Pre Mortem Retrospectives
Download as PPT, PDF20 likes6,567 views
The document outlines the concept of pre-mortem retrospectives, which aim to identify potential failures before they occur, allowing teams to adapt and make changes proactively. It describes the structure of a premortem meeting, detailing steps such as gathering information, generating insights, and deciding on actions to take based on the team’s reflections. The process encourages team engagement and focuses on both successes and challenges to improve future project outcomes.
![Gaetano Mazzanti Gama-Tech @mgaewsj [email_address]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/premortem5pc-110828125621-phpapp01/85/Pre-Mortem-Retrospectives-18-320.jpg)
Pre Mortem Retrospectives
- 1. Pre-Mortem Retrospectives G.Mazzanti @mgaewsj
- 2. catch ‘failure’ before it occurs circumvent any need for a painful postmortem “ You’ve seen your own future, which means you can change it if you want to.” Chief John Anderton, Minority Report
- 3. + ( ) Gary Klein, “ Performing a Project Premortem”, 2007, HBR
- 4. agile retrospective a special meeting held throughout a project where a team inspect and review events, methods and teamwork and immediately learn and adapt
- 5. agile retrospective a special meeting held throughout a project where a team inspect and review events, methods and teamwork and immediately learn and adapt premortem before prevent anticipate p
- 6. Retrospective Structure Set the Stage Gather Info Generate Insights Decide Actions Close
- 7. time-travel to a date after the scheduled release date assume that the project has failed miserably welcome state purpose everybody speaks outline approach 5’
- 8. team identify key events & feelings good , bad and neutral (but relevant) who what when facts feelings 10’ mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct
- 9. team identify key events good , bad and neutral (but relevant) 10’
- 10. what didn’t work what worked well why causes & effects then each person writes 4 * sticky notes (2 for what worked well and 2 for what didn’t work ) *choose what suit best 25’
- 11. silent grouping items are grouped silently by the team each group is then given a name one or two groups are selected for action 25’
- 12. generate quick ideas what 25’
- 13. how who & when pick 2 or 3 actions (dot vote), elaborate two dots per person top priority second choice 15’ 15’
- 14. pick 2 or 3 actions (dot vote) two dots per person top priority second choice 15’ 15’
- 15. put actions on a task board, be sure there is commitment and energy to achieve goals to do in progress done 15’ 15’
- 16. ROTI Return On Time Invested Take Visual Records Plan for Follow-Up Appreciation for everyone 5’
- 17. time-travel to a date after the scheduled release date assume that the project has been a huge success variant see also Tim Mackinnon http://www.planningcards.com/iterex/papers/Futurespectives.pdf
- 18. Gaetano Mazzanti Gama-Tech @mgaewsj [email_address]