Study of consolidation parameters

Study of
consolidation
parameters
Presented by:
Ayesha samreen
1st year M.Pharm (pharmaceutics),
KLE college of pharmacy, bangalore

• Content
Diffusion parameters
Dissolution parameters
Pharmacokinetic parameters
Heckel plot
Similarity factors f1 and f2

DIFFUSION PARAMETERS
• This is given by Higuchi.
𝑄 = 𝐾 𝑻
• Where Q is the amount of drug released in time‘t’ per unit area,
K is higuchi constant
T is time in hr.
• Plot: The data obtained is to be plotted as cumulative percentage
drug release versus Square root of time.
• Application: modified release pharmaceutical dosage forms,
transdermal systems and matrix tablets with water soluble drugs.

Dissolution parameters
• Dissolution is a process in which a solid
substance solubilizes in a given solvent i.e. mass
transfer from the solid surface to the liquid
phase.

• Dissolution parameters
a) Effect of agitation
b) Effect of dissolution fluid
c) Influence of pH of dissolution fluid
d) Effect of surface tension of the dissolution
medium

e) Effect of viscosity of the dissolution medium
f) Effect of the presence of unreactive and reactive
additives in the dissolution medium.
g) Volume of dissolution medium and sink
conditions
h) Deaeration of the dissolution medium
i) Effect of temperature of the dissolution medium

Effect of agitation
• The relationship between the intensity of agitation and the
rate of dissolution varies considerably according to the type of
agitation used, degree of laminar and turbulent floe in the
system, the shape and design of the stirrer and the
physicochemical properties of the solid.

• Dissolution test using high speed agitation may lack
discriminative value and can yield misleading results.
• Accordingly, the compendial methods in general, are
conducted under relatively low agitation.
• For the basket method, 100 rpm usually is utilized, while for
the paddle procedure, a 50 – 75 rpm is recommended.
• In case of the non official continuous flow, column type
methods, a flow rate of 10 – 100 Ml/ min commonly is
employed.

Effect of dissolution fluid
• Selection of proper medium for dissolution testing depends
largely on the physicochemical properties of the drug.
• In the early 1960s, when dissolution was still in its infancy,
great effort was spent on emulating the in vivo conditions in
the gastrointestinal tract, especially pH, surface tension,
viscosity and sink conditions.

Influence of pH of dissolution fluid
• In 1949, a committee assigned by the American drug and
pharmaceutical manufacturers associations recommended the
use of distilled water as the test medium for the distengration
test.
• It was observed that in many instances water and dilute acid
gave closely comparable results.
• USP XV included simulated gastric fluid as the test medium
for tablets containing ingredients which reacted more readily
in acid solution than in water (e.g., calcium carbonate).
• The medium again was changed to water in the USP XVIII.

• Changes in pH exert the greatest effect in terms of drug
solubility.
• For weak acids, the dissolution rate increases with increasing
pH, whereas, for weak bases, the dissolution rate increases
with decreasing ph.
• [ average pH of stomach in men is 1.9 and 2.5 in women].
• Therefore for acetylsalicylic acid (pKa=3.5) tablets and
capsules, the dissolution rate would be expected to increase if
the pH of the dissolution medium was higher than 3.

• For tablets containing active ingredients, whose solubilities
are independent of pH, the dissolution rate does not vary
significantly with changes in pH of the dissolution medium
unless they contain certain excipients that are influenced by
pH.
• For example, Tablets that are formulated with carbon dioxide
producing compounds, such as sodium bicarbonate,
magnesium carbonate or calcium carbonate, tend to have
slightly faster dissolution rate in acid medium than in water
because rapid disintegration increases the effective surface
area.

Effect of surface tension of the
dissolution medium
• According to the diffusion film theory, dissolution of the drug
is governed by the interplay between two processes, the
release of the drug from the solid surface and its transfer
throughout the bulk of the dissolution medium.
• If the drug is hydrophobic the dissolution rate is influenced
primarily by the release processes, whereas, for hydrophilic
drugs the transfer process is more likely to be the rate limiting
step.

• Incorporation of surface active agents in the dissolution
medium, is expected to enhance the dissolution rate of a
poorly soluble drug in solid dosage forms by reducing the
interfacial tension and micelle formation.
• Addition of surfactant below the Critical micelle concentration
(CMC) can increase significantly the dissolution rate because
of better penetration of the solvent into the tablet resulting in
greater avaibility if drug surface.

Effect of viscosity of the dissolution
medium
• If the interaction at the interfaces, occurs much faster than
the rate of transport, such as in the case of diffusion
controlled dissolution processes, it would be expected that
the dissolution rate decreases with an increase in viscosity.
• The rate of dissolution of zinc in HCl solution containing
sucrose was inversely proportional to the viscosity of solution.
• The stokes-einstein equation expresses the diffusion
coefficient as a function of viscosity, as can be seen from the
following treatment.
𝐷 = µ𝑘𝑇
• µ = mobility (velocity at a force of one dyne)
• k = boltzmann constant (1.38 × 10
− 16 )

Effect of the presence of unreactive and
reactive additives in the dissolution
medium.
• When neutral ionic compounds, such as sodium chloride and
sodium sulfate, or non ionic organic compounds, such as
dextrose, were added to the dissolution medium the
dissolution of benzoic acid was dependent linearly upon its
solubility in the particular solvent.
• When certain buffers or bases were added to the aqueous
solvent , an increase in the dissolution rate was observed.

Volume of dissolution medium
and sink conditions
• The proper volume of the dissolution medium depends mainly
on the solubilty of the drug in the selected fluid.
• If the drug is poorly soluble in water, a relatively large amount
of fluid should be used if complete dissolution is to be
expected.
• In order to maintain the effect of the concentration gradient
and maintain sink conditions, the concentration of the drug
should not exceed 10 – 15% of its maximum solubility in the
dissolution medium selected.

Deaeration of the dissolution
medium
• Presence of dissolved air or other gases in the dissolution
medium may influence the dissolution rate of certain
formulations and lead to variable and unreliable results.
• Example, the dissolved air in distilled water could significantly
lower its pH and consequently affect the dissolution rate of
drugs that are sensitive to pH changes, e.g., weak acids.
• Another serious effect is the tendency of the dissolved air to
be released from the medium in the form of tiny air bubbles
that circulate at random and invariably affect the of the
hydrodynamic flow pattern generated by the stirring
mechanism.

• The gathering of air bubbles on the solid surface could also
lead to a reduction in the specific gravity to the point where
the tablet, or its disintegrating powder bed, float to the top of
he basket in the liquid medium with a minimum chance of
being wetted efficiently.

Effect of temperature of the
dissolution medium
• Drug solubility is temperature dependent, therefore careful
temperature control during the dissolution process is
extremely important.
• Generally a temperature of 37°±0.5 is maintained during
dissolution determination of oral dosage forms and
suppositories.
• For topical preparations as low as 30° and 25°have been used.

• The effect of temperature variations of the dissolution
medium depends on the temperature/ solubility curves of the
drug and the excipients in the formulation.
• Carstetensen pointed out that for a diffusion coefficient D is
dependent upon the temperature according to equation 𝐷 =
𝑈𝑘𝑇
• U = mobility ( defined as the velocity when exposed to a force
of one dyne)
• k = boltzmann constant
• T = absolute temperature

Hixson-Crowells cube root law
• Hixson and Crowell described this
W0
1/ 3 − Wt 1 /3 = Kt
Where W0 is the initial amount of drug
Wt is the remaining amount of drug at time t .
• Plot: Data is to be plotted as cube root of drug percentage
remaining in matrix versus time.
• Application: This expression applies to pharmaceutical dosage
form such as tablets, where the dissolution occurs in planes
that are parallel to the drug surface if the tablet dimensions
diminish proportionally in such a manner that the initial
geometrical form keeps constant all the time.

Pharmacokinetic parameters
• Pharmacokinetics is defined as the kinetics of
drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and
excretion and their relationship with
pharmacologic, therapeutic or toxicologic
response in mans and animals.

Plasma drug concentration-time
profile

• Three important pharmacokinetic
parameters:
1. Peak plasma concentration (Cmax)
2. Time of peak concentration (tmax)
3. Area under the curve (AUC)

Peak plasma concentration (Cmax)
• The point of maximum concentration of a drug in
plasma is called as peak and the concentration of
drug at peak is known as peak plasma
concentration.
• It is also called as peak height concentration and
maximum drug concentration.
• Cmax is expressed in mcg/ml.

Time of peak concentration (tmax)
• The time for drug to reach peak concentration in
plasma ( after extravascular administration) is
called the time of peak concentration.
• It is expressed in hours.
• Onset time and onset of action is dependent
upon tmax.
• The parameter is of particular importance in
assessing the efficacy of drugs used to treat
acute conditions like pain and insomnia.

Area under the curve (AUC)
• It represents the total integrated area under the
plasma level-time profile and expresses the total
amount of drug that comes into the systemic
circulation after its administration.
• AUC is expressed in mcg/ml X HRS.
• It is important for the dugs that are administered
repetitively for the treatment of chronic
conditions like asthma or epilepsy.

 DIFFERENCE FACTOR (f1) & SIMILARITY FACTOR (f2)
 The difference factor (f1) as defined by FDA calculates the %
difference between 2 curves at each time point and is a
measurement of the relative error between 2 curves.
1f = × 100
where, n = number of time points
Rt = % dissolved at time t of reference product (pre change)
Tt = % dissolved at time t of test product (post change)



30
/7



 
  
  
n
R t  T t
 R t
t  1
 t  1 
n

 The similarity factor (f2) as defined by FDA is logarithmic
reciprocal square root transformation of sum of squared error
and is a measurement of the similarity in the percentage (%)
dissolution between the two curves



 




100f2 = 50 × log
1
0.5
1 n
wt(RtTt)
nr1
31
/7

• Limits for similarity and Difference factors
Difference factor Similarity factor inference
0 100 Dissolutions profile
are similar
≤15 ≥50 Similarity or
equivalence of two
profiles

• Data structure and steps to follow:
• This model-independent method is most suitable for the
dissolution profile comparison when three to four or more
dissolution time points are available.
• Determine the dissolution profile of two products (12 units
each) of the test (post-change) and reference (pre-change)
products.

• Using the mean dissolution values from both curves at each
time interval, calculate the difference factor (f1) and similarity
factor (f2) using the above equations.
• For curves to be considered similar, f1 values should be close
to 0, and f2 values should be close to 100. Generally, f1 values
up to 15 (0-15) and f2 values greater than 50 (50-100) ensure
sameness or equivalence of the two curves and, thus, of the
performance of the test (post-change) and reference (pre-
change) products.

• In dissolution profile comparisons, especially to assure
similarity in product performance, the regulatory interest is in
knowing how similar the two curves are, and to have a
measure which is more sensitive to large differences at any
particular time point. For this reason, the f2 comparison has
been the focus in agency guidance and used to make a
decision.

• Some recommendations:
• The dissolution measurements of the test and reference
batches should be made under exactly the same conditions.
• The dissolution time points for both the profiles should be the
same (e.g. 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes).
• The reference batch used should be the most recently
manufactured pre-change product.

• Only one measurement should be considered after 85%
dissolution of both the products (when applicable).
• To allow use of mean data, the percent coefficient of variation
(% CV) at the earlier time points (e.g. 15 minutes) should not
be more than 20%, and at other time points should not be
more than 10%.
• The mean dissolution values for reference can be derived
either from last pre-change batch or the last two or more
consecutively manufactured pre-change batches.

• Applications
• • This method is more appropriate when more than three or
four dissolution time points are available.
• • The f2 may become invariant with respect to the location
change and the consequence of failure to take into account
the shape of the curve and the unequal spacing between
sampling time points lead to errors.
• • Nevertheless, with a slight modification in the statistical
analysis, similarity factor would definitely serves as an
efficient tool for reliable comparison of dissolution profiles.

• • Nevertheless, with a slight modification in the statistical
analysis, similarity factor would definitely serves as an
efficient tool for reliable comparison of dissolution profiles.

• Advantages
• 1. They are easy to compute.
• 2. They provide a single number to describe the comparison of
dissolution profile data.
• Disadvantages
• 1. The values of f1 and f2 are sensitive to the number of
dissolution time points used.
• 2. The basis of the criteria for deciding the difference or
similarity between dissolution profile is unclear.

• The heckel analysis is a most popular method of deforming
reduction under compression pressure .
• Powder packing with increasing compression load is normally
attributed to particles rearrangement , elastic & plastic
deformation & particle fragmentation.

• It is analogous to first order reaction ,where the pores in the
mass are the reactant , that is:
Log 1/E= Ky . P + Kr
• Where….. Ky =material dependent constant inversely
proportional to its yield strength ‘s’
Kr=initial repacking stage hence E0

• The applied compressional force F & the movement of the
punches during compression cycle & applied pressure P ,
porosity E.
• For a cylindrical tablets p=4F/л. D2 Where… D is the tablet
diameter similarly E can be calculated by E=100.(1-4w/ρt
.л.D2.H) Where…w is the weight of the tableting mass , ρt is
its true density , H is the thickness of the tablets.

• Heckel plot is density v/s applied pressure
• Follows first order kinetics
• As porosity increases compression force also increases
• Thus the Heckel’s plot allows for the interpretation of the
mechanism of bonding.
• Materials that are comparatively soft & that readily undergo
plastic deformation retain different degree of porosity ,
depending upon the initial packing in the die.

This in turn is influenced by the size distribution , shape etc of
the original particles.
• Ex: sodium chloride (shown by type a in graph)
Harder material with higher yield pressure values usually
undergo compression by fragmentation first , to provide a
denser packing.
• Ex: Lactose, sucrose ( shown in type b in graph).

Type-a plots exhibits higher slop (Ky) then type-b.
because type-a materials have lower yield stress.
Type-b plots exhibits lower slop because brittle ,
hard materials are more difficult to compress.

• References:
• • Dissolution, bioavaibility and bioequivalence by Hamed
M. Abdou.
• • The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy by
Lachmann Liberman.
• • Biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics by D.M.
Bhramankar and Sunil b. Jaiswal

Study of consolidation parameters

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Study of consolidation parameters (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Study of consolidation parameters