Trauma– Blunt Abdominal Trauma
Douglas M. Maurer, DO, MPH
Learning Objectives
• Recognize and respond appropriately to a
patient with hemorrhagic shock
• Assess via bedside methods the source
of hemorrhage
• Respond appropriately to evidence of
intra-abdominal hemorrhage with regards
to initial management and disposition
Introduction
• Blunt abdominal trauma is common.
• Unknown history, distracting injuries, and
altered mental status make these patients
difficult to diagnose and manage.
• Victims frequently have both abdominal
and extraabdominal injuries.
• Family physicians need to be able to
recognize and treat hemorrhagic shock.
Recognition of Hemorrhagic Shock
• Shock: oxygen delivery < tissue demands
• Treatment must restore tissue perfusion not
just blood pressure
• Shock does NOT SBP < 90mmHg
• Recognition includes: mechanism of injury,
patient’s appearance, vitals, level of
mentation, peripheral perfusion and urine
output
• Clinical parameters should be coupled with
objective markers of tissue perfusion--serum
lactate, base deficit, etc.
Practical Diagnosis of Shock
• Perform a targeted physical examination
• Diagnostic testing should include chest
radiography, pelvis radiography, and
bedside ultrasound
• Objective serum makers of tissue
perfusion (serum lactate or base deficit)
• Point of care H/H, send CBC, type/cross
• DON’T delay resuscitation for lab results
6 Steps to Treat Hemorrhagic Shock
• Step 1: Effectively manage the airway and
optimize oxygenation.
• Step 2: Identify and control immediate threats to
central perfusion.
• Step 3: Identify and address severe intracranial
injuries.
• Step 4: Identify and control other potentially life-
threatening thoracic and abdominal injuries.
• Step 5: Identify and control potentially limb-
threatening injuries.
• Step 6: Identify and treat noncritical injuries.
Treatment of Hemorrhagic Shock
• Obtain immediate type and crossmatch
for 6-8 units of blood
• Massive transfusion defined as > 10 U of
PRBCs in 24 hrs
• Consider use of PRBC to platelet to FFP
ratio of 1:1:1
• May result in decreased need for blood
products
• Give calcium to prevent citrate toxicity
Assessing for Sources of Hemorrhage
• Chest radiography:
• Tension pneumothorax? Massive hemothorax?
Aortic injury?
• Pelvis radiography:
• Pelvic ring disruption?
• Focused Assessment with Sonography for
Trauma (FAST):
• Pneumo/hemothorax? Hemopericardium?
Hemoperitoneum?
• If positive, then emergency laparotomy.
• If negative, continue resuscitation, treat other causes.
FAST Facts
• Reliably identifies 200-250ml of
intraperitoneal fluid
• Cannot reliably evaluate
retroperitoneum/hollow viscous injury
• Sensitivity/specificity: 75%/98%, NPV:
94%; 86-97% accurate
• Performed using a curvilinear 2.5 or 3.5
MHz probe
FAST Views
• Cardiac: parasternal or subxiphoid,
hepatocardiac interface, pericardial space.
• RUQ: hepatorenal interface (Morrison’s
Pouch), diaphragm, inferior pole of kidney.
• LUQ: splenorenal interface, diaphragm,
inferior pole of kidney, inferior tip of spleen.
• Suprapubic: outline of bladder, silhouette of
uterus (females).
FAST Algorithm
• Unstable patient: + FAST = OR.
• Stable pt: + FAST = abdominal CT.
• Stable pt, low mechanism of injury:
- FAST = observation, serial exams.
• CT is the “Gold Standard”.
What About Diagnostic Peritoneal
Aspiration (DPA)?
• Can be performed if - FAST in blunt
abdominal trauma.
• If DPA +, then emergency laparotomy.
• If DPA -, then seek and treat other
sources.
• Perform serial abdominal exams.
• Perform serial FAST exams.
• If patient stabilizes, then CT.
• Get surgery involved!
Indications for Emergency
Laparotomy
• Peritonism
• Free air under the diaphragm
• Significant gastrointestinal hemorrhage
• Hypotension with + FAST scan or + DPA
• Do NOT keep trauma patients if you lack
resources to care for them!
Summary
• Recognize and treat hemorrhagic shock
aggressively with blood products
• Assess for hemorrhage with bedside
methods: CXR, pelvis, and FAST
• Unstable patient: + FAST = OR.
• Stable pt: + FAST = abdominal CT.
• Stable pt, low mechanism of injury:
- FAST = observation, serial exams.
References
1. Puskarich MA. Initial evaluation and management of blunt
abdominal trauma in adults. In: UpToDate, Hockberger RS,
Moreira ME (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA, 2012.
2. Nickson C. “Trauma! Blunt abdominal trauma decision
making.” Weblog entry. Life in the Fastlane Blog.
http://lifeinthefastlane.com/2012/03/trauma-tribulation-023/
3. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Guidelines
Workgroup. Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. 2010
Edition. Chicago, IL.
http://www.east.org/resources/treatment-
guidelines/category/trauma
4. American College of Surgeons. ATLS Textbook, 9th Edition. 1
September 2012.
Simulation Training Assessment Tool
(STAT)– Blunt Abdominal Trauma
Douglas M. Maurer, DO, MPH, FAAFP
CRITICAL ACTIONS ME NI M SUSTAIN IMPROVE
Completes Primary Survey:
recognizes shock
MK2
Safety net – IV, oxygen,
monitors (2 x 16G IV)
MK2
Completes Secondary Survey:
recognizes abdominal source
MK2
Completes bedside FAST
(+ Morrison’s Pouch)
PC5
Recognizes positive FAST: calls
surgery
PC5
Bedside labs: POC CBC, lactate,
BAL, VBG, blood type/screen/X-
match
MK2
Bedside rads: port chest, lat C-
spine, AP pelvis
MK2
Gives emergency release blood
transfusion
MK2
If unstable: no CT, to OR
If stabilizes: CT, then OR
MK2
TOTAL
SBP
4
SCENARIO ALGORITHM
SET UP:
“Rural” ER Simulated Room
Bedside US and/or FAST simulator
Real patient with simulated skin/abdomen
PRE ARRIVAL:
FP in rural ER, lab, rad, OR
35 y/o male s/p unrestrained driver MVA
arrives via EMS, in c-collar. VS BP 90/50, HR
110, RR 18, SpO2 97% on RA, GCS 15
ARRIVAL:
Full spinal precautions, has 1 IV in place. Pt
awake, alert, conversing, but in mild distress,
no meds, no allergies, no sig PMHx or PSHx
PRIMARY SURVEY:
A – talking initially, then somnolent
B – labored, RR 24, nl breath sounds
C – BP 85/40, HR 130, cool extremities
D – GCS 14, somnolent, oriented to person
when responds to voice
E – no other trauma, mild abd distension,
hypoactive BS
SECONDARY SURVEY:
Other exam normal, c-spine non tender,
pelvis stable, rectal guaiac negative
Abdominal exam tense, tender, absent BS
LABS & IMAGES:
Chest, c-spine, pelvis negative
Labs – WBC 9, H/H 8/24, platelets 150,
lactate 4, VBG: 7.35/46/40/50%/-8
Positive FAST in RUQ, no CT indicated
Blood type and screen/X-match
DISPOSITION:
Must transfuse blood , call Surgeon and direct
to OR, otherwise pt dies of hemorrhage
Simulation Training Assessment Tool (STAT)– Blunt Abdominal Trauma
Date: 1 May 2013 Instructor(s): Clark, Maurer, Cuda Learner(s):
Learning Objectives:
1. Recognize and respond appropriately to a patient with hemorrhagic shock.
2. Assess via bedside methods the source of hemorrhage.
3. Respond appropriately to evidence of intra-abdominal hemorrhage with regards to initial
management and disposition.
ME = Meets Expectations; NI = Needs Improvement, M = Milestones (see debriefing sheet)
Perihepatic
Perihepatic
Perisplenic
Perisplenic
Pelvic
Pelvic
Pericardium
Pericardium

Stfm trauma curriculum_blunt-abdominal-trauma

  • 1.
    Trauma– Blunt AbdominalTrauma Douglas M. Maurer, DO, MPH
  • 2.
    Learning Objectives • Recognizeand respond appropriately to a patient with hemorrhagic shock • Assess via bedside methods the source of hemorrhage • Respond appropriately to evidence of intra-abdominal hemorrhage with regards to initial management and disposition
  • 3.
    Introduction • Blunt abdominaltrauma is common. • Unknown history, distracting injuries, and altered mental status make these patients difficult to diagnose and manage. • Victims frequently have both abdominal and extraabdominal injuries. • Family physicians need to be able to recognize and treat hemorrhagic shock.
  • 4.
    Recognition of HemorrhagicShock • Shock: oxygen delivery < tissue demands • Treatment must restore tissue perfusion not just blood pressure • Shock does NOT SBP < 90mmHg • Recognition includes: mechanism of injury, patient’s appearance, vitals, level of mentation, peripheral perfusion and urine output • Clinical parameters should be coupled with objective markers of tissue perfusion--serum lactate, base deficit, etc.
  • 5.
    Practical Diagnosis ofShock • Perform a targeted physical examination • Diagnostic testing should include chest radiography, pelvis radiography, and bedside ultrasound • Objective serum makers of tissue perfusion (serum lactate or base deficit) • Point of care H/H, send CBC, type/cross • DON’T delay resuscitation for lab results
  • 6.
    6 Steps toTreat Hemorrhagic Shock • Step 1: Effectively manage the airway and optimize oxygenation. • Step 2: Identify and control immediate threats to central perfusion. • Step 3: Identify and address severe intracranial injuries. • Step 4: Identify and control other potentially life- threatening thoracic and abdominal injuries. • Step 5: Identify and control potentially limb- threatening injuries. • Step 6: Identify and treat noncritical injuries.
  • 7.
    Treatment of HemorrhagicShock • Obtain immediate type and crossmatch for 6-8 units of blood • Massive transfusion defined as > 10 U of PRBCs in 24 hrs • Consider use of PRBC to platelet to FFP ratio of 1:1:1 • May result in decreased need for blood products • Give calcium to prevent citrate toxicity
  • 8.
    Assessing for Sourcesof Hemorrhage • Chest radiography: • Tension pneumothorax? Massive hemothorax? Aortic injury? • Pelvis radiography: • Pelvic ring disruption? • Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST): • Pneumo/hemothorax? Hemopericardium? Hemoperitoneum? • If positive, then emergency laparotomy. • If negative, continue resuscitation, treat other causes.
  • 9.
    FAST Facts • Reliablyidentifies 200-250ml of intraperitoneal fluid • Cannot reliably evaluate retroperitoneum/hollow viscous injury • Sensitivity/specificity: 75%/98%, NPV: 94%; 86-97% accurate • Performed using a curvilinear 2.5 or 3.5 MHz probe
  • 10.
    FAST Views • Cardiac:parasternal or subxiphoid, hepatocardiac interface, pericardial space. • RUQ: hepatorenal interface (Morrison’s Pouch), diaphragm, inferior pole of kidney. • LUQ: splenorenal interface, diaphragm, inferior pole of kidney, inferior tip of spleen. • Suprapubic: outline of bladder, silhouette of uterus (females).
  • 11.
    FAST Algorithm • Unstablepatient: + FAST = OR. • Stable pt: + FAST = abdominal CT. • Stable pt, low mechanism of injury: - FAST = observation, serial exams. • CT is the “Gold Standard”.
  • 12.
    What About DiagnosticPeritoneal Aspiration (DPA)? • Can be performed if - FAST in blunt abdominal trauma. • If DPA +, then emergency laparotomy. • If DPA -, then seek and treat other sources. • Perform serial abdominal exams. • Perform serial FAST exams. • If patient stabilizes, then CT. • Get surgery involved!
  • 13.
    Indications for Emergency Laparotomy •Peritonism • Free air under the diaphragm • Significant gastrointestinal hemorrhage • Hypotension with + FAST scan or + DPA • Do NOT keep trauma patients if you lack resources to care for them!
  • 14.
    Summary • Recognize andtreat hemorrhagic shock aggressively with blood products • Assess for hemorrhage with bedside methods: CXR, pelvis, and FAST • Unstable patient: + FAST = OR. • Stable pt: + FAST = abdominal CT. • Stable pt, low mechanism of injury: - FAST = observation, serial exams.
  • 15.
    References 1. Puskarich MA.Initial evaluation and management of blunt abdominal trauma in adults. In: UpToDate, Hockberger RS, Moreira ME (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA, 2012. 2. Nickson C. “Trauma! Blunt abdominal trauma decision making.” Weblog entry. Life in the Fastlane Blog. http://lifeinthefastlane.com/2012/03/trauma-tribulation-023/ 3. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Guidelines Workgroup. Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. 2010 Edition. Chicago, IL. http://www.east.org/resources/treatment- guidelines/category/trauma 4. American College of Surgeons. ATLS Textbook, 9th Edition. 1 September 2012.
  • 16.
    Simulation Training AssessmentTool (STAT)– Blunt Abdominal Trauma Douglas M. Maurer, DO, MPH, FAAFP
  • 17.
    CRITICAL ACTIONS MENI M SUSTAIN IMPROVE Completes Primary Survey: recognizes shock MK2 Safety net – IV, oxygen, monitors (2 x 16G IV) MK2 Completes Secondary Survey: recognizes abdominal source MK2 Completes bedside FAST (+ Morrison’s Pouch) PC5 Recognizes positive FAST: calls surgery PC5 Bedside labs: POC CBC, lactate, BAL, VBG, blood type/screen/X- match MK2 Bedside rads: port chest, lat C- spine, AP pelvis MK2 Gives emergency release blood transfusion MK2 If unstable: no CT, to OR If stabilizes: CT, then OR MK2 TOTAL SBP 4 SCENARIO ALGORITHM SET UP: “Rural” ER Simulated Room Bedside US and/or FAST simulator Real patient with simulated skin/abdomen PRE ARRIVAL: FP in rural ER, lab, rad, OR 35 y/o male s/p unrestrained driver MVA arrives via EMS, in c-collar. VS BP 90/50, HR 110, RR 18, SpO2 97% on RA, GCS 15 ARRIVAL: Full spinal precautions, has 1 IV in place. Pt awake, alert, conversing, but in mild distress, no meds, no allergies, no sig PMHx or PSHx PRIMARY SURVEY: A – talking initially, then somnolent B – labored, RR 24, nl breath sounds C – BP 85/40, HR 130, cool extremities D – GCS 14, somnolent, oriented to person when responds to voice E – no other trauma, mild abd distension, hypoactive BS SECONDARY SURVEY: Other exam normal, c-spine non tender, pelvis stable, rectal guaiac negative Abdominal exam tense, tender, absent BS LABS & IMAGES: Chest, c-spine, pelvis negative Labs – WBC 9, H/H 8/24, platelets 150, lactate 4, VBG: 7.35/46/40/50%/-8 Positive FAST in RUQ, no CT indicated Blood type and screen/X-match DISPOSITION: Must transfuse blood , call Surgeon and direct to OR, otherwise pt dies of hemorrhage Simulation Training Assessment Tool (STAT)– Blunt Abdominal Trauma Date: 1 May 2013 Instructor(s): Clark, Maurer, Cuda Learner(s): Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize and respond appropriately to a patient with hemorrhagic shock. 2. Assess via bedside methods the source of hemorrhage. 3. Respond appropriately to evidence of intra-abdominal hemorrhage with regards to initial management and disposition. ME = Meets Expectations; NI = Needs Improvement, M = Milestones (see debriefing sheet)
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.