Pharmacovigilance (Europe)
    Resource Calculator Overview
     Life Sciences Consulting




                                   Confidential
Timothy Roe, AVP                   Client
860-829-6699



                                                  -1-
Contents


•   About Us
•   Objective Of the Tool
•   About the Project
•   Collection Methods & Analytical Tools
•   The Subtleties Between EMEA Offices
•   Building The Calculator
•   Using the Calculator
•   Support Assets




                                            -2-
Confidential Co. Core PV Specialties
Long Global History With JnJ & Janssen
                                         Site Optimization
  Social Network AE
   Monitoring and                                            Resource Planning
      Reporting




Integrated Alliance                                               Process
Management (iAM)                                                Automation

                                          BPO Capabilities

                                                                             -3-
Typical Pharmacovigilance Process

                                                                         Review
                                                                        Commercia
                                                                         l Status
                                                             Amended
                 Spontaneous
Social                                                        Rx Info
                 Reports
Networks &                                                                     Licensing
Literature                                                                     Partners
                                                      Submissio
Reports                                                  n

Clinical                                    Data
Trial Data                                 Review


    Product
    Complaints
    & LOE        Licensing                                 Inquiry           Worldwide
                 Partners &                               Respons            Regulatory
                                            Signal
                 Alliances                                    e               Reports
                                           Detectio
                                              n

      INTAKE                    COLLATE
         &                         &
    COLLECTION                 TRANSLAT   ANALYZE          COMMUNICATE
                                   E

                                                                                    -4-
Objective Of The Tool




To help Drug Safety and Surveillance executives
   plan and manage optimized staffing levels
 especially during surge events and other crisis
                   situations.




                                                   -5-
About The Project




                    -6-
Client Enablers

     1                 2                   3                4                 5

Provide client    Enable client
    with an       to accurately      Client has the    Client has the
  analysis of     predict surge     ability to print      ability to        Provide
 their current    staffing levels       colorized       utilize rapid     knowledge
processes, and   at a budgeted,        reports for        “Rule of       transfer and
  a modeling       utilized and        immediate          Thumb”        transparency
    tool for        optimized        insertion into     calculations    of solution to
“What-If” and    level as well as   executive-level    outside of the     the client.
     “2B”         the change in     presentations.          tool.
  scenarios.      FTE required.




                                                                                         -7-
Challenges

         Overcoming the natural protective barriers put forth by
         internal staff whenever efficiency projects are commenced

         Gaining a firm understanding of the EMEA business model
         and various process flows

         Documenting comprehensive multi-tier (and inter-related)
         paper-based workflow processes

         Coding the calculator based on client input and diverse
         business environments


         Slight language barriers were easily overcome


                                                                     -8-
Typical Top-Line Solution Steps

1.   Provide initial data collection tools including forms and templates
2.   Perform staff interviews, time studies and volume assessments
3.   Document start to end case process flow pre-optimization
4.   Perform identification, organization and documentation of the SIPOC
     (Sources, Inputs, Processes, Outputs and Customers)
5.  Analyze activities, data and document findings
6.  Organize data into work streams and determine direct vs. indirect time
    for any FTE processing cases
7. Build the Resource Calculator
8. Test and confirm output. Run against the simulation tool to “tune” the
    calculator
9. Provide “Rule of Thumb” and polynomial prediction formula’s for rapid
    Volume/FTE calculation without tool
10. Perform walkthrough of the simulator results and operation of the
    calculator with client staff

                                                                             -9-
Collection Methods & Analytical Tools




                                        - 10 -
Typical Assessment Schedule




                              - 11 -
Documents Inventory




                      - 12 -
Collected Workflows
With Workshop Modifications




                              - 13 -
Creation Of An Employee/Position Matrix
For Budgeted And Utilized FTE Calculations




                                             Graphical Distribution




                                                                      - 14 -
SIPOC
Details Collected, Verified And Confirmed




                                            - 15 -
Client Confirmation Sheets
For Consolidated Activities




                              - 16 -
The Subtleties Between EMEA Offices Studied




                                              - 17 -
Analysis of Individual Office
Processing Activities Steps




                                - 18 -
Analysis Of Indirect Time Differences

Process Indirect Work
• 12 Unique Categories
    –    Serbia 8
    –    NEWAAT 2
    –    Germany 1
    –    Ukraine 1
    –    Time Range 0.1 hr to 4.0 hrs.                      PV Agreements And Inefficient Office Setup Accounted For The Largest Indirect Time


• Consistent Categories                    Value Ranges
   Audit                         N, S
                                              Time Range
   Compliance Check              N, S, U
                                              Low 0.05 hr   Serbia - SPC Checks
   Inefficient Office Setup      N, S
                                              High 8.0 hr   Serbia - PV Agreements
   Literature Search & Reviews   S, U
   Other Projects                N, S, U
                                              Next Top 3
   PV Agreements                 N, S         7.5 hrs       NEWAAT - Other Projects Ad Hoc
   Queries                       N, S         5.0 hrs       NEWAAT - Other Projects NPP, Clin Trials
   Reconciliations               N, S, U      4.0 hrs       NEWAAT - Inefficient Office
   Reporting - Other             N, S, U      4.0 hrs       NEWAAT - PV Agreements
   SOP Review & Management       G, N, S


    Note: Hours per Week




                                                                                                                                      - 19 -
Analysis Of Indirect Time Differences

People-Related Indirect Work
• 100% Same Categories
• Consistent Categories             Value Ranges
  Meetings                G, N, S
                                          Time Range
  Recruiting - HR         G, S
                                          Low 0.2 hr               Germany – HR-Related
  Training - Self         S, U
                                          High 3.5 hr              NEWAAT Training Self
  Training - Others       S, U
  Training - Both         G, N
                                          Next Top 2
                                          3.0 hrs                  NEWAAT - Meetings
                                          1.5 hrs                  Ukraine – Training Both




                                    Although all offices had training for self & others, Germany and NEWAAT combined them.

                                               Only Germany and Serbia engage in HR - Recruiting type activities.




   Note: Hours per Week




                                                                                                                             - 20 -
Analysis Of Indirect Time Differences

Technology Indirect Work
• 100% Same Categories
• Consistent Categories                                           Value Ranges
  Non-IT Related                               S, U
                                                                    Time Range
  IT-Related                                   G, N, S, U
                                                                    Low 0.1 hr    Germany – Technology Breakdown
                                                                    High 1.0 hr   Serbia – Non-IT Issues (Fax/Printer Difficulties)


                                                                    Next Top 3
                                                                    0.7 hrs       NEWAAT – SRS System Delays & Breakdowns
                                                                    0.5 hrs       Ukraine – Non-IT Fax
                                                                    0.5 hrs       Serbia – IT Issues


      All offices experience Technology Issues. Only Serbia and
               Ukraine listed Non-IT issues as significant.




   Note: Hours per Week




                                                                                                                                      - 21 -
Building The Calculator




                          - 22 -
Key Baseline Information From Offices

5 Attributes Collected And Culled




                                         Core Formula:

                                         DWt = 1-(IDt + OoOt )




                                                                 - 23 -
Determination Of Engine Production
And Calculator Workflow




                                     - 24 -
Output Area Of The Tool



  Budgeted FTE           Utilized FTE       Optimized FTE         Required FTE            ∆ in FTE

• Actual "real and    • Budgeted FTE       • Takes the          • Reflects the FTE   • Number of FTE
  current" FTE          with average         utilized FTE and     needed to            that should be
  based on your         standard             optimizes it         process the          increased (+) or
  office's standard     additional hours     based on work        entered volume       decreased (-)
  workweek and          (OT) worked.         distribution and     with zero idle       over
  work hours per                             max efficiency       time or Max          comparator.
  day.                                       (87.5%) in           Capacity.
                                             current
                                             operating
                                             environment.




                                                                                                          - 25 -
Screen Shot Of Calculator Main Screen




Single View Example




                                          EMEA Multi-View Capability




                                                                  - 26 -
Simulator Tuning Tool




                        - 27 -
Using The Calculator




                       - 28 -
Resource Calculator Overview
                                                 Tabbed Sections
                                                      The Resource Calculator Main Page
                                                      Consists Of Several Sections
                                                      •   Monthly Volume Input Section With
                                                          Default Values
                                                      •   Budgeted FTE Input Section With Default
                                                          Values
                                                      •   Daily Case Volume Processed By FTE Input
                                                          Sections
                                                      •   Output Comparison Table
                                                      •   Output Graphic “At-A-Glance” Indicators

                                                      Each Section Contains “At-A-Glance”
                                                      Indicators
                                                      •   Color-coded Entry Points Match Graphical
                                                          Indicators On The Dashboard
                                                      •   Percentage Breakouts
                                                      •   Volume And Status Indicators
                                                      •   Additional Section Calculations
                                                      •   Percent Change Calculations

                                                      Other Contents
                                                      •   Benchmark Comparative Values
                                                      •   Rules Of Thumb For Predictive “On-The-Fly”
                                                          Calculations Using either the linear formula or
                                                          Dead Reckoning with the graph
                                                      •   Output Definitions
      Office Selector – For Ease of Navigation


                                                                                                        - 29 -
Printing Reports




       Color Version   B&W Version


                                     - 30 -
Support Assets


                     HD 1080p Widescreen




                      Live Video Overview
                       http://vimeo.com/57635532




      User’s Guide


                                                   - 31 -
Thank you
 Timothy Roe
 AVP – Life Sciences Consulting
 860-829-6699



                                  - 32 -

Pharmacovigilance Surge Resource Calculator

  • 1.
    Pharmacovigilance (Europe) Resource Calculator Overview Life Sciences Consulting Confidential Timothy Roe, AVP Client 860-829-6699 -1-
  • 2.
    Contents • About Us • Objective Of the Tool • About the Project • Collection Methods & Analytical Tools • The Subtleties Between EMEA Offices • Building The Calculator • Using the Calculator • Support Assets -2-
  • 3.
    Confidential Co. CorePV Specialties Long Global History With JnJ & Janssen Site Optimization Social Network AE Monitoring and Resource Planning Reporting Integrated Alliance Process Management (iAM) Automation BPO Capabilities -3-
  • 4.
    Typical Pharmacovigilance Process Review Commercia l Status Amended Spontaneous Social Rx Info Reports Networks & Licensing Literature Partners Submissio Reports n Clinical Data Trial Data Review Product Complaints & LOE Licensing Inquiry Worldwide Partners & Respons Regulatory Signal Alliances e Reports Detectio n INTAKE COLLATE & & COLLECTION TRANSLAT ANALYZE COMMUNICATE E -4-
  • 5.
    Objective Of TheTool To help Drug Safety and Surveillance executives plan and manage optimized staffing levels especially during surge events and other crisis situations. -5-
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Client Enablers 1 2 3 4 5 Provide client Enable client with an to accurately Client has the Client has the analysis of predict surge ability to print ability to Provide their current staffing levels colorized utilize rapid knowledge processes, and at a budgeted, reports for “Rule of transfer and a modeling utilized and immediate Thumb” transparency tool for optimized insertion into calculations of solution to “What-If” and level as well as executive-level outside of the the client. “2B” the change in presentations. tool. scenarios. FTE required. -7-
  • 8.
    Challenges Overcoming the natural protective barriers put forth by internal staff whenever efficiency projects are commenced Gaining a firm understanding of the EMEA business model and various process flows Documenting comprehensive multi-tier (and inter-related) paper-based workflow processes Coding the calculator based on client input and diverse business environments Slight language barriers were easily overcome -8-
  • 9.
    Typical Top-Line SolutionSteps 1. Provide initial data collection tools including forms and templates 2. Perform staff interviews, time studies and volume assessments 3. Document start to end case process flow pre-optimization 4. Perform identification, organization and documentation of the SIPOC (Sources, Inputs, Processes, Outputs and Customers) 5. Analyze activities, data and document findings 6. Organize data into work streams and determine direct vs. indirect time for any FTE processing cases 7. Build the Resource Calculator 8. Test and confirm output. Run against the simulation tool to “tune” the calculator 9. Provide “Rule of Thumb” and polynomial prediction formula’s for rapid Volume/FTE calculation without tool 10. Perform walkthrough of the simulator results and operation of the calculator with client staff -9-
  • 10.
    Collection Methods &Analytical Tools - 10 -
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Creation Of AnEmployee/Position Matrix For Budgeted And Utilized FTE Calculations Graphical Distribution - 14 -
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Client Confirmation Sheets ForConsolidated Activities - 16 -
  • 17.
    The Subtleties BetweenEMEA Offices Studied - 17 -
  • 18.
    Analysis of IndividualOffice Processing Activities Steps - 18 -
  • 19.
    Analysis Of IndirectTime Differences Process Indirect Work • 12 Unique Categories – Serbia 8 – NEWAAT 2 – Germany 1 – Ukraine 1 – Time Range 0.1 hr to 4.0 hrs. PV Agreements And Inefficient Office Setup Accounted For The Largest Indirect Time • Consistent Categories Value Ranges Audit N, S Time Range Compliance Check N, S, U Low 0.05 hr Serbia - SPC Checks Inefficient Office Setup N, S High 8.0 hr Serbia - PV Agreements Literature Search & Reviews S, U Other Projects N, S, U Next Top 3 PV Agreements N, S 7.5 hrs NEWAAT - Other Projects Ad Hoc Queries N, S 5.0 hrs NEWAAT - Other Projects NPP, Clin Trials Reconciliations N, S, U 4.0 hrs NEWAAT - Inefficient Office Reporting - Other N, S, U 4.0 hrs NEWAAT - PV Agreements SOP Review & Management G, N, S Note: Hours per Week - 19 -
  • 20.
    Analysis Of IndirectTime Differences People-Related Indirect Work • 100% Same Categories • Consistent Categories Value Ranges Meetings G, N, S Time Range Recruiting - HR G, S Low 0.2 hr Germany – HR-Related Training - Self S, U High 3.5 hr NEWAAT Training Self Training - Others S, U Training - Both G, N Next Top 2 3.0 hrs NEWAAT - Meetings 1.5 hrs Ukraine – Training Both Although all offices had training for self & others, Germany and NEWAAT combined them. Only Germany and Serbia engage in HR - Recruiting type activities. Note: Hours per Week - 20 -
  • 21.
    Analysis Of IndirectTime Differences Technology Indirect Work • 100% Same Categories • Consistent Categories Value Ranges Non-IT Related S, U Time Range IT-Related G, N, S, U Low 0.1 hr Germany – Technology Breakdown High 1.0 hr Serbia – Non-IT Issues (Fax/Printer Difficulties) Next Top 3 0.7 hrs NEWAAT – SRS System Delays & Breakdowns 0.5 hrs Ukraine – Non-IT Fax 0.5 hrs Serbia – IT Issues All offices experience Technology Issues. Only Serbia and Ukraine listed Non-IT issues as significant. Note: Hours per Week - 21 -
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Key Baseline InformationFrom Offices 5 Attributes Collected And Culled Core Formula: DWt = 1-(IDt + OoOt ) - 23 -
  • 24.
    Determination Of EngineProduction And Calculator Workflow - 24 -
  • 25.
    Output Area OfThe Tool Budgeted FTE Utilized FTE Optimized FTE Required FTE ∆ in FTE • Actual "real and • Budgeted FTE • Takes the • Reflects the FTE • Number of FTE current" FTE with average utilized FTE and needed to that should be based on your standard optimizes it process the increased (+) or office's standard additional hours based on work entered volume decreased (-) workweek and (OT) worked. distribution and with zero idle over work hours per max efficiency time or Max comparator. day. (87.5%) in Capacity. current operating environment. - 25 -
  • 26.
    Screen Shot OfCalculator Main Screen Single View Example EMEA Multi-View Capability - 26 -
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Resource Calculator Overview Tabbed Sections The Resource Calculator Main Page Consists Of Several Sections • Monthly Volume Input Section With Default Values • Budgeted FTE Input Section With Default Values • Daily Case Volume Processed By FTE Input Sections • Output Comparison Table • Output Graphic “At-A-Glance” Indicators Each Section Contains “At-A-Glance” Indicators • Color-coded Entry Points Match Graphical Indicators On The Dashboard • Percentage Breakouts • Volume And Status Indicators • Additional Section Calculations • Percent Change Calculations Other Contents • Benchmark Comparative Values • Rules Of Thumb For Predictive “On-The-Fly” Calculations Using either the linear formula or Dead Reckoning with the graph • Output Definitions Office Selector – For Ease of Navigation - 29 -
  • 30.
    Printing Reports Color Version B&W Version - 30 -
  • 31.
    Support Assets HD 1080p Widescreen Live Video Overview http://vimeo.com/57635532 User’s Guide - 31 -
  • 32.
    Thank you TimothyRoe AVP – Life Sciences Consulting 860-829-6699 - 32 -