SOIL ANALYSIS
GROUP NO 2
GROUP MEMBERS
ATULINDA J RWEZAULA
ZAINAB RAJAB KHAMIS
HAJI IDDY MARIRI
OMARY ABAS OMARY
BRIAN WALELO
JIMMY M MWALINGO
AMOS MARWA
JACKSON J MWAMBONEKE
HAMIS YUSUPH
YUSUPH SAFARI
ESTER O MANWINGI
ANNUAR A MPANGAVO
ATHUMAN S ATHUMAN
MOISTURE CONTENT
 OBJECTIVES
To determine the amount of water present in a soil expressed as a percentage of
the mass of dry soil. This is termed the moisture content of the soil.
 REQUIRED EQUIPMENT
• A drying oven with temperature of 105°C to 110°C
• A balance readable to 0,1 g
• A metal container
• A desiccator
MOISTURE CONTENT
 TEST PROCEDURE
Step 1: A clean and dry the container was weighed as M₁
Step 2: A small amount of representative sample found after performing quartering
methods was placed in the container.
Step 3: The container with sample was immediately weighed as M₂, and placed in the
oven at 1050°C for 24 hours.
Step 4: After drying the container with sample was weighed as M₃
MOISTURE CONTENT
 TEST RESULTS
SPECIMEN REFERENCE
Mass of container (M1) g 42.6
Mass of wet soil +container (M2) g 163.1
Mass of dry soil + container (M3) g 155.5
Mass of moisture (M2-M3) g 7.6
Mass of dry soil (M3-M1) g 112.9
MOISTURE CONTENT
CALCULATIONS
From moisture content
𝑾 =
𝑴₂ − 𝑴₃
𝑴₃ − 𝑴₁
× 𝟏𝟎𝟎
Where:
M1 is the mass of the container alone in g
M2 is the mass of the container and wet soil in g
M3 is the mass of the container and dry soil in g
MOISTURE CONTENT
MOISTURE CONTENT =
𝑴𝟏−𝑴𝟐
𝑴𝟐−𝑴𝟑
𝒙 𝟏𝟎𝟎
=
𝟕.𝟔
𝟏𝟏𝟐.𝟗
𝒙 𝟏𝟎𝟎
= 6.73%.
CONCLUTION
Moisture content of the soil was found to be 6.73 %.
SIEVE ANALYSIS
 OBJECTIVES
a) To determine the percentage of different grain sizes contained within a soil sample
according to ASTM D422.Standard Test Method for Particle Size Analysis of Soils
b) To generate a semi-logarithmic plot that displays the particle size distribution of the
soil
c) To identify the grading of the soil using the data points on the graphs
SIEVE ANALYSIS
 REQUIREMENTS
 Test sieves: 4.75 mm, 3.35 mm, 2 mm, 1.18 mm, 0.6 mm, 0.425 mm, 0.3 mm, 0.212 mm,
0.15 mm, 0.075 mm.
 Lid and receiver
 Balance readable and accurate to 0.5 g
 Riffle boxes
 A drying oven at temperature between 105°C to 110°C
 Mechanical sieve shaker
 Cleaning Brush
 Metal trays (Evaporating dish)
 SAMPLE PREPARATION
A representative sample was obtained by quartering to give a minimum mass of about
404.9 g.
SIEVE ANALYSIS
 TEST PROCEDURE
 Step 1: A representative sample of about 404.9 g was put in an oven for 24hours.
 Step 2: After oven dry the sample was measured and found to be 372.9 g.
 Step 3: A sample of about 372.9 g was measured and taken for wet sieving.
 Step 4: The sample was spread in the large tray and covered with water for 15 min.
 Step 5: The sample was washed through 0.075 mm, allowing the materials passing sieve 0.075 mm to
run to waste.
 Step 6: The material retained on the sieve was transferred into the tray and dried in an oven for
24hours.
 Step 7: The dried sample was sieved through the appropriate sieves down to 0.075 mm.
 TEST PROCEDURE
Step 5: The sample was washed through 0.075 mm, allowing the materials passing sieve 0.075 mm to run to
waste.
Step 6: The material retained on the sieve was transferred into the tray and dried in an oven for 24hours.
Step 7: The dried sample was sieved through the appropriate sieves down to 0.075 mm.
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
Opening (mm) Mass
Retained
%Retain (100% (Mr
/Mt))
Cum Sum
(%Retained)
%Passing/
%Finer
4.75 0 0 0 100
3.35 0.2 0 0 100
2.00 1.0 0.2 0.2 99.8
1.18 11 2.2 2.4 97.6
0.6 144.6 29.6 32 68
0.425 91.3 18.7 50.7 49.3
0.3 117.6 24.0 74.7 25.3
0.212 38.8 7.9 82.6 17.4
o.15 47.7 9.8 92.4 7.6
0.063 36.8 7.5 99.9 0.1
Passing 0.3 0.1 100 0
TOTAL 489.3
PARTICLE DENSITY DETERMINATION
(SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF THE SOIL)
 OBJECTIVE
 Particle density essential especially in determination for calculating porosity and voids
and for computation of particle size analysis from a sedimentation procedure.
 Also, it is important when compaction and consolidation properties are considered
 REQUIRED EQUIPMENT
 50 mL density bottles (pycnometers) with stoppers.
 Constant temperature water bath.
 Vacuum desiccator.
 Vacuum pump and suitable rubber tubing.
 Drying oven capable of maintaining temperature of 105°C - 110°C.
 Distilled water in a wash bottle.
 Test sieve 2 mm.
 Balance readable to 0.01 g.
 Mortar and piston
 SAMPLE PREPARATION
 An oven-dried soil sample of about 100 g was prepared. Larger particles
shall be ground to pass a 2 mm sieve.
 TEST PROCEDURE
 i. density bottle with stopper was dried with a cloth and weighed to the nearest0.01 g
(m1).
 ii. The weight of the bottle with soil sample and stopper was recorded (m2)
 iii. A bottle without stopper was placed in the vacuum desiccator for at least one hour
until no further loss of air is apparent.
 iv. Bottle from the desiccator was removed and added air-free water until the bottle is
full.
 v. The stoppered bottle was taken out of the bath, wiped and dried carefully, and
weighed nearest 0.01 g (m3).
 vi. Fill it completely with air-free water, insert the stopper and immersed in constant
temperature water bath for 1 hour.
 vii. Taken the stoppered bottle out of the bath, carefully wipe it dry and weighed it to the
nearest 0.1 g (m4).
 𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒍𝒆 𝑫𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒚 =
𝑴₂−𝑴₁
𝑴₄−𝑴₁ −(𝑴₃−𝑴₂)
× 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎
 Where;
 M1 is the mass of density bottle (in g)
 M2 is the mass of bottle and dry soil (in g)
 M3 is the mass of bottle, soil and water (in g).
 M4 is the mass of bottle full of water only (in g).
 𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒍𝒆 𝑫𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒚 (𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄 𝑮𝒓𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒕𝒚) =
𝟐𝟔𝟖𝟓.𝟐+𝟐𝟓𝟖𝟏.𝟖+𝟐𝟔𝟖𝟓.𝟐
𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎 ×𝟑
 𝑮. 𝑺 = 𝟐. 𝟔𝟓
 CONCLUSION
 From specific gravity (GS) range (2.6 – 2.8)
 The soil sample tested in the laboratory seems to meet the range, as a result
of having specific gravity of 2.65. Hence the specific gravity test has been
performed well.
LIQUID LIMIT
 OBJECTIVE
 The method used to determine the liquid limit of a sample in its natural state during
when soil passes from liquid state to plastic state.
 The liquid limit provides a means of identifying and classifying fine grained cohesive
soil especially when also the plastic limit is known.
 REQUIREMENTS EQUIPMENT
 Test sieve of 0.425 mm.
 An airtight container
 A flat glass plates
 Two palette knives or spatulas A penetrometer gauge
 A cone of stainless steel,35 mm long having mass of 80g
 A metal cup of 55 mm in diameter and 40 mm deep with the rim parallel to the flat base
 A damp cloth or an evaporating dish
 A wash bottle containing clean water
 A metal straight edge
 A stop watch
 SAMPLE PREPARATION
 400g of soil sample which passed through 0.425 mm sieve was taken.
 Small amount of water was added to form a homogenous paste and left for 24hours.
 TEST PROCEDURES
 Step 1: 400g of soil sample was placed on the glass plate and mixed for 10min to a paste. More distilled water was added so that the first cone
penetrometer reading was about 15 mm.
 Step 2: A small amount of the paste was placed into the cup with a palette knife and excess soil was trimmed with the straightedge to give a smooth level
surface.
 Step 3: With penetration cone locked in the raised position, the cone was lowered so that it just touches the surface of the soil, and initial reading was
recorded.
 Step 4: The cone was released for about 4 to 6 seconds, and the dial gauge was lowered to contact the cone shaft and the first reading was recorded.
 Step 5: The cone was lifted and cleaned carefully.
 Step 6: A little more wet soil was added to the cup and the process was repeated just above 20mm penetration, and the difference between the first and
second penetration was maintained to the range of 0.5mm.
 Step 7: A small soil sample from each test was taken from the area penetrated by the cone for moisture content
MOISTURE CONTENT PENETRATION
22.6 14.6
23.7 18
25.6 21.3
26.1 23.7
 CALCULATIONS Since the liquid limit (LL) is obtained at 20mm cone
penetration. Then from the graph liquid limit (LL)
PLASTIC LIMIT AND PLASTICITY INDEX REPORT
 REQUIREMENTS
 Two flat glass plates, one for mixing soil and another for rolling threads.
 Two palette knives
 Apparatus for moisture content determination
 Clean water
 A length of rod, 3mm in diameter and 100 mm long.
 CALCULATION
 Moisture content (1) =
𝑴𝟐 −𝑴𝟑
𝑴𝟑 −𝑴𝟏
× 𝟏00%
 =
𝟒𝟒 −𝟒𝟏.𝟕
𝟒𝟏.𝟕 −𝟐𝟔.𝟓
× 𝟏𝟎𝟎%
 = 𝟏𝟓. 𝟏𝟑%

 Moisture Content (2) =
𝟒𝟔−𝟒𝟒.𝟐
𝟒𝟒.𝟐−𝟐𝟖.𝟔
× 𝟏𝟎𝟎%

 Plastic limit =
𝑾𝟏+𝑾𝟐
𝟐
 =
𝟏𝟓.𝟏𝟑+𝟏𝟏.𝟓𝟒
𝟐
 = 13.34%
 ACCORDING TO AASHTO
 A soil passing No.200 sieve is 2%, i.e., <35 % passing No.200.
 A soil is Granular soil.
SIEVE NO: % PASSING OF SOIL
No 10 (2.mm) 99.8
No.40 (0.425) 49.3
No.200 (0.075mm) 0.2
LL 24.8
PI 11.5

 FROM;
 GI= (F - 35) [0.2+0.005(LL - 40)] + 0.01(F - 15) (PI - 10)
 GI= (0.2 - 35) [0.2+0.005(24.8 - 40)] + 0.01(0.2 - 15) (11.5- 10)
 GI= 0.95 = 1
 Hence; GI = 1.
 A soil is A-2-6 (gravel and Sand).
 ACCORDING TO USCS
CONSTITUENT SOIL%
Percent of particles greater than 0.075 99.8
Gravel fraction 0
Sand fraction 99.8
Silt fraction 0.2
Clay fraction
 Because;
 50% of the particles are greater than 0.075 mm, a soil is coarse grains.
 A soil is SW (Well graded Sand).
LINEAR SHRINKAGE AND SHRINKAGE PRODUCT
REPORT
 OBJECTIVES
 To determine the total linear shrinkage value from linear measurement on a bar of a
soil of the fraction of soil sample passing through 0.425 mm test sieve.
 REQUIREMENTS
 A flat glass plates
 Two palette knives or spatulas
 A drying oven capable for maintain temperature 105 0 C to 1100 C
 Clean water
 A brass mould for linear shrinkage test VI. Tape measure
 SAMPLE PREPARATION
i. 200g of soil sample which passed through 0.425 mm sieve was taken.
ii. Small amount of water was added and mixed to form a homogenous paste and left for
24hours.

 TEST PROCEDURE
i. The Mould was cleaned thoroughly
ii. 200g of soil paste was taken at penetration of 20mm
iii. Soil was placed in a Mould such that it is slightly proud of the sides of the Mould and
soil leveled along the top of the Mould with a palette knife and all soil that adhering to
the rim of the Mould was removed. the Mould was placed for 24 hours to dry slowly
iv. the sample in the Mould was completed drying at 105 O C to 110 OC for 24 hours
v. Mould was cooled and mean length of the soil bar was measured
Specimen reference Units Weight
Initial length (LO) mm 140
Oven-dried length (LD) mm 128
TEST RESULTS
 CALCULATIONS
 Percentage of linear shrinkage = (1-
𝑳𝑫
𝑳𝑶
)×100%
 Where:
 LD is the length of the oven-dry specimen (mm)
 LO is the initial length of specimen (mm)
 Percentage of the linear shrinkage = 𝟏 −
𝟏𝟐𝟖
𝟏𝟒𝟎
×100%
 = 8.6 %
 Shrinkage product SP = LS ×% < 0.425 mm
 = 0.086 × 0.578
 = 0.0497
 8.6% is a percentage of linear shrinkage value, therefore the soil is plastic
COMPACTION TEST RESULT
 BS LIGHT & BS HEAVY
 OBJECTIVE
 the objective of this test was to obtain the relationship between compacted dry
density and soil moisture content, using two magnitudes of manual compacted effort.
The test was used to provide for specification on afield compaction
 the first was a light compaction test using a 2.5kg rammer (standard proctor test).
The second is a heavy compaction test using a 4.5kg rammer with greater drop on
thinner layer of soil (modified proctor test. for both test a compaction Mould of 1liter
internal volume is used for soil is used for which all particle a 20mm test sieve
 METHOD USED 2.5 Kg RAMMER (BS light)
 REQUIRED EQUIPMENT
 A cylindrical compaction Mould with internal diameter of 105mm and internal height of 115mm and volume of 1.0L (1000cm3)
 A metal rammer having a 50mm diameter circular face and weight of 2.5kg.the rammer shall be equipped with an arrangement for controlling the height of drop to 300mm
 A balance readable to 1gram
 Palette knives
 A straightedge example a steel strip.
 A 20mm and 37mm test sieves and receiver.
 A container suitable for mixing the quantity of material to be used.
 A waterproof container and scoop.
 A large metal trays.
 A measuring cylinder(200ml).
 A suitable tool for extracting specimen from Mould.
 Apparatus for moisture content determination.
 SAMPLE PREPARATION
 Five representative sample were prepared each of 3kg material passing through the
20mm test sieve. (For the use of 1L Mould).
 Each sample were thoroughly mixed with different amounts of water to give a suitable
range of moisture contents. The range of moisture contents shall be such that at least
2 values lie either side of the optimum moisture content.
 TEST PROCEDURE
i. The Mould with the base plate was weighed
ii. The extension collar was attached on to the Mould and then placed on a solid base
iii. A quantity of a moist soil was then placed in the Mould such that when compacted occupies a little of one-third of the height of the Mould
iv. Then a rammer with guide on to the material in the mound is placed. The rammer handle was lift until it reaches the top of the guide, then the
rammer handle was released freely onto the sample
v. The process was repeated systematically covering the entire surface of the sample. The total 27 blows were applied
vi. The rammer was then removed and then another layer of the sample was added to the Mould. the process was then repeated twice more by
applying 27blows to both second and third layer
vii. The soil and the Mould with the base plate attached was weighed
viii. The compacted sample from the Mould was removed and a representative sample of min300g of the soil for determination of the moisture
content
ix. The remainder sample were discarded
x. The whole process was carried out for all 5 portions of the sample
 COMPACTION ENERGY FOR STANDARD PROCTOR TEST

 E=
𝒎𝒈𝒉 𝑵𝒃 ×𝑵𝒍
𝑽

SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
 Where,
 M is the mass of the hammer 2.5 kg
 (g) is the acceleration due to gravity 9.8
 (h) is the height of fall of the hammer 300 mm
 Nb is the number of blows 27
 Nl is the number of layers 3
 V is the volume of compacted soil 0.942 × 10⁴mᶟ
 So;
 𝑬𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒚 =
𝟐.𝟓 ×𝟗.𝟖×𝟎.𝟑×𝟐𝟕×𝟑×𝟏𝟎¯ᶟ
𝟎.𝟗𝟒𝟐×𝟏𝟎¯ᶟ
 = 𝟔𝟑𝟐𝒌𝒋/𝒎ᶟ
DRY DENSITY MOISTURE CONTENT ZERO AIR VOID 5% 10%
1750.6 2.3 2542.1 2415 2287.9
1782.6 4.3 2419.1 2298.2 2177.2
1911.4 7.4 2250.4 2137.9 2025.3
1943.6 10.3 2112.5 2006.9 1901.3
1930.6 12 2039.3 1937.3 1835.3
1848.4 14.3 1947.9 1850.5 1753.1
1798.2 16 1885.5 1791.2 1696.9
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES
SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION  AND CATEGORIES

More Related Content

PPTX
SOIL ANALYSIS for all types of soils levels
DOCX
Ex 1 water content by oven dry method
DOCX
SUMMER TRAINING REPORTS OF SOIL TESTING
PPTX
Index properties
DOCX
Summer training report on soil testing experiments
PDF
CT-233 SOIL MECHANICS LAB MANUAL BSC Civil
PPTX
index properties.pptx of soil in geo technical engineering
DOCX
Ex 2 water content by calcium carbide method
SOIL ANALYSIS for all types of soils levels
Ex 1 water content by oven dry method
SUMMER TRAINING REPORTS OF SOIL TESTING
Index properties
Summer training report on soil testing experiments
CT-233 SOIL MECHANICS LAB MANUAL BSC Civil
index properties.pptx of soil in geo technical engineering
Ex 2 water content by calcium carbide method

Similar to SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION AND CATEGORIES (20)

PDF
ALL PRACTICALS of construction material
PPTX
METHODOLOGIES AND IMPORTANCE OF FIELD AND LAB TESTS.
PPTX
Soil Enginnering.pptx
DOCX
soil classification lab
PPTX
Summer training ppt
PPTX
Geotechnical Engineering lab project.pptx
PPTX
Site Investigation and Example of Soil Sampling
PPTX
Oedometer test
PPTX
Group ppt on Mechanical Analysis of Soil
PDF
Quality Control of material Test book.pdf
DOCX
DocScanner Nov 3, 2022 1-55 PM.docx
PPT
Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02
DOCX
Grain size analysis of soil by sieve and hydrometer
PPTX
INDEX PROPERTIES OF SOIL
PDF
IRJET - Experimental Study on Properties of Soil
PPTX
Sieve & Hydrometer Analysis
PDF
Ge lab manual
PPTX
Exp01.pptx
PPTX
Quality tests for aggregates and concrete mix design
PDF
Particle technology lab report
ALL PRACTICALS of construction material
METHODOLOGIES AND IMPORTANCE OF FIELD AND LAB TESTS.
Soil Enginnering.pptx
soil classification lab
Summer training ppt
Geotechnical Engineering lab project.pptx
Site Investigation and Example of Soil Sampling
Oedometer test
Group ppt on Mechanical Analysis of Soil
Quality Control of material Test book.pdf
DocScanner Nov 3, 2022 1-55 PM.docx
Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02
Grain size analysis of soil by sieve and hydrometer
INDEX PROPERTIES OF SOIL
IRJET - Experimental Study on Properties of Soil
Sieve & Hydrometer Analysis
Ge lab manual
Exp01.pptx
Quality tests for aggregates and concrete mix design
Particle technology lab report
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
ITEC 1010 - Networks and Cloud Computing
PPTX
Unit IILATHEACCESSORSANDATTACHMENTS.pptx
PPT
Basics Of Pump types, Details, and working principles.
PPTX
operating system Module 5 Secondary storage
PPTX
Module 1 – Introduction to Computer Networks: Foundations of Data Communicati...
PDF
THE PEDAGOGICAL NEXUS IN TEACHING ELECTRICITY CONCEPTS IN THE GRADE 9 NATURAL...
PPTX
Unit I - Mechatronics.pptx presentation
PPTX
240409 Data Center Training Programs by Uptime Institute (Drafting).pptx
PDF
The Journal of Finance - July 1993 - JENSEN - The Modern Industrial Revolutio...
PPT
Unit - I.lathemachnespct=ificationsand ppt
PPTX
non conventional energy resorses material unit-1
PDF
AI agent, robotics based Smart Construction 2025
PDF
Human CELLS and structure in Anatomy and human physiology
PDF
CB Công Nghiệp Slide .dh bách khoa đà nẵng
PDF
IoT-Based Hybrid Renewable Energy System.pdf
PDF
Software defined netwoks is useful to learn NFV and virtual Lans
PPT
Module_1_Lecture_1_Introduction_To_Automation_In_Production_Systems2023.ppt
PDF
Water Industry Process Automation & Control Monthly - September 2025
PPTX
MODULE 3 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALSPPT.pptx
PDF
02. INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION & Cultural, Technical and territorial transformatio...
ITEC 1010 - Networks and Cloud Computing
Unit IILATHEACCESSORSANDATTACHMENTS.pptx
Basics Of Pump types, Details, and working principles.
operating system Module 5 Secondary storage
Module 1 – Introduction to Computer Networks: Foundations of Data Communicati...
THE PEDAGOGICAL NEXUS IN TEACHING ELECTRICITY CONCEPTS IN THE GRADE 9 NATURAL...
Unit I - Mechatronics.pptx presentation
240409 Data Center Training Programs by Uptime Institute (Drafting).pptx
The Journal of Finance - July 1993 - JENSEN - The Modern Industrial Revolutio...
Unit - I.lathemachnespct=ificationsand ppt
non conventional energy resorses material unit-1
AI agent, robotics based Smart Construction 2025
Human CELLS and structure in Anatomy and human physiology
CB Công Nghiệp Slide .dh bách khoa đà nẵng
IoT-Based Hybrid Renewable Energy System.pdf
Software defined netwoks is useful to learn NFV and virtual Lans
Module_1_Lecture_1_Introduction_To_Automation_In_Production_Systems2023.ppt
Water Industry Process Automation & Control Monthly - September 2025
MODULE 3 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALSPPT.pptx
02. INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION & Cultural, Technical and territorial transformatio...
Ad

SOIL ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION AND CATEGORIES

  • 2. GROUP MEMBERS ATULINDA J RWEZAULA ZAINAB RAJAB KHAMIS HAJI IDDY MARIRI OMARY ABAS OMARY BRIAN WALELO JIMMY M MWALINGO AMOS MARWA JACKSON J MWAMBONEKE HAMIS YUSUPH YUSUPH SAFARI ESTER O MANWINGI ANNUAR A MPANGAVO ATHUMAN S ATHUMAN
  • 3. MOISTURE CONTENT  OBJECTIVES To determine the amount of water present in a soil expressed as a percentage of the mass of dry soil. This is termed the moisture content of the soil.  REQUIRED EQUIPMENT • A drying oven with temperature of 105°C to 110°C • A balance readable to 0,1 g • A metal container • A desiccator
  • 4. MOISTURE CONTENT  TEST PROCEDURE Step 1: A clean and dry the container was weighed as M₁ Step 2: A small amount of representative sample found after performing quartering methods was placed in the container. Step 3: The container with sample was immediately weighed as M₂, and placed in the oven at 1050°C for 24 hours. Step 4: After drying the container with sample was weighed as M₃
  • 5. MOISTURE CONTENT  TEST RESULTS SPECIMEN REFERENCE Mass of container (M1) g 42.6 Mass of wet soil +container (M2) g 163.1 Mass of dry soil + container (M3) g 155.5 Mass of moisture (M2-M3) g 7.6 Mass of dry soil (M3-M1) g 112.9
  • 6. MOISTURE CONTENT CALCULATIONS From moisture content 𝑾 = 𝑴₂ − 𝑴₃ 𝑴₃ − 𝑴₁ × 𝟏𝟎𝟎 Where: M1 is the mass of the container alone in g M2 is the mass of the container and wet soil in g M3 is the mass of the container and dry soil in g
  • 7. MOISTURE CONTENT MOISTURE CONTENT = 𝑴𝟏−𝑴𝟐 𝑴𝟐−𝑴𝟑 𝒙 𝟏𝟎𝟎 = 𝟕.𝟔 𝟏𝟏𝟐.𝟗 𝒙 𝟏𝟎𝟎 = 6.73%. CONCLUTION Moisture content of the soil was found to be 6.73 %.
  • 8. SIEVE ANALYSIS  OBJECTIVES a) To determine the percentage of different grain sizes contained within a soil sample according to ASTM D422.Standard Test Method for Particle Size Analysis of Soils b) To generate a semi-logarithmic plot that displays the particle size distribution of the soil c) To identify the grading of the soil using the data points on the graphs
  • 9. SIEVE ANALYSIS  REQUIREMENTS  Test sieves: 4.75 mm, 3.35 mm, 2 mm, 1.18 mm, 0.6 mm, 0.425 mm, 0.3 mm, 0.212 mm, 0.15 mm, 0.075 mm.  Lid and receiver  Balance readable and accurate to 0.5 g  Riffle boxes  A drying oven at temperature between 105°C to 110°C  Mechanical sieve shaker  Cleaning Brush  Metal trays (Evaporating dish)
  • 10.  SAMPLE PREPARATION A representative sample was obtained by quartering to give a minimum mass of about 404.9 g.
  • 11. SIEVE ANALYSIS  TEST PROCEDURE  Step 1: A representative sample of about 404.9 g was put in an oven for 24hours.  Step 2: After oven dry the sample was measured and found to be 372.9 g.  Step 3: A sample of about 372.9 g was measured and taken for wet sieving.  Step 4: The sample was spread in the large tray and covered with water for 15 min.  Step 5: The sample was washed through 0.075 mm, allowing the materials passing sieve 0.075 mm to run to waste.  Step 6: The material retained on the sieve was transferred into the tray and dried in an oven for 24hours.  Step 7: The dried sample was sieved through the appropriate sieves down to 0.075 mm.
  • 12.  TEST PROCEDURE Step 5: The sample was washed through 0.075 mm, allowing the materials passing sieve 0.075 mm to run to waste. Step 6: The material retained on the sieve was transferred into the tray and dried in an oven for 24hours. Step 7: The dried sample was sieved through the appropriate sieves down to 0.075 mm.
  • 14. Opening (mm) Mass Retained %Retain (100% (Mr /Mt)) Cum Sum (%Retained) %Passing/ %Finer 4.75 0 0 0 100 3.35 0.2 0 0 100 2.00 1.0 0.2 0.2 99.8 1.18 11 2.2 2.4 97.6 0.6 144.6 29.6 32 68 0.425 91.3 18.7 50.7 49.3 0.3 117.6 24.0 74.7 25.3 0.212 38.8 7.9 82.6 17.4 o.15 47.7 9.8 92.4 7.6 0.063 36.8 7.5 99.9 0.1 Passing 0.3 0.1 100 0 TOTAL 489.3
  • 15. PARTICLE DENSITY DETERMINATION (SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF THE SOIL)  OBJECTIVE  Particle density essential especially in determination for calculating porosity and voids and for computation of particle size analysis from a sedimentation procedure.  Also, it is important when compaction and consolidation properties are considered
  • 16.  REQUIRED EQUIPMENT  50 mL density bottles (pycnometers) with stoppers.  Constant temperature water bath.  Vacuum desiccator.  Vacuum pump and suitable rubber tubing.  Drying oven capable of maintaining temperature of 105°C - 110°C.  Distilled water in a wash bottle.  Test sieve 2 mm.  Balance readable to 0.01 g.  Mortar and piston
  • 17.  SAMPLE PREPARATION  An oven-dried soil sample of about 100 g was prepared. Larger particles shall be ground to pass a 2 mm sieve.
  • 18.  TEST PROCEDURE  i. density bottle with stopper was dried with a cloth and weighed to the nearest0.01 g (m1).  ii. The weight of the bottle with soil sample and stopper was recorded (m2)  iii. A bottle without stopper was placed in the vacuum desiccator for at least one hour until no further loss of air is apparent.  iv. Bottle from the desiccator was removed and added air-free water until the bottle is full.  v. The stoppered bottle was taken out of the bath, wiped and dried carefully, and weighed nearest 0.01 g (m3).  vi. Fill it completely with air-free water, insert the stopper and immersed in constant temperature water bath for 1 hour.  vii. Taken the stoppered bottle out of the bath, carefully wipe it dry and weighed it to the nearest 0.1 g (m4).
  • 19.  𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒍𝒆 𝑫𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒚 = 𝑴₂−𝑴₁ 𝑴₄−𝑴₁ −(𝑴₃−𝑴₂) × 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎  Where;  M1 is the mass of density bottle (in g)  M2 is the mass of bottle and dry soil (in g)  M3 is the mass of bottle, soil and water (in g).  M4 is the mass of bottle full of water only (in g).  𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒍𝒆 𝑫𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒚 (𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄 𝑮𝒓𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒕𝒚) = 𝟐𝟔𝟖𝟓.𝟐+𝟐𝟓𝟖𝟏.𝟖+𝟐𝟔𝟖𝟓.𝟐 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎 ×𝟑  𝑮. 𝑺 = 𝟐. 𝟔𝟓
  • 20.  CONCLUSION  From specific gravity (GS) range (2.6 – 2.8)  The soil sample tested in the laboratory seems to meet the range, as a result of having specific gravity of 2.65. Hence the specific gravity test has been performed well.
  • 21. LIQUID LIMIT  OBJECTIVE  The method used to determine the liquid limit of a sample in its natural state during when soil passes from liquid state to plastic state.  The liquid limit provides a means of identifying and classifying fine grained cohesive soil especially when also the plastic limit is known.
  • 22.  REQUIREMENTS EQUIPMENT  Test sieve of 0.425 mm.  An airtight container  A flat glass plates  Two palette knives or spatulas A penetrometer gauge  A cone of stainless steel,35 mm long having mass of 80g  A metal cup of 55 mm in diameter and 40 mm deep with the rim parallel to the flat base  A damp cloth or an evaporating dish  A wash bottle containing clean water  A metal straight edge  A stop watch
  • 23.  SAMPLE PREPARATION  400g of soil sample which passed through 0.425 mm sieve was taken.  Small amount of water was added to form a homogenous paste and left for 24hours.
  • 24.  TEST PROCEDURES  Step 1: 400g of soil sample was placed on the glass plate and mixed for 10min to a paste. More distilled water was added so that the first cone penetrometer reading was about 15 mm.  Step 2: A small amount of the paste was placed into the cup with a palette knife and excess soil was trimmed with the straightedge to give a smooth level surface.  Step 3: With penetration cone locked in the raised position, the cone was lowered so that it just touches the surface of the soil, and initial reading was recorded.  Step 4: The cone was released for about 4 to 6 seconds, and the dial gauge was lowered to contact the cone shaft and the first reading was recorded.  Step 5: The cone was lifted and cleaned carefully.  Step 6: A little more wet soil was added to the cup and the process was repeated just above 20mm penetration, and the difference between the first and second penetration was maintained to the range of 0.5mm.  Step 7: A small soil sample from each test was taken from the area penetrated by the cone for moisture content
  • 25. MOISTURE CONTENT PENETRATION 22.6 14.6 23.7 18 25.6 21.3 26.1 23.7
  • 26.  CALCULATIONS Since the liquid limit (LL) is obtained at 20mm cone penetration. Then from the graph liquid limit (LL)
  • 27. PLASTIC LIMIT AND PLASTICITY INDEX REPORT  REQUIREMENTS  Two flat glass plates, one for mixing soil and another for rolling threads.  Two palette knives  Apparatus for moisture content determination  Clean water  A length of rod, 3mm in diameter and 100 mm long.
  • 28.  CALCULATION  Moisture content (1) = 𝑴𝟐 −𝑴𝟑 𝑴𝟑 −𝑴𝟏 × 𝟏00%  = 𝟒𝟒 −𝟒𝟏.𝟕 𝟒𝟏.𝟕 −𝟐𝟔.𝟓 × 𝟏𝟎𝟎%  = 𝟏𝟓. 𝟏𝟑%   Moisture Content (2) = 𝟒𝟔−𝟒𝟒.𝟐 𝟒𝟒.𝟐−𝟐𝟖.𝟔 × 𝟏𝟎𝟎%
  • 29.   Plastic limit = 𝑾𝟏+𝑾𝟐 𝟐  = 𝟏𝟓.𝟏𝟑+𝟏𝟏.𝟓𝟒 𝟐  = 13.34%
  • 30.  ACCORDING TO AASHTO  A soil passing No.200 sieve is 2%, i.e., <35 % passing No.200.  A soil is Granular soil. SIEVE NO: % PASSING OF SOIL No 10 (2.mm) 99.8 No.40 (0.425) 49.3 No.200 (0.075mm) 0.2 LL 24.8 PI 11.5
  • 31.   FROM;  GI= (F - 35) [0.2+0.005(LL - 40)] + 0.01(F - 15) (PI - 10)  GI= (0.2 - 35) [0.2+0.005(24.8 - 40)] + 0.01(0.2 - 15) (11.5- 10)  GI= 0.95 = 1  Hence; GI = 1.  A soil is A-2-6 (gravel and Sand).
  • 32.  ACCORDING TO USCS CONSTITUENT SOIL% Percent of particles greater than 0.075 99.8 Gravel fraction 0 Sand fraction 99.8 Silt fraction 0.2 Clay fraction
  • 33.  Because;  50% of the particles are greater than 0.075 mm, a soil is coarse grains.  A soil is SW (Well graded Sand).
  • 34. LINEAR SHRINKAGE AND SHRINKAGE PRODUCT REPORT  OBJECTIVES  To determine the total linear shrinkage value from linear measurement on a bar of a soil of the fraction of soil sample passing through 0.425 mm test sieve.
  • 35.  REQUIREMENTS  A flat glass plates  Two palette knives or spatulas  A drying oven capable for maintain temperature 105 0 C to 1100 C  Clean water  A brass mould for linear shrinkage test VI. Tape measure
  • 36.  SAMPLE PREPARATION i. 200g of soil sample which passed through 0.425 mm sieve was taken. ii. Small amount of water was added and mixed to form a homogenous paste and left for 24hours. 
  • 37.  TEST PROCEDURE i. The Mould was cleaned thoroughly ii. 200g of soil paste was taken at penetration of 20mm iii. Soil was placed in a Mould such that it is slightly proud of the sides of the Mould and soil leveled along the top of the Mould with a palette knife and all soil that adhering to the rim of the Mould was removed. the Mould was placed for 24 hours to dry slowly iv. the sample in the Mould was completed drying at 105 O C to 110 OC for 24 hours v. Mould was cooled and mean length of the soil bar was measured
  • 38. Specimen reference Units Weight Initial length (LO) mm 140 Oven-dried length (LD) mm 128 TEST RESULTS
  • 39.  CALCULATIONS  Percentage of linear shrinkage = (1- 𝑳𝑫 𝑳𝑶 )×100%  Where:  LD is the length of the oven-dry specimen (mm)  LO is the initial length of specimen (mm)
  • 40.  Percentage of the linear shrinkage = 𝟏 − 𝟏𝟐𝟖 𝟏𝟒𝟎 ×100%  = 8.6 %  Shrinkage product SP = LS ×% < 0.425 mm  = 0.086 × 0.578  = 0.0497  8.6% is a percentage of linear shrinkage value, therefore the soil is plastic
  • 41. COMPACTION TEST RESULT  BS LIGHT & BS HEAVY  OBJECTIVE  the objective of this test was to obtain the relationship between compacted dry density and soil moisture content, using two magnitudes of manual compacted effort. The test was used to provide for specification on afield compaction  the first was a light compaction test using a 2.5kg rammer (standard proctor test). The second is a heavy compaction test using a 4.5kg rammer with greater drop on thinner layer of soil (modified proctor test. for both test a compaction Mould of 1liter internal volume is used for soil is used for which all particle a 20mm test sieve
  • 42.  METHOD USED 2.5 Kg RAMMER (BS light)  REQUIRED EQUIPMENT  A cylindrical compaction Mould with internal diameter of 105mm and internal height of 115mm and volume of 1.0L (1000cm3)  A metal rammer having a 50mm diameter circular face and weight of 2.5kg.the rammer shall be equipped with an arrangement for controlling the height of drop to 300mm  A balance readable to 1gram  Palette knives  A straightedge example a steel strip.  A 20mm and 37mm test sieves and receiver.  A container suitable for mixing the quantity of material to be used.  A waterproof container and scoop.  A large metal trays.  A measuring cylinder(200ml).  A suitable tool for extracting specimen from Mould.  Apparatus for moisture content determination.
  • 43.  SAMPLE PREPARATION  Five representative sample were prepared each of 3kg material passing through the 20mm test sieve. (For the use of 1L Mould).  Each sample were thoroughly mixed with different amounts of water to give a suitable range of moisture contents. The range of moisture contents shall be such that at least 2 values lie either side of the optimum moisture content.
  • 44.  TEST PROCEDURE i. The Mould with the base plate was weighed ii. The extension collar was attached on to the Mould and then placed on a solid base iii. A quantity of a moist soil was then placed in the Mould such that when compacted occupies a little of one-third of the height of the Mould iv. Then a rammer with guide on to the material in the mound is placed. The rammer handle was lift until it reaches the top of the guide, then the rammer handle was released freely onto the sample v. The process was repeated systematically covering the entire surface of the sample. The total 27 blows were applied vi. The rammer was then removed and then another layer of the sample was added to the Mould. the process was then repeated twice more by applying 27blows to both second and third layer vii. The soil and the Mould with the base plate attached was weighed viii. The compacted sample from the Mould was removed and a representative sample of min300g of the soil for determination of the moisture content ix. The remainder sample were discarded x. The whole process was carried out for all 5 portions of the sample
  • 45.  COMPACTION ENERGY FOR STANDARD PROCTOR TEST   E= 𝒎𝒈𝒉 𝑵𝒃 ×𝑵𝒍 𝑽 
  • 47.  Where,  M is the mass of the hammer 2.5 kg  (g) is the acceleration due to gravity 9.8  (h) is the height of fall of the hammer 300 mm  Nb is the number of blows 27  Nl is the number of layers 3  V is the volume of compacted soil 0.942 × 10⁴mᶟ  So;
  • 48.  𝑬𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒚 = 𝟐.𝟓 ×𝟗.𝟖×𝟎.𝟑×𝟐𝟕×𝟑×𝟏𝟎¯ᶟ 𝟎.𝟗𝟒𝟐×𝟏𝟎¯ᶟ  = 𝟔𝟑𝟐𝒌𝒋/𝒎ᶟ
  • 49. DRY DENSITY MOISTURE CONTENT ZERO AIR VOID 5% 10% 1750.6 2.3 2542.1 2415 2287.9 1782.6 4.3 2419.1 2298.2 2177.2 1911.4 7.4 2250.4 2137.9 2025.3 1943.6 10.3 2112.5 2006.9 1901.3 1930.6 12 2039.3 1937.3 1835.3 1848.4 14.3 1947.9 1850.5 1753.1 1798.2 16 1885.5 1791.2 1696.9