SlideShare a Scribd company logo
source code quality
Alberto Simões
March 10, 2015 – ESEIG-IPP – Vila do Conde
Departamento de Informática
Universidade do Minho
outline
Motivation
Code Structure
Code Documentation
Testing
1
motivation
no bad code initiative
3
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
4
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
∙ Code should document itself;
4
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
∙ Code should document itself;
∙ Code should be easy to read;
4
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
∙ Code should document itself;
∙ Code should be easy to read;
∙ Code should be elegant!
4
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
∙ Code should document itself;
∙ Code should be easy to read;
∙ Code should be elegant!
∙ Documentation Issues;
4
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
∙ Code should document itself;
∙ Code should be easy to read;
∙ Code should be elegant!
∙ Documentation Issues;
∙ Documentation should exist;
4
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
∙ Code should document itself;
∙ Code should be easy to read;
∙ Code should be elegant!
∙ Documentation Issues;
∙ Documentation should exist;
∙ Documentation should follow standards;
4
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
∙ Code should document itself;
∙ Code should be easy to read;
∙ Code should be elegant!
∙ Documentation Issues;
∙ Documentation should exist;
∙ Documentation should follow standards;
∙ Documentation should document!
4
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
∙ Code should document itself;
∙ Code should be easy to read;
∙ Code should be elegant!
∙ Documentation Issues;
∙ Documentation should exist;
∙ Documentation should follow standards;
∙ Documentation should document!
∙ Testing Issues;
4
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
∙ Code should document itself;
∙ Code should be easy to read;
∙ Code should be elegant!
∙ Documentation Issues;
∙ Documentation should exist;
∙ Documentation should follow standards;
∙ Documentation should document!
∙ Testing Issues;
∙ Code should work on correct input;
4
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
∙ Code should document itself;
∙ Code should be easy to read;
∙ Code should be elegant!
∙ Documentation Issues;
∙ Documentation should exist;
∙ Documentation should follow standards;
∙ Documentation should document!
∙ Testing Issues;
∙ Code should work on correct input;
∙ Code should work on incorrect input;
4
code problems
∙ Legibility Issues;
∙ Code should document itself;
∙ Code should be easy to read;
∙ Code should be elegant!
∙ Documentation Issues;
∙ Documentation should exist;
∙ Documentation should follow standards;
∙ Documentation should document!
∙ Testing Issues;
∙ Code should work on correct input;
∙ Code should work on incorrect input;
∙ Code should be tested on every change!
4
code structure
code structure
6
use meaningful identifiers
What does this code do?
int x(string g[]) {
string p = g[0]; int o = p.length();
for (z=1;z<g.length;++z) {
if (g[z].length()>o) { p=g[z];o=p.length(); }
}
return o;
}
7
use meaningful identifiers
Is this better?
int x(string list[]) {
string maxString = list[0];
int maxSize = maxString.length();
for (i=1;i<list.length;++i) {
if (list[i].length()>maxSize) { maxString=list[i];
maxSize=maxString.length(); }
}
return maxSize;
}
8
use coherent indentation
Do you prefer this…
int x(string list[]) {
string maxString = list[0];
int maxSize = maxString.length();
for (i=1;i<list.length;++i) {
if (list[i].length()>maxSize) { maxString=list[i];
maxSize=maxString.length(); }
}
return maxSize;
}
9
use coherent indentation
or this?
int x(string list[]) {
string maxString = list[0];
int maxSize = maxString.length();
for (i=1;i<list.length;++i) {
if (list[i].length()>maxSize) {
maxString=list[i];
maxSize=maxString.length();
}
}
return maxSize;
}
10
use coherent identifiers
int x(string Lists[]) {
string max_String = Lista[0];
int maxSize = max_String.length();
for (i=1;i<Lista.length;++i) {
if (Lista[i].length()>maxSize) {
max_String=Lista[i];
maxSize=max_String.length();
}
}
return maxSize;
}
11
use coherent identifiers
Choose:
∙ One language:
I prefer English given keywords are English, but any will work!
12
use coherent identifiers
Choose:
∙ One language:
I prefer English given keywords are English, but any will work!
∙ Use one variable style:
If you prefer use CamelCaseIdentifiers;
Or, why not, underscores_identifiers;
but not both!
12
use coherent identifiers
Choose:
∙ One language:
I prefer English given keywords are English, but any will work!
∙ Use one variable style:
If you prefer use CamelCaseIdentifiers;
Or, why not, underscores_identifiers;
but not both!
∙ Note that some languages have conventions:
Java libraries use CamelCase;
GNU Toolkit (GTK+) use underscores;
So, probably a good idea to follow the flow…
12
use standard code structure
Does this work?
int x(string list[]) {
; string maxString = list[0]
; int maxSize = maxString.length()
; for (i=1;i<list.length;++i)
if (list[i].length()>maxSize) {
; maxString=list[i]
; maxSize=maxString.length()
; }
; return maxSize
; }
Isn’t it cute?
13
use standard and coherent code structure
Choose one, but stick to it!
int x(string list[]) {
string maxString = list[0];
int maxSize = maxString.length();
for (i=1;i<list.length;++i)
if (list[i].length()>maxSize) {
maxString=list[i];
maxSize=maxString.length();
}
return maxSize;
}
int x(string list[])
{
string maxString = list[0];
int maxSize = maxString.length();
for (i=1;i<list.length;++i)
if (list[i].length()>maxSize)
{
maxString=list[i];
maxSize=maxString.length();
}
return maxSize;
}
14
use vertical alignment
Most editors suck and mess with vertical alignment.
Nevertheless, it is useful.
See the error?
Sprite tank=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/tank.png”);
Sprite chopper=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprtes/chopper.png”);
Sprite balloons=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/balloons.png”);
15
use vertical alignment
Most editors suck and mess with vertical alignment.
Nevertheless, it is useful.
See the error?
Sprite tank=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/tank.png”);
Sprite chopper=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprtes/chopper.png”);
Sprite balloons=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/balloons.png”);
And now?
Sprite tank = LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/tank.png”);
Sprite chopper = LoadSprite(”path/to/sprtes/chopper.png”);
Sprite balloons = LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/balloons.png”);
15
be explicit
C, Java and C# are tolerant, so you can write
if (foo < bar)
do_something(foo, bar);
Look, m’a! No curly brackets!
16
be explicit
C, Java and C# are tolerant, so you can write
if (foo < bar)
do_something(foo, bar);
Look, m’a! No curly brackets!
Problem? Later you might need to add an action and probably you
will add it like this:
if (foo < bar)
do_something(foo, bar);
do_something_else(foo, bar);
And does that do what you mean?
16
be explicit ii
So, how do you read this?
if (a < b)
if (b < c)
a = c;
else
c = b;
Or, more important, how does the compiler read it?
17
be explicit ii
So, how do you read this?
if (a < b)
if (b < c)
a = c;
else
c = b;
Or, more important, how does the compiler read it?
if (a < b)
if (b < c)
a = c;
else
c = b;
if (a < b)
if (b < c)
a = c;
else
c = b;
17
be explicit ii
Better with curly brackets!
if (a < b) {
if (b < c) {
a = c;
}
}
else {
c = b;
}
if (a < b) {
if (b < c) {
a = c;
}
else {
c = b;
}
}
Even without indentation you can understand it properly!!
And better! You do not need to know how the compiler interprets it.
18
use proper data structures
Implement related data as a data structure.
So, in pacman we have four ghosts. Store their positions.
int g1x, g1y, g2x, g2y, g3x, g3y, g4x, g4y;
19
use proper data structures
Implement related data as a data structure.
So, in pacman we have four ghosts. Store their positions.
int g1x, g1y, g2x, g2y, g3x, g3y, g4x, g4y;
There are only four, right? And it works!
19
use proper data structures
Implement related data as a data structure.
So, in pacman we have four ghosts. Store their positions.
int g1x, g1y, g2x, g2y, g3x, g3y, g4x, g4y;
There are only four, right? And it works!
Probably better:
class Pair { public int x, y; };
Pair[] ghost = new Pair[4];
// now use ghost[0].x, ghost[1].y, etc
19
code documentation
documentation
21
should it exist?
Real programmers don’t comment their code,
if it was hard to write,
it should be hard to understand and harder to modify.
— unknown
22
should it exist?
Real programmers don’t comment their code,
if it was hard to write,
it should be hard to understand and harder to modify.
— unknown
Kidding. It should really exist!
22
is this documentation?
/* Computes the length of the longer string */
int LongestString(string list[])
{
string maxString = list[0];
int maxSize = maxString.length();
for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) {
if (list[i].length() > maxSize) {
maxString = list[i];
maxSize = maxString.length();
}
}
return maxSize;
}
23
is this documentation?
/* Computes the length of the longer string */
int LongestString(string list[])
{
string maxString = list[0];
int maxSize = maxString.length();
for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) {
if (list[i].length() > maxSize) {
maxString = list[i];
maxSize = maxString.length();
}
}
return maxSize;
}
Not really!
23
documentation relevance
Documentation is like sex:
when it is good, it is very, very good;
and when it is bad, it is better than nothing.
— Dick Brandon (?)
24
documentation content
Try to include:
∙ What the code is about;
∙ What are each of the input arguments/parameters;
∙ What is the type and content of the returned value;
∙ If any of the method/function parameters are for output;
∙ What restrictions does the input values have?
∙ What happens when you do not follow that restriction?
∙ What exceptions are thrown directy?
∙ What exceptions are not catched and might be propagated?
∙ What is the algorithm?
25
use standards
Most programming languages have a standard documentation
approach:
∙ Perl has POD;
∙ Java has JavaDoc;
∙ Haskell has Hadock;
∙ C# has “XML Comments”;
∙ Python has Sphinx;
∙ C has Doxygen;
∙ C++ has Doxygen too;
∙ Lots of cross-language tools;
26
example: javadoc
/**
* Given an array of strings, compute the length of the
* longest string.
* <p>
* This method will not work for empty lists.
*
* @param list the list of strings to be processed;
* @return the size of the longest string
* in the array;
*/
int LongestString(string list[])
{
string maxString = list[0];
int maxSize = maxString.length();
for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) {
[...]
27
testing
testing
29
does this work?
int LongestString(string list[])
{
string maxString = list[0];
int maxSize = maxString.length();
for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) {
if (list[i].length() > maxSize) {
maxString = list[i];
maxSize = maxString.length();
}
}
return maxSize;
}
30
does this work?
int LongestString(string list[])
{
string maxString = list[0];
int maxSize = maxString.length();
for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) {
if (list[i].length() > maxSize) {
maxString = list[i];
maxSize = maxString.length();
}
}
return maxSize;
}
Always!?
30
does this work?
int LongestString(string list[])
{
string maxString = list[0];
int maxSize = maxString.length();
for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) {
if (list[i].length() > maxSize) {
maxString = list[i];
maxSize = maxString.length();
}
}
return maxSize;
}
Always!?
What happens on the empty list?
30
unit testing
∙ Different tools have different approaches/tools;
∙ The idea is the same: test!
31
unit testing
∙ Different tools have different approaches/tools;
∙ The idea is the same: test!
∙ What to test?
31
unit testing
∙ Different tools have different approaches/tools;
∙ The idea is the same: test!
∙ What to test?
∙ Everything!
∙ Test a simple case;
∙ Test a large case;
∙ Test weird cases;
∙ Test limit cases!
31
do it yourself testing
static class Test {
static void is(int a, int b) {
System.out.println( a == b ? ”ok” : ”nok” );
}
}
32
do it yourself testing
static class Test {
static void is(int a, int b) {
System.out.println( a == b ? ”ok” : ”nok” );
}
}
Then…
string[] array = { ”banana”, ”apple”, ”strawberry” };
Test.is( 10, LongestString(array) );
string[] array1 = { ”pear” };
Test.is( 4, LongestString(array) );
32
do it yourself testing
You can ever try and test if a method throws an exception!
static class Test {
static void throws(Runnable code, Class<?> class) {
boolean ok = false;
try {
code.run();
} catch (Exception e) {
if (e instanceof class) ok = true;
}
System.out.println( ok ? ”ok” : ”nok” );
}
}
Non Tested Code!
33
testing: why?
∙ To know your code is working;
∙ To know your code is still working;
∙ To know that your latest change does not mess with your
working code;
34
must read
How To Write Unmaintainable Code
by Roedy Green
https://www.thc.org/root/phun/unmaintain.html
Thank you!
35

More Related Content

Similar to Source Code Quality (20)

PDF
Perfect Code
Artem Tabalin
 
PDF
ACM init() Spring 2015 Day 1
UCLA Association of Computing Machinery
 
ODP
Python Presentation
Narendra Sisodiya
 
PDF
Clean Code 2
Fredrik Wendt
 
PDF
Undefined behavior is closer than you think
Andrey Karpov
 
PPTX
Presentation 2nd
Connex
 
KEY
Anti-Patterns
Robert Brown
 
PPTX
Keep Code Left - How to write better code in almost any language
Mick Andrew
 
PPT
CIntro_Up_To_Functions.ppt;uoooooooooooooooooooo
muhammedcti23240202
 
PPT
270_1_CIntro_Up_To_Functions.ppt 0478 computer
vynark1
 
PPT
270_1_CIntro_Up_To_Functions.ppt
UdhayaKumar175069
 
PPT
270_1_CIntro_Up_To_Functions.ppt
Alefya1
 
PPT
Survey of programming language getting started in C
ummeafruz
 
PPT
270 1 c_intro_up_to_functions
ray143eddie
 
PDF
Safety of 64-bit code
PVS-Studio
 
PPT
270_1_ChapterIntro_Up_To_Functions (1).ppt
GayathriShiva4
 
PDF
Contest Tips and Tricks
mbuzdalov
 
PDF
About size_t and ptrdiff_t
PVS-Studio
 
PPT
270_1_CIntro_Up_To_Functions.ppt
JoshCasas1
 
PDF
Fuzzing - Part 1
UTD Computer Security Group
 
Perfect Code
Artem Tabalin
 
ACM init() Spring 2015 Day 1
UCLA Association of Computing Machinery
 
Python Presentation
Narendra Sisodiya
 
Clean Code 2
Fredrik Wendt
 
Undefined behavior is closer than you think
Andrey Karpov
 
Presentation 2nd
Connex
 
Anti-Patterns
Robert Brown
 
Keep Code Left - How to write better code in almost any language
Mick Andrew
 
CIntro_Up_To_Functions.ppt;uoooooooooooooooooooo
muhammedcti23240202
 
270_1_CIntro_Up_To_Functions.ppt 0478 computer
vynark1
 
270_1_CIntro_Up_To_Functions.ppt
UdhayaKumar175069
 
270_1_CIntro_Up_To_Functions.ppt
Alefya1
 
Survey of programming language getting started in C
ummeafruz
 
270 1 c_intro_up_to_functions
ray143eddie
 
Safety of 64-bit code
PVS-Studio
 
270_1_ChapterIntro_Up_To_Functions (1).ppt
GayathriShiva4
 
Contest Tips and Tricks
mbuzdalov
 
About size_t and ptrdiff_t
PVS-Studio
 
270_1_CIntro_Up_To_Functions.ppt
JoshCasas1
 
Fuzzing - Part 1
UTD Computer Security Group
 

More from Alberto Simões (20)

PDF
Language Identification: A neural network approach
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Google Maps JS API
Alberto Simões
 
PPTX
Making the most of a 100-year-old dictionary
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Dictionary Alignment by Rewrite-based Entry Translation
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
EMLex-A5: Specialized Dictionaries
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Modelação de Dados
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Aula 04 - Introdução aos Diagramas de Sequência
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Aula 03 - Introdução aos Diagramas de Atividade
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Aula 02 - Engenharia de Requisitos
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Aula 01 - Planeamento de Sistemas de Informação
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Building C and C++ libraries with Perl
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
PLN em Perl
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Redes de Pert
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Dancing Tutorial
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Processing XML: a rewriting system approach
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Sistemas de Numeração
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Álgebra de Boole
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Arquitecturas de Tradução Automática
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Extracção de Recursos para Tradução Automática
Alberto Simões
 
PDF
Dicionário Aberto
Alberto Simões
 
Language Identification: A neural network approach
Alberto Simões
 
Google Maps JS API
Alberto Simões
 
Making the most of a 100-year-old dictionary
Alberto Simões
 
Dictionary Alignment by Rewrite-based Entry Translation
Alberto Simões
 
EMLex-A5: Specialized Dictionaries
Alberto Simões
 
Modelação de Dados
Alberto Simões
 
Aula 04 - Introdução aos Diagramas de Sequência
Alberto Simões
 
Aula 03 - Introdução aos Diagramas de Atividade
Alberto Simões
 
Aula 02 - Engenharia de Requisitos
Alberto Simões
 
Aula 01 - Planeamento de Sistemas de Informação
Alberto Simões
 
Building C and C++ libraries with Perl
Alberto Simões
 
PLN em Perl
Alberto Simões
 
Redes de Pert
Alberto Simões
 
Dancing Tutorial
Alberto Simões
 
Processing XML: a rewriting system approach
Alberto Simões
 
Sistemas de Numeração
Alberto Simões
 
Álgebra de Boole
Alberto Simões
 
Arquitecturas de Tradução Automática
Alberto Simões
 
Extracção de Recursos para Tradução Automática
Alberto Simões
 
Dicionário Aberto
Alberto Simões
 
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Function & Procedure: Function Vs Procedure in PL/SQL
Shani Tiwari
 
PPTX
BB FlashBack Pro 5.61.0.4843 With Crack Free Download
cracked shares
 
PDF
Simplify React app login with asgardeo-sdk
vaibhav289687
 
PDF
Is Framer the Future of AI Powered No-Code Development?
Isla Pandora
 
PDF
MiniTool Partition Wizard Free Crack + Full Free Download 2025
bashirkhan333g
 
PDF
SAP Firmaya İade ABAB Kodları - ABAB ile yazılmıl hazır kod örneği
Salih Küçük
 
PDF
Latest Capcut Pro 5.9.0 Crack Version For PC {Fully 2025
utfefguu
 
PDF
IDM Crack with Internet Download Manager 6.42 Build 43 with Patch Latest 2025
bashirkhan333g
 
PPTX
UI5con_2025_Accessibility_Ever_Evolving_
gerganakremenska1
 
PPTX
Get Started with Maestro: Agent, Robot, and Human in Action – Session 5 of 5
klpathrudu
 
PDF
Everything you need to know about pricing & licensing Microsoft 365 Copilot f...
Q-Advise
 
PDF
Why is partnering with a SaaS development company crucial for enterprise succ...
Nextbrain Technologies
 
PDF
AOMEI Partition Assistant Crack 10.8.2 + WinPE Free Downlaod New Version 2025
bashirkhan333g
 
PDF
NPD Software -Omnex systems
omnex systems
 
PPTX
Foundations of Marketo Engage - Powering Campaigns with Marketo Personalization
bbedford2
 
PDF
Meet in the Middle: Solving the Low-Latency Challenge for Agentic AI
Alluxio, Inc.
 
PPTX
prodad heroglyph crack 2.0.214.2 Full Free Download
cracked shares
 
PDF
intro_to_cpp_namespace_robotics_corner.pdf
MohamedSaied877003
 
PPTX
iaas vs paas vs saas :choosing your cloud strategy
CloudlayaTechnology
 
PPTX
Library_Management_System_PPT111111.pptx
nmtnissancrm
 
Function & Procedure: Function Vs Procedure in PL/SQL
Shani Tiwari
 
BB FlashBack Pro 5.61.0.4843 With Crack Free Download
cracked shares
 
Simplify React app login with asgardeo-sdk
vaibhav289687
 
Is Framer the Future of AI Powered No-Code Development?
Isla Pandora
 
MiniTool Partition Wizard Free Crack + Full Free Download 2025
bashirkhan333g
 
SAP Firmaya İade ABAB Kodları - ABAB ile yazılmıl hazır kod örneği
Salih Küçük
 
Latest Capcut Pro 5.9.0 Crack Version For PC {Fully 2025
utfefguu
 
IDM Crack with Internet Download Manager 6.42 Build 43 with Patch Latest 2025
bashirkhan333g
 
UI5con_2025_Accessibility_Ever_Evolving_
gerganakremenska1
 
Get Started with Maestro: Agent, Robot, and Human in Action – Session 5 of 5
klpathrudu
 
Everything you need to know about pricing & licensing Microsoft 365 Copilot f...
Q-Advise
 
Why is partnering with a SaaS development company crucial for enterprise succ...
Nextbrain Technologies
 
AOMEI Partition Assistant Crack 10.8.2 + WinPE Free Downlaod New Version 2025
bashirkhan333g
 
NPD Software -Omnex systems
omnex systems
 
Foundations of Marketo Engage - Powering Campaigns with Marketo Personalization
bbedford2
 
Meet in the Middle: Solving the Low-Latency Challenge for Agentic AI
Alluxio, Inc.
 
prodad heroglyph crack 2.0.214.2 Full Free Download
cracked shares
 
intro_to_cpp_namespace_robotics_corner.pdf
MohamedSaied877003
 
iaas vs paas vs saas :choosing your cloud strategy
CloudlayaTechnology
 
Library_Management_System_PPT111111.pptx
nmtnissancrm
 
Ad

Source Code Quality

  • 1. source code quality Alberto Simões March 10, 2015 – ESEIG-IPP – Vila do Conde Departamento de Informática Universidade do Minho
  • 4. no bad code initiative 3
  • 6. code problems ∙ Legibility Issues; ∙ Code should document itself; 4
  • 7. code problems ∙ Legibility Issues; ∙ Code should document itself; ∙ Code should be easy to read; 4
  • 8. code problems ∙ Legibility Issues; ∙ Code should document itself; ∙ Code should be easy to read; ∙ Code should be elegant! 4
  • 9. code problems ∙ Legibility Issues; ∙ Code should document itself; ∙ Code should be easy to read; ∙ Code should be elegant! ∙ Documentation Issues; 4
  • 10. code problems ∙ Legibility Issues; ∙ Code should document itself; ∙ Code should be easy to read; ∙ Code should be elegant! ∙ Documentation Issues; ∙ Documentation should exist; 4
  • 11. code problems ∙ Legibility Issues; ∙ Code should document itself; ∙ Code should be easy to read; ∙ Code should be elegant! ∙ Documentation Issues; ∙ Documentation should exist; ∙ Documentation should follow standards; 4
  • 12. code problems ∙ Legibility Issues; ∙ Code should document itself; ∙ Code should be easy to read; ∙ Code should be elegant! ∙ Documentation Issues; ∙ Documentation should exist; ∙ Documentation should follow standards; ∙ Documentation should document! 4
  • 13. code problems ∙ Legibility Issues; ∙ Code should document itself; ∙ Code should be easy to read; ∙ Code should be elegant! ∙ Documentation Issues; ∙ Documentation should exist; ∙ Documentation should follow standards; ∙ Documentation should document! ∙ Testing Issues; 4
  • 14. code problems ∙ Legibility Issues; ∙ Code should document itself; ∙ Code should be easy to read; ∙ Code should be elegant! ∙ Documentation Issues; ∙ Documentation should exist; ∙ Documentation should follow standards; ∙ Documentation should document! ∙ Testing Issues; ∙ Code should work on correct input; 4
  • 15. code problems ∙ Legibility Issues; ∙ Code should document itself; ∙ Code should be easy to read; ∙ Code should be elegant! ∙ Documentation Issues; ∙ Documentation should exist; ∙ Documentation should follow standards; ∙ Documentation should document! ∙ Testing Issues; ∙ Code should work on correct input; ∙ Code should work on incorrect input; 4
  • 16. code problems ∙ Legibility Issues; ∙ Code should document itself; ∙ Code should be easy to read; ∙ Code should be elegant! ∙ Documentation Issues; ∙ Documentation should exist; ∙ Documentation should follow standards; ∙ Documentation should document! ∙ Testing Issues; ∙ Code should work on correct input; ∙ Code should work on incorrect input; ∙ Code should be tested on every change! 4
  • 19. use meaningful identifiers What does this code do? int x(string g[]) { string p = g[0]; int o = p.length(); for (z=1;z<g.length;++z) { if (g[z].length()>o) { p=g[z];o=p.length(); } } return o; } 7
  • 20. use meaningful identifiers Is this better? int x(string list[]) { string maxString = list[0]; int maxSize = maxString.length(); for (i=1;i<list.length;++i) { if (list[i].length()>maxSize) { maxString=list[i]; maxSize=maxString.length(); } } return maxSize; } 8
  • 21. use coherent indentation Do you prefer this… int x(string list[]) { string maxString = list[0]; int maxSize = maxString.length(); for (i=1;i<list.length;++i) { if (list[i].length()>maxSize) { maxString=list[i]; maxSize=maxString.length(); } } return maxSize; } 9
  • 22. use coherent indentation or this? int x(string list[]) { string maxString = list[0]; int maxSize = maxString.length(); for (i=1;i<list.length;++i) { if (list[i].length()>maxSize) { maxString=list[i]; maxSize=maxString.length(); } } return maxSize; } 10
  • 23. use coherent identifiers int x(string Lists[]) { string max_String = Lista[0]; int maxSize = max_String.length(); for (i=1;i<Lista.length;++i) { if (Lista[i].length()>maxSize) { max_String=Lista[i]; maxSize=max_String.length(); } } return maxSize; } 11
  • 24. use coherent identifiers Choose: ∙ One language: I prefer English given keywords are English, but any will work! 12
  • 25. use coherent identifiers Choose: ∙ One language: I prefer English given keywords are English, but any will work! ∙ Use one variable style: If you prefer use CamelCaseIdentifiers; Or, why not, underscores_identifiers; but not both! 12
  • 26. use coherent identifiers Choose: ∙ One language: I prefer English given keywords are English, but any will work! ∙ Use one variable style: If you prefer use CamelCaseIdentifiers; Or, why not, underscores_identifiers; but not both! ∙ Note that some languages have conventions: Java libraries use CamelCase; GNU Toolkit (GTK+) use underscores; So, probably a good idea to follow the flow… 12
  • 27. use standard code structure Does this work? int x(string list[]) { ; string maxString = list[0] ; int maxSize = maxString.length() ; for (i=1;i<list.length;++i) if (list[i].length()>maxSize) { ; maxString=list[i] ; maxSize=maxString.length() ; } ; return maxSize ; } Isn’t it cute? 13
  • 28. use standard and coherent code structure Choose one, but stick to it! int x(string list[]) { string maxString = list[0]; int maxSize = maxString.length(); for (i=1;i<list.length;++i) if (list[i].length()>maxSize) { maxString=list[i]; maxSize=maxString.length(); } return maxSize; } int x(string list[]) { string maxString = list[0]; int maxSize = maxString.length(); for (i=1;i<list.length;++i) if (list[i].length()>maxSize) { maxString=list[i]; maxSize=maxString.length(); } return maxSize; } 14
  • 29. use vertical alignment Most editors suck and mess with vertical alignment. Nevertheless, it is useful. See the error? Sprite tank=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/tank.png”); Sprite chopper=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprtes/chopper.png”); Sprite balloons=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/balloons.png”); 15
  • 30. use vertical alignment Most editors suck and mess with vertical alignment. Nevertheless, it is useful. See the error? Sprite tank=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/tank.png”); Sprite chopper=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprtes/chopper.png”); Sprite balloons=LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/balloons.png”); And now? Sprite tank = LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/tank.png”); Sprite chopper = LoadSprite(”path/to/sprtes/chopper.png”); Sprite balloons = LoadSprite(”path/to/sprites/balloons.png”); 15
  • 31. be explicit C, Java and C# are tolerant, so you can write if (foo < bar) do_something(foo, bar); Look, m’a! No curly brackets! 16
  • 32. be explicit C, Java and C# are tolerant, so you can write if (foo < bar) do_something(foo, bar); Look, m’a! No curly brackets! Problem? Later you might need to add an action and probably you will add it like this: if (foo < bar) do_something(foo, bar); do_something_else(foo, bar); And does that do what you mean? 16
  • 33. be explicit ii So, how do you read this? if (a < b) if (b < c) a = c; else c = b; Or, more important, how does the compiler read it? 17
  • 34. be explicit ii So, how do you read this? if (a < b) if (b < c) a = c; else c = b; Or, more important, how does the compiler read it? if (a < b) if (b < c) a = c; else c = b; if (a < b) if (b < c) a = c; else c = b; 17
  • 35. be explicit ii Better with curly brackets! if (a < b) { if (b < c) { a = c; } } else { c = b; } if (a < b) { if (b < c) { a = c; } else { c = b; } } Even without indentation you can understand it properly!! And better! You do not need to know how the compiler interprets it. 18
  • 36. use proper data structures Implement related data as a data structure. So, in pacman we have four ghosts. Store their positions. int g1x, g1y, g2x, g2y, g3x, g3y, g4x, g4y; 19
  • 37. use proper data structures Implement related data as a data structure. So, in pacman we have four ghosts. Store their positions. int g1x, g1y, g2x, g2y, g3x, g3y, g4x, g4y; There are only four, right? And it works! 19
  • 38. use proper data structures Implement related data as a data structure. So, in pacman we have four ghosts. Store their positions. int g1x, g1y, g2x, g2y, g3x, g3y, g4x, g4y; There are only four, right? And it works! Probably better: class Pair { public int x, y; }; Pair[] ghost = new Pair[4]; // now use ghost[0].x, ghost[1].y, etc 19
  • 41. should it exist? Real programmers don’t comment their code, if it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand and harder to modify. — unknown 22
  • 42. should it exist? Real programmers don’t comment their code, if it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand and harder to modify. — unknown Kidding. It should really exist! 22
  • 43. is this documentation? /* Computes the length of the longer string */ int LongestString(string list[]) { string maxString = list[0]; int maxSize = maxString.length(); for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) { if (list[i].length() > maxSize) { maxString = list[i]; maxSize = maxString.length(); } } return maxSize; } 23
  • 44. is this documentation? /* Computes the length of the longer string */ int LongestString(string list[]) { string maxString = list[0]; int maxSize = maxString.length(); for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) { if (list[i].length() > maxSize) { maxString = list[i]; maxSize = maxString.length(); } } return maxSize; } Not really! 23
  • 45. documentation relevance Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and when it is bad, it is better than nothing. — Dick Brandon (?) 24
  • 46. documentation content Try to include: ∙ What the code is about; ∙ What are each of the input arguments/parameters; ∙ What is the type and content of the returned value; ∙ If any of the method/function parameters are for output; ∙ What restrictions does the input values have? ∙ What happens when you do not follow that restriction? ∙ What exceptions are thrown directy? ∙ What exceptions are not catched and might be propagated? ∙ What is the algorithm? 25
  • 47. use standards Most programming languages have a standard documentation approach: ∙ Perl has POD; ∙ Java has JavaDoc; ∙ Haskell has Hadock; ∙ C# has “XML Comments”; ∙ Python has Sphinx; ∙ C has Doxygen; ∙ C++ has Doxygen too; ∙ Lots of cross-language tools; 26
  • 48. example: javadoc /** * Given an array of strings, compute the length of the * longest string. * <p> * This method will not work for empty lists. * * @param list the list of strings to be processed; * @return the size of the longest string * in the array; */ int LongestString(string list[]) { string maxString = list[0]; int maxSize = maxString.length(); for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) { [...] 27
  • 51. does this work? int LongestString(string list[]) { string maxString = list[0]; int maxSize = maxString.length(); for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) { if (list[i].length() > maxSize) { maxString = list[i]; maxSize = maxString.length(); } } return maxSize; } 30
  • 52. does this work? int LongestString(string list[]) { string maxString = list[0]; int maxSize = maxString.length(); for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) { if (list[i].length() > maxSize) { maxString = list[i]; maxSize = maxString.length(); } } return maxSize; } Always!? 30
  • 53. does this work? int LongestString(string list[]) { string maxString = list[0]; int maxSize = maxString.length(); for (i=1; i<list.length; i++) { if (list[i].length() > maxSize) { maxString = list[i]; maxSize = maxString.length(); } } return maxSize; } Always!? What happens on the empty list? 30
  • 54. unit testing ∙ Different tools have different approaches/tools; ∙ The idea is the same: test! 31
  • 55. unit testing ∙ Different tools have different approaches/tools; ∙ The idea is the same: test! ∙ What to test? 31
  • 56. unit testing ∙ Different tools have different approaches/tools; ∙ The idea is the same: test! ∙ What to test? ∙ Everything! ∙ Test a simple case; ∙ Test a large case; ∙ Test weird cases; ∙ Test limit cases! 31
  • 57. do it yourself testing static class Test { static void is(int a, int b) { System.out.println( a == b ? ”ok” : ”nok” ); } } 32
  • 58. do it yourself testing static class Test { static void is(int a, int b) { System.out.println( a == b ? ”ok” : ”nok” ); } } Then… string[] array = { ”banana”, ”apple”, ”strawberry” }; Test.is( 10, LongestString(array) ); string[] array1 = { ”pear” }; Test.is( 4, LongestString(array) ); 32
  • 59. do it yourself testing You can ever try and test if a method throws an exception! static class Test { static void throws(Runnable code, Class<?> class) { boolean ok = false; try { code.run(); } catch (Exception e) { if (e instanceof class) ok = true; } System.out.println( ok ? ”ok” : ”nok” ); } } Non Tested Code! 33
  • 60. testing: why? ∙ To know your code is working; ∙ To know your code is still working; ∙ To know that your latest change does not mess with your working code; 34
  • 61. must read How To Write Unmaintainable Code by Roedy Green https://www.thc.org/root/phun/unmaintain.html Thank you! 35