SlideShare a Scribd company logo
IPEC Small Claims Checklist
Jane Lambert1
12 April 2017
1. Have you read the Guide to the Intellectual
Property Enterprise Court Small Claims Track
(“the Guide”), CPR Parts 27 and 63 and the
Parts 27 and 63 Practice Directions?
These are very important because they set out and
explain the rules that the Court will apply to your
case. They can be downloaded from the Ministry of
Justice website.2
2. Can your case be brought in the IPEC Small
Claims Track?
Although para 4.3 of the Guide says that the Small
Claims Track is only suitable for copyright, trade
mark, passing off, unregistered design right and
registered Community design cases, CPR 63.27
says that a claim may be started in, or transferred
to, the Small Claims Track if CPR 63.13 applies but
not CPR 62.2 and the value of the claim is not more
than £10,000. CPR 63.13 refers to a much longer
list in para 16.1 of the Part 63 Practice Direction
and includes technical trade secrets, database
rights and rights in performances as well as those
listed in para 4.3 of the Guide. As para 1 of the
Guide says:
“Where there is any conflict or confusion between
the provisions of this Guide and the CPR, you must
follow the rules and practices as set out in the CPR”
It would appear that the Guide is too restrictive.
However, just because a case can be brought
before the Small Claims track, it doesn’t mean it
must be. You have to ask for the case to be
1
​Barrister, 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square, London, WC1R 5AH,
Tel 020 7404 5252, Email jlambert@4-5.co.uk,
http://nipclaw.blogspot.co.uk/p/profile.html
2
The Guide can be downloaded from
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/a
ttachment_data/file/426129/patents-court-small-claims.pdf
and CPR Parts 27 and 63 and the Parts 27 and 63
Practiice Directions from
http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules
allocated to the Small Claims Track in your
Particulars of Claim and the other side may object
to your request. If he or she does object, the Court
will decide whether the case is suitable for the
Small Claims Track (see paragraph 9 below).
3. Have you sent the other side a letter before
claim that complies with CPR 63.20 (2)?
There are two traps here and you may need to
consult a lawyer specializing in intellectual property
law or a patent or trade mark attorney with the right
3
to conduct litigation to avoid them. The first of those
traps is that the Practice Direction referred to by
CPR 63.20 (2) no longer exists but CPR 63.20 (2)
still requires compliance with it. The former Practice
Direction gave detailed instructions as to what
should be in a letter before claim and the evidence
that should be contained in it. The second trap is
that threatening certain types of intellectual property
actions without justification can be actionable. In
other words, the other side can sue you merely for
threatening IP infringement proceedings in some
circumstances. The laws on groundless threats are
complex and not all lawyers understand them
because there are no similar laws outside IP. That
is why you may need specialist advice on that point.
4. Have you considered any Response by the
Other Side?
The other side may have spotted a flaw in your
argument, produced evidence which is incompatible
with your case or suggested talks or mediation to
resolve the dispute. If they have done any of those
things you have to consider their response and
formulate an answer. Again, you have to be careful.
If the Court thinks you have acted unreasonably by
pressing on with a flawed claim in the face of a valid
objection or squandering the opportunity for a fair
settlement, it could penalize in several ways.
5. Have you drafted Particulars of Claim?
Read paragraph 7.6 of the Guide very carefully.
This is an important document and one for which
you may need specialist counsel or a solicitor or a
patent or trade mark attorney advocate. Your
particulars of claim should identify the intellectual
property right that you believe to have been
infringed, state how it arises, explain how it has
been infringed and set out the remedies you require
and why you are entitled to them. If you claim
3
These would include barristers who are members of the
Intellectual Property Bar Association or solicitors whose
firms are members of the Intellectual Property Lawyers
Association.
money from the other side you must show how you
have worked out your claim. You must limit your
money claim to £10,000 in your Particulars of
Claim. That is very important because the Small
Claims Track cannot hear claims for more than that
amount. You must also state whether you have
complied with CPR 63.20 (2) which is mentioned in
paragraph 2 above and ask for the case to be
allocated to the Small Claims Track.
6. Have you issued your Claim Form properly?
You need to download a claim form (Form N1) and
the Notes for claimant on completing a claim form
(Leaflet N1A) from HM Courts and Tribunals
Service website or obtain them from a law stationer
4
or any County Court Office. You should read the
leaflet and paragraph 7.2 of the Guide carefully and
fill in the form as prescribed. You then post your
claim form and particulars of claim with the correct
fee to the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court at:
The Rolls Building,
7 Rolls Building,
Fetter Lane,
London,
EC4A 1NL.
Alternatively, you can take those documents by
hand to the public counter of the Rolls Building
(nearest underground stations Chancery Lane and
Temple).
7. Have you served the Claim Form and
Particulars of Claim correctly?
It is your job to serve the claim form and particulars
of claim on the other side and not the Court’s.
5
Read CPR Part 6 and the Part 6 Practice Direction
and paragraphs 7.3. 7.4 and 7.5 of the Guide very
carefully. You must make sure that you include a
response pack with sealed copies of the claim form
and particulars of claim. If you do not do that the
claim will not be served properly and the defendant
can apply to set aside any orders or judgments that
you may have obtained against him or her.
8. Has the Defendant responded in Time?
Read paragraphs 7.5 and 7.7 of the Guide very
carefully for the time limits and applying for
judgment in default. If the 48 or, as the case may
be, the 70-day time limit has expired and you have
4
http://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/HMCTS/FormFinder.
do
5
We should now call him, her or it “the defendant”.
not yet received his or her defence, check with the
Court office as to whether they have received a
defence. Sometimes, a defendant files a defence
with the Court but does not serve it on the claimant.
If the defendant has not filed and served a defence
in time you can consider an application for a default
judgment.
9. Does the Defendant object to the Case in the
Small Claims Track?
If the defendant objects to the Small Claims Track
he or she can say so in the defence. There may be
all sorts of good reasons why he or she objects.
The case may involve a new or difficult point of law
which should be decided by a Circuit or even a High
Court judge. Or the defendant may believe that the
claimant will have to drop the case if he or she risks
costs on the Multitrack or High Court scale. Where
one side wants the case to proceed in the Small
Claims Track and the other side does not, the Court
sends both sides a directions questionnaire and
considers the parties’ responses. Sometimes the
Court orders a hearing at this point. Transferring a
case to the Multitrack leaves the Claimant with a
difficult choice. Does he or she discontinue before
the costs have mounted or is he or she sufficiently
confident of the strengths of the claim to risk an
adverse costs order? That is another issue upon
which the Claimant may need to take specialist
legal advice.
10. Have you complied with the Court’s
Directions
If the Defendant does not object to the Small Claims
Track or the Court dismisses the Defendant’s
objections, it will give directions for the further
conduct of the case. Usually, it will give those
directions without a hearing. These will include a
timetable for the exchange of evidence and a date
for the final hearing of the claim, unless the parties
agree that the claim can be decided by without a
hearing. Evidence will usually take the form of
witness statements exhibiting the documents relied
upon. Sometimes the parties are directed to
exchange skeleton arguments. It is your job to
comply with those directions punctually.
11. Are you and your Witnesses ready for the
Final Hearing?
Most hearings take place at the Royal Courts of
Justice in the Strand. You should make sure that
you arrive at the courtroom in good time with your
witnesses and documents. ⃞

More Related Content

PPTX
Legal Aspects PowerPointPresentation F&V.pptx
Fortunate24
 
PDF
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Series: Newbie Litigator School)
Financial Poise
 
PPT
15 March 2016 - Law Institute of Victoria conference presentation.
Andrew Downie
 
PPTX
SMALL CLAIM TRACK
ACID_SLIDES
 
PDF
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
PDF
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
PDF
Discovery Practice
Financial Poise
 
PDF
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
Legal Aspects PowerPointPresentation F&V.pptx
Fortunate24
 
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Series: Newbie Litigator School)
Financial Poise
 
15 March 2016 - Law Institute of Victoria conference presentation.
Andrew Downie
 
SMALL CLAIM TRACK
ACID_SLIDES
 
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
Discovery Practice
Financial Poise
 
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 

Similar to Small Claims Track Checklist (20)

PDF
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
DOCX
Option Wireless LTD v. OpenPeak, Inc.Be sure to save an elec.docx
jacksnathalie
 
DOCX
Option Wireless LTD v. OpenPeak, Inc.Be sure to save an elec.docx
mccormicknadine86
 
PDF
NEWBIE LITIGATOR SCHOOL - Part I 2022 - The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Financial Poise
 
PDF
Discovery Practice (Series: Newbie Litigator School - Fall Edition)
Financial Poise
 
DOCX
Mass. court of appeals website info
Umesh Heendeniya
 
PDF
Cpc learning module 3 pleading
Dr. Vikas Khakare
 
PDF
Proposed rules on hearing & adjudicating disputes
Harve Abella
 
PPT
Infringement and right to-use presentation
Michael E. Dukes
 
PDF
Best Practices for Preparing Strong Adjudication Claims in Australia
wizardrenovation
 
PPTX
Presentation on CPC Case Managment by Mr. Murtaza Khan, CJ-III Swat
Aslam Parvaiz
 
PDF
Case A51YJ932 n181 direction questionaire
Douglas GARDINER
 
PPTX
Summary proceedingS- An Overview
Priyanka Agarwal
 
PDF
2 claims under new fidic
AhmetArslan47
 
PDF
Federal Circuit Review | June 2013
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
 
PDF
Federal Circuit Review | July 2013
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
 
PDF
RECEIVED A SUMMONS- WHAT NOW?
Natasha Schwartz-Ebersohn
 
DOCX
eCourt malpractice traps and relation back
Oregon Law Practice Management
 
PDF
Please satisfy yourself
JoanneMarsh
 
PDF
Losing Points Arbitration Procedures
LE & TRAN | Trial Lawyers
 
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
Option Wireless LTD v. OpenPeak, Inc.Be sure to save an elec.docx
jacksnathalie
 
Option Wireless LTD v. OpenPeak, Inc.Be sure to save an elec.docx
mccormicknadine86
 
NEWBIE LITIGATOR SCHOOL - Part I 2022 - The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Financial Poise
 
Discovery Practice (Series: Newbie Litigator School - Fall Edition)
Financial Poise
 
Mass. court of appeals website info
Umesh Heendeniya
 
Cpc learning module 3 pleading
Dr. Vikas Khakare
 
Proposed rules on hearing & adjudicating disputes
Harve Abella
 
Infringement and right to-use presentation
Michael E. Dukes
 
Best Practices for Preparing Strong Adjudication Claims in Australia
wizardrenovation
 
Presentation on CPC Case Managment by Mr. Murtaza Khan, CJ-III Swat
Aslam Parvaiz
 
Case A51YJ932 n181 direction questionaire
Douglas GARDINER
 
Summary proceedingS- An Overview
Priyanka Agarwal
 
2 claims under new fidic
AhmetArslan47
 
Federal Circuit Review | June 2013
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
 
Federal Circuit Review | July 2013
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
 
RECEIVED A SUMMONS- WHAT NOW?
Natasha Schwartz-Ebersohn
 
eCourt malpractice traps and relation back
Oregon Law Practice Management
 
Please satisfy yourself
JoanneMarsh
 
Losing Points Arbitration Procedures
LE & TRAN | Trial Lawyers
 
Ad

More from Jane Lambert (20)

PDF
G2_21 and the English Approach to Plausibility.pdf
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
G2_21 and the English Approach to Plausibility.pptx
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
IP Training for Local Government Officials .pptx
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Safeguarding Your Investment in Convergent Content
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Patents and alternatives to patenting.pdf
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
The UK YORUBA Trade Mark Registration
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Copyright Licensing and ICT
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
IP After Brexit
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
What every Business in Wales needs to know about Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
What every business in Bradford needs to know about Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
IP After Brexit
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
How Brexit has changed IP Law
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
The Supreme Court Rules on FRAND
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Understanding Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Patents 101 Part 1 The Basics
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Patents 101 Part 5 - Infringement
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
Patents101 Part 5 -Infringement
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Patents 101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent
Jane Lambert
 
PPTX
Patents101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent
Jane Lambert
 
PDF
Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability
Jane Lambert
 
G2_21 and the English Approach to Plausibility.pdf
Jane Lambert
 
G2_21 and the English Approach to Plausibility.pptx
Jane Lambert
 
IP Training for Local Government Officials .pptx
Jane Lambert
 
Safeguarding Your Investment in Convergent Content
Jane Lambert
 
Patents and alternatives to patenting.pdf
Jane Lambert
 
The UK YORUBA Trade Mark Registration
Jane Lambert
 
Copyright Licensing and ICT
Jane Lambert
 
IP After Brexit
Jane Lambert
 
What every Business in Wales needs to know about Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
What every business in Bradford needs to know about Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
IP After Brexit
Jane Lambert
 
How Brexit has changed IP Law
Jane Lambert
 
The Supreme Court Rules on FRAND
Jane Lambert
 
Understanding Intellectual Property
Jane Lambert
 
Patents 101 Part 1 The Basics
Jane Lambert
 
Patents 101 Part 5 - Infringement
Jane Lambert
 
Patents101 Part 5 -Infringement
Jane Lambert
 
Patents 101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent
Jane Lambert
 
Patents101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent
Jane Lambert
 
Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability
Jane Lambert
 
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
DPT-3 Filing With ROC for Private Limited Companies
Kartik Verma
 
PPTX
DR. GOSWAMI Forensic Justice - December 2024 - FINAL Full.pptx
AshutoshPandey331709
 
PPTX
Military Unit symbols, vision and conclusion
antarikshdhaka
 
PPTX
CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN 1956 by Shahzaman chandio
Shahzaman Chandio
 
PDF
Career Overview of James William Bain of Colorado
James William Bain
 
PDF
Delay of 19 years- Advocate Rohit Dandriyal order.pdf
chamberofadvrohitdan
 
PDF
Female Giggers' Discrimination - Dr. Yanki Hartijasti.pdf
sakshikothari33
 
PDF
Hands of the Land_ Rediscovering Heritage Through Rural Crafts by Jeffrey Kal...
Jeffrey Kaliel
 
PDF
STATUTE-130-Pg2000.pdf LEI MAGNITISKY U.S.A.
xyzabcd012345098765
 
PDF
AHRP LB - The Regulatory Framework and Practice of Absentee Land in Indonesia...
AHRP Law Firm
 
PDF
Noah Michael Donato - A Certified Divemaster
Noah Michael
 
PDF
Dharmasthala Files (Investigative Report).pdf
rudreshk159
 
PPTX
Compensation acts(Maternity, Workmen's compensation, Gratuity, ESI).pptx
Sunaina44
 
PDF
VIETNAM – “NGUOI QUAN SAT” MAGAZINE INTERVIEWED DR OLIVER MASSMANN - THE FIRS...
Dr. Oliver Massmann
 
PPTX
Grant Of Patent application process.pptx
blossomjasmine085
 
PDF
4286820232025-07-21-611256.pdf Supreme Court
sabranghindi
 
PPTX
Case Law Presentations- Group Project-Brady vs Maryland.pptx
snyderjohn9247
 
PDF
Forestry Commission boss sues Dakyehene of New 88.3 FM, demands GH¢20 million...
Kweku Zurek
 
PPTX
OEC.pptxdddfffffffgsjjssuxjdjdussskddiixd
athulpopzz706
 
PPTX
Katarungang Pambarangay Presentation.pptx
MarkBalagat
 
DPT-3 Filing With ROC for Private Limited Companies
Kartik Verma
 
DR. GOSWAMI Forensic Justice - December 2024 - FINAL Full.pptx
AshutoshPandey331709
 
Military Unit symbols, vision and conclusion
antarikshdhaka
 
CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN 1956 by Shahzaman chandio
Shahzaman Chandio
 
Career Overview of James William Bain of Colorado
James William Bain
 
Delay of 19 years- Advocate Rohit Dandriyal order.pdf
chamberofadvrohitdan
 
Female Giggers' Discrimination - Dr. Yanki Hartijasti.pdf
sakshikothari33
 
Hands of the Land_ Rediscovering Heritage Through Rural Crafts by Jeffrey Kal...
Jeffrey Kaliel
 
STATUTE-130-Pg2000.pdf LEI MAGNITISKY U.S.A.
xyzabcd012345098765
 
AHRP LB - The Regulatory Framework and Practice of Absentee Land in Indonesia...
AHRP Law Firm
 
Noah Michael Donato - A Certified Divemaster
Noah Michael
 
Dharmasthala Files (Investigative Report).pdf
rudreshk159
 
Compensation acts(Maternity, Workmen's compensation, Gratuity, ESI).pptx
Sunaina44
 
VIETNAM – “NGUOI QUAN SAT” MAGAZINE INTERVIEWED DR OLIVER MASSMANN - THE FIRS...
Dr. Oliver Massmann
 
Grant Of Patent application process.pptx
blossomjasmine085
 
4286820232025-07-21-611256.pdf Supreme Court
sabranghindi
 
Case Law Presentations- Group Project-Brady vs Maryland.pptx
snyderjohn9247
 
Forestry Commission boss sues Dakyehene of New 88.3 FM, demands GH¢20 million...
Kweku Zurek
 
OEC.pptxdddfffffffgsjjssuxjdjdussskddiixd
athulpopzz706
 
Katarungang Pambarangay Presentation.pptx
MarkBalagat
 

Small Claims Track Checklist

  • 1. IPEC Small Claims Checklist Jane Lambert1 12 April 2017 1. Have you read the Guide to the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court Small Claims Track (“the Guide”), CPR Parts 27 and 63 and the Parts 27 and 63 Practice Directions? These are very important because they set out and explain the rules that the Court will apply to your case. They can be downloaded from the Ministry of Justice website.2 2. Can your case be brought in the IPEC Small Claims Track? Although para 4.3 of the Guide says that the Small Claims Track is only suitable for copyright, trade mark, passing off, unregistered design right and registered Community design cases, CPR 63.27 says that a claim may be started in, or transferred to, the Small Claims Track if CPR 63.13 applies but not CPR 62.2 and the value of the claim is not more than £10,000. CPR 63.13 refers to a much longer list in para 16.1 of the Part 63 Practice Direction and includes technical trade secrets, database rights and rights in performances as well as those listed in para 4.3 of the Guide. As para 1 of the Guide says: “Where there is any conflict or confusion between the provisions of this Guide and the CPR, you must follow the rules and practices as set out in the CPR” It would appear that the Guide is too restrictive. However, just because a case can be brought before the Small Claims track, it doesn’t mean it must be. You have to ask for the case to be 1 ​Barrister, 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square, London, WC1R 5AH, Tel 020 7404 5252, Email [email protected], http://nipclaw.blogspot.co.uk/p/profile.html 2 The Guide can be downloaded from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/a ttachment_data/file/426129/patents-court-small-claims.pdf and CPR Parts 27 and 63 and the Parts 27 and 63 Practiice Directions from http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules allocated to the Small Claims Track in your Particulars of Claim and the other side may object to your request. If he or she does object, the Court will decide whether the case is suitable for the Small Claims Track (see paragraph 9 below). 3. Have you sent the other side a letter before claim that complies with CPR 63.20 (2)? There are two traps here and you may need to consult a lawyer specializing in intellectual property law or a patent or trade mark attorney with the right 3 to conduct litigation to avoid them. The first of those traps is that the Practice Direction referred to by CPR 63.20 (2) no longer exists but CPR 63.20 (2) still requires compliance with it. The former Practice Direction gave detailed instructions as to what should be in a letter before claim and the evidence that should be contained in it. The second trap is that threatening certain types of intellectual property actions without justification can be actionable. In other words, the other side can sue you merely for threatening IP infringement proceedings in some circumstances. The laws on groundless threats are complex and not all lawyers understand them because there are no similar laws outside IP. That is why you may need specialist advice on that point. 4. Have you considered any Response by the Other Side? The other side may have spotted a flaw in your argument, produced evidence which is incompatible with your case or suggested talks or mediation to resolve the dispute. If they have done any of those things you have to consider their response and formulate an answer. Again, you have to be careful. If the Court thinks you have acted unreasonably by pressing on with a flawed claim in the face of a valid objection or squandering the opportunity for a fair settlement, it could penalize in several ways. 5. Have you drafted Particulars of Claim? Read paragraph 7.6 of the Guide very carefully. This is an important document and one for which you may need specialist counsel or a solicitor or a patent or trade mark attorney advocate. Your particulars of claim should identify the intellectual property right that you believe to have been infringed, state how it arises, explain how it has been infringed and set out the remedies you require and why you are entitled to them. If you claim 3 These would include barristers who are members of the Intellectual Property Bar Association or solicitors whose firms are members of the Intellectual Property Lawyers Association.
  • 2. money from the other side you must show how you have worked out your claim. You must limit your money claim to £10,000 in your Particulars of Claim. That is very important because the Small Claims Track cannot hear claims for more than that amount. You must also state whether you have complied with CPR 63.20 (2) which is mentioned in paragraph 2 above and ask for the case to be allocated to the Small Claims Track. 6. Have you issued your Claim Form properly? You need to download a claim form (Form N1) and the Notes for claimant on completing a claim form (Leaflet N1A) from HM Courts and Tribunals Service website or obtain them from a law stationer 4 or any County Court Office. You should read the leaflet and paragraph 7.2 of the Guide carefully and fill in the form as prescribed. You then post your claim form and particulars of claim with the correct fee to the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court at: The Rolls Building, 7 Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL. Alternatively, you can take those documents by hand to the public counter of the Rolls Building (nearest underground stations Chancery Lane and Temple). 7. Have you served the Claim Form and Particulars of Claim correctly? It is your job to serve the claim form and particulars of claim on the other side and not the Court’s. 5 Read CPR Part 6 and the Part 6 Practice Direction and paragraphs 7.3. 7.4 and 7.5 of the Guide very carefully. You must make sure that you include a response pack with sealed copies of the claim form and particulars of claim. If you do not do that the claim will not be served properly and the defendant can apply to set aside any orders or judgments that you may have obtained against him or her. 8. Has the Defendant responded in Time? Read paragraphs 7.5 and 7.7 of the Guide very carefully for the time limits and applying for judgment in default. If the 48 or, as the case may be, the 70-day time limit has expired and you have 4 http://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/HMCTS/FormFinder. do 5 We should now call him, her or it “the defendant”. not yet received his or her defence, check with the Court office as to whether they have received a defence. Sometimes, a defendant files a defence with the Court but does not serve it on the claimant. If the defendant has not filed and served a defence in time you can consider an application for a default judgment. 9. Does the Defendant object to the Case in the Small Claims Track? If the defendant objects to the Small Claims Track he or she can say so in the defence. There may be all sorts of good reasons why he or she objects. The case may involve a new or difficult point of law which should be decided by a Circuit or even a High Court judge. Or the defendant may believe that the claimant will have to drop the case if he or she risks costs on the Multitrack or High Court scale. Where one side wants the case to proceed in the Small Claims Track and the other side does not, the Court sends both sides a directions questionnaire and considers the parties’ responses. Sometimes the Court orders a hearing at this point. Transferring a case to the Multitrack leaves the Claimant with a difficult choice. Does he or she discontinue before the costs have mounted or is he or she sufficiently confident of the strengths of the claim to risk an adverse costs order? That is another issue upon which the Claimant may need to take specialist legal advice. 10. Have you complied with the Court’s Directions If the Defendant does not object to the Small Claims Track or the Court dismisses the Defendant’s objections, it will give directions for the further conduct of the case. Usually, it will give those directions without a hearing. These will include a timetable for the exchange of evidence and a date for the final hearing of the claim, unless the parties agree that the claim can be decided by without a hearing. Evidence will usually take the form of witness statements exhibiting the documents relied upon. Sometimes the parties are directed to exchange skeleton arguments. It is your job to comply with those directions punctually. 11. Are you and your Witnesses ready for the Final Hearing? Most hearings take place at the Royal Courts of Justice in the Strand. You should make sure that you arrive at the courtroom in good time with your witnesses and documents. ⃞