Robbins eob9 inst_ppt_09

Robbins eob9 inst_ppt_09

• 1.
  Understanding Work TeamsChapter 9 Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 9/e Stephen P. Robbins/Timothy A. Judge
• 2.
  After studying thischapter, you should be able to: Explain the growing popularity of teams in organizations Contrast teams with groups Identify four types of teams Specify the characteristics of effective teams Explain how organizations can create team players Describe conditions when teams are preferred over individuals
• 3.
  Why have teamsbecome so popular? Outperform individuals on tasks requiring multiple skills, judgment, and experience Better utilization of employee talents More flexible and responsive to changing events Effective way for management to democratize the organization and increase employee motivation
• 4.
  Work Group vs.Work Team Work Group - A group who interacts primarily to share information and to make decisions to help one another perform within each member’s area of responsibility Work Team - Generates positive synergy through coordinated effort; Individual efforts result in a level of performance that is greater than the sum of those individual inputs
• 5.
  Comparing Work Groupsand Work Teams
• 6.
  Four Types ofTeams
• 7.
  Problem-Solving Teams Shareideas or offer suggestions on how work processes and methods can be improved Rarely given authority to unilaterally implement any of their suggested actions
• 8.
  Self-Managed Work TeamsTypically 10-15 employees Team takes on supervisory responsibilities in addition to job tasks Select and evaluate members Effectiveness is situationally dependent
• 9.
  Cross-Functional Teams Membersfrom diverse areas within and between organizations Exchange information Develop new ideas and solve problems Coordinate complex projects Development may be time-consuming due to complexity and diversity
• 10.
  Virtual Teams Computertechnology ties physically dispersed members together to achieve a common goal Differentiating factors from other teams Absence of para-verbal and non-verbal cues Limited social context Ability to overcome time and space constraints
• 11.
  Key Components of Effective Teams Context Composition Work Design Process
• 12.
  Context Presence ofadequate resources Effective leadership Climate of trust Performance evaluation and reward system that reflects team contributions
• 13.
  Composition Abilities ofmembers Personality Allocating roles Diversity Size of teams Member flexibility Member preferences
• 14.
  Work Design Freedom& Autonomy Skill variety Task identity Task significance
• 15.
  Process Member commitmentto a common purpose Establishment of specific team goals Team efficacy Managed level of conflict Minimizing social loafing
• 16.
  Shaping Team PlayersSelection – in addition to technical skills, managers must select employees who have the interpersonal skills to be team players Training – workshops on problem-solving, communications, negotiation, conflict-management and coaching skills help build team members Rewards – rework to encourage cooperative efforts rather than competitive ones
• 17.
  Teams and QualityManagement Teams provide the natural vehicle for employees to share ideas and to implement improvements
• 18.
  Is a Teamthe Answer? Questions to consider when determining if work is better done by a team: Can the work be done better by more than one person? Does the work create a common purpose or set of goals for the people in the group that is more than the aggregate of individual goals? Are the members of the group interdependent?
• 19.
  Implications for ManagersCommon characteristics of effective teams: Individuals with technical and interpersonal skills Have 10 or fewer members with diverse backgrounds Members fill roles but are flexible and prefer to be part of a group Members are committed to a common purpose
• 20.
  Summary Explained thegrowing popularity of teams in organizations Contrasted teams with groups Identified four types of teams Specified the characteristics of effective teams Explained how organizations can create team players Described conditions when teams are preferred over individuals