India
In the closing Ceremony-
Shri S.K. Chaddha
Ex. Director, AYUSH,
Announced IPGT & RA as a
National PV Centre
PHARMACOVIGILANCE PROGRAMME
FOR ‘ASU’ DRUGS
57. Consultative Committee Meeting
at AYUSH, New Delhi, 29th
& 30th
of August 08
under the sponsorship of WHO, India Office
PROTOCOL HAS BEEN FINALIZED
59. Finally,
Dept. of AYUSH declared
Institute
For
Post Graduate Teaching
& Research in Ayurveda, Jamnagar
(I.P.G.T.&R.A.)
As
A National Pharmacovigilance Resource Centre
(NPRC) For ‘ASU’ Drugs.
60. DURING THE FIRST PHASE
• Eight : RPCs
(Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre)
&
• Thirty: PPCs
(Peripheral Pharmacovigilance Centre)
Which are the nodal agencies for implementing this
programme.
61. • Administrative heads of National Institutes
• Regulatory authorities
• Technical persons
shall have responsibility of monitoring and
regulating administrative and financial aspects
related to the programme.
National Pharmacovigilance
Consultative Committee
62. DISCUSSION
Ayurvedic drugs are safe due to their natural origin is a
popular conception , but it is true to an extent that many
are used as food and deserves the classification.
Generally recognized as safe GRAS. References in
ayurvedic classics is possible adverse reactions to certain
ayurvedic medicines alert us accepting this concept as
universal, however. This is particularly true if medicines
are not prepared properly, or preconditions for their
administration are not respected by both doctor and
patient which will increase the possibility of an ADR
occuring. Charaka Sutra Sthana 26 warns that
substances contrary to deha dhatus will be antagonistic
(virodha) towards them. Such antagonism may from
properties, combination, processing,place, time , dose,etc
or natural compositions.
63. In Ayurveda diet is as important as medicine. The texts
states that an ailment can be cured by following proper
diet. In this context Charaka lists dietary
incompatibilities between particular food stuffs.
o Fish and milk
o Honey and ghee in equal quanties.
o Hot water after taking bhallataka.
o Kampillaka cooked with buttermilk.
64. CONCLUSION:
On the basis of the above, we conclude that there is a
need for a post marketing surveillance program to
observe quality, safety and efficacy of ayurvedic
drugs , which is now available in the form of National
Pharmacovigilence programme for ASU drugs.
The success of pharmacovigilence lies in its ability to
prevent the adverse reactions on the basis of
information received. This will be possible only when
the physicians are vitally allert ot the onset or offset
of any ADRs. They need to prioritize their
contributions to make the pharmacovigilence
program for ayurvedic medicines a success.
65. You can reduce the suffering and
save thousands of patient’s lives by
doing one thing:
Report suspected adverse
drug reactions.