RO Training Course
Cleaning RO and NF
Membrane Elements
Overview
Introductory Remarks
When to Clean
Cleaning Method Selection
Defining a Foulant and Scalant
pH and Temperature Limits
FT30 Resistance to Cleaning Agents
Cleaning Carbonate Scaling
Cleaning Sulfate Scaling
Overview (cont.)
Cleaning Organic Fouling
Cleaning Biological Fouling
Cleaning Iron Fouling
Cleaning Silt Fouling
Cleaning Carbon Fouling
Chemical Attack
Permeate Back Pressure
The Cleaning Process
Safety
Cleaning Introductory Remarks
Cleaning is a means of removing mineral scale, organic matter,
biological growth, colloidal particles, or insoluble constituents
which build up on the surface of the membrane
Frequent cleaning should not be required for a properly designed
and operated RO/NF system
Membranes may become fouled or scaled due to improper
operation or change in feedwater quality
Cleaning Introductory Remarks
(cont.)
Membranes’ elements can be cleaned effectively because:
chemical stability
broad pH tolerance
high temperature limits
Elements with oxidized membrane or mechanical damage must
be replaced
When to Clean
Normalized flow declines by 10%
Pressure drop increases by 15%
Normalized salt passage increases by 5%*
*Dependent on individual system design
Cleaning Regimen based on System
Performance and Water Chemistry
A wrong choice can aggravate a scaling/fouling
problem
Acids for scaling
Alkaline for biological fouling
Alkaline with detergent for organic fouling
Frequently both alkaline and acid cleanings are
required
Characterizing
Foulant or Scalant
Analyze the normalized plant performance
Analyze feed water quality
Check performance after previous cleanings
Analyze cartridge/SDI filter residue
Characterizing
Foulant or Scalant
Inspect lead element and feed scroll end for
suspended solids fouling
Inspect scroll of tail element for scaling
Clean and analyze cleaning solutions
(control samples required)
Destructive autopsy
pH Range and Temperature
Limits During Cleaning
Max Temp Max Temp Max Temp
50°C 35°C 30°C
pH Range pH Range pH Range
SW30/SW30HR 3 - 10 2 - 11 2 - 11.5
BW30/TW30 2 - 10 1 - 11 1 - 11.5
NF45 3 - 10 2 - 11 2 - 11
NF70 3 - 10 2 - 11 1 - 11.5
NF90 3 - 10 2 - 11 1 - 11.5
FT30 Cleaning Agents
Agent % Concentration Resistance
Hydrochloric Acid* 0.2 Excellent
Na-EDTA* 1.0 Excellent
Sodium Hydroxide* 0.1 Excellent
Nitric Acid 5.0 Excellent
Acetic Acid 5.0 Excellent
Boric Acid 5.0 Excellent
Phosphoric Acid 0.5 Excellent
Sodium Salt of Dodecylsulfate
(DSS or Lauryl Sulfate) 0.05 Excellent
Sodium Hydrosulfite 1.0 Excellent
Trisodium Phosphate (TSP) 2.0 Excellent
Sodium Triphosphate (STP) 2.0 Excellent
*Most common agents used
 Causes:
 High Hardness
 High pH
 High alkalinity
 High recovery rates
 Symptoms:
 Heavy element
 Low permeate flow
 Poor salt rejection
 High pressure drop
Carbonate Scaling
Carbonate Scaling (cont.)
Cleaning
0.2% (Wt) hydrochloric acid, HCI
0.5% (Wt) phosphoric acid, H3PO4
0.2% (Wt) sulfamic acid, NH2SO3H
Sulfate Scaling
Causes
Exceeding solubility limits
Loss of antiscalant
High recovery rates (Means increase saturation
level than solubility product)
Symptoms
Heavy element
Low permeate flow
Poor salt rejection
High pressure drop
Sulfate Scaling (cont.)
Cleaning
Very difficult to clean
2.0(Wt)% Na-EDTA and 0.1(Wt)% NaOH at pH12, 30°C
maximum
Overnight soak/recirculation may be necessary--
reaction slow
Biological/Organic Fouling
Causes
 Improper membrane preservation
 Biological/Organic material in feedwater
 Improper carbon bed maintenance
Symptoms
 Odor
 Moldy or discolored scroll end
 Low permeate flow
 High salt rejection
 High pressure drop
Biological/Organic Fouling
(cont.)
Cleaning (best solution)
0.5% - 1.0%(Wt) Na-EDTA and 0.1%(Wt) NaOH
At pH 12 and < 30°C (86°F)
Cleaning (alternate solutions)
0.1% (Wt) NaOH and .05% Na-DSS at pH 12 and
< 30°C (86°F)
1.0% (Wt) STP and 1.0% (Wt) Na-EDTA or
1.0% (Wt) TSP and 1.0% (Wt) Na-EDTA
Iron Fouling
Causes
Rusty well casings or piping
Air with greater than 0.1 ppm Fe in feedwater
Symptoms
Rust coloring on scroll end or ATD*
Rusty colored concentrate upon start-up
Low permeate flow
Poor salt rejection
*Anti-telescoping device
Iron Fouling (cont.)
Cleaning Solutions
1.0% (Wt) sodium hydrosulfite (best) Na2S2O4
2.0% Citric acid (Alternative)
0.5% (Wt) phosphoric acid H3PO4
0.2% (Wt) hydrochloric acid HCL
Silt Fouling
Causes
Turbid surface waters
High suspended solids
Inadequate pretreatment
Symptoms
Dirty feed scroll end
Low permeate flow/poor salt rejection
High permeate flow/very poor salt rejection
Heavy element
Silt Fouling (cont.)
Cleaning
Difficult to clean
Caustic and Na-EDTA
Proprietary Detergents
Carbon Fouling
Causes
Incorrect backwash and rinse rates resulting
in inadequate flushing of carbon bed
Soft carbon
Symptoms
Black deposits on scroll end
Low permeate flow (early stage)
Poor salt rejection
Carbon Fouling (cont.)
Cleaning
Very difficult to clean
Proprietary Detergents
Chemical Attack
Causes
Incomplete dechlorination (oxidation)
Exposure to strong oxidants
(i.e., permanganate)
Prolonged exposure to pH extremes
Symptoms
Very high permeate flow
Very poor salt rejection
Damage irreversible, elements must be replaced
Permeate Backpressure
Damage
Causes
Mechanical failure in system
Inappropriate design
Operation error
Symptoms
High permeate flow and very poor rejection
Evidence
Wrinkles in membrane near back glue line
Damage irreversible, elements must be replaced
Cleaning Process Steps
Mix cleaning solution
Low flow pumping (low psi)
Recycle
Soak
High flow pumping (low psi)
Flush out
Use permeate for solutions and flush
Recommend Feed Flow
Rate Per Pressure Vessel
Element Diameter Feed Pressure* Feed Flow
Rate
inches (psig) gpm
2.5 20-60 3-5
4 20-60 8-10
6 20-60 16-
20
8 20-60 30-
40*Dependent on number of elements in pressure vessel
Cleaning System
®
Permeate from
Storage Tank
Cleaning Tank Cartridge Filter RO Unit
Permeate to Storage Tank
(Normal Operation)
Permeate to
Cleaning Tank
(Cleaning Operation)
Concentrate to
Cleaning Tank
(Cleaning Operation)
Concentrate
to Drain
(Normal Operation)
Safety
Review MSDS documents
Use protective equipment:
goggles, gloves and clothing
Vent tanks and/or cleaning area
Assure chemical compatibility with system hardware
Dispose of spent solutions and chemicals accordance
with local regulations
Properly mix chemicals (i.e., acid into water, etc.)
Open Question
Thank you for your attention

RO & NF chemical cleaning

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Cleaning RO andNF Membrane Elements
  • 3.
    Overview Introductory Remarks When toClean Cleaning Method Selection Defining a Foulant and Scalant pH and Temperature Limits FT30 Resistance to Cleaning Agents Cleaning Carbonate Scaling Cleaning Sulfate Scaling
  • 4.
    Overview (cont.) Cleaning OrganicFouling Cleaning Biological Fouling Cleaning Iron Fouling Cleaning Silt Fouling Cleaning Carbon Fouling Chemical Attack Permeate Back Pressure The Cleaning Process Safety
  • 5.
    Cleaning Introductory Remarks Cleaningis a means of removing mineral scale, organic matter, biological growth, colloidal particles, or insoluble constituents which build up on the surface of the membrane Frequent cleaning should not be required for a properly designed and operated RO/NF system Membranes may become fouled or scaled due to improper operation or change in feedwater quality
  • 6.
    Cleaning Introductory Remarks (cont.) Membranes’elements can be cleaned effectively because: chemical stability broad pH tolerance high temperature limits Elements with oxidized membrane or mechanical damage must be replaced
  • 7.
    When to Clean Normalizedflow declines by 10% Pressure drop increases by 15% Normalized salt passage increases by 5%* *Dependent on individual system design
  • 8.
    Cleaning Regimen basedon System Performance and Water Chemistry A wrong choice can aggravate a scaling/fouling problem Acids for scaling Alkaline for biological fouling Alkaline with detergent for organic fouling Frequently both alkaline and acid cleanings are required
  • 9.
    Characterizing Foulant or Scalant Analyzethe normalized plant performance Analyze feed water quality Check performance after previous cleanings Analyze cartridge/SDI filter residue
  • 10.
    Characterizing Foulant or Scalant Inspectlead element and feed scroll end for suspended solids fouling Inspect scroll of tail element for scaling Clean and analyze cleaning solutions (control samples required) Destructive autopsy
  • 11.
    pH Range andTemperature Limits During Cleaning Max Temp Max Temp Max Temp 50°C 35°C 30°C pH Range pH Range pH Range SW30/SW30HR 3 - 10 2 - 11 2 - 11.5 BW30/TW30 2 - 10 1 - 11 1 - 11.5 NF45 3 - 10 2 - 11 2 - 11 NF70 3 - 10 2 - 11 1 - 11.5 NF90 3 - 10 2 - 11 1 - 11.5
  • 12.
    FT30 Cleaning Agents Agent% Concentration Resistance Hydrochloric Acid* 0.2 Excellent Na-EDTA* 1.0 Excellent Sodium Hydroxide* 0.1 Excellent Nitric Acid 5.0 Excellent Acetic Acid 5.0 Excellent Boric Acid 5.0 Excellent Phosphoric Acid 0.5 Excellent Sodium Salt of Dodecylsulfate (DSS or Lauryl Sulfate) 0.05 Excellent Sodium Hydrosulfite 1.0 Excellent Trisodium Phosphate (TSP) 2.0 Excellent Sodium Triphosphate (STP) 2.0 Excellent *Most common agents used
  • 13.
     Causes:  HighHardness  High pH  High alkalinity  High recovery rates  Symptoms:  Heavy element  Low permeate flow  Poor salt rejection  High pressure drop Carbonate Scaling
  • 14.
    Carbonate Scaling (cont.) Cleaning 0.2%(Wt) hydrochloric acid, HCI 0.5% (Wt) phosphoric acid, H3PO4 0.2% (Wt) sulfamic acid, NH2SO3H
  • 15.
    Sulfate Scaling Causes Exceeding solubilitylimits Loss of antiscalant High recovery rates (Means increase saturation level than solubility product) Symptoms Heavy element Low permeate flow Poor salt rejection High pressure drop
  • 16.
    Sulfate Scaling (cont.) Cleaning Verydifficult to clean 2.0(Wt)% Na-EDTA and 0.1(Wt)% NaOH at pH12, 30°C maximum Overnight soak/recirculation may be necessary-- reaction slow
  • 17.
    Biological/Organic Fouling Causes  Impropermembrane preservation  Biological/Organic material in feedwater  Improper carbon bed maintenance Symptoms  Odor  Moldy or discolored scroll end  Low permeate flow  High salt rejection  High pressure drop
  • 18.
    Biological/Organic Fouling (cont.) Cleaning (bestsolution) 0.5% - 1.0%(Wt) Na-EDTA and 0.1%(Wt) NaOH At pH 12 and < 30°C (86°F) Cleaning (alternate solutions) 0.1% (Wt) NaOH and .05% Na-DSS at pH 12 and < 30°C (86°F) 1.0% (Wt) STP and 1.0% (Wt) Na-EDTA or 1.0% (Wt) TSP and 1.0% (Wt) Na-EDTA
  • 19.
    Iron Fouling Causes Rusty wellcasings or piping Air with greater than 0.1 ppm Fe in feedwater Symptoms Rust coloring on scroll end or ATD* Rusty colored concentrate upon start-up Low permeate flow Poor salt rejection *Anti-telescoping device
  • 20.
    Iron Fouling (cont.) CleaningSolutions 1.0% (Wt) sodium hydrosulfite (best) Na2S2O4 2.0% Citric acid (Alternative) 0.5% (Wt) phosphoric acid H3PO4 0.2% (Wt) hydrochloric acid HCL
  • 21.
    Silt Fouling Causes Turbid surfacewaters High suspended solids Inadequate pretreatment Symptoms Dirty feed scroll end Low permeate flow/poor salt rejection High permeate flow/very poor salt rejection Heavy element
  • 22.
    Silt Fouling (cont.) Cleaning Difficultto clean Caustic and Na-EDTA Proprietary Detergents
  • 23.
    Carbon Fouling Causes Incorrect backwashand rinse rates resulting in inadequate flushing of carbon bed Soft carbon Symptoms Black deposits on scroll end Low permeate flow (early stage) Poor salt rejection
  • 24.
    Carbon Fouling (cont.) Cleaning Verydifficult to clean Proprietary Detergents
  • 25.
    Chemical Attack Causes Incomplete dechlorination(oxidation) Exposure to strong oxidants (i.e., permanganate) Prolonged exposure to pH extremes Symptoms Very high permeate flow Very poor salt rejection Damage irreversible, elements must be replaced
  • 26.
    Permeate Backpressure Damage Causes Mechanical failurein system Inappropriate design Operation error Symptoms High permeate flow and very poor rejection Evidence Wrinkles in membrane near back glue line Damage irreversible, elements must be replaced
  • 27.
    Cleaning Process Steps Mixcleaning solution Low flow pumping (low psi) Recycle Soak High flow pumping (low psi) Flush out Use permeate for solutions and flush
  • 28.
    Recommend Feed Flow RatePer Pressure Vessel Element Diameter Feed Pressure* Feed Flow Rate inches (psig) gpm 2.5 20-60 3-5 4 20-60 8-10 6 20-60 16- 20 8 20-60 30- 40*Dependent on number of elements in pressure vessel
  • 29.
    Cleaning System ® Permeate from StorageTank Cleaning Tank Cartridge Filter RO Unit Permeate to Storage Tank (Normal Operation) Permeate to Cleaning Tank (Cleaning Operation) Concentrate to Cleaning Tank (Cleaning Operation) Concentrate to Drain (Normal Operation)
  • 30.
    Safety Review MSDS documents Useprotective equipment: goggles, gloves and clothing Vent tanks and/or cleaning area Assure chemical compatibility with system hardware Dispose of spent solutions and chemicals accordance with local regulations Properly mix chemicals (i.e., acid into water, etc.)
  • 31.
  • 32.
    Thank you foryour attention