Regulatory Considerations in
Mobile Programs
Presented by Dale Cooke & Geoff McCleary
13 November 2013
Agenda
> Rise & importance of mobile
> FDA mobile apps guidance
> An open question
> Mobile medical device requirements
> Promotional labeling in mobile tactics
> Q&A

2
Rise & importance of mobile

3
Vatican,
2005
Vatican,
2013
Source: KPCB
91% of smartphone owners have
their phone within arm’s length most
of the time. (60% all the time)

7

www.marketingcharts.com/direct/most-smartphone-owners-feel-naked-without-their-devices-21769
8
blog.newrelic.com/wp-content/uploads/mobile_ig_final1.png
of ALL children

under two,
9

are using mobile

http://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/zero-to-eight-childrens-media-use-in-america-2013
Mobile
DRIVES

%

of all internet traffic

10
52% OF SMARTPHONE OWNERS
GATHER HEALTH INFO ON THEIR
MOBILE DEVICE

http://pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_MobileHealth2012.pdf
9 out of 10 would “take” an app if a
physician prescribed it.
Building a study to learn more…
> Survey 2000+ consumers to find out how they use smartphones to
access disease related health information and services now, and
what they want to access in the future.
> We asked patients and caregiver across 20 diseases in 5 categories
•
•
•
•
•

Allergy & Asthma
Cardiologic Conditions
Neurologic Conditions
Diabetes
Gastroenterological Conditions

> Demographic profiles
•

Age, income, marital status, location, etc

> Condition Profiles
•

Disease, impact, treatment type, activity at physician’s office

> mHealth Use
•

use by disease category, device type, location, future needs
STUDY REPORT:
Consumer Use of Smartphones for
Condition Related Health Activities
Prepared by

14
FDA mobile apps guidance

15
What is this thing?
Advertising &
Promotion

16

Medical Devices
FDA is here to help

Released September 2013

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidan
ce/GuidanceDocuments/UCM263366.pdf
See also, http://www.scribd.com/doc/170875173/DH-Regulatory-AlertMobile-App-Guidance-Finalized
17
MMA guidance
Mobile Medical App (MMA) defined as:
“a mobile app that meets the definition of device in
section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act); and either is intended:
• to be used as an accessory to a regulated medical
device; or
• to transform a mobile platform into a regulated
medical device.”

—FDA

18

Guidance for Industry: Mobile Medical Applications, page 7
Digitas Health is also here to help

19
CDRH will focus its regulatory efforts on apps that:
> Are accessories to a regulated medical device
> Transform the mobile device into a medical device
> Perform patient-specific analysis and provide patientspecific treatment recommendations
20
21
22
CDRH will focus its regulatory efforts on apps that:
> Are accessories to a regulated medical device
> Transform the mobile device into a medical device
> Perform patient-specific analysis and provide patientspecific treatment recommendations
23
“Some mobile apps may meet the definition
of a medical device but because they pose
a lower risk to the public, FDA intends to
exercise enforcement discretion over these
devices (meaning it will not enforce
requirements under the FD&C Act)”
—FDA Guidance for Industry: Mobile Medical Applications, page 4

24
Regulatory discretion
FDA is asserting two things:
1. FDA has the legal authority to enforce legal and
regulatory requirements in that area.
2. FDA will not use that authority.

25
Will FDA change its position?

—FDA Mobile Apps Twitter Chat, September 26, 2013
26
•

Help patients (i.e., users) self-manage their disease or conditions
without providing specific treatment or treatment suggestions;

•

Provide patients with simple tools to organize and track their
health information;

•

Provide easy access to information related to patients’ health
conditions or treatments;

•

Help patients document, show, or communicate potential medical
conditions to health care providers;

•

Automate simple tasks for health care providers; or

•

Enable patients or providers to interact with Personal Health
Record (PHR) or Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems.
—FDA Guidance for Industry: Mobile Medical Applications, page 16

27
28
29
30
An open question

31
What about dosing apps?
“apps that use patient-specific parameters and calculate
dosage or create a dosage plan for radiation therapy” ARE
devices where FDA will require presubmission, etc.
—FDA Guidance for Industry: Mobile Medical Applications, page 15

But…
“Mobile apps that perform simple calculations routinely
used in clinical practice” ARE devices where FDA will
NOT require presubmission, etc.
—FDA Guidance for Industry: Mobile Medical Applications, page 17

32
Some will not be subject to enforcement

—FDA Mobile Apps Twitter Chat, September 26, 2013
33
Medical device requirements

34
Meeting medical device requirements
> Medical device manufacturer registration
> Class determination (I, II, or III)
> Validated development environment and/or
quality systems in place
> Investigational Device Exemption filing
requirements
> 510(k) or PMA filing with FDA likely required
> Postmarketing reporting requirements

35
Promotional labeling in mobile
tactics

36
Mobile apps as promotional platforms
Mobile apps can be advertising platforms (e.g., The New York Times
app, Doximity)
When the underlying app discusses health, the same rules apply
> Is it a medical device?
> Does regulatory discretion apply?
> Is your paid placement an advertisement or part of the app’s core
functionality?

37
Promotional labeling requirements
Four Types of Communication

Product Promotion Requirements

> Reminder Ads

> Product Name Usage

> Product Promotions

> Fair Balance

> Disease Awareness
Communications

> Indication Statement

> Redirecting Communications

> Adequate Provision
(Directions for Use)
> MedWatch Statement
> Beware turning your app
into a regulated device via
promotion!

38
But what about mobile promotion?
Unique considerations for mobile promotion
> Device size
> Device variability
> Screen rotation
> Technology changes (Go away, Flash!)
> Screen takeover
> Touch screen interface
> Integration with the rest of the device (GPS, calendar,
reminders, accelerometer, etc.)
39
Questions?
Dale Cooke
Vice President/Group Director, Regulatory Review
Dale.Cooke@DigitasHealth.com
@PhillyCooke on Twitter
www.scribd.com/Dale_Cooke
About the speaker:
Dale Cooke, VP/Group Director, Regulatory
Dale Cooke is the head of the regulatory department for Digitas Health. He
has worked with more than 30 pharmaceutical and medical device clients and
with Medical-Legal-Regulatory committees around the world from offices in
Philadelphia, New York, Boston, San Francisco, and London. Dale advises
clients on FDA enforcement actions and provides recommendations for
compliance with FDA regulations, with a focus on issues involving the Internet
and emerging technology. His insights have been featured in the Wall Street
Journal’s Health blog, The Pink Sheet, MedAdNews, PharmExec, and others.
Dale is an active member of the Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society
(RAPS), Drug Information Association (DIA), and the Food and Drug Law
Institute (FDLI).
Dale is the author of Effective Review and Approval of Digital Promotional
Tactics, which is part of the FDLI primer series. He is regularly invited to speak
at industry conferences on topics including FDA enforcement trends, best
practices for review processes, global review practices, and pharmaceutical
involvement in social media.
Dale earned his B.A. in Philosophy from Southern Methodist University and an
M.A. in Analytical Philosophy from the University of Arizona and studied
Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Drexel University’s School of Public Health.

41
Geoff McCleary
Vice President/Group Director, Mobile Innovations
As group director of mobile innovation at Digitas Health, Geoff is responsible
for all mobile channel strategy and oversight of mobile efforts globally for
Digitas Health work across multiple offices for major pharmaceutical,
healthcare, and biotech clients.
Before joining the company in 2012, Geoff was head of strategy for mobile
healthcare marketing agency Eveo. With responsibility for development of
strategy, research and planning practices for an organization with over 40
healthcare apps in the app store.
Prior to Eveo, Geoff was the VP Strategy for imc2 Health & Wellness,
developing strategic vision and direction for the company’s east coast
pharmaceutical clients. In addition, he was lead for the company’s Mobile
Center of Excellence, providing mobile marketing consulting to major CPG
brands as well as existing healthcare clients.
More than 15 years of pharmaceutical and interactive marketing experience
enables him to provide the most strategic mobile and technological insights
to the world’s largest pharmaceutical clients. As a leading mobile marketing
evangelist, Geoff has established himself as a proponent of using mobile
tools, social media and emerging technologies to creative meaningful
connections with patients, consumers and physicians.

42

Regulatory Considerations in Mobile Programs

  • 1.
    Regulatory Considerations in MobilePrograms Presented by Dale Cooke & Geoff McCleary 13 November 2013
  • 2.
    Agenda > Rise &importance of mobile > FDA mobile apps guidance > An open question > Mobile medical device requirements > Promotional labeling in mobile tactics > Q&A 2
  • 3.
    Rise & importanceof mobile 3
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    91% of smartphoneowners have their phone within arm’s length most of the time. (60% all the time) 7 www.marketingcharts.com/direct/most-smartphone-owners-feel-naked-without-their-devices-21769
  • 8.
  • 9.
    of ALL children undertwo, 9 are using mobile http://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/zero-to-eight-childrens-media-use-in-america-2013
  • 10.
  • 11.
    52% OF SMARTPHONEOWNERS GATHER HEALTH INFO ON THEIR MOBILE DEVICE http://pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_MobileHealth2012.pdf
  • 12.
    9 out of10 would “take” an app if a physician prescribed it.
  • 13.
    Building a studyto learn more… > Survey 2000+ consumers to find out how they use smartphones to access disease related health information and services now, and what they want to access in the future. > We asked patients and caregiver across 20 diseases in 5 categories • • • • • Allergy & Asthma Cardiologic Conditions Neurologic Conditions Diabetes Gastroenterological Conditions > Demographic profiles • Age, income, marital status, location, etc > Condition Profiles • Disease, impact, treatment type, activity at physician’s office > mHealth Use • use by disease category, device type, location, future needs
  • 14.
    STUDY REPORT: Consumer Useof Smartphones for Condition Related Health Activities Prepared by 14
  • 15.
    FDA mobile appsguidance 15
  • 16.
    What is thisthing? Advertising & Promotion 16 Medical Devices
  • 17.
    FDA is hereto help Released September 2013 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidan ce/GuidanceDocuments/UCM263366.pdf See also, http://www.scribd.com/doc/170875173/DH-Regulatory-AlertMobile-App-Guidance-Finalized 17
  • 18.
    MMA guidance Mobile MedicalApp (MMA) defined as: “a mobile app that meets the definition of device in section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act); and either is intended: • to be used as an accessory to a regulated medical device; or • to transform a mobile platform into a regulated medical device.” —FDA 18 Guidance for Industry: Mobile Medical Applications, page 7
  • 19.
    Digitas Health isalso here to help 19
  • 20.
    CDRH will focusits regulatory efforts on apps that: > Are accessories to a regulated medical device > Transform the mobile device into a medical device > Perform patient-specific analysis and provide patientspecific treatment recommendations 20
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
    CDRH will focusits regulatory efforts on apps that: > Are accessories to a regulated medical device > Transform the mobile device into a medical device > Perform patient-specific analysis and provide patientspecific treatment recommendations 23
  • 24.
    “Some mobile appsmay meet the definition of a medical device but because they pose a lower risk to the public, FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion over these devices (meaning it will not enforce requirements under the FD&C Act)” —FDA Guidance for Industry: Mobile Medical Applications, page 4 24
  • 25.
    Regulatory discretion FDA isasserting two things: 1. FDA has the legal authority to enforce legal and regulatory requirements in that area. 2. FDA will not use that authority. 25
  • 26.
    Will FDA changeits position? —FDA Mobile Apps Twitter Chat, September 26, 2013 26
  • 27.
    • Help patients (i.e.,users) self-manage their disease or conditions without providing specific treatment or treatment suggestions; • Provide patients with simple tools to organize and track their health information; • Provide easy access to information related to patients’ health conditions or treatments; • Help patients document, show, or communicate potential medical conditions to health care providers; • Automate simple tasks for health care providers; or • Enable patients or providers to interact with Personal Health Record (PHR) or Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. —FDA Guidance for Industry: Mobile Medical Applications, page 16 27
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
    What about dosingapps? “apps that use patient-specific parameters and calculate dosage or create a dosage plan for radiation therapy” ARE devices where FDA will require presubmission, etc. —FDA Guidance for Industry: Mobile Medical Applications, page 15 But… “Mobile apps that perform simple calculations routinely used in clinical practice” ARE devices where FDA will NOT require presubmission, etc. —FDA Guidance for Industry: Mobile Medical Applications, page 17 32
  • 33.
    Some will notbe subject to enforcement —FDA Mobile Apps Twitter Chat, September 26, 2013 33
  • 34.
  • 35.
    Meeting medical devicerequirements > Medical device manufacturer registration > Class determination (I, II, or III) > Validated development environment and/or quality systems in place > Investigational Device Exemption filing requirements > 510(k) or PMA filing with FDA likely required > Postmarketing reporting requirements 35
  • 36.
    Promotional labeling inmobile tactics 36
  • 37.
    Mobile apps aspromotional platforms Mobile apps can be advertising platforms (e.g., The New York Times app, Doximity) When the underlying app discusses health, the same rules apply > Is it a medical device? > Does regulatory discretion apply? > Is your paid placement an advertisement or part of the app’s core functionality? 37
  • 38.
    Promotional labeling requirements FourTypes of Communication Product Promotion Requirements > Reminder Ads > Product Name Usage > Product Promotions > Fair Balance > Disease Awareness Communications > Indication Statement > Redirecting Communications > Adequate Provision (Directions for Use) > MedWatch Statement > Beware turning your app into a regulated device via promotion! 38
  • 39.
    But what aboutmobile promotion? Unique considerations for mobile promotion > Device size > Device variability > Screen rotation > Technology changes (Go away, Flash!) > Screen takeover > Touch screen interface > Integration with the rest of the device (GPS, calendar, reminders, accelerometer, etc.) 39
  • 40.
    Questions? Dale Cooke Vice President/GroupDirector, Regulatory Review [email protected] @PhillyCooke on Twitter www.scribd.com/Dale_Cooke
  • 41.
    About the speaker: DaleCooke, VP/Group Director, Regulatory Dale Cooke is the head of the regulatory department for Digitas Health. He has worked with more than 30 pharmaceutical and medical device clients and with Medical-Legal-Regulatory committees around the world from offices in Philadelphia, New York, Boston, San Francisco, and London. Dale advises clients on FDA enforcement actions and provides recommendations for compliance with FDA regulations, with a focus on issues involving the Internet and emerging technology. His insights have been featured in the Wall Street Journal’s Health blog, The Pink Sheet, MedAdNews, PharmExec, and others. Dale is an active member of the Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society (RAPS), Drug Information Association (DIA), and the Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI). Dale is the author of Effective Review and Approval of Digital Promotional Tactics, which is part of the FDLI primer series. He is regularly invited to speak at industry conferences on topics including FDA enforcement trends, best practices for review processes, global review practices, and pharmaceutical involvement in social media. Dale earned his B.A. in Philosophy from Southern Methodist University and an M.A. in Analytical Philosophy from the University of Arizona and studied Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Drexel University’s School of Public Health. 41
  • 42.
    Geoff McCleary Vice President/GroupDirector, Mobile Innovations As group director of mobile innovation at Digitas Health, Geoff is responsible for all mobile channel strategy and oversight of mobile efforts globally for Digitas Health work across multiple offices for major pharmaceutical, healthcare, and biotech clients. Before joining the company in 2012, Geoff was head of strategy for mobile healthcare marketing agency Eveo. With responsibility for development of strategy, research and planning practices for an organization with over 40 healthcare apps in the app store. Prior to Eveo, Geoff was the VP Strategy for imc2 Health & Wellness, developing strategic vision and direction for the company’s east coast pharmaceutical clients. In addition, he was lead for the company’s Mobile Center of Excellence, providing mobile marketing consulting to major CPG brands as well as existing healthcare clients. More than 15 years of pharmaceutical and interactive marketing experience enables him to provide the most strategic mobile and technological insights to the world’s largest pharmaceutical clients. As a leading mobile marketing evangelist, Geoff has established himself as a proponent of using mobile tools, social media and emerging technologies to creative meaningful connections with patients, consumers and physicians. 42

Editor's Notes

  • #7 http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/more-people-access-cell-phones-toilets-010850961.html
  • #8 www.marketingcharts.com/direct/most-smartphone-owners-feel-naked-without-their-devices-21769
  • #9 blog.newrelic.com/wp-content/uploads/mobile_ig_final1.png
  • #17 “Ponder the individual impacts of the book, the newspaper, the telephone, the radio, the tape recorder, the camera, the video camera, the compass, the television, the VCR and the DVD, the personal computer, the cellphone, the video game and the iPod. The smartphone is all those things, and it fits in your pocket.” from New York Times, October 4, 2013
  • #28 Adherence apps Refill remindersSymptom trackersDoctor discussion guidesPatient support connection/communicationDosage calculators
  • #36 If app is an accessory to an already regulated mobile device (e.g., using an iPhone as a remote control for an MRI), then the app accessory has the same regulatory class and requirements as the device to which it is an accessory.