Uploaded byEstela Dauksiene
Revive VET quality tools for curriculum design
The document outlines quality assurance criteria for the integration of ICT in curriculum design within vocational education and training (VET). It presents a self-assessment and peer review tool structured around four main criterion groups: didactical/pedagogical aspects, information technologies, overall structure/organization, and learning organization, each containing specific criteria and sub-criteria for evaluation. Additionally, the tools are accessible from the Revive VET project website under a Creative Commons license.
More Related Content
![[EADTU OPEN VM WEBINAR] Presentation Eveliina Permi](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/thursday18june11401200eveliinapermicosopopresentation1806201-200618163238-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
![[EADTU-EU Online Summit] 6. COVID-19 Impact on Higher Education - Commission ...](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/6-200430125424-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
Similar to Revive VET quality tools for curriculum design
More from Estela Dauksiene
Revive VET quality tools for curriculum design
- 1. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ Quality assurance criteriafor integration of ICT in curriculum designing Estela Daukšienė Vytautas Magnus University Leonardo da Vinci TOI project REVIVE VET - Reviewing and Reviving VET practices
- 2. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ Revive VET curriculumlevel quality criteria authors • Airina Volungevičienė • Estela Daukšienė • Dalia Baziukė • Margarita Poškutė
- 3. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ Quality criteria forICT integration on Curriculum level: SELF-ASSESSMENT, CASE DEVELOPMENT, AND PEER REVIEW TOOL AIM – assessing and reviewing ICT integration on curriculum level – i.e. course or learning/study module
- 4.
- 5. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ Tool structure • Assessmentsummary • 4 Groups of criteria: A. Didactical/pedagogical part (A1-A6) B. Information technologies part (B1-B6) C. Overall structure, language and design (C1-C6) D. Learning organization (D1-D4) • Each group – 4-6 criteria
- 6. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ Tool structure • Eachcriterion is explained by subcriteria
- 7. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ Tool structure • sub-criterionare supported by descriptions
- 8. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ Tool structure • Itis also explained how to reach each of the criterion
- 9.
- 10.
- 11. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ Quality criteria forcurriculum design GROUP A. DIDACTICAL/ PEDAGOGICAL PART (A1 - A6) A1. Definition of competences and learning objectives is measurable A2. Variety of learning methods used A3. Assessment strategies clearly and measurably presented A4. Open Educational Resources used and learners encouraged to re-use them A5. Assignment description clear and to the point A6. Experiential validity ensured (practical application to professional practices)
- 12. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ Quality criteria forcurriculum design A.Didactical/pedagogical part, A1 criterion
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ B. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES •B1. Navigation and external links • B2. Publishing tools • B3. Group work and active learning tools employed • B4. Assesment, self-assesment and assignment tools • B5. Glossary of terms • B6. Recorded lectures and tools to support virtual classroom
- 19.
- 20.
- 21. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ C. OVERALL STRUCTURE,LANGUAGE AND DESIGN • C1. Soundness, clarity of writing, grammar • C2. Clarity of organization and suitability for the target group • C3. General esthetics • C4. Copyright issues • C5. Logical structure and flexible learning path possibility • C6. Bibliography and study resources
- 22. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ Quality criteria forcurriculum design D. LEARNING ORGANIZATION D1. Interactivity
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ D. LEARNING ORGANIZATION(D1- D4) • D1. Interactivity • D2. Learning support, eTutoring • D3. Workload and schedule • D4. Learner feedback
- 28. http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/ The tools areavailable at • Revive VET project website – reviveproject.eu/vet • You’re welcome to use them, respecting the licencing: • Revive VET quality tools by Revive VET consortium are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License • Based on a work at www.reviveproject.eu/vet.