Project Evaluation
What Is project evaluation?
Project evaluation refers to the systematic investigation of an object's worth or
merit. The methodology is applied in projects, programs and policies.
Evaluation
Means collecting,analysing and sharing information
about your project.
Purpose
Of project evaluation.
The purposes of project evaluation are to
improve the quality of services, to ensure
value for money, and to prioritise proposed
capital projects.
Which
Projects should be evaluated?
All capital projects, including fixed capital
expenditure, plant and equipment, and capital grants
and subsidies, should be subject to evaluation,
commensurate with the level of investment, to
provide the necessary information to decision-
makers.
Cost
&
Timing
Major purpose of project evaluation is to
improve value for money, the cost of project
evaluation must be balanced against the benefits
of improved decision making.
Key clients and stakeholders (e.g. departmental
management, Treasury) should be consulted on a
periodic basis to ensure the evaluations are
relevant to client needs and to avoid unnecessary
costs and delays.
Project evaluations for major capital
projects, to be funded from a department’s
capital base and to commence in the next
financial year, should be completed by the
start of the annual Budget process. The
evaluations should be completed
sufficiently in advance of the Budget
process to allow the necessary time for
review. This applies especially where there
are contentious issues.
Social
analysis
An analysis of the social impacts of a
capital project provides information,
such as distributional effects, which
are not included in an economic
analysis but may be needed for
decision-makers in assessing the
desirability of projects.
● result in significant distributional shifts in costs and
benefits between and within communities;
substantially affect employment, trade, private sector
or other levels of government etc;
cause disproportionate disadvantage to a particular
sector;
provoke appreciable community concern;
require changes in government policy and direction.
Environmental
analysis
The environmental analysis may
include a preliminary review to
determine the extent and nature of the
environmental issues and whether
further investigation is needed,
followed by a detailed environmental
impact statement commensurate with
the significance of the environmental
issues and the project.
Check
The progress of your report.
Collect
Information for final report.
Question
Arises
How
Can i evaluate my project?
Review the
goals
❏What is the problem i am trying to
solve?
What is needed for change to
happen?
What do i plan to make change
happen?
What results i expect my project to
reach?
How can i evaluate the progress?
CollectInformation
What type of
information i need to
collect?
Informati
on you
already
have.
Informati
on you
need to
collect.
Total
evidence
Information
You already have.
●
Project proposal
Program of the project
Abstracts of activities
List of participants
Administrative documents
Fund documents
You need to collect
INFORMATION
Quantitative information
Number of activities
Number of participants
Number of resources used
Number of meetings held
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROJECT EVALUATION
AND MONITORING.
Post-project
evaluation
INTRODUCTION
IMPORTANCE
Continuous improvement
mechanism
Succeeding projects would
be made less stressful
Clears any
misunderstandings or issues
Advancement of future
PARTICIPANTS
INVOLVED
FACILITATOR
Make the required arrangements for the
meeting
Orients the participants about their duties
Reviews any material submitted before
the meeting
Establishes the guidelines for judgement
Help members of the group to
maintain effective working relationship
Jot down points of the entire session
Distributes project report to the team
members and to those who are
HOW TO RUN A POST
PROJECT MEETING
Gather data
# Project results
# Schedule performance
# Resource expenditures
# Problems that arose during the project
# Changes during the project in objectives, schedules, and
budgets
# Unanticipated occurrences or changes in the environment
during the project
# Customers’ satisfaction with the project results
# Management’s satisfaction with the project results
ISSUES TO ADDRESS
# Did you accomplish all the project objectives?
# Did you meet the project schedule?
# Did you complete the project within budget?
# With regard to problems during the project
* Could you have anticipated and planned for them in advance? If
so, how?
* Did you handle them effectively and efficiently when they arose?
# Did you use the organization’s project-management
systems and procedures effectively?
TO GET A
CONSTRUCTIVE
FEEDBACK
# Invite the right people
# Declare at the beginning of the meeting that
it’s supposed to be a learning experience rather
than a finger-pointing session
# Encourage people to –
* Identify what other people did well
*Examine their own performance and see how they
could’ve handled situations differently
ELEMENTS OF
GOOD REVIEW
Identify items that were effectively done
Identify the areas to be improved
Identify items that were broken : which
requires rethinking and complete repair
Decide action plans : according to the
feedbacks
Maximum participation
Private meetings prior the
meeting ,to ensure proper follow up of
certain ground rules
VOTING : provides complete review
and maximum participation
Praisals on excellent parts
Jot down every single detail
Submit the report to senior
PURPOSE OF
SHARING LESSONS
Avoiding same mistakes
Inclusions of new government
priorities, strategies and initiatives
Contributing to organizational
growth
ILLUSTRATION FOR
A POST PROJRCT
REVIEW
Project evaluation
Project evaluation
Project evaluation
Project evaluation
Project evaluation
Project evaluation
Project evaluation
Project evaluation
Project evaluation

Project evaluation

  • 1.
  • 2.
    What Is projectevaluation?
  • 3.
    Project evaluation refersto the systematic investigation of an object's worth or merit. The methodology is applied in projects, programs and policies.
  • 5.
    Evaluation Means collecting,analysing andsharing information about your project.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    The purposes ofproject evaluation are to improve the quality of services, to ensure value for money, and to prioritise proposed capital projects.
  • 9.
  • 11.
    All capital projects,including fixed capital expenditure, plant and equipment, and capital grants and subsidies, should be subject to evaluation, commensurate with the level of investment, to provide the necessary information to decision- makers.
  • 12.
  • 14.
    Major purpose ofproject evaluation is to improve value for money, the cost of project evaluation must be balanced against the benefits of improved decision making. Key clients and stakeholders (e.g. departmental management, Treasury) should be consulted on a periodic basis to ensure the evaluations are relevant to client needs and to avoid unnecessary costs and delays.
  • 16.
    Project evaluations formajor capital projects, to be funded from a department’s capital base and to commence in the next financial year, should be completed by the start of the annual Budget process. The evaluations should be completed sufficiently in advance of the Budget process to allow the necessary time for review. This applies especially where there are contentious issues.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    An analysis ofthe social impacts of a capital project provides information, such as distributional effects, which are not included in an economic analysis but may be needed for decision-makers in assessing the desirability of projects.
  • 20.
    ● result insignificant distributional shifts in costs and benefits between and within communities; substantially affect employment, trade, private sector or other levels of government etc; cause disproportionate disadvantage to a particular sector; provoke appreciable community concern; require changes in government policy and direction.
  • 21.
  • 22.
    The environmental analysismay include a preliminary review to determine the extent and nature of the environmental issues and whether further investigation is needed, followed by a detailed environmental impact statement commensurate with the significance of the environmental issues and the project.
  • 23.
  • 25.
  • 27.
  • 28.
    How Can i evaluatemy project?
  • 29.
  • 30.
    ❏What is theproblem i am trying to solve? What is needed for change to happen? What do i plan to make change happen? What results i expect my project to reach? How can i evaluate the progress?
  • 31.
  • 33.
    What type of informationi need to collect?
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 37.
    ● Project proposal Program ofthe project Abstracts of activities List of participants Administrative documents Fund documents
  • 38.
    You need tocollect INFORMATION
  • 39.
    Quantitative information Number ofactivities Number of participants Number of resources used Number of meetings held
  • 40.
    DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROJECTEVALUATION AND MONITORING.
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.
  • 45.
    Continuous improvement mechanism Succeeding projectswould be made less stressful Clears any misunderstandings or issues Advancement of future
  • 46.
  • 47.
    FACILITATOR Make the requiredarrangements for the meeting Orients the participants about their duties Reviews any material submitted before the meeting Establishes the guidelines for judgement
  • 48.
    Help members ofthe group to maintain effective working relationship Jot down points of the entire session Distributes project report to the team members and to those who are
  • 49.
    HOW TO RUNA POST PROJECT MEETING
  • 50.
    Gather data # Projectresults # Schedule performance # Resource expenditures # Problems that arose during the project # Changes during the project in objectives, schedules, and budgets # Unanticipated occurrences or changes in the environment during the project # Customers’ satisfaction with the project results # Management’s satisfaction with the project results
  • 51.
    ISSUES TO ADDRESS #Did you accomplish all the project objectives? # Did you meet the project schedule? # Did you complete the project within budget? # With regard to problems during the project * Could you have anticipated and planned for them in advance? If so, how? * Did you handle them effectively and efficiently when they arose? # Did you use the organization’s project-management systems and procedures effectively?
  • 52.
  • 53.
    # Invite theright people # Declare at the beginning of the meeting that it’s supposed to be a learning experience rather than a finger-pointing session # Encourage people to – * Identify what other people did well *Examine their own performance and see how they could’ve handled situations differently
  • 54.
  • 55.
    Identify items thatwere effectively done Identify the areas to be improved Identify items that were broken : which requires rethinking and complete repair Decide action plans : according to the feedbacks Maximum participation
  • 56.
    Private meetings priorthe meeting ,to ensure proper follow up of certain ground rules VOTING : provides complete review and maximum participation Praisals on excellent parts Jot down every single detail Submit the report to senior
  • 57.
  • 58.
    Avoiding same mistakes Inclusionsof new government priorities, strategies and initiatives Contributing to organizational growth
  • 59.