Download to read offline
More Related Content
Similar to SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION.ppt
SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION.ppt
- 1. SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION ANDSAMPLING TECHNIQUES BY AMUGUNE B.K MENTAL HEALTH WORKSHOP MAANZONI, 15TH OCTOBER 2014
- 2. What size sampledo I need?” The answer to this question is influenced by a number of factors, including: • the purpose of the study, population size, the risk of selecting a “bad” sample and the allowable sampling error. • Data analysis plan e.g number of cells one will have in cross tabulation • Most of all whether undertaking a qualitative or quantitative study
- 3. Sample size determinationin qualitative study • Probability sampling not appropriate as sample not intended to be statistically representative • But, sample should have ability to represent salient characteristics in population. • Sample size taken until point of theoretical saturation
- 4. ……. • Sample sizeis usually small to allow in- depth exploration and understanding of phenomena under investigation • Ultimately a matter of judgement and expertise in evaluating the quality of information against final use, research methodology , sampling strategy and results is necessary. • In practice, qualitative sampling usually requires a flexible, pragmatic approach.
- 5. ….. • The researcheractively selects the most productive sample to answer the research question. • This can involve developing a framework of the variables that might influence an individual's contribution and will be based on the researcher's practical knowledge of the research area, the available literature and evidence from the study itself. • This is a more intellectual strategy than the simple demographic stratification of epidemiological studies, though age, gender and social class might be important variables.
- 6. ……. • If thesubjects are known to the researcher, they may be stratified according to known public attitudes or beliefs • It may be advantageous to study a broad range of subjects : • (maximum variation sample) • outliers (deviant sample) • subjects who have specific experiences (critical case sample) • subjects with special expertise (key informant sample).
- 7. ……. • The iterativeprocess of qualitative study design means that samples are usually theory driven ( theoretical sampling) to a greater or lesser extent • Theoretical sampling necessitates building interpretative theories from the emerging data and selecting a new sample to examine and elaborate on this theory. • It is the principal strategy for the grounded theoretical approach .
- 8. Some suggestions ofsample size in qualitative studies • The smallest number of participants should be 15 • Should lie under 50 • 6-8 participants for FGDs AND at least 2 FGDs per population group IMPORTANT • Attainment of saturation • Justification of choice of number
- 9. Sampling strategy inqualitative study/ Non- Random Sampling Methods 1. Convenience sampling • This is the least rigorous technique, involving the selection • of the subjects. • Using group that is handy/available, most accessible (or volunteers) in terms of time, effort and money, • but may result in poor quality data and lacks intellectual credibility. • There is an element of convenience sampling in many qualitative studies, but a more thoughtful approach to selection of a sample is usually justified. • Avoid, if possible, since tend not to be representative due to homogeneity of groups
- 10. 2. Purposive/ Judgmentsampling • most common • Using personal judgment to select sample that should be representative OR selecting those who are known to have needed information. • Snowball is a type (used with hard to identify groups such as addicts)
- 11. other considerations inqualitative in sample size determination • Multiple replications – enhances generalization when non-random sampling is used e.g use of > 1 FGD • Ecological generalization may also be used – generalise to other settings/conditions, such as using a method tested in math for English class
- 12. Sample size determinationin quantitative study Several criteria will need to be specified to determine the appropriate sample size: –Level of precision, –Level of confidence or risk, –Degree of variability in the attributes being measured ( prevalence) –External validity
- 13. ……. • The Levelof Precision-sometimes called sampling error – range in which the true value of the population is estimated to be. – This range is often expressed in percentage points (e.g., ±5 percent). • The Confidence Level – based on ideas encompassed under the Central Limit Theorem. – E.g a 95% confidence level is selected, 95 out of 100 samples will have the true population value within the range of precision
- 14. ……. Degree of Variability –refersto the distribution of attributes in the population. –The more heterogeneous a population, the larger the sample size required to obtain a given level of precision. –The less variable (more homogeneous) a population, the smaller the sample size.
- 15. …… • A proportionof 50 % indicates a greater level of variability than either 20% or 80%. This is because 20% and 80% indicate that a large majority do not or do, respectively, have the attribute of interest. • Because a proportion of 0.5 indicates the maximum variability in a population, it is often used in determining a more conservative sample size, that is, the sample size may be larger than if the true variability of the population attribute were used.
- 16. …… • Sample sizeaffects accuracy of representation; Larger sample means less chance of error • Minimum suggested sample is 30 and upper limit is 1,000 External validity – how well sample generalizes to the population, a representative sample is required (not the same thing as variety in a sample)
- 17. Strategies for DeterminingSample Size There are several approaches to determining the sample size. • Using a census for small populations • Imitating a sample size of similar studies • Using published tables • Applying formulas to calculate a sample size • Use computer soft ware e.g EPI-info series
- 18. Using a Censusfor Small Populations …. • One approach is to use the entire population as the sample. • Although cost considerations make this impossible for large populations. • Attractive for small populations (e.g., 200 or less). • Eliminates sampling error and provides data on all the individuals in the population. • Some costs such as questionnaire design and developing the sampling frame are “fixed,” that is, they will be the same for samples of 50 or 200. • Finally, virtually the entire population would have to be sampled in small populations to achieve a desirable level of precision
- 19. Using a SampleSize of a Similar Study • Use the same sample size as those of studies similar to the one you plan( Cite reference). • Without reviewing the procedures employed in these studies you may run the risk of repeating errors that were made in determining the sample size for another study. • However, a review of the literature in your discipline can provide guidance about “typical” sample sizes that are used.
- 20. Using Published Tables •Published tables provide the sample size for a given set of criteria. • Necessary for given combinations of precision, confidence levels and variability. • The sample sizes presume that the attributes being measured are distributed normally or nearly so. • Although tables can provide a useful guide for determining the sample size, you may need to calculate the necessary sample size for a different combination of levels of precision, confidence, and variability.
- 21. Sample Size for±5%, ±7% and ±10% Precision Levels where Confidence Level Is 95% and P=.5. Size of Population Sample Size (n) for Precision (e) of: ±5% ±7% ±10% 100 81 67 51 125 96 78 56 150 110 86 61 175 122 94 64 200 134 101 67 225 144 107 70 250 154 112 72 275 163 117 74 300 172 121 76 325 180 125 77 350 187 129 78 375 194 132 80 400 201 135 81 425 207 138 82 450 212 140 82
- 22. Using Formulas toCalculate a Sample Size • Sample size can be determined by the application of one of several mathematical formulae. • Formula mostly used for calculating a sample for proportions. For example: • For populations that are large, the Cochran (1963:75) equation yields a representative sample for proportions. • Fisher equation, Mugenda etc
- 23. Cochran equation Where n0is the sample size, Z2 is the abscissa of the normal curve that cuts off an area α at the tails; (1 – α) equals the desired confidence level, e.g., 95%); e is the desired level of precision, p is the estimated proportion of an attribute that is present in the population,and q is 1-p. The value for Z is found in statistical tables which contain the area under the normal curve. e.g Z = 1.96 for 95 % level of confidence
- 24. ….. A Simplified FormulaFor Proportions • Yamane (1967:886) provides a simplified formula to calculate sample sizes. • ASSUMPTION: – 95% confidence level – P = .5 ;
- 25. …….. Where n isthe sample size, N is the population size, e is the level of precision.
- 26. Finite population correctionfor proportions • With finite populations, correction for proportions is necessary • If the population is small then the sample size can be reduced slightly. • This is because a given sample size provides proportionately more information for a small population than for a large population. • The sample size (n0) can thus be adjusted using the corrected formulae
- 27. ….. Where n isthe sample size N is the population size. no is calculated sample size for infinite population
- 28. Note • The samplesize formulas provide the number of responses that need to be obtained. Many researchers commonly add 10 % to the sample size to compensate for persons that the researcher is unable to contact. • The sample size also is often increased by 30 % to compensate for non-response ( e.g self administered questionnaires).
- 29. Use of softwarein sample size determination Depending on type of study and specific software Some information will be required: • Population sample size, population standard deviation, population sampling error, confidence level, z –value, power of study etc … • 80% power in a clinical trial means that the study has a 80% chance of ending up with a p value of less than 5% in a statistical test (i.e. a statistically significant treatment effect) if there really was an important difference (e.g. 10% versus 5% mortality) between treatments.
- 30. Further considerations • Theabove approaches to determining sample size have assumed that a simple random sample is the sampling design. • More complex designs, e.g. case control studies etc , one must take into account the variances of sub-populations, strata, or clusters before an estimate of the variability in the population as a whole can be made.
- 31. Sampling strategies inquantitative research Simple random sampling • e.g Names in a hat or table of random numbers • Larger samples more likely to represent population • Any difference between population and sample is random and small (random sampling error)
- 32. Stratified random sampling •Ensures small subgroups (strata) are represented • Normally proportional to their part of population • Break population into strata, then randomly select within strata • Multistage sampling
- 33. Cluster random sampling •Select groups as sample units rather than individuals • REQUIRES a large number of groups/clusters • Multistage sampling
- 34. Systematic (Nth) sampling •Either Considered random or non random • Random- if list is randomly ordered • nonrandom- systematic with random starting point • Divide population size by sample size to get N (population size/sample size=Nth)